The Rothschild’s Template for War

by Ian Greenhalgh

Boer War


I’ve always had a passion for history, and I first started to realise how governments and the media collaborate to manufacture “history” through the study of the Boer War.

The Boer War was the first historical incident that I learned was completely different to how the accepted history tells us it was.

The actuality of what happened to provoke that war and who was behind it wasn’t hidden very deeply, in fact it was barely hidden at all.

Cecil Rhodes provoked it by sending 500 heavily armed British mercenaries into the Boer state (The Jameson Raid) in order to provoke a rebellion against the Boer government by the British settlers and merchants living there.

The Boers surrounded this group well short of its objective, forced its surrender and humiliated Rhodes and the British Government. Rhodes knew that all he had to do to conquer the Boer state was provoke war, that was the reason for sending those 500 men, he knew they would not succeed, but he knew that sending 500 Britishers to start an uprising of Britishers in the Boer states would provoke the Boers into taking some action against it’s British minority.

Rhodes could then use his cosy relationship with the British press to spin this into Boer attacks on poor innocent British settlers and that would soon have the British public clamouring for it’s government to send troops to teach these damn Boers a lesson for daring to lay hands on British citizens.

The situation I just described fits exactly into the standard model of regime change that we have seen implemented many times since 1945 by the CIA-M16-Mossad (in reality, they largely operate as a single agency). Let me lay it out in it’s basics:
  1. Send foreign mercenaries into the victim state to foment ‘revolt’.
  2. Provoke the victim state into using its armed forces to oppose the foreign invaders.
  3. Have the media present this lawful defensive action by the victim state as the cruel oppression of a dictatorship.
  4. Send your armed forces to complete the job of regime change.
  5. Establish a new puppet regime with a banking system consisting of a privately held central bank that issues currency on a debt basis, thus enslaving the population.
It really is that simple, and it has been carried out so many times, currently it is being done in Syria, a couple of years ago we saw an absolutely blatant and textbook case in Libya, before that Iraq and Afghanistan.

In the case of the Boer War, the motivating factor was two-fold, firstly, the Boer states were sat on top of one of the largest gold deposits on the globe, with the extra benefit of their being lots of diamonds and other precious minerals.

Secondly, the Boers were a group of Europeans (Dutch Calvanists, French Heugenots, German Protestants) who had turned their back on the established order and had established for themselves an independent homeland outside of the global financial system, they had a government owned and controlled central bank that issued debt-free currency backed by gold, which meant they had zero inflation and zero interest on credit.

Quite obviously, such a state and financial system is diametrically opposed to how the banking systems of all other countries work (at the time of the Boer War, both Britain and the US had currencies backed by gold but neither had a state-owned and controlled central bank) and was not acceptable to the international bankers who control the world – The Rothschilds and their partners/vassals.

It was no secret that Cecil Rhodes worked for the Rothschilds and they were the ones who financed all of his murderous, grandiose plans for imperial conquest and exploitation of native peoples. Therefore the Boer war is a straightforward case of an agent of the Rothschilds using Rothschild money to arm a group of mercenary terrorists then sending these gangsters to attack a state from the inside thus provoking war between the state and the state controlled by the Rothschilds (Britain).

It is no secret that the Rothschilds loaned the British Government money to finance the war so the 1 million British and Empire troops who served in South Africa were effectively mercenaries hired and paid for by the Rothschilds.

Hundreds of thousands of soldiers and civilians died as a result, no-one knows how many Boer civilians died, but at least 30,000 died in the British concentration camps alone, no-one knows how many were killed on their own farms and homesteads.

Therefore, my study of the Boer War lead me to understand how wars are planned, organised, provoked and financed, and who is behind this evil mechanism that slaughters innocent people en-masse in order to funnel all of the world’s gold into the hands of a handful of families who control the world’s financial system.

You can take the pattern I just explained and apply it to almost any conflict since the Boer War, it will fit like a glove.


Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:

All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Some content may be satirical in nature. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within are full responsibility of author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on March 12, 2014, With 9145 Reads Filed under History. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

19 Responses to "The Rothschild’s Template for War"

  1. Chandler  March 13, 2014 at 6:12 pm

    The Rothschild family seems to me to be a tad demented. I find it odd that it is okay for them to have a war plan when if one of us had a war plan, we would be visited by a few loosely hinged men with earphones, and sunglasses. Wouldn’t be too pleasant. So why do the Rothschild’s allowed a war plan? Why doesn’t someone go shoot them up and wipe them out?
    They do not have a inherent right to the throne of any country. Thomas Paine wrote; “Men who look upon themselves born to reign, and others to obey soon grow insolent; selected from the rest of mankind their minds are early poisoned by importance; and the world they act in differs so materially from the world at large, that they have but little opportunity of knowing its true interests, and when they succeed to the government of frequently most ignorant and unfit of any throughout the dominions.”
    Why do we tolerate these Rothschilds? Can the world not survive if they are removed? Remember, resorting to war is a failure of leadership and administration.

  2. LightSaber  March 13, 2014 at 3:49 pm

    Very well written, thank you.

  3. Amanda  March 13, 2014 at 1:02 pm

    Excellent article!. Thanks, Ian.

  4. franktalk  March 13, 2014 at 9:42 am

    Excellent article. The facts of history are rarely exposed by those benefiting from the lies of paid chroniclers of ‘culture’. The truth of the US civil war is far from the favorite books of historians employed in ‘higher learning’ institutions as well. Thank you for disclosing some of the facts.

  5. wiggins  March 13, 2014 at 6:43 am

    This chap gives a very descriptive history of various events from past times appertaining to this story…

    http //

    • Ian Greenhalgh  March 13, 2014 at 9:14 am

      Cheers, I shall check that book out, sounds like my cup of tea.

  6. maria  March 12, 2014 at 11:10 pm

    The first concentration camps, where the English put the Boers in camps, more than 26500 people died, due to the horrible conditions.

  7. Curmudgeon  March 12, 2014 at 7:55 pm

    Mr. Greenhalgh,

    Many, many years ago, I came to the conclusion that all wars were economic wars, whether for land and/or its resources, water and/or its resources, or manufacturing. The notion about war being an extension of diplomacy is a distraction.

    How did I come to that conclusion? It struck me like a thunderbolt when, after sorting through the mumbo jumbo, that the Opium Wars were nor about stopping the opium trade, they were about forcing an addiction to opium on the Chinese. Were the Rothschilds involved? Not at the time. However, David Sassoon, who ordered the war, was much like the Rothschilds in that he sent the sons to other countries in the Orient in order to control the opium trade as the Rothschilds controlled banking in Europe. His granddaughter married a Rothschild, and voilà! 2 of the world’s richest (Jewish) families have gone global.

    • Ian Greenhalgh  March 13, 2014 at 9:18 am

      Yes, I think all wars since the 1700s have been economic. The Opium War is a fine example, and I am sure China has not forgotten how the West treated her.

    • Tiu  March 20, 2014 at 1:08 am

      I’d like to suggest that more than being motivated by economics, the wars since the 80 years war (ending in the early 1700’s) – where the Dutch separated from the Spanish Hapsburgs, wars have been motivated by the ambition for Global Domination. Economics, politics and religion are merely levers to be pulled, or chess pieces to be played.
      When I was a school boy I had a great history teacher who opened our eyes to the Jamieson Raid, but told us we had to use the official, and incorrect version, to fill in the answers in the exams or else we would fail history! South Africa was more than just a big pile of gold and diamonds, it was a strategically vital location in the world where sailing ships were the transport and the Suez canal was still technically running through Ottoman lands (albeit controlled by the French followed by the British [Disraeli brought the canal from the French). The routes to India were vital to the Empire.
      The Rothschilds probably got their initial funds by buying all the looted gold and treasure from all the churches which were looted during the 80 years war, often paying little more than bottles of cheap Portuguese Port (fortified wine) to the rebels who were, from the sound of it, often motivated by little more. By the end of the 80 years war the Dutch William of Orange was placed on the British throne (with the help of John Churchill, first Duke of Marlborough) followed by the German Georges (descendents of the Electors of Paletine, from their HQ in Hannover). British monarchy has seldom been “British” since the time of the Romans.

    • ani  March 20, 2014 at 1:35 am

      Thank you for this slice of history Tiu.

      I do not know where you are, or where you went to school, but I am Dutch-born, Australian raised and as an army wife travelled the globe; even ‘served’ in Hannover and Hamburg districts, where curiously, my father had served (unbeknownst to me in the seventies) in Hitler’s Labour camps as an adolescent. I was forever in trouble for asking the pesky questions that got me into s o o much trouble. But I wanted to know, initially, why my mother was blue-eyed blonde and my father olive-skinned, brown eyes. After a Life-time, I am here to say that Perseverance and Faith pay off.

  8. Blake Hamilton  March 12, 2014 at 6:29 pm

    The role the Rothschilds play in our banking system today is that since the Rothschilds secured the control of the Bank of England in 1815 and from that moment they have never looked back. A book well worth reading is the House of Rothschild by Niall Ferguson. In the 19th ce the Rothschilds were very explicit about their power and everyone knew of them but after the Anglo-Boer war which they pushed the British Govt into defeating the Boers in order to get control of the goldmines they stepped back & adopted a very low profile & it suits them that way. You will never see a Rothschild listed on the Fortune 500 for that very reason. The current ownership of the US Fed is 58% Rothschild & the rest are JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs and other smaller banks.

    • Ian Greenhalgh  March 12, 2014 at 6:42 pm

      Nice comment Blake. The Rothschild rise to power occurred in the years 1776-1815. 1776 of course was the American Revolution, and the British Crown hired large numbers of Hessian mercenaries to fight that war. The Rothschilds were the bankers for the Elector of Hesse and profited greatly from the influx of British capital to pay for those mercenaries. The Rothschilds sent out their sons to establish banking houses in London, Paris, Vienna and the London branch became the most powerful due to their profiteering from the Napoleonic Wars. The event of 1815 you mention, was of course, the Battle of Waterloo. The Rothschilds in London spread the false rumour that Napoleon had won that battle, causing financiers to dump their stockholdings on the market at well below market value; the Rothschilds bought up these shares. When the news of the real result of the battle reached London, those stocks and shares regained their full value and overnight the Rothschilds had profitted immensely from them. You are correct also about the Rothschilds moving out of the public eye as the 19th century drew to a close, they employed agents like Cecil Rhodes to give them a degree of separation and anonymity.

    • Blake Hamilton  March 12, 2014 at 7:45 pm

      Very informative thanks.

    • stephanaugust  March 13, 2014 at 4:27 am

      I wonder if the way the Rothschilds sent out their sons could be compared with how first level ponzi schemers in multi level marketing pyramid structures sent out their executives.

      I know a story of the German Objektive Vermögensberatung OVB (i.e. Objective Investment Counseling), co-founded by Otto Wittschier, Bruno Toennes und Bert Schwarz from Bernie Cornfields Investors Overseas Services IOS, that OVB executives did that by placing a map on a dartboard.

    • stephanaugust  March 13, 2014 at 4:29 am

      Oh, and as incentives for executives not making enough money they invited ugly whores.

    • Ian Greenhalgh  March 13, 2014 at 9:13 am

      I think the sending out of the 4 sons is very similar to that, yes. It was the spreading of a crime family to the major centres of power of the time in order to infiltrate the heart of the richest and most powerful empires.

  9. stephanaugust  March 12, 2014 at 4:10 pm

    Thank you.

    • Ian Greenhalgh  March 12, 2014 at 5:34 pm

      You are most welcome.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network