…by Jonas E. Alexis
Gordon Duff’s theory with respect to the so-called Syrian refugees continues to make sense as current events unfold. Duff basically argued last November that countries in Europe are playing double standards. How?
Well, the vast majority said virtually nothing when their own government officials heralded perpetual wars in the Middle East. In fact, most of those people were willing to believe whatever those government officials told them. They were willing to accept categorical lies and fabrications as gospel truth.
Now, it seems that the chicken had come home to roost. Duff said then:
“Europe loved colonialism, loved fighting wars around the world until the chickens came home to roost. Problem is, those doing the suffering in Europe are not those who profited from colonialism and war.
“Conversely, there would be none of the flood we are seeing if it weren’t for European arrogance, drawing maps around the world knowing instability and eternal war and the profits expected from same were to be a part of it.”
Absolutely true. America and much of Europe have bought the Neoconservative ideology arguably right after World War II, and America has invaded at least 67 countries ever since. But people are now beginning to realize that the Neoconservative (or shall we say Neo-Bolshevik) price was too high. People are no paying exorbitant interest rate, which in this case is sexual violence in Europe.
Sexual violence, reports tell us, is in the streets of Europe, and people are now angry. We are told that
“A string of sex assaults and robberies during New Year’s celebrations in Germany has fuelled debate about the country’s ability to integrate large numbers of migrants…”
We are going to assume that those reports are true. Some could be fabrications, and I have contacted my good Australian friend, Dr. Fredrick Toben, to get his take on this. Here is what he told me:
“2015-16 New Year Problems in German cities. We want to see the physical evidence of these events. Where is the security video evidence for these disturbances in these cities? Surely someone observed the chaos that is reported to have happened?
“Fredrick Töben advises that in Australia most public video recordings are controlled by the police. Is there a similar law in Germany that gives police control of all public video recordings? If this is the case, then this would partially explain why there are no recordings of the alleged New Year disturbances.
“On the other hand, where are the thousands of recordings made by passers-by and by participants?. Think of the IS, ISIS, Daesh activities that are propagated via the Internet. No evidence of German New Year riots – only reports after the event?
“I worry that this could be a beat-up so as to entice the ‘right-wing’ to advocate vigilante action etc., which would then further tighten the noose around the Germans who reject their coutnry’s disintegration.”
But for the sake of argument, we will grant the Zionist media the premise that all those reports are accurate.
Frauke Petry, a German chemist and leader of the nationalist party Alternative for Germany, declared:
“Is this the ‘cosmopolitan and colorful’ Germany that Merkel wished for?”
Petry obviously fails to get into the fundamental issues here. As we shall demonstrate later, Merkel is just a pawn in this ideological process.
Furthermore, where was Petry when leaders of Europe were planting seeds of sexual violence virtually all over the Middle East? Does she not have the sophistication to realize that perpetual wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and now in Syria are also part of the problem? Why can’t she read Frankenstein properly?
Petry again said:
“It’s unacceptable that women are sexually molested and robbed by young migrants on the streets and public squares of German cities at night.”
Sorry to beat a dead horse here, but what about Abu Ghraib? Where was Petry then? Why didn’t she come out of the closet and make a strong case against such ruthless violence?
If sexual violence promotes a “whole new dimension of crime,” as the local police force declares in Cologne, what about the “whole new dimension of crime” that has been going on for more than a decade in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria? Do people in those countries matter at all? Just in case your memory is fading, let us do a little history here.
Torture was routine at Abu Ghraib, and forcing prisoners to have sex with one another and sodomizing teenagers was fair game. One prisoner testified that he saw one officer
“fucking a kid, his age would be about 15-18 years. The kid was hurting very bad and they covered all the doors with sheets.
“Then when I heard the screaming I climbed the door because on top it wasn’t covered and I saw [name blacked out], who was wearing the military uniform putting his dick in the little kid’s ass. I couldn’t see the face of the kid because his face wasn’t in front of the door. And the female soldier was taking pictures.”
