Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War. He is a disabled veteran and has worked on veterans and POW issues for decades.

Gordon Duff is an accredited diplomat and is generally accepted as one of the top global intelligence specialists. He manages the world's largest private intelligence organization and regularly consults with governments challenged by security issues.

Gordon Duff has traveled extensively, is published around the world and is a regular guest on TV and radio in more than "several" countries. He is also a trained chef, wine enthusiast, avid motorcyclist and gunsmith specializing in historical weapons and restoration. Business experience and interests are in energy and defense technology.

He is co-host of the popular VT Radio show Jim and Gordie Show.

Visit Gordon Duff's YouTube Channel


View Latest Posts >>>

VT Science: UFT, Apollo and Keshe

Our attempts to explain observations of inexplicable anti-gravity Keshe technology ...attempts

lido_678

…by Jeff Smith, VT Science Editor

Dr. Keshe

Dr. Keshe

[ Note:  The notes here are in response to observations tied to Keshe related projects.  VT personnel are active in working with the Keshe Foundation on the delivery of several unique technologies related to not just energy production and medical care but touch on basic physics and space flight as well.

VT affiliates in technology related industries work with conventional science and hold chairs at a number of major universities, including MIT and the University of California along with key positions at the European Space Agency.

That said, their experiences meeting with Keshe who refuses to use broadly accepted scientific language though Keshe himself is a conventionally trained physicist has led to organizational challenges.

It is our job here to be skeptics, not cheerleaders.  If Keshe technology works as promised, and thus far some of it demonstrates that possibility already, the world as we know it is at an end.  Energy will be free, many threatening diseases will be a thing of the past and space flight will be available for our children.

That said, we will be looking for opportunities to bridge the gap of understanding and as we believe is the right thing to do, subject Keshe science to rigorous but unprejudiced examination.  Toward that end, consider this a welcome matJS ]

____________

lobaido20

The Unified Field Theory

Keshe in the lab

Dr. Keshe in the lab

[ Editor’s Note: Dear readers, while this is a challenging topic to get a handle on, Jeff has done an excellent job and I have done a magazine layout to help make it more readable as it is challenging material for a general audience.

For us non-nuclear physicists, do not worry about understanding all of it. It is very rewarding to understand the key points, and the most important is “magnetic buoyancy”.

It is what enables flying saucers to fly, and this is not science fiction, but the real science of how it works…pretty cool stuff. But it is a two step process, starting with the unified field theory. It is not important that you understand exactly how it works, but that it exists, and that basically how the two are related, as then the magnetic buoyancy part will flow easily from that.

VT is blessed by having a talent network of great depth and breadth, with more than a few Mensa’s here, several of whom are regulars. So were we may seem to go off the farm from time to time, not only the world but the universe is our farm…and yes we will want to share with you from time to time the what some of our projects involve.

Don’t sweat it if you have to reread the article a few times to absorb more or to have the light turn on. I do. It is worth the time as our goal here is to increase the baseline understanding of some of these nuclear science concepts so other topics can be discussed in the future, ones that we know from past experience require stepping stones to cross over the creek.

Don’t miss the “Foo Fighters” mention at the end, the early days of hiding the experimentation of this science behind the UFO sighting smokescreen when ironically magnetic buoyancy would be the key stepping stone to flying saucer aerodynamics.

And yes, VT people have not only seen these on occasion, in hangars, but touched them…magnetic buoyancy on a much larger scale than that designed to give the WWII aerial illumination flares more hang time, proving once again that big things often have small beginnings... Jim W. Dean ]

____________

– First published  …   January 28, 2016

A theory that describes two or more of the four interactions (electromagnetic, gravitational, weak, and strong) previously described by separate theories.

__________

Mathis

Mathis

According to M. Mathis and other modern theorists a unified field equation only has to unify two separate fields in order to qualify as a unified field. It does not have to unify all four fields. Both Newton and Coulomb formulas are unified field equations. That is why the two equations look so much alike. They are basically the inverse of each other.

However the two equations unify the same thing in different ways. Newton was unaware of Maxwell’s E/M field, so he did not realize that his equation contained two fields , “E/M” and “G”, (electro-magnetic and gravity).

Coulomb working on electrostatics, pre-Maxwell , likewise did not realize that his equation also included gravity. So the E/M field is hidden inside Newton’s equation, and the gravitational field is hidden inside Coulomb’s equation. Both Maxwell and Einstein missed this unification.

If we look at Newton’s equation first…F = GMm/r2 … we learn that this equation has been around since 1687. But how can you get two fields from one when only mass is involved? Well, remember that Newton invented the modern idea of mass with this equation. But he let the variable “M” stand for what we now call mass. In the process he compressed the equation too much.

Not knowing about E/M fields and atomic structure he made the equation as simple as possible, but in this form, it is so simple, it hides the fundamental basis of mass. If Newton had written the equation it would have looked like this:

F= G(DV)(dv)/r2

51InbsDKM4L._SX384_BO1,204,203,200_

Writing each mass as a separate density and volume. We would have had a much better understanding of what mass really is, Mass is not a fundamental characteristic, like density or volume is. To know what mass is, you have to know both density and volume. But to know what volume is, you only need to know length. Likewise with density. Density, like volume, can only be measured with a yardstick.

If you say that density and volume can be measured with a yardstick, so can mass, since mass is defined by density and volume. But mass requires both measurements of density and volume. However density and volume do not require mass in order to measure them. Once we have separated out density and volume in Newton’s equation, we can assign density to one field and volume to the other field.

So we now have two fields instead of one. If you let volume define the gravitational field and we let density define the E/M field. Both fields then fall off with the square of the radius, because each field is spherical. A spherical field diminishes by the inverse square law, just look at the equation for the surface area of a sphere:

S = 4πr2

If you double the radius, you quadruple the surface area, or  if you double the radius, you also divide or reduce the E/M field density by 4. If the E/M field density is produced by a spherical emission, then it will diminish by the inverse square law.

This imply’s that gravity is now only dependent on the E/M field radius. If gravity is no longer a function of density but only a function of volume, then gravity is not a function of mass. Now that we have separated out the variables and assigned density to the E/M field, gravity is no longer a function of density, it is now a function of volume. If gravity is a function of volume alone, then with a sphere, gravity is a function of radius, and nothing else.

It is now apparent that only the combined field is a function of mass. In Newton’s original equation the total combined Gravitational  Force field is a function of mass. But gravity is not a function of mass. It is a function of radius.

Density is now assigned to the atoms radiated E/M field. Therefore Newton’s equation is not telling us the density of the bodies in the field, it is telling us the density of the emitted or radiated E/M field. Both are a function of the other. If you have denser matter it will emit or radiate a denser E/M field. But, as a matter of mechanics, the variable “D” only applies to the density of the emitted E/M field. It is the density of the particles emitted by the matter that creates the gravitational field.

So what is “G”?

“G” is the transformation between the two fields. It is a scaling constant or the gradient ratio that exist between the two fields.  One field called “gravity” is determined by the radius of the object and the other “E/M” field is determined by the density of the emitted particles. However these two fields are not operating on the same scale.

To put both fields into the same equation, we must scale one field to the other.  Since we are using both fields to find a combined force, we must discover how force is transmitted in each field. In the E/M field, the force is transmitted by direct contact of the electrons and the atoms. In the “gravity” field it is transmitted by the atoms itself.

Now that gravity is a function of volume alone, and it is not a function of the particle size, it becomes a function of the atoms that make up matter itself. Therefore, G is a scaling constant between the size of the atoms and the size of the atoms E/M field.

To  put it in another way, the function of G is to reduce the volume down to the level of the density, so that they may be multiplied together to find the combined force. Without a scaling constant, the volume would be too large to combine directly with the density, and we would get the wrong answer. This is if we assume that the particles involved in the E/M transmission are about “G” times the size of the atom.

Part two – Coulomb’s equation: 

F = kq1q2/r2

Newton's own copy of his Principia with hand written correction nots

Newton’s own copy of his Principia with hand written correction notes

One hundred years after Newton, Coulomb’s field equation comes along. In Coulomb’s equation we have charges instead of masses, and the constant is different, but otherwise the equation looks the same as Newton’s.

Physicists have always wondered why the equations are so similar, but until now, no one really knew why. No one understood that they are both the same equation using different symbols.With Newton’s equation, mass consists of density and volume and with Coulomb’s equation, it is field charge.

When corrected Coulomb’s constant “C” is now 9 x 109 and Newtons constant for “G” is -9 x 109. The reason for the correction is because Coulomb used pith balls for his calculations and not protons. So Coulombs constant of K = 6.7 x109 is multiplied by 1.4 to now get K= 9 x109 or the mirror image of Newtons G. 1.4 is the correction factor.

Coulomb’s constant is another scaling factor just like “G”. Instead of scaling smaller, “K” scales larger. Coulomb’s constant moves us up from Bohr’s radius of the atom to the radius of larger objects like Coulomb’s spheres. It turns the single electron charge into a field charge. But where is the gravitational field in Coulomb’s equation?

If we study charge, we find that it has the same fundamental dimensions as mass. The stat-coulomb has the dimensions of M 1/2 L3/2T -1. This gives the total charge of two particles the cgs dimension of ML3/ T2 . But mass has the dimensions L3 / T2, which makes the total charge M2. So we can treat Coulomb’s charges just like Newton’s masses if we write the equations like this:   Coulomb:  F = K(DV)(dv)/r2    and   Newton:    F= G(DV)(dv)/r2.

Charles de Coulomb

Charles de Coulomb

Once again, the volume is the gravitational field and the density is the E/M field. The single electron is in the emitted field of the nucleus, and D gives us the density of that field. But this time the expressed field is the E/M field and the hidden field is gravity. So we have to scale the electromagnetic field up to the field level that we are measuring with our instruments.

If constants K and G had been the same number, all this would have been discovered a lot earlier. It would have been easy to see that Coulomb’s equation was just the inverse of Newton’s equation. But because the constants were not the same number, the problem was hidden.

In scaling up and scaling down, you cannot simply reverse the scales. It is more complex than that. In scaling down, you go from the molecular size to the electron size and in scaling up, you go from atomic size to our own macro size.

Since the two fields are always in vector opposition and gravity by itself is a function of radius alone, then the gravitational force is much stronger at the smaller or atomic end of the scales and it is much weaker at larger or macro end of the scales. So as the radius of the molecule expands the effect of gravity becomes less and if you shrink its radius, the effect of gravity becomes greater.

The Bohr radius, symbolized a , is the mean radius of the orbit of an electron around the nucleus of a hydrogen atom at its ground state (lowest-energy level). The value of this radius is a physical constant; a is approximately equal to 5.29177 x 10 -11 meter (m).

Part Three. Anti Gravity and the Lunar Landing Module.

Dorenberger came over from the German V-2 rocket program via Paperclip, which was much lager than a scientific program

Dorenberger came over from the German V-2 rocket program via Paperclip, which was much lager than a scientific program

According to this theory if all you half to do is increase the radius of the atom and it weighs less. Then how do you do that artificially? It’s simple and it has been done many times since about 1898 by many people including J.J. Thompson. Tesla, T. Townsend Brown, Walter Dornberger / Larry Bell,  and by the NASA /Apollow lunar lander weight loss program along with many others unknown.

We will start with Larry Bell’s and Walter Dornberger’s “Gadget”. The so called “Dornberger Gadget” as it was referred to was basically a spring electroscope. It was a simple device recovered from the ashes of Germany’s WW2 rocket program. It was brought back to the US under project Paper Clip and experimented with by Larry Bell and Walter Dornberger at Bell Aircraft corporation way back in the 1950’s.

All it was was a very simple physics experiment involving a glass vacuum bell with a wire wrapped around its exterior and attached to the top of the bell chamber. One end was connected to a set of pith-balls and small lead fishing weights suspended from a spring and the other end was connected to a very high voltage (over 30 kv) DC power supply.

At first when the high voltage was turned on under atmospheric pressure, only the pith balls would expand, just like with a standard electroscope. When the vacuum pump was then turned on and a hard vacuum was created the pith balls would drop back to there un charged state. This was due to Bremsstrahlung losses that were caused by the high conductivity of the hard vacuum, forming Berkland currents or filaments between the pith balls and the glass vacuum chambers walls, creating charge loss. No other effect was seen.

Bremsstrahlung radiation is the radiation given off by a charged particle (most often an electron) due to its acceleration caused by an electric field of another charged particle (most often a proton or an atomic nucleus).

However when a wire was warped around the vacuum chamber and also charged to the same high voltage level as the pith balls and the air was pumped out forming a very hard vacuum. The spring holding both the lead weights and the pith balls would retract proving a loss in weight.

But it would only work in a hard vacuum such as exists on the surface of the moon. It would not work on the earth due to air ionization drawing off the accumulated charge. However this effect could be scaled up to larger objects such as the Lunar Landing Module placed on the surface of the moon.

This was NASA’s dirty little secret.  How they really got off the moon. It was impossible for a 500 lb. kick motor with only 90 seconds of flue to lift a 3,000 lb. space craft up to it orbital height of 50,000 feet in 90 seconds or less. Even though the spacecraft only weighed about 1/6th of this weight on the moon or about 500 lbs its self. You would still half to reduce its weight  by another 250 moon lbs in order to get a 1.5 G acceleration fast enough to go up 50,000 feet in 90 seconds or less.

The problem was solved by  Larry Bell and Walter Dornberger’s Gadget under the cover of the NASA lunar weight loss program. On the surface of the earth the atmospheric gases would short out the effect. This is why the LM could only be tested in a full vacuum chamber or only on the surface of the moon.

Larry Bell with Chuck Yeager

Larry Bell with Chuck Yeager

This effect was first discovered by J.J. Thompson way back in 1898 when he discovered the electron playing around with cathode ray tubes. The presence of gas in a cathode ray tube shields the ability of an electrostatic or magnetic fields from deflecting a cathode ray or electron beam. But under a hard vacuum it can easily be moved by a very small force.

This effect was then re-discovered and worked on back in Germany during the 1920’s. The German army then militarized it during the 1930’s where it was placed under Walter Dornberger’s control. After the war Larry Bell recruited Dornberger and further developed the technology under the  cover of the NACA, pre NASA.

The only other known researcher that work on this effect in the US was T. Townsend Brown who independently also discovered the effect. Brown however did not understand the electron disconnect problem that shorted out the effect. If he had simply warped a high voltage wire around one of his cathode ray tubes history would halve come out different.

By creating an electrostatic shield that produces an electron disconnect with gravity, also called  a Debye lair or shield around the vacuum chamber it stops the radiation losses and blocks out the earths magnetic lines of force, creating what is called “Magnetic Buoyancy”.

Another way of putting it. Heat or plasma so dislikes gravity. Enough so that it repels and runs away from it. IE if you increase the radius of the hot plasma gas, gravity begins to lose its grip on it.

Part four. Magnetic Buoyancy.

This “Magnetic Buoyancy” effect was first discovered way back in 1945 when the first atomic bomb called Trinity was exploded in Alamogordo New Mexico USA. Dr. Glasston in his book on “The Effects of Nuclear Weapons” talks about it in some detail. However after 1962 all info on the Magnetic Buoyancy effect has been reclassified and removed from public view until now.

Basically the principle is simple. If you expand the radiated E/M field of an object by heating, it’s density decreases. When the expanded E/M field becomes large enough, the object will then be levitated by the earths own magnetic field lines, inducing magnetic buoyancy.

Its that simple. Einstein just didn’t think about it or maybe he “simply” skipped class the day it was taught or maybe he just had the wrong security clearance. So much for history.

Part five. The process.

The process is very simple. If you create a large enough electron space charge around an object that is in a vacuum state it will increase its E/M radius and reduces the force of gravity on it. However this “space charge” requires an electron disconnect (Debye shield)  from the surrounding air molecules in order to work properly. This is to prevent the space charge from being bleed off due to the presence of the surrounding  gas molecules in the air.

Therefore by charging up the outer walls of the containment vessel with the same polarity charge as the test object, you create a semi- Faraday shield that blocks the radiation losses. This is called an “electron disconnect ” with gravity and it is necessary for the test chamber to work properly. Once the test object has been properly disconnected from all external E/M fields, Magnetic Buoyancy takes over.

As they use to say in the that old TV commercial. Up up and away with TWA. Thank you Howard Hughes.

More

Alpha particles being relatively heavy and positively charged, tend to have a very short mean free path, and quickly lose there kinetic energy within a short distance of the source. This results in several MeV of ionizing radiation being deposited in a relatively small volume of material. The Ionizing ability of a particle is related to its penetrating ability. As its penetrating ability increases Ionizing ability decreases.

This means that several million electron volts are radiated within a few centimeters surrounding the Thorium source and are trapped there forming an electron disconnect or what is called a Debye lair/shield that blocks or pushes out the earths gravitational / magnetic lines of force producing what is called magnetic buoyancy per Dr. Glastones work on the subject matter in his 1962 edition of “The effects of Nuclear weapons” plasma fireball theory.

Heat shield tiles or space craft Hull Plating that produces very large amounts of Alpha radiation will slow down a space craft reentering the earths atmosphere.

Thorium is a likely substance to be added to heat shield tiles due to its ability to absorb and withstand extremely high temperatures and its ability to then throw off large amounts of Alpha particles that will then react with the earths natural magnetic field lines slowing down reentry speeds substantially. It came to be used on the Apollo heat shield to reduce reentry speeds in order to not shred the sub sonic velocity parachutes.

Foo Fightters - WWII

Foo Fighters – WWII

The technique use by DR. Walter Dornberger and the Germans during WW2 that was brought back to the US where it was experimented on by Larry Bell and NASA was to use vacuum tube fulfillment wire that was heavily coated with Thorium salts.

These were formed into wire mesh spheres that were packed with a flammable material that was soaked in oxygenated kerosine flue commonly called Hydrazine fuel.

When ignited the plasma ion density would rise to a level capable of pushing out the earths magnetic field lines and producing positive magnetic buoyancy. The intended purpose was to be used as aerial illumination flares for antiaircraft defense.

These were referred to as FOO Fighter by allied pilots flying night missions over Germany during WWII. The Phoenix lights of several years ago might be a revived experiment using this technology.

____________

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on January 28, 2016, With 8306 Reads Filed under WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

25 Responses to "VT Science: UFT, Apollo and Keshe"

  1. hardworx  February 1, 2016 at 11:52 am

    Parts 1 & 2 of the unified field theory section seem to borrowed verbatim from the book by Miles Mathis ‘The un-unified field’

    • Jim W. Dean, Managing Editor  February 2, 2016 at 7:32 pm

      In the publication layout work the book photos got mixed up among the large selection that we had. I have updated for Mr. Mathis.

    • LC  February 5, 2016 at 9:23 pm

      Hopefully the substance was NOT altered!!!

      ++ For latest on NASA hoaxes put stuff like this in Google IMAGES:::

      new apollo hoax

      Latest apollo hoax

      New Mars hoax

      One page which I hadn’t seen B-4 is this one of David Icke where a photography expert analyzes some of fake shots::::

      Copy-paste link in browser:::

      forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=76620

  2. LC  January 29, 2016 at 4:22 pm

    Dr. Keshe === a World Treasure & a New Tesla. But he is NOT M.I.T.

    Below clips give intro to Dr. Keshe physics & free-engergy which
    Dr. Preston James has been writing about Keshe free-engergy past couple years. Copy-paste each line

    YouTube:::
    Keshe plasma reactor for sale
    Keshe Flying Cars YouTube
    Keshe flying car – 08/08/2012

    IRANIAN SCIENTIST KESHE PLANS FREE ENERGY FLYING SAUCER EDITED EDITION

    KESHE FREE ENERGY 10/16/15 ANNOUNCEMENT!!! EDITED & W FIXED SOUND

    Above last video possibly his latest presentation

    • LC  January 29, 2016 at 4:27 pm

      Related page still on VT home page:::

      Are Challenger’s Crew Members Alive? By Stewart Ogilby on July 7, 2015

      Or link:::
      veteranstoday.com/2015/07/07/363471/

    • LC  January 30, 2016 at 7:45 pm

      DR. Keshe::: You are NOT dealing with HUMANS:::

      DR. Keshe + His inventions disclosed 4-FREE to world to bring world peace + world healing + world feeding++ must be reason for RKM ZIO-TERRORISTS targeting Iran past decade+::::

      Dr. Keshe free energy machine eliminates fuel use: for transport + manufacturing + heating. So it eliminates $100+ trillion annual markets for these commodities all in control of Rothschild Khazarian Mafia (RKM).

      Dr. Keshe carbon collection + use of the liquid carbon to generate free food is another $100+ trillion market!!!!

      Dr. Keshe healing pen & other health creating systems & against all illnesses eliminate $30+ trillion market!!!!!

      Dr. Keshe & Iran nuclear scientists have been working on these PEACEFUL TECHNOLOGIES past decades & the RKM ZIO-Terrorism against them + assassinations of Iran scientists were all to prevent Dr. Keshe + Iran from unleashing all this priceless tech+++ much more which could shut down RKM monopolies + world control!!!!

      Dr. Keshe + Iran do NOT know that they are NOT dealing with humans but Shapeshifting Reptilian Cannibals-In-Control (CIC) who want NO peace. In fact they’ve done everything past few centuries to prevent peace around the world by creating genocidal wars+ famines++

      So::: If Iran has these flying saucer ++ Tesla type hi-techs they should now use’m to wipe out ISIS + ZIO-TERRORISM in occupied Palestine.

    • LC  January 30, 2016 at 7:46 pm

      RKM runs US + USG + US Prestitude & Fraducasting services.
      USG + states + local governments are all cesspools which could either be cleaned with a violent revolution or by the non-violent revolution of boycotting to vote for anything & anyone so they’re dumped within next few years.
      We are NOT dealing with humans folks. NOT HUMANS!!!!

  3. ksp  January 29, 2016 at 6:24 am

    From VT article: The True Story Behind “Interstellar” January 23, 2015

    ” They used one of Dornberger’s tricks from his V-2 days. They just pressurized the fuel tanks with Helium instead of using the usual nitrogen charging system. Helium being diamagnetic simply neutralized the gravitational effects of acceleration and vibration”.

    The properties of elements chart show both gases as diamagnetic.) Still curious how this good get past a proof read in a technical writing.

    • LC  January 29, 2016 at 4:23 pm

      I wonder why above page not linked here:::

      The True Story Behind “Interstellar” By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor on January 23, 2015

      or copy-paste link in browser::::

      veteranstoday.com/2015/01/23/the-true-story-behind-interstellar/

  4. Altimometer  January 28, 2016 at 3:59 pm

    Would a blind Newton describe gravity as a radius, Earth, in movement through the vacuum of space that is being a large E/M field so as not to collide with our neighbors being of the same?

  5. Laika von old Monkshusen  January 28, 2016 at 2:47 pm

    I’ve been watching/reading VT for almost a year now, and I’m pretty impressed by especially Gordie & Jim, and Barrett (they’re awesome, in many ways) & Alexis (although the latter could learn from Gearoid Ó Colmain, France), but also several others. As much as I like them I dislike the absurd writings; many totally unfounded, but firm statements, accusations and assertions of/by the South African lady. That doesn’t add up, in my humble opinion. Same goes also for articles like this (and some parts of P. James’ articles). And certainly don’t make firm statements about such things; you’d be no better than the Lügenpresse (just other themes) . . . NASA “astronauts” have obviously not been anywhere near the moon, let alone landed on it. I’d rather believe in a flying hag (on a broomstick). Give me any good reason to be certain, trustful . . . Besides, I’ve no respect ar all for “science”, academics, let alone “authorities”.

    • Aziz Khalfan  January 28, 2016 at 6:39 pm

      von old, I guess when Katherine Frisk wrote the article ‘The Nature Of Evil – Political Ponerology’ she may have had you in mind, just guessing.

    • LC  January 29, 2016 at 4:25 pm

      @ Laika:::

      Don’t you see in above photo LEM landed on very edge of MOON????

      Amazing it didn’t fall off!!!! Neil did it with his 5 cent BIC pen!!!!

    • LC  January 30, 2016 at 7:48 pm

      Apollo-LEM photo above::::

      This must be a new NASA release. I never seen it B-4.
      Lets do a short photo analysis:::

      Increase your display brightness.
      Right click on that photo & open it in new window.
      Enlarge image. Notice at least 2 flood lights one behind + above head-level of the guy taking the shot. floodlight hotspot above his head.
      Second floodlight to his right hitting LEM & the other guy. 2nd light creates its own shadows which are at angle with the guy on left.
      Black background must be deep space!!! Else you should see MOON-surface for miles. after all its supposed to be sunny there in this shot!!!! So:: NASA Moon was flat & this landing was on its edge!!!
      4th LEM leg NOT visible. Might already be hanging off the edge!!!
      See footprints under LEM??? YES!
      See rocket fire crater under LEM??? NO!! So:: it Must have used 100% anti-gravity folks. NO rocket fire!!!!
      Then why did they use rocket fire to lift off & who was left behind just to film lift offs???? In::

      YouTube:::
      Apollo 17 Lunar Liftoff

  6. Jeff Smith  January 28, 2016 at 1:49 pm

    Its called Archimedes Principal. You put a yard stick in a bath tub full of water so you can you can measure the gold content of the kings crown. That’s how you measure density with a yard stick.

    • Worker Bee  January 28, 2016 at 4:56 pm

      If you have a graduated cylinder, you can dispense with the yardstick. But the displacement of water is simply measuring volume – assuming what you put in the water is non-absorbent and lacks connected pores that trap air (look up the different specific gravities of aggregate) – while the weight of the crown is needed to calculate its specific gravity. And what is weight but the gravitational force between two masses? So we are back to the conventional definitions, unless I am missing something.

    • Gordon Keeble  January 30, 2016 at 12:34 am

      Eureka!

  7. truthman  January 28, 2016 at 1:38 pm

    I’m not saying’ that we never landed and subsequently blasted off from the moon. But, I am saying that contraption in the first photograph in this article DID NOT!

  8. Aziz Khalfan  January 28, 2016 at 10:07 am

    The author here has skilfully skirted the definition of gravity to merely describing it, albeit with pretty mathematical models !

    Main problem we face today is that the dimensional analysis used in science for physical and electrical phenomena are not in lock-step.

    Further the author fails to mention the important fact that whenever one of these 3 non-physical quantities, electric current – magnetic field – force (gravity), then the other 2 are always associated with it, and each of the 3 spiraling at a tangent to the whole triad.

    If one understands that light is a state of matter, in the sense that there is no light in the absence of matter, and conversely that light and matter are dual, each begets the other, then it stands to reason that we are dealing with different manifestations of energy here whether in the form of matter, force, magnetic field or electrical current.

    It is strange that the whole of physical science is predicated on the action of a non-physical ‘force/gravity’ on mass, where this force is known by many descriptions but no one yet has succeeded in defining it for what it is.

  9. Serenity  January 28, 2016 at 8:28 am

    Thanks Jeff Smith & VT for this enlightening article. Please…more of this high caliber reporting!

  10. Worker Bee  January 28, 2016 at 5:12 am

    “Density, like volume, can only be measured with a yardstick.”

    Where can I get one of these density yardsticks?

    Since density is defined as a derived quantity of ratio of mass to volume, it cannot be measured directly by conventional means, but can be estimated for liquids by refractive index, and for solids by EM attenuation or vibrational characteristics.

    Has Keshe or someone else invented a way to measure density directly?

    • Paul  January 28, 2016 at 8:17 am

      Yep, I was with it until that statement. I’m no physisst, but I’ve followed this area of science for many years. Mostly Bearden and Bedini. I know of no way that density can be measured directly. Especially as simply as putting a metaphorical yardstick up to it.

      I’d like an explanation of the singularity of a black hole using the concepts written in this article. That would be interesting.

    • Aziz Khalfan  January 28, 2016 at 4:14 pm

      Please do not be pedantic, all he meant was that to measure density you need a measure of linear length.
      Imagine if we were to re define density as:

      ‘The Mass contained in a sphere whose surface area is 1 square meter.’ The units of density then would be expressed as kilogram / square meter.

      Or to re define velocity as:
      ‘The time it takes to traverse 1 meter’ then the units of velocity would be expressed as time / meter.

      Apparently this is what some of the equivalent electrical quantities are defined.

    • Worker Bee  January 28, 2016 at 4:45 pm

      “There are probably no two objects in the universe which have the same mass, but all atoms of a common element (and isotope) have the same density. Therefore, density is a primary quantity, mass is derived.”

      Yes, but the density will depend on how many atoms of a given type in a given volume – spacing between atoms is of course not constant. Yes, if you could identify the numbers of each isotope in a given volume you would know the density (assuming an overall neutral charge), but it is rather beyond our capability to do that for anything but a very small amount of matter and at great expense.

    • Worker Bee  January 28, 2016 at 8:31 pm

      Strip the electrons off the nucleus (i.e. plasma) and the density of an atom changes. Or with high enough gravitational forces the atomic nuclei will compress, so to say that an atom always has the same density is just silly.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH