Katherine is a freelance writer, political commentator, activist and the author of Jesus Was A Palestinian

View Latest Posts >>>

Reverse Speech: What people are really thinking

The Pope Versus Trump-Who is the real Christian?

pope-trump

by Katherine Frisk

Recently the Pope and Donald Trump had an altercation because the Pope accused Trump of not being a “Christian” because Trump wants to put up a security wall along the Mexican border and evict illegal immigrants. 

As I have stated in a previous article, my view on this issue is that any country, no matter what their religion may or may not be, that is in trillions of debt, that has a high unemployment rate and people who are homeless, needs to take care of their own and stabilize their own economies first before letting yet more people into the country, who instead of being job creators are job seekers and often rely on social security checks in order to survive.

While thousands of Americans are unemployed and struggling to survive, thousands from South America have entered the country and joined the illegal job market.

Let’s face it, the US economy is not what it once was and the middle class is depleting by the day. Small business development has been gobbled up by monopolies and students deep in debt with high qualifications end up working in the service industry with every penny that  they earn going towards many years of repayment schemes. Thousands more arriving across the border is not going to solve this problem.

This then is the crux of the disagreement between the Pope and Trump with the added accusation of Trump not being “Christian” enough.

Reverse_Speech_P1010016-300x224

Reverse speech has been around for many years and has an uncanny way of exposing what people really think, who they really are and if what they say is the same as what they are thinking.

Often what comes out in forward speech is in direct contrast to their real intentions and motivations. Which can be an eye opener for many who believe the spin only to discover that the reality is far from what they were led to believe.

David John Oats is a reverse speech specialist who has been around for years. His work throughout the years has proved to be uncannily accurate especially with regard to the US Presidential elections.  He often reveals the type of candidate that you are really voting for as opposed to the candidate that you think you are getting. The blurb from his web site is as follows:

It first began for him on his 28th birthday in 1983 when he accidentally dropped a tape player in a toilet bowl and as a result it only played backwards. He started listening to tapes backwards and by 1987 he had written his first book on reverse speech, co authored with his mate, Greg Albrecht.

Since that time David has written 4 more books on Reverse Speech and designed and authored the 3 Reverse Speech training courses. He has lectured around the world to crowds of 1000’s and has conducted 1000’s of media interviews, including CNN’s the Larry King show.

David_John_Oats_102-200x300Jeff Rense recently did an interview with David who has done reverse speech analysis on Pope Francis and Donald Trump.

If anything can clear up who is a “Christian” between these two is and who is not, reverse speech has the answers. An apt interview if ever there was one taking the recent controversy between these two gentleman into account.

Here is the Interview. However, listen to it at your own discretion, the revelations are shocking and this should certainly not be shared with anyone under the age of 18.

The reverse speech of both separates the wheat from the chaff and clearly exposes who is a “Christian” and who is not. Whether you believe it or not, David’s track record over the years is a good testimony as to his accuracy.

 

Click HERE to listen.

 


Katherine Frisk is a freelance writer, political commentator and the author of: Jesus Was A Palestinian.


 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on March 11, 2016, With 6265 Reads Filed under Investigations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

27 Responses to "Reverse Speech: What people are really thinking"

  1. wjabbe  March 12, 2016 at 4:40 pm

    Trump should have his team research the uniform worn by General George S. Patton the day he was murdered in Germany after WWII and make a dozen or so copies up for Trump to wear along with the two pearl handled pistols at his sides. He could also have all his security detail wear fatigues like the alleged father of Sandy Hook child David Wheeler had on as he marched carrying rifles at Sandy Hook School with the cameras running the day of the event. His staff could carry the rifles like he carried that day. Trump could wear a cap with five stars sort of like the ad for the insurance company, but make it clear he was not trying to imitate Patton, only in spirit though. He could use cap pistols and just make noise with them to quiet the crowd. He could even arrive in a 1938 Cadillac Limo painted Olive Drab like Patton used that day when he went bird hunting with another general but was murdered by a member of our military as documented in the book “Target Patton” by Robert Wilcox. This would get Trump much much attention. He would look better than with those ugly suits and ties. Trump could also wear the same gloves Patton wore and imitate slapping all the political cowards in DC like Patton slapped the cowards in the hospital. For example he could have someone, even a man, or trans, imitate Hillary while he fictitiously slapped her in the face. Ditto with the others and also coward Bill. Imagine the commotion this would cause in the media.

  2. Alexchubb8  March 12, 2016 at 10:42 am

    There are so many people we need to do this on like oh i donno maybe start with Scalia and then move onto myself who knows.

    Does David John Oates sell his work? I would pay for his recordings and I would also pay for a service.