How did Neocon Dinesh D’Souza defend that practice? Listen to him: “[Jewish] historian Bernard Lewis has pointed out that compared to prisons throughout the Arab world, Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib are like Disneyland.” Both D’Souza and Lewis are obviously psychotic here. But D’Souza’s psychotic mind does not stop here. He moves on to say:
“Abu Ghraib did not reflect the shared values of America, it reflected the sexual immodesty of liberal America.”
D’souza just got out of jail. Perhaps should have spent more time there to clear his head.
Torture was also routine in Afghanistan, where adolescents were beaten with hoses “and pipes and threats of sodomy.” These acts were not done in the dark. Cambridge University published similar reports in a book that is more than 1200 pages long.
It gets worse. Consider this: the estimate of lives lost in the war in Iraq alone is between 100,000 to 600,000, including thousands of civilians. In 2003, at least 12,000 civilians lost their lives. The first three years of the war produced between 104,000 and 223,000 civilian deaths.
When it was over, 2.3 million Iraqis had been forced to flee their homes and towns; by 2008, another 2.7 million Iraqis were displaced, and nearly half a million civilians ended up losing their lives. Thousands upon thousands of other people went missing by 2008. This is out of a total Iraqi population of about 30 million people.
When the war was over, sectarian violence and car bombings were rampant—almost every day. When Mark Kukis went to Iraq to report on what happened, he said he heard two to five car bombs every day. The Iraq war, says Kukis, shook the entire nation and created havoc even by 2006.
Factions of society that once coexisted were dismantled. In a nutshell, Iraq was in decay. Buildings and farmlands were destroyed. And the fringe benefits of the war? Between 300,000 and 360,000 veterans returned home with brain injuries, some of which went untreated.
By 2005, more than 6,000 soldiers serving in Iraq committed suicide. In 2012, more soldiers committed suicide than died in combat, making it the year with the highest suicide rate since 2001. In addition, the war has sent the American taxpayers a bill of $6 trillion, combined with the fact that a debt ceiling keeps rising every six months or so.
And if you are a student trying to get an education to get out of this economic sinkhole, the government is going to profit from your student loan. It was reported that the government made a profit of $51 billion in 2013 off student loans.
Since apparently we need to police just about every country in the Middle East, we need to assign billions of dollars for defense. Therefore, by the end of 2012, Obama signed a defense spending bill for 2013 that will cost $633 billion.
Homelessness among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans has more than doubled over the past two years, and by the fall of 2012, it was reported that at least “26,531 were living on the streets, at risk of losing their homes, staying in temporary housing or receiving federal vouchers to pay rent.” In addition, about 307,000 soldiers want to leave the military. About 360,000 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans are also dealing with injuries, many of them severe.
You see, there is an implicit contradiction among decent people in Germany and elsewhere, who are now facing the consequences of perpetual wars. They seem to have enough voice now to resist the immorality of perpetual wars. Will they speak up in unison?
At this present moment, they are looking at the symptom. We want them to look at the real cancer, which is devouring the entire body at an astronomical rate. If they cannot look at the emperor right in the eye and tell him that he really has no clothes, then we will never take them seriously.
Furthermore, if people like Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson cannot empower their viewers and call out the people who are spreading this deadly cancer in Europe, if they are still looking at the problem from a Neoconservative perspective, then you can be sure that Jones, Watson, and other puppets are doing exactly what their oppressors want them to do. In fact, their oppressors and other puppets like them continue to propound the same message over and over again.
Jewish Neocon Daniel Greenfield has recently written that
“The only way for European women to have a future is to fight Muslim migration.”
We accept Greenfield’s challenge, but we will add some nuances to his essentially Talmudic ideology here: the only way for European women to have a future is to fight Jewish Neocons like Daniel Pipes, people who perpetuated wars and conflicts in places like Syria in the first place. Let us keep in mind that it was Pipes who diabolically declared that
“The West should prevent either side [Assad’s and the rebels/terrorists’] in the civil war from emerging victorious by helping whichever side is losing, so as to prolong their conflict.’”
