Ian Greenhalgh is a photographer and historian with a particular interest in military history and the real causes of conflicts.

His studies in history and background in the media industry have given him a keen insight into the use of mass media as a creator of conflict in the modern world.

His favored areas of study include state sponsored terrorism, media manufactured reality and the role of intelligence services in manipulation of populations and the perception of events.


View Latest Posts >>>

Islamic Culture before Western meddling

A great flowering of culture and civilisation in the Middle East

Suleiman Mosque - Istanbul

Suleiman Mosque – Istanbul

by Ian Greenhalgh

Early London

Early London

When the great capitals of Europe – London, Paris Berlin etc were little more than small towns with open sewers, strewn with filth and ordure and riddled with disease the Islamic world was home to a flowering of culture that created spectacular planned cities with great irrigation and sewerage systems, miles of street lighting and all the amenities of a flourishing urban society.

Decades of demonisation of Arabs and Islamic people in general has meant that the Western world has remained largely ignorant of the achievements of Islamic culture – how many realise that the system of numbers we use today is Arabic or that the foundation of many modern sciences such as astronomy is to be found not in the West, but in the Islamic world.

When we invaded the Middle East in the Crusades, we were the savage barbarians attacking a more highly cultured and civilised people; the Islamic peoples rightfully saw we Europeans as dirty, smelly unwashed killers who had little regard for culture and a disregard for any civilisation other than their own bordering on the genocidal. We were the barbarians at the gates, the horde of hairy thugs come to rape, steal and pillage.

The following article by Justin Marozzi is a good starting point for developing a greater understanding and appreciation of the Islamic world and it’s achievements.

http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/mar/16/story-cities-day-3-baghdad-iraq-world-civilisation


Story of cities #3: the birth of Baghdad was a landmark for world civilisation

The foundation of al-Mansur’s ‘Round City’ in 762 was a glorious milestone in the history of urban design. It developed into the cultural centre of the world

 

3367

Illustration of Baghdad between 767 and 912.

If Baghdad today is a byword for inner-city decay and violence on an unspeakable scale, its foundation 1,250 years ago was a glorious milestone in the history of urban design. More than that, it was a landmark for civilisation, the birth of a city that would quickly become the cultural lodestar of the world.

Contrary to popular belief, Baghdad is old but not ancient. Founded in AD762 by the Abbasid caliph al-Mansur “The Victorious” as the new seat of his Islamic empire, in Mesopotamian terms it is more arriviste than grande dame – an upstart compared to Nineveh, Ur and Babylon (seventh, fourth and third millennium BC respectively).

Baghdad is a mere baby, too, when compared with Uruk, another ancient Mesopotamian urban settlement, which lays claim to being one of the world’s earliest cities and which was, sometime around 3,200BC, the largest urban centre on earth with a population estimated at up to 80,000. Some think the Arabic title for Babylonia, al-Iraq, is derived from its name.

We know a huge amount about the city’s meticulous and inspired planning thanks to detailed records of its construction. We are told, for instance, that when Mansur was hunting for his new capital, sailing up and down the Tigris to find a suitable site, he was initially advised of the favourable location and climate by a community of Nestorian monks who long predated Muslims in the area.

1802

An 1883 illustration of early Baghdad

According to the ninth-century Arab geographer and historian Yaqubi, author of The Book of Countries, its trade-friendly position on the Tigris close to the Euphrates gave it the potential to be “the crossroads of the universe”.

This was a retrospective endorsement. By the time Yaqubi was writing, Baghdad, City of Peace, had already become the centre of the world, capital of the pre-eminent Dar al-Islam, home to pioneering scientists, astronomers, poets, mathematicians, musicians, historians, legalists and philosophers.

This was by far the greatest construction project in the Islamic world

Once Mansur had agreed the site, it was time to embark on the design. Again we are told that this was entirely the caliph’s work. Under strict supervision he had workers trace the plans of his round city on the ground in lines of cinders. The perfect circle was a tribute to the geometric teachings of Euclid, whom he had studied and admired. He then walked through this ground-level plan, indicated his approval and ordered cotton balls soaked in naphtha (liquid petroleum) to be placed along the outlines and set alight to mark the position of the massively fortified double outer walls.

On 30 July 762, after the royal astrologers had declared this the most auspicious date for building work to begin, Mansur offered up a prayer to Allah, laid the ceremonial first brick and ordered the assembled workers to get cracking.