    • Katherine Frisk  March 12, 2016 at 10:13 pm

      Go to his web site. He does personal readings.

  3. Pink Rabbit  March 12, 2016 at 10:02 am

    God will punish those who knowingly submit to the will of Satan and do not repent. (Using His holy Word to do the work of Satan will not go unnoticed, I would suspect but cannot judge with certainty). We must pray that more of us seek the true light of our Lord and not be beguiled by Lucifer, the morning star who quotes scripture.

  4. SweetLove  March 12, 2016 at 9:50 am

    Fascinating, thank you.

  5. Lee01  March 12, 2016 at 7:08 am

    Also, I get that a major theme of this site is support for the Palestinian’s claim to the Zionist occupied land. I agree the Khazars do not belong there. I disagree with most of what I see here that attempts to justify why. Take the falsehood that “Jesus was a Palestinian”. “Palestinian” is a contemporary description of a mixed race people who inhabit the same geographical area that Israelties once did. Claiming Jesus was one of them is on par with those who argue blacks built the pyramids because both blacks and the pyramids are in Africa.

    Jesus was racially a pure blooded Israelite of the tribe of Judah. He was born in Bethlehem but raised in Nazareth, making him a Galilean by citizenship. He was not mixed race. This is proven a multitude of ways. The clincher being Deu 23:2, which forbids a mixed race person from even entering the congregation of God. If your theology holds that Jesus was mixed, you have a problem because by His very presence He is breaking Gods’ law, thereby sinning, and cannot be your sinless sacrifice. Jesus was not mixed. The racial descendants of the Israelites have long since left the holy land. It is now populated by Khazars and mixed race Arabs. The Arabs have Abrahamic blood through Ishmael and even some Israelite blood through race mixing. However, they are not Israelites. To say they are is like saying Obama is Anglo because his mother was white.

    • Katherine Frisk  March 12, 2016 at 7:54 am

      “Jesus was racially a pure blooded Israelite “I presume you mean white. This a a lie perpetuated by the white European Khazar Jews who are not Semitic in order to justify their subjugation of Semitic Palestinians who are Torah Jews, Samaritans, Christians and Muslims. With regards to the Bible, Moses Married a Cushite, (black) the most famous love song in the Bible is about a Black Shalumite, the Song of Songs, Tamar was a Canaanite, Ruth a Moabite and Batsheba a Hittite. So much for “Judaic”purity.

    • Katherine Frisk  March 12, 2016 at 7:59 am

      And if you are going to start quoting Noah and how he cursed Ham I suggest you read your Bible. He did not curse Ham he cursed Canaan who was the father of the Canaanites who were Semites. Tamar who married Judah and gave him two sons was a Canaanite… so now where does that leave your pure blooded Israelite tribe of Judah when you include Ruth the Moabite (Arab) and Batsheba the Hittite?

    • Katherine Frisk  March 12, 2016 at 8:32 am

      With regard to Bethlehem, archeology uncovers the truth and exposes the lies. The same way that there is no evidence of the so called first Temple ever having being built in Jerusalem in spite of much digging. Only the second which resembled a Babylonian Temple where only the wall now remains. Bethlehem in the first century A.D. was unoccupied. However Bethlehem a few miles from Nazareth was a thriving town. All indications point to Jesus being born in the north, what was the Northern Kingdom of Israel, not the southern kingdom of Judea. And yes, the Nubian Egyptians (Black) did build the Pyramids. If you go to the Egyptian museum in Cairo, and look at the mummies, you will see that they are mostly Nubian. Egyptians were black until the Hyksos invasion, long after the Pyramids were built, when they became mixed blood. Today Egyptians are black, Arab, Semitie, Greek, Roman, French, Spanish, in fact represent all race groups from the Middle East and the Medditteranean countries.

  6. Katherine Frisk  March 12, 2016 at 6:52 am

    Oh my goodness, so is Hips a Jew sitting in a bunker in Tel Aviv? If that is the case, then he is as bad as the Pope. Same game plan. Reverse psychology. Or reverse speech as the case may be.

  7. Lee01  March 12, 2016 at 6:43 am

    “If anything can clear up who is a “Christian” between these two is and who is not. . .”

    . . . it’s the Bible. To begin, Catholics are not Christian. The Catholic religion is the largest cult, in the purest definition of the word, that has ever existed. Neither the pope or Trump are Christians for a multitude of reasons. In a case by case basis as to whether or not someone’s actions are consistent with Christian morality, one not need be a Christian to exhibit such on occasion. The issue that started the Trump vs. pope situation is the issue of segregation. Contemporary people who claim to have faith in Yeshua (Jesus), or propose to judge who is and is not Christian based on moral issues, would do well to study their Bible. The God of the Bible commands racial segregation. As in, it’s not merely good advice, it’s a command. Man’s conditioned, modern knee jerk to that is racial segregation is “bad” and “evil”. If you fall into that camp seek Gods’ wisdom and discard man’s on the subject: Exodus 23:33, 2 Cor 6:17-18, Num 30:50-56, Jos 23:11-13, to name a few. The entire books of Ezra and Nehemiah carry racial segregation as major themes of returning to Gods’ way. There are no exceptions made converts as is commonly argued in error today:

    “Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude…. Thus [were they] cleansed … from all strangers….” (Nehemiah 13:3-30)

    • Katherine Frisk  March 12, 2016 at 7:19 am

      I agree with “are consistent with Christian morality, one not need be a Christian to exhibit such on occasion. ” As for Ezra and Nehemiah I don’t agree, neither did Jesus. He associated with everyone. In the case of America we are not talking racial segregation, we are talking one economy that is failing being invaded by people from other countries who also have failing economies. When the USA as I have suggested before, can take care of its own people first, then they can consider opening the doors. As it stands this is not the case. And Americans are being side lined in their own Nation. Americans being Native American, white, black and Asian . The US is a multi cultural society and has been since the British landed at Jamestown. Pokahantas married a white British male and they had a child. This was on going through the 17th, 18th, 19th 20th and 21st centuries.

    • Katherine Frisk  March 12, 2016 at 7:25 am

      The number of Americans who are actually both Native American and white goes largely unreported. Americans are made to feel ashamed of their Native American ancestry. There are many. Cher is but one example. Then there are a number of Americans who are black and white. Also largely unreported. Then there are a number of Americans who are Asian and white. Black and Native American. Asian and black. Asian and Native America. It is a gross misconception to categorize anyone in the USA as white because they have a light coloured skin. Or happen to have inherited blond hair and blue eyes when in fact their genetic structure is predominately Native American.

    • Katherine Frisk  March 12, 2016 at 7:39 am

      In South Africa this is similar to the “white Afrikaans” 65% of whom are actually coloured and mixed blood. When slavery was abolished in the Cape in 1830 the Dutch left the Cape on the Great Trek, not only to get away from the now British governed colony, but so that they would not have to set their slaves free. In the Great Trek the white Boer was outnumbered by their mixed blood slaves by 2 to 1 sometimes 3-1, who were black, Khoi and Malaysian. Between 1830 and when Apartheid became law there was a lot of interbreeding. Hence during Apartheid before genetic testing, they had the “comb test,” to separate the more white Afrikaner from the more black Afrikaner. If the comb got stuck in their hair they were labeled coloured. If it did not they were labeled white. A lot of families were split up in the process, some suffering from land evictions while others had the privilage of being white. To this day some of the most racist people are in fact coloured passing themselves off as white and hating the blacks. They often have olive skin, bright blue or green eyes and curly hair to varying degrees.

  8. MoT  March 12, 2016 at 6:42 am

    Honestly, Katherine, it’s as tiresome to us as it is to you. You can’t publish anything without having DH from some bunker in Tel Aviv muddying the conversation. This alone goes to prove who they really are.

  9. CRM114  March 12, 2016 at 6:02 am

    Good piece, Katherine. Rense’s characterization of the pope as “New World Order Shill” is appropriate. I recently commented on one of Michael Farrell’s pieces on what was for me a chilling moment in the debate before the SC primary when, in discussing health care, Cruz hammered Trump on Trump’s stated refusal to allow people to “die in the streets”. Rubio joined this psychopathic display, with Trump repeatedly indicating he would provide a safety net to prevent people from dying on the streets and sidewalks of America and the two senators attacking him for an apparent support of “socialized medicine”. I found it odd no MSM commentators picked up on the, at best, cold hearted display from Cruz and Rubio, and that the Church didn’t speak up on behalf of Trump’s stance. Now we have Rubio and Cruz calling Trump “anti-Israeli” for simply the suggestion by Trump he would be “fair” in peace negotiations between the Palestinians and Israeli’s. Again no comment from Church leaders. Just a few examples of the full court NWO press against Trump. In light of this, fascinating piece with the pope’s speech analysis.

