9/11 Debate Challenge deadline approaching!


by Kevin Barrett, Editor, Veterans Today


Was Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 remote-hijacked – just like the 9/11 planes? Check out my latest radio interview with David Griscom. Also see my brand-new Press TV article:


Malaysian plane disappearance linked to 9/11

Dr. David Griscom is a highly-rated physicist – and a leading challenger to the official story of 9/11, which he says violates the laws of physics.

Dr. Griscom, together with the Association for 9/11 Truth Awareness (ANETA.org) and Truth Jihad Radio, issued a debate challenge February 20th via the most active anti-9/11-truth website, the James Randi forum. Any qualified physicist who actually believes the official story of 9/11 is invited to step forward and defend those beliefs – and try to win a $1000 prize!

Dr. Griscom can't find a single qualified physicist who thinks the 9/11 official story is compatible with the laws of physics

Dr. Griscom can’t find a single qualified physicist who thinks the 9/11 official story is compatible with the laws of physics

The debate was originally scheduled for March 15th, 2014 at noon Eastern time. We have been looking for a physicist with a Hirsch Index rating over 50 (i.e. a highly qualified physicist in the same league as Dr. Griscom). Unfortunately, there does not seem to be even one highly-qualified physicist in the world who can argue that the official story of 9/11 is permitted by the laws of physics!
The proposed debate question is:


1) The laws of physics were broken by the official story and we need a new investigation
2) The laws were not broken, and everything was explainable. The 9/11 Commission Report is fine as is.

The debate will be 2 hours with three 10 minute breaks every half hour for a total time of 1.5 hours.

The winner will be determined by audience vote and will receive $1000 towards the non-profit charity of his or her choice.


Also note that my own 9/11 debate challenge has been offering $1000 and later $2000 to any University of Wisconsin instructor who can defend the official story of 9/11. This offer has been up for several years, with no takers. Speaks volumes, doesn’t it?


Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:

All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within this post are the full responsibility of the author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on March 12, 2014, With 3963 Reads Filed under Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

34 Responses to "9/11 Debate Challenge deadline approaching!"

  1. YAISHUA MESHICHAINU  March 14, 2014 at 10:31 am

    I’d like to enter the debate contest. I am not a certified Physicist, but I do think I have an iron clad argument for the official version. I will even tell it to you in advance Based on Romans 13, we are told to submit to the ruling authorities, whom God has placed over us to rule for our benefit.

    Since the American rulers have formed commissions and published results confirming their verdict of the 9-11 attacks, we must simply bow our heads and accept. Believe even when science and reason say otherwise. Isn’t that what faith is all about?

    And if I lose the debate then I will simply phone up Dick Cheney and ask him to authorize a drone strike on the audience members.

    I am a graduate of the Founders’ Utterly Comprehensive Knowledge University, better known as F.U.C.K. U.

    • ani  March 18, 2014 at 3:02 am

      funniest comment on Veterans Today!
      Bless You.

  2. Not Convinced  March 13, 2014 at 7:41 pm

    Danielnoel,You are confusing intellectual shortcomings with deliberate lies perpetrated by a hired traitor.

  3. CHuck Feney  March 13, 2014 at 5:57 pm

    The Russians could blow the doors off the PNAC neo-con conspiracy by producing the PNET declarations for the nuclear demolition devices under the WTC. Khalezov says he has seen them.
    Seems like now is a good time to put up!

  4. stephanaugust  March 13, 2014 at 4:44 am

    I noticed a funny thing.

    People brainwashed by Holocaust stories believe the official 9/11 story, while a lot of Holocaust revisionists do not.

    • Not Convinced  March 13, 2014 at 7:00 pm

      Fluoride and microwave exposure does wonders.

  5. Cyprian Crawford  March 13, 2014 at 4:29 am

    12+ years later, and you want to debate the physics behind the destruction of the WTC towers? Anyone can simply look at the videos and see they were blown to smithereens. Stop wasting everyone’s time and talk about something more useful related to 9/11. Why don’t you have a debate about the next 9/11, instead of misdirecting everyone’s attention, dwelling on the minutiae underlying the mechanics of the last 9/11.

    I’ll debate any of the editors here on VT, who are a bunch of disinfo agents and gatekeepers.

    • stephanaugust  March 13, 2014 at 4:37 am

      I just thought about asking you something, it must be telepathy that you are back.

      Have you heard that Hitler’s Third Reich lastet 4.444 days?

    • ani  March 13, 2014 at 10:41 pm

      maybe the word you are looking for is

      which Jung posited to be God

  6. Sic Semper Tyrannis  March 12, 2014 at 8:41 pm

    Not “officially”, but definitely unofficially according to his colleagues in the Senate as was in the case of Senator Paul Wellstone who was killed by Cheney with a high-powered microwave laser that fried his plane’s circuitry when it was approaching for landing at Duluth, Minnesota…

    http //www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-bmmpoDndw

    http //www.wellstonetheykilledhim.com/

    This assassination occurred on October 25th, 2002 – 10 days before the midterm elections. His death handed over control of the Senate from the Democrats to the GOP. He was well ahead of Norm Coleman, his GOP competitor.

    The NTSB could not investigate the crash as a crime because Bush’s Attorney General, Ashcroft, would not declare it a crime scene according to Dr. Jim Fetzer’s research. The fire took 7.5 hours to burn out!

    http //www.youtube.com/watch?v=7N882_77Ig4

  7. joe chuy-medina  March 12, 2014 at 4:44 pm

    Mr Barrett like you, I have done some fairly extensive research, several hundred hours, and believe, from my information, that each plane had the transponders turned off far in advance of the strikes. The ATC’s were following blips on the radar. The commander of NORAD, Eberhardt, testified to the commission in April of 2004, that NORAD had control of the airspace that morning, so, how were any planes hijacked or even flown out of their assigned routes?
    There were no planes. This obviates any debate about how a plane could have punched through at least 6′ of vertical steel, plus several floors of horizontal steel grid under the concrete floors, plus 40-60′ of reinforced concrete 4″ floors. People see the nose of the plan jab through the steel outer walls like a knife stabbing a potato without realizing that the nose piece is fragile plastic.
    As Koestler said, people believe what they want to believe and see what they expect to see or are told to see. In August 2013 a UPS Airbus 300 crashed during slow flight landing, and was broken apart into many pieces when it struck some small trees short of the runway at Birmingham. You may have seen that in USA Today recently. We accept that such a “minor” crash could totally destroy the plane, yet watch the planes strike the Pentagon and the towers without blinking.

    • Not Convinced  March 13, 2014 at 7:22 pm

      They were jet powered, all right. But they were not manned and they were not passenger jets, but looked sort of like passenger jets with bulges under each one that concealed a bunker buster whose uranium penetrator came out of the back of one tower burning bright orange, the spectral signature of uranium. The floor that the missile hit (It was a missle with wings like a buzz bomb or drone.) was used for computer back up batteries and 3 weeks before the batteries had been replaced with thermite in large quantities, not to mention the wiring for demolition and beam cutting with explosive bolts installed that took a minimum of three weeks to accomplish. There were more witnesses killed after the event than victims killed during the event. A little over three hundred sacrifices to Moloch on 9/11, and about three hundred more because they saw detonations in the basement, etc.(The JFK assassination required them to kill about as many witnesses.) This type of grandiose lie is very Talmudic in nature like the inflated figures given by these crypto-jews for the deaths of genuine Jews during the Holocaust. They think we are stupid, that is their weakness, hence CBS still is promoting the “magic.bullet” that supposedly killed JFK and Governor Connaly.

    • Not Convinced  March 13, 2014 at 7:57 pm

      There are large scale holographic projection units possessed by the Government, but they weren’t used in 9/11. They will use them to create the “second coming of Jesus” while the HAARP transmitter fills the citizen’s heads with “divine bliss” and the voice of “Jesus”. Then the faithful will be inspired to attack the enemies of “divinity”. This is very real technology, and it’s ready for deployment.

  8. stephanaugust  March 12, 2014 at 3:34 pm

    Next 9/11?

    Is this a possible candidate?

    “Its maximum length is c.9,000 mi, and its greatest width c.11,000 mi”

    • John Kirby  March 12, 2014 at 8:48 pm

      I give up, what is it?

    • stephanaugust  March 13, 2014 at 4:31 am

      The Pacific Ocean.

      Anyone thinking about a gigantic 900011000 tsunami?

  9. Mulegino  March 12, 2014 at 1:37 pm

    The official 9/11 narrative is nothing but a farrago of wild implausibilities and physical impossibilities, held together with the chicken wire of public ignorance and the spit of corporate media collaboration.

  10. John Kirby  March 12, 2014 at 12:54 pm


    I think that without the internet the official line would have been accepted. In the 12 years since 911 things have changed. If it really was a monstrous false flag event, then the perpetrators got their timing wrong. They could not have seen the coming power of alternative media.

    I am 90% sure somebody is very worried about the outcome, and all the money and influence in the world is not going to protect them. Only a totalitarian state will be able to do that. Is that where we are heading?

    • fred  March 12, 2014 at 2:02 pm

      Its seems the 911 conspiracy has already been REALLY exposed- Building 7 is the elephant in the room. At this point it doesn’t matter if we get a real investigation in my opinion and that could actually add to the diviseness and do more harm than good (Though I’d still like to see an investigation happen deep down inside lol). I mean look at all the JFK divisiveness, More controversy, more wiggle room for the perps.

      The blatant hypocrisy going on now or the rapid influx of people seeking the truth on a wide range of topics on the internet, or the widespread disapproval of congress and Eric Snowden (Wiki pysops), or even the Palestinian cause- all reactions because of the 911 catalysts- the internet truth/ justice seekers.

    • John Kirby  March 12, 2014 at 2:36 pm

      Have any Senators or Representatives expressed doubt about 911 oficially in Congress?

    • stephanaugust  March 12, 2014 at 4:34 pm

      Whatever happens in the world, all politicians are on auto pilot. Same for the mass media. The rest of the world knows the truth.

  11. Kevin Barrett  March 12, 2014 at 12:51 pm

    David Griscom’s hypothesis is that 11 and 175 were (remote?) hijacked and landed as remote-controlled drones crossed paths with them and flew into the Towers. http //911blogger.com/news/2010-12-07/david-griscom-phds-analysis-911-flight-path-anomalies This hypothesis is compatible with all of the above five points, at least until more information about what “not scheduled” entails emerges, which might raise questions about point 1. Scheduled or not, the FAA tracked all four flights from their takeoffs, and 11 and 175 “just happened” to cross paths over an Air Force base – the perfect opportunity for a switcheroo and landing, as Griscom explains.

    • jake gittes  March 12, 2014 at 7:13 pm

      Hey Omniputz.. I thought you were “always polite” here? No, you’re not. YOU are the unmitigated asshole here. How about YOU prove something for once instead of playing the “prove it even more!” game. Everyone here sees through your game. Your shill game ain’t workin, sport.

      Here ya go.. Cry us some big tears for all these little Johnnies and Joanies. Try to debunk this you ass clown — more proof of Sandy Hoax (and Boston Hoax and Colorado Hoax, etc) http //www.dcclothesline.com/2014/03/10/sandy-hook-deception-associated-press-stories-photos-predate-massacre/

  12. Yehuda_Abraham  March 12, 2014 at 12:19 pm

    They won’t accept the challenge because they can’t. Buildings don’t commit suicide and turn into a fine dust for no reason, and anyone with normal IQ knows this. You don’t need a physicist to understand this, you need someone with a room temperate IQ or better.

    Which of course leaves out Onmi-**** and his band of sloped foreheads. Not certain what perverse joy he derives from annoying normal people with his display of ignorance, but perhaps he’ll move on when he realizes that adults post here.

  13. stephanaugust  March 12, 2014 at 11:50 am

    Ahhh, the Great James Randi, a magician proving that the magic used by David Copperfield is only legerdemain.

    • Not Convinced  March 13, 2014 at 7:29 pm

      James Randi=Illuminati Stooge

  14. Mulegino  March 12, 2014 at 11:48 am

    The official narrative of 9/11 is America’s own “Mini-Holocaust”, i.e., an officially irrefutable dogma which cannot be challenged or investigated with any degree of impartiality because this, of course, would constitute an “insult to the victims’ memory”. It is a useful, Sorelian myth which serves as an ideological underpinning for a bellicose foreign policy, the formation of an ever more intrusive (and lucrative) “security state”, the exaltation of Israeli brutality and intransigence as “being tough on the terrorists” and the erosion of traditional rights to privacy and the rule of law.

    Like all such historical mythology- such as the so called “Holocaust”, it is based on being seen from afar, placed on a dogmatic pedestal and characterized by a dreamlike suspension of the laws of reason and simple common sense. It cannot bear the scrutiny of open and honest investigation or debate.
    Tragically, as long as it is kept “sacred and inviolable” in the public imagination, i.e., that preponderance of the public whose event horizon does not extend beyond the “American” entertainment cycle of Super Bowls, Grammys and Oscars- it will be safe.

  15. bobby  March 12, 2014 at 11:38 am

    Ok, sorry everyone, I went into my account on the Tube and although “safety” was off, I turned it on and then back off and I can see the comments again. Sorry again for the false alarm and posting it here but this is the first place I thought of to report this. This CRAP sucks. Now I know a 10th of what the poor North Korean people experience!

  16. bobby  March 12, 2014 at 11:07 am

    Not to change the Topic but this is important. It looks like someone, or entity, has disabled comments on YouTube. Been down for over an hour now, and you can’t even see the old posts. Either they have revoked my freedom of speech, which, I guess I don’t have anyway, or they shut down everyone as it was getting pretty damned heated. Anyone else having trouble or is it just MY computer?

  17. John Kirby  March 12, 2014 at 11:04 am


    The official story is not believable, and you don’t need to be a professor to see that.

  18. potai  March 12, 2014 at 9:23 am

    Yeah, one wonders how the big lie promulgated by the Party can remain in place at all. James Randi, interesting fellow, a professional illusionist (magician) who is also a major player in CSI (Center for Skeptical Inquiry). CSI was founded by Dr. Paul Kurtz (now deceased), a former philosophy professor at SUNY-Buffalo, of jooish ancestry, and clearly a CIA asset. These folks are propagandists who paint themselves as ‘free thinkers’ (skeptics) but they are never skeptical of official government positions. Down with professional magicians and their illusions.

    • Not Convinced  March 13, 2014 at 7:32 pm

      The Magic castle in Hollywood is a center of evil. It’s membership consists of professional magicians. There is something rotten generally about that profession.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network