The scale of this great urban project is one of the most distinctive aspects of the story of Baghdad. With a circumference of four miles, the massive brick walls rising up from the banks of the Tigris were the defining signature of Mansur’s Round City. According to 11th-century scholar Al Khatib al Baghdadi – whose History of Baghdad is a mine of information on the construction of the city – each course consisted of 162,000 bricks for the first third of the wall’s height, 150,000 for the second third and 140,000 for the final section, bonded together with bundles of reeds. The outer wall was 80ft high, crowned with battlements and flanked by bastions. A deep moat ringed the outer wall perimeter.

5089

A street in Baghdad in 1918. Photograph: Print Collector/Getty Images

The workforce itself was of a stupendous size. Thousands of architects and engineers, legal experts, surveyors and carpenters, blacksmiths, diggers and ordinary labourers were recruited from across the Abbasid empire.

First they surveyed, measured and excavated the foundations. Then, using the sun-baked and kiln-fired bricks that had always been the main building material on the river-flooded Mesopotamian plains in the absence of stone quarries, they raised the fortress-like city walls brick by brick. This was by far the greatest construction project in the Islamic world: Yaqubi reckoned there were 100,000 workers involved.

The circular design was breathtakingly innovative. “They say that no other round city is known in all the regions of the world,” Khatib noted approvingly. Four equidistant gates pierced the outer walls where straight roads led to the centre of the city.

The Kufa Gate to the south-west and the Basra Gate to the south-east both opened on to the Sarat canal – a key part of the network of waterways that drained the waters of the Euphrates into the Tigris and made this site so attractive. The Sham (Syrian) Gate to the north-west led to the main road on to Anbar, and across the desert wastes to Syria. To the north-east the Khorasan Gate lay close to the Tigris, leading to the bridge of boats across it.

2953

The last remaining gate of the walls that once surrounded Baghdad. Photograph: Mohammed Jalil/EPA

For the great majority of the city’s life, a fluctuating number of these bridges, consisting of skiffs roped together and fastened to each bank, were one of the most picturesque signatures of Baghdad; no more permanent structure would be seen until the British arrived in the 20th century and laid an iron bridge across the Tigris.

A gatehouse rose above each of the four outer gates. Those above the entrances in the higher main wall offered commanding views over the city and the many miles of lush palm groves and emerald fields that fringed the waters of the Tigris. The large audience chamber at the top of the gatehouse above the Khorasan Gate was a particular favourite of Mansur as an afternoon retreat from the stultifying heat.

I have never seen a city of greater height, more perfect circularity, more endowed with superior merits
al-Jahiz

The four straight roads that ran towards the centre of the city from the outer gates were lined with vaulted arcades containing merchants’ shops and bazaars. Smaller streets ran off these four main arteries, giving access to a series of squares and houses; the limited space between the main wall and the inner wall answered to Mansur’s desire to maintain the heart of the city as a royal preserve.

The centre of Baghdad consisted of an immense central enclosure – perhaps 6,500 feet in diameter – with the royal precinct at its heart. The outer margins were reserved for the palaces of the caliph’s children, homes for the royal staff and servants, the caliph’s kitchens, barracks for the horse guard and other state offices.

The very centre was empty except for the two finest buildings in the city: the Great Mosque and the caliph’s Golden Gate Palace, a classically Islamic expression of the union between temporal and spiritual authority. No one except Mansur, not even a gout-ridden uncle of the caliph who requested the privilege on grounds of ill-health, was permitted to ride in this central precinct.

One sympathises with this elderly uncle of the caliph. Unmoved by his protestations of decrepit limbs, Mansur said he could be carried into the central precinct on a litter, a mode of transport generally reserved for women. “I will be embarrassed by the people,” his uncle Isa said. “Is there anyone left you could be embarrassed by?” the caliph replied caustically.

2550

A crane lifts the statue of al-Mansur after it was hit by an explosion in Baghdad in 2005. Photograph: Karim Sahib/AFP/Getty Images

Mansur’s palace was a remarkable building of 360,000 sq ft. Its most striking feature was the 130ft-high green dome above the main audience chamber, visible for miles around and surmounted by the figure of a horseman with a lance in his hand. Khatib claimed that the figure swivelled like a weathervane, thrusting his lance in the direction from which the caliph’s enemies would next appear.

Mansur’s great mosque was Baghdad’s first. Encompassing a prodigious 90,000 sq ft, it paid dutiful respect to Allah while emphatically conveying the message that the Abbasids were his most powerful and illustrious servants on earth.

By 766 Mansur’s Round City was complete. The general verdict was that it was a triumph. The ninth-century essayist, polymath and polemicist al-Jahiz was unstinting in his praise.

