Is Alex Jones a Complete Idiot?

No! Absolutely not!  He’s only a partial idiot


by Kevin Barrett


In some ways, Alex is a genius. He figured out 9/11 was an inside job before it even happened.  Me, I’m a slow learner. It took me two years to be sure.

Alex is also a genius of an orator, like William Jennings Bryan on bad acid. He doesn’t just talk your socks off, he talks your socks into ripping themselves off your feet and fleeing in terror from the coming New World Order dictatorship with its billions of hollow-point bullets, techno-torture machines, and Halliburton death camps.

Unlike me, Alex doesn’t let his radio guests talk much. But that’s okay, because Alex is such a talented ranter that you have to keep listening in terrified fascination.

The best thing about Alex is that he covers all kinds of critically important stories that the mainstream media covers up – 9/11, political assassinations, the evils of empire, the shredding of the Constitution, the bankster plan for a New World Order global dictatorship. His heart is always in the right place, and his mind usually is too.

But not always.

Alex raised some eyebrows when he told us who REALLY runs Hollywood: The Arabs!  That’s why they give us so many movies with Arab and Muslim villains – because they WANT us to hate them and smash their countries and murder millions of them on behalf of Israel!

YouTube - Veterans Today -

No wonder Alex didn’t get invited to the Hollywoodism conference in Tehran.

Of course, to be fair, Alex did issue a clarification, admitting that (as we all know) Hollywood is predominantly Jewish.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

Alex is notorious for going easy on Zionism. If he didn’t, maybe the JDL would take him out? Maybe you just aren’t allowed to tell the truth about Zionism if you have millions of listeners?

Alex’s latest outburst of complete & utter idiocy: Dancing on the grave of the world’s number one anti-New World Order leader, Hugo Chavez, who was murdered by the very banksters Alex claims to oppose.

To be fair, let’s admit that Alex has also posted some decent stories on Chavez’s assassination:

But the when you Google “Infowars Chavez assassinated” two of the top three stories are insane anti-Chavez rants by Mike Adams.

Mike Adams says Hugo Chavez was “socialist.” So Mike, you want the oil majors (owned by the New World Order Zionist banksters) to steal all the oil from Venezuela and let the Venezuelan people rot in poverty?! That’s why they killed Chavez, says Greg Palast.

I guess it’s “socialism” to argue that a finite natural resource like oil shouldn’t just be owned by a handful of NWO banking families, who use their oil profits to build the global dictatorship you’re always ranting against.

I guess it’s “socialism” to say that some of that oil wealth should be used for education and infrastructure and medical care for people who would be dirt-poor otherwise.

If that’s the case, anyone with a grain of common sense is a “socialist.”

Which makes you an idiot.

And it makes Alex a partial idiot for trumpeting your idiocy to the world.

Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:

All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within this post are the full responsibility of the author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on March 11, 2013, With 16813 Reads Filed under New World Order War, WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

91 Responses to "Is Alex Jones a Complete Idiot?"

  1. MoT  March 14, 2013 at 2:47 am

    Jones has a terrible speaking style. It sounds like he is constantly in need of throat lozenges or has a mouth full of spittle. And I still to this day don’t understand why he even bothers having so-called “guests” on his so-called “show” when he constantly talks over them. He, like Limbaugh, is enamored with the sound of his own mewling noises.

  2. Charlemagne  March 13, 2013 at 9:58 pm

    For what it’s worth, add this to the stew:
    Alternative Media King Hires CIA–Stratfor Agent as Publishing Editor In Chief

  3. reenie  March 12, 2013 at 7:50 pm

    I know that recent information has come out about the John Hopkin’s genetic study by a young Israeli-American who has proven again that the jewish population in Israel is not related to the Israelite’s of old,and therefore have no claim to the land.I would like to know if anyone on this forum can talk about the 7 noahide laws that I have looked into.Are they for real,or did people make this up?

  4. NavyBrat  March 12, 2013 at 4:14 pm

    For Alex’s controller, look no further than his agent Ari Emanuel, brother to Rahm Emanuel – sons of Irgun terorists.

  5. XINTERIX  March 12, 2013 at 11:47 am

    this site is worse than mainstream. why won’t you post my comments. It appears you must be only picking the ones you like and filtering the others. that is not a form of free speech

  6. XINTERIX  March 12, 2013 at 11:45 am

    Just so you know, yes Chavez was against the NWO, he hated the West, and he struggled real hard resisting them, and for that he should be remembered and respected. But that does not change the fact that he is, or I’m sorry, WAS, a socialist dictator, which is EVIL.
    People are capable of recognizing more than one type of evil. You must be one who believes the phrase that an enemy of my enemy is a friend of mine. Even if that enemy is Socialist?????
    So let me get this strait, are you claiming that Jones is supporting Zionist and NWO because he dislikes Chavez? Or maybe your suggesting that there is only one type of evil, which is the Zionists, and all other Evils are good. Did you actually make the claim that Chavez was not Socialist? Because if you did, than it’s you, who’s the idiot. How could you possibly believe Chavez is not Socialist.

    • shalomjuitsie  March 13, 2013 at 6:59 am

      What,you prefer fake democracy .Chavez was great because he stood for his peeps.Jones is an Israli puppet, you know, th De country where all or politicians sell out our ppl too? :*

    • shalomjuitsie  March 13, 2013 at 8:08 am

      After a critical study of the Protocols we realise with surprise that the difference between Bolshevism and Capitalism is illusory. The Elders of Zion were clearly aware that Bolshevism is nothing else but the end-product of liberal-capitalism, i.e. both are two different forms of the same totalitarian rule, and the ideology of both essentially consists of the elements contained in materialism, minority-


      rule, the lavish use of the cheque-book and the terrorism of the tommy-gun.”

  7. XINTERIX  March 12, 2013 at 11:44 am

    So let me get this strait, are you claiming that Jones is supporting Zionist and NWO because he dislikes Chavez? Or maybe your suggesting that there is only one type of evil, which is the Zionists, and all other Evils are good. Did you actually make the claim that Chavez was not Socialist? Because if you did, than it’s you, who’s the idiot. How could you possibly believe Chavez is not Socialist.
    Just so you know, yes Chavez was against the NWO, he hated the West, and he struggled real hard resisting them, and for that he should be remembered and respected. But that does not change the fact that he is, or I’m sorry, WAS, a socialist dictator, which is EVIL.
    People are capable of recognizing more than one type of evil. You must be one who believes the phrase that an enemy of my enemy is a friend of mine. Even if that enemy is Socialist?????

  8. XINTERIX  March 12, 2013 at 11:43 am


  9. joesigur  March 12, 2013 at 10:42 am

    Icke is “kosher” conspiracy- ppl thinks he is honest about zionists, but he covers for the jews by making the problem seem like it’s just some ppl with dual loyalties- he won’t touch the fact that masons all serve jewish aims- he bans ppl from his site that boldly out the jewish elite talmudist leaders. Anyone who knows that the problem is Talmud belief in origin also knows that Alex and David and the like are all just a little too kosher- ok for herding sheep towards truth but unable to take them all the way

  10. captain obvious  March 12, 2013 at 9:26 am

    yup, during encampment grove security is pretty darn tight, it’d be about impossible to sneak in, then hang around for hours to get the footage and sneak back out. I’ve been inside off season, knew a whole lot of grove employees too when a youngin in sonoma county. I cant doubt what youre saying.

  11. DaveE  March 12, 2013 at 9:12 am

    I’m not going to defend Jones, but I can tell you from first-hand experience that it is almost IMPOSSIBLE to function in the mainstream (corporate) media and speak the truth about Jews and zionism on a regular basis.

    It would be like walking onto a job site as a contractor and making comments about the other contractors’ mothers.

    • talmudawaregoyim  March 12, 2013 at 1:44 pm

      yes, only those who will lie for power need apply. It’s my view that the only reason to be on MSM is to out the zionist jewish problem- otherwise you are catering to it-doesn’t deserve a white wash

  12. captain obvious  March 12, 2013 at 4:12 am

    lol, I dont buy the monica story for a second..

    militias were forming as result of Waco and Ruby Ridge,
    OKC was investigating Iran-contra.. and “kaboom”, what investigation?
    then they trotted out the monica lewinsky blue dress sideshow..
    as the guys ask “well gee what could be wrong with a BJ?”
    and the girls say “omfg that poor woman hillary!” (for future pity votes!)

    are you familiar with Cathy Obrien and “mind control out of control”?
    she tells it she was a compartmentalized sexual playtoy and courier,
    as well as hillary having a bigtime sexual preference for women.
    it’s pretty supportive to my “monica lewinsky blue dress sideshow” idea.
    treasonous psychopathic manipulators, are not victims!

    (you’ve shown me good stuff before, hope this shares some back!)

    • DaveE  March 12, 2013 at 9:19 am

      Somehow all the non-Jewess chicks Billy boned didn’t seem to have quite the impact, did they?

    • captain obvious  March 12, 2013 at 10:04 am

      lol idk that monica was a trap, I’d think more publicity stunt with some of billybob’s horndoggery being pretty well known.. he’s psychopathic enough to have known and played along too!
      when in doubt (how many times caught lying?) never believe anything from em ever again.

      impeached but still politically active, is also criminal.

    • joesigur  March 12, 2013 at 10:49 am

      Hillary’s a lesbian and quite used to the freak show these elites have going on with beta slaves and crap-Monica is probably MK ultra and Linda Tripp was undercover as well, not just a secretary-if you get my drift

    • captain obvious  March 12, 2013 at 12:15 pm

      yup.Cathy Obrien explained quite a bit about how mind controlled..
      hillary is a LOT more evil than most would ever begin to think,
      and its right there in everyones face if theyed only LOOK a little.

      ok bad joke time..
      Monica Lewinski opened a dry cleaning business,
      the sign out front: “drop your pants and jacket off”.

    • joesigur  March 12, 2013 at 10:52 am

      there’s 8 hours of Kay Griggs testimony-fascinating stuff!

  13. matthewmccauley  March 11, 2013 at 8:41 pm

    Can someone recommend a good work re The Byzantine Empire?

    • nofolalo  March 12, 2013 at 3:38 am

      There are many search results from Google and other engines, just search “Byzantine Empire”. That will likely yield your best results in the long run.

      Here’s why I think so; because, it’s a topic of somewhat special interest. Constantine split the Roman Empire, designating two capitals; Rome in the West, and Constantinople in the East.

      Conflict between the two gradually developed along Ecclesiastical, Economic, and Political lines.

      Basically, Byzantium in the East, can be compared, to the Holy Roman Empire in the West.

      We descend (Europe and it’s extension in America historically ) from The Holy Roman Empire.

      The Ottoman Empire, a later development than the Byzantium moved in on much of the Geography. Their history too, now.

      The only real extension into our times now of Byzantium, rests in those Orthodox Christian Communions that originated from it. Then, many of the good historical works on Byzantium will be in Greek, or languages used by those, that are now in the process of keeping what remains of Byzantium alive.

      You may just luck out, and find some ‘Translated’ works.

    • matthewmccauley  March 13, 2013 at 3:52 pm

      Thanks nofolalo.

    • wiggins  March 14, 2013 at 6:18 am

      “Julian” by Gore Vidal is a good – lighthearted – read on the subject.

  14. matthewmccauley  March 11, 2013 at 8:31 pm

    Alex Jones is like a mediocre religion that gives out some % truth and keeps you in a cul de sac of fear and anger with ever greater threats and miscarriages of justice, and abuses of power with no solution.

    Two litmus tests: Hugo Chavez and 911.

    Chavez stood squarely for his people in opposition to imperial swine. Debates concerning the definition of socialism are distractions.

    911 was imperial swine at work, and the US gov is riddled with dual citizen Jews. Outranking the gov are banking houses like Rothschild and Goldman Sachs, and satellites.

    Can someone recommend a great work re the Byzantine Empire?

    Kevin Barrett has stones the size of Phobos, kind of like El Commandante.

  15. tammyc  March 11, 2013 at 7:37 pm

    Your a tool Barrett. It doesn’t matter whether your Alex Jones or a writer for Veterans Today…your still controlled oposition. I say this because if the PTB didn’t want you saying something then it’s a gaurantee you would not be saying it. Period. This is your future. You won’t be allowed to say what you want when you want. So, the question begs to be asked, why on earth would you waste the little time you have left attacking someone else who has spent 17 years trying to warn people about the NWO?

    • joesigur  March 12, 2013 at 10:18 am

      Tammy, the “elephant in the room” is the jews (kevin would say zionists).Alex is working out of a zionist radio station-Alex gets on zionist tv (they are promoting him!) Alex bans ppl from his forum that boldly talk about the “jewish problem”. Alex’s wife was a hasbera agent in her younger days- Alex has cancelled 2nd interviews with ppl that put Israel and jews on the spot. Tammy-you do know that the jews won WWII as well as made sure WWII happened. Just look around and see who is in controll and who can’t be criticized! perhaps find a good book about the roots of communism and it’s link to zionism

    • matthewmccauley  March 13, 2013 at 3:54 pm

      That book is called: The Controversy of Zion, by Douglas Reed.

    • wiggins  March 14, 2013 at 6:27 am

      Also a good book on the subject (download online) :

  16. Solfeggio  March 11, 2013 at 6:37 pm

    The divisions within the truth movement reveal the lack of common understanding of many common terms, concepts, and philosophies. Whether you think Alex Jones is an idiot, a disinformation agent, or just a frustrating truther that disagrees with your particular conception of the world’s problem — all traces back to this fundamental issue.

    Yes, the Health Ranger is a good guy. And Alex Jones comes off as a good guy to me. And so many of the diverse personalities that gather in that clique. However, I find that many truthers, including that interlocking cottage industry of truth, arbitrarily choose their dividing line between propaganda and accepted truth, even when all that raw data essentially comes to us from secondary sources that we can’t confirm. So we all suspend our trust somewhere, but our ideological opponents will often still carry some remnant of official dogma or narrative. Sandy Hook is the classic example. Many truthers will be quick to raise a suspician, but yet while they question the government’s punchline, they basically accept without question the government’s premise — that a bunch of kids were killed that day. And after they make what they believe to be a counter-judgement on reality, they pat themselves on the back for being “wide awake”; then quickly get on a soap box to join the chorus that the “sky is falling.”

    Jessie Ventura even has a television show championing conspiracy theories, but wrote on his website that he can see no evidence pointing to the event being anything other than what the government told us. Mike Rivero stubbornly believes the culprit is anti-depressants! Most of this well known group shys away from no-plane theory, and refuses to question the veracity of the Apollo Missions. They are certainly a curious, conservative group of truthers who rarely get close to the dangerous material. Almost as if they were just a distraction. Hmmm…

    So we consider ourselves truth advocates, but do we all mean the same thing when we call out the corruption in the world? Because if Alex Jones thinks socialism is the great evil, he might actually be demonizing a philosophy I think could benefit our ravaged world. And consequently, if we do not all conceive of the problems as the same, do we all even imply that a similar solution is required to fix the world? Because I think it is curious when truthers supposedly on “our side” become strange bedfellows with the enemy. So if Alex Jones demonizes Hugo Chavez, he stands right beside the neocons and George Bush, el diablo. In the JFK community, if so-called intelligent researchers can’t accept the obvious alteration of the Zapruder film, they stand right beside the CIA cabal that assassinated JFK, and right beside the 6th Floor museum that covers up the truth to this day.

    Whether the current divisions in the truth movement are a statistical result of human nature, or whether they are just carefully seeded factions that erupt from disinformation, the result is the same — a very frustration ideological war is created with every possible permutation of truth turf staked out by intellectuals who are convinced of their righteous cause.

    We all know exactly what I mean, and nothing is more frustrating than when someone who is supposedly on our side (say, 911 Truth), but somehow refuse to conceptualize the event in our paradigm (no planes versus drones, nuclear demolition versus directed energy, etc).

    In the JFK community, to cite just one example, the debates are so heated and disrespectful, that the alliance between the bad guys and the good guys who disagree with us are blurred, and entire community is a disjointed group of warring cliques. And I am pretty sure none of them are objective in viewing new evidence, devoid of their ideological filters. What a shame.

    And this phenomena is to be expected to some degree because the issues in question are unknown, mysterious events that only be described through inference, deduction, careful reasoning, and most of all, whether we admit it or not, through intuition and discernment based on past precedent.

    The degree to which one was able to discern the suspicious nature of Sandy Hook was largely correlated with one’s experience with such para-political events. That is because these men and women have already questioned their basic assumptions about the nature of government; not because they are smarter or more perceptive. But even among this savvy subset of the population that instantly questioned the event, there was a wide degree of latitude in what they concluded really happened. At one end of the spectrum were the truthers who posited an MK Ultra assassin, rogue NWO mercenaries, or even just a pharmaceutically inspired killing spree that was maximized for political benefit. On the other end of the spectrum were those truthers that declared the whole event to be nothing more than a homeland security drill, a hoax designed to push an agenda.

    Why the diversity in opinion among our own experienced truth-seekers? Or in other words, why can the anti-depressant crowd fail to consider the hoax as the most simple, and thus more likely possibility? In my opinion, it goes back to their familiarity with precedent, and with their paradigms of the world; and yes, even that hidden para-political world. Those researchers who were already very familiar with the media fakery of 911, the animated airplanes, and the bad actors on the street — these researchers wasted no time is seeing Sandy Hook as the hoax it was. But for the others, it was anamolous. It seemed like a bridge to far for their minds to traverse…

    but if you think about it, thier position is utterly arbitrary. They are essentially choosing the moment they wish to disagree with official declarations. They are willing to accept the premise, but just not the punchline. Why would the government lie about Adam Lanza? This they think is a reasonable question. But if you asked, “Would they lie about the murder even taking place to begin with?” Ouch. Too far!

    CUriously, the other large subset of people too accept the event as an all-out hoax were those relatively new to the truth community, who had not yet bought into overly ornate mythologies of MK Ultra, ritual abuse patterns. So they simply called what was the most evident from common sense…

    But if you notice who are among the people who didn’t accept the event as a hoax, it was that Alex Jones, Health Ranger, Jessie Ventura, Mike Rivero, crowd. That same orbit of so-called truthers. The well known ones who seem to exist as an interlocking cottage industry of truth. Very interesting…

    Are they disinformation? Or perhaps just half truthers? They seem so likable and give a lot of good info out. IT just seems that when it comes to the institutional, key issues, they don’t like the paradigm-busting exposures.

    Now there would not be a general truth movement, or any singular audience (like the readership of VT), if there were not at least a very generalized set of ideas that we all agree with.

    And in-between the mainstream and the obvious counter-narratives we all agree with, there is the nebulous border that is disputed, with the various subjects of controversy between truth factions. I think human caused Global Warming is part of larger misinformation campaign, but others — including Gordon Duff and Jim Fetzer — disagree.

    Similarly, a disproportionately large section of truth advocates have no problem in rejecting every mainstream aspect of our society, but nevertheless, they still hold the notion of Capitalism as a sacrosanct institution. Unfortunately, this all results from a fundamental lack of collective understanding as to the specific definitions of various abstract concepts: Capitalism, Socialism… When we think of socialism, we can’t help but integrate unconsciously a myriad of disparate metaphors, subconcepts, and various opinions that we have absorbed over a lifetime.

    Even if you step back and question every assumption you have about political philosophy, you would be able to conceive of the relative pros and cons of our own constitution, structure of government, and a host of values and ideas we just take for granted. One unfortunate result of this mental auto-pilot is that you can have an entire movement, “The Patriot, Liberty, or what not”, and the movement will essentially contain both positive philosophy but also contradictions and sacred cows. This is why so-called Patriots were immediately suspicious of Occupy Wall Street and its more socialist approach, despite the fact that theoretically both movements are reformist and seek most of the same ends.

    So the criticism of Hugo Chavez is a repeat of this in a smaller scale, where Chavez is denied his heroic status because he possessed the very ideals that JFK did? Speaking of JFK, there is a subtle irony involving many conservative truthers. The assassination of JFK is a big talking point for Alex Jones and other right wing liberty lovers, even despite the fact that they would have hated him back in 1963 for many of the same false crimes they now hate Obama.

    To be fair, I don’t like Obama anymore, but for the opposite reasons that conservatives bring up. My dad hates Obama, for example, which should bond us as a rare political agreement. But unfortunately, my dad is a Fox News lover, and he hates Obama only because he thinks Obama is a socialist who doesn’t support colonial policies as he should.

    Yet I hate Obama for the opposite reason! Because Obama has proved a counterfeit socialist, revealing his fascist true colors! We must understand the terms we use. We must understand who the good guys are and who the bad guys are, and that means knowing what the problem is with the world, and what the potential solutions are.

    Another controversial arena: the Jews are not the problem, and naming them as such will never help the cause of freedom. However it is a very plausible argument that Jews should not have disproportionate control of Hollywood, Washington or any other influential body, for the very reasons no single definable group should exist in tyrannical majorities. So such a structural defect should always be mentioned, or whatever else is related to a given complaint.

    Thus, in my opinion and to conclude, Alex Jones and the Health Ranger have naive political philosophies that only assist the tyranny of mafia capitalism. When they foolishly suggest the liberation of free markets are the solution to our world mess, or other tired notions, they are only sharing common ground with the Rockefellers.

    Consider the opposite: I think we have eroded all community institutions, the notion of the public commons, the public trust, and those bodies that should defend and protect the American people. To eliminate the Department of Education, the FDA, or whatever is not the answer. The answer is to empower those institutions, make them answerable to the people and not special interests, and to increase the power of true government to COUNTER the enormous power of private interests and monopoly power.

    I don’t think I have it all figured out, but at least I don’t react with knee-jerk conditioning when I hear the word “socialism” or see the man advertised by my government as evil. Instead, I am willing to consider why the government I know to be evil is calling out an enemy. Because it just might be the case — and indeed likely — that this so-called enemy is really my friend.

    • joesigur  March 12, 2013 at 10:35 am

      Solfeggio-I find your detailed analysis of the truth movement oddly in conflict with your denial of the “jewish problem”This is all you said about jews,” the Jews are not the problem, and naming them as such will never help the cause of freedom. ” I must ask, are you aware of the jewish nature of the Russian bolshevik revolution? It was a jewish takeover, essentially. There’s a document called “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” . Jews wrote it. You know how I know that. They killed any gentile prole in Russia caught with a copy, as well as made “anti-semitism” a death penalty offense..This they did after killing off all the gentile bourgiousse, killing priests, tearing down churches, all while by passing jewish synagogues. Communism’s hate of caucasian gentiles is only matched by zionisms hate of muslim arabs-it’s all jewish-it IS the elephant in the room. Otherwise, interesting read!

    • Walking Turtle  March 19, 2013 at 5:03 pm

      Re: “detailed analysis of the truth movement oddly in conflict with…denial of the “jewish problem””


      As recent VT-analyzed events out Israel way point up, there really is a huge and growing gap between being a Jew – or Jew-ish on one hand and being a Zionist on the other. The two are emphatically not synonymous, as the growing divide between the American Temple (“synagogue”) membership and the policies of the Jerusalem Zionist regime clearly (to my own mind as well as many others) illustrate. Moreover, the well-known bigtime fundraiser and Holy Land tour-arranger “Reverend”(fnord) James Hagee – an adamant and avid Zionist if ever there was one apart from Bibi and the boyz – would surely express hot insult and start up again a-rantin’ all about his Jeezus and Double-Birthing per Gospel-based dogma if ever called “Jew” to his face, I do dare say. (Comical to imagine such a scene as that oopsie-appearing on Telly-Vision some placid Sunday in front of Just Everybody, too, ain’t it just?)

      Fact is, my own beloved Heaven-sent mentor in the Non-Faulty Intelligent Craft of Truth-gaining and -Keeping (Heaven rest him!), a hard-bitten and astute US Navy veteran of three of America’s successive military adventures-for-profit (WWII/Korea/Vietnam) was also a hereditary Ashkenaz’ (European-descended, post-Khazari capitulation) Jew – and NO Zionist at all. He clarified that specific otherwise-confusing point early-on in his Knowledge Lecture series, delivered one-on-one with NOTHING ever written-down (and our avowed enemies circling our well-armed urban industrial basement quarters cum camp, most nights), well prior to the advent of the Web. And yes, I know first-hand of his Temple affiliation – I was there when the rabbi granted him his Traditional divorce decree; he had mistakenly married a false-heart “Gentile” shiksa – a Pagan-oriented woman of covert ill-intent. The “get” document provided him that day with MUCH safety as well as peace. (He exited the building just a-dancing, he was so relieved.)

      Item of Clarity: Shiksa = “Gentile”. Goy = “cow”. (“Goyim” is the plural form.) She was indeed rather pretty of face and figure – certainly no cow by any stretch – but one ugly greedy shiksa she sure turned out to be. So there we have the difference between genuine non-judgementalist Jewish yiddishkeit> usage (in the first instance) and the malice of Zionist-grade yiddishe expression in the second, you see.

      So by definition, the problem is exactly the infandous philosophy and totalitarian sociopolitical movement – now self-defamed and -discredited, dying in the cesspool of its own filthy detritus – known the world around as “Zionism”. Spiritual Israel simply ain’t from Sheol (the grave); those death-worshippers in Jerusalem and DC are an entirely different species of creature.

      ‘Pigdogsnakes’, I tag that krue… Because they devour the Rest of Us while vomiting in our faces while they slither to suit the situation, consistently and reliably pissing down all our legs while swearing to our faces that it is just naturally raining salty on us – but not at all on them – is why..

      And that has got to be all, for now anyway. 0{:-\o[

    • NinthLive  March 14, 2013 at 12:33 am

      Solfeggio, GREAT POST. Probably the only thing I would disagree with is your wanting to empower any of the corrupt institutions that are beyond repair. When a car is so broken it can’t run, it’s time to get a new car! I’m curious though. What’s your take on Obama’s appointment of Hagel?

  17. stephanaugust  March 11, 2013 at 4:59 pm

    Here is an interesting article about “Jones’ Jewish connections”:


    • talmudawaregoyim  March 12, 2013 at 1:49 pm

      Isn’t Makow the guy who can’t say the word,”jew”?

    • matthewmccauley  March 13, 2013 at 3:58 pm

      Makow is Jewish. He is a kickass analyst who will not believe, however, that the h-caust is made up, and several other points.

  18. Brian  March 11, 2013 at 1:53 pm

    From Mike Rivero of

    WRH: “I have not made a big deal about the reasons for the move, but in a nutshell, GCN is a reflection of Alex Jones’ views of the world, and more and more our points of view regarding Israel are diverging. I get a lot of email asking why I do not challenge Alex on his defense of Israel, or asking why every time I am on his show Alex feels obligated to have a pro-Israel representative on immediately afterwards to counter the points that I made.

    I view the attack by Israel on a US flagged ship and Americans in international waters as an act of war and all who defend said attack as traitors to the USA. Alex holds a different view and I guess the breaking point was his rant in which he said that anyone who is a critic of Israel is a “weak-minded fool”. That made it a personal attack, and I decided it was time to step out of Alex’s shadow and go in a different direction.”

    • captain obvious  March 12, 2013 at 3:47 am

      his pro-Israeli comment censoring is exactly why I’d left his site behind..
      “nazis posing as jews” aka hardcore fascists posing as something religious,
      was instantly filtered never posted and I’m not “anti-semitic” in a bad way at all!
      if you copy-paste quoted from an article that had the word Jewish in it, CENSORED!
      but perfectly ok for the article itself to have that word?
      (it actually backfires to CAUSE more anti-semitism, is this deliberate?)

      terms that I use to describe, like “gay-nazi-paedo-pervs” were set up as blocked too.
      DHS-TSA love to hire those types, so did nazi Germany!
      macho-butch sadistic homo’s loved the black uniforms and power over others,
      they hated humanitarian “sissy-gays” and threw em into concentration camps,
      to wear jumpsuits with pink triangles to abuse em later, if allowed to live at all.
      Alex will rant about the same types of pervs working for child protective services,
      or how they get hired by DHS-TSA.. but dont DARE call a spade a spade in comments!

      he also supported Ron Paul in TWO fake presidential campaigns,
      where Ron raked multi-millions twice, and his voters are just marked as “dissenters”..
      Alex being (maybe unwittingly) a part of a cash cow psyop against us all.

      when the Fukushima disaster was happening, comments with anything Fuk were censored,
      was I supposed to start spelling it Fuqushima because some rookie POS set up filters?
      ultimately, Alex allowed it all, and is no longer worth my time reading or commenting.

  19. liberty1776  March 11, 2013 at 12:59 pm

    Alex jones does a lot, a lot, a lot of good. fighting against evil, tyranny, etc on many fronts. he’s human, he’s not going to get everything right. we all have blind spots & prejudices.

    • Charlotte NC Bill  March 11, 2013 at 5:59 pm

      That’s a ridiculous assertion…That’s like an electrical engineer not knowing about Ohm’s law or how a transformer works…He’s essentially worthless as a comentator…and his Jewess wife and Bronfman lawyer are probably the reason….Some of you libertarians only understand one thing: collectivism and extreme socialims are bad which leads you to think everyone on the so-called “right” is your friend…They’re not..

    • talmudawaregoyim  March 12, 2013 at 2:04 pm

      the masons do a lot of good too, to coverup all the bad of the illuminated ones

  20. Not Clueless  March 11, 2013 at 12:31 pm

    “He figured out 9/11 was an inside job before it even happened.”

    Reading that immediately brought to mind Bill Cooper who beat Alex to the 9/11 punch at least by a couple of months before. Cooper went on to declare Alex was an agent provocateur whipping up unnecessary hysteria that could cause (purposely?) serious ramifications by the government onto the citizenry. Cooper’s extensive Babylon series was my first introduction to the Assassins – Mystery Babylon (Bill Cooper) – Hour 11 and Hour 12 – The Templars and the Assassins. The transcript at this link also contains Cooper’s original NYC attack predictions:

    “Tonight folks, I come to you with a heavy heart. For another one, actually two, of my predictions…one has come true, one is about to come true. The one that has come true involve the loss of life and the injury of over five hundred people. And of course, I’m talking about the bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City. As far back as 1989, and ever since, I’ve been predicting major terrorist attacks upon the United States. The primary number one target: New York City. I have said it so many times, and so many people attending my lectures, listening to my broadcasts, and who have read my book, are familiar with it.”

    An interesting point from the same source:
    That the Crusaders knew a good deal about the Ismailis is shown from the detailed descriptions of them which survive. S. Ameer Ali, an Orientalist of considerable repute, goes further in his assessment: ‘From the Ismailis the Crusaders borrowed the conception which led to the formation of all the secret societies, religious and secular, of Europe. The institutions of Templars and Hospitallers; the Society of Jesus, founded by Ignatius Loyola, composed by a body of men whose devotion to their cause can hardly be surpassed in our time; the ferocious Dominicans, the milder Franciscans – may all be traced either to Cairo or to Alamut. The Knights Templar especially, with their system of grand masters, grand priors and religious devotees, and their degrees of initiation, bear the strongest analogy to the Eastern Ismailis.

    “[…]They were in existence before the Templars were formed: ‘The Ismailians (Assassins) was the original, and the Order of the Templars, the copy.’”
    [William Cooper]: …which it really was, as the Assassins wished to expand their control and remember, their original goal was to take over the entire world by the systematic infiltration and control of each individual country.

    “Those who think that the Assassins were fanatical Moslems, and therefore would not form any alliance with those who to them were infidels, should be reminded that to the followers of the Old Man of the Mountains only he was right, and the Saracens who were fighting the Holy War for Allah against the Crusaders were as bad as anyone else who did not accept the Assassin doctrine.”

    [William Cooper]: And it is true today: “If you are not one of us, you are nothing.” “The ends justify the means.” “The strength of our Order exists in the fact that we manifest ourselves under many different names and many different occupations, and sometimes even seem to oppose ourselves. But at the highest level, we are of one mind.”

    The more things change, the more they stay the same. We can go on and on as to whether it is Jews or Arabs at the heart of the manipulations – that just allows us to buy into the charade / the game being played – and we are so being played! One world government is already upon us – the operational system of the predator:

    “We have a predator that came from the depths of the cosmos and took over the rule of our lives. Human beings are its prisoners. The Predator is our lord and master. It has rendered us docile, helpless. If we want to protest, it suppresses our protest. If we want to act independently, it demands that we don’t do so… I have been beating around the bush all this time, insinuating to you that something is holding us prisoner. Indeed we are held prisoner!

    This was an energetic fact for the sorcerers of ancient Mexico … They took us over because we are food for them, and they squeeze us mercilessly because we are their sustenance. just as we rear chickens in chicken coops, the predators rear us in human coops, humaneros. Therefore, their food is always available to them.
    […] The predators give us their mind, which becomes our mind. The predators’ mind is baroque, contradictory, morose, filled with the fear of being discovered any minute now.
    […]Through the mind, which, after all, is their mind, the predators inject into the lives of human beings whatever is convenient for them. And they ensure, in this manner, a degree of security to act as a buffer against their fear.
    […]What I’m saying is that what we have against us is not a simple predator. It is very smart, and organized. It follows a methodical system to render us useless. Man, the magical being that he is destined to be, is no longer magical. He’s an average piece of meat.

    There are no more dreams for man but the dreams of an animal who is being raised to become a piece of meat: trite, conventional, imbecilic.”

    – Don Juan, the Mexican Yaqui Indian shaman to Carlos Castaneda – 1998

    • captain obvious  March 12, 2013 at 3:54 am

      good stuff, also brings to mind that “william cooper” or “bill cooper”
      are also censored items in Alex’ comment section,
      would about be cause to believe mr coopers assessment of jones.

  21. tm  March 11, 2013 at 12:12 pm

    D.E.B. – You didnt think Veterans Today wouldnt distort the truth to attract some readers do you?

    anyone that has paid attention to Jones and his efforts knows the article above is a ridiculous mess.

    Additionally, “Mike Adams says Hugo Chavez was “socialist.” So Mike, you want the oil majors (owned by the New World Order Zionist banksters) to steal all the oil from Venezuela and let the Venezuelan people rot in poverty?! That’s why they killed Chavez, says Greg Palast.”

    Incredibly sad effort to mix topics that even a 2 yr old could figure out arent mutually exlusive. How exactly again do comments about Mike Adams or Jones exposing a socialist agenda somehow become an endorsement for Zionists stealing oil Mr. Barrett?

    Duff, seems you need to sharpen your editor’s pencil.

    From what i have seen VT has quite the history of bludgeoning whenever it serves their interest. Jones has given his life to his efforts whether you like them or not. To distort his history of Jones efforts, like him or dislike him, is pretty pathetic.

    What exactly is the agenda of VT……hmmmmm. Wonder why VT would go so hard after those that are exposing efforts to control food, bank controlled money systems, ridiculous “wars on terror” or drugs or any other joke, vaccination and other depopulation agendas, massive arms buildup by DHS (doesnt VT care about this conversation??). Wonder why the trumpet the zionist conversation as the only conversation

    Maybe Mr. Barrett, along with the rest of VT, would be very excited about the zionist exposure from Jones since it seems your ability to round out your research is a head scratcher: – what a doozy right out fo the gate – exposing agenda to make anti-zionism a more heinous issue than anti-semitism. – 911 zionists

    Of course one could go on and on without even trying about the lack of crediblity of Barrett in this matter but why waste more time?

    ps. Wonder how many we can find that appreciates VT 100% of the time…..big yikes if there is such a person that blindly follows their efforts.

    • Gordon Duff  March 11, 2013 at 2:11 pm


      we are the only “agenda free” zone on the internet

      nothing in VT is edited or censored in any way

      no articles are altered

      no writers are given any restrictions

      none are told what to write about

      no articles are withheld because of content

    • tm  March 11, 2013 at 2:26 pm

      wonder how VT could conjure up such a truly sad article then? What do we chalk it all up to, simply ego and bravado?

    • captain obvious  March 12, 2013 at 4:27 am

      tm, I’ll sure admit Jones has done a lot of good and still does or tries to,
      he also has some holes big enough to drive a critical truck through.
      no hatred here, but feel I’ve grown past Alex’ style that started my awakening more.
      a longtime listener and reading commenter, even adminned one of his forums.
      Alex has an ego, makes many mistakes, and sure can be criticized!

    • Allesandro  March 12, 2013 at 10:20 am


      I’ve seen most everything on 9/11, written, videos, etc. at least what’s in the public domain.

      One aspect that intrigues me is what meetings were scheduled to occur at the World Trade Center Complex that day, 9/11, that were shut-down by the destruction. I had heard that there was one meeting in particular, that was high-level and involved extremely important financial matters. Is that true?

      There must be a detailed list of activities, meetings, attendees, that were set up for that day. It would be interesting to see just what was suppose to happen there, that day and who was to attend. Is this why quite a few high-ranking officials were in town that day. Why has so little attention been given to this potentially huge missing link?

      We do know that latter on that day the FED’s clearing system was pulled off-line which allowed normal protocols to be circumvented, and the clearing securities in vast sums to occur. Is that your understanding? I may have missed it but I don’t remember Alex Jones or anyone else going into real detail about these important issues on that fateful day.

      Just one other point. Isn’t it true that FEMA had a huge exercise underway at the South Sea Port, just blocks away, simulating a major disaster, and it was get this, also happening on 9/11?

      It seems they would allow, participate in our destruction and then have the FEMA brass and troops all there to help in the aftermath.

    • joesigur  March 12, 2013 at 10:54 am

      the specific areas hit on 911 were all done for financial reasons, including the oPentagon

    • captain obvious  March 12, 2013 at 12:18 pm

      a recent article here told of a financial fraud meeting being held,
      that was direct hit by the first plane, killing all with knowledge of it.

    • talmudawaregoyim  March 11, 2013 at 3:21 pm

      hmm, are you worried about Jones, or Israel-jews? You don’t come off like a Jones lover to me, but a VT hater!

    • tm  March 11, 2013 at 3:46 pm

      i am anti-nonsense regardless who the nonsense is directed. in this case particularly disappointed because its ridiculous to be dividing the crowd that both knows fairly well who our real handlers are and are actually working quite well to awaken the public at large.

      seems people are having a very hard time deciding who’s team they are playing for and letting a seemingly ever narrowing train of thought impare the view.

      divide and conquer only works ultimately for the handlers, plain and simple.which side is everyone on here? you want truth? it lies somewhere beyond the conscious mind i assure you.

      From previous:
      we are the only “agenda free” zone on the internet

      nothing in VT is edited or censored in any way

      no articles are altered

      no writers are given any restrictions

      none are told what to write about

      no articles are withheld because of content

      glaring omission to this heroic effort – accuracy. where does that rate?

      dont be part of the nonsense that divides the people. there are 7 billion of us to a few handlers. all this crap is on all of us, not the handlers. when the the 7B victims of the world realize this, it is game over for the nwo. but when you start eating one of your own you get what you get.

    • talmudawaregoyim  March 11, 2013 at 4:25 pm

      “i am anti-nonsense regardless who the nonsense is directed. in this case particularly disappointed because its ridiculous to be dividing the crowd that both knows fairly well who our real handlers are and are actually working quite well to awaken the public at large.” -Go ahead and inform us who our “real” handlers are!

    • talmudawaregoyim  March 11, 2013 at 4:28 pm

      also, we live in an era where most information is deliberate disinfo-so why are you focussing on VT?While you are at it- why was Alex Jones doing his best to remove Obama and install Romney last fall?

    • Tom D.  March 11, 2013 at 7:00 pm

      You know the point of this:AJ being “selective”. If you cannot figure that out this is pointless. VT looks at it all. Zionists are the core of the NWO if you do not have the balls to look at that. AJ dances around this all the time and it insults us. What part of Zionist NWO Pigs do you not get? It’s so simple that “artfully” dodging it make one just look dumb. That means NOT smart in case you need it spelled out.

    • captain obvious  March 12, 2013 at 4:35 am

      better question might be why he supported Ron Paul in two fake campaigns.
      Alex also contradicted himself with the romney thing a couple times,
      where obama is known and romney might blindside..
      then consider how badly nutty-yoohoo wanted rumnuts in there,
      makes for one hell of a circus!

    • Allesandro  March 12, 2013 at 10:35 am

      Good one !

    • klaatuaquinas  March 11, 2013 at 6:40 pm

      tm, grow a brain! Listen to Jack Blood (linked below) tell you the truth about Jones. He worked with him after all. I sat a table with both Jones and Blood drinking a beer with them. That is how I met Jones, via Blood. If you listen to Blood, it would appear that Jones is “pussy-whipped” in a worse kind of way. And, there is only one gender of the human species, that is most capable of that. The way Jones is lying, and continues to lie about Leo Wanta, and has yet to be unrepentant to Stew Webb, and the two staff people he fired over that, is unconscionable in my mind, and should be to all those claiming to be passionate about the truth. Jones has a lot to answer for. Being ignorant over a matter is one thing. Blatant lying is another. Alex Jones is as credible as Rush Limbaugh, as Glenn Beck. Telling “half-truths” doesn’t cut it with me. Enough said here.

    • danfer  March 12, 2013 at 8:34 pm

      Yea this is not really against zionism. I agree with you on that. And also the fact that it has shown that Alex has a history of fighting for what he believes very deeply and intensely. But that has nothing to do with his and Mike Adams talk on Chavez. I love natural news and follow a lot Mike in what he does and appreciate it. Same with Alex, I disagree on many things but use to follow him quite a bit before until I found it extremely negative and fearmongering. Now, the fact that they compared Chavez with kim jon il of North Korea is ridiculous and very ignorant of them. Chavez wasn’t a communist first off. Secondly, he helped millions get out of poverty and was a revolutionary. The picture Alex Jones and MIke Adams gives us is of revolutionary men and libertarians. They shouldn’t rant on Chavez like they did, specially Chavez being one of the few with balls out there that stood up against imperialism. So you can go ahead and donate money to Jones and add it up to his millions that he has so he can add more food to his bunker but I prefer to stand next to a “socialist” that was humble and wasn’t asking for money to millions of people so he could self benefit from it like Jones. It’s not a comparison but lately I’ve realized that Alex Jones is a bit of a hypocrite. Just watch how he mad David Icke look bad on Jesse Venturas show and then went on to say that he had nothing to do with it but on the other hand he keeps saying he’s buddies with Ventura when ventura did what he did to Icke. My respect for both of them went down there. But anyway I do agree with Barrett and unlike Alex Jones that knows one person that works for him in his studio that told him Chavez took his business, I’ve spoken with many people in Venezuela and out and it’s not what Alex says it is the way it was with Chavez. Chavez was elected 4 times cleanly with no corruption in the votes unlike almost everywhere else.
      So just don’t be a fannatic about everyone. There are hypocrites or ignorant people doing good things in some areas and good research in some things that are happening but are blinded by other really good people and leaders out there just because they don’t belong to the same party.

  22. JDB  March 11, 2013 at 11:37 am

    to be fair… AJ started the wake up about 9/11 when very few would touch it. He obviously neglected to mention the ultimate parties involved, but the rules were much different back then.

    Is it a possibility that AJ is part of a bigger operation? Was he approached in his youth by military intel? He is from Austin. Was the assignment something like: wake people up using 9/11, lead them 90% down the path, grow a very large audience with the flow of income from the zionist who try to control him…then when the time is right, tell the final 10% to an audience of tens millions or more?

    I guess we will find out…I have heard some speeches by AJ on freedom and the constitution and I can tell you at the time he made them he was quite sincere and quit aware of the bigger picture.

  23. DaveE  March 11, 2013 at 11:33 am

    I remember a conversation with a Hollywood Jew in L.A. many years ago which went something like,

    “We can make those idiots believe whatever we want them to believe. Then, if we change our minds, we can make THEM change their minds, too. It doesn’t matter if we contradict ourselves, they (stupid goyim) are too dumb to remember, anyway.”

    Seems to me that’s their game, in a nutshell. Get a show, get a lot of followers by speaking the truth most of the time BUT, at the crucial predetermined moment, change your tune to what you REALLY wanted them to believe all along.

    Oh, those clever Jews.

    Like the Masonic (Jewish) indoctrination ceremony where you get to go behind the curtain, have sex with a beautiful woman who had, moments before, been wearing a goat head, whereupon she admits, “Yeah, sucker, we REALLY worship Lucifer.”

  24. nofolalo  March 11, 2013 at 10:26 am

    It’s not my usual forte’ to address ‘people’ as to their nuances; after all we all have them.

    Two things ‘turned me off’ about Jones though, almost immediately; and, without even addressing his content.

    IMHO, Alex’s performance smacks of “schtick”. It’s his gimmick. Secondly, he attempts displays of “chutzpah”.

    Both “schtick” and “chutzpa” come form a cultural mindset alien to positive sincerity. They’re traits I eschew.

    Nuf said.

  25. mpennery  March 11, 2013 at 9:46 am

    No question it was a surprise to see Mike and Alex put down Chavez so strongly. But I try to keep things in perspective. Here’s my perspective. First, nobody gets everything right. Nobody. Not even God if you believe in him/her/it. But I’d put solid money down that you can trust Infowars (and VT) certainly more than you can trust the New York Times or any other corporate mafia media mouthpiece. I also know that in the grand scheme of things, there are two sides at conflict here: love and truth against evil and lies and I’d definitely put Veterans Today and Infowars both on the side of love and truth. Wouldn’t you? And even though the side of love and truth incredibly outnumbers the side of evil and lies, the bad guys do a masterful job at getting the good guys to fight tooth and nail against each other over their differences and in trying to be the winner of who’s more right about the bad guys and what the bad guys are doing. Instead of just banding together and easily eliminating the bad guys, of course.

    I will also say that my gut tells me that Kevin obviously doesn’t follow Mike Adams because, if he did, he’d know that Mike is a pretty informed patriot and good guy doing a lot of good work raising awareness. Mike fights against the same stupidity that Kevin does. Does that mean that we should have to agree with everything a good friend and teammate believes? That’s silly of course. So, instead of calling Mike an idiot and Alex a half idiot because you (like me) disagreed with them on their take on Chavez, how about we try to play nice and find common ground and remember we’re supposed to be on the same team here? And not expect 100% awareness and perfection from all the folks on our side? Thanks.


    • talmudawaregoyim  March 11, 2013 at 12:47 pm

      there are many signs of a jones- jewish relationship- one, last fall, was his clear effort to take out Obama

    • peter  March 11, 2013 at 4:52 pm

      Good point. If Alex Jones supported romneys mormon mafia than that’s a red flag right there.

    • tammyc  March 11, 2013 at 7:24 pm

      Actually, Alex Jones was a Ron Paul supporter. He was all over the place detailing how Paul was cheated and calling out voter fraud.

    • joesigur  March 12, 2013 at 10:58 am

      but, the last two months he ran a ton of anti Obama stuff- clearly false flagging his desire-or Israel’s desire for Romney

    • captain obvious  March 12, 2013 at 4:45 am

      I know many mormons who sure dont approve of romney at all
      (some cult followers arent THAT far gone at least!)

  26. Brian  March 11, 2013 at 9:22 am

    It’s highly likely Chavez was given cancer by the Mossad. He stated the terrorists from the Mossad are trying to kill him.

    Perhaps his Israeli handlers told him 911 was going to happen but they didn’t tell him 911 would be an Israeli operation.

    Like Obama in the Pink House I think Jones is an Israeli stooge. He’s probably received death threats from the Mossad about speaking the truth about 911.

    • Brian  March 11, 2013 at 9:35 am

      It not just Alex Jones, there are many others, excerpt from an article:

      Webster Tarpley has been a central figure in the Kosher truth movement, and wrote a book called 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in the USA. Tarpley is a firm supporter of the Kosher version of the truth which is that Bush & Cheney orchestrated 9/11; nary a mention does he make to Israel and the Jews in his work and writings.

      Tarpley has made numerous appearances on Jewish controlled mainsteam media networks CNN, FOX, and NBC. Getting on mainstream media is a clear sign that the Jews approve of his message.

      Luke Rudkowski & We Are Change

      One of the most publicized figures in the 9/11 truth movement has been Luke Rudkowski and his organization We Are Change, Rudkowski is a Jew who was one of the key figures that distracted the world for the past 4-5 years, by bull horning “9/11 was an inside job” all day long.

      Harrassing politicians about their attendance at Bilderberg Group meetings, this clown is known to ban people from his website who dare mention the Jews, and is a close associate of Alex Jones and Loosechange, both disinfo agents of the Jews, he fits right in.

      This Jewish controlled dissent power structure is composed of Alex Jones at the head with Loose Change & We Are Change as the two wings. Below them are the hordes of brainwashed fanboy minions who absorb anything the aforementioned shills can conjure, and then parrot this contrived malarkey to unsuspecting cattle.

      Brian: Israel did 911.

    • Allesandro  March 12, 2013 at 10:52 am


      True, and look what happened to people like Rosie O’Donnell, Ed Asner, Charlie Sheen and others that started going OFF-SCRIPT, we never hear from them again. So your point about the “message” they want to get through does, and the others go into exile. Seems to make sense.

    • Brian  March 11, 2013 at 9:39 am

      It not just Alex Jones, there are many others, excerpts from an article:

      Webster Tarpley has been a central figure in the Kosher truth movement, and wrote a book called 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in the USA. Tarpley is a firm supporter of the Kosher version of the truth which is that Bush & Cheney orchestrated 9/11; nary a mention does he make to Israel and the Jews in his work and writings.

      Tarpley has made numerous appearances on Jewish controlled mainsteam media networks CNN, FOX, and NBC. Getting on mainstream media is a clear sign that the Jews approve of his message.

      Luke Rudkowski & We Are Change

      One of the most publicized figures in the 9/11 truth movement has been Luke Rudkowski and his organization We Are Change, Rudkowski is a Jew who was one of the key figures that distracted the world for the past 4-5 years, by bull horning “9/11 was an inside job” all day long.

      This Jewish controlled dissent power structure is composed of Alex Jones at the head with Loose Change & We Are Change as the two wings. Below them are the hordes of brainwashed fanboy minions who absorb anything the aforementioned shills can conjure, and then parrot this contrived malarkey to unsuspecting cattle.

      Brian: The Israeli government did 911.

    • mpennery  March 11, 2013 at 9:57 am

      Yet here’s the rub…I believe you can know AJ is one of the jewish gatekeepers and still find great value in his work. He raises awareness about hundreds of other important issues and even if he has a secretive agenda, you can’t say that about all his guests. He really does bring some good folks on there. I know AJ never lets his rants take you to the top of the power structure but by waking up millions of people to so many other issues, his listeners are more likely to get there on their own anyway. jmho

    • talmudawaregoyim  March 11, 2013 at 12:51 pm

      and if someone gets to honest about Israel and the jews-they don’t get back on!It’s great to know we got a problems, but is it great to be told it’s everywhere it ain”t?

    • Charlotte NC Bill  March 11, 2013 at 6:15 pm

      Listen up: Talmudia and the cabalists who own the Fed/Bank of England and all their whole rogue network are the Synagogue of Satan and the epi-center of evil in the world…if you’re soft on them….you’re less than worthless.

    • nofolalo  March 11, 2013 at 6:36 pm

      Mixed emotions? Ambiguity?

      “To be, or not to be, that is the question”…W. Shakespeare

      The comments, on his all his ‘comments sections’ says a lot about his ‘effect’.

      “The effect, is the intent” !

    • Allesandro  March 12, 2013 at 10:57 am


      He let Jesse Ventura on and gave him plenty of Lee-way, so that counts for something.

    • joesigur  March 12, 2013 at 11:01 am

      narcissists love fellow narcissists .:)

    • NavyBrat  March 12, 2013 at 5:17 pm

      As with any good dis-info site, most of it must be true for the dis-info to be accepted. You just have to trust your internal BS meter while reading. That goes for ALL info from anywhere.

      Ever since 9-11, I have had more conversations about that event than I can ever remember. The most important thing to do is gauge what someone’s level of awareness is. They must be led to the truth, not bludgeoned with it.

      Casually bringing up pre-911 put options, explosions in the Towers heard by the NYPD & FD, and the PBS interview with Larry Silverstein on You Tube is usually enough to point them in the right direction. When they’ve had time to digest that much, then they are ready for the “5 Dancing Israelis” video. Steer clear of Pod planes/Missiles/Thermite etc. These, some of which may be valid points, are ultimately red herrings.

      People are much more likely to hold to the truth if they think they’ve discovered it themselves.

    • talmudawaregoyim  March 11, 2013 at 12:49 pm

      ultimately, if there is a price to pay for 911- the effort will be to deflect it down to the masons

    • talmudawaregoyim  March 11, 2013 at 1:28 pm

      during the French Revolution, many masons became expendable and cannon fodder for one reason or another-if they become inconvenient, they get taken out-the protocols substantiates this tactic a hundred years later

    • nofolalo  March 11, 2013 at 6:28 pm

      I’m not a ‘mason’, a fan, or a sympathizer to their fraternal perspective: but, as an educated observer, I believe they, along with; the Papacy, the Jesuits, the Black Nobility, the Nazi’s, and ‘Aliens’, and ‘others’, have been used as rhetorical patsys by the genuine culprits.

    • Charlotte NC Bill  March 11, 2013 at 6:09 pm

      Great…we’re all afraid to die and they don’t mind killing us….and we never effectively fight back….

    • nofolalo  March 11, 2013 at 6:42 pm

      Because, “we’re all afraid to die”, and, we might get killed (or worse) in the process.

    • nofolalo  March 11, 2013 at 6:47 pm

      If you can come up with a way to break the cycle, you win.

    • NavyBrat  March 12, 2013 at 5:51 pm

      There is a way to break the cycle. The most important teaching of Jesus (stay with me on this – I’m not recruiting here …) was that death is NOT the end of our existence. This is why he posed such a threat to them. Their control over us is fear of death. Without that they have nothing. This is why they promote nihilism, atheism etc. It’s good for business. We buy stuff to avert our gaze from the Grim Reaper. That’s why skulls/death’s heads are a major feature in subliminal advertizing – ice cubes in alcohol ads etc.

      In the old days, public executions were a way of re-enforcing this. Now they use TV shows and movies. Ever wondered about the proliferation of cop/secret agent shows? It’s all about control – the subliminal message being “this is what you get if you don’t obey…. and even then, you might be sitting in a movie theater or in a mall with your family and – ka-BOOM!”

      All our sins derive from our fear of death. Think about that for a moment. Every sin you can name ultimately has its root in our fear of death.

    • wolf  March 12, 2013 at 6:14 pm

      Great comment NB

  27. klaatuaquinas  March 11, 2013 at 9:17 am

    Dr. Barrett, you need to listen to this by Jack Blood. I met Jones via Blood, at an event sponsored by Blood in Austin. Needless to say, I enjoyed my time with Blood far more than Jones. And, spent more time with Blood than Jones. I have listened to Jones since his days of access cable (before the internet and WWW). Jones is not very approachable by most. He is basically a Rush Limbaugh, who claims to love heavy metal (knows personally Dave Mustaine), and actually allows guests on his show, but doesn’t let them talk as much as him.

    I wish to give (and have given thus) Jones all the benefit of doubt. However, his last straw with me was over Leo Wanta. I share directly with Marilyn Barnewall, what Jones said about Wanta. Barnewall said back to me that Jones is either a most blatant and grievous liar, or one willfully ignorant person.

    Jack Blood – The Ugly Truth About Alex Jones

    Gordon Duff Proves Alex Jones a Liar!

    • captain obvious  March 12, 2013 at 5:00 am

      very familiar with the falling out of Jack and Alex, personally, I believe Jack about it!
      from powermad megalomania to fake autographs being sent out on DVD’s..
      Jack used to fill in for Alex, and I can relate to Jack’s mannerisms with the infowar,
      tells it straight, isnt trying to cause heart attacks, laughs at the fascist POS “elite”.
      Jack also told it how Alex’ wifee wears the pants a lot, go figger..

    • talmudawaregoyim  March 12, 2013 at 2:38 pm

      this nsearch dude is questionable himself-judging by some of his sources and his messia complex- what a rant!I wonder if he still plugs Santilli!

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network