    • Katherine Frisk  March 12, 2016 at 6:43 am

      So they are prepared to let Americans die in the streets and still import more Roman Catholics from South America? Basically. Just proves how insane these people are, give the Pope half a chance and he will be burning anyone and everyone at the stake (or in ovens) who does not go to Roman Catholic confession, (not that they need it anymore with the NSA/Google/TV cameras etc) or Mass on Sunday where they eat flesh and drink blood in a cannibalistic rite in front of a tortured human being nailed to some wood. Try finding Jesus in his most famous Sermon on the Mount or sharing the fishes and the loaves in 12 baskets amongst the 5,000 in any of these churches! Only blood, guts, gore, guilt and fear. As for Trump’s stand on Israel and Palestine with the West Bank illegal occupation and the Gaza Strip being a humanitarian disaster, to say nothing about Israel bombing children in their sleep who had gone to find safety in a United Nations building, he sounds like Rabin who was assassinated which means he is on the right page. As I recall David mentions Rabin in this interview, though that might have been part three. His forward speech like Trumps did not contradict his reverse speech. Rabin was against illegal occupation on the West bank and Gaza Strip.

  10. caspervanmartin  March 12, 2016 at 2:34 am

    Want a real eye opener and mind bender? Reverse speech these two jekylls Oats and Rense…listen for “endorse Trump.

  11. Katherine Frisk  March 12, 2016 at 12:01 am

    How much do you get paid to trail my articles and scream Jew! every chance you get? I have written a lot and incorporated all religions in all crimes and corruption Hips. You just fail to acknowledge that.

  12. davor  March 11, 2016 at 6:10 pm

    Really that was kind of horror coming from the Pope. Pope obviously has advisors that are working similar stuff like the cold war era Reagan’s administration, we have seen USA approaching Cuba and Russia (Orthodox church) all through Vatican. However, thorough and self-critical Catholics should not be fooled that any of their representatives or senators is a Christian or even yet a good Christian if he is to provide them with jobs over middle east dead corpses. Probably if you pour couple of million of gallons of Holy water over Capitol or White House you still wouldn’t find a real Christian there. People that try to justify murder for jobs and prosperity cannot be Christian even if they sleep in a sleeping bag with candles under the altar. Therefore if someone like Bush or Obama says they are Christian it is so easily verifiable by their achievements. But it is sad to see papacy thrown around for political ground. His speech in the Senate was however much more Christian than this one. Is Joe Biden Catholic Christian? Is Netanyahu Jewish? They all say they are, however if you crosscheck Torah and Bible values with their contemporary deeds you will find there is no similarities whatsoever. They just borrow religious ethics for their economic goals.

  13. kenny173  March 11, 2016 at 6:00 pm

    When the white Beatles album came out late 60s we copied it on a real to reel then played the album backwards. Reverse speech , singing take your pick it worked such as “number nine, number nine…and “Paul is dead miss him miss him”. Etc etc. We all agreed that it was a publicity stunt in the hopes of selling more albums…even tho it was a new excitement what did we gain from listening to the album in reverse? Another hit on a Mexican joint, that’s about it.

  14. Preston James, Ph.D  March 11, 2016 at 3:49 pm

    A truly great expose here. I look forward to every single article by Katherine Frisk, a great breath of fresh air and one hard-hitting investigative journalist that has courage to deal with any difficult subject and strip it down to the core issues. Please keep this fine work coming.

    • Katherine Frisk  March 11, 2016 at 11:03 pm

      Thanks Preston. Support much appreciated

  15. JS  March 11, 2016 at 3:01 pm

    Pope Francis is NOT named after St. Francis of Assisi, the founder of the Franciscans. He is named after St. Francis Xavier, S.J., the co-founder of the Society of Jesus (Jesuits).

  16. Agin  March 11, 2016 at 2:15 pm

    The Hidden Hand That Shaped History. (Napoleon, Stalin, Lenin, Marx etc.)

    See also (photos) Pope Francis Hidden Hand and Ted Cruz Hidden Hand as well as Figurism.

  17. Charlotte NC Bill  March 11, 2016 at 2:07 pm

    Then Jesus was ” sexist” because He chose 12 men to be his Apostles. The first priests of His Church with St. Peter as the Head. The genders have different, but equally important, roles. Holy nuns are very important. Of course, the people who DON’T respect them are the feminists who think that being an immodest slut means strength and dignity. The problem is the church has been infiltrated by Judeo-Masonry.That’s the problem; the Pope is more Masonic than Trump…Trump is more Scottish Rite and the Pope is more Grand Orient..

    • Katherine Frisk  March 12, 2016 at 12:10 am

      Charlotte a) Peter was not the first head of the early Christian Church. James the Righteous was the first Bishop and remained so long after Peter had died. b) Peter is the only person in the Bible who is called Satan, by Jesus. c) Mary Magdalene far from being the whore she has been smeared with, was a disciple and an Apostle. d) The Vatican has always been run by the Black Nobility, specifically the Italian Mafia. According to your logic these people are therefore all Jews from the P2 lodge. A Masonic Roman Catholic Order.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH