Vladimir Putin Battles Satan Worshipers and New World Order Agents Again

"We are facing an epic struggle between those who espouse sacred values such as justice and decency versus those who wish to destroy all values."

putin2

“If New World Order Agents and Satan worshipers want a challenge, then they can count me in.”

 

 “The continuing attacks on Vladimir Putin and Russia by members of the western political, military and journalistic elite tell us one thing – the Russian President is doing a good job both for the people of his country and in the international arena.”—Neil Clark[1]

 

…by Jonas E. Alexis

 

Last November, journalist Neil Clark of Russia Today put forth a principle that really should be considered as a knocked-down argument against the Zionist establishment. He said:

“It is a rule which invariably holds true – if the Western elites praise the leader of a foreign country it means he is doing something which is good for those elites and bad for his country. If he’s demonized, as Putin is, it’s the other way round.”[2]

As evidence, Clark cited chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin E. Dempsey saying that the international community needs to “deter Russian aggression against our NATO allies.” Russia, said Dempsey, was “pushing on the limits of international order” and had “kind of lit a fire of nationalism. Once you light that fire, it’s not controllable. I am worried about Europe.”[3]

In response, Clark forcefully and persuasively wrote:

“‘Pushing on the limits of international order’? Was it Russia which launched an illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003 – claiming the country possessed WMDs which threatened the world?[4] Was it Russia which led the illegal bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999? The US hasn’t just pushed the ‘limits of international order’ it has been the number one international law breaker over the past twenty years.

“Russian aggression against our NATO allies’? Not one NATO country has been attacked by Russia – or threatened with attack. The aggression has been from the US against Russian allies. Over the last twenty or so years we have seen the US target a series of countries which had friendly links to Russia, including Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya and Syria. It’s the US and its NATO allies who clearly need to be deterred, not Russia.

“Russia has ‘kind of lit a fire of nationalism’? Well, it was the US and their EU allies who did this in Yugoslavia in the 1990s – sponsoring separatists in order to break up the country – and it was the US and its EU allies who have been sponsoring and supporting extreme nationalists (some would say fascists and neo-Nazis) in Ukraine…

“When figures from the Western elite talk of ‘Russian aggression’ what they really mean is that Russia is checking Western aggression. When Putin is compared to Hitler – it is because he is standing in the way of the real heirs of Adolf Hitler, the war lobby in the West, who like the mustachioed one, have an insatiable appetite for attacking and threatening to attack independent sovereign states.

“By any objective assessment, it’s the Western elites – and in particular the neocon faction within that elite – who are the biggest dangers to world peace, not Putin. Look at the havoc their policy of endless war, whether waged directly or through terrorist proxies, has caused in Iraq, Libya and Syria.”[5]

We completely agree with Clark here. In fact, we have argued earlier that Putin really cut the Zionist establishment to pieces by saying that they always end up worshiping Satan when they pervert or invert or subvert the moral and political order.

As you can recall, Putin said that those who pervert the moral order are already on “a path to degradation.” As an alternative, Putin elsewhere appealed to the Orthodox Church, which he said “cemented the moral foundation of our society and national statehood.” Putin stunned the West by adding that

“At the basis of all Russia’s victories and achievements [are]: patriotism, faith, and a strong spirit. These inherent characteristics of the Russian people helped us to get through the Times of Troubles in 1612, with the Great Patriotic War in 1812…”

Putin moved on to implicitly attack Stalin and Lenin by saying that “other events” in Russia’s history, “including learning the lessons of the turbulent events of the beginning of the twentieth century,” completely undermined Russia’s “spiritual and national values” and ended up persecuting “the Russian Orthodox Church and other traditional religions in Russia.”[6] Once that was done, Russia “started to lose” its unity “and slipped into revolutions, fratricidal bloodshed, conflicts and war.”[7]

So, the establishment can now stop summoning the silly argument that Putin aspires to revive the Bolshevik ideology or even the KGB in Russia. The establishment certainly cannot deny that they indeed promote political disorder and moral chaos, so they had to find a way to attack Putin. In 2013, Shmuley Boteach, “the most famous Rabbi in America,” wrote in the Jerusalem Post:

“Vladimir Putin has established his credentials over the past decade as an international bully, a KGB apparatchik who suppresses political dissent with oppression and murder, a gangster who subjected Pussy Riot’s members, in prison, to ‘endless humiliations,’ including forced gynecological examinations almost every day for three weeks. A man who would treat women this way just because they oppose him politically deserves the condemnation of the world as a violent brute.”[8]

Jewish Neocon Richard Perle, commonly known as “The Prince of Darkness” and one of the most dishonest men in American history,[9] summoned a number of lies last year to slander Putin. He said that Putin was trying to resurrect the Soviet Union. He said: “He’s been trying to put Humpty Dumpty back together again and re-create something that looks like the old Soviet empire.”[10]

Virtually no serious person bought Perle’s colossal lie. But the regime has recently invented a new strategy: Russia probably hacked their unclassified network.

“Russian hackers,” the regime has recently announced, “infiltrated an unclassified Pentagon e-mail system used by employees of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the latest in a series of state-sponsored attacks on sensitive U.S. government computer networks.”[11]

Is that really news? Hasn’t the establishment been summoning those lies for decades? The pathetic thing is that the so-called Republican Party has bought those lies and swallowed them with great enthusiasm. Listen to this:

“The Russian cyber-attack on the Pentagon’s Joint Staff unclassified email system may be tied to a top Iranian military official’s visit to Moscow, Sen. Ted Cruz alleged during Thursday’s first Republican presidential debate.

“In the only cyber-security mention of the night, the Texas Republican was asked about recent reports that Russian hackers infiltrated the Pentagon’s Joint Staff unclassified email system around July 25.

“Cruz questioned whether the cyber-attack was timed to coincide with secretive meetings between Qassem Soleimani, a major general in the Iranian army, and Russian leaders in Moscow.

“The meeting comes as Congress is debating whether to accept a deal to limit Iran’s nuclear weapons program in exchange for lifting sanctions on Tehran. ‘The day Soleimani flew back,’ Cruz said, ‘was the day we believe Russia used cyber warfare against the Joint Chiefs.’”[12]

What is the evidence for all this? Nothing. Not an iota of serious information has been provided so far. In fact, it seems that the regime has just made this stuff up in order to create conflict. “This attack was fairly sophisticated and has the indications . . . of having come from a state actor such as Russia,” said one unnamed U.S. official.[13]

The Washington Post itself reported that officials admitted that “it is difficult to pinpoint the origin or perpetrator of such hacks.”[14] It is difficult to pinpoint the origin of such hacks, but we know that Russia was behind it!

Complete nonsense. However, this is not the first time that the regime invents evil things to pursue their essentially Satanic ideology.

Remember how the establishment lied saying that North Korea hacked Sony Pictures? You remember how Neocons such as Jonathan S. Tobin declared that the so-called cyber-attack was an “act of terrorism”?[15] Remember how the same guy went berserk saying that “no American should feel safe” about the “attack”?[16] Remember how silly he looked when all the evidence showed that North Korea had nothing to do with the so-called hack?[17]

Remember how the system was blaming Assad for using chemical weapons on his own people?[18] You remember how U.S. officials got that lie from the Israeli regime?[19] You remember how the same regime said that it had incontrovertible proof that Assad did use chemical weapons but never presented the proof?[20]

You remember how Seymour M. Hersh rightly declared that this was a “deliberate manipulation of intelligence”?[21] You remember how virtually every Neocon (from the Weekly Standard to the American Enterprise Institute) and much of the Republican Party were saying that the U.S. must attack Assad as a result?[22]

You remember how Russian officials defused that nonsense by presenting logical and solid evidence pointing to the fact that Assad had nothing to do with the chemical weapons?[23] Russian officials stunned much of the entire world they stated explicitly then:

“If the establishment of international control over chemical weapons in that country would allow avoiding strikes, we will immediately start working with Damascus. We are calling on the Syrian leadership to not only agree on placing chemical weapons storage sites under international control, but also on its subsequent destruction and fully joining the treaty on prohibition of chemical weapons.”[24]

Rick Ungar of Forbes wrote then: “Nicely played, Mr. Putin. My hat goes off to you.”

War party was over. Putin crashed it. Putin obviously messed the Neocons up. As Neil Clark put it:

“These serial warmongers are particularly angry that Russian foreign policy has thwarted their plans for ‘regime change’ in Syria, a key strategic objective. They’re also angry that Putin clamped down on oligarchs whose role was to help Western plutocrats get control of Russia’s natural resources.”[25]

Neocon Satanists, who always lust after the blood of the Goyim in the Middle East and elsewhere, went mad precisely because Putin did not allow them to drink blood this time. Remember the words of Neocon Satanist Michael Ledeen:

“Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace … We must destroy them to advance our historic mission.”

Neil Clark

Neil Clark

Hence, it is no accident that those Satanists, the usual suspects, are all after Putin in one way or another. As Clark nicely put it last month:

“As events in Syria have proved, Russia is the biggest block on the endless war lobby’s plans for world domination, which is why the removal of Putin and his replacement with a marionette who will do exactly what the neocons want is their overriding objective.

“However, the chances of them achieving their ambitious goal are as slender as was the prospect of Saddam Hussein’s WMDs turning up in Iraq. The new neocon instigated ‘Cold War’ on Russia, which was supposed to weaken the Russian economy and lead to Maidan-style anti-government protests in the country, has actually boosted President Vladimir Putin’s popularity, as new polls show. The approval ratings of the man who Western neocons have demonized for the last twelve years is at record levels – with almost 90 percent of Russians saying they had a positive view of the president.

“Support for President Putin’s foreign policies is also strong – with 70 percent supporting him on Ukraine. As British antiwar politician George Galloway tweeted: ‘Popularity of Putin reaches record highs with almost 90% of the people approving his handling of events. Another NATO success story!’

“It’s not only Putin’s popularity that is the stumbling block to neocon plans for ‘regime change’. The main opposition to Putin and his United Russia party, are not pro-NATO, pro-Israel ‘liberals’, but the Communist Party, which is the second most popular party in the country.

“Communist leader Gennady Zyuganov polled over 17 percent in the last presidential election, while the Communists won 92 seats in the 450 State Duma elections in December 2011.

“The Communists have urged Putin to be even more assertive against those they regard as Russia’s enemies. In May 2013, they called for Russia to convene a meeting of the UN Security Council after Israel had illegally bombed Syria.

“The serial regime changers in the West are faced with a situation that the most credible opposition to the person they want to see toppled would actually follow policies that they would hate even more.

“So what do they do? With breathtaking disdain for the views of the Russian people, they completely ignore the fact that the Communists are the second largest party in Russia – and instead portray so-called ‘liberals’ – who have minimal levels of popular support (currently around 1 percent), as the ‘democratic opposition.’

“The neocon line is: ‘in the name of democracy, the parties whose views are the most unpopular with the electorate, should be running Russia.’ Their interpretation of the word ‘democracy’ is beyond Orwellian.

“Although ‘regime change’ has become a dirty phrase, the best thing that could happen to Russia, its neighbors and the world would be a change from Vladimir Putin’s brand of strongman authoritarianism to some form of democracy,” opined Alexander Motyl in Newsweek in January. The article first appeared on the Atlantic Council’s blog.

“So, in other words, the man with sky-high approval ratings needs to be toppled, so someone much less popular can rule Russia. And all in the name of spreading ‘democracy’!”[26]

Putin, Clark said elsewhere, is quite different from his predecessor, Boris Yeltsin, who was always willing to prostrate before the powers that be:

“Back in 2000, when he was first elected President, Western elites hoped that Putin would continue the path set by his predecessor Boris Yeltsin, a man whose rule was disastrous for ordinary Russians, who saw their living standards plummet and the value of their life savings destroyed, but very good for the Western elites.

“Yeltsin privatized vast swathes of the economy and acquiesced while NATO destroyed Yugoslavia. Yeltsin was bad news for Russia – but he was hailed as a great ‘democrat’ by the West – and eulogized on his death – which tells us everything we need to know about who benefited most from his rule.

“Putin himself had no great desire to fall out with the West when he became President – quite the contrary. He was the first international leader to offer his condolences to President George W. Bush after the 9/11 terrorist attacks on New York. ‘In the name of Russia, I want to say to the American people – we are with you,’ he said…”[27]

Clark said that the “the aggressive neocon faction within the Western elite” sabotaged that fruitful dialogue.[28] Putin stood up against Russian Jewish oligarchs such as Boris Berezovksy and Mikhail Khodorkovsky, and obviously the Neocons never forgave him for this unpardonable sin. “Rebuilding the economy and improving living standards for ordinary Russians inevitably meant action being taken against certain oligarchs who had made vast fortunes in the Yeltsin years.”[29]

It is no accident, then, that the Neocon faction in America is mad, since some of their brethren in Russia were not allowed to suppress and oppress the ordinary man any longer. “Influential neocons in Washington who had links to Russian oligarchs, used the arrest of Khodorkovsky for fraud and tax evasion to push for a hardening of US policy towards Moscow.”[30] Bruce P. Jackson, a useful idiot, declared then:

“The arrest of one man has sent us a signal that our well-intentioned Russian policy has failed. We must now recognize that there has been a massive suppression of human rights and the imposition of a de facto Cold War-type administration in Moscow.”[31]

Putin, of course, seemed to have said enough is enough. In fact, he forthrightly opposed the Iraq invasion in 2003. So, the Neocons obviously vowed to destroy him.

“The neocon propaganda stepped up again with the mysterious death of M16 agent Alexander Litvinenko, in London in late 2006. Inevitably the death was blamed on Moscow – despite the absence of proof…

“The newly-elected US President Barack Obama promised a ‘reset’ of relations with Russia, but with the neocons still in town and peddling their anti-Putin and anti-Russian propaganda there was never any hope of that succeeding.

“The current wave of Russophobia can be linked to events in the Middle East- and Russia’s refusal to back ‘regime change’ in Syria. They desperately wanted Bashar al-Assad removed- so as to break the alliance between Syria, Hezbollah and Iran, but Russia has got in the way.

“Ukraine was where the neocons thought they would get their revenge. The US sponsored regime change in Kiev, an enterprise in which the State Department’s Victoria Nuland the wife of the Project for a New American Century co-founder Robert Kagan played a prominent role, finally enabled the hawks to get what they been dreaming of for over ten years – the sanctioning of Russia.”[32]

Despite his shortcomings, Putin is a man who deserves our respect. His appeal to the moral law and order is a threat to the establishment. This is why they continue to panic and leave in fear. One man is trying to mess them up. Let us hope and pray that he continues to cut agents of the New World Order to pieces. To cite again our friend and ally Kevin Barrett:

“We are facing an epic struggle between those who espouse sacred values such as justice and decency versus those who wish to destroy all values. God bless President Putin, who is putting the fear of God into the New World Order.”


[1] Neil Clark, “Putin demonized for thwarting neocon plan for global domination,” Russia Today, November 8, 2014.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Ibid.

[4] For those who are new to this topic, see for example John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2007); Vincent Bugliosi, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder (New York: Vanguard Books, 2000); Paul R. Pillar, Intelligence and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011); Bob Drogin, Curveball: Spies, Lies, and the Con Man Who Caused a War (New York: Random House, 2007); Michael Isikoff, Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War (New York: Crown Forum, 2008); Bob Woodward, Point of Attack: The Definitive Account of the Decision to Invade Iraq (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004).

[5] Clark, “Putin demonized for thwarting neocon plan for global domination,” Russia Today, November 8, 2014.

[6] For those who would like to pursue this study further, see for example  Edward Roslof, Red Priests: Renovationism, Russian Orthodoxy, and Revolution, 1905-1946 (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 2002); Steven Rosefielde, Red Holocaust (New York: Routledge, 2010); Norman M. Naimark, Stalin’s Genocide (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010); Robert Conquest, The Great Terror: A Reassessment (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008); Stalin: Breaker of Nation (New York: Penguin, 1991); John Shelton Curtis, The Russian Church and the Soviet State (Boston: Little Brown, 1953); Jane Ellis, The Russian Orthodox Church: A Contemporary History (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986); Dimitry V. Pospielovsky, A History of Marxist-Leninist Atheism and Soviet Anti-Religious Policies (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1987); Daniel Peris, Storming the Heavens: The Soviet League of the Militant Godless (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998).

[7] Perhaps E. Michael Jones should send Putin a copy of his magnum opus, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History.

[8] Shmuley Boteach, “No holds barred: Is Putin a friend to the Jews who deserves support?,” Jerusalem Post, March 17, 2013.

[9] See Dana Milbank, “Prince of Darkness Denies Own Existence,” Washington Post, February 20, 2009; Alan Weisman, Prince of Darkness: Richard Perle—The Kingdom, the Power, & the End of the World (New York: Union Square Press, 2007).

[10] “AEI’s Perle: Putin Trying to Put ‘Humpty Dumpty Back Together,’” NewsMax.com, April 23, 2014.

[11] Craig Whitlock and Missy Ryan, “U.S. suspects Russia in hack of Pentagon computer network,” Washington Post, August 6, 2015.

[12] Cory Bennett, “Cruz: Russian Pentagon hack tied to Iranian meetings,” The Hill, August 6, 2015.

[13] Whitlock and Ryan, “U.S. suspects Russia in hack of Pentagon computer network,” Washington Post, August 6, 2015.

[14] Ibid.

[15] Jonathan S. Tobin, “Vandalism or Terror, North Korea is Obama’s Responsibility,” Commentary, December 22, 2014.

[16] Ibid.

[17] See for example Michael Hiltzik, “These experts still don’t buy the FBI claim that North Korea hacked Sony,” LA Times, December 21, 2014; Marc Rogers, “No North Korea Didn’t Hack Sony,” Daily Beast, December 24, 2014; Jeyup S. Kwaak, “North Korea Proposes Joint Probe on Sony Hacking Attack,” Wall Street Journal, December 20, 2014; Bruce Schneier, “Did North Korea Really Attack Sony?,” Atlantic, December 22, 2014; Michael Malice, “The Magical World of North Korea,” New York Observer, December 18, 2014.

[18] For an interesting article on this, see Seymour M. Hersh, “The Red Line and the Rate Line,” London Review of Books, Vol. 36, No. 8, April 17, 2014.

[19] Ariel David, “Israel: Syria’s Assad Used Chemical Weapons,” Huffington Post, April 23, 2013; Stuart Winer, “Assad using chemical weapons again, Israeli official says,” Times of Israel, April 7, 2014.

[20] David E. Sanger and Jodi Rudoren, “Israel Says It Has Proof That Syria Has Used Chemical Weapons,” NY Times, April 23, 2013.

[21] Seymour M. Hersh, “Whose Sarin?,” London Review of Books, Vol. 35, No. 24, December 19, 2013.

[22] Bob Dreyfuss, “Crisis in Syria: Obama vs. the Neocons: Republican war hawks are pressing for military engagement in Syria. Here’s hoping the president ignores them,” The Nation, December 13, 012.

[23] See for example Simon Tisdall and Josie le Blond, “Assad did not order Syria chemical weapons attack, says German press,” Guardian, September 9, 2013; Miriam Elder and Richard Norton-Taylor, “Russia dismisses US claims of Syrian chemical weapons use,” Guardian, June 14, 2013; “Putin On Syria: It Would Be ‘Utter Nonsense’ For Assad To Use Chemical Weapons,” Huffington Post, August 31, 2013.

[24] Rick Ungar, “Putin Offers Surprise Plan For International Control Of Syrian Chemical Weapons-Moves To Steal Obama’s Thunder?,” Forbes, September 9, 2013.

[25] Clark, “Putin demonized for thwarting neocon plan for global domination,” Russia Today, November 8, 2014.

[26] Neil Clark, “Regime change in Russia? Think again, neocons,” Russia Today, July 25, 2015.

[27] Clark, “Putin demonized for thwarting neocon plan for global domination,” Russia Today, November 8, 2014.

[28] Ibid.

[29] Ibid.

[30] Ibid.

[31] Ibid.

[32] Ibid.

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on August 8, 2015, With 13851 Reads Filed under Investigations, Life. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

24 Responses to "Vladimir Putin Battles Satan Worshipers and New World Order Agents Again"

  1. 60sstreetpunk  August 12, 2015 at 10:40 am

    dublinMick- I know where you are getting this stuff about the Jesuits but most of it is nonsense. With all the problems in the world, anti-Catholics have to exaggerate Jesuit power. Jesuit power is nothing but making it appear to be a player makes for selling books. The world’s problems are hardly a Protestant versus Catholic thing. What nonsense in this modern world.

    • pmccabe64  August 12, 2015 at 6:55 pm

      Putin has done some good things, which earned him more actual graces, that he might repent of his sins and heresies, and come to the True Catholic God and The One, True Church He founded upon Saint Peter the first pope. Beware of the false church in Rome, that calls itself catholic. It is the church of satan, with its leaders (antipopes) as freemasons in costumes. JohnTheBaptist.us

    • pmccabe64  August 12, 2015 at 6:56 pm

      “Russia Appropriately Jailed Members of Blasphemous Feminist Punk Rock Band,” “France ‘double standards’: Prison for Mosque offence, fines for Femen church affront,” by RT [Russian] News These are 2 good, recent writings that show what I am saying here.

  2. 60sstreetpunk  August 12, 2015 at 10:34 am

    Dan- I forgot how I got registered as Republican- may have been Reagan days , but I changed to not being of any party. Yes, the Republicans are clearly in the pockets of rich American Jews like Adelson. Fox News is what I watch but it is obvious that Fox will never say anything bad about Israel- it is so blatant yet the masses that love Fox just don’t get it.
    My sisters are devout Catholics but I had to tell them that the family man book writer and “Catholic” Rick Santorum took around $175,000 from one American Zionist some years back, and the convert to Catholicism Newt Gingrich was made financially secure by the millions given to him by Adelson some 6-7 years ago.
    Michael Scheurer , retired CIA, made it so clear in his book years ago that the USA is having all these problems because of our pandering to Israel and Israel’s unrelenting stealing of land from Palestinians and its constant killing and maiming of innocent Palestinians. Scheurer was head of Bin Laden unit for many years. I would think he knows what he is talking about.
    So many problems caused by that tiny country in the Mideast- controls our Congress and Senate- hard to believe, very hard, but true- like a crazy science fiction novel.

  3. 60sstreetpunk  August 12, 2015 at 10:25 am

    Thank you Dan. I always pay good attention to your comments- you are well read and have common sense and practical experience in military and many other things.
    there are many bright minds that comment here- their comments reflect this. I am left handed and often feel that others see things better than I do .

  4. 60sstreetpunk  August 10, 2015 at 3:39 pm

    If foreigners come to America and make this country sane again, then it may be a blessing. I read that some 25% of Black youth are unemployed yet millions are being brought to USA. Should not jobs go to those Americans of any heritage whose ancestors have been here for quite some time.
    I read the death rolls of WW2 and feel that the white of European heritage was purged by war but of course when we wisely and humanely (common sense) integrated our Armed Forces, the man of color could now die just like the rest of us when our country got into another conflict.
    I will be happy to have others read copies of Jonas’ article here.
    Our 4 star Marine said Russia poses the greatest threat to the USA.

  5. 60sstreetpunk  August 10, 2015 at 3:27 pm

    If you don’t watch the Republican debates then you cannot properly comment on them just like people who critique books and haven’t read them. Yes, Cruz and many are in Zionist pockets but the massive votes of support for Israel by Dems and Republicans show that over 95% of all our Congressmen and Senators do not want to curry disfavor with the super rich and powerful Jews in America. Therefore, I postulate that all debates are BS but if we don’t watch them then we won’t know.
    And Dan, Obama and so many have destroyed America. Foreign languages are being spoken all over America. Walk into a military commissary and it often seems that one only hears Spanish. There are Bhutanese and people from everywhere being positioned all over America- Somalis all over- upstate NY, Minnesota, Maine, and so on.
    If it were not for whites of European heritage, Obama would not be watching TV or sitting in an air conditioned house, or using his smart phone, and so on. And, when the power goes out in DC, it is Obama’s ignorant whites of European heritage who go out in the ice storm and climb poles and restore power so that the majority of Americans can watch sports and sitcoms and reality TV shows.
    The majority of drivers are aggressive and tailgate. Watch the dress and behavior- far cry from just 30-40 years ago (and yes, I know about Vietnam-it sucked- but most of us were still united as Americans).
    And the music…

    • Dan  August 11, 2015 at 12:40 pm

      60sstreetpunk, if I’m the Dan you’re referring to, I was a registered Republican for over 40 years and remain a paleoconservative of the Chronicles variety, for what it’s worth. My beef is that the Republican party is a total sellout to the Zionists, whose domestic opposition to Obama’s cultural Marxist and anti-Christian agenda is just so much empty rhetoric.

  6. jones  August 10, 2015 at 11:44 am

    Every mother in the world is in love with Valdimir Putin!

  7. Harold Saive  August 10, 2015 at 8:02 am

    Putin is part of the NWO dance. He is simply upping the ante to gain more financial inclusion in the “final solution”. Russian Oligarchs want a bigger piece of the action and Putin is in place to provide it. He is waiting for China to be convinced of the inevitability of Rothschild dominance as the end-game. This is why he has been dragging his feet on push-back to NATO.

    Why would Russian Oligarchs claim more altruism than any other oligarch?

    Putin knows that the perceived center of evil lies inside tiny Israel. Despite this easy physical target erased from the planet with only one nuke, Putin pretends not to be interested in applying physical pressure on the Netenyahu terrorists as they blatantly support the phony, stateless, ISIS beheaders because he knows the decisions for the future of Russian oligarchs are made by the same people he claims are attempting to lure him into WWIII.

    Don’t be fooed. They are all in it together save a squabble here and there. Why would the NOT be when benefits to the global elite are so lucrative.

    • Jonas E. Alexis  August 10, 2015 at 5:50 pm

      Harold Saive,

      I honestly understand your points and concerns. But understand that the Roman Empire was not built in one day. Yes, Putin has his shortcomings. But it would not be wise for him to take a completely radical change on just about everything. This is certainly not idealistic. Progress or patience is a key here. The fact that he attacks NWO agents on a moral term is a good step forward.

      Another point to consider is this: If “Putin is part of the NWO dance,” why would Victoria Nuland and other NWO kooks spend billions of dollars destabilizing the situation in the Ukraine? I have a good Russian friend of mine here in Korea and we happened to discuss some of these issues. He agrees with the assessment that Yeltsin was largely an NWO agent and that Putin is quite different. The central key here is that the Zionist kingdom and Neocon talking heads do not like Putin—and that’s an infallible sign that Putin is bringing something to the table.

  8. Danshee  August 9, 2015 at 9:31 pm

    Putin is doing good so far. However, it is imperative that the Russian Federation and her friends China develop a more aggressive defensive strategy to lure the beast into it’s destruction in the center of the Eurasian continent. They shouldn’t believe for a second that somehow the beast will let go just like that over time, NO NEVER ! They cannot ! In knowing this fact one has to create a gigantic trap for them. One weakness the empire of doom and destruction has, is it can easily be manipulated by emotions, in fact it has absolutely no defense against it !!! This together with some other machinations (deceptions) can create a trap in which the beast cannot withstand to trample into. I hope they soon develop that capacity.

  9. Amarka  August 9, 2015 at 2:55 pm

    “When Putin is compared to Hitler – it is because he is standing in the way of the real heirs of Adolf Hitler, the war lobby in the West, who like the mustachioed one, have an insatiable appetite for attacking and threatening to attack independent sovereign states.”

    I have a real problem with that statement. As I see it Hitler did not invade the USSR to conquer it, but to rid it of the Jewish Bolshevik experiment for world domination. Neil Clarke is a victim himself of Jewish propaganda.

    • Dublinmick  August 10, 2015 at 8:17 pm

      Amarka
      Hitler was a Rothschild, he received bushels of vatican gold to build the SS which was trained by the jesuits who are to the core jewish. Stalin was a jesuit priest and both he and Hitler were trained at the Tavistock Institute in London.

      The goal then as is now was to garner the immense resources in Russia and destroy orthodox christianity there for the glory of Rome. They almost did.

      Hitler did not die in the bunker either and even now FBI documents finally reveal this. Hitler’s relatives test positive for the Y-DNA haplong group E1B1B, which is khazar and the way they identify each other. That holds true in Japan also where the Shinto religion which is some 40 percent of the population is jewish. They have an ark of the covenent, temple of solomon, sacrifice pole and the works. The Japanese royal family is Shinto and has the six pointed star on the gate and various monuments. That is why Japan was allied with the third reich.

      You might want to google Hitler was a Rothschild.

    • Poppadop  August 11, 2015 at 5:49 am

      If Hitler were a Rothschild, why did Germany do the exact opposite of what bankster puppets do? Why weren’t the Nazis kept around like the Communists?

      “When the Weimar Republic collapsed economically, it opened the door for the National Socialists to take power. Their first financial move was to issue their own state currency which was not borrowed from private central bankers. Freed from having to pay interest on the money in circulation, Germany blossomed and quickly began to rebuild its industry. The media called it ‘The German Miracle’. TIME magazine lionized Hitler for the amazing improvement in life for the German people and the explosion of German industry, and even named him TIME Magazine’s Man Of The Year in 1938.”
      ~ “All Wars Are Bankers’ Wars,” Michael Rivero

  10. Aziz Khalfan  August 9, 2015 at 12:46 pm

    It is very rare for a modern and a powerful leader to exhibit a disciplined effort to appear meek, humble, intelligent and trustworthy to ordinary people as Putin does. Unlike the seemingly demon-possesed modern carreer politicians strutting the world stage and responsible for the messy state of affairs in every aspect everywhere.

    Being a man of few words he is easy to understand and agree with.

    “Despite his shortcomings, Putin is a man who deserves our respect. His appeal to the moral law and order is a threat to the establishment.”

  11. Dan  August 9, 2015 at 6:10 am

    Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law.

    That the “our” in Ledeen’s quote refers ultimately to Zionism and International Jewry can easily be demonstrated, not least by the “neocon” rage over Putin’s slap down of a few Jewish arch-criminals sucking the economic lifeblood out of Russia, and it succinctly affirms that cultural genocide is being waged against this country and Western Europe as well. But we already know this. What’s troubling is the Dempsey quote that nationalism, wherever it’s found, is a fire that the US military will extinguish, and should be a red flag that America, as opposed to its Zio occupation gov, is slated for extinction as well.

    Ledeen’s throwing in architecture is instructive considering the profound influence the built environment has on our lives. Gushing “neocon” reviews of post-modernist architectural monstrosities routinely use Marxist terminology such as “transgress,” “defile,” “tear down,” etc, which is precisely what (largely) Jewish architecture these days is intended to do, and it’s accurate to say they’re already bombing our cities, but in ways not easy to detect, creating a psychological, if not physical, Dresden or Gaza here as well.

  12. captain obvious  August 9, 2015 at 2:29 am

    slightly different direction but lets compare Putin and Assad’s approval ratings by the people in those countries to the more often BARELY double digit approval rating of “Congress”..
    who are constantly “re-elected” exactly how? excuse me(?) for asking which might be in more desperate need of what they like to call “regime change”? I dont care how much lipstick or how many pairs of wings they try to tape on for appearances.. they’re still pigs! (thats really an insult to pigs, even the wild ones are much more civilized)

  13. pmccabe64  August 8, 2015 at 7:58 pm

    Putin has done some good things, which earned him more actual graces, that he might repent of his sins and heresies, and come to the True Catholic God and The One, True Church He founded upon Saint Peter the first pope. Beware of the false church in Rome, that calls itself catholic. It is the church of satan, with its leaders (antipopes) as freemasons in costumes. JohnTheBaptist.us

    • pmccabe64  August 8, 2015 at 8:00 pm

      “Russia Appropriately Jailed Members of Blasphemous Feminist Punk Rock Band,” “France ‘double standards’: Prison for Mosque offence, fines for Femen church affront,” by RT [Russian] News These are 2 good, recent writings that show what I am saying here.

  14. Bill  August 8, 2015 at 7:05 pm

    BTW apology in order. Didn’t even watch the Repub. debate ( why waste the time? ) but voted Trump in survey. He’s the guy who thinks the nuclear ( peace ) treaty with Iran sells Talmudia down the river. He’s also the guy who’s been tasked with the thankless job of bolting to a 3rd party and putting Jeb or Hillary
    ( equally evil ) in the WH.

    • Dan  August 9, 2015 at 6:56 am

      Right. Why waste 2 precious hours watching cuckservative excuses for manhood recite AIPAC scripted talking points? Somebody needs to inform the GOP their candidates need to slip the potato down front next time around.

      Trump? He’s a ringer being used as an attention getter, or there wouldn’t be a chance in hell he’d get airtime. Chances are it’s also the Zios’ grinning mockery and revelation of the method, telling those with eyes to see that our elections are no more real than one of Trump’s phony reality shows.

  15. Bill  August 8, 2015 at 6:58 pm

    I like Putin but I think his “strategy” of waiting for the misruled West to punch itself to exhaustion ( while building enmity and the contempt of all other nations-except Talmudia ) is less than inspiring. A bold move this year or next is needed. Take out the junta in Kiev. A decisive air attack against ISIS and the other, “more moderate” rebel elements would also be very good. And much needed.

  16. Moti Nissani  August 8, 2015 at 6:18 pm

    Excellent article! Thanks.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network