Madonna contemplates “blowing up the White House”

There is no such thing as “diversity.” Madonna talks about choosing “love” instead of “hate,” but she can never love her enemy because this is not part of her ideology.

Who are you working for, Ms. Material Girl?

…by Jonas E. Alexis

 

One can historically say that the current presidential inauguration has been somewhat unique. It has indeed generated violent reactions in Washington and elsewhere. Madonna has recently come out of the woodwork and declared: “I’m angry. Yes, I am outraged. Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House.”

Obviously some psychopaths were listening to Madonna’s potent message. They smashed windows and vandalized cars.[1] It has been reported that at least 217 people have been arrested, and areas of downtown Washington has been damaged. Long before the debacle, Michael Moore was already calling for “disruption” during the inauguration.[2]

Is this how you treat your presumed enemy? Does it really help to go out on the streets and act like wild animals? Nonviolent protest is of course legitimate, but smashing cars and windows?

As we have argued in the past, Trump is indeed inconsistent when it comes to Israel. In fact, Trump hasn’t really fleshed out a consistent foreign policy.

But violent protesters are doing a disservice to all Americans and to their own cause by appealing to vandalism to get things done. They seem to forget that the entire world is watching them.

This also shows that there is no such thing as “diversity.” Madonna talks about choosing “love” instead of “hate,” but she can never love her enemy because this is not part of her ideology.

Then it was Scarlett Johansson’s turn to jump on the political bandwagon. “‘Have you been to the gynecologist yet?’ That was the question my mom asked me at 15 when I informed her about a change that I noticed in my body,” Johansson declared.

“I’m not the type to divulge facts about my personal life, but I feel that in the face of this current political climate, it is vital that we all make it our mission to get really, really personal. So, yes, at 15, I had been to a gynecologist.”

She didn’t stop there:

“I was living in New York City and had visited a Planned Parenthood there. It was actually my clinician at Planned Parenthood who suggested I speak with my pediatrician if I was seeking a referral. She was compassionate and professional and told me she was happy to treat me for regular checkups, and when the time came, for STD and cancer screenings. No judgment. No questions asked. Planned Parenthood provided a safe place where I could be treated with gentle guidance.”

Scarlett Johansson

In other words, she had an abortion. But let us start and think about this for a moment. If Johansson’s mother took the same route, would she be able to make those statements today? That perennial puzzle has never been answered in a logical manner because the ideological foundation of the abortion issue is morally and intellectually bankrupt.

What people like Johannsson don’t usually understand is that Planned Parenthood was created by Margaret Sanger specifically to depopulate the earth, most specifically by eliminating the “imbeciles,” namely, blacks and Catholics.

It must also bes said that abortion is a sanitized version of eugenics, an ideology which started by a sizable number of British intellectuals and which quickly got spread like a virus in America with serious political consequences.[3]

Margaret Sanger made it very clear in her book Pivot of Civilization that “the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective [and that] possibly drastic and Spartan methods may be forced upon American society if it continues complacently to encourage the chance and chaotic breeding that has resulted from our stupid, cruel sentimentalism.”[4] Sanger again declared:

“The mass of Negroes, particularly in the South, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes, even more than among whites, is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit, and least able to rear children properly.”[5]

Where is Black Lives Matter when you really need them? Where are puppets and racketeers like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson?

Sanger was heavily influenced by Social Darwinism. She took that ideology and spread it through Planned Parenthood and her sterilization program. Throughout much of her life, Sanger sought to find a black minister who would understand the sterilization process. She wrote,

“What I wish to see is the employment of an up and doing modern minister, colored, and up and doing modern colored medical man, both to come to New York and train at the Clinic [her clinic] and at the [International Planned Parenthood] Federation until they are oozing with birth control as well as population.”[6]

This black minister would spread her ideology “as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach.”[7] Sanger got what she was looking for in 1929 when a black social worker by the name of James H. Hubert, executive secretary of New York’s Urban League, answered Sanger’s call. Historian Cathy Moran Hajo writes,

“Opened in February 1930 with the backing of Harlem’s elite, the branch clinic had its own fifteen-member advisory board of African American doctors, clergymen, nurses, journalists, and social workers who advised and promoted the clinic.

“The clinic was publicized in the African American press, in the pulpits of some of Harlem’s most respected churches, and through medical channels.

“Sanger funded the clinic through grants from the Chicago-based Julius Rosenwald Fund and the donations of other white donors.

“The Harlem Branch treated 1,737 patients in its first year, about half of them African Americans. Sanger continued funding the branch, asking its advisory council to focus on ways of increasing black attendance.”[8]

Central to Sanger’s entire weltanschauung is the elimination of the moral order. She wrote again:

“Slowly but surely we are breaking down the taboos that surround sex; but we are breaking them down out of sheer necessity. The codes that have surrounded sexual behavior in the so-called Christian communities, the teachings of the churches concerning chastity and sexual purity, the prohibitions of the laws, and the hypocritical conventions of society, have all demonstrated their failure as safeguards against the chaos produced and the havoc wrought by the failure to recognize sex as a driving force in human nature—as great as, if indeed not greater than, hunger.”[9]

Since this was the case, then it was ideologically permissible for Sanger to get involved in multiple sexual relationships with a wide-range of people, including Havelock Ellis, Lorenzo Portet, Jonah Goldstein, Hugh de Selincourt, J. Noah Slee, H. G. Wells, Herbert Simonds, Harold Child, Angus MacDonald, Hobson Pitman, etc.

But that is not the end. Biographer Madeline Gray writes that “Margaret was seeking poise and surcease from her recurrent depression through astrology, numerology, sex, religious cults, and friends. No wonder, despite all the talk of her twinkling laughter, most of the pictures of her taken after 1925 reveal her as sad.”[10]

Sanger stated:

“We must teach men the overwhelming power of this radiant force…Through sex, mankind may attain the great spiritual illumination which will transform the world, which will light up the only path to an earthly paradise. So must we necessarily and inevitably conceive of sex-expression?”[11]

Aleister Crowley died too soon. He almost certainly would have been pleased to honor Sanger for her work. About children, Sanger wrote: “The most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is to kill it.”[12]

Once again, Sanger would not have been able to make such a bold statement if her own mother applied the same formula. Was it good or bad that she didn’t? If the answer is that it was good that her mother decided to nurture her, then didn’t Sanger give other babies a chance to live?

Sanger applied essentially Darwinian principles to get her dirty work done, but the laughable thing is that Darwin’s intellectual children are now complaining that they need more babies for the next generation. One needn’t be an intellectual to see that this is really dumb.


[1] “Anti-Trump Protesters Smash Windows, Vandalize Cars On Streets of Washington,” Sputnik News, January 20, 2017.

[2] “Michael Moore Calls for ‘Disruption’ of Trump’s Inauguration,” Sputnik News, December 9, 216.

[3]  See for example Daniel J. Kevles, In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998); Mark B. Adams, eds., The Wellborn Science: Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil and Russia (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990); Gunnar Broberg and Nils Roll-Hansen, eds., Eugenics and the Welfare State: Sterilization Policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1996); Frank Dikotter, Imperfect Conceptions: Medical Knowledge, Birth Defects, and Eugenics in China (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998); Edward J. Larson, Sex, Race, and Science: Eugenics in the Deep South (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995).

[4] Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization (New York: Humanity Books, 2003), 64.

[5] Angela Franks, Margaret Sanger’s Eugenic Legacy: The Control of Female Fertility (Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 2005),, 266.

[6] Ibid., 44.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Cathy Moran Hajo, Birth Control on Main Street: Organizing Clinics in the United States, 1916-1939 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2010), 85.

[9] Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, 246, 271.

[10] Grey, Margaret Sanger, 249.

[11] Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, 246, 271.

[12] George Grant, Killer Angel: A Short Biography of Planned Parenthood’s Founder Margaret Sanger (Nashville: Cumberland House Publishing, 2001), 115.

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on January 21, 2017, With 3166 Reads Filed under History, Life, World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

28 Responses to "Madonna contemplates “blowing up the White House”"

  1. jensingr  January 23, 2017 at 4:34 pm

    and we all know “gaga” swears to lucifer..

  2. jensingr  January 23, 2017 at 4:27 pm

    yes, the fact that she had sex with key people who elevated her non-talent to the top is secondary to the fact that she sold her soul to satan. Her videos and lyrics don’t hide the fact who she has to give her bidding to in order to stay in the “business”. and now she is so starved for attention she wants to blow up the white house!

  3. Andrew_Bukanov(Russia)  January 23, 2017 at 2:53 pm

    Old babushka Madonna promised bj for Clinton voters. She is insane :)))))))) Gerontofilia is maniac feeling.
    Shame and Sin!

    • jensingr  January 23, 2017 at 4:06 pm

      “old babushka” yep, that’s what I will start calling her!
      Hilarious Andrew..!!!.^-^

  4. US-First  January 23, 2017 at 7:01 am

    jensingr:

    I think ‘sleep’ is a misnomer unless one was satanic or moderately depraved and diseased of mind.

    She schtoops to conquer is the Yiddish version of Goldsmith’s classic – She Stoops to Conquer without the implied perversion of sleeping with a ghoul. It might wear red string garters and it wouldn’t change a thing. Her entire persona is bound up in so much satanic filth even a mention of her name is repulsive to make a sane man gag. Hence gaga. I’ll stop in case someone tells me I’m too down on her; and that wouldn’t do.

  5. jensingr  January 22, 2017 at 11:27 pm

    She slept her way to the top and freely admits it.

  6. jensingr  January 22, 2017 at 10:40 pm

    I couldn’t get past the hat shaped liked 2 horns on Madonna’s head..

    but she’s a blatant satanist/illuminati skank.

    • jensingr  January 22, 2017 at 11:00 pm

      I have never heard of Sanger so thanks for the info. on that dark person,
      and the real beginnings of planned parenthood, but now I feel nauseated.

    • Trakkath  January 23, 2017 at 6:01 am

      We haven´t heard about a lot of criminals and murderers until the new Gutenberg press came into the world. Now all seems to pop up and correct historical lies and apocalypse all the criminals which is a cataclsym for them

    • jensingr  January 23, 2017 at 4:13 pm

      Yes, Trakkath, every day we turn a new page together as we uncover
      and expose the filth of these corrupt evil beings, which will definitely be their downfall!

  7. Martin Maloney  January 22, 2017 at 5:32 pm

    Madonna clarifies her “blow up the White House” speech — says that she was speaking in metaphor:

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/music/celebrity/madonna-clarifies-her-anti-trump-speech-from-the-women%e2%80%99s-march-%e2%80%98i-spoke-in-metaphor%e2%80%99/ar-AAm7sUM?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=iehp

  8. JL  January 22, 2017 at 4:29 pm

    BS protest I might say. Too much lies and hypocricy and too little anarchy. Let the french farmers show You the way. Here’s the milk protest:

    “https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgDimvKtB90”

    Notice the Holy Cow. It is the Holy as it turns plain grass to the future of mankind. And when it has done it, the leftovers come out. French farmers decided to express that too. We don’t have the land to spread it anymore, so You can keep it too. The shit protest:

    “https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXa_B3Hl38I”

  9. not atall  January 22, 2017 at 2:21 pm

    what is new, all she is good at is bj

  10. Martin Maloney  January 22, 2017 at 12:52 pm

    Did you hear that Madonna burned her lips, trying to blow up the presidential limousine?

  11. joetv  January 22, 2017 at 11:42 am

    The WH must get in line, right behind the Clinton voters, who patiently wait for the promised blow job from the woman, singer turned cartoon character, previously known as Madonna.

  12. Peter Johnson  January 22, 2017 at 11:34 am

    She could blow up the White House — She’s got the lips for it, and probably knows a thing or two Monica could only dream of. Monica’s humidor impersonation will take some beating though.

  13. StanDelCarloDC  January 22, 2017 at 9:24 am

    O boogeyman, O boogeyman, wherefore art thou big bad ass boogeyman?

    http://www.thelema.org/aa/documents/the_book_of_the_law/index.html

  14. US-First  January 22, 2017 at 8:02 am

    Striving for hell. Life according to the Talmud.