“I have seen the great cities, including those noted for their durable construction. I have seen such cities in the districts of Syria, in Byzantine territory, and in other provinces, but I have never seen a city of greater height, more perfect circularity, more endowed with superior merits or possessing more spacious gates or more perfect defences than Al Zawra, that is to say the city of Abu Jafar al-Mansur.” What he particularly admired was the roundness of the city: “It is as though it is poured into a mould and cast.”

The last traces of Mansur’s Round City were demolished in the early 1870s when Midhat Pasha, the reformist Ottoman governor, tore down the venerable city walls in a fit of modernising zeal. Baghdadis have since grown used to being excluded from the centre of their resilient capital.

Just as they had been barred from the inner sanctum of the city under Mansur, so were their 20th-century counterparts excluded from the heart of Baghdad on pain of death 12 centuries later under Saddam Hussein.

The heavily guarded district of Karadat Maryam, slightly south of the original Round City on the west bank, became the regime headquarters, the engine room of a giant machine carefully calibrated to cow, control and kill using the multiple security organisations that enabled a country to devour itself. Under the American occupation of 2003 it became the even more intensely fortified Green Zone, a surreal dystopia of six square miles in which Iraqis were largely unwelcome in their own capital.

Today, after a 12-year interlude, the Green Zone is open to Baghdadis again. But as so often in their extraordinarily bloody history, Iraqis find they have very little to cheer about as the country tears itself apart. The great city of Baghdad survives, but its people are once again engulfed in terrible violence.

Justin Marozzi is the author of Baghdad: City of Peace, City of Blood, winner of the Royal Society of Literature’s 2015 Ondaatje Prize.

______________

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on March 16, 2016, With 3852 Reads Filed under Middle East, World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

5 Responses to "Islamic Culture before Western meddling"

  1. Nannie  March 17, 2016 at 5:53 am

    Thank you for this great article!

  2. davor  March 16, 2016 at 3:47 pm

    For me Oscar for Hurt Locker was the complete moral and cultural end of Hollywood. Hollywood officially joined the rotten corpse of Goebbels that day.

  3. davor  March 16, 2016 at 3:43 pm

    Baghdad really, the crattle of civilization. Bush(s) administration is as if the plague and seven horrors have hit Iraq. Absolutely agree that in much of the meddling the Western folks were/are more barbaric than of what today the wide Muslim communities are accused of. And still they are looking to form completely unholy alliances like Saudi alliance against terrorism, where the top supporters of it are also organizers. That is not religious, even less advancement than middle ages muslim scholars. But tragedy is if someone in the western country reads in your passport that you have been to Baghdad their first association is that you must have been coming from hell or are associated with the devils. Also compliments for this go to Hollywood big time, like that shameful Oscars for The Hurt Locker and various propaganda movies.

  4. Jozsef V.  March 16, 2016 at 11:27 am

    This is a good article but I take issue with Mr. Greenhalgh’s introduction in which he mentions the Crusades. I will welcome being corrected, but AFAIK no Crusade was ever directed against Baghdad, or against Iraq. Thus, bringing the Crusades into a discussion of Iraq is a red herring. It’s not the Crusades that shed the blood of innocent Iraqis, but rather the British and American imperialists, colonizers, and neocons. So, why blame the Crusades for Britain’s and America’s sins in Iraq?
    For full disclosure’s sake: after Suleiman the Magnificent and the Ottoman Turks defeated Hungary in 1526, Hungary came under genocidal Ottoman occupation and plunder until it was finally liberated by a Polish-led Crusade in 1686. Perhaps you will excuse me, but I do view the Crusades in a very different way. The Ottomans exterminated 75% of the Hungarian population, and only the Crusades saved Hungary from total annihilation by the Muslim Ottomans.

    • HexFiendsOfJewNeurosalem  March 25, 2016 at 10:49 am

      Szintén magyar? 😀 jó site, néha kicsit tényleg minden igényt kielégít, de hát nem vagyok szakértő… a ‘két pogány’, a Habsburgok/németek/nyugatiak/keresztesek és a törökök közül sajnos nem a törökök/balkáni csatlósnépeik (akiket előreküldtek) a rosszabbak, a mongolok pedig teljes irtást végeztek… a Pozsonyi csatáról hallottál? az nem volt kereszteshadjárat? az egyik (ha nem az egyetlen) olyan nép ellen aki nem csak hogy nem gyártott nekik mártírokat a térítőikből, hanem már keresztény volt… az egész nyugat-kelet ellentét agymosásról hadd ajánljam figyelmedbe a youtubeon ezt az egész jó ki orosz előadást:
      watch?v=vjW4Fr6vDuA
      5:00-nál kezdődik a lényeg, csak pár perc a téma… ja és egyébként a ‘croissant’ (=kifliszerűség) eredettörténetéről már olvastál? 😀
      üdv

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH