Radical Islam: King Salman as the Caliph of Sunni Muslims

Saudi King and Buffoon in an ill-fitting fatman suit and cheap tie

 Nauman Sadiq for Veterans Today

The phenomena of Islamic radicalism all over the world is directly linked to the Islamic madrassahs (religious seminaries) that are generously funded by the Gulf’s petro-dollars. These madrassahs attract children from the most impoverished backgrounds in the Third World Islamic countries, because they offer the kind of incentives and facilities which even the government-funded public schools cannot provide: such as, free boarding and lodging, no tuition fee at all and free of cost books and stationery; some generously funded madrassahs even pay monthly stipends to their students.

Apart from madrassahs, another factor that promotes the Wahhabi-Salafi ideology in the Islamic World is the ritual of Hajj and Umrah. Every year, millions of Muslim men and women travel from all over the Islamic world to perform the pilgrimage to Mecca and Medina.

When they return home to their native countries, after spending a month or two in Saudi Arabia, along with clean hearts and souls, they also bring along the tales of Saudi hospitality and their supposedly “true” and “authentic” version of Islam, which some Muslims, especially the backward rural and tribal folks, find attractive and worth-emulating.

Yet another factor which contributes to the rise of Wahhabi-Salafi ideology throughout the Islamic world is the immigrants’ factor. Millions of Muslim men, women and families from all over the Third World Islamic countries live and work in the energy-rich Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Kuwait and Oman. Some of them permanently reside there but mostly they work on temporary work permits.

Just like the pilgrims, when the immigrants return home to their native villages and towns, they also bring along the tales of Saudi hospitality and their version of supposedly “authentic Islam.” Spending time in the Gulf Arab States entitles one to pass authoritative judgments on religious matters, and having a cursory understanding of Arabic, the language of Quran, makes one equivalent of a Qazi (a learned jurist) among the illiterate rural folks; and such charlatans simply reproduce the customs and traditions of the Arabs as the authentic version of Islam to their backward, rural communities.

The Shi’a Muslims have their Imams and Marjahs (religious authorities), but it is generally assumed about Sunni Islam that it discourages the authority of clergy. In this sense, Sunni Islam is closer to Protestantism, at least theoretically, because it prefers an individual and personalized interpretation of scriptures and religion. Although this perception might be true for the educated Sunni Muslims, but on the popular level of the masses of the Third World Islamic countries, the House of Saud plays the same role in the Sunni Islam that the Pope plays in Catholicism.

By virtue of their physical possession of the holy places of Islam – Mecca and Medina – the Saudi kings are the ex officio caliphs of Islam. The title of the Saudi king: “Khadim-ul-Haramain-al-Shareefain” (the Servant of the House of God) makes him the vice-regent of God on earth; and the title of the caliph of Islam is not limited to a single nation state, the Saudi king wields enormous influence throughout the commonwealth of Islam: that is, “the Muslim Ummah.”

Thus, when we hear slogans like “no democracy, just Islam” on the streets of the Third World Islamic countries, one wonders that what kind of a simpleton would forgo one’s right to choose their government through a democratic and electoral process?

This confusion about democracy is partly due to the fact that the masses often conflate democracy with liberalism without realizing that democracy is only a political process for choosing one’s representatives through an electoral process, while liberalism is a cultural mindset which may or may not be suitable for the backward Third World societies depending on their existing level of cultural advancement.

One feels dumbfounded, however, when even supposedly “educated” Muslims argue that democracy is somehow un-Islamic and that an ideal Islamic system of governance is caliphate. Such an ideal caliphate could be some Umayyad or Abbasid model that they conjure up in their minds, but in practice, the only beneficiaries of such a reactionary approach are the illegitimate tyrants of the Arab World who claim to be the caliphs of Islam, albeit indirectly and in a nuanced manner: that is, the Servants of the House of God and the Keepers of the Holy places of Islam.

Regardless, it is generally assumed that political Islam is the precursor of Islamic extremism and terrorism, however, there are two distinct and separate types of political Islam: the despotic political Islam of the Gulf variety and the democratic political Islam of the Turkish and the Muslim Brotherhood variety.

The latter Islamist organization never had a chance to rule over Egypt, except for a brief year-long stint; therefore, it would be unwise to draw any conclusions from such a brief period of time in history. The Turkish variety of political Islam, the oft-quoted “Turkish Model” however, is worth emulating all over the Islamic world.

I do understand that political Islam in all its forms and manifestations is an anathema to liberal sensibilities, but it is the ground reality of the Islamic world. The liberal dictatorships, no matter how benevolent, had never worked in the past, and they will meet the same fate in the future.

The mainspring of Islamic radicalism and militancy isn’t the moderate and democratic political Islam, because why would people turn to violence when they can exercise their right to choose their rulers? The mainspring of Islamic militancy is the despotic and militant political Islam of the Gulf variety.

The illegitimate, and hence insecure, tyrants adopt different strategies to maintain and prolong their hold on power. They readily adopt the pragmatic advice of Machiavelli to his patrons: “Invent enemies and then slay them in order to control your subjects.”

The virulently anti-Shi’a rhetoric of the Gulf-based Wahhabi-Salafi preachers, who are on the payroll of the Gulf’s petro-monarchies, is a cunning divide-and-rule strategy on the lines of Machiavelli’s advice. The illegitimate autocrats of the Gulf States cannot construct a positive narrative that can recount their own achievements, that’s why they espouse a negative narrative in order to vilify their political adversaries for regional dominance in the Middle East.

The Sunni-Shi’a conflict is essentially a political conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran which is presented to the lay Muslims in the veneer of religiosity. Al-Qaeda inspired terrorism is a threat to the Western countries but the Islamic countries are encountering a much bigger threat of sectarian conflict.

For centuries, the Sunni and Shi’a Muslims have coexisted in relative peace throughout the Islamic World, but now certain shady forces are deliberately stoking the fire of inter-sectarian strife to distract attention away from the home front: that is, the popular movements for democracy and enfranchisement in the Arab World.

Notwithstanding, Islam is regarded as the fastest growing religion of the 20th and 21st centuries. There are two factors that are primarily responsible for this atavistic phenomena of Islamic resurgence: first, unlike Christianity, which is more idealistic, Islam is a practical religion, it does not demands from its followers to give up worldly pleasures but only aims to regulate them; and second, Islam as a religion and political ideology has the world’s richest financiers.

After the 1973 collective Arab oil embargo against the West in the wake of the Arab-Israeli war, the price of oil quadrupled; and the contribution of the Gulf’s petro-sheikhs towards “the spiritual well-being” of Muslims all over the world magnified proportionally. This is the reason why we are witnessing an exponential growth of Islamic charities and madrassas all over the world and especially in the Islamic World.

Finally, it’s a misconception that the Arab sheikhs of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and some emirates of UAE generally sponsor the Wahhabi-Salafi sect of Islam, because the difference between numerous sects of Sunni Islam is more nominal than substantive. Islamic charities and madrassas belonging to all the Sunni denominations get generous funding from the Gulf Arab states as well as private donors.

 About the author:

Nauman Sadiq is an Islamabad-based attorney, columnist and geopolitical analyst focused on the politics of Af-Pak and Middle East regions, neocolonialism and petroimperialism.

Kind regards,

.

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on May 30, 2017, With 1542 Reads Filed under Investigations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

7 Responses to "Radical Islam: King Salman as the Caliph of Sunni Muslims"

  1. Jaffer Jamil  May 31, 2017 at 6:51 am

    There is one significant point that Caliphate-proposers overlook. [Putting aside the Shia claim of succession, which really makes the Agha Khan the rightful heir, being the descendant of the first-born (albeit of the 2nd son)]. Upon the passing away of the Prophet (pbuh), when the succession discussions came up, the Bani Tamim (Al Tamimi) proposed one of theirs as the Caliph. To which they were told that the Caliph can only be from the Quraish.

    The Shias don’t bring it up in their narratives, since they reject all the Quraish in favor of the younger son of Syedna Ali (kw), Syedna Hussein (ra) [which in itself leads to argument wielded by the descendants of the elder son, the Hassanis, that “how can you (Hussainis) claim to be anything if we, who are from an older son, are not?”].

    The Sunnis don’t bring it up as it de-legitimizes the claim of the Ottomans to be Caliph, since they were not from the Quraish. It also precludes the Saudi, Kuwaiti and most royal families of the Persian Gulf, except for the Al-Qassimi family.

  2. Eduardo  May 30, 2017 at 4:05 pm

    A big complement to the team who does the pictures for the VT layout.
    Nice little family. All got their toys and are now ready play with the world and themselves.

  3. hatch  May 30, 2017 at 10:19 am

    Highly idiosyncratic article confusing traditional Sunni Islam with non- or even anti-traditional (if not anti Islamic) Wahabism.
    I doubt even hardcore wahabis see the saudi king as some kind of caliph figure.
    By inferring the title of simpleton on any Muslim not in favour of democracy (which was introduced and enforced globally merely for global rule) then he is denouncing all great Islamic (as well as other traditional) saints, sages and scholars, people of infinitely greater intelligence and spirituality than himself. See scholar-sages such as Martin Lings, Rene Guenon, Ananda Coomaraswami, saints such as Sheikh Nazim, current scholars such as Imran Hosein who VT contributor Kevin Barretts has suggested may be the most important Islamic scholar today. And this guy thinks theyre all dimwits compared to himself?
    God forbid all Muslim countries only aspire to the level of Turkey. And Islam doesnt require giving up of pleasures compared to Christianity? Haha, pull the other one. And droves of Westerners are converting because of those pesky rich Wahabis and their oh so alluring wahabi mosques and ideology in the west? Hahaha

  4. joetv  May 30, 2017 at 8:33 am

    A very good article for the novice. However you do not get to the bottom, to the meat of the problem. Why is there such a violent schism within the Islamic faith? Who promotes it? Who benefits from it? I think the answers are beyond fixating on one group who happen to own certain revered property. Rather than ending your story here, why not carry your thoughts out to a.more logical comclusion. You open a door to a room crowded with demons. Please continue.

    • Abbass  May 30, 2017 at 11:22 pm

      The story of the schism in Islam is bot simple and complex and I am not sure how well a non-Muslim is going to understand it. It requires at least a good understanding of Islam’s history and then finding out what each side says about the events following the death of Muhammad (SAW). In the end the answer is simple and it is why I went from Sunni to Shia islam myself but most Sunnis will never confront the reality and prefer to argue around the facts and confuse things which doesn’t make it easier. I suggest a good start once you know about Islamic history from the life of our Prophet until his death is to research the “Incident of the Pen” as it is usually called. You will need to know who Umar is though, his history and how he came to be a companion of the Prophet to grasp the meaning of what trasnpired though.. There’s a reason few outside Islam understand the sectarian division between Sunni and Shia Islam or why it is so intense. It can however be ignored and one’s Islam treated as a here and now thing with ancient history beyond our control but it suffers whenever some self rightous Sunni or some Salafi moron starts on about Shias.

  5. davor  May 30, 2017 at 8:20 am

    Great article. Salafism without western military advisers and trainers cannot last a day, or a fortnight. Hence all the petrodollars about.

  6. Trakkath  May 30, 2017 at 7:27 am

    Those who pay for the music can decide which music shall been played. It is all about money and a hungry stomach makes everyone a traitor.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network