Jonas E. Alexis graduated from Avon Park High School, studied mathematics and philosophy as an undergraduate at Palm Beach Atlantic University, and has a master's degree in education from Grand Canyon University.

Some of his main interests include the history of Christianity, U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book ,Christianity & Rabbinic Judaism: A History of Conflict Between Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism from the first Century to the Twenty-first Century.

He is currently teaching mathematics in South Korea. He plays soccer and basketball in his spare time. He is also a cyclist. He is currently writing a book tentatively titled Zionism and the West.

Alexis welcomes comments, letters, and queries in order to advance, explain, and expound rational and logical discussion on issues such as the Israel/Palestine conflict, the history of Christianity, and the history of ideas.

In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, Alexis asks that all queries be appropriately respectful and maintain a level of civility. As the saying goes, “iron sharpens iron,” and the best way to sharpen one’s mind is through constructive criticism, good and bad.

However, Alexis has no patience with name-calling and ad hominem attack. He has deliberately ignored many queries and irrational individuals in the past for this specific reason—and he will continue to abide by this policy.


View Latest Posts >>>

Fight Club: Vladimir Putin Continues to Slay the New World Order Intellectually

Vladimir Putin must have been very proud of himself by now because New World Order agents have already published countless anti-Putin books over the past three years or so.

"I couldn't hear you because the argument was incoherent. If you mean to say that I am still an aggressor while "97% of voters" in Crimea backed me up, I think you are a moron. Sorry to be quite blunt."

“I couldn’t hear you because the argument was and still is patently incoherent. If you mean to say that I am still an aggressor while “97% of voters” in Crimea backed me up, then I think you are a moron. Sorry to be quite blunt, but you can quote me on that.”

…by Jonas E. Alexis

 

Putin must have been very proud of himself by now because New World Order agents have already published countless anti-Putin books over the past three years or so. There seems to be an anti-Putin industry where NWO gangsters can publish basically telepathic things about Putin.

NWO agents simply cannot understand how this man continues to rise above the ashes when they have done everything in their power to slander him and subvert or invert or pervert what he has said.

Listen to some of those book titles: Putinism: Russia and Its Future with the West, by Walter Laqueur (2015); Putinism: The Ideology (2013), by Anne Applebaum; Putinism: The Slow Rise of a Radical Right Regime in Russia (2013), by Marcel H. Van Herpen; The New Tsar: The Rise and Reign of Vladimir Putin (2015), by Steven Lee Myers; Winter Is Coming: Why Vladimir Putin and the Enemies of the Free World Must Be Stopped (2015), by Garry Kasparov; The Man Without a Face: The Unlikely Rise of Vladimir Putin (2013), by Masha Gessen; Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia? (2015), Karen Dawisha; Putin’s Wars: The Rise of Russia’s New Imperialism (2014), Marcel H. Van Herpen; The New Cold War: Putin’s Russia and the Threat to the West (2014), Edward Lucas; The Russia-China Axis: The New Cold War and America’s Crisis of Leadership (2014), Douglas E. Schoen and Melik Kaylan; The Evolution Of Putinism: Russia in Transition 1985-2015 (2015), by Glenn-Iain Steinback; Putin and Putinism (2015), edited by Ronald J. Hill and Ottorino Cappelli; Putin’s Propaganda Machine: Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy, by Marcel H. Van Herpen. The list is almost endless.

We have certainly lost something in the intellectual culture. It used to be that whenever a person purports to write a scholarly or rigorous work, he has to present serious evidence. If he is writing a philosophical treatise, he has no choice but to pledge allegiance to deductive arguments and practical reason.

You simply cannot read Plato’s Republic or Aristotle’s Metaphysics without realizing that those men are dealing with heavy stuff. Those works are so heavy that they have stood the test of time. (For example, Aristotle posited the claim that money is sterile intercourse. The New World Order ignored that warning and we ended up with a crash market in 2008.)

You cannot read R. M. Douglas’s Orderly and Humane: The Expulsion of the Germans after the Second World War or Giles MacDonogh’s After the Reich: The Brutal History of the Allied Occupation or Alfred-Maurice de Zayas’ A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans without coming to terms with the fact that those people went to the archives and searched for primary sources to back up their claims.

You cannot read David Irving’s Hitler’s War or Churchill’s War without giving the man credit for digging into forbidden territories, namely, archival documents. You may disagree with some of his conclusions, but a serious person should appreciate the work of people who are challenging what Irving calls “the traditional enemy of the truth.” “The conformist historian,” says Irving, “don’t like me because they just rely on second-hand sources or third hand sources, which you can get away with…It has an incestuous quality.”

For example, when asked the question, “What did Adolf Hitler know about the Holocaust?,” conformist historians, says Irving, have never been able to produce serious evidence. “They have been quoting each other like dogs running around in a circle,” declares Irving, but no one has ever been able to come up with reliable evidence for the so-called Holocaust. These people, Irving concludes, “are not going back to primary sources.”

Contrast that to what is happening to our culture. Now just about any mush-head can write a silly book, get published, and become a New York Times bestseller. It doesn’t matter whether the book will look ridiculous within five or ten years. Truth is not the intended goal. Money and popularity are the criteria for many.[1]

Remember Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code? Remember how he literally forged his theories?[2] Remember how he began his book by saying that “All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate”?

Well, Dan Brown goofed. And this time goofing means screwing people who really thought that “All descriptions and documents” were accurate. People plunked down the money to buy The Da Vinci Code but later realized that Brown tricked them in order to make millions of dollars.[3] It is estimated that Brown made $250 million from The Da Vinci Code alone.

"Putin is dangerous, more dangerous than the six-trillion dollar war that my brethren has given America."

“Putin is dangerous, more dangerous than the six-trillion dollar war that my brethren have given America.”

Over the years, people have realized that one of the quickest ways to make big bucks is to produce lies and fabrications in books that purport to be historical. And this is what is happening with what I call the anti-Putin industry. If you cannot meet your opponent on rational and logical ground, then produce deception and lies so that readers will never understand the real issue. Listen to this big lie by Jewish writer Garry Kasparov:

“Putin fomented a war in Eastern Ukraine and became the first person to annex sovereign foreign territory by force since Saddam Hussein in Kuwait.”[4]

If a third grader writes this on an exam or a paper, you should quickly take him by the side and lovingly correct him. But statements like this have become received wisdom. And it is all the more disturbing when you realize that major publishers allow these things to flow in the culture.

In order for Kasparov’s ideological equation to work, he has to exclude the invasion of Iraq by the United States, which is still fresh on everyone’s mind. Throughout his book, he insinuates that Hussein and Gaddafi were dictators,[5] but Kasparov struggles mightily to defend this essentially Zionist position.

In fact, the United States invaded or had covert operations in countries like Mexico, Dominican Republic, Cuba, Panama, Yugoslavia, Guatemala, Turkey, China, El Salvador, the Philippines, Puerto Rico, Korea, Iran, Vietnam, Egypt, Germany, Laos, Indonesia, Cambodia, Chile, Angola, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria, Grenada, Honduras, Bolivia, Virgin Islands, Liberia, etc. Kasparov never discusses this at all because his ideology only works inside his primitive mind. His statement here is not something that can be objectively defended.

Kasparov shot himself in the toes when he said:

“Anyone who says they are still uncertain about Putin’s true nature at this point must be joking, a fool, or tricking us. There is no reason to waste time on jokers or fools, however useful they may be in Putin’s marked deck of cards, but tricksters must be watched carefully. For at least a decade now, those who defend Putin either have something to gain from it or they are dangerously ignorant.”[6]

 First of all, we are not defending Putin as a person by any stretch of imagination. We are defending morality and practical reason and those who aspire to pursue the truth wherever it may lead. Putin obviously is challenging the New World Order.

In contrast, the New World Order, as we have argued elsewhere, has no interest in the truth. In fact, it is one of the main reasons Putin has literally exposed it and even suggested that its agents like Kasparov worship Satan and are on “the path to degradation.”

Kasparov admits that Putin reached out to George W. Bush numerous times. Right after 9/11, Putin picked up the phone and called Bush and said: “Good will triumph over evil. I want you to know that in this struggle, we will stand together.” Putin, Kasparov writes, was “the first foreign leader to call Bush on 9/11.” But how does Kasparov respond to Putin’s generosity?

“With two phone calls probably totaling sixty seconds of his time and costing him absolutely nothing, Putin has cemented himself with the Bush 43 administration as a friend and ally….

“Those 9/11 phone calls to Bush were preemptive strikes, a targeted maneuver by Putin to undermine potential American influence against his crackdowns at home.”[7]

Is this supposed to be a serious book? When Putin speaks and tells much of the world about his new plan, no one believes him. When he lowers his standards and reaches out to New World Order agents, members of the Dreadful Few like Kasparov come up and say that Putin is bluffing.

What do these people really want? What will actually satisfy their essentially diabolical appetite? What will it take them to make a rational and cogent point? Don’t they know that crazy or incoherent statements make thinking people angry?

Kasparov continues to burry himself in the sand by mentioning Alexander Solzhenitsyn positively. But Kasparov ought to know that Solzhenitsyn highly praised Putin for his strong leadership. Kasparov writes that he gave a lecture in Washington

“urging Congress and the Obama administration not to reward Putin for destroying Russian civil society and for persecuting those who exposed his crimes.”[8]

Kasparov moves on to add that Putin “was returning Russia to totalitarian darkness…Putin’s war was against Russian democracy and anyone who might stand in the way of his mission to destroy it.”[9] Solzhenitsyn would have taken a different point of view.

“Putin inherited a ransacked and bewildered country, with a poor and demoralized people,” said Solzhenitsyn, “And he started to do what was possible, a slow and gradual restoration. These efforts were not noticed, nor appreciated, immediately. In any case, one is hard-pressed to find examples in history when steps by one country to restore its strength were met favorably by other governments.”[10]

I am really confused here. How can New World Order agents condemn Vladimir Putin and then praise Solzhenitsyn who praised Vladimir Putin? New World Order agents say that Putin wants to destroy Russia and challenge the West, but Solzhenitsyn says that Putin wants to rebuild Russia and bring the West back to its roots, which obviously is Logos. Who is telling the truth here?

Well, one way to find out is to look at consistency, logical arguments, and practical reason. Kasparov has already given enough indication that he is not interested in the truth. For example, he said that he was “protesting the sentencing of Pussy Riot, three members of the all-girl punk group that had been convicted for filming an anti-Putin protest inside a Moscow church.”[11]

Kasparov and other anti-Putin writers such as Masha Gessen need to answer Putin’s challenge here. “If the band had defiled a sacred place in Israel,” says Putin, wouldn’t the religious people there go up in flame and rightly demand that the band be prosecuted and charged accordingly? Don’t the Dreadful Few complain ad nauseam that Nazis used to defile or desecrate their synagogues?[12]

Don’t people like Pamela Geller go berserk whenever they see a swastika spray-painted at a synagogue? Doesn’t Robert Spencer inveigh against “Muslims” who want to desecrate Jewish holy places?[13] Doesn’t the swastika seem to represent the angel of death for those people?[14]

Moreover, how can Kasparov and the whole Zionist media—including CNN, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Huffington Post, etc.—did not mention the fact that that members of the Pussy Riot “staged a real orgy in the Moscow Zoological Museum to mock the meaninglessness of Russian elections”?[15]

Why did CNN only show a video in which “Pussy Riot members were beaten by Cossacks”?[16] Is that good journalism? Why did Kasparov fail to point out that another member by the name of Yelena Kostyleva “unwrapped a frozen chicken in a supermarket, put it into her vagina and shoplifted it”?[17]

Is performing a sex act with a frozen chicken at a public place art? Is that the feminism that Clark University professor Valerie Sperling is defending in her book Sex, Politics, and Putin: Political Legitimacy in Russia? Sperling is well aware of these covert activities, but she still maintains throughout her book that Putin is the bad guy.[18]

Members of the Pussy Riot were admirers of Anatolii Osmolovskii and Aleksandr Brener, “artists” of the 1990s. What were some of their greatest art work?

“In 1991, Osmolovskii’s group, ETI had arranged their bodies on Red Square to spell out the obscenity ‘khui’ (dick), violating the (then-Soviet) law against using obscene language in public spaces.

“Oleg Kulik, another performance artist, surprised the Russian public in the mid-1990s by removing all of his clothes and pretending in public to be a dog (leashed in some instances by Brener).

“The profanity and references to bodily functions that pervade the lyrics to ‘Putin Pissed Himself’ thus joined a tradition of Russian performance art…The Russian Orthodox religion is described as a ‘hard penis’ (zhestokogo penisa)…”[19]

The same group had a song in which they declared, “Rebellion in Russia—riot, riot!”

“The song’s conclusion refers to the ‘sexist regime’ as a ‘flock of bitches’ (staia suk) and imagines them begging forgiveness from the ‘feminist wedge,’ implying a relationship of domination reversed…

The male-dominated regime was characterized and derogated in a misogynist fashion as female (‘bitches), and Putin, despite his reputed masculine strength, was demasculinized and diminished to the status of a child.”[20]

Nadia Plungian, a member of the Moscow Feminist Group, defended the chicken thing by saying that “despite its incredible formal novelty,” the act was a “decision by a group of men to use a woman’s body as a container.”[21]

Some ideas are so crazy that only a moron will believe them.


batbale

E. Michael Jones: “The Jewish Messiah is, in other words, Superman, which is to say a caricature of the real Messiah that they rejected. The superhero is the Jewish Messiah who brings about tikkun olam, the healing of the world, at a time of economic crisis, but in a non-communist way that did not jeopardize his standing as a good American.”

If actress Maggie Gyllenhaal is right, that Batman “is like the Pussy Riot,”[22] then E. Michael Jones was right all along, that “the Jewish superhero is also the Antichrist.”[23] By being the Antichrist, Batman and Superman and Spiderman and Iron Man and other Golem, according to this premise, are fundamentally anti-Logos but are superficially saviors or heroes who aspire to do good.

Moreover, in order to be effective, those superheroes have to be assimilated. “Superman’s Moses-like origin and his Midwestern WASP-ish persona are widely regarded as a symbol of Jewish assimilation.”[24]

Another important point is that the Pussy Riot and the characters in the superhero genre were both forged by people whose subversive ideologies were to attack the fundamental principles of morality and practical reason. So, we should give Gyllenhaal, who is Jewish, some credit for saying that if you remove Batman’s mask, you will inexorably see the ideology of the Pussy Riot, whose members were Trotskyites.[25]

In essence, superhero characters and the Pussy Riot are part of the New World Order, which means that Logos will be directly or indirectly attacked, dismissed, ignored, or made fun of. Put simply, Kasparov and the Pussy Riot have a kindred spirit because they are both essentially at odds with the social and moral order.

Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, a lead member of the Pussy Riot, defended her revolutionary act by saying that the band “committed no crime.”

In other words, having an orgy in the Timiryazev State Biology Museum in Moscow, going to the altar of Cathedral of Christ and pronouncing blasphemous lines such as “Shit, shit, holy shit…Mother of God, Virgin, become a feminist,” and placing a chicken in your vagina at a public supermarket are all compatible with the social and moral order.

When asked the question, “What does Pussy Riot hope for?,” Tolokonnikova responded, “A revolution in Russia.”[26]

We know that the Pussy Riot is a Trotskyite band. So, does that mean that those who support the band are by definition supporting Trotskyism? Does that mean that Kasparov, Masha Gessen, Ben Shapiro, Madonna, Paul McCartney, Sting, Bjork, and Hollywood celebrities and entertainers who support them are also closet Trotskyites?

Madonna, Bjork and other puppets may not officially pledge allegiance to Trotsky or may not even know that there was a revolutionary called Trotsky, but they are certainly following the New World Order agenda, which is essentially Talmudic, diabolical, and contrary to all mankind. If you doubt this statement, then let us hear from Masha Gessen. She declared back in 2012:

“I agree that we should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it is a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. . . .

“Fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we’re going to do with marriage when we get there, because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change, and again, I don’t think it should exist.”[27]

We are being buried beneath an avalanche of contradictions here. If the institution of marriage should not exist, does the statement that people “should have the right to marry” make any sense at all? Why can’t Gessen come to her senses and realize that she needs to think twice about making crazy statements like that?

Now let us take this to the next logical conclusion. If the institution of marriage shouldn’t exist, then what should exist? Why did Gessen fail to flesh out the standards for us? Would it be all right for a grown man to consensually have sex little boys and girls? Was it all right for David Epstein of the University of Columbia to consensually have sex with his 24-year old daughter?

And if it is immoral, why haven’t Woody Allen and Roman Polanski been arrested for molesting little girls? Why the double standard?[28]

You see, New World Order agents are doing Putin a big favor by upholding patently incoherent ideas. This was one reason why Putin asked BBC journalist John Simpson, “Have you any common sense at all?”

Well done, Mr. Putin. Please, continue to put the fear of God in the New World Order. Show NWO agents that we are not for sale.


[1] See Melissa Katsoulis, Literary Hoaxes: An Eye-Opening History of Famous Frauds (New York: Skyhorse Publishing, 2009); J. S. Weiner, The Piltdown Forgery (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).

[2] See for example Bart D. Ehrman, Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code: A Historian Reveals What We Really Know about Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and Constantine (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004); Laura Miller, “The Da Vinci crock,” Salon, December 30, 2004.

[3] I was teaching in the U.S. when The Da Vinci Code came out. I remember one student came up to me and asked, “Have you read The Da Vinci Code?” I was never a fan of popular novels because most of the writers are there for the money and basically, in my “unbiased” opinion, there is no critical thinking in books written by Stephen King, Dean Koontz, James Patterson, Danielle Steel, Clive Cussler, David Baldacci, etc. So, I responded, “No, I have not read the book. What’s up?” “Brown makes a number of assertions that really bother me. If they are true, then it will change a lot of things you believe in.” “Does he present evidence for the assertions?,” I asked. “No, because it is a novel.” “OK. Then you have your answer. Why should you worry about something that is by definition fiction? If I say that your grandfather was a terrorist, am I not under the obligation to provide evidence for this bold assertion?” “But he said the descriptions are accurate. Why don’t you read it and tell me what you think?” I reluctantly accepted the challenge, and it confirmed my suspicion about popular novels.

[4] Garry Kasparov, Winter Is coming: Why Vladimir Putin and the Enemies of the Free World Must be Stopped (New York: Public Affairs, 2015), x.

[5] Ibid., 95.

[6] Ibid., 88.

[7] Ibid., 98, 105.

[8] Ibid., 103.

[9] Ibid., 103, 105.

[10] Quoted in Peter Finn, “Toward end, Solzhenitsyn embraced Putin’s Russia,” Boston Globe, August 5, 2008.

[11] Ibid., 119.

[12] Martin Gilbert, The Holocaust: A History of the Jews of Europe During the Second World War (New York: Henry Holt & Company, 1985), 30, 123; Svetlana Boym, The Future of Nostalgia (New York: Basic Books, 2001), 199; Jane S. Gerber, The Jews of Spain: A History of the Sephardic Experience (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1992), 252.

[13] Robert Spencer, The Incomplete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran (Washington: Regnery Publishing, 2009), 216.

[14] Sewell Chan, “Swastikas Painted on 2 Brooklyn Synagogues,” NY Times, September 25, 2007.

[15] Nick Sturdee, “Don’t raise the bridge: Voina, Russia’s art terrorists,” Guardian, April 12, 2011.

[16] Ivan Watson, “Video shows Pussy Riot members beaten by Cossacks,” CNN, February 20, 2014.

[17] Vladimir Kozlov, “Pussy Riot Mocked by Chicken-Costumed Putin Supporters in Moscow,” Hollywood Reporter, February 21, 2014.

[18] Valerie Sperling, Sex, Politics, and Putin: Political Legitimacy in Russia (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015), 228.

[19] Ibid., 232.

[20] Ibid.

[21] Ibid., 229.

[22] Ryan Buxton, “Maggie Gyllenhaal Explains How Batman Is Like Pussy Riot,” Huffington Post, July 29, 2014.

[23] E. Michael Jones, “Wall Street Rises,” Culture Wars, October 2012.

[24] Quoted in ibid.

[25] “Interview with Pussy Riot Leader: ‘I Love Russia, But I Hate Putin,’” Spiegel International, September 3, 2012.

[26] Ibid.

[27] Quoted in Ian Tuttle, “State Dept LGBT Speaker: We Don’t Want Gay Marriage; We Want No Marriage,” National Review, June 20, 2014.

[28] For a good article on this, see E. Michael Jones, “Woody Allen and the Double Standard,” Culture Wars, March 2014.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on January 18, 2016, With 12491 Reads Filed under World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

21 Responses to "Fight Club: Vladimir Putin Continues to Slay the New World Order Intellectually"

  1. hestroy  January 25, 2016 at 2:46 am

    Glory to Ukraine! Glory to imbeciles! Your nazi Ukraine is the perfect example how the country should be managed, right?

    BTW, most people doesn’t agree with mass media and even former anti-russians are now pro-russians.

    And everybody hates nazi “ukies”.

  2. Aziz Khalfan  January 23, 2016 at 11:30 am

    Yea.

  3. drbhelthi  January 20, 2016 at 1:04 am

    How dare Jonas E. and Preston J. repeatedly publish articles that document the historical, perverted, anti-human values of “Judaism” ? Obviously, the Khazarians acquired more than the “Jew” label from the remnants of Judah. Basically assimilated were the anti-human values of “Judaism,” which classify “Goyim” as farm animals to be herded, as evidenced by the Apartheid of the Khazarian contingency.
    One wonders what occurred 7,000-6,000 BC that produced the Torah and other written works? Also, the group of “theologians” that continue to teach that “the world” was created about 6,000 B.C.. Do they think that God created the huge stones and hewed stone structures, then submitted them to an aging process that showed their age to be in the millions or hundred thousands of years ? Thank you, Jonas E., Preston J., other VT authors and commenters, all of whom provide insight into our current reality.

    • jones  January 20, 2016 at 3:19 am

      Dear drbhelthi,
      Thank you for your restrained cynicism which i could not muster before my first cup of coffee; and thank you to the VT warriors for laying bare the gut-wrenching topics of this dark age that was first communicated to us in the body language of our mothers and then by the whispers of our grandmothers whose goodness resonated within our cellular structure as the eternal spark of all that is.

  4. LC  January 19, 2016 at 8:09 pm

    Mr. Alexis +VT Folks:::

    Something you may already know about is priceless research of Lloyd Pye concluding that about 250,000 years back the Annunakies genetically engineered Homo Sapiens and locked their brains @ 10% max-usage capacity!!!!
    Adam & Eve were genetically engineered & started breeding in South Africa. They were black.

    We all have black ancestry. ++ Darwin & similar BS totally debunked in: .
    YouTube:::
    Lloyd Pye – Everything You Know Is Wrong
    Or link in browser:::
    youtube.com/watch?v=pe6DN1OoxjE
    Description::
    Seminal lecture by Lloyd Pye on our origins and enslavement as a species. Strongly recommended presentation.

    Recent videos with his name show he was probably murdered with induced cancer!!!!

    • HexFiendsOfJewNeurosalem  January 20, 2016 at 12:31 am

      you see this is the matriarchial propaganda that humans are just a cruel grit a grain of sand thrown in the miraculous clokwork that the ecosystem of this globe is, we cant be something emanating from this enormous holy scripture that is written in microscopic letters, but in spite of this all we must to always seek the way in our heart to be less of a grain of sand in the eye of Mother Nature!

    • drbhelthi  January 20, 2016 at 1:28 am

      One wonders how long is the list of CIA victims who have received the cancer virus injection?

    • LC  January 20, 2016 at 9:26 pm

      CIA cancer murders – Probably thousands::::
      If you put in YouTube::: Lloyd Pye murdered

      the man who talks about it discusses Chavez murder + Ruby. He also said Oswald was to carry the cancer to Cuba to put in Castro’s food.
      Couple years back a woman came out with her book + many interviews. She was Oswald’s girlfriend who worked in CIA cancer making labs!!!! She discussed Oswald’s CIA job but I don’t remember now!
      VT authors also interviewed her & found her real & their stuff is probably still online.

      BTW::: I had heard that Steve Jobs was also infected with such cancer!!!.
      Possible reason::: Apple had $100+ billion cash outside US & RKM wanted to have it by threats but he wouldn’t give in!!!!

    • LC  January 23, 2016 at 8:07 pm

      @ Hex…..

      Don’t believe in Ancient Aliens? Watch this I Dare You. pt 1

      Copy-paste above title or its below link in browser:::

      youtube.com/watch?v=G8IOhoF_jBM

      & take a 20,000 year back-in-time-trip with Klaus Donna who shows some of the absolutely amazing artifacts that he has found across the world
      showing other types of humans including CONE-HEADS & even Reptilians which we know exist as Royal & Elite families such as the English Royals as documented by ARIZONA WILDER also in YouTube.

      ++Hypothesis of today’s humans having been created with genetic engineering couple hundred thousand years ago makes most sense of anything else I have yet heard & from multiple researchers NOT just the above man who was murdered recently.

      I am pretty sure our brain-function is locked down genetically & nowadays its done with radio waves & electronics + GMO & other poisons !!!!
      Reptilians are in control. always have been!!!!

      Here’s best proof of extinct ancient giants in
      YouTube::::
      Giant Foot Print 200 Million Yrs Old – South Africa
      Or link:::
      youtube.com/watch?v=dRuxw-nZoJw

  5. Dan  January 19, 2016 at 3:11 pm

    In Two Hundred Years Together, Ch. 25 “Accusing Russia [!],” Solzhenitsyn calls the Jews’ genocidal Russian bashing “Jewish repentance,” dating this latest assault to about 1970, when the first Jewish émigrés reached the West. How ungrateful can the Ruusian people be, blaming the poor, misunderstood Jews for the Red Terror when all the latter tried to do was bring the “Augean Stables” and “filthy pigsty” of Russian life into the Workers’ Paradise of world communism? At least our military leaders and political class are grateful and sharp enough to know that the almost entirely Jewish CPUSA and successor neocon movement would not even think of morally subverting, politically corrupting, and economically enslaving America, or wrecking our military to serve Israel and destroy Russia and all of Western Europe while they’re at it. Why, the proof is everywhere that Hollywood, the MSM, Wall Street, the porn-as-entertainment industry–I could go on forever–are the very bedrock of what the Founding Fathers had in mind.

  6. HexFiendsOfJewNeurosalem  January 19, 2016 at 12:35 pm

    hey dont just diss batman, i cant think of a more relevant cultural character, he embodies the morale of the tale of the 20th century and especially its part called ww2… could approach from many perspective but at the core of the cultural message is the truth which many even now in the 21th fear to see/recognize/say out loud or have an interest to lie about it… the most downright giveaway is their symbols they wear, the S of superman, the extravagant cosmopolitan alphamale character like the ones from old testament, who is big, musculous consumer, ideal of the hellenic/latin culture (who if you look back far enough derive from the children of Dhanu, the Sea People or Sea Dragons, who Indra exiled from India!) the decadence, the ubermensch=chosen of god, the SUN=star=swastika, the Bomb that Bangs Bigger, and on the other hand the CROSScent shape bat (maybe a ‘psy’?)

    • HexFiendsOfJewNeurosalem  January 19, 2016 at 12:37 pm

      Batman who seeks to avoid harming his enemies, who in his simple black mantle, resembling a crusader knight or monk from some medieval order, who helps the weak but being humble, is a symbol for the last stand of chivalric virtue in the sheeppen of an urban cosmopolitan modernizing society of Gotham (being the black sheep even maybe) who is not like a shady western character whom all men fear and all women are at his feet, but tries to spare the life of his enemis with less lethal weapons, hes the character who kids look up to not for his exceptional lineage/genetics but for the gadgets and practicall wits, and wisdom

    • HexFiendsOfJewNeurosalem  January 19, 2016 at 12:43 pm

      superman is clearly less Jovial, less hairy (clean shaved and fancy haircut) not womanizing but some kinda tamed conservative Hercules…

    • HexFiendsOfJewNeurosalem  January 19, 2016 at 1:10 pm

      and well if you even know what ‘ind’ means in hindu it really makes you feel like the whole sh*t coming apart at the sewing before your eyes…

  7. davor  January 19, 2016 at 8:42 am

    That phone call remains troublesome, even in-time not knowing who did it, Putin should have realized the false flag in subsequent USA/UK military operations (and has for sure) and should have adopted some kind of Hague prosecution style for western highest profile officials, that are faking and breaking every possible international law to get to the vast riches of the Caspian sea. He could have supported the Kuala Lumpur tribunal, or Lavrov could have just mentioned it on occasions, that Russia has indications blah-blah of an anti muslim alliance. Cause that Malaysia snowball has hit them and hit them hard and lawless in Eastern Ukraine. So far he has adopted only new military doctrine towards NATO, and only of recent. And which NATO? The Lithuania-Latvia-Poland NATO glove bandages. Really sad.
    As for the superheroes, many of them Hollywood characters are adopting some characteristics of Christ (walking over water etc.)

  8. cynthiamaccioli  January 19, 2016 at 7:39 am

    Ya gotta believe in someone, and I believe in Putin. Time will tell if my sympathies for him are well founded. I’ve spread the word as best I can and carry the ire of my communiques upon my shoulders, as most are not believed, and I am looked upon as a deluded, pathetic conspiracy theorist. To that I just laugh, ask intelligent questions of my detractors, and wait for them to parrot Fox news because that is the best they can do. Logic doesn’t exist in their world. What amazes me is that morality plays no role either.

    • LC  January 19, 2016 at 8:35 pm

      From Russia with love in
      YouTube:::
      Такого как Путин / One Like Putin, English Subs

      Or its link in browser:::
      youtube.com/watch?v=zk_VszbZa_s

      From Vladi direct!!!!

  9. ayelyahbenjamin  January 19, 2016 at 2:13 am

    there is the real and there is the counterfeit….imposters run for cover alongside make-it-up-as-we-go media ….real deal President Putin left them for dust ……actions speak

  10. Worker Bee  January 18, 2016 at 11:49 pm

    “Anyone who says they are still uncertain about Putin’s true nature at this point must be joking, a fool, or tricking us. – Kasparov

    Some of are uncertain, in that Putin seems almost too good to be true, and we could find out that he is just KZM controlled opposition.

    What truth is there to the contention that Putin was taught by rabbis as a child and still has Zionist sympathies? Or was that just to throw people off the scent, and buy Putin time?

  11. Preston James, Ph.D  January 18, 2016 at 10:23 pm

    Excellent work once again. Thank you and please keep it coming.

  12. Martin Maloney  January 18, 2016 at 9:24 pm

    Why did Kasparov fail to point out that another member by the name of Yelena Kostyleva “unwrapped a frozen chicken in a supermarket, put it into her vagina and shoplifted it”?

    Kinky is tickling with a feather; perverted is using the whole chicken.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH