Vladimir Putin Speaks

Putin: “In Iraq, after Saddam Hussein was toppled, the state’s institutions, including the army, were left in ruins. We said back then, be very, very careful."

“Why can’t we have honest dialogue?”

…by  Jonas E. Alexis

 

One of the charges that has been leveled against Putin over the past few years is that he is a dictator.[1] That indeed is an extraordinary charge which obviously demands extraordinary evidence and intellectual honesty.

Since the Western mind dictates that ideas should be proved or disproved by reason, logic and rigorous testing, then New World Order agents should not be upset when they are asked to provide rigorous evidence for this claim. But these people seem to think that repeating a statement over and over in the media is actually a substitute serious evidence.

Putin would love to sit down with these people and interact with them. And he always welcomes questions and serious dialogue. In his October 2014 speech, Putin again put the equation on the lap of his listeners by saying:

We will have a free discussion afterwards and I will be happy to answer your questions and would also like to use my right to ask you questions. And during the upcoming discussion let someone try to disprove the argument that I just set out.”

Obviously Putin was implicitly going back to practical reason, where arguments and counter-arguments presented, refuted, and defended. Did New World Order agents take the time to understand what Putin was saying? Well, none of them could logically and contextually refute any of the points he raised throughout his speech.

In fact, it got so bad that Putin had to ask BBC journalist John Simpson, “Have you any common sense”? This was a response to Simpson’s comment that Russia is an aggressor. Putin literally decimated the poor guy with one fact after another, and NWO agents probably realized after that event that they should never get into a “fact competition” with Putin.

In his speech, Putin argued that whenever New World Order agents “need to justify illegal intervention” to topple “inconvenient regimes,” they use all kinds of illegal activities under the flavor of “democracy” and “freedom” and “blackmail” any leader who disagrees with them. He added:

“It is not for nothing that ‘big brother’ is spending billions of dollars on keeping the whole world, including its own closest allies, under surveillance.”

What again has this New world Order ideology produced?

“Instead of settling conflicts it leads to their escalation, instead of sovereign and stable states we see the growing spread of chaos, and instead of democracy there is support for a very dubious public ranging from open neo-fascists to Islamic radicals.

“Why do they support such people? They do this because they decide to use them as instruments along the way in achieving their goals but then burn their fingers and recoil. I never cease to be amazed by the way that our partners just keep stepping on the same rake, as we say here in Russia, that is to say, make the same mistake over and over.”

In other words, NWO agents think that the world isn’t watching what they are doing. They deliberately delude themselves into thinking that they are acting rationally, when in fact their evil work has been exposed over and over. “Double standards,” Putin argued, is not and never has been the way to move forward.

“Our partners expressed agreement, but a little time passed and we ended up back where we started. First there was the military operation in Iraq, then in Libya, which got pushed to the brink of falling apart. Why was Libya pushed into this situation? Today it is a country in danger of breaking apart and has become a training ground for terrorists.”

After exposing the so-called Syrian rebels as a terrorist cell, after linking them with other terrorists such as ISIS, Putin added:

“In Iraq, after Saddam Hussein was toppled, the state’s institutions, including the army, were left in ruins. We said back then, be very, very careful. You are driving people out into the street, and what will they do there?

“What was the result? Tens of thousands of soldiers, officers and former Baath Party activists were turned out into the streets and today have joined the rebels’ ranks. Perhaps this is what explains why the Islamic State group has turned out so effective?

“Russia warned repeatedly about the dangers of unilateral military actions, intervening in sovereign states’ affairs, and flirting with extremists and radicals. We insisted on having the groups fighting the central Syrian government, above all the Islamic State, included on the lists of terrorist organizations. But did we see any results? We appealed in vain.”

Putin pulled the New World Order cat out of the bag by saying: “This kind of unstable construction has shown its inability to fight the real threats such as regional conflicts, terrorism, drug trafficking, religious fanaticism, chauvinism and neo-Nazism. At the same time, it has opened the road wide for inflated national pride, manipulating public opinion and letting the strong bully and suppress the weak.”

If Putin’s speech was not an attack on the New World Order and its diabolical agenda in the political sphere, then nothing is. The entire speech, which is 41 pages, can be extracted online and is filled with devastating statements against what I would call the Neo-Bolshevik ideology in the Middle East. New World Order agents, Putin said, are “increasingly divorced from reality and are in contradiction with the world’s diversity.”

NWO agents, as we have relentlessly argued in the past, have no respect for law, practical reason, and ultimately the truth. In that sense, they are essentially satanic. Some writers have indirectly or unintentionally pointed this out.

For example, Christopher A. Preble has lamented that the United States has a long tradition of “engaging in subterfuge, misdirection and/or outright deception” in the political realm.[2] And this goes back to World War II: “During World War II…President Roosevelt referred to Joseph Stalin as gentle ‘Uncle Joe’ to polish the Soviet leader’s public persona in the United States.”[3]

Keep in mind that Roosevelt was polishing a man who had previously slaughtered at least ten million people within less than ten years! By 1937, Stalin had already starved and executed as many as ten million peasants.[4]

This period in history—from 1929-1937—is known as the Red Holocaust.[5] By 1938, a total of 9.7 million perished, and from 1939 until 1953, another 9 million lost their lives.[6] From 1937-1939, Stalin executed 50,000 clergymen alone.[7]

Stalin’s terrorism began as early as 1918, when “he ordered the execution of all suspected counter-revolutionaries. Stalin burned villages in the countryside to intimidate the peasants and discourage bandit raids on food supplies a decade before he became Red tsar.”[8] Lenin himself said that the Soviet government was built “directly on force, not limited by anything, not restricted by any laws, nor any absolute rules.”[9]

Even after World War II, Stalin did not stop terrorizing the peasants.[10] Minority groups such as the Greeks, Germans, Turks, Orthodox Christians, Lithuanians, and Vlasovites also fell prey to Stalin’s ethnic cleansing.[11]

So, it was morally irresponsible for Roosevelt to align with Stalin. But as the saying goes, those who do not know their history are condemned to repeat it. The United States is still allying with terrorist regimes like Saudi Arabia, Turkey and of course Israel. The United States is still supporting terrorist cells such as ISIS, the so-called Syrian rebels, and al-Nusra. As we have seen in the past, Turkey is in bed with ISIS,[12] and ISIS has been known to literally bury “alive dozens of defectors who fled Iraq battlefield.”[13]

How can New World Order agents say that they are fighting terrorism while supporting terrorism at the same time and in the same respect? How can they not see that they are living in contradiction? And how can they expect the entire world to take them seriously?

Again, the New World Order is simply irrational and virtually every sensible and decent leader has a problem with it. The New World Order cannot live without double standards, and its agents use the United States for ideological purposes virtually everywhere on the planet. As Preble again puts it, “More often, though, U.S. partnerships with questionable characters harm America’s moral standing while doing little (if anything) to improve U.S. security.”[14]

This is one reason why Putin couldn’t get anywhere with New World Order agents. And he still doesn’t understand why these people cannot play by the rule.


[1] See for example Paul Roderick Gregory , “Putin Declares Himself Dictator With The Navalny Verdict,” Forbes, July 18, 2013; Laura Koran, Kevin Liptak and Elise Labott, “Joe Biden ups ante by calling Vladimir Putin a ‘dictator,’” CNN, July 29, 2016; “’Putin Needs Wars To Legitimize His Position,’” Spiegel, November 10, 2015.

[2] Christopher A. Preble, “Why Cover for Saudi Arabia?,” National Interest, April 22, 2016.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Steven Rosefielde, Red Holocaust (New York: Routledge, 2010), 40.

[5] Ibid., 50.

[6] Ibid., 20.

[7] Ibid., 125.

[8] Ibid., 42.

[9] Quoted in Paul Craig Roberts, The Neoconserative Threat to World Order: America’s Perilous War for Hegemony (Atlanta: Clarity Press, 2015), 195.

[10] Rosefielde, Red Holocaust, 46.

[11] Ibid., 79-80.

[12] “Wiretapped calls reveal communication between Turkish officers and ISIS – report,” Russia Today, December 24, 2015.

[13] “ISIS buries alive dozens of defectors who fled Iraq battlefield – reports,” Russia Today, May 11, 2016.

[14] Preble, “Why Cover for Saudi Arabia?,” National Interest, April 22, 2016.

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on May 8, 2017, With 4500 Reads Filed under World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

3 Responses to "Vladimir Putin Speaks"

  1. davor  May 8, 2017 at 11:52 am

    I have put today Putin’s sunglasses photo magnet on my refrigerator. Sad to say I couldn’t find a single western politician in recent worthy of honoring my kitchen. If I would discuss this matter with my deceased grandmother and her generation who saw USA as the greatest ever imaginable entity in human history they would probably think that the world has changed the poles, or that there was some kind of a cataclysmic social event, but nothing that glamourous, only telling the truth.

  2. JohninMK  May 8, 2017 at 10:20 am

    John Simpson, who richly deserved the tongue lashing, is not just a BBC journalist, he is BBC News royalty.

    Anyone care to name a Western politician with the character and intellectual capability of Putin?

    • JohnZ  May 8, 2017 at 4:07 pm

      Not in Washington anyway. Ron Paul was our best hope. It’s all downhill into the land fill from here.
      Washington is filled with intellectual midgets and morally deficient actors. How did we get into this mess? Controlled media and an ignorant, dis-informed electorate.
      The house is burning down…..no one seems to notice.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network