Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.

He is Host of TRUTH JIHAD RADIO; a hard driving weekly LIVE call in radio show. He also has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.

Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.


View Latest Posts >>>

Yes, the election WAS stolen – so who “sent” Trump?

“This was a historic show! Nailed the new 9/11 a few days after it happened!” -Allan Rees, No Lies Radio. (Watch this historic episode of False Flag Weekly News above, and click HERE for story links.)

By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

Who sent “The Don”?

When a mafiosi suddenly shows up and makes a splash – rubs somebody out, moves in on one of the rackets – the cognoscenti ask: Who sent him? That is the question we should have been asking about career mafia front-man Donald Trump many, many months ago.

Actually, here at VT, we WERE asking. The rest of you should be asking: Why was Trump’s mafia background completely blacked out of both the mainstream and pseudo-alternative media? Why was VT practically alone in harping on it, day after day, fighting an uphill battle against the Trump kool aid drinkers?

Come on, people! This whole Trump thing didn’t “just happen.”

“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.” – Franklin D. Roosevelt

How long ago was it “planned that way”? Some folks think The Simpsons have been in on it for sixteen years!

simpsons

We all know they can rig voting machines. But can they really rig sixteen-year-old Simpsons re-runs?

Obviously the media was in on it, Simpsons or no Simpsons. They didn’t give Trump all that free publicity just for the hell of it. When Bernie Sanders was doing better than Trump, the media was giving Trump 200 times as much coverage. Sure, it LOOKED like mostly negative coverage. But it was “useful negative coverage” calculated to boost Trump, not eliminate him.

And regarding those voting machines…it isn’t just Gordon Duff saying the math doesn’t add up. NYU professor Mark Crispin Miller, a leading expert on election fraud, just published a piece entitled:

Exit polls suggest that Trump’s big “victory” was stolen (just like Hillary’s nomination)

The five percent discrepancy between the exit polls and “results” in the key swing states of North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are smoking-gun proof. Exit polls virtually never diverge from results by more than one percent unless either the polls or the “results” have been rigged.

Our two other top election fraud experts, Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman, pointed out several months ago that:

  1. Millions of likely Democratic voters have already been stripped from the voter rolls in critical states like Ohio.  The key reporting on this has been done by the great Greg Palast (www.gregpalast.com), who has shown a computer program coordinated by the Republican Secretary of State of Kansas is being used in some two dozen states to steal from a substantial percentage of the citizenry their right to vote.  The raw numbers are high enough they could have a significant impact on the presidential, US Senate, House and many other elections this fall.   2. There is no way to verify the official tally on the electronic machines on which the majority of Americans will vote this fall.  Nearly all the machines are a decade old, most are controlled by a single company (ES&S, owned by Warren Buffett) and the courts have ruled that the software is proprietary, making the vote counts beyond public scrutiny.  In fact, they are beyond all independent monitoring altogether.  In many key swing states (including Ohio, Michigan, Iowa and Arizona) GOP governors and Secretaries of State will have a free hand to flip the vote count to whatever they want it to be without detection or accountability.  This could turn control of our government come November, as it did in 2000 and 2004.  

Gordon points out that ten million Democratic votes seem to have “gone missing.”  And while there are other possible explanations – Hillary’s unpopularity being the most obvious – Democratic turnout should not have been down that much, even with a weak candidate, given Trump’s ultra-high negatives among prospective Democratic voters, especially women and minorities. The exit polling data cited by Mark Crispin Miller shows that Gordon was right. This election was stolen, just as  Trump pre-emptively announced it would be. (Accusing the other guy of what you’re doing yourself is what the Zionist Mob does best – as exemplified by their incessant accusations that the Palestinians are the ones pushing the Israelis into the sea.)

As for “who sent Trump,” we can safely assume that the mob Trump has always fronted for – the Meyer Lansky-Bronfman-Netanyahu Axis of Evil – is, shall we say, involved. These are, as Gordon says, basically the same guys who did 9/11. Figures they’d be the ones to do 11/9.

comptoby

How does this fit into the larger globalist plan? Will a huge false flag give Trump dictatorial powers far beyond those of Bush and Obama, and shove him in the direction of a pre-planned major war? Or has he been set up to fail, as I suggested in a recent article?

Stay tuned to Veterans Today and False Flag Weekly News … and don’t say we didn’t warn you.

 

 

 

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

170643AFVC Veterans Holidays Banners_728x90
Posted by on November 11, 2016, With 23293 Reads Filed under Democracy & Elections, Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

26 Responses to "Yes, the election WAS stolen – so who “sent” Trump?"

  1. Susa  November 17, 2016 at 5:42 am

    ““In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.” – Franklin D. Roosevelt
    How long ago was it “planned that way”?”

    Good question. Already Nostradamus knew about this picture which is directing to the IIIWW. Putin and Trump (Chabad Lubavichi and Netanyahu behind them) have a deal, the US staying out of Russia’s forthcoming aggressions in Europe. “Muslims” or Israel backed Isis will attack to Southern Europe co-operating openly or secretly with Russia (Chabad Lubavichi). I mean Nostradamus KNEW it!!!

    Read this:

    Century I: 40
    The false trumpet concealing madness
    will cause Byzantium to change its laws.
    From Egypt there will go forth a man who wants
    the edict withdrawn, changing money and standards.

    Century I: 57
    The trumpet shakes with great discord.
    An agreement broken: lifting the face to heaven:
    the bloody mouth will swim with blood;
    the face anointed with milk and honey lies on the ground.

    So, at the end Trump will break a deal and US will get involved in the war.

    This appoints clearly to Hillary Clinton: “adulterous lady”:

    It said Nostradamus had been translated as saying: “He will enter wicked, unpleasant, infamous, tyrannizing over Mesopotamia.
    “All friends made by the adulterous lady, land dreadful and black of aspect.”

    Hillary Clinton created those “black of aspect”.

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/598434/Nostradamus-predict-ISIS-prophecies-linked-extremists-what-happens-next-Hitler-war

  2. de_Borne  November 13, 2016 at 11:35 am

    Kevin, shame on you and your guest host. Trump did not go to Israel and ‘come back a changed man’. Netanyahu met with him AND Clinton in a New York Hotel in September 2016. Trump canceled trips to Israel; “It’s a tradition, but I’m not traditional,” said Trump.

  3. Doc Walt  November 13, 2016 at 10:29 am

    Great discussion! This looks like a passing of the baton from one criminal organization to another or maybe just the new generation of the old ones. Finally Duff put it altogether. Wish it had been a few days earlier. However the whole circus points a finger directly at the mass media, and that is a lesson for both sides. Trump couldn’t have gotten away with half-truths if it wasn’t for the mass media which offers no truth. Where is George Carlin when we need him?

  4. JS  November 13, 2016 at 6:50 am

    Dr Barrett, I hate to rain on your parade, and I believe there is predictive programming, but in the case of this Simpsons thing, it’s overblown. Yes, the West looks similar. But the entire Northeast is all wrong. And if Trump had got the states as shown in the Simpsons map, he would have lost by a mile. So it’s a joke.

    I am more interested in why the SecState, John Kerry, felt the need to get out of the country before the election when the stakes were so high, and to go on a 9-day trip abroad, including Antarctica. He is still away. Rat leaving the ship?

  5. Garry Compton  November 13, 2016 at 12:01 am

    The only poll I thought was correct was the Rasmussen Poll that said 50 to 60% of Americans think Clinton should be indicted and 70% of Americans saw that she illegally handled classified documents. No one in America could have more than 20% of the voters support — if you believed that poll — I did. Time will tell but if Russia and the US are better off Trump – OK We are all on Death Row – anyways.

  6. Amelius  November 12, 2016 at 10:50 pm

    I noticed the Facebook comment by Iseult Marks, says Steve Pieczenik is a supporter and maybe even a handler of Trump. Is this the same Steve Pieczenik that helped lay the foundation for counter terrorism at the state department, served under five different presidents and admitted on the record in April of 2002, that Osama bin laden died in 2001?

  7. yelloweye  November 12, 2016 at 12:20 pm

    “in L.A. u just assume everyone you see is equally demoralized & stricken with fear & confusion.
    Obviously the media was in on it, Simpsons or no Simpsons. They didn’t give Trump all that free publicity just for the hell of it. When Bernie Sanders was doing better than Trump, the media was giving Trump 200 times as much coverage. Sure, it LOOKED like mostly negative coverage. But it was “useful negative coverage” calculated to boost Trump, not eliminate him.
    And regarding those voting machines…it isn’t just Gordon Duff saying the math doesn’t add up. NYU professor Mark Crispin Miller, a leading expert on election fraud, just published a piece entitled: …
    ______
    The Simpsons/Writers http://tinyurl.com/jyj92fq
    ______
    A Simpsons writer:
    ‘Why I predicted Donald Trump would become President of the United States’. He has predicted the crash of the U.S.A. Economy. 15:45, 11 Nov 2016
    ______
    “I fought. I lost. Now I rest.”

    “Eat My Shorts!”

    Trump should resist neocon & shadow gov’t influence to justify people’s hopes
    – Ron Paul to RT
    11 Nov, 2016 04:11

    It does not look like it will be over until the U.S.A. Economy craters, Lisa sits in The Oval Office and the Fat Bitch Sings … that was the deal eh?

  8. Trakkath  November 12, 2016 at 1:34 am

    Die ewigen Zionisten Teil 1
    ht tp://schaebel. de/allgemein/die-ewigen-zionisten-teil-1/006564/

  9. wjabbe  November 11, 2016 at 7:12 pm

    Did Jersey photographer’s video of Clinton stumble change course of history?
    Updated: NOVEMBER 11, 2016 — 12:04 PM EST
    QUOTE FROM ABOVE ARTICLE:
    “In the days after Donald Trump’s stunning presidential win over Hillary Clinton, Zdenek Gazda has been bombarded by phone calls and texts, telling him he changed the election.
    He doesn’t disagree with them.
    Gazda is a freelance photographer from New Jersey who filmed the video of Clinton after she became ill and stumbled at a campaign event two months ago.
    “People say to me that it showed she’s not strong,” Gazda said on Friday. “If I wasn’t there, nobody would have known what happened….People need to know the truth.”
    Some believe the video raised questions about whether Clinton was healthy enough to serve in the White House.
    Gazda, 50, said he has taken thousands of photos and videos in his career, but the feedback from his encounter with Clinton still stuns him.
    “Nothing close to it,” he said.
    A version of his video has been viewed more than two million times on YouTube.
    Gazda used some old-school journalism instincts and was the only person near Clinton when she wobbled and appeared to collapse Sept. 11 after visiting a 9/11 memorial ceremony in New York City….”
    “Gazda, who had made more than $100,000 for his famous 20-second clip, said after he turned off his video, said he saw Clinton shaking inside the Van..”

  10. David Ansible  November 11, 2016 at 3:35 pm

    I can certainly see the fear of a false flag attack capitalizing on Trump’s perceived predilections. I can also see Trump being hampered, boxed in, and deceived by confederates in his administration and in the intelligence agencies and Pentagon. Here is a short vid of Ron Paul on RT talking about Trump and the deep state:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0m1gnK8JjLY

  11. David Ansible  November 11, 2016 at 3:13 pm

    And yes Kevin, we would agree, reduced turnout could be quite easily explained in “other ways,” lol.
    Here’s one to chew on: Obama’s total included massive and unusual turnout from the African American community and others due to obvious reasons, such as for example being the first African American President. John Kerry’s turnout in 2004? 59 million. Hillary as possibly the first female president did not generate the same kind of interest. People were also very ambivalent about Hillary. Hillary’s numbers are not shocking in the least.

    • Agin  November 11, 2016 at 4:48 pm

      Perhaps Kevin of Arabia (trying to keep a sense of humor) is suffering from the effects of Djedi Mind Tricks (Denial is not a river in Egypt). Or it is likely Mr. Atzmon is correct with his Pre Traumatic Stress Syndrome analysis.

      A Pocket Full oF(ord) White Dragon Society Rolling Stones? Oracle. Please Don’t Stop the Music. Radio GaGa. Freddie Mercury. Built a Wall (of Mirrors) to reveal the House Built on Sand(ers). London Bridge is Burning Down.

      Did Neo-Liberals build their Clinton base of off Bernie Sanders’ corpse (WeekNd at Bernie’s) and are now asking where 10 Million votes went? Or was it Ron Paul 2.0? SAIC. (KA)LeidoS(cope). Stargate. Booz Allen. Prism. SnowDon. Alexander the Great. SoroS. Total Recall. Astana. Cydonia. Enter the SithEAns.

      “And for all these reasons I have decided to scalp you and burn your village to the ground.”

    • Kevin Barrett  November 11, 2016 at 7:06 pm

      Kerry was massively robbed in 2004, as documented by Fitrakis et. al. He got many millions more than the official 59 million. And as much as you and I loathe Hillary, the pro-Democrat vote this year turned out big time (read Duff’s article for the reported numbers, which later disappeared) due to widespread loathing for Trump, who has higher negatives than any candidate in history.

    • David Ansible  November 11, 2016 at 8:10 pm

      Okay, I looked back at what Duff said. Projected voter turnout was not realized on election day. I did find the following regarding this year’s turnout, which was relatively high but below Obama numbers: “The drop in turnout was uneven. On average, turnout was unchanged in states that voted for Trump, while it fell by an average of 2.3 percentage points in states that voted for Clinton. Relatedly, turnout was higher in competitive states — most of which Trump won. In the 14 swing states — those where either the winning party in the presidential race switched from 2012 or where the margin was within 5 percentage points — an average of 65.3 percent of eligible voters cast ballots. In the other 36 states and Washington, D.C., turnout averaged just 56.3 percent.That gap exacerbates a tendency for turnout to be higher in the places where candidates concentrate their travel, advertising and other get-out-the-vote efforts.” So, if this is true, diminished turnout did not particularly hurt Clinton. Info is from fivethirtyeight.com, a site I know nothing about….

    • Agin  November 11, 2016 at 8:16 pm

      The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations is a British not for profit organisation concerned with group behaviour and organisational behaviour. It was initiated during 1946, when it separated from the Tavistock Clinic. Many of these founding members of the Tavistock Institute went on to play major roles in psychology. John Rawlings Rees became first president of the World Federation for Mental Health.[1] Jock Sutherland became director of the new post-war Tavistock Clinic, when it was incorporated into the newly established British National Health Service during 1946. Ronald Hargreaves became deputy director of the World Health Organization. Tommy Wilson became chairman of the Tavistock Institute.[1][2]

      A countercultural nightmare of mass psychosis and hysteria with a potentially dangerous end result.

    • David Ansible  November 11, 2016 at 8:44 pm

      Also, regardless of projections, it seems to me that fewer Democrats were energized by Clinton. This was mentioned many times in the media in the run up to the election. There were fears expressed that Clinton would not get out the vote. I would have and did expect a drop off from Obama numbers. I do not believe that fear of Trump was nearly as strong a motivation to vote, as Obama running for President was, esp. amongst African Americans. And the prevailing opinion seemed to be that the election was in the bag, another disincentive. Conversely, Trump probably brought many people to the polls who rarely if ever vote. I am aware of this happening amongst people I know. I am also aware that rigging occurs. The Mike Connell situation comes to mind. The question is whether Trump’s the guy they’d want to rig it for. I am doubtful. I do not believe the choice was Trump. It was Hillary or Jeb. I must admit, I am bothered by the result in that it conflicts with my usual hypothesis that things do get manipulated regularly. Why would they have let Trump in? Maybe they allowed Trump in and think they can manage or use him to their advantage. Maybe counterbalancing forces in the deep state prevented systemic rigging. Maybe not. Don’t know for sure. I must admit though, I am somewhat dubious about this idea of massive rigging out of fear of Hillary. Certainly the neocons seemed happy enough w/ her….

    • Agin  November 12, 2016 at 11:53 am

      One last note with regards to “Purple Reign” and the “Purple Revolution”…remember the tie swap of the first debate.

  12. MaoSayTongue  November 11, 2016 at 3:06 pm

    The simplest answer to the question is: The Knights of Malta. They also selected Bill and Hillary, Barack Obama, and George W. Bush in 1988–all as foils. They were working against the British System Federal Reservists who killed Kennedy. The goal was to institute, finally, the Hamiltonian Plan and Americanism.

    What they didn’t know was that their operation had been penetrated by a Rhodesian/Zimbabwean superspy working for Robert Mugabe . . ..

  13. David Ansible  November 11, 2016 at 3:01 pm

    Hate to break it to you, but trumptastic voyage was actually released 7.7.15.
    Somebody is drinking the kool aid, could be you Kevin.

    • NojevejeC  November 11, 2016 at 3:12 pm

      Matt Groening: “We predicted that he would be president back in 2000”
      USA Today article:
      ‘The Simpsons’ predicted Donald Trump would be president back in 2000
      Kevin is not drinking Kool Aid.

    • David Ansible  November 11, 2016 at 3:21 pm

      trumptastic voyage is from 2015. Trump had been flirting with running for President during the nineties. It was suggested that he might run several times including on Oprah. The Simpsons was not pulling this out of nowhere. Do you really think Matt Groenig had the blueprint for 2016? I mean really? No it was just a fanciful idea put into the simpsons, one that had been floating around in the culture already.

    • NojevejeC  November 11, 2016 at 3:30 pm

      My mistake it is not the same episode, but in this episode from 2000 Lisa references Trump as being president she succeeded.

  14. MileHighLife  November 11, 2016 at 2:20 pm

    Regarding the Simpsons clip…don’t forget the real life escalator footage of Trump (used in many pro-Hillary ads), referring to a ten year old girl sharing the escalator, that he “was going to marry her in ten years”.

    • MileHighLife  November 11, 2016 at 2:55 pm

      I should add that the Trump “escalator” video is from the 90’s, well before the Simpsons episode aired.

      The co-creators of the Simpsons went to Harvard. The same Harvard connected with Yales not-so-secret secret society Skull & Boners, the S&M, pedo-lovin'”club” that Bush and Kerry are rumored to have shared a coffin for a night, while naked, during their “initiation”.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network