Three Women – a Declaration of Love


  Three Women – a Declaration of Love

… by  Uri Avnery,  and  Gush Shalom,  Israel


We must love those who stand up for us on this special day

Different cupcakes for different ladies…and causes

[ Editor’s note: Uri creates a new genre for Valentine cards by saluting three brave women for standing up for the causes and traditions that they love, even when the cost is high.

I like it…a good way to turn Valentines Day into a more meaningful event than enriching florists and high end restaurants to prove you love someone. That’s something that should be done 365 days a year and the world would be a much nicer place, and safer.

They say you can’t teach an old dog new tricks, but Uri at 90 knocked that out of the park. So it was a pleasure to share this with you today, as the editors at VT also strive to not get stale and predictable. You long time readers have seen us change and evolve, and more of that is on the way as our world keeps changing as I type.

One does not have to agree with the selected causes of these ladies, but just their courage to admire them. It seems to be a diminishing talent in much of the world, particularly in politics where our election officials seem more beholden to banksters and gangsters once they get into office.  The bad guys seem to be viewed as holding the keys to the palace for keeping them in office…to the detriment of us all.

So I will close with a salute to all of you VT ladies, who once were not here but have added so much to the mix over the last year or two. Things are a lot more interesting around here than when we were a boys club only… Jim W. Dean ]


–  First published  February 15, 2014  –


Achinoam Nini

Achinoam Nini

This is a declaration of love. Three loves, actually. I love Achinoam Nini. I love her from afar. I have never met her. I love her for what she did a few weeks ago.

The Israeli organization of composers and writers had awarded her a prize for Life Achievement. Though only 44 years old, she certainly deserved it. She is a wonderful singer. Noa (as she is called abroad) did something very unusual: she refused the prize.

Her reason: another singer, Ariel Zilber, was to receive the same distinction with her. Noa is an outspoken leftist. Zilber is an outspoken rightist. Is that a reason to refuse a prize?

Throughout the country there was an outcry. How dare she? What about freedom of expression? What about artistic liberty? Rightists denounced her vociferously. They were joined by many righteous leftists. True, they say, Zilber is a rightist, but democracy demands that freedom of expression be safeguarded for all, even – and especially – for those who express objectionable views.

Even old Voltaire was brought into the fray. “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

So what has Zilber said that moved Noa to refuse to stand with him on the same platform? For one thing, he has expressed his abysmal hatred for homosexuals. “To be a homo is a perversion,” he declared, and demanded that they be banned from society. Not only they. All secular people. “The seculars have nothing to offer, only to get sick with AIDS and look at naked women. Phooey!”

"Ah yes...kill everybody that disagrees with you. What a lovely trait."

“Ah yes…kill everybody that disagrees with you. Now that’s a distinguishing trait! “

Gays and seculars are not the only damned people. Leftists may be even worse. “All leftists should be expelled and sent to the devil. They are Amalek!” As every Jew knows, God commanded the Children of Israel to kill all Amalekites so that their very name be eradicated forever.

King Saul, a national hero, was dethroned by the prophet Samuel because he did not kill all his Amalekite prisoners, men, women and children.

But this is only part of Zilber’s public persona. He also believes that Yigal Amir, the assassin of Yitzhak Rabin, should be immediately released. He praised Baruch Goldstein, the settler who murdered 29 Muslims at prayer in the Hebron Ibrahimia mosque (called by Jews the “Cave of Machpela”.)

He also sympathizes with the “Price Tag” thugs, the Ku Klux Klan settlers who go out at night to terrorize defenseless Arab villagers. They do the right thing, because “the Arabs are not worth anything. They don’t know how to do anything but kill!”

To cap it all, Zilber proclaimed: “Kahane was right!” Rabbi Meir Kahane was condemned by the Supreme Court of Israel as a fascist, and his “Kach” movement was outlawed – an almost unique judgment where Jews are concerned. To round things off, Zilber also wrote and composed a song on this theme.

Does this person deserve the protection of Freedom of Speech? Jews all over the world condemn the French government for tolerating the detestable anti-Semite Dieudonné M’bala M’bala, the inventor of the neo-Nazi “quenelle” salute. But this demagogue is a moderate compared to Zilber.

[Editors Note:  Once again, on issues close to his heart Uri has situational ethics when it comes to Dieudonne’s standing up to power. That he can’t see what he has in common with these ladies in a self imposted blindness. After all, M’bala M’bala is a stand up comic, and they have been pissing people of a long time.

We have Jewish examples, not the least of which was Lenny Bruce. But once outside his beloved Israeli, Uri becomes the defender of quashing unpopular speech.We see this blindness all over the world, with the Christian Zionists, our Congress that enables Israeli espionage, the Takfiris ‘serving God’, etc., and they see nothing wrong with it. Dear Uri, you don’t want to go to your grave a ninety percenter.]

"The Zios have to have laws not to protect them from comics"

“The Zios have to have laws not to protect them from comics”

Should Noa appear on the same stage with this “Gift of God”? Or, if she had been living in the German Weimar republic three generations ago, with a clownish demagogue called Adolf Hitler? And would our bleeding-heart democrats have denounced her for refusing?

Well, I for one admire her. Hers was an act of selflessness. In doing what she did, she was making a huge sacrifice. She will be boycotted by all right-wing audiences. She will not be invited to festivals by organizers who shake in their boots when thinking about the loss of government subsidies.

I remember that 45 years ago, after the outbreak of the first intifada, there was a large demonstration for peace in what later became Rabin Square in Tel Aviv. Practically all artistic celebrities of the day were there. Artists fought among each other for the right to appear.

These days are long past. Even well-known leftist artists are now afraid to express an opinion. God forbid. It could mean financial ruin.

So where did Noa find the courage to stand up and refuse? Both her parents are Yemenites – as was, curiously enough, Silver’s mother, a famous singer in my youth. As a rule, Yemenites – like other Oriental Jews – tend to be rightists.

The solution to the riddle may be that she grew up in the US, where her father was working. Being educated there in Jewish schools in the 70s and 80s may have implanted certain values. I love her.

Anat Kam in court

Anat Kam in court

I love Anat Kam. Anat was a soldier. Her military duties gave her access to secret documents. She copied 2000 documents of them, which contained evidence of war crimes committed by Israeli soldiers, and gave them to a reporter from Haaretz.

The paper published the secret report on one such incident. The army investigators discovered the source. After almost two years of house arrest, Anat was condemned to a long prison term. On appeal, it was reduced to four years.

Last week, after two years and two months in prison, she was freed on parole. A few days later, she revealed her present state of mind in a newspaper interview. It is a good read.

Anat is very intelligent and observant. Her description of her prison experience is vivid and fascinating. It appears that the prison authorities treated her comparatively well. Before entering prison she was very afraid of being beaten up or raped.

However, the inmates of the women’s prison, though mostly primitive patriots, did not hold her traitorous past against her and with few exceptions befriended her. Women who had murdered their children or lovers asked for her assistance in writing petitions.

Anat seems to be a person with a lot of empathy. She is bitter about Haaretz and the reporter, who, she believes, betrayed her trust out of fear. One can also be bitter about the peace camp in general, which was so afraid that almost nobody raised his/her voice in defense of her courageous act.

The high risk and high cost of moral leadership

The high risk and high cost of moral leadership

What made me sad was her contrition. She declares in the interview that she is sorry for what she did. I believe that she isn’t sorry because of the heavy price she paid.

At the age of 28, she has to begin her life anew, branded as a traitor to her people. Four precious years have been stolen from her. She refuses to emigrate. “Why should I? This is my home!” she declares.

What makes her regret her action is the belief that it was all for nothing. She thinks that unlike the revelations of her American comrades in/without arms, Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning, who changed the world, her own deed has borne no fruit. It has changed nothing.

I want to take issue with that belief. It is not true. Courageous actions like these, committed by dedicated individuals, are never useless.

They stand as an example. They encourage others. They testify for the human conscience. They plant a seed. Just as the sea consists of many drops, historic changes are built up from many, many individual acts like this.

Daphni in court of attacking police. The judge threw the case out.

Daphni in court of attacking police. The judge threw the case out.

I love Daphni Leef. She is the young woman – like Anat, she is 28 years old – who, furious at the rent demanded from her, put up a tent in a boulevard in central Tel Aviv to live in. The protest grew spontaneously and climaxed in an unprecedented mass demonstration of 400 thousand people.

The movement had an impact on last year’s elections. Yair Lapid, a TV personality who had done nothing to help the demonstrators, adopted their slogans and won a huge vote in the election. Two of Daphni’s collaborators were elected to the Knesset. But Daphni herself dropped out of public view.

I never spoke with her except for a few words at one of the demonstrations. I criticized her for ignoring the big national problems, like the occupation, and concentrating on the price of apartments and cheese.

This week she reappeared – on the prisoners’ bench in court. Though all her demonstrations had been strictly non-violent, in one of them some pushing took place. The police mishandled Daphni, her arm was injured. But, as usual, the police blamed Daphni for attacking the policemen and disturbing public order. The Judge threw the case out.

I love these three women, because they show us that in Israel there are young people who obey their conscience. They make us proud to be Israeli.

As long as we have youngsters like these, ready to stand up for democracy, peace and justice, take risks and make personal sacrifices, Israel has a future. For me, they are the real Israel.

Editing:   Jim W. Dean  and  Erica Wissinger

Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within this post are the full responsibility of the author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on February 15, 2014, With 2467 Reads Filed under Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

5 Responses to "Three Women – a Declaration of Love"

  1. Chandler  February 16, 2014 at 8:34 am

    To stand up to authority carries a price. Most Americans would refuse. Most would cower being afraid of losing their job or other. One reason why we are in the shape we are is we don’t stand up and pursue justice. Although these women are to be admired for their fortitude and bravery, if society would not allow them to stand alone and do all they can to support them, NO government or group of dissidents could destroy their futures as what is being done. Lip service support is one thing and is so easy. Standing up for them in return of the favor is the most difficult action any society could take, yet so few do it. Societies leave them to take the punishment by themselves. The hypocrisy is alive and well someplace beside the U.S. If we ALL failed to file with the illegal IRS, what could they do? Together we ALL are strong. Alone these women suffer silently..and we permit it.

    • ani  February 18, 2014 at 12:37 am

      Just ONE of the things that makes Americans cower….MUCH more than most Australians, altho Australians are rapidly falling into the same trap FEAR OF BEING SEEN AS NOT NICE!!

      BEING SEEN AS NICE aka political correct has rendered the developed peeps into sitting ducks for the Big Guns.

      See how NICE they are?

  2. Bente  February 15, 2014 at 2:49 pm

    Thank you Uri for letting us know. And thank you to Noa, Anat and Daphni for your courage, for doing what YOU think is right. And especially to Anat I want to say, like Uri, it is never ever in vain, first of all you have to live with yourself for an eternity – next you might have inspired others who know you or heard of you or will hear of you.

  3. wiggins  February 15, 2014 at 2:31 pm

    It would appear ‘political’ prisoners in the old Soviet Union….are no different to prisoners in the ‘democracy’ of Israel today…big hugs to Tzipi.

    • Michael Farrell  February 15, 2014 at 4:48 pm

      I’ve been reading Masha Gessen’s “Words Can Break Concrete” about Pussy Riot and have been reflecting that the young women were not the people I’d chose to make their case; at the same time, they made it exceptionally well not so much in the direct action but in their response in the trial and in their various appeals and actions since.

      In much the same way, Noa, Anat and Daphni represent perhaps odd choices to be symbols, but symbols they have become. It’s always challenging when faced with the issue of a soldier who reveals classified material and then becomes a prisoner of conscience. But, there’s a huge difference between Bradley Manning and Anat Kim. Manning has a wide variety of issues and didn’t bother to check what he passed to Wikileaks; Ms. Kim was revealing some fairly awful practices of the the Israeli military that violated the reason why Israel was brought into existence in the first place. Every time the Israelis violate the Laws of War or the Declaration of Human Rights or just rules of common decency, they chip away at the foundation of the Jewish state.

      These young women all represent something that we forget at our peril but Israel forgets at it’s immediate risk — the Jewish traditions of liberal thought, action and humanity. If the only reason Israel comes to exist is to be a refuge for Ultra Orthodox Jews supported on the backs of the remainder of the population, it has no reason to exist.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network