Bob Nichols is a Project Censored Award winner, a former correspondent for the San Francisco Bay View newspaper and a frequent contributor to various online publications.

He reports on war, politics and the two nuclear weapons labs in the Bay Area. Nichols is writing a book based on 20 years of nuclear war in Central Asia. He is a former employee of an Army Ammunition Plant.

Follow Bob on YouTube channel, Nichols on Nuclear, Twitter, and visit his web site YourRadiationThisWeek.org

You are encouraged to write Nichols at duweapons@gmail.com


View Latest Posts >>>

Your Radiation This Week No 67 and 68

July 16 to July 30, 2016 Undeclared Nuclear War Continues

(San Francisco) July 30, 2016 – Good Day, this is “Your Radiation This Week” for the 2 week time period July 16, 2016 to July 30, 2016. These are the Top Recorded Radiation Highs that affected people for those 2 weeks around the United States.

Radiation CPM * City State

Zabriskie Point in Death Valley National Park, California

Zabriskie Point in Death Valley National Park, California

Listed in Counts per Minute, a Count is one Radioactive Decay Registered by the Instrument. The Top Reporting Radioactive Cities are listed. The highest radiation reporting city is listed first, the least radioactive city reporting is listed last.

Still, all reporting cities are above normal. These are a portion of the American cities that exceeded 1,000 CPM these past 2 weeks. 34 Cities are Reporting Radiation Above 1,000 CPM. Take precautions.

Normal Radiation is 5 to 20 CPM [4]

Rad   TIMES NORMAL CITY, STATE TYPE OF RAD Corrupted
2,186 CPM, 427.2 Times Normal, Phoenix, AZ. MIA Yes
1,916 CPM, 383.2 Times Normal, Louisville, KT. Beta, Gamma.  
1,711 CPM, 342.2 Times Normal, ColoradoSpringsCO Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,645 CPM, 329 Times Normal, San Diego, CA. Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,591 CPM, 318.2 Times Normal, Portland, ME. Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,390 CPM, 278 Times Normal, Little Rock, AR. Beta, Gamma.  
1,446 CPM, 289.2 Times Normal, Raleigh, NC.
Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,431 CPM, 286.2 Times Normal, Champaign, IL. Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,428 CPM, 285.6 Times Normal, Rochester, NY. Beta, Gamma.  
1,367 CPM, 273.4 Times Normal, Navajo Lake, NM. Beta, Gamma.  
1,363 CPM, 272.6 Times Normal, Mason City, IA. Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,355 CPM, 271 Times Normal, Worcester, MA. Beta, Gamma.  
1,299 CPM, 259.8 Times Normal, Idaho Falls, ID. Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,297 CPM, 259.4 Times Normal, Harrisonburg, VA. Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,234 CPM, 246.8 Times Normal, Spokane, WA. Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,199 CPM, 239.8 Times Normal, Louisville, KY. MIA Yes
1,199 CPM, 239.8 Times Normal, Pierre, SD. Beta, Gamma.
1,185 CPM, 237 Times Normal, Kansas City, KS. Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,177 CPM, 235.4 Times Normal, Fresno, CA. Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,173 CPM, 234.6 Times Normal, Billings, MT. Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,171 CPM, 234.2 Times Normal, New York City, NY. Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,159 CPM, 231.8 Times Normal, Madison, WI. Beta, Gamma.  
1,155 CPM, 231 Times Normal, Hartford, CT. Beta, Gamma.  
1,152 CPM, 230.4 Times Normal, Bakersfield, CA. Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,134 CPM, 226.8 Times Normal, Casper, Wyoming Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,103 CPM, 220.6 Times Normal, Riverside, CA. Beta, Gamma.  
1,102 CPM, 220.4 Times Normal, Denver, CO. Beta, Gamma. Yes
1,099 CPM, 219.8 Times Normal, Atlanta, GA. Beta, Gamma.
1,076 CPM, 215.2 Times Normal, Des Moines, IA Beta, Gamma.  
1,066 CPM, 213.2 Times Normal, Charleston, WV. Beta, Gamma.  
1,043 CPM, 208.6 Times Normal, Tucson, AZ. Beta, Gamma.  
1,030 CPM, 206 Times Normal, Lexington, KY. Beta, Gamma.  
1,021 CPM, 204.2 Times Normal, Aurora, IL Beta, Gamma.

Count – 34 Cities Reporting Radiation Above 1,000 CPM

Normal Radiation is 5 to 20 CPM [4]

Changes

The Combined Beta and Gamma Radiation numbers publication dates are changed to publication twice a month. The next publication date for the reporting cities’ Radiation Numbers is August 13, 2016.

The YRTW Table of poisoned American cities has changed by adding a Column on the Right hand side. It is labeled “Corrupted?” The purpose of the column is to provide guidance as to the reliability, consistency and truthfulness of an individual city’s High Rad reading for these last 2 weeks.

Since a city’s report is subject to many strongly felt opinions that can affect Rad Readings, whether or not the Rad Unit was reporting at least 168 Hours (24 X 7)  takes on additional importance. The number of hours the machines work in a week is not an opinion.

It is a documented fact; it is a number, a measure of efficiency. The unit either reported publicly; or it failed to do so 100% of the time. It can’t do both.

All things being equal there should be One Reading per Hour for 168 Rad readings a week. The corruption may originate with a machine error, programming glitch, human intervention or change, intended or not. Not reporting is an error; and quite possibly a crime.

Corrupted?

The response may be “Yes” for “Yes, it is corrupted.” The entry will be “Left Blank” for “Not Suspected.” The most common departure from normal radiation reporting is reporting less than 168 times a week.

New Category – MIA 1YrHigh
“MIA 1YrHigh” is a new category under the column labeled Type of Rad. It means “Missing in Action – 1 Year High.”

Follow Your Radiation This Week on Twitter, too, @YourRads 

Are you for state level murder charges for high level nuclear industry perps?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Have a wonderful radioactive weekend and remember to Dodge the Rads, it’s dangerous out there.

Copyright by Bob Nichols @ 2016. Reproduce and distribute, give full attribution to Bob Nichols at duweapons@gmail.com .


Notes and Sources

1  The Radiation charts and graphs of the EPA at http://www2.epa.gov/radnet Individual queries can be built at the EPA RadNet Query Builder. Don’t skip the “2” in www2.
2. The EPA based reporting of http://www.NETC.com an LLC.
3. These station’s Radiation equals combined Beta and Gamma Radiation. Note: Not all locations report Beta Radiation. Gamma Radiation Monitors are reporting publicly at all these locations.
4. Reference: Digilert 100 Flyer pdf, “Normal background is 5-20 CPM.” http://keison.co.uk/seinternational_digilert100.shtml Copyright @ 2015 Keison International Ltd – All Rights Reserved.
5. CPM. “Although we can’t see it, taste it, smell it or hear it we can measure radiation and observe its effects. One way to measure radiation which the United States Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] has chosen to use on its radiation websites is in Counts Per Minute. Each Count is One Radioactive Decay.”
Quote from the ‘Your Radiation, This Week.’” Apr 3, 2015. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/04/03/your-radiation-this-week/
6. Radiation destruction of chitin, IAEA, by Ershov, B.G.; Sukhov, N.L.; Nud’ga, L.A.; Baklagina, Yu.G.; Kozhevnikova, L.G.; Petropavlovskii, G.A. (Institute of Physical Chemistry, Moscow (Russian Federation)) https://inis.iaea.org/search/searchsinglerecord.aspx?recordsFor=SingleRecord&RN=26023735

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on July 30, 2016, With 4210 Reads Filed under Education, Environment, Life, Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

8 Responses to "Your Radiation This Week No 67 and 68"

  1. PeterAG  August 8, 2016 at 5:22 am

    Thanks for info. I realize when sampling 7 cities that the level doubled the past year from say 600 to 1300 cpm. 600 already being a ten to 20-fold increase if 30-60 is taken to be normal(You say 5-20 but that sounds a little low?)But this enormous increase is shocking. Just a thought from an outsider: Is it possible that a concerted effort may have been organized to contaminate all the equipment probing these levels so it isnt real?
    Are there any corroborating measurements by independent observers.
    I mean they have closed many measurement sites for temperature measurements and then faked the data for the purpose of aiding the climate change alarmist agenda. So I wonder could this be yet another deception?

    • Bob Nichols  August 8, 2016 at 6:01 am

      Hi PeterAG, … hmm, the thing to do amidst so much doubt, PeterAG, is start with the science and build a picture of the nuclear inventory over the past 70 years. Then you have proof, not conjecture dependent on anybody. So, that is what I set about to do. I also found a famous physicist in the EU who was doing something similar: Dr Paolo Scampa. …. Once you know the total inventory, PeterAG, all else falls into place with precision. Go to: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/07/29/fukushimas-melted-reactors-500-days-on/

      Its a rough ride for your thoughts and feelings; but, we’ve all got those, or we wouldn’t be human.

      Best to you in your search,

      Bob

  2. Altimometer  July 30, 2016 at 6:05 pm

    Hi Bob, an article posted here talked about the return of the M.A.D. men but I don’t believe both sides are controlled now. Another bad move by the western rulers. Thanks.

    • Bob Nichols  July 30, 2016 at 7:06 pm

      Hi Altimometer,

      Agreed. Good call. Altimometer.

      Bob

  3. PeterAG  July 30, 2016 at 12:44 pm

    Do you have a document or graph showing this trend over a longer period of time for a selection of probed cities?

    • Bob Nichols  July 30, 2016 at 12:53 pm

      PeterAG,

      Sure. Using your own computer you can easily lookup and Save, Print or Download Database histories 2 weeks at a time and Graphs up to seven years at a time.

      It is a pretty formidable package for those searching for Data.

      Bob

    • Bert  July 31, 2016 at 8:09 pm

      Graphs are available on Radnet and also on Bob’s source #2 above (Netc.com). I find graphs there are quicker than Radnet for periods longer than 4 months. Just click on a city’s symbol (ID’s starting with a 5: are the EPA gamma sites showing one of the energy ranges). Choose “Click here for data charts”, and the 2 week chart shows. Pull down the bottom right box for any period up to 7 years. Of course Radnet itself shows all the energy ranges, but they mostly rise and fall together.
      ##########
      Hi Bert,

      That’s a pretty good Comment, Bert. Congrats.

      One correction though, the default 1st graph on Netc dot com is a one week graph; or a graph of gamma for the past 7 days.

      Bests,

      Bob

    • Ace  October 25, 2016 at 9:28 am

      Bob, you weekly radiation report is completely bogus. Yes, the cpm numbers your pulling from Radnet are real, but the way your representing them is 100% misleading. Read what they say about this in the netc forum: https://www.netc.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1326

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network