    • jensingr  January 22, 2017 at 11:20 pm

      Madonna practices Kabbalah and wears the red string bracelet.

  15. medicis  January 22, 2017 at 6:52 am

    Thank you Jonas for being among the rational and perceptive writers at VT. I knew most of the story…. but you provided additional information I was either unaware of…. or had forgotten. You are quite remarkable.

  16. Trakkath  January 22, 2017 at 3:22 am

    You can see it in every advertising message that artists are the best sellers for every crap, put a beautiful woman on a crap that can kill you and men fall down on their knees to beg for it. On the other side the same with man as advertiser to women. Seems to be the hormonal cap sliding over the brain and blind us all.

  17. wjabbe  January 22, 2017 at 2:12 am

    What is especially annoying about the current ME ME ME generation is how some selfish people who have sexually transmitted diseases run around and deliberately infect others without even warning them. And what about ignorant women, where the evidence is absolutely clear now, that smoking, drinking alcohol and using drugs while pregnant, impairs the intelligence and possibly other physical and genetic traits of the fetus? Since when it is the “right” of an ignorant and irresponsible female to wreck the life of an unborn child while society at large must pick up the pieces? What about the cost to society from this selfish ignorant behavior? I do think the police power of government is justified to prevent this gross misconduct to unborn children. VD and other sexually transmitted diseases are at all time highs costing society in many ways beyond money and over use of anti biotics and more. Perhaps Madonna has been having too much unprotected sex with the Hollywood Perverts as she appears to be behaving like a crazy person. Perhaps she has advanced VD.

    • wjabbe  January 22, 2017 at 2:28 am

      Every kid from about 7th grade should be required to view the well known films showing the graphic images of the various stages of venereal diseases leading to horrible human suffering ending up with genitals literally falling off the body, blindness and a horrible death all costs to be paid by society at large in most cases. At one time most members of the military were shown these films. I have no idea if they still require their members to view them but they should. A picture is worth a thousand words. Anyone who has viewed these graphic films will never forget them.

    • Martin Maloney  January 22, 2017 at 12:49 pm

      About 50 years ago, when I was in the Air Force, everyone was required to attend a presentation (with slides) about (what was then called) “VD.”

      Someone asked, “What can happen if you get VD too many times?” What he meant was, “What can the Air Force do to someone who keeps getting VD?”

      The person who was doing the presentation took it that way, and he replied, “Well, I suppose that you could get a discharge.”

      I immediately burst out laughing, a second person caught the unintentional pun, and then the entire audience erupted in laughter.

      There being absolutely no possibility of any further serious discussion, we were immediately dismissed.

  18. Andrew_Bukanov(Russia)  January 22, 2017 at 2:09 am

    Many Russian actors and singers who dared to comment political weather in Ukrainian conflict – just lost their reputation and fans respect. People of Art should keep away from politics. Political dirt is sticky and if you step into this dirt, you’ll never wash it away.

  19. ethanallen  January 22, 2017 at 1:08 am

    Social Darwinism is an established and readily observable fact though perhaps not exactly as its traditional supporters predicted. Those whom nature or nurture has blessed with superior adaptive characteristics will tend to rise to the top. History is replete with demonstration that the most vicious, the most duplicitous, the most ruthless, the most unprincipled will in the long run tend to prevail over those inferior humans who are burdened with a conscience. That is the real and existing Social Darwinism and that is why we have so many low people in high places.

  20. Garry Compton  January 22, 2017 at 12:16 am

    Is it just me or has America been fighting over this abortion, women’s right stuff since I was a kid – and I’m old now. I don’t hear the ” girls” sticking up for all the women and children dead in the ME or East Ukraine. Because in America it’s always about ME ME ME. Women in America have it made compared to most of the World. Oh ya – that photo in your article that says ‘No Fascism” – some one needs tell the Americans that their UN had a vote on whether to outlaw Fascist and Nazi Governments and the vote was 130 for outlawing it and 2 for keepin it legal – America and Ukraine voted – FOR fascism. Trump wasn’t President – LOL

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network