The Jewification Process Through Arts, Films, and Movies (Part II)



“Our way must be: never knowingly support lies! having understood where the lies begin—step back from that gangrenous edge! Let us not glue back the flaking scale of the Ideology, not gather back its crumbling bones, nor patch together its decomposing garb, and we will be amazed how swiftly and helplessly the lies will fall away, and that which is destined to be naked will be exposed as such to the world.”—Alexander Solzhenitsyn[1]


…by Jonas E. Alexis


Stan Lee

Will Eisner, Jack Kirby, Bob Kane, Stan Lee, Joe Simon, Marvin A. Wolfman, and a host of other comic book writers and artists revolutionized the superhero genre. In fact, the comic book industry in America was exclusively a Jewish creation.[2]

For Abe Novick of the Jerusalem Post, that Superman “is Jewish or not shouldn’t even be questioned.”[3] For the Jewish Daily Forward, “Superman is Jewish.”[4]

One can say the same thing about France as well, with Jewish artists like Joann Sfar, Lewis Trondheim (Laurent Chabosy), and others leading the comic book scene. Sfar talks about “the influences of the philosophers Nietzsche and Levinas on his work” and declares, “I’m more of a Talmudist than a kabbalist.”[5]

E. Michael Jones suggests that the Jews’ introduction of supermen in comic books is important because Jews like Jerry Siegel and Joe Schuster, who created the superman idea, “couldn’t expunge the idea of a Messiah from their consciousness.”[6]

This sentiment makes sense when you consider that Jewish director Richard Donner, who became famous for directing the first Superman movie (1978), claimed that Jesus was “the ultimate Super Jew of his day.”[7]

Jewish writers Christopher Knowles and Joseph Michael Linsner have noted that many of the superheroes—if not all—were conceived as a form of Messiah, in essence, “the new Christ.”[8]

Just like Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection are the turning point in Christian history, the superhero’s “death is the salvation of mankind.”[9] More recently, Man of Steel director Jack Snyder declares,

I think the relationship between Jesus and Superman is not a thing we invented in this film, it is a thing that has been talked about since the creation of Superman…”[10]

In Christology, Christ had to die to save humanity. Since Jews couldn’t expunge Christ from their memory, superheroes have to die to save humanity. We see this in the 2006 movie Superman Returns, where the superhero metaphorically dies and is resurrected to save humanity.

This same metaphor is used somewhat derisively in Spider-man 2 after the hero saves a passenger train. One could also argue that this theme appears in the 2011 movie Thor. Man of Steel is no different.

In an article entitled “Superman as Christ-Figure: The American Pop Culture Movie Messiah,” Jewish writer Anton Karl Kozlovic declared,

“Theologically speaking, the corporeal nature of Jesus is itself a sacred sign. The need for a deliverer ‘is expressed in the biblical messianic hope that God would send his Messiah in the form of a single human being, a person just like us, who could speak to us and show us, through human words and deeds, the way to the truth and the life.’

“Superman was the fictional, secular equivalent of that sacred hope…The title-cum-name ‘Superman’ was also equivalent to Jesus’s title-cum-name ‘Christ.’” Jesus began his earthly ministry at age thirty; “at age thirty, Superman flew out with ‘a clear idea of his messianic mission to battle evil and save Earth from its own foolishness.”[11]

Throughout the article Kozlovic compares Superman to Christ, ignorant of the fact that the concept of the superhero is part of a larger ideological/Talmudic theme. But Superman or any other superhero is nothing but a cheap counterfeit of what Christ represents.

One writer goes so far as to say that “‘for good or ill, the Jewish style, with its heavy reliance upon Yiddish Yiddishisms, has emerged not only as a comic style, but as the prevailing comic style.’ The result…was ‘the new life for American culture.’”[12]

Jewish scholar Ted Merwin admits that “because Jewish producers, actors, comics, and composers dominated the field of entertainment, New York Jewish culture had a disproportionate effect on American culture.”[13] To quote Merwin’s book title, the Jews have shaped America In Their Own Image.

In other words, this “new Christ” is not the suffering Christ as portrayed in the New Testament, but the “anti-Christ” or anti-Logos. As E. Michael Jones puts it after the release of The Dark Knight Rises,

“The Jewish superhero is also the Antichrist. The Jews rejected Christ because he was not a powerful military leader who would restore the Kingdom by military might as David had done. The Jewish Messiah is, in other words, Superman, which is to say a caricature of the real Messiah that they rejected.

“The superhero is the Jewish Messiah who brings about tikkun olam, the healing of the world, at a time of economic crisis, but in a non-communist way that did not jeopardize his standing as a good American.”[14]

In a nutshell, Jewish comic book writers quickly picked up a new way to replace the suffering Christ with “the new Christ,” the Talmudic Christ.

Like Freud, who used psychoanalysis as a pretext to attack Christianity and Western values, comic book writers promote their agendas under the guise of fiction and art. This is not my words. In 1954, Jewish psychologist Frederic Wertham realized that comic books were having an enormously negative influence on the lives of young people and directed a frontal attack against the genre in his seven-year study Seduction of the Innocent.[15]

MAD magazine, created by Harvey Kurtzman, which decades later became a very popular TV show, was allegedly creating panic by “desecrating Christmas.”[16]

Now the issue is no longer limited to the desecration of Christmas, but the abolition of Logos in the culture war and in movies.

Frank Miller, a Jewish comic book writer and film director, talks about “a clash of civilizations” and how “superheroes should be front and center.” He even believes that Jewish comic book writers like himself should use their medium as “the biggest megaphone” and blatantly states, “I am out to provoke.”[17]

In other words, comic books and films, for Miller, are weapons.

Frank Miller

Peter Sanderson of Publishers Weekly writes that Miller “pointed out all the major superheroes of the 1940s were created by Jews during a time of anti-Semitic persecution: ‘Superman was golem.’ And while he said that he ‘won’t tell Jeff Smith that Bone has got to [go on a political] crusade,’ Miller nonetheless issued a call to his fellow comics pros: ‘Let’s revive our tradition and get back on the job.’”[18]

In Jewish folklore, a golem is a Frankensteinian monster brought to life to strike out at all perceived enemies of the Jewish people. The New Jewish Encyclopedia

declares that this inanimate character can be

“given artificial life with the aid of magic or the use of a Divine name…The concept of the Golem as an artificially created human being by supernatural means was widely accepted during the Middle Ages.

“According to the legend, the most famous Golem was created in the 16th century by Judah Low of Prague, one of the great rabbis. The express purpose of these living automatons was to protect the Jews from menacing dangers…Jewish folklore has numerous Golem stories, and several modern literary works have been written on that theme.”[19]

Jewish professor Alon Raab tells us that “the Golem never failed to come to the rescue of his people when danger lurked, battling everyone from Yasser Arafat to space invaders.”[20]

Eleventh-century Talmudic scholar Rashi taught that “the golem was created by combining the letters of God’s name as revealed in the Sefer Yetzira [Book of Creation] a seminal kabbalistic text written between the third and sixth centuries C.E.”[21]

The theme of the golem has been used prominently in the work of Jewish comic book writers Uri Fink and Eli Eshed. Raab continues:

“Fink recreates the newspapers and journals of Israel across the decades, each with its unique style of graphic representation—primitive designs and fonts included—while interpolating characters into actual historical photos and paintings in a way that would make the best Stalinist artists proud.”[22]

Golem is the main theme behind Superman. Let you doubt the accuracy of this statement, listen to Larry Tye of the Jewish Daily Forward: “Superman’s creator, Jerry Siegel, acknowledges in an unpublished memoir that he was strongly influenced by anti-Semitism he saw and felt, and that Samson was a role model for Superman.[23]

Tye continues: “The explosion of Krypton conjures up images from the mystical Kabbalah where the divine vessel was shattered and Jews were called on to perform tikkun olam, repairing the vessel and the world. No one did more of that than the Man From Metropolis.”[24]

Then Tye drops the Jewish bomb: Superman is “as indestructible as The Golem — and an inspiration to every Jewish schlump who knew there was a super being inside him.”[25]
A recent incarnation of the golem theme is found in the 2008 blockbuster movie Iron Man (and its 2010 sequel), which was written in part by Stan Lee and directed and produced by Jewish filmmaker Jon Favreau. Zack Snyder reboosts this theme with the release of Man of Steel, produced by Christopher Nolan and David S. Goyer, two individuals we shall meet in the next article.

 Frank Miller and Golem

This theme of the golem wreaking havoc on all enemies has emboldened Frank Miller and other comic book writers to provoke anything they perceive as a threat to the Jewish people. Journalist Geoff Boucher writes,

“Much has been made of Miller’s politics in the wake of ‘300.’ The deliriously violent and stylized sword film is based on a Spartan battle in 480 B.C., and although Miller wrote and drew the story for Dark Horse comics a decade ago, in film form it was received by many as a grotesque parody of the ancient Persians and a fetish piece for a war on Islam. Miller scoffs at these notions. ‘I think it’s ridiculous that we set aside certain groups and say that we can’t risk offending their ancestors. Please.’”[26]

Great! If Miller truly believes this, he then should help us destabilize the political power of the Jewish police state around the world. Why should decent Germans be put to prison if they just dare to raise a question about the “Holocaust”? Just a quick example here.

Germar Rudolf

 Germar Rudolf was a German chemist who was working at the famous Max Plank Institute and believed in the gas chamber story until he went to examine the sites as a chemist himself. When he came out, he began to question some of the views he had previously held. His mistake was that he made his voice heard, and he not only had his Ph.D. denied, but lost his job and had to flee Germany in order to avoid prison time.

After he fled to Spain and England, he settled in the United States, where he eventually got married. During his absence, criminal charges were piled up against him in Germany for the same reason, and he was denied political asylum.

Even after he married and had a child, he was deported to Germany to be imprisoned for, among other things, “disparaging the dead”! (Germar needs to send a letter to Miller.)

Rudolf ’s documents were eventually “confiscated and ordered to be destroyed, that is to say: burned in waste incinerators under police supervision.”[27] Rudolf was released from prison in the summer of 2009.

Miller sees Islam as a threat to the West and thinks that using his graphic skills to make fun of Islam is appropriate.

But what if people treated Judaism and the Talmud the same way? Would Miller feel so cavalier then? I don’t think so; there would be a loud outcry about anti-Semitism. Can Miller explain this phenomenon?

If he does not agree with Talmudic teachings, then why doesn’t he devote equal amounts of time to ridiculing Talmudic theology which has been a central force for evil in the West and in the Middle East?

The simple fact is that Miller’s work, like that of Stan Lee, Bob Kane, Joe Shuster, and others, is indirectly Talmudic by a process of osmosis. Miller’s dedication to taking down anything he sees as a threat to Judaism is revealed throughout his work, especially in his graphic novel Sin City, which he brought to the big screen in 2005 in collaboration with Robert Rodriguez (director of El Mariachi and Desperado) and Quentin Tarantino.

Both the book and the movie are laden with nudity, pornography, and pervasive, graphic violence. Miller is right: he is out to provoke.

But Miller’s provocation in Sin City is most often aimed at the Catholic Church and Western values. Sin City depicts Christianity as synonymous with the most evil entity ever. One reviewer remarked, “Crosses and Bibles appear in numerous scenes—and without fail they’re associated with death and depravity.”[28]

The overarching message from Sin City is that using graphic violence, anti-heroes and prostitutes win their own wars against the moral order.

Yet the movie isn’t really intended to connect with its viewers. Manohla Dargis of the New York Times writes that the directors’ “commitment to absolute unreality and the absence of the human factor mean it’s hard to get pulled into the story on any level other than the visceral. When stuff goes blam, you jump like someone who’s landed on a whoopee cushion. But then you just sit there, wrap yourself in the dark and try not to fall asleep.”[29]

Producers and directors have used this approach for years. For example, Menahem Golan, an Israeli producer and director who first became famous in the 1980s, made a career writing, directing, and producing films such as The Delta Force (starring Chuck Norris), which uses heroic American soldiers saving a hijacked plane to convey to the American people how evil the Lebanese government is and how much they hate Americans and Jews.

It is no accident that Golan, who often used the pen name Joseph Goldman, was a pilot in the Israeli Air Force during the Israeli War of Independence (1948-1949).

Golan was the third owner of the now defunct Hollywood film company the Cannon Group, which he once ran with his cousin Yoram Globus.

During the 1980s, the Cannon Group produced many Soviet-style propaganda movies such as Avenging Force, starring Michael Dudikoff, in which right wingers are portrayed as neo-Nazis and racists. The leader of the gang extols Hitler as “a visionary,” and says that Darwinian principle is what keeps the gang alive: “Survival of the fittest, that’s what counts. That’s why we rule and always will.”

 Some American isolationists in the 1930s argued that Jews would use the media

to portray Germany in the same light.[30] Fast-forward to 1996, when Jewish producer Joel Schumacher directed the law thriller A Time to Kill, which portrays

whites as rednecks, criminals, and looters, with blacks as their victims.

After the Bar Kochba rebellion, which ended around 135-136 A.D., the revolutionary Jew figured out that military power wasn’t a guarantee of victory. Of that event, Jewish historian Solomon Grayzel writes,

“The first choice, the way of the sword for keeping the Jews alive as a group, had failed. The second choice, the way of the spirit, was now entered upon with enthusiasm.”[31]

The way of the spirit is implanting ideology and comic books, films and blockbuster movies, which can have far more devastating consequences than the way of the sword.

On the whole, Jewish revolutionaries have found spiritual and mental warfare to be much more effective than the sword. While their strategies have been updated, “the animus against Christianity” remains the same.[32]

 Whether it is in movies or comic books, through the power of the written word or the power of visual images, Jewish revolutionaries directly or indirectly attacked Logos and Western culture.

Christianity, as we shall see later, is one of the main pillars of Western Culture, and if it can be undermined, then the West will eventually crumble. The attacks against it over the past eighty years or so have been extremely powerful and effective in movies.

Miller describes his new comic book Holy Terror: Batman! as “a piece of propaganda.”[33] Revolutionary/Talmudic ideas lead to graphic novels; graphic novels lead to movies; movies lead to propaganda; and propaganda invariably leads to the change of culture and thought.

George Lucas unapologetically acknowledged this years ago at the University of Southern California. He said:

“film and visual entertainment are a pervasively important part of our culture, an extremely significant influence on the way our society operates. People in the film industry don’t want to accept the responsibility that they had a hand in the way the world is loused up. But, for better or worse, the influence of the church, which used to be all-powerful, has been usurped by film. Film and television tell us the way we conduct our lives, what is right and wrong.”[34]

As Jewish ascendency became the norm in Hollywood, the American culture had changed. Quoting Jewish scholar Murray Friedman, Jones writes:

George Lucas

“The Jews transformed American society after World War II, remaking it in their image. The older generations of Protestant novelists and poets, many of whom—e.g., T. S. Eliot and Ezra Pound—had serious reservations about modernity even though their writing was ‘modern’ in form, were replaced by almost exclusively Jewish writers.

“Ernest Hemingway, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ezra Pound, and T. S. Eliot, who came to prominence in the ‘20s, were replaced in the ‘50s by Saul Bellow, Aaron Copland, Leonard Bernstein, Philip Roth, J. D. Salinger, Norman Mailer, Arthur Miller, German Wouk, Bernard Malamud, and Alan Ginsberg. Leslie Fiedler called it ‘the great takeover by Jewish American writers.’ Friedman says the Jews not only wrote books, they also ‘taught Americans how to dance (Arthur Murray), how to behave (Dear Abby and Ann

Landers), how to dress (Ralph Lauren), what to read (Irving Howe, Alfred Kazin and Lionel Trilling), and what to sing (Irving Berlin, Barry Manilow, Barbara Streisand).’”[35]

Scholars like David A. Hollinger saw that the same thing was happening in university departments. He writes:

“By the early 1960s the large number of Jews in sociology led to faculty-club banter to the effect that sociology had become a Jewish discipline. In the literary world the triumph of Norman Mailer, Saul Below, and J. D. Salinger led Leslie Fiedler to hail ‘the great take-over by Jewish-American writers’ of a task ‘inherited from certain Gentile predecessors, urban Anglo-Saxons and Midwestern provincials of North European origin.”[36]

Hollinger of course minimized the Jewish de-Christianization of America and their take-over of intellectual life and academics, but he could not help but note that when they took over the social sciences, “Religion was increasingly private, and public discussion was increasingly secular.”[37]

Murray Friedman

What’s more, “the open profession of Christian belief in the course of one’s professional work is uniquely discouraged.”[38]

Seen in its proper context, the de-Christianization of America was essentially a Jewish movement that had deep roots in Jewish revolutionary/Talmudic activity. Hollinger does not say this explicitly because it seems he does not like the implications of this deduction.

Instead he states, “Any account of how Jews contributed to the diminution of Christianity’s influence could be construed as a criticism of Jews, and as a grist for the mill of T. S. Eliot’s ideological descendants. But this historiographical inhibition disappears if we believe, instead, that whatever may be wrong with American universities, and with America, it is not that they are insufficiently Christian.”[39]

Yet Jewish historian Murray Friedman could have helped Hollinger here. Friedman writes in his widely read study The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy:

Jewish groups had come to play a critical role in the ‘de-Christianization’ of American culture.”[40] They “had successfully challenged Bible reading in the public schools and any form of state aid to parochial schools.

“So dominant had the ‘separatist’ view become that even a nonsectarian prayer prepared by the New York Regents Board in 1962 was ruled by the Supreme Court in Engel v. Vitale to be a violation of the establishment clause of the First Amendment.”[41]

The Golem and Christian Judaizers

While Jewish writers have been telling us that the superhero industry was created as a form of “the new Christ,” although this “new Christ” has been sprinkled with the writings of occultists like Alan Moore and Grant Morrison, devout followers of Aleister Crowley, as we shall see in due time, Protestant Christian publisher Tyndale House has writers such as Paul Asay trying to turn Batman “into a Christian role model,” an issue that Asay wrestles with throughout his book.

For Asay, Batman will “teach us a bit about goodness and God and our own conflicting natures, becoming an unwitting spiritual instructor.”

Asay continues to say that in Batman, “we won’t find a substitute for Jesus, but we may find a servant—even if he doesn’t fully understand it and might not always act like it.”[42]

In other words, Jewish writers are saying that Batman is a “new Christ,” but Asay is saying that he is a servant of Christ. Who is more deceived here: Jewish writers who know the creators of the superheroes inside out, or Christian Judaizers like Asay?

[1] Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Solzhenitsyn reader (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2006), 558.

[2] See Arie Kaplan, From Krakow to Krypton: Jews and Comic Books (Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society, 2008); Simcha Weinstein, Up,Up, and Oy Vey: How Jewish History, Culture, and Values Shaped the Comic Book Superhero (Baltimore: Leviathan Books, 2006); Paul Buhle, Jews and American Comics (New York: The New Press, 2008); Danny Fingeroth and Stan Lee, Disguised as Clark Kent: Jews, Comics, and the Creation of the Superhero (New York: Continuum, 2007); Stephen Harlan and Eunice G. Pollack, ed., Encyclopedia of American Jewish History (Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, Inc., 2008), 1:469-473; Gerard Jones, Men of Tomorrow: Geeks, Gangsters, and the Birth of the Comic Book (New York: Basic Books, 2004).

[3] Abe Novick, “Super Jew,” Jerusalem Post, June 16, 2013.

[4] Larry Tye, “10 Reasons Superman Is Really Jewish,” The Jewish Daily Forward, June 12, 2013.

[5] Lauren Elkin, “French Jewish Comic Book Writer Talks,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency, May 12, 2005.

[6] Jones, Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, 30.

[7] Anton Karl Kozlovic, “Superman as Christ-Figure: The American Pop Culture Movie Messiah,” Journal of Religion and Film, Vol. 6, No. 1, April 2002.

[8] Christopher Knowles and Joseph Michael Linsner, Our Gods Wear Spandex: The Secret History of Comic Book Heroes (San Francisco: Red Wheel/Weiser, 2007), 10.

[9] Ibid.

[10] Quoted in Abe Novick, “Super Jew,” Jerusalem Post, June 16, 2013

[11] Kozlovic, “Superman as Christ-Figure,” Journal of Religion and Film.

[12] James D. Bloom, Gravity Fails, 1.

[13] Ted Merwin, In Their Own Image: New York Jews in Jazz Age Popular Culture (Piscataway: Rutgers University Press, 2006), 10

[14] E. Michael Jones, “Wall Street Rises,” Culture Wars, October 2012.

[15] See Kaplan, From Krakow to Krypton, 74-76.

[16] Ibid., 75.

[17] Peter Sanderson, “Frank Miller Speaks,” Publishers Weekly, February 28, 2006.

[18] Ibid.

[19] Bridger, The New Jewish Encyclopedia (West Orange, NJ: Behrman House, 1976), 170.

[20] Alon Raab, “Ben Gurion’s Golem and Jewish Lesbians,” Samantha Baskind and Ranen Omer-Sherman, ed., The Jewish Graphic Novel: Critical Approaches (Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2008), 215.

[21] Ibid., 216.

[22] Ibid.

[23] Larry Tye, “10 Reasons Superman Is Really Jewish,” The Jewish Daily Forward, June 12, 2013.

[24] Ibid.

[25] Ibid.

[26] Geoff Boucher, “Revenge of the Dark Knight,” LA Times, April 29, 2007.

[28] Steven Isaac, “Video Review: Sin City,”

[29] Manohla Dargis, “A Savage and Sexy City of Pulp Fiction Regulars,” NY Times, April 1, 2005.

[30] Kevin MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents (Bloomington: 1st Books Library, 2004), 63.

[31] Solomon Grayzel, A History of the Jews: From the Babylonian Exile to the Establishment of Israel (Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1947), 185.

[32] Jones, Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, 72.

[33] Harry Mount, “Holy Propaganda! Batman is Tackling Osama bin Laden,” Daily Telegraph,

February 15, 2006.

[34] Aljean Harmetz, “U.S.C. Breaks Ground for a Film-TV School,” NY Times, November 25, 1981.

[35] Jones, Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, 919; see also Friedman, Neoconservative Revolution, 12.

[36] David A. Hollinger, Science, Jews, and Secular Culture: Studies in Mid-Twentieth-Century American Intellectual History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), 28.

[37] Ibid.

[38] Ibid.

[39] Ibid., 29.

[40] Murray Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 41.

[41] Ibid.

[42]Paul Asay, God on the Street of Gotham: What the Big Screen Batman Can Teach Us About God and Ourselves (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2012), introduction.

Archived Reads 0
Previous articleSnowden, CIA Shill?
Next articleSecurity, Security, What Crimes Are Committed in Thy Name
Jonas E. Alexis

Jonas E. Alexis graduated from Avon Park High School, studied mathematics and philosophy as an undergraduate at Palm Beach Atlantic University, and has a master's degree in education from Grand Canyon University.

Some of his main interests include the history of Christianity, U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book ,Christianity & Rabbinic Judaism: A History of Conflict Between Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism from the first Century to the Twenty-first Century.

He is currently teaching mathematics in South Korea. He plays soccer and basketball in his spare time. He is also a cyclist. He is currently writing a book tentatively titled Zionism and the West.

Alexis welcomes comments, letters, and queries in order to advance, explain, and expound rational and logical discussion on issues such as the Israel/Palestine conflict, the history of Christianity, and the history of ideas.

In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, Alexis asks that all queries be appropriately respectful and maintain a level of civility. As the saying goes, “iron sharpens iron,” and the best way to sharpen one’s mind is through constructive criticism, good and bad.

However, Alexis has no patience with name-calling and ad hominem attack. He has deliberately ignored many queries and irrational individuals in the past for this specific reason—and he will continue to abide by this policy.

Comments Closed


  1. Mr. Alexis,
    As usual, this essay is both provocative and somewhat open ended. The obvious premise is that Judaism is both anathema and damaging. The evidence supporting this premise is overwhelming.
    Yet, it is fantastic that the three Abrahamic religions all claim to spawn from the same otherworldly God, and all feature the savior complex. Both Christianity and Islam owe their very roots, their very existence to Judaism.
    I was indoctrinated, at a young age, that Christianity is a special development out of Judaism, the only “correct” development, and that Judaism, by refusing Jesus, had condemned itself. Considering this indoctrination, I find it particularly puzzling that so many Christians unwittingly mount up and charge to the defense of Israel and Zionism.
    In fact, I believe the case can be made that Jews are just being Jews, and that Christians have deluded themselves into a false definition of Jewish innocuousness.
    Yet, before we pronounce this thing dead and buried, there are a few unresolved matters that point to a very different consciousness on the part of organized Christianity than that which is easily acknowledged. One particular matter which strikes close to home is how “Thou shall not kill” becomes “Kill them all” whenever the state desires to exercise murderous violence. I’m sure many can recall the phrase, “praise God and pass the ammunition”.
    Yes, I’m aware of the doctrine of self defense, yet lets be honest, the endless wars waged by this ostensibly Christian country would be more than an embarrassment to anyone who thought about the circumstances of their inception, prosecution, and termination for more than a moment.
    It may be true that Christianity is synonymous with Western Culture, yet this has not always been the case. Why is it that only Iceland and Ireland initially accepted Christianity without being the victims of Christian led war? The story of Ireland is especially sad, considering the murderous crusade that extinguished the Celtic Church, and replaced it with the Roman.
    It can be comforting to regard the march of Christianity as an advancement, yet the cold truth is that Christianity was forced on unwilling converts by the sword. Ask the American Indian. What did Charlemagne do to convert those heathen Saxons again?
    I wonder, myself, if the damage, pain and destruction wrought by Judaism is neither corrected nor repaired by Christianity, but simply amplified?
    Certainly the evidence, from destroyed cultures, to genocides, to brutal suppression of alternative beliefs and practices points in this direction. Remember the Cathars.
    I do not expect you sir, to be able to answer these questions, or to resolve these dilemmas, that would be patently unfair. Yet, I do feel compelled to air these issues, since they are real, significant, and almost entirely banished from Christian thought.

    • Hey Mr. Kay,

      I always appreciate your input. Yes, those questions are indeed important, and they have not been “almost entirely banished from Christian thought.” In fact, since the past two thousand years, Christians have tried to address them—from Augustine and all the way to our modern age.

      There is a subtle confusion when it comes to “Judaism.” If by Judaism people mean the Old Testament, then the answer is yes. Rabbinic Judaism, however, is a repudiation of the Old Testament, an issue that I have pursued in the first volume of Christianity & Rabbinic Judaism. In general, Rabbinic Judaism is a subtle attack on the Old Testament, and it has a long history of subterfuge.

      The repugnant history of Christian Zionism will be addressed later in the series. And I sympathize with you that it is part of the problem. Augustine said that a philosophy should never be judged by its abuse. I can cite thousands of examples of Christian abuses all through history, but it would not do justice to the Christian movement by citing the evil acts committed by Christians. One has to take Christianity from its central tenets and see where those tenets lead us. And it one can say the same thing with other religions. That is why I have tried to take Rabbinic Judaism by its central tenets.

      You are right. The vast majority of evangelical Christians support this perpetual war in the Middle East. But those Judaizers come to this conclusion because the elevate Israel and the Jews above anything else. This again has a long and sad history, and we will address this issue right after the next two articles.

      Iceland and Ireland accepted Christianity without being the victims of Christian Zionism because Iceland and Ireland went back to their essentially Christian roots. As soon as the WASP made alliance with Jewish subversive activities in America, there has been an abiding hatred of the U.S. in the Middle East. You can’t drop drones in civilian populated areas and expect people to feel happy about it. Thanks again for your trenchant response.

    • Whilst it is an over simplification of events – there is something to be said for the fact that most of the Old Testament was written by jews for what they thought was an exclusively jewish audience. The writers meant their teachings only as a positive guide for their own descendants – not really expecting it to be read or analysed by anyone else.

      After Christ they must have realised that the world’s eyes would be closely studying their religion and attitudes to others. It was at this point that their real Judaic religion and attitudes to others more or less went underground and out of sight of the Goyim – and an ‘official’ public relations Judaic religion was created, boxed and packaged for non-jewish consumption. This is the imaginary benign version that is often talked about by Rabbis when they are publicly on the defensive for some outrage or other committed for their benefit.

      Their REAL religion, their real views and attitude to others is not really marketable – and could never be put in the public domain without inviting immediate attack and condemnation.

  2. It’s disgusting how immoral and depraved society has become where all the deviance goes. Next step legalize pedophilia? We have our own governments to blame for not acting and learning from history – ie Germany.

  3. Hey Tomer,

    Thanks again and I do appreciate your concerns. I knew that this issue would raise red flags and I made it very clear in the preface of the previous article that the word “Jewification” itself is to be applied in its theological and ideological sense, not in a “racial” term.

    Therefore, we are fighting against a wicked ideology, not against people who, in the words of Winston Churchill, can be good, bad, and indifferent. Just to let you know, one of my favorite writers is an ethnic Jew by the name of Mortimer Adler. You can google his name. I also enjoy reading David Berlinski’s work, an ethnic Jew who happens to be a mathematician and philosopher.

    More importantly, the person who started the Christian movement was an ethnic Jew, and nearly all the writers of the New Testament were ethnic Jews. My friend, this is not about ethnicity, and this is not about making one “better by knocking down those who are ahead of you.” It is about a wicked ideology. It was an ethnic Jew by the name of Paul who wrote that the Jews “both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men.” This is a theological and ideological battle, which has economic, political and spiritual ramifications.

    You are also making a huge claim here in positing, “Would we have a great movie and music industry that are loved all over the world? International best sellers? Would we have an internet as we know today?” So in the past two thousand years or more, Europe has to wait until the “Jewish Century” to produce something that is loved all over the world? That is again a huge claim and I’m not confident that you can produce enough evidence to support this historically. The works of Heraclitus, Thucydides, Plato, Aristotle, Kant, Descartes, the music of Bach, Bethoven, Handel, Hayden, the works of Shakespeare, Dickens, etc., are not well-loved all over the world? And comic books like Superman are “highly intelligent literature”?

    “And the most important of the all, the great christian majority decided that they liked the Jewish music…” We will deal with Christian Zionism later.

    • Tomer,

      Thanks again. You were positing rhetorical questions and by doing that you were trying to make some points. If not, then what is the purpose of writing statements like, “Would we all not have a much poorer life? Would we have a great movie and music industry that are loved all over the world? International best sellers? Would we have an internet as we know today? And those americans, who at age 30 still love to read comics like Superman, Donald Duck and other titles ment for children, how would you spend your precious time without such highly intelligent literature?”

      If you are focusing specifically on the USA, then are you seriously saying that America had to wait until the “Jewish Century” in order to produce something that is well “loved all over the world”?

      Believe it or not, that again is a huge claim and you are placing a huge burden of proof on your shoulder by taking such route. I’m not sure if you can historically carry that burden.

      You are concerned about being insulted, but then again you do exactly that by calling people “born again idiots…”I guess the Gold Rule is just a relic of the past.

      “I come from a generation where we KNEW things and could carry on a discussion about different subjects for hours, without having to run to Google or Wiki.” The implication seems to be that Google or Wiki are the only source of information available to us.

      Secondly, the statement seems to imply that your generation did not ask for proof when an extraordinary claim is made. I do not know how old you are, but you were not born in the nineteenth century. Mathematician and philosopher W. K. Clifford, who actually lived several generations prior to yours, said, “It is wrong, everywhere, always, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.” And if Clifford happens to be too old, read Carl Sagan’s essay “The Burden of Skepticism.” If proof is not a prerequisite for any meaningful interaction, then that is the end of our discussion.

      I keep saying that the issue is not about ethnicity or Jewish names or even precious individuals. The issue is about an ideology which has several implications. Three of the many people who positively reviewed several parts of my work are Jewish academics and intellectuals. I remembered back in 2009 that I told my Jewish colleague and dear friend that I was writing a book on this subject, he said, “Hey, I’ll protect you.”

  4. Jonas I look forward to reading your column as you are able to bring forth the truth. One program you haven’t mentioned is Star Trek, why aren’t there any Jews on board? Right I forgot they can’t poison anything that they can’t control. The universe is too big for them.

    I hope that many will read your articles and understand that it is common knowledge as they say in Germany about the holocaust that will convict you of denial, just ask Germar Rudolph.

    When you really look at the Jewish question, one starts to realize that they are a very immoral society. Or shall we say that they are a true manifestation of Satan, sign here and we own your soul. So why wouldn’t they want to do as they do.

    I for one have turned my back on this jewification process period. One only has to question why isn’t there any criticism of Jews period. As they only broadcast themselves as the innocent victims, but never the villain. In the entire history of the Jews, they have only been represented as victims. In the film industry or should we say the best brainwashing tool ever invented as they have all the volunteers eagerly waiting for their next dose, just like a heroin addict needs his fix. Just like Satan always smiling and happy to see more misery at our expense. The star of David is never associated with anything derogatory, why? Hollywood to comics what a joke. Maybe it was Hollywood(Jews) that represents the serpent, who had convinced Eve to share an apple with Adam. So the serpent found the goyim easy prey from the beginning.

    • Thanks. The next installment will deal with Aleister Crowley, Alan Moore, and Freemasonry on pop culture.

  5. So, I guess I’m an outsider since Ive never spent that much time or money on the Hollywierd, or the music Industry. Even Stephen King bugs me out. He loves ET a little too much.

  6. Excaliber says:

    “In other words, what is good for us – is apparently not good for them!”

    This is true for a smaller percentage than one would think.Your comments may not apply to the Reform Jewish movement and even some of the Conservative.It would definately apply to approximately 10% of Jews in the Orthodoc,Haridi and the Hasidic sects.Secular Jewish think just about like we do and we probabaly wouldn’t know they were Jewish if they were our neighbors/.The Zionist religious are another aspect that are frenzied in their words and actions just like our Evangelical Christians.Which are the worst for the world?

    • Lawrence – I do accept that there are some religious jews that not only look upon the actions of the zionists with horror – but also blame them and their ilk for generating and building up a potential backlash against the jewish people as a whole. Zionist plots are not so clever that they are not eventually compromised by someone in the end.

      Historical fight-backs by Gentiles against jewish plots, scams and excesses rarely end up with the right targets or culprits being singled out and attacked. I believe that jews need to be more vocal about this so as to identify the REAL gangsters. This happened in Sicily with the mafia in a very similar scenario.

      If jews generally do not point out and expose the long term nefarious schemes and actions of the cabal and its members (which they know better than anyone) – then they become guilty by association in people’s minds and are seen as generally benefiting from the criminal behaviour.

      I believe that large numbers of jews denouncing the jewish cabal in the same way that Gilad Atzmon does would remove the gangsters, generate trust in the jewish people – and have a profound and positive effect on the world.

  7. Yet another superb article by Jonas – whose concise and comprehensive work clearly touches a nerve or two among those who would rather not have this well researched material ever seeing the light of day.

    Keep up the root canal dentistry Jonas!

    • We will briefly deal with the “Jewification process” in popular music, including the music of Jay-Z

  8. Super article, a keeper. I’m 81 so I’ve personally witnessed, experienced the jewification. I read all the authors cited in the 80’s since I was writing articles and stories for submission. I even attended a script writers group’s meetings in Hollywood. As Normal Mailer stated sometime in the 80’s, “we are all jews now”. I also collected and sold vinyl records for over 20 years, personally listening and grading over 6000 records. In addition to controlling Hollywood type media, “they” have a lock on the music recording industry.

    • It’s getting a lot better these days, with the Internet and iTunes and all, but it won’t recover fully until Gentiles regain control of the airwaves. There are all manner of great musicians living out of their vans and traveling cross-country to make $300 per man, I’ve worked with quite a few in recent years.

      I think the days of Jewish control of the airwaves are also numbered. When we get radio / TV back, LOOK OUT. There will all kinds of amazing music that you never heard before, when we’re all free from the Jewish shackles.

      They really aren’t very smart, after all and they KNOW it. That’s why they’re so scared. Guess what? I’ll cry later……. they fully deserve what’s coming.

    • “I think the days of Jewish control of the airwaves are also numbered.”

      WGBH here in Boston, part of PBS is more Jewish influenced to date than ever. More documentaries regarding Jews than ever before. It’s done on a very gradual basis, so I’m not sure how many people have noticed.

      Although I wish you were correct, I don’t believe you are at this jucture.

    • I agree, we’re not there yet, but some BIG changes are coming, soon. Regaining control of the airwaves is closely tied in with regaining control of our politics, our economy, our military, government, finance and all the other things the Jews have stolen from us.

  9. Great piece, but I think there’s a whole other universe involved in Jewish control of the arts, or at least the musical arts: control of the studios, publishing houses, distribution chains and “unions” like BMI, ASCAP, AFI and the like.

    If they can’t produce the content, they can control what we Goyim are allowed to hear and see or even take credit for something they didn’t create. Used to be musicians couldn’t get heard if they didn’t have a record deal with a Jewish-run record label. A songwriter couldn’t distribute his / her songs in bars, restaurants, venues etc. if he / she didn’t pay their “protection” fees to the Jewish mobsters of BMI or ASCAP.

    I read a story where the composer of the Star Trek theme had to forfeit royalties to his Jewish masters (Hal Leonard, maybe?) who wrote some crappy lyrics to his theme, which were never recorded, but who nonetheless became a “co-writer” to the music, long after the fact. The Jews took their royalty payments ANYWAY. Happens every day in Tinsel-Town.

    A scriptwriter could NEVER get his screenplays read by film producers or artists unless they had a Jewish “agent” or “manager” to get their works “through the door” to the “right people” (read: right Jews)

    I can’t tell you how many sessions I’ve worked on where some Gentile did all the work, while some Jewish flunkie gets his name on the album, credits, etc. I mean, it’s like working for the Mafia, except MUCH worse, the Jews are the Mafia turned pro.

    There are many stories floating around where some musical artist was TOLD by his Jewish producer to include a song or three, inevitably written by one of his Jewish cousins, on an album or CD. I’ve seen it myself more than a few times.

    You can’t own a studio in Los Angeles without doing some serious boot-licking to the Israelites. I was told by a Jewish studio owner how even the mainstream TV studios loved the Jewish porn biz, because they would all help each other out with talent, session time, equipment, whatever. Just two facets of the same ethnic syndicate, for all intents and purposes.

    Tin-pan Alley was a notorious way for the Jews to buy songs for a pittance and never give credit to their creators.

    Anyway, I could go on, but I better get back to work. I gotta feed myself, ya’ know, unlike most of the Jews I’ve worked for who get fed by others.

  10. Excellent article. Our Reform rabbi when I was a kid came from Pittsburgh and once boasted to me that all Hollywood was run by Pittsburgh born Jews.

  11. Excellent article.

    A lot of the readers at VT have probably read the article, How Jewish is Hollywood? By Joel Stein
    December 19, 2008, but it’s a gem from a Jewish writer, excerpt form the article:

    I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe “the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews,” down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.

    How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.

    The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.

    As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between “The 700 Club” and “Davey and Goliath” on TV all day.

    So I’ve taken it upon myself to re-convince America that Jews run Hollywood by launching a public relations campaign, because that’s what we do best. I’m weighing several slogans, including: “Hollywood: More Jewish than ever!”; “Hollywood: From the people who brought you the Bible”; and “Hollywood: If you enjoy TV and movies, then you probably like Jews after all.”

    Brian: Out of curiosity I once watched a little bit of an episode of the Family Guy on the Jewish operated Fox TV station. The father of the family reached over the counter in a store and without permission squeezed the breasts of the woman behind the counter, just maybe sexual assault isn’t funny. Crude sex jokes, including crude oral sex jokes are now common place in Jewish controlled situation comedies.

    I don’t think the Jews who control our televisions represent the average Jewish person but as long as Jewish people run our television the American sheeple will believe anything they tell them, including Muslims are worse than Charles Manson.

    Is Jewish controlled television a reflection of the degradation of American society or a major part of the cause of the degradation of American society?


  12. It is important to remember that there is programming that is designed for gentile consumption – and separate material for jewish digestion. This became vividly apparent to a colleague of mine who accidentally found himself on a flight with lots of jewish passengers. The women and children were strictly banned from watching certain (otherwise ‘normal’) in-flight films and entertainment. They openly explained to him that this was because they knew it contained deliberate mental ‘poisoning’ that impressionable people should not watch.

    Students of jewish influence in the mass media will notice a paradox here: while that influence is used in a hundred or more different ways to push leftist clap-trap; to weaken people’s moral standards; to deride Christian beliefs; reduce national pride; criminalize racial pride; make patriotic and national spirit unfashionable; and ridicule healthy taboos built over centuries to protect society – jews THEMSELVES are to be found among the worlds most militant nationalists, the most avid self promoters and prolific purveyors of their traditions, their racial pride and general right wing thinking.

    In other words, what is good for us – is apparently not good for them!

    • For the avoidance of doubt – when I mention jewish nationalism I of course mean militant nationalism in favour of israel – not nationalism for the host country in which they actually live. Prominent jews are always advising their host countries to give up freedoms, safeguards and the things that they hold dear – especially if those things get in the way of the One World Government. Firearms being a classic example.

      It has never ceased to amaze me how so many apparently ‘equality’ loving, leftist, atheistic, chilled out, anti-military jewish ‘change agent enthusiast’ professors in Britain – suddenly become traditionalist, discriminating, religious, right wing, foaming at the mouth, nationalistic militarists – where israel is concerned. This immediate transition when israel is mentioned is very peculiar. They clearly do not see non-jews as being entitled to the same protections as israel for some reason.

      It would almost seem as though they want all of us Gentiles to adopt their state controlled, ‘communist’, internationalist, anti-family, anti-Christian, anti-moral standards, egalitarian, selfless, crime forgiving, laid back, identity free, superficial, feminine slave mentality – for OURSELVES … whilst THEY adopt a:

      Hard line; fascist; nationalist; family orientated; religious led; strictly coded; highly discriminating; severe; highly traditionalist and bloodline connected; macho aggressive mentality for THEMSELVES.

      I believe that this is called ‘Don’t do as we do – do as we TELL you’.

      (The only time that Brits and the US are allowed some nationalistic military pride for ourselves – a la ‘Saving Private Ryan’ style acknowledgement – is when our populations are being groomed and channeled to provide yet more armies to attack israel’s enemies around the world. That, of course, means everyone – including Britain and the US – eventually).

    • In the United States the Jewish controlled major media constantly tells us our soldiers are heroes, protecting our freedom and they’re keeping us safe to help Americans justify the slaughter of Muslims in the Middle East.

      A million to one shot but I wonder if he would hear the same crap from the Jewish controlled mainstream media if the majority of Americans learned Israel did 911 and our soldier invaded Israel? Perhaps not.

    • Brian – they would make a film about it – to change public perception of it and to re-write the realities of the situation for brain dead public consumption around the world. The Americans who discovered the 9/11 atrocity would be daubed as evil Nazi anti-semites of course – plotting to murder innocent jews. The soldiers invading israel would be jack-booted fascists bayoneting babies and the like. (The worst US soldiers would have a Southern accent and blond hair of course, Jim). Am I getting close?

      They first learned to do this in 1917 – with the film about the allegedly evil Tsar Nicholas II of Russia, the starving peasants – and the storming of the winter palace by the heroic marxists. It was all lies of course. That did not seem to matter, though. The film images were so powerful that even the intelligence services of free nations seemed to accept what the images showed – as fact.

    • I suppose the only hope Americans have of freeing themselves from the Jewish Zionist stranglehold is becoming useless to Israel. Sigh.

      According to Wayne Madsen a quote from Netanyhu: He was once overheard by an ex-CIA agent as saying to a group of his supporters, “Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away.”

Comments are closed.