Moscow demands OPCW explain how White Helmets emerged unharmed in Syrian sarin attack

The Russian Defense Ministry says no representatives of the OPCW visited Syria’s Khan Shaykun, so the origin of samples the organizarion claims to have is unclear

Editor’s note:  This article was “erased” by hackers when it was posted on VT 48 hours ago.

 

MOSCOW, TASS/. No representatives of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) visited Syria’s Khan Shaykhun where an alleged chemical attack took place, so the origin of samples the OPCW claims to have is unclear, said Russian Defense Ministry Spokesman Major General Igor Konashenkov.

OPCW Director General Ahmet Uzumcu said earlier that sarin gas or a sarin-like substance had been used in the chemical weapons attack in Khan Shaykhun. He added that “the analytical results already obtained are incontrovertible.”

According to Konashenkov, “in the past two weeks, not a single OPCW representative was seen there.” “Where do these samples come from? Who of the OPCW members was able to study them so fast while standard procedures stipulate a complex research which requires time, as we can see in the case of mustard gas use in Aleppo,” Konashenkov said.

White Helmets unharmed

The Russian Defense Ministry wants the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to explain how members of the White Helmets (an organization positioning itself as a human rights campaigner – TASS) managed to stay unharmed by sarin in Khan Shaykhun, Defense Ministry spokesman said.

“If it is true that sarin was used in Khan Shaykhun, how can the OPCW then account for the fact the charlatans from the White Helmets organization were hustling and bustling inside sarin clouds with no protective gear on? Everybody could see that. Ahmed Uzumcu should provide comprehensible answers to these questions as soon as possible,” Konashenkov said.

“Although independent experts do not believe that anyone could have remained unharmed in a sarin gas attack, nevertheless, maybe Mr. Uzumcu has created his own periodic table of elements instead of Mendeleev’s one?” Konashenkov added.

OPCW’s responsibility

The Russian defense ministry spokesman pointed out that the OPCW had been founded as an impartial and responsible international organization. “This is why the statements and conclusions that this organization makes should be based on scientific methods instead of being politically motivated,” the Russian general said.

“Moreover, any experts should have an opportunity to check these statements and conclusions,” Konashenkov added.

He said that only an impartial investigation on the scene could help figure out what had really happened in Khan Khaykhun as well as “establish those responsible.”

Aleppo mustard gas attack

The Russian defense ministry spokesman went on to say that the OPCW had been unable to provide an opinion on the use of mustard gas in Aleppo for four months while it took the organization very little time to come to a conclusion on the Khan Shaykhun incident.

“Four months later, the OPCW is still unable to deliver an opinion and recognize that the mustard gas found in Aleppo was really mustard gas, citing the need for additional research. However, as for Khan Shaykhun, everything become clear immediately to Mr. Uzumcu,” Konashenkov said.

He pointed out that in late 2016, Russian experts recorded a mustard gas attack carried out by militants in Aleppo. “Russian experts went to the scene and collected samples of the poisonous substance, which were later handed over to the OPCW. At the time, the Syrian authorities insisted the OPCW experts should visit the country and expressed readiness to ensure their security but no one came,” the Russian General noted.

Khan Khaykhun attack

The alleged chemical weapons incident in the town of Khan Shaykhun, the Idlib Governorate, occurred on April 4. According to the Russian Defense Ministry, on that day the Syrian air force delivered airstrikes on several militant facilities where munitions filled with poisonous substances were being made. However, Washington came to the conclusion that Damascus had used chemical weapons which led the US to carry out a missile attack on the Syrian military’s Shayrat air base located in the Homs Governorate on April 7, as the US believes that the attack on Khan Shaykhun was launched from there.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts


The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on April 22, 2017, With 6177 Reads Filed under Russia. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

9 Responses to "Moscow demands OPCW explain how White Helmets emerged unharmed in Syrian sarin attack"

  1. mijj  April 24, 2017 at 11:03 am

    presumably, the White Helmets were protected from contamination by the supposed chemical weapons by the Power of Righteousness

    /s

  2. joetv  April 23, 2017 at 5:53 pm

    The exhaled breaths of Halley, Lindsey Graham, Trump, Tillerson, McStain, and Pence were forced into the lungs of the OPCW. It is a well financed collective political gas attack. The OPCW will never respond to logical questions for fear of being accused of antisemitism by non-semites.

  3. Wulver  April 23, 2017 at 5:14 am

    I think Moscow ought to just settle down a bit and give President Kushner a chance to weigh in on the issue.

  4. kaho  April 22, 2017 at 10:42 pm

    Who was it that said «The Emperor has no clothes»?
    Today we might say «The White Helmets have no clothes»

    http://aktiveeventyr.dk/onewebstatic/76db313843-kejserens-nye-klæder-1.jpg

    • kaho  April 22, 2017 at 10:48 pm

      Or rather «The White Helmets have no gloves»

  5. Dr. Abu-Bakr Susta  April 22, 2017 at 4:30 pm

    Trump & Co. want NO independent OPCW investigation (i.e., what Syria, Russia & others have asked). “Don’t confuse me with the facts & evidence; I’ve already made up my mind,” said Trump.

    MSM and almost all in Congress have already concluded that “Assad did it.” So, why should OPCW investigate independently?

    But G7 foreign ministers recently meeting in Italy REFUSED to take action against Syria & Russia without an investigation & proof. In Italy, no one had handed a script to the G7 FMs. An oversight — Damn! ;-).

    • kaho  April 22, 2017 at 10:22 pm

      Okay, G7 = UK, the US, Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan. What you are talking about must be the G7 meeting in Lucca, Toscana. I found reports about Boris Johnson seeking a G7 agreement for further sanctions on Russia :
      «Tuesday 11 April 2017, First published on Monday 10 April 2017
      Vladimir Putin is “toxifying the image of Russia” by backing Bashar al-Assad and the G7 must consider fresh sanctions against Russia and Syria in response to last week’s chemical attack on civilians, Boris Johnson has said.» (Guardian)
      But Telegraph (April 11) writes :
      «Rather than threatening Vladimir Putin with asset-freezing, the Germans preferred a policy of “reaching out to Russia” while Italy’s foreign minister said it was vital not to “push Russia into a corner”.»

      I can, however, not find any statement saying that the REASON for the G7 non-acceptance of Johnson’s proposal was lack of evidence for Syrian guilt relating to the gas attack.

    • kaho  April 22, 2017 at 10:30 pm

      BTW I saw a note saying that Boris’ grandfather was a Turkish immigrant. Sometimes one may wonder if ethnic sympathies (or antipathies) may not linger a generation or two.

  6. Trakkath  April 22, 2017 at 2:38 pm

    You know that the White Helmets are Superheroes like Superman which can harm nothing, because they got the Nobel-Peace Prize. Must I say “sarcasm in/out” ?

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network