9/11 Focus, Videos While Waiting for My Book


Two Videos That Help Us Remember the Basics on 9/11

By Dimitri Khalezov with Gordon Duff

Dimitri is finishing his new book for publication.  As usual, I will review and re-translate from Dimitri’s version of English to my own version of Pidgin.

While we ask you set sit down and view the two short videos, I will remind our readers that Dimitri was interviewed in Bangkok in 2007.  There, the FBI heard his testimony about Mossad taking credit for 9/11, Oklahoma City and their attempt to hire Dimitri to help with the Bali bombings.

During the interview, the FBI told Khalezov that they had learned that the planes that hit the towers contained nuclear weapons.

Remember, we are quoting what the FBI said, not what Dimitri or others have proven or believe.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

Also note that former NYPD detective and Secret Service OST agent, Bennette’s legal problems, which a cursory search will bring up are not the basis of our interest.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

 For general background, please reference this 2011 radio interview with Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khaleov and me.

YouTube - Veterans Today -



Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:

All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Some content may be satirical in nature. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within are full responsibility of author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on January 27, 2013, With 5342 Reads Filed under Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

23 Responses to "9/11 Focus, Videos While Waiting for My Book"

  1. Linkster  January 30, 2013 at 12:22 am

    the plane that hit the pentagon and the one that crashed in Pennsylvania had many passengers on board confirmed by flight manifest and grieving families, etc. nukes in the WTC, etc would have been detected afterwards by sensitive monitoring equipment but were not, a few of the terrorists were caught on camera in at least one airport just prior to them boarding a plane, Bin Laden was caught bragging about it on videotape, the Dmitri guy is a character—that’s all—has anyone considered a russian intelligence agent or just a plain liar or some goofball having fun at others’ expense per gullibility, naivete or lack of clear thinking, errorists with boxcutters, etc. that were happy to die—hijacking planes, crashing them on purpose with Al Qaida-Bin Laden backing, etc. really is what happened, the towers collapsed from impact, high heat, weakening of structural integrity, etc, etc.

    yawn to all else, fun and interesting stuff to read however

    • Gordon Duff  January 30, 2013 at 8:20 am


      Your assertions are based on fairy tales. Bin Laden denied involvement. You read too many comic books.

      Real MC.

  2. James Robertson  January 29, 2013 at 8:08 pm

    Victor, a cursory glance at video of WTC 7’s collapse will show that it took place at close to free fall speed and with near perfect symmetry. A cursory glance at the history books reveals that this happened to no other steel framed skyscraper ever, before or after September 11, without explosives. A cursory glance at WTC 7 prior to it’s collapse will indicate that whatever structural damage was caused by the demolition of the Twin towers was not remotely symmetrical and therefore could not possibly cause a symmetrical collapse let alone at free fall speed.
    Your comment about the firefighters is a farcical non sequitar, I suggest that you return to the firefighters testimonies and take note please of the scores of references to explosions in the buildings all throughout the WTC complex on September 11th. Since you’re such an authority on the firefighters testimonies, why don’t you try quoting any of them? We don’t have to prove that destroying WTC7 in a controlled demolition was a logical thing to do, only that it happened, fool. The story you are telling is a pathetic joke and so are you.

    • wolf  February 1, 2013 at 8:49 pm

      Hey Victor, how much do you get paid to post these inane comments? You do ok with English as a second language though.

      All three of the WTC Towers’ destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives because of the following:

      1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
      2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
      3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction
      4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
      5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally
      6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
      7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
      8.1200-foot-diameter debris field: no “pancaked” floors found
      9. Isolated explosive ejections 20–40 stories below demolition front
      10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
      11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises
      12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples
      13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples

      And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire such as:

      1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
      2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
      3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
      4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer-lasting fires have never collapsed

  3. atlantabill  January 29, 2013 at 3:48 pm

    Thanks, Dr Duff, for giving Dimitri Khalezov a continuing platform. I was for a while a Judy Woods fan, and then I was alerted to her methodological problems by the mini-nuke theorists and persuaded even more by Dr Jim Fetzer’s experiences with the Wood cult and my own experiences with it. The report that Dimitri Khalezov brings by way of his experience in the USSR military (not technically a theory since it’s a purported government documentation of facts) makes more sense to me nowadays than any of the theories I see out there. The potential problem with the lack of compromise to the WTC “bathtub” can be explained the same way one would explain the small entry hole in an armored vehicle from a Venturi device such as an RPG rocket. By the way, I greatly appreciate your putting the kibosh on the rehashed Goebbelsian antisemitism that’s far too rampant in the 9/11 community, as you did today in an interview on the Rense network. I disagree, however, with your assessment of Bolshevism, a term loosely banded about by people who lean toward fascism and bearing no relation to the historical reality. Stalin’s totalitarianism was a COUNTERFEIT Bolshevism in the same way that Hitler’s “National Socialism” was a counterfeited socialism. The original Bolsheviks (Russian for “majority-ists”) opposed the treachery of those who supported “their” respective national governments in the insane carnage of World War I (and who were referred to in Russian as the “Mensheviks”). John Reed’s first-hand report in his book is an excellent source from which to understand the difference, but there is also abundant on-line source material in the anti-Stalinist research library at Marxists.org. Stalin came to power by way of a COUNTERREVOLUTION which eventually betrayed nearly all the classic tenets of Marxism. As for antisemitism as a diversion from the true source of despotism, I’ll paraphrase the (real) Bolshevik Vladimir Lenin, who remarked that EVERY nation, INCLUDING the Jews, has its rich men who would resort to any degree of barbarism and mass murder to increase their wealth and defend their rule.

    • Gordon Duff  January 29, 2013 at 9:16 pm

      over 11 years, we have found the culprits, little doubt of that

      however, we sit drowning in evidence that nobody wants…

      then we look to the role of, not just Judy Wood, but others of her ilk and their acolytes

      and it all begins to come together

    • etominusipi  January 30, 2013 at 11:36 am

      “…by their fruits ye shall know them” Matt 7:20

  4. Allesandro  January 28, 2013 at 10:11 am

    A thought. Is it possible to set-up a link and account for Dimitri through VT, so that we could pre-buy his book? This, if possible would give him resources, that he could use now, when he needs them

  5. Allesandro  January 28, 2013 at 10:02 am


    In listening to the interview this time, I was surprised to learn of the “Granit” being used in a set-up to gets the “Officials” to come to the conclusion that 2 more nukes could have been on the WTC planes, that they could have caused many more thousands to die in NYC, and thus bringing them to the conclusion they needed to detonate the nukes in the base of the buildings bringing them down.

    Maybe it was me being inadvertent when I listened to it before (several times), but it seemed new to me this time. That would mean that they killed 3,000 Americans, because of panic caused by the physiological dilemma they were deliberately put in. It would explain a lot as to the total vilification of the truth movement. But it also gives us much more, like what planning was put into the premeditated action of Harari and Mossad to bring about the killing of so many Americans. They knew and scripted the story, per-planned the information flow into NORAD and elsewhere, knew the protocols and decision making process that would get the American Govt to murder their own citizens, thinking they were choosing the lesser of 2 evils.

    Certainly no Al-Quida or other supposed terrorist organizations could have managed the intricacies at all these levels, only insiders and Israel could with Mossad have accomplished such a malevolent series of treacherous steps needed to pull it off, along with media control to “Sell” the public narrative.

    And now we know about Oklahoma, and there are probably others, what a tangled web of treachery, decades in the making. All-in-all 9/11 was so far the crown jewel of treachery. Does it end here?

  6. Allesandro  January 28, 2013 at 8:30 am


    I’ve listened to the interview with Dimitri and you, several times. It takes more than one take, for it and the implications to sink in. It is a GREAT SERVICE to mankind. Thank you and Dimitri and the host of the program. I’ve watched and listened to everything from you and Dimitri since. Thank you and him for the follow-ups.

    Fascinating, and triple relevant to all that has gone on and tied directly to what is occurring today.

  7. Charlotte NC Bill  January 27, 2013 at 8:01 pm

    Psst, here’s a clue: if Dr. Judy won’t mention “Mossad” and “9-11” in the same sentance then she’s as phoney as Julian Assange..

    • LoPhatt  January 27, 2013 at 9:05 pm

      I agree Bill. She did a pretty good job of pointing out anomalies. I don’t buy her conclusions nor her refusal to discuss any other explanation. She even says she “worries” that people questioning this might come to distrust their government. She won’t entertain questions of “who”. She’s “Nancy Grace certain it wasn’t nukes though!”. Musta been Samoans.

    • OrdinarySerf  January 31, 2013 at 7:04 am

      I think that comment of hers has been seized upon Stephen. I don’t personally have a problem with Dr Wood investigating the scientific aspects behind those towers collapsing and examining what happened when (as she puts it) “they just went away”. Her background is in mechanical engineering and structural analysis, it seems perfectly normal for a science based prof to restrict her investigations to that and not get into the wider debate as to who did it and why……that is for others to hypothesize.

  8. DaveE  January 27, 2013 at 5:35 pm

    Thanks, Dmitri. I promise to buy as many copies of your book as I can afford and distribute them to as many as I can.

    You may not realize it, but you are an ESSENTIAL asset in bringing the zionists who did 9/11 to justice. (Just like they destroyed Russia.) Hopefully we can get the job done a little quicker, this time.

    God Bless You.

  9. LoPhatt  January 27, 2013 at 4:29 pm

    Dr. Duff, thanks for the article. I’m anxious to read his book. From the beginning the things that really stood out were the explosions in the sub-basement area with accompanying burns and the “dustification” of “the spire”, pictured in so many videos. While not an expert, I have worked with steel quite a bit in my younger years and am familiar with its properties. Also, concrete does not sublimate unless exposed to extremely high temperatures. I’ve suffered much ridicule from people who won’t accept my theory that nukes, or some other heretofore unusual physical interaction was at work here.
    While I’m not an adherent of Judy Woods she does point out interesting phenomena that can’t be explained away by conventional explosives. While I don’t know, it seems nukes are a better guess than “directed energy” which I don’t know enough about to hazard a guess. I’m not sure how devices in the basement would create a top-down destruction. I won’t call it a collapse because it wasn’t.
    The burning cars, etc., are also a clue. Those of us who’ve moved way beyond the “did they, didn’t they” stage in this tend to forget how damaging something like this is to the whole storyline.
    It is so blatant at this point that most of the world is sure this is a false-flag that we look stupid. It takes willful ignorance to avoid the obvious. This is a crime and his testimony would be damning.
    I had not seriously considered pre-planted devices. I suppose, given the nature of some of the work carried on in the building and perhaps the gold repositories, etc., they might have wanted to have destruct devices in place as a “selling point”. He is also correct, in my opinion, that they would be required per treaty to share that information with the former USSR. I don’t know what to make of the discussion about “deciding” to “pull” the buildings due to the missile at the Pentagon. That seems a stretch. Maybe what he’s trying to say is a little lost in translation.
    Anyway, thanks again. Very thought provoking.

    • Charlotte NC Bill  January 27, 2013 at 7:19 pm

      Yes, the false-flag/Mossad hit on america is obvious…But that’s oh-so sophisticated modern man for you…In the ancient world if a little boy said, “look the Emperor has no clothes, the tailor lied..” Everybody would agree…Now? now they would call the little boy a “conspiracy nut..”

    • wiggins  January 28, 2013 at 7:47 am

      “Conspiracy nut” – is shorthand for, unspeakable truth.

    • LoPhatt  January 28, 2013 at 7:14 pm

      Yes, “name calling” is pretty sophisticated stuff when one is being willfully ignorant. It’s a form of plugging one’s ears and mumbling “neener, neener!”. They’re pissing on our heads and telling us its raining. “Qui bono?” I say. The “who” is pretty obvious, the “how” takes longer.

  10. CoJonesGrandes  January 27, 2013 at 3:57 pm

    Here’s an interview with Khalezov in 2011

    • Justin Kennedy  January 28, 2013 at 9:57 pm

      Thanks for the link to the Mathaba interview, it capsulizes Dimitri’s position well and is easier to understand. Looking forward to his new book!

      A couple of points which stick out about 9/11, the whole event was as phoney as heck! The airliners which just disappeared into the twin towers without any deformation or deceleration. The towers exploded and turned to dust before they collapsed, there was no floor-by-floor pancake collapse. The non-airline crash in Shanksville. No airplane, no bodies, no luggage. The non-airline crash in the Pentagon. No airplane, no bodies, no luggage. Passenger airlines supposedly flying at 500 knots near sea level. A technical impossibility according to expert pilots. The earthquakes which preceded each tower collapse and the cauldrons of molten rock and debris which burned for over 100 days under all 3 towers. Not your typical building demolitions or airliner crashes.

  11. CoJonesGrandes  January 27, 2013 at 3:55 pm

    If you wish to send money to Khalezov, there’s a transcript of his video on how to do so at:

  12. CoJonesGrandes  January 27, 2013 at 3:51 pm

    There’s an English version of Khlaezov’s Nexus article at:
    No doubt the CIA will have that webpage flagged up as being chock full of malware – which is not true.

  13. CoJonesGrandes  January 27, 2013 at 3:44 pm

    Gordon, go clobber them with Khalezov’s book.
    I hope he sells millions.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network