WTC insurance fraud? Silverstein “trial” runs Monday through Wednesday

25
2545

Press TV

Is this the world’s worst case of insurance fraud…ever?

That’s what many are saying, as the world’s biggest real-estate swindler and the world’s most corrupt judge meet in a Manhattan courtroom on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. At issue: billions of dollars in loot from the demolition of the World Trade Center complex on September 11th, 2001.

World Trade Center owner Larry Silverstein – who confessed on national television to “pulling” World Trade Center Building 7 – will appear in the courtroom of Judge Alvin Hellerstein at 500 Pearl St. in New York City. The non-jury trial, which is expected to last three days, will decide whether Silverstein is entitled to recover $3.5 billion from airlines and airport-related companies, in addition to the $4.9 billion he has already received for his “losses” on September 11th.

The question on everyone’s mind is: Why is Silverstein claiming that airliners destroyed his buildings, when he has already confessed to demolishing at least one of them himself? In the 2002 PBS documentary “America Rebuilds,” Silverstein admitted to complicity in the controlled demolition of WTC-7, a 47-story skyscraper that dropped into its own footprint in 6.5 seconds.

The mysterious destruction of Building 7 has become the Rosetta Stone of 9/11. Virtually all independent experts who have studied the case, including thousands of architects and engineers, agree that the government’s explanation – that a few small office fires somehow destroyed WTC-7 – is a non-starter. Building 7, these experts say, was obviously taken down in a controlled demolition, as Silverstein himself admitted. (A nationwide ad campaign called “Re-Think 9/11” will remind millions of Americans about Building 7 this September.)

Despite his confession to demolishing his own building, Silverstein has already received $861 million from insurers for Building 7 alone, as well as over $4 billion for the rest of the Trade Center complex. That $861 million for WTC-7 was paid on the basis of Silverstein’s claim that airplanes were somehow responsible for making Building 7, which was not hit by any plane, disappear at free-fall acceleration.

The insurance companies are not openly accusing Silverstein of insurance fraud, presumably because doing so would threaten to demolish the 9/11 cover-up and bring down the US and Israeli governments at free-fall speed. But they have gone so far as to call Silverstein’s demand for more money “absurd,” a considerable understatement.

The insurance companies claim that Silverstein’s demands amount to “double recovery.” They say that Silverstein was already paid $4.9 billion – vastly more than the paltry $115 million or so that he and his backers paid for the complex just weeks before it was demolished – so why is he asking for another $3.5 billion? Silverstein’s answer: He needs the money.

And does he ever. He was originally demanding an extra $11 billion, before Hellerstein capped it at $3.5 billion.

The insurers have not mentioned the fact that the World Trade Center Towers were condemned for asbestos in early 2001, just months before Silverstein bought them in July, six weeks prior to their demolition. They have not mentioned that Silverstein doubled the insurance coverage when he purchased the Trade Center. They have not mentioned that Silverstein hardballed his insurers to change the coverage to “cash payout.” They have not mentioned that Silverstein engineered his purchase of the Trade Center through fellow Zionist billionaire Lewis Eisenberg, Chair of the Republican National Committee and head of the New York Port Authority.

As Christopher Bollyn wrote in 2002:


“Silverstein and Eisenberg have both held leadership positions with the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), a billion dollar Zionist ‘charity’ organization. Silverstein is a former chairman of the United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, Inc. This is an umbrella organization which raises hundreds of millions of dollars every year for its network of hundreds of member Zionist agencies in the United States and Israel.”

According to Ha’aretz, Silverstein is a close friend of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. They speak on the phone every weekend.

The insurance companies have likewise neglected to mention that after doubling his insurance coverage immediately before 9/11, Silverstein re-doubled his winnings after 9/11 by claiming double indemnity. According to Silverstein’s spokesman, “the two hijacked airliners that struck the 110-story twin towers Sept. 11 were separate ‘occurrences’ for insurance purposes, entitling him to collect twice on $3.6 billion of policies.” The bizarre double-indemnity claim was approved in 2004.

Additionally, the insurers have failed to mention that on the morning of 9/11, Silverstein and his daughter both failed to show up for their daily breakfast at Windows on the World restaurant atop the North Tower. Both offered flimsy pretexts – Silverstein claiming that he had suddenly remembered a dermatologist’s appointment.

How has Silverstein managed to get away with murder, in the most obvious case of insurance fraud ever?

Thanks to his partner in crime, Judge Alvin Hellerstein.

Hellerstein’s courtroom is Ground Zero in the cover-up of the crimes of 9/11. Virtually all 9/11 litigation has been funneled through his courtroom, including Ellen Mariani’s recent lawsuit against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and others.

Like Silverstein and Eisenberg, Hellerstein is a rabid Zionist with close ties to Israel. The judge’s son and sister both emigrated from the US to orthodox Zionist settlements in the Occupied Territories.

Investigative journalist Christopher Bollyn writes: “Hellerstein’s son is an Israeli lawyer who emigrated to Israel in 2001 and whose law firm works for and with the Rothschild-funded Mossad company responsible for the 9-11 terror attacks.”

Bollyn notes that Hellerstein’s son, an Israeli lawyer, represents “the Mossad-controlled airport security firm named International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) N.V., which is the owner of Huntleigh U.S.A., the passenger screening company that checked the passengers that boarded the aircraft at the key airports on 9-11.”

Additionally, Bollyn writes, “Both Alvin Hellerstein and his son Joseph worked for the well-known Jewish law firm of Stroock, Stroock & Lavan before moving to the positions they now hold…Stroock, Stroock & Lavan played a key role in the setting up of 9-11…Stroock has a long history of representing the Rothschilds and other high-level Zionists.”

Will New York City 9/11 skeptics protest the Silverstein-Hellerstein trial this Monday through Wednesday?

Will truth and justice ever triumph?

In order to triumph, truth and justice will have to defeat the world’s wealthiest and most powerful criminal network.

25 COMMENTS

  1. Was AIG in on that swine’s payoff? Think of the beauty of it; Pay out an amount large enough to your fellow “tribesman” w/o question, (umm, do insurance companies normally do such benevolent acts?), then bankrupt yourself and get it all back via the goys in your pocket in D.C. w/ a “bailout?” One must wonder….even a Goy must wonder.

    • Yup. Another member of the Satanic…er I’m sorry ‘Luciferian’ tribe.

      “Maurice R. Greenberg, chief fraudster of A.I.G. and 9/11 conspiracy suspect. Greenberg’s fraudulent company received more than $180 billion from the U.S. Treasury in the Bush-Obama bailout.”

      ****http://www.bollyn.com/the-fleecing-of-america-9-11-and-the-crisis-on-wall-street

  2. There is another aspect to this blatant series of crimes.

    Since Odigo published a message to “Jews” on it’s messaging service of the threat given 2 hours before the attack on 9/11/01 there was a responsibility to notify “OTHER” citizens in NYC of the pending threat at the WTC Complex.

    Apparently the message was serious enough for nearly 4,000 “Jews” who worked at the WTC Buildings TO NOT SHOW UP FOR WORK, yet NOT serious enough to warn their fellow workers and citizens of the impending doom awaiting them on 9/11/01. Was Larry Silverstein and his accomplices on the privileged “LIST OF JEWS ONLY” that got the message, two hours earlier, that fateful morning of 9/11/01 ? Is that another reason why he went to his dermatology appointment, and his daughter not showing up as usual?

    If he and other of his accomplices were on the list at ODIGO Messaging it would add further weight to an already steaming pile of shit that is their illegal insurance claims (surrounded in mass murder for money and Israel), the clearest case of “Jewish Lightening” in the history of MANKIND. If they are allowed to collect on these claims there is NO JUSTICE in this world. And the world should care, we have all lost a lot.

    Think of this. In addition to NO planes, limited fire damage and his confession to having them “Pull-It” a clear controlled demolition term, they evacuated the area and then on a countdown 10. 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, WTC Building – 7 came down exactly as announced on the countdown.

    Has ANY other building in all of history ever done that? NO, NEVER.

    That’s right NO steel building has EVER collapsed due to random fires, and limited debris, ever in the history of mankind, come down on its own, with a countdown?

    And if the building was set-up for demolition, with an order to “Pull-It” it could NOT have been 19 Arab hijackers with box-cutters, but needed weeks of preparation, who had that kind of access? Hint: They weren’t Arabs, they were “Jews”

    And Hellerstein, another loyal tribe member, is in on it.

    • “Was Larry Silverstein and his accomplices on the privileged “LIST OF JEWS ONLY” that got the message, two hours earlier, that fateful morning of 9/11/01 ? Is that another reason why he went to his dermatology appointment, and his daughter not showing up as usual?”

      #######################################################################

      You’re implying that Silverslime was not complicit in the crime? Sorry but that notion is laughably absurd on its face.

  3. Insurance companies don’t challenge the official narrative of 911 to deny Silverstein’s claim for a couple of reasons. First the official narrative is considered to be common knowledge. Insurance companies are under the same political pressures as major national politicians to steer clear of rocking the boat. Denying payment of benefits on the basis of inside job may open insurance companies up to bad faith claims, which in some states would entitle Silverstein to treble (three times) the initial claim. Secondly insurance companies are gigantic institutions whose board members and stockholders are members of the very global financial mafia that directed 911 and benefits from Middle East hegemony. When one considers who the Anglo-American-Judeo mafia is, it is primarily a global, interlocking network of financial control, with insurance companies in key positions.

    • The thing is, SIlverstein made public claims regarding a conversation he allegedly had with someone he referred to as the “Fire Dept. Commander” (or something like that), in which a decision was made to “pull it”.

      Also, someone (Hymie Brown) who was represented as an authority on the design and construction of the towers, made some demonstrably false statements regarding the design and construction of the towers.

      Under the circumstances, these would seem to me to be valid areas of inquiry. If there is any “bad faith” here, it is certainly not on behalf of anyone defending against a frivolous lawsuit by Silverslime.

    • I agree with you on the facts, but the insurance companies evidently made a strategic decision not to contest their liability based on ‘inside job’ insurance fraud for a reason. Imagine being a Swiss Re or National General and then bringing down the entire Anglo-American-Zionist global power structure by revealing during trial one of your policy holders committed insurance fraud. And for what? To save a lousy $3 billion? These financial giants are key players in the global power structure and so will not cut off their nose to spite their face.

    • Your point is well taken, but without even getting into the “inside job” hypothesis (and taking NIST’s laughably absurd white paper on WTC7 at face value) someone could reasonably question whether the losses would have been as great if Silverstein and the “Fire Dept. Commander” didn’t agree to abandon fire-fighting efforts at WTC7 under mysterious circumstances.

      IOW, if my house was on fire (but the fire seemed small and was limited to certain parts of the house), and the fire company came, and they and I agreed we should just let it burn…and then, after it burnt to the ground several hours later and was a total loss, would the insurance co. just cheerfully hand over the money, or would they have a few questions about why there was no meaningful effort to save the structure?

      My point being that Silverstein is extremely vulnerable to certain lines of inquiry; lines of inquiry that don’t explicitly imply inside job, but that he would have to avoid…thereby possibly ending his quest for more blood money.

      Of course I realize that Jews are in charge of most everything thus there is corruption everywhere, and there will likely be no effort to stop Silverstein.

  4. Without even getting into the fact that 9/11 was a fraud and an inside job and without getting into Silverstein’s obvious complicity in the crime, how does someone collect far more insurance on something than what it’s worth to begin with?

    If you insure a package at the post office or if you insure your car or almost anything else, and something happens, e.g., your package is lost or your car totaled, you can generally only collect what it’s [demonstrably] worth, can’t you? Even if everything happened exactly the way our bloodthirsty Jewish supremacist Masters claim, why isn’t this scumbag’s haul limited to, say, the assessed value of the property?

    Also, why don’t the insurance companies subpoena Hymie Brown, for example, and ask some really embarrassing questions?

    I’m thinking there must be Jews in charge of the insurance companies, too, and they’re playing with other peoples’ money, which they’ll gladly hand over to Silverstein (and probably get some back as a reward one way or another). Thus the half-hearted legal contest they appear to be putting up is probably just for show; i.e., if they just handed the money over without even any lip service, some of the lesser mentally defective sheeple might suspect that something’s wrong in Mister Rogers’ neighborhood.

    • The insurance companies could also subpoena the imaginary “Fire Dept. Commander” that Silverstein claims he spoke with on the phone in his imaginary conversation about WTC7, and they could also subpoena “the dermatologist” that Silverstein allegedly had an appointment with.

      The fact that they seem to be doing none of these things is very suspicious, IMO.

    • Excellent questions Harold. I’ve always said there is more forensic investigation in a one hour episode of Perry Mason on tv than in 12 years of whoreporate media reporting on 9-11. And now as you point out, it appears that the judicial system itself is rigged. We live in a cartoon world of one dimensional actors.

  5. A journey of a thousand steps begin with one step and this is the beginning of the end for the cornered rats.
    But we have to wait and see if sleght of hand procedures arent involved and it is not another move to deceive us.

  6. again..
    why would OSAMA BIN LADEN care at all about destroying domestic financial fraud investigations?
    hell, he’d more likely grabbed a bag of popcorn to enjoy watching corrupt criminals being locked away,
    if he were really such a “corrupt America hater”. investigations sure didnt threaten HIM at all..

    SEC investigations? kaboom! “what investigations?”
    2.3 trillion “missing” from the pentagon? kaboom! “what accounting department?”
    there were meetings in the towers too, everyone knowledgeable being killed.

    Rudy Giuliani (GHOULiani rather) sure did a great job of removing all evidence ASAP,
    computer hard-drives carted off with the rubble to keep friends in high places outta jail maybe?
    the media hailed him as “America’s mayor!”, he even ran for president?!
    if the air was safe to breath, why was he running away so fast with a personal flunkee carrying an oxygen bottle for his facemask? to avoid inhaling radioactive crap he knew all about maybe?

    so here we go with lucky larry being hauled into a courtroom, when he admitted “pull it” nationally..
    no rendition or waterboarding for larry, why would they do something like THAT, right?
    I dont expect to see anything but yet another round of criminals aiding criminals with this BS.

  7. Man this is enough to make your blood boil, what nerve these zionists have. This bastard became insanely rich off of the lives of many others and now is double dipping again! The airlines are broke, so any awards will come from bailouts from us.

    These charades are allowed to proceed in the zionist court room, yet any legitimate lawsuit from a victim’s family is undoubtedly squashed under the guise of national security.

    It would be amazing if the airlines would bring in the real flight data showing those two flights over western PA and Illinois.

  8. In a sane world Lucky Larry would be hung or shot by a firing squad for being a mass murderer and traitor to his nation. My personal favorite would be to strap him to a chair on the roof of a 50 story building that just happened to be scheduled for controlled demolition.

    And then we would give the order to “pull it” and just watch as it all came tumbling down.

    • What judicial imagination you have. But he has to be asked how he could mobilze the demolition in such a short notice, and if the same techniques couldnt have been applied to the other 2 towers. For as far as we can tell, technically it takes months of planning between the desire to demolish and the day of actual demolition.

  9. Abe Bird brain: what does your comment have to do with Dr. Barrett’s article? Did you even read it? Or maybe English is not your forte?

  10. @Abe Bird Brain: the problem is twofold:

    (1) You need to defend yourselves against the psychopathic misanthropes that rule your regime.

    (2) You will need to defend yourselves against Almighty God who created all mankind as His children and does not appreciate the racialist abuse and scorn heaped upon them by his narcissistic Jewish offspring.

  11. Great article, Kevin. I don’t understand why the insurance companies didn’t challenge Silverstein’s claims in court? These companies are not known for their benevolence and altruism. They are actually paid incentive bonuses to deny claims as much as possible. So why did they go belly up on 9-11? It makes no sense at all.

    Is it possible they were paid off by the Fed or US govt to play along with the court’s bogus ruling?

    Can anyone explain this suffocating tsunami of insanity?

    • So the insurers are willing to swallow a multi billion dollar loss just so they dont have to wade into 9-11 truth territory? Makes zero sense to me, unless they are being paid off on the flip side. Like the CEOs who are awarded incredible salaries and bonuses as rewards by the boards and shareholders for suppressing employee wages and shredding labor unions and such.

    • Insurance companies recognize a coup and like my daddy always said, Son you can’t fight the system. Larry Silverfishstein has the chutzpah of someone protected from high places, but he may find he’s crossed the line.

Comments are closed.