Awarding Saudi Arabia chair on Women’s Rights Commission makes UN complicit in crimes

Awarding Saudi Arabia chair on Women's Rights Commission makes UN complicit in crimes

 

Ms. Marwa Osman. PhD Candidate located in Beirut, Lebanon. University Lecturer at the Lebanese International University and Maaref University.

Russia Today: The Saudi Arabia that publicly beheads women and dangles bodies from cranes was just elected to the UN Women’s Rights Commission. This is not the punchline of a twisted joke, but the intergovernmental UN shaming itself.

After the scandal of re-electing Saudi Arabia to the UN Human Rights Council in 2016, that same Saudi Arabia which has been indiscriminately bombing Yemeni civilians for more than two years, now gets ‘elected’ to the new position of Women’s Rights Commission for 2018-2022 term by the United Nations’ premier human rights body.

The first thing that crossed my mind when I read this news was the scene of women getting decapitated on the streets of Riyadh, the place where brutal executions are so frequent that one large public space is nicknamed ‘Chop Chop Square’ due to the sheer number of state-sanctioned killings there.

If you are having a hard time fathoming these facts simply watch ITV’s shocking documentary, which reveals the horrors of daily life inside Saudi Arabia. Titled ‘Saudi Arabia Uncovered,’ the film aims to expose the brutal punishments dished out to those deemed to have broken the country’s strict Islamic laws. At one point, a woman accused of killing her stepdaughter is heard screaming “I didn’t do it” before she is beheaded in the street. Another clip shows five corpses strung up from a crane.

Saudi Arabia’s human rights record has been called into question numerous times before, especially last year after 47 people – including prominent Shia cleric Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr – were executed in a single day.

Sheikh Nimr was a vocal supporter of the mass anti-government protests that flared up in the kingdom’s oil-rich Eastern Province in 2011, where a Shia majority have long complained of marginalization.

Despite making extensive use of the death penalty and carrying out dozens of public executions, the ‘rich’ country remains a member of the United Nations Human Rights Council and now also an advocate (!) for women’s rights.

I could write extensively about the women right’s violations and the human rights abuses by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, or about the agencies that are helping to whitewash these human rights violations, but I would rather link you to an Independent article, which lists ten examples of human rights abuses by Saudi Arabia and another exposé about a PR firm accused of helping Saudi Arabia ‘whitewash’ its human rights record by deleting reference to its client after multiple challenges from a human rights group.

What I would really like to consider is the question: What on Earth is going on at the UN? Is the global body aware the country they keep awarding new positions to actually has NO Constitution?! Let us begin by looking at its Basic Law in which the government in the kingdom bases its legitimacy on its interpretation of sharia (Islamic Law) and the 1992 Basic Law, which specifies the rulers of the country shall be male descendants of the founder, King Abdulaziz bin Abdulrahman al-Saud.

Let me state that again…“Male” descendants. It all starts there.The most important human rights problems reported by the Human Rights Watch (HRW) in its 2017 report included the lack of ability and legal means for citizens to choose their government; restrictions on universal rights, such as freedom of expression, including on the internet, and the freedoms of assembly, association, movement, and religion; and pervasive gender discrimination and lack of equal rights that affected all aspects of women’s lives.

In the words of the (HRW): “Saudi Arabia’s discriminatory male guardianship system remains intact despite government pledges to abolish it. Under this system, adult women must obtain permission from a male guardian—usually a husband, father, brother, or son—to travel, marry, or exit prison. They may be required to provide guardian consent in order to work or access healthcare. Women regularly face difficulty conducting a range of transactions without a male relative, from renting an apartment to filing legal claims. All women remain banned from driving cars in Saudi Arabia.”

Did the UN read this paragraph? I will answer that for you. Yes, they did, and they simply ignored it. Just as they did when the UN reprehensibly backed down on its condemnation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia after it threatened in June 2016 to break relations with the United Nations and cut hundreds of millions of dollars in assistance for humanitarian relief and counter-terrorism programs to strong-arm the UN. All of that to push the UN into removing Riyadh and its allies from a blacklist of groups that are accused of harming Yemeni children in armed conflict. That happened as the Saud-led coalition’s naval blockade of Yemen’s ports drastically limited the supply of food and medicine, leaving over 80 percent of the population in need of some form of humanitarian assistance. It becomes even more disgraceful when these facts are listed by the United Nations’ own Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and International Sanctions, Idriss Jazairy, who said the plight of people in the country is becoming increasingly desperate.

Eleven years since it was first created the UN Human Rights Council has gone beyond the point of facing a stark moment of truth to where it is now confronted with a shocking scandal.

The credibility of the world’s top human rights body, which was set up to ensure it is able to effectively address human rights violations without being undermined by geopolitics and competing national interests, is now being brought into question because of the dreadful track record of one of its members, Saudi Arabia, and the failure of other members to call it to account. Rather than putting an end to the hypocrisy of Saudi Arabia at the Human Rights Council, the UN keeps giving more human rights positions to the kingdom on a silver plate.

If the UN feels somehow compelled to turn a blind eye to the human rights violations committed by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia before it joined the UN, then the least it could do is track KSA’s horrendous record since it joined the UN Human Rights Council in January 2014. Since then the kingdom has carried out gross and systematic human rights violations both at home and in neighboring Yemen.

We are currently at a time when the United Nations is assuming a posture of complete complicity with Saudi Arabia’s inhuman tyrannical war crimes, human rights violations, suffering, slavery and religious persecution. The UN is now literally Saudi Arabia’s cynical cover-up body that helps it get away with and conceal its gross and systematic violations by offering it to chair both the UN Human Rights Council and the Women’s Rights Commission.

The UN as a top human rights body has been sucked into the abyss of money and power, and there is no sign of a return to a rational and fair position in the near future.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on April 26, 2017, With 1038 Reads Filed under Investigations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

6 Responses to "Awarding Saudi Arabia chair on Women’s Rights Commission makes UN complicit in crimes"

  1. Andrew_Bukanov(Russia)  April 28, 2017 at 5:54 am

    Saudy Arabia needs a “spring”

  2. Monty!  April 26, 2017 at 6:53 pm

    The UNO is nothing but a cover for hegemonic powers to keep a hold on global affairs in their own interests. China was reluctant after WWII to join and the UNSC Veto Power status cajoled it to join. The lesser powers (after the costs of WWII) of France and Britain had joined in self-interests to keep their self-importance alive with American interests at it’s peak.

    I’ve always wondered as to how France managed to side-step reality of global affairs and be given a Veto status having just been occupied, weak and penniless. Funny how the world works.

    Russia and USA were the dominant powers. Hence, their Veto status is understandable.

    The question is hypothetical- (Just Asking,,,)
    What if a country decides to come out of UNO altogether (it can’t, as there is no mechanism) and decides to go it alone?? What loss would it have?? (apart from American wrath,,, and even bombing it’s capital city for the temerity of it)
    .

  3. ayelyahbenjamin  April 26, 2017 at 5:36 pm

    a most obvious taunt…Let them think they have it all, the secret back-end of the UN have grossly underestimated the hearts of true men the world over…the UN is being abandoned for the true and real representation of the people…. all nations already seen, already moving united they stand aside as the new moves through…and true peace will be tasted for the first time for all

  4. M.O.A.Bitches  April 26, 2017 at 2:10 pm

    Hmmmmnm . . . and silly me, here I am thinking that the U.S. of A. is all afraid of this seeping in to our culture.

    UN-Human Rights is correct. They aren’t lying about that. Saudi Arabia is the most back asswards nation on this entire prison we call home. When I was in Morocco I watched soccer games at the local cafe. One day, there was a match between Morocco and Saudi, and it was on their home court. The camera panned the audience, and all I saw . . . men. Not a little kid, boy or girl . . . not one female in the crowd. They could not attend. “No soccer for you!” Not given “permission.” Only the men can go to the soccer games?!?!? This was in 2005. Perhaps they are “permitted” I bet they are!

    • M.O.A.Bitches  April 26, 2017 at 2:17 pm

      The UN does realize that Saudi Arabia is . . . wait for it . . . wait for it . . . wahhabi?

      “For more than two centuries, Wahhabism has been Saudi Arabia’s dominant faith. It is an austere form of Islam that insists on a literal interpretation of the Koran. Strict Wahhabis believe that all those who don’t practice their form of Islam are heathens and enemies.”

  5. wjabbe  April 26, 2017 at 9:37 am

    The UN is an insane asylum plain and simple. The U.S. is totally insane and mentally impaired for associating with any country engaged in such atrocities. That the U.S. associates and provides aid and equipment to this despicable piece of garbage is a shameful disgrace. Abolish the worthless United Nations ASAP. It is just as worthless as the former League of Nations. Let these worthless nations on earth destroy themselves and earth and everything on it so the more intelligent animal population can live in peace.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network