Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.

He is Host of TRUTH JIHAD RADIO; a hard driving weekly LIVE call in radio show. He also has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.

Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.


View Latest Posts >>>

BOMBSHELL! Kissinger explains why neocons (not Russia) hacked the election for Trump

Was this REALLY the horse Trump rode in on? We don’t think so!

By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

Why are we being bombarded with mainstream propaganda telling us “Russia hacked the election for Trump”?

To figure out what’s really going on, we need to read between the lines. And every so often, a mainstream article inadvertently offers us a glimpse of the man behind the curtain.

Such is the case with the recent Forbes article “Trump’s Election Spoils Putin’s Narrative To The Russian People.” I have not done a background check on the attributed author, Paul Roderick Gregory, because I don’t need to. Clearly this guy is playing the neocon-Straussian game of writing on two levels: at the surface, spouting his team’s propaganda line for the masses; while esoterically dropping hints about the “deep game” for his fellow sophisticates.

The neocons are chosenites at best, Satanists at worst. Their achilles heel is hubris: the heartfelt belief that they are smarter than anybody else, and therefore the only ones who can read between the lines.

So put on your thinking caps, dear readers, and consider the implications of what Kissinger/Gregory are telling us:

*Putin did NOT hack the election for Trump. (True)

*Putin did NOT believe that Trump could win. (True – the polls were right, Putin like everyone else believed them, Trump should have lost, the election WAS rigged…but not by Russia.)

*The election hack was executed using “Russian” cutouts, with the predicable consequence that: “The likely result of a serious investigation would be a strong suspicion that Putin ordered the hacks because such operations ‘require high-level approval.’ The Kremlin will continue to invoke ‘plausible deniability,’ and we may have to increasingly take action (against Russia) in the absence of certainty of guilt.”

*And take action we will! Trump’s presidency will likely be (as it was planned to be) a closet escalation of the war on Russia (as well as Iran and China): “A victorious Clinton would offer Putin hostile predictability, but her base would restrain her from an aggressive military and foreign policy. Trump would be unpredictable, would build up US armed forces, and have to make strong deals (with neocons – “strong deals” such as false flags? -KB) to meet his electoral promises (or make everybody forget them! -KB). Even worse for Putin, Trump would promote US energy development and drive down the energy prices on which Putin’s Petrostate rests.”

Translation: Neocon godfather Kissinger, Bush’s #1 choice for 9/11 Commission czar, has just explained why his team selected and inserted Trump. The Obama/Brzezinski strategy of mollifying Iran, sidelining Bibi, and avoiding direct military confrontation with Russia and Syria and Iran and China wasn’t…shall we say…robust enough for neocon tastes. These people want all-out war, and they want it now!

Kissinger/Gregory explain that Trump is “unpredictable” meaning he can be lured, tricked or blackmailed into neocon adventures. He is massively increasing the military budget and the nuclear weapons stockpile (especially the “highly useable” and “highly deniable” mini-nukes so beloved by the neocons, both for pulverizing/poisoning Muslims and for false flag operations). And he will accelerate the economic war on Russia using the plunge protection team (under cover of “US energy development”) to  collapse energy prices.

Trump will be in a perfect position to play neocon-driven hardball against Russia without anybody in the US objecting: His detractors have been brainwashed into hating Putin; while his supporters love everything he says and does, no matter how nutty. Surrounded by Iran-hating Bibi Netanyahu stooges, Trump may start the expanded war against Russia by attacking Iran, whether (in)directly, through a nod and a wink at Bibi, or by sanctioning an attempted coup d’état in Tehran (which, I predict, will fail even more miserably than previous US schemes against the Islamic Republic).

The Forbes article displays Kissinger/Gregory cackling in glee at their own cleverness. They think they suckered Putin into making lots of pro-Trump noises for domestic consumption, setting Putin up as the patsy for Bibi’s hack of the American election and the coming era of neocon-Trump warmongering. Now the serious anti-Russia action begins. As the authors tell us:

Trump’s election leaves Putin with a choice. He can use his propaganda to turn Trump into a monster on par with George Bush, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton or he can use the brief window of a positive US presidential figure to explore whether there are real opportunities to repair US-Russian relations  abjectly surrender. (Authors’ words in strikeout typeface; my translation in boldface.)

Obviously Kissinger/Gregory are deeply worried about “Putin’s propaganda,” much of which consists of using truth for strategic effect, as with the leak of Victoria Nuland’s famous five billion dollar coup d’état in Ukraine. They want Putin to stop doing that, by going even further toward handing RT and Sputnik over to the Atlanticist/Zionist bankster-owned faction that has already largely defanged Russian English-language media. (Since that faction bit off a bigger chunk of RT a few years ago I have been persona non grata there, because I tell the truth about 9/11, false flags, Zionism, and Rothschild bankster dictatorship – the four topics RT ought to be harping on 24/7/365 but is no longer allowed to even mention.)

Putin and everyone else who wants a peaceful multipolar world — a category that may even include Donald Trump himself and at least a couple of his advisors and appointees — should recognize the monumental swindle Bibi, Henry the K, and their neocon team have pulled off, and get ready to start pushing back.

 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on January 5, 2017, With 9039 Reads Filed under Government & Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

9 Responses to "BOMBSHELL! Kissinger explains why neocons (not Russia) hacked the election for Trump"

  1. Howard T.Lewis III  February 2, 2017 at 3:13 pm

    Have ya’ll figured out the WTC nuke demolition system, how the overall 1,300 foot breeder reactors worked?

  2. joetv  January 6, 2017 at 9:32 am

    Every thing should be put to referendum. From a Presidential election to questions like should 1 group from 1 religion or ideology be able to own 98% of the media as we know it. Should representatives of 2% of the population be 30% of the employees of say, the judiciary or the state department. I mean you get the idea. Right? When the board gets tilted like that it means trouble. Imagine 30% of our judges being made men of Italian heritage. Replace the word Italian with Israeli or Zionist and, that’s what we have. It’s not antisemitism if it’s the truth. It’s a fact. Another question? Should those with dual citizenship be allowed to hold public office? Kissinger is a dual citizen. To what country is his primary loyalty? Has anyone asked? Should Americans have to worry about that?

  3. joetv  January 6, 2017 at 9:10 am

    “Cake or death? … Sorry, we’re all out of cake”. Monty Python
    It’s a shame that Clinton is such a thief and, worse. Why she was the DNC pick should really be studied.
    And as for Trump? Well I’m sorry to say it is biz as usual, only now on steroids.
    Since 911 corruption in politics has become so huge it can not be hidden. Rather than lie and say it can’t happen here, in America; the elites don’t believe the public is a threat and, so what if it is, the local police can handle it. They have tanks.
    If one graphs the dollars stolen in broad daylight this past 15 years. The line takes off like a rocket. Straight up. There is a group out there which knows who will be president in 2036.

  4. srjonesad  January 5, 2017 at 6:27 pm

    Thanks for this one Mr Barrett.

  5. Trakkath  January 5, 2017 at 5:07 pm

    A negative sell of a candidate is in every case the same like a positive for those behind the scenes who benefit from both, the US INC. based in City of London. It´s all a dog and pony show for the blinded mass sheeple who choose their own slaughter in both cases.

  6. ManCavePatriot  January 5, 2017 at 3:39 pm

    It must take a tremendous amount of kids blood to keep Heinz on this side of the earth.

  7. davor  January 5, 2017 at 2:22 pm

    Don’t think that Trump is going to fight Iran but who knows. Boeing however needs to sell hundreds of planes for Iranian civil fleet and this is a big deal for US interests. There are also numerous projects to be working on. But Trump might get impeached for whatever lunacy during his term, and then someone even more unstable might be put in office. Trump mocked Bush tribe for aiding and allowing 9/11 which was well under way during the first days of Georgie’s presidency, it surely took Mossad months of preparations. Maybe some similar preparations are now again under way. Trump could probably be debriefed about it among the latest.

  8. Andrew_Bukanov(Russia)  January 5, 2017 at 11:16 am

    Don’t even wanna comment this. I’m fed up with this shameful accusation. Kids in Russian kindergarten are smarter than NWO and current US Obama’s admins.

  9. yamgourchi  January 5, 2017 at 11:08 am

    Seems to be reasonable.H.Kissinger has always been Trojan horse in diplomacy.And his duality in political asessments is amazing.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network