“This policy recommendation of ‘helping whichever side is losing’ sounds odd, I admit, but it is strategic.”
Think God that Ken O’Keefe has morally and intellectually castrated Neocon mush-heads and “incessant bogeymen” like Pipes in broad daylight. But instead of making people like Pipes responsible for the protracted conflict in Syria, which got morphed into the crisis in Germany, Greenfield declared: “Merkel made this mess.”
Do you see what Greenfield is doing here?
Pipes basically put a Neoconservative gun in the mouths of Western leaders and threatened them to jump. They responded almost in unison, “How high”? When they eventually followed ordered but then landed in Syria with the purpose of liquidating the Assad government, they had to make a diabolical deal with the so-called Syrian rebels and indeed al-Qaeda and ISIS. In the process, a flood of people began to leave Syria.
Those “refugees” had no choice but to move, since they were being slaughtered by ISIS and other terrorist groups. Now they are landing in Germany and other European countries.
So, how does Greenfield respond? Well, Pipes obviously has nothing to do with it; Western leaders—and in this instance Merkel—“made this mess.” Greenfield once again is an infallible indication that Gordon Duff was right when he said that the refugee crisis is staged:
“Today’s refugee crisis is staged, intended to destroy Europe. The question as always: ‘Who benefits?’”
Good question, but we already know the answer by now.
But the sad part of the story is that major so-called alternative media like Infowars do not want to address this issue contextually and logically at all. If Jones and others deliberately continue to tell their listeners lies and deceptions and half-truths, if they continue to ignore the central issues that are at stake, then we are going to hold them partly responsible for the mess in America.
Jones has a huge following. As a grown man with a bombastic voice, he should know better by now. He should start learning how to tell his listeners the whole truth in love. He needs to start laying out the facts by telling his viewers that like Israel wanted the war in Syria from the beginning. Listen very carefully to Michael Oren, Israel’s outgoing ambassador to the U.S.:
“The initial message about the Syrian issue was that we always wanted Bashar Assad to go, we always preferred the bad guys who weren’t backed by Iran to the bad guys who were backed by Iran.”
Did you catch that? Now, here is the million-dollar question: who are “the bad guys who weren’t backed by Iran”? The so-called Syrian rebels, ISIS, and al-Qaeda.
Guess what? Those bad guys are all fighting Assad. Guess what? They’ve got caught having an incestuous relationship with Israel. “We understand that they are pretty bad guys,” Oren added,
“Still, the greatest danger to Israel is by the strategic arc that extends from Tehran, to Damascus to Beirut. And we saw the Assad regime as the keystone in that arc. That is a position we had well before the outbreak of hostilities in Syria. With the outbreak of hostilities we continued to want Assad to go.”
How can people listen to Jones and never ask him about those vital issues?
 “Locals voice fears, minister vows punishment after ‘Arab’ crowd blamed for sex assaults in Cologne,” Russia Today, January 5, 2016.
 “Germany now has North Africa’s sex crime troubles,” Chicago Tribune, January 6, 2016.
 Mark Danner, Torture and Truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror (New York: New York Review of Books, 2004), 243.
 Dines D’Souza, The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11 (New York: Broadway Books, 2007), 84.
 Ibid., 151.
 Alissa J. Rubin, “Anti-Torture Efforts in Afghanistan Failed, UN Says,” NY Times, Jan. 20, 2013.
 See Karen J. Geenberg and Joshua L. Dratel, eds., The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
 Lila Rajiva, The Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2005), 167.
 “Defense Contractor Paid $5M to Iraqis Over Abu Ghraib,” USA Today, Jan. 8, 2013; “Ex-Abu Ghraib Inmates Gets $5M Settlement from US Firm,” BBC, Jan. 9, 2013.
 Wikipedia, “Casualties of the Iraq War”; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War.
 Mark Kukis, Voices from Iraq: A People’s History, 2003-2009 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011), xvii.
 Ibid., xiii.
 Ibid., xiv.
 Gregg Zoroya, “360,000 Veterans May Have Brain Injuries,” USA Today, March 5, 3009; Denise Grady, “Brain Injuries Are
Seen in New Scans of Veterans,” NY Times, Jun. 1, 2011; “Mental Health Injuries Scar 300,000 US Troops,” MSNBC, April 17, 2008.
 Lizette Alvarez, “War Veterans’ Concussions are Often Overlooked,” NY Times, Aug. 25, 2008.
 Armen Keteyian, “VA Hid Suicide Risk, Internal Emails Show,” CBC News, Jul. 30, 2010.
 Allison Churchill, “Military Losing More Troops to Suicide than Combat,” Business Insider, Oct. 25, 2012; Helen Pow, “More US Troops Committing Suicide Than Being Killed Fighting in Afghanistan,” Daily Mail, Oct. 24, 2012.
 Kelley Vlahos, “Surviving War, Falling to Suicide,” American Conservative, Jan. 1, 2012; James Dao and Andrew W. Lehren, “Baffling
Rise in Suicides Plagues US Military,” NY Times, May 15, 2013.
 Bob Dreyfuss, “The $6 Trillion Wars,” The Nation, March 29, 2013; Daniel Trotta, “Iraq War Cost US More Than $2 Trillion, Could
Grow to $6 Trillion, Says Watson Institute Study,” Huffington Post, March 14, 2013.
 “A Threat to Cost Taxpayers Money,” Economist, Apr. 12, 20111; Kathleen Hennessey, “Obama Tries to Shoot Down GOP Talk of Debt-Limit Threat,” LA Times, December 5, 2012; Mary Williams Walsh, “Debt Ceiling Rises Again as Threat for the US,” NY Times, December 21, 2012; Moran Zhang, “US Economy 2013: If ‘Fiscal Cliff ’ is Avoided, What About the Debt Ceiling?,” International Business Times, December 21, 2012.
 Simon Rogers, “US Debt: How Big is It and Who Owns It?,” Guardian, October 2, 2012.
 Deborah Kotz, “Suicides Surge During Tough Economic Times,” Boston Globe, April 14, 2011.
 “Obama Student Loan Policy Reaping $51 Billion Profit,” Huffington Post, May 14, 2013.
 David Alexander, “House Approves Bill Authorizing $633 Billion in Defense Spending,” Chicago Tribune, Dec. 20, 2012; Dave Boyer, “Obama Signs Defense Measure he Once Vowed to Veto,” Washington Time, Jan. 3, 2013.
 Gregg Zoroya, “Homeless, At-Risk Veterans Double,” USA Today, December 27, 2012.
 Vlahos, “Surviving War, Falling to Suicide,” American Conservative, Jan. 1, 2013
 See for example Noah Rothman, “The End of Europe,” Commentary, January 7, 2016; G. Murphy Donavan, “A Strategy to Defeat Islamic Theo-fascism,” American Thinker, January 7, 2016.
 Daniel Greenfield, “The Muslim War on Women Comes to Germany,” FrontPage Magazine, January 7, 2016.
 Daniel Pipes, “Support the Syrian Rebels?,” National Review, May 12, 2013.
 Greenfield, “The Muslim War on Women Comes to Germany,” FrontPage Magazine, January 7,2016.
 Herb Keinon, “’Israel wanted Assad gone since start of Syria civil war,’” Jerusalem Post, September 17, 2013.
 “Saving their sworn enemy: Heart-stopping footage shows Israeli commandos rescuing wounded men from Syrian warzone – but WHY are they risking their lives for Islamic militants?,” Daily Mail, December 8, 2015; Johnlee Varghese, “UN Report: Israel in Regular Contact with Syrian Rebels including ISIS,” International Business Times, December 7, 2014.
 Keinon, “’Israel wanted Assad gone since start of Syria civil war,’” Jerusalem Post, September 17, 2013.
Posted by Jonas E. Alexis on January 8, 2016, With 6574 Reads Filed under Government & Politics, Investigations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.