Jonas E. Alexis graduated from Avon Park High School, studied mathematics and philosophy as an undergraduate at Palm Beach Atlantic University, and has a master's degree in education from Grand Canyon University.

Some of his main interests include the history of Christianity, U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book ,Christianity & Rabbinic Judaism: A History of Conflict Between Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism from the first Century to the Twenty-first Century.

He is currently teaching mathematics in South Korea. He plays soccer and basketball in his spare time. He is also a cyclist. He is currently writing a book tentatively titled Zionism and the West.

Alexis welcomes comments, letters, and queries in order to advance, explain, and expound rational and logical discussion on issues such as the Israel/Palestine conflict, the history of Christianity, and the history of ideas.

In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, Alexis asks that all queries be appropriately respectful and maintain a level of civility. As the saying goes, “iron sharpens iron,” and the best way to sharpen one’s mind is through constructive criticism, good and bad.

However, Alexis has no patience with name-calling and ad hominem attack. He has deliberately ignored many queries and irrational individuals in the past for this specific reason—and he will continue to abide by this policy.


View Latest Posts >>>

The Neo-Bolsheviks and Zionist Media Make Donald Trump Look Like a Scholar

The Neocons want to drink the blood of Hillary Clinton because she allegedly shared confidential information. But zombie enabler David Petraeus is too big to go to jail, even though he got caught sharing confidential information with his prostitute.

People who ought to be behind bars for the rest of their natural lives.

People who ought to be behind bars for the rest of their natural lives.

…by Jonas E. Alexis

If you were trained in logic, then you know that an argument basically has to have a series of statements known as premises which inevitably will lead to a particular conclusion. Moreover, an argument can be either good or bad.

A good argument must consistently follow the rules of logic and has to have explanatory power and scope. As a corollary, any argument against a good argument will be based on premises that are less obvious than the good argument itself.

We should add that a bad argument violates or excludes some or all the rules of logic and substitutes irrational (and sometimes crazy) premises. This is simple enough to understand, but the Neo-Bolsheviks and New World Order agents want to tell us something different.

I was just watching the Zionist media the other day and was just appalled at how NWO agents come up with really crazy ideas and force them upon much of decent Americans who are trying to pick a presidential candidate. This is worth watching:

If you listen to Jewish journalist Jake Tapper closely, you should realize that he was insisting that Donald Trump categorically and forthrightly condemn a man whom he has never met and has never known! He was insisting that Trump condemn groups which support him as well. How does that logic work? And where is that in the Constitution? Is that really freedom? And if it isn’t, where did America get this mumbo jumbo?

Obviously America got it from the Anti-Defamation League,[1] a Jewish group which constantly plays double standard in the political firmament and which perpetually places draconian speech codes upon much of the West, most specifically America.

Tapper is probably an innocent man, but he is playing by the diabolical rule which has been forced upon him and much of the media. After all, he’s got bills to pay. He has a family, and he is probably trying to be a decent husband and father. But he is certainly doing the Zionist media a disservice if he cannot meet Trump on his own ground.

Yes, we know that Trump is not completely rational. Granted, he has said contradictory statements. But here Tapper is the irrational person and Trump obviously knocks him out. If we take leaders of the Anti-Defamation League to their logical conclusions, Trump needs to disavow anyone that they do not like!

This is really frustrating because those people ought to know better. I particularly am appalled when I read or listen to the stuff that Zionist shills put out there. It will not take you two seconds to realize that some people are really unsophisticated in their thinking. Even though many of them went to some of the best colleges in America, it seems that they have never been exposed to rigorous argumentation or sophisticated treatise on these matters. They spent a fortune to get a decent education, but somehow they got ideology instead.

I usually sit down and anticipate what a good objection could be to my arguments, what one might respond and answer them. But sometimes I realize that it is almost impossible to anticipate to some of the most ridiculous statements people put out there.

What is even more astonishing is that some of those people really think that they are articulating knocked-down arguments! In response to one of my articles last year, an individual said that “logic and reason prove nothing” and wrote an entire paragraph pretentiously using “logic and reason” to prove the thesis that “logic and reason prove nothing.” I responded by saying:

“In order to say that ‘logic and reason prove nothing,’ one obviously has to use logic and reason–an impressively and fantastically incoherent argument. In fact, if ‘logic and reason prove nothing,’ why should we listen to [Mr. X] here? Is he telling us to ignore his point? If this is so, then he shall have his wish.”

If you observe the Zionist media long enough, you will find similar argumentation. Sometimes I ask myself, “What would Plato or Kant or Hegel think about these people?” Remember when people were saying that there was no right or wrong in music? Remember how Plato responded?

“Through foolishness they deceived themselves into thinking that there was no right or wrong in music—that it was to be judged good or bad by the pleasure it gave. By their work and their theories they infected the masses with the presumption to think themselves adequate judges. … As it was, the criterion was not music, but a reputation for promiscuous cleverness and a spirit of law-breaking.”[2]


Then there is more to the Donald Trump controversy. The entire Zionist media wants him to reveal his income tax return, which is fair. But I had to laugh a bit here. The National Football League, which cashes in billions upon billions of dollars every single year,[3] has been tax-exempt since 1942![4]

A number of big companies have also failed to pay their taxes since 2014 and beyond. Companies like General Motors, Boston Properties, Public Storage, among seventeen others, are laughing all the way to the bank. Other companies such as General Electric and Verizon Communications have very low tax bills. Now get this from CNN and the Times of Israel: Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, the “world’s richest Jew,”[5] “never has to pay taxes again”![6]

No one has said a damn thing about any of this. But everyone wants to see Trump’s income taxes!

