…by Jonas E. Alexis
General Vincent R. Stewart has some bad news. Really bad news. “The Russian reinforcement has changed the calculus completely,” he has recently lamented.[1]
Of course, the New World Order and its agents expect good results. They have spent multiplied millions of dollars in Syria mobilizing terrorist cells, making pacts with al-Qaeda and ISIS, and telling lies about their covert operations. They expect to see Assad forces surrendering to the powers that be.
But NWO agents are seeing the opposite. The sad part is that their own generals keep reporting those bad news. That again is a complete humiliation. The Daily Beast has recently piled up another bad news: “Pentagon Wants a Plane Packed With Hundreds of Missiles to Beat Putin’s Air Force.”[2]
Whatever you may think of Putin, you have to give the man at least some credit for telling the New World Order that Syria is not going to be like Iraq.
Some people have accused me of being pro-Russian, when in fact I am pro-reason. If Russia happens to be on the side of reason, then you can be sure that I will applaud Russia.
There is no question that Russia’s position on Syria is sound. If we go back to 2014, we would discover that Russia mapped out its position succinctly: New World Order agents cannot continue to destroy whatever country they do not like.
“The world is full of contradictions today,” Putin said then. “We need to be frank in asking each other if we have a reliable safety net in place…What we needed to do was to carry out a rational reconstruction and adapt it the new realities in the system of international relations.”
This rational reconstruction hinges on consistency in international politics. “But the United States, having declared itself the winner of the Cold War, saw no need for this. Instead of establishing a new balance of power, essential for maintaining order and stability, they took steps that threw the system into sharp and deep imbalance.”
Here Putin also had Iraq, Syria and Libya in mind: “First there was the military operation in Iraq, then in Libya, which got pushed to the brink of falling apart. Why was Libya pushed into this situation? Today it is a country in danger of breaking apart and has become a training ground for terrorists.”
If that is not a reasonable statement, then it is good enough. The historical record has shown us that Iraq is a mess. Afghanistan is a mess. Libya is a mess. And now the New world Order wants to do the same thing in Syria.
Now NWO agents have a new stupid idea in town: “If Assad wins, Islamic State wins.”[3] Assad is fighting the Islamic State, but if he wins, the Islamic State wins? One needn’t be an intellectual to see that this is really dumb.
People are free to say that Putin is a bad guy without evidence. They are free to accuse him of being a terrorist without presenting rigorous documentation, but if they keep making one accusation after another without serious scholarship, then they have no part in the moral and intellectual discussion. And people of reason have no obligation to pay the slightest attention to their perversion. The West was built on reason, not on assertions built upon other assertions which have no substance and logical coherency.
Western culture—and the serious intellectuals and thinkers who are its true successors—needs to return to its foundational principles of logic and evidence. Character assassination, name calling, or claims of anti-Semitism or racism are not acceptable means of destroying ideas. An idea has to stand on its merits—whether it is truthful, factual, and accurate—as proven by an examination of available data and rational inquiry.
A statement or theory or hypothesis must also be judged against rational historical evidence. If a person claims that a certain event happened in history, then he should not be upset if he is asked to provide evidence for the claim. If he cannot, or if the historical data fail to corroborate his claim, then people are justified in rejecting the claim.
This is plain and simple, and does not require any academic expertise. In fact, this has been one of the pillars of the western intellectual and historical tradition. From Plato to Kant and beyond, we see ideas discussed freely and examined within context.
Lastly, the Western mind was not born out of the useless idea that the suppression of the truth will lead to democracy and freedom. If we take Augustine as one of our models, then we should quickly learn that morality and practical reason are two of the most important tools we need in the political landscape.
The New World Order metaphysically and practically rejects both. Putin seems to embrace to both. I have no choice but to applaud Putin—at least for resisting the New World Order and its diabolical ideology in much of the West. I you have something else with serious evidence, I would be more than happy to entertain it. If you have nothing but just a dubious assertion, then you need to shut up.
[1] Greg Miller, “U.S. officials: Russian airstrikes have changed ‘calculus completely’ in Syria,” Washington Post, February 9, 2016.
[2] David Axe, “Pentagon Wants a Plane Packed With Hundreds of Missiles to Beat Putin’s Air Force,” Daily Beast, February 10, 2016.
[3] Noah Feldman, “If Assad Wins, Islamic State Wins,” Bloomberg, February 10, 2016.
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the book, Kevin MacDonald’s Metaphysical Failure: A Philosophical, Historical, and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and Identity Politics. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.
ATTENTION READERS
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.
About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Comments are closed.