Google, Beyond the CIA: Insurgency and Espionage Factory

Google, Beyond the CIA:  Insurgency and Espionage Factory


By Gordon Duff and Press TV


Intercepted emails expose Google as an intelligence contractor openly involved in aiding terror organizations throughout Africa, Asia and the world, working well outside any official oversight and authority, far beyond even the CIA’s wildest abuses.

STRATFOR, in an email exchange says this of Google:

“GOOGLE is getting White House and State Department support & air cover. In reality, they are doing things the CIA cannot do. But, I agree with you. He’s going to get himself kidnapped or killed. Might be the best thing to happen to expose Google’s covert role in foaming up-risings, to be blunt. The US Gov. can then disavow knowledge and GOOGLE is left holding the (expletive deleted) bag.”

Among the STRATFOR emails Wikileaks received were some exposing Google as, not just an intelligence contractor for the CIA and Department of Defense but foreign governments as well.

Text within the highly sensitive cables outlines criminal and even terrorist activities on the part of Google including the planning of insurgency operations.  Sources have confirmed Google has helped plan military operations against Syria and has been directly involved, working with Arab states, Turkey and Azerbaijan to plan destabilization of Iran.

Emails expose meetings between Google executives and insurgency groups in Azerbaijan operating against Iran.

Under the front name of “Google Ideas Groups,” with support including “air cover,” authorized by the White House and State Department, Google Corporation is directly involved in planning terror attacks.

Wikileaks intercepted STRATFOR emails outlining Google operations in planning insurgencies and illegally conduction both foreign policy and espionage.

Re: GOOGLE & Iran ** internal use only – pls do not forward **

Released on 2012-03-14 22:00 GMT

Email-ID 1121800

Date 2011-02-27 15:31:56

From [email protected]

To [email protected], [email protected]

GOOGLE is getting White House and State Department support & air cover. In reality, they are doing things the CIA cannot do. But, I agree with you. He’s going to get himself kidnapped or killed.

Might be the best thing to happen to expose Google’s covert role in foaming up-risings, to be blunt. The US Gov. can then disavow knowledge and GOOGLE is left holding the (expletive-deleted) bag.

Scott Stewart wrote:

Cohen might end up having an accident if he is not careful. This is not child’s play.

> —–Original Message—–

> From: Fred Burton [mailto:[email protected]]

> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 9:28 AM

> To: Secure List

> Subject: GOOGLE & Iran ** internal use only – pls do not forward **


> ** Extracted from an internal email to a senior Google Executive. The msg is from Jared Cohen (the former policy appointee @ State) and discusses Cohen’s plans on meeting w/Iranians (note: anti-government insurgents).

I wanted to follow-up and get a sense of your latest thinking on the proposed March trip to UAE, Azerbaijan, and Turkey. The purpose of this trip is to exclusively engage the Iranian community to better understand the challenges faced by Iranians as part of one of our Google Ideas groups on repressive societies.

Here is what we are thinking:

Drive to Azerbaijan/Iranian border and engage the Iranian communities closer to the border (this is important because we need the Azeri Iranian perspective)”

Google had long been criticized for selling “keyword intercepts” from Gmail accounts to advertisers.  However, it has long been known that, not only does Google go much further, scanning emails for intelligence, both security related and corporate, but there is no clear accounting of who Google’s clients are.

Sources indicate that Google sells email and search related intercepts to governments like China, Vietnam, North Korea and others.

Additionally, Google has been proven to accept payment for suppressing searches of news stories clients find embarrassing, to push conspiracies, to support hate groups, to work in smear campaigns and now, of course, is exposed as having armed personnel working directly with insurgents in direct violation of international law.


Google Corporation has systematically represented key core aspects of their business model, intelligence gathering and security contracting.  Certainly, there has been no mention of terrorism and espionage, activities “outed” by STRATFOR and Wikileaks.

From Google’s investor relations site:

“We believe in the importance of building stockholder trust. We adhere to the highest levels of ethical business practices, as embodied by the Google Code of Conduct, which provides guidelines for ethical conduct by our directors, officers and employees.”

Nothing in any Google publication indicates that employees are involved in illegal covert operations that fall within the ICC’s definition of “war crimes.”

When STRATFOR, as outlined above, says the following of Google employees:

“He’s going to get himself kidnapped or killed…Cohen might end up having an accident if he is not careful. This is not child’s play.”

This is a well-known and respected private intelligence contractor’s assessment of the price Google can expect its employees to pay for involvement in “foaming up-risings.”

Not one Google stockholder, many of whom are institutional investors or individuals who would never own stock in a company involved in war crimes or who are legally prohibited from doing so, has been informed of the activities they are backing.

MK “Google Ultra”

Top intelligence and security personnel now warn that, not only the use of Gmail accounts but even the Google search engine including derivative engines like AOL Search and others can place users in quite real danger.

All information passing through Google, including use of Google Voice, Google Groups, Gmail, Google Search, Google Talk and every other corporate platform is gleaned, not just for intelligence but subjected to sophisticated algorithms.

Profiles created are designed to predict behavior, interpret possible threats and target with information crafted to play on fears and vulnerabilities in control economic, political and social activities of the individual.

We could call it “Google slavery.”

Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:

All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within this post are the full responsibility of the author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on April 10, 2013, With 5375 Reads Filed under Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

11 Responses to "Google, Beyond the CIA: Insurgency and Espionage Factory"

  1. MK  April 11, 2013 at 9:47 pm

    This is why I use Yahoo, Beaucoup and offshore search engines.

  2. Tom D.  April 11, 2013 at 6:24 pm

    Google is part and parcel of the Globalist Zionist Kabal. See “John Coleman on The Committee of 300”. Search him on You two ube. This is our Globalist Ziorganization. City of London, Duch East India Black Nobility Rothschild Pile of Shite.
    Gordon hits a home run!

  3. Martin Maloney  April 11, 2013 at 3:53 pm

    To anyone who is concerned about his privacy, stop using Google.

    Visit To the right of the search bar, click on Details. A box pops up; read it.

    They pass search inquiries to Google, stripped of the originating IP. They also do not record your IP or your search inquiry. In short, Google’s record of the search inquiry cannot be tracked back to the originating IP.

    That is what StartPage claims. I have no way of checking their claims.

    Some searches might constitute a red flag to the authorities, and Google might pass such inquiries and their originating IP to the authorities. If StartPage is being truthful, then Google is prevented from doing that. If StartPage is lying, then you’re no worse off than if you used Google directly.

    To me, using StartPage makes sense.

    • sandyhooked  April 11, 2013 at 4:28 pm

      I tried using Startpage as an alternative to google. I did not like it and removed it. I think there are numerous problems with it. Since it is recommended by Alex Jones and his crew I came to believe it is another Zionist Israelis info gathering trick. Since they already control google – I think it is a fake alternative just like Alex Jones’s Pro Cointel operation is. Just my opinion.

      Here is site showing some problems with

      When it comes to the internet it has been taken over and dominated and in many ways ruined by google with yahoo and bing as your only real alternatives. Neither of which are any good either. Just try to do a search for something these days and all you get is commercial crap that has nothing to do with what your looking for. Companies paying for search results.

  4. stephanaugust  April 11, 2013 at 3:31 pm

    I do not believe that a business like Google can survive by making profit. Why is there no competition?

  5. nigelisok  April 11, 2013 at 3:22 pm

    Gordon, lots of charges on the oblique here. Did I simply just miss any smoking guns? Seems to me there are lots of folks talking “about” the Big G (all of whom have plenty of reason to besmirch our Silicon Valley lads). Were Larry or, far less likely, Serge caught red-Gmailed, as it were? If so, could you send that along in a follow-up post?
    The corporate behaviour you limn in this piece sounds 180-out from the same firm that turned its back on its $400-500 million market share in China and relocated its Asian ops to Hong Kong, on “principle,” (Serge’s, in the account I read) when all the other major search engines had folded like cheap suits in the face of Sino government intimidation.
    Should I put it down to mere cointel that the Big G is the only (or one of the very few) major data aggregation ops to voluntarily reveal its rate of Federal requests/denials for info? How clever.
    Could it be you are describing the very same firm that designed it initial IPO to give the little guy a chance to buy in (greed and cunning prevailed, but the sentiment was there) and set up a to be funded by 1% of gross receipts to put toward eleemosynary projects like 100Meg broadband at Macy’s bargain basement prices, a venture over which no other common stockholder has a say, as market shares stipulate that no such input (or manipulation for profit) would be allowed?
    That Google?
    As your piece reads as though Google now sits on the right hand of Satan (a fairly crowded piece of real estate in these times, you must admit), a proof-positive link of G’s transmogrification since its founding would be greatly appreciated. Or is there, like our beloved CIA, a bad Google and a good Google.
    As Lily once joked, “I’m trying to be cynical, but it’s hard to keep up.”
    Thanx for the great columns,

    • Gordon Duff  April 12, 2013 at 6:28 am

      The smoking gun is here…but not written at Fox News reading level.

  6. JS  April 11, 2013 at 6:19 am

    Noted about Google, none of which surprises me.

  7. Preston James, Ph.D  April 10, 2013 at 2:41 pm

    Excellent article. Gordon Duff once again hits the nail on the head 100% and stays on the cutting edge of such disclosures. It can no longer be denied that google is little more than an American intel proprietary, just another deniable cutout used to do Intel’s dirtywork. This is now standard tradecraft and such proprietaries are allowed to sell anytghiong and everything all over the world as a part of a higher level NWO Globalist policy of creating and spreading maximum chaos, needed to generate the PTB new world dictatorship and their new Caesar of the Ages. And of course when the time is right and their mission is done, google will become fully exposed and become the badguy to be disposed on the trash heap of history where it belongs. And yes, this can be a dangerous game when communication companies presenting themselves as harmless social tools are vicious tools of intel, both domestic and foreign. And another topic for examination is who really owns and control google. Is it foreign based, foreign owned and foreign controlled, just another enemy within stealing personal information and selling it all over the world often to enemies of the American people?

  8. Allesandro  April 10, 2013 at 1:25 pm

    It’s something how Google so quickly emerged as the frontrunner search engine, not so long ago. When you consider the competition they had, it doesn’t make sense, unless of course they had a lot of hidden promotion, assistance,money,protection and subversion of the competition.

    It’s sort of like Facebook, a goldmine for intelligence gathering that the public at large does not suspect.. Two peas from the same pod.

  9. mcfadden  April 10, 2013 at 12:39 pm

    Joogle? Joogle is Zion?

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network