LA Times suppresses truth on San Bernardino false flag

Mainstream media's fake news must not be questioned

The LA Times "fake news" story scripted by the false flag perps sanctifies the long-debunked Official Conspiracy Theory, which is now a "public myth" that we are not allowed to question.

The LA Times “fake news” story, presumably scripted by the false flag perps, sanctifies the long-debunked Official Conspiracy Theory, which is now a “public myth” that we are not allowed to question.

Listen to my complaint to the Los Angeles Times in the above audio file – then lodge your own complaint:  (877) 554-4000

By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

The Los Angeles Times has published an Operation Mockingbird-style fake news story designed to obscure the truth about last year’s San Bernardino shooting.

Dissenting comments on the article are forbidden.

27 leading public intellectuals discuss false flags in general and the Paris and San Bernardino attacks in particular. Now available on Amazon.

27 leading public intellectuals discuss false flags in general and the Paris and San Bernardino attacks in particular. Now available on Amazon.

Today’s LA Times disinformation piece, published on this, the first anniversary of the 12/2/15 shooting at the Inland Regional Center, raises questions concerning the much-discussed problem of “fake news.” The mainstream media, backed by big  internet companies like Google and Facebook, claim that dissenting alternative media outlets are the prime source of “fake news” stories. But what happens when the mainstream media itself publishes fake news?

In reality, the mainstream media is almost nothing but fake news: The vast majority of mainstream “news” stories begin as press releases, that is, lies or spin generated for profit by a private, interested party. Only a small fraction of these paid propaganda puff pieces are ever seriously vetted by journalists before publication.

And if a mainstream journalist wants to write the truth about an important issue, he or she had better hope that nobody with money or power objects. Since virtually all mainstream news outlets are owned by the same six corporations with interlocking boards – meaning they are in essence owned by the same mega-corporation, itself owned and operated by and for the plutocracy – it is no longer possible for any mainstream outlet to seriously offend any powerful player.

The people who blew up the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001, and have since then massacred thousands in such follow-up operations as Bali, Madrid, London, Mumbai, Boston, Paris, San Bernardino, and Orlando, are powerful players. No wonder the LA Times chose to publish the perps’ press release as an “anniversary news story.”

The LA Times headline unveils the story as a classic misdirection ploy:

“A year after the San Bernardino terror attack, the FBI is still struggling to answer key questions”

The headline and article mislead the reader by admitting that there are still unanswered questions about the attack, but then lying about what the real questions are, and about who is or is not really trying to answer them. The false flag terror perps chose this strategy as an attempt to blow smoke over the real questions about the attack raised by real journalists (the alternative media):

Why did multiple eyewitnesses report that the shooters were “three large white paramilitaries” – a shooter team that could not possibly be mistaken for a bearded brown-skinned Muslim guy and his diminutive female alleged accomplice?

Why did police (or intelligence agents/organized crime assets whose cover job is police work) handcuff and execute the two Muslim patsies in a police car, then dump the bodies on the sidewalk?

Why was the most important alleged crime scene (the patsies’ apartment) not preserved according to normal police procedure, but instead immediately opened for a media propaganda stunt so that any evidence there would be ransacked, contaminated or destroyed?

The LA Times refuses to even acknowledge the existence of false flag interpretations of the shooting, and ruthlessly suppresses any such mention from its comments section. Instead, the official “radical Muslims did it” myth is taken for granted, and the “questions” that the FBI is supposedly “struggling to answer” involve whether any MORE “radical Muslims” might have known something was up. Such “reporting” should qualify everyone responsible for this story, including the LA Times management, for quick rendition to the Hague to be tried for the crime against humanity known as “propaganda for genocide.”

The LA Times “Mockingbird” piece refers to two previous proven false flags, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and the 2013 Boston bombing. But instead of citing the work of real journalists and investigators like the Oklahoma City Bombing Investigation Committee (whose work culminated in the documentary A Noble Lie) and Dave Lindorff (listen to my interview with him), the Times cites apparent intelligence agents working academic and think tank cover jobs who blow smoke over these events:

Brian Jenkins, a terrorism expert and senior advisor to Rand Corp.’s president, cited the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing case as another example in which terrorism investigators pieced together many of the facts but failed to answer all the questions. “When you are recreating the events before and after an attack, there are lot of pieces and sometimes there are gaps,” Jenkins said.

“There are always going to be untied threads,” said Brian Levin, a terrorism expert and director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at Cal State San Bernardino.

This is the “we’ll never really know” defense, designed to discourage real investigation by implying that the “unanswered questions” involve minor issues, rather than the false flag elephant in the living room.

More than 53 major false flag operations have been admitted to by the government responsible for the attack:

1-false-flag-list

Most of the 55 leading public intellectuals represented in my False Flag Trilogy understand the scope and importance of false flag operations.

Yet the mainstream media will not even mention the issue…despite the fact that every major “left wing extremist” terror attack during the Cold War is now admitted to have been staged by Operation Gladio, run by elements of the Pentagon through its NATO assets; and despite the fact that FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds has stated that Gladio continues as “Operation Gladio B” staging false flag attacks blamed on “Islamic extremists.”

It’s time to end the genocide propaganda, expose the “war on terror” as the false flag farce that it is, take down the Gladio B network, bust the complicit Big Media into thousands of tiny pieces, and restore Constitutional governance.

 

 

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on December 2, 2016, With 3803 Reads Filed under Investigations, Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

10 Responses to "LA Times suppresses truth on San Bernardino false flag"

  1. Bartered  December 3, 2016 at 11:15 pm

    If these false flags are ever proven to be drills gone live and this information is somehow submitted by a worthy and trusted news source, its the end of the MSM. The prospect is impossibly easy because the only trusted news source for the masses is the MSM. Until this changes, nothing changes. Its probably why the US government doesnt like the free internet. Too much free speech might allow a little truth to get through, like you tube.

  2. davor  December 2, 2016 at 6:49 pm

    Mainstream media are probably more powerful than anything human or gun solid from US military and arms arsenal. Just looking at WWII outcome the msm media have made involvement in US percentage in all WWII European battles and operations turn from actual less than 20 % into more like 70% and a game saver. The mythical creatures in their stories are like greek gods, often skin changers and described with angelic vigilante volatility or with demonic war crime posession. The fake and its evil shady patterns have become more visible and recognizable thanks to by the day more and more online resorts (VT, RT, the social groups etc.) for truth telling in English and the western msm is dying a slow but a tenure track death. They are busted.

    • Trakkath  December 3, 2016 at 3:16 am

      It is said that the word is mightier than the sword. They try to supress the truth but the truth will pop up again and again until it is accepted. And truth needs no schield nor “guardians of lies” like Churchill said.

  3. Altimometer  December 2, 2016 at 3:29 pm

    Always gaps in information when recreating events and no problems reporting on the truth, only recreating the truth from factuality. Fiction reporting~ what a career.

  4. Agin  December 2, 2016 at 1:05 pm

    Mr. Barrett, you are a “White” muslim. Take Mr. Kadyrov (Chechnya) for example. Does the Harvest of the Steppe ring any bells? Arab slave trade? Islam is not a skin color but having “White” skin would help with infiltrating the West and blending in.

    • Kevin Barrett  December 2, 2016 at 2:00 pm

      Terrific suggestion. Where can I apply for a position as “Slave Raider of the Steppes”? Can you write me a recommendation?

    • Agin  December 2, 2016 at 2:12 pm

      You already have a position as Arab Imperial Minister of Propaganda.

    • Kevin Barrett  December 2, 2016 at 3:27 pm

      Damn! I’m the Imperial MINISTER! That is high praise indeed. Now please tell the Ministry, they seem to have misplaced my paychecks.

    • Agin  December 2, 2016 at 8:51 pm

      Did I strike a nerve? Deflecting from my original comment only proves the point. The “three large white paramilitaries” does NOT exclude them from being MUSLIM.

  5. concernedvet5  December 2, 2016 at 10:24 am

    This article disappeared down the memory hole quite quickly afterwards.

    [“Dwight Thomas and Jose Rocha were driving home from work in San Bernardino, California, on Wednesday when they saw a dark SUV pass them.”

    “The SUV was driving really slow, like it was out for a casual drive,” Thomas tells PEOPLE. “I saw the driver, a white guy with his hair slicked back looking like he didn’t have a care in the world.”

    After apparently spotting authorities pursuing them, the individuals in the vehicle began “throwing metal objects out of the car,” Thomas says. The objects are thought to be pipe bombs, according to authorities.

    “They started chasing them down a side street and the driver stopped his car,” Thomas adds. “A minute later, he jumped out of the car and fired on police, and they dropped him.” ]

    http://people.com/crime/san-bernardino-shooting-witnesses-tell-people-of-police-chase-and-shootout/

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network