I am in no way defending Donald Trump here at all. In fact, we have criticized his views in several articles in the past. If he doesn’t pay taxes, shame on him and people ought to think twice about what he is saying in public. In fact, Trump seems to be playing games. The Times of Israel has recently reported:

“Speaking to the Sheldon Adelson-controlled Israel Hayom newspaper, Trump cited his daughter’s marriage to Jared Kushner, who is Jewish. And he added that he, himself, had participated in various pro-Israel rallies…

“Trump told the paper, which is strongly supportive of Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that he wanted to work to achieve Israeli-Palestinian peace… He also blasted the Iran nuclear deal, as he has in the past, calling it the worst possible accord for Israel.

“Asked for his position on moving the American Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem — as was promised in the past by many presidential candidates — Trump said he liked the idea.”[7]

Donald Trump, as with any other presidential candidate, cannot fully be trusted. But I am looking for consistency here. Will the media go after their idols such as the NFL and other big wheelers for not paying taxes? Will they revolt against both Socialism/Communism and Capitalism? If they will not, then how do they expect us to take them seriously? Should we take Bill Kristol seriously when he compares Trump to Hitler?

It is basically the same thing with the so-called Hillary Clinton allegations. The Neocons want to drink the blood of that woman because she allegedly shared confidential information. But zombie enabler David Petraeus is too big to go to jail.[8] George W. Bush is too important to be placed behind bars.

If that is not stupidity, what is?

I think the American people are rising up against Zionist stupidity, the New World Order, and the Neo-Bolshevik ideology. The Zionist establishment is sensing this as well.[9] The Emergency Committee for Israel released a propaganda video a few days ago, but the same video seems to be strengthening Trump’s campaign precisely because reasonable people agree with pretty much everything Trump said in the video:

Perhaps Trump should send the Emergency Committee for Israel a thank you note?


[1] “After Donald Trump wavers on David Duke, ADL publishes candidates’ guide to racists,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency, February 29, 2016.

[2] For a study on this, see David Tame, The Secret Power of Music: The Transformation of Self and Society Through Musical Energy (New York: Destiny Books, 1984).

[3] “NFL revenue: Here comes another record season,” CNN, September 10, 2015.

[4] “National Football League gives up decades-old tax-exempt status as commissioner says it was a ‘distraction,’” Daily Mail, April 28, 2015.

[5] “Facebook’s Zuckerberg is world’s richest Jew,” Times of Israel, March 3, 2016.

[6] Edward J. McCaffery, “Zuck never has to pay taxes again,” CNN, April 9, 2013.

[7] “Trump to Israeli paper: I’m your biggest friend,” Times of Israel, February 26, 2016.

[8] Kelley Vlahos, “David Petraeus’s Double Standard,” American Conservative, January 22, 2015.

[9] Nathan Guttman, “GOP Jews Cannot Unite Against Donald Trump — Despite ‘Neutral’ on Israel Declaration,” Jewish Daily Forward, March 1, 2016.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

brightoncollege
Posted by on March 4, 2016, With 4443 Reads Filed under Life, Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

6 Responses to "The Neo-Bolsheviks and Zionist Media Make Donald Trump Look Like a Scholar"

  1. Worker Bee  March 4, 2016 at 7:47 pm

    “If we take leaders of the Anti-Defamation League to their logical conclusions, Trump needs to disavow anyone that they do not like!”

    Remember Atzmon’s definition of “antisemite” – a person organized Jewry does not like.

  2. Amelius  March 4, 2016 at 11:31 am

    Times of Israel: “Mark Zuckerberg, the “world’s richest Jew,”

    Zuckerberg might be the richest ‘made for public consumption’ Jew, but I’m sure his fortune/material success would be considered cute by families like the Red Shield.

  3. RussG1  March 4, 2016 at 10:51 am

    This world would be a much better and more peaceful place without the PNAC/FPI mob.

  4. Beydety  March 4, 2016 at 6:57 am

    I see you support that POS war hawk Clinton, who’s no different from the arse wipes from the GOP that hate trump. None of you here at VT have said anything against, in fact the arse licking support you give makes me sick. She’s very bad news that one, not only for you Americans but the entire world.

    • Jonas E. Alexis  March 4, 2016 at 7:17 am

      Beydety,

      How did you arrive at the conclusion that I “support war hawk Clinton”? Please, read the article carefully. What I am saying is that double standard can never work in the political landscape. Every politician must abide by the moral law and practical reason. You can’t condemn Clinton for treason while Petraeus and Bush and Cheney and Rice and others are getting away with treason. That’s a contradiction. The Neoconservatives don’t make sense precisely because they abide by a diabolical system which is filled with contradictions.

    • Dan  March 4, 2016 at 2:06 pm

      Beydety, check out the Bern’s bio, too. He and his cronies under FBI surveillance for communist espionage at their coffee shop hangout in VT; his early hardline Stalinist affiliations; displaying the commie USSR flag in his office as mayor; his “journalism” consisting of depraved sexual fantasies at $50 a pop for smut mags; appearing with Frances Fox Piven; recent hugs and kisses intro in LA by Sarah Silverman, who’s on YouTube bragging about the Jews killing Christ and that she’d do it again in a minute if she could; etc. Point is, keep an eye on who’s backing this neo-Bolshevik over even Hillary.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH