…by Jonas E. Alexis
Benjamin Netanyahu just unintentionally messed the Zionist project up by saying that Hitler had no intention of exterminating the Jews in Germany. Netanyahu said:
“Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jew. And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said, ‘If you expel them, they’ll all come here (to Palestine).’ According to Netanyahu, Hitler then asked: ‘What should I do with them?’ and the mufti replied, ‘Burn them.’
There is enough poison in the statement here. But if we search for a glimpse of truth even here, we can see that Netanyahu actually dropped a political explosive which indirectly weakened his Zionist project and which ended up supporting Holocaust revisionism. In other words, thanks to Netanyahu, the Holocaust narrative is basically over and Holocaust revisionism is back on the menu.
But people are beginning to see that Netanyahu wants to have it both ways. They are beginning to realize that there is more to Netanyahu than meets the eye. Haaretz declares that he is “living in la-la land.” We are also told by the same newspaper that “There’s a Method to Netanyahu’s Hitler-Mufti Madness.”
Now, let us turn the political equation around. Let us suppose that a serious politician in the Western world happens to utter what Netanyahu had said. What would happen to that person? Again, you remember what happened to our courageous friend Fredrick Toben?
You remember what happened to our friend and noted scientist Professor Denis Rancourt when he stood up against the Zionist mafia at the University of Ottawa? Rancourt is serious scientist and plays by the rules. In fact, he has cut other scientists to pieces when they try to fudge the data with respect to climate change:
But Rancourt’s career was officially over when he challenged the powers that be. After teaching for more than twenty-five years at the University of Ottawa, Rancourt was fired from his position.
So, the big question here is simply this: why is Netanyahu not going to jail? Why is he not charged or fined for his thought crime? Where is Deborah Lipstadt when you need her?
Furthermore, why is Angela Merkel quickly defending the Holocaust narrative by saying that “All Germans know the history of the murderous race mania of the Nazis that led to the break with civilization that was the Holocaust”? Merkel, as usual, has prostrated before the Dreadful Few when she said,
“This is taught in German schools for good reason, it must never be forgotten. And I see no reason to change our view of history in any way. We know that responsibility for this crime against humanity is German and very much our own.”
If Netanyahu can get away with saying things like Hitler did not want to exterminate the Jews of Europe, then it is high time for Germany to stop prosecuting Holocaust revisionists.
 “Netanyahu: Hitler Didn’t Want to Exterminate the Jews,” Haaretz, October 21, 2015.
 “Netanyahu Is Living in La-la Land,” Haaretz, October 12, 2015.
 Chemi Shalev, “There’s a Method to Netanyahu’s Hitler-Mufti Madness,” Haaretz, October 23, 2015.
 For a good article on her, see E. Michael Jones, “Holocaust Denial and Thought Control: Deborah Lipstadt at Notre Dame University,” Culture Wars, May 2009.
Posted by Jonas E. Alexis on October 23, 2015, With 2546 Reads Filed under History, Investigations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.