The Jewish Question: A Problem without a Solution (Part 1)

Part 1: The Jewish Problem in Historical Perspective

“As far as I know, no one has ever come up with an effective solution to the Jewish problem. Solving the riddle of the Sphinx would be easier.”


. . . by  Lasha Darkmoon

“Wherever the Jew is found he is a problem, a source of unhappiness to himself and to those around him.” — Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles

“Wherever the Jew is found he is a problem, a source of unhappiness to himself and to those around him.” — Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles

1. Why all attempts to solve the Jewish Problem have failed

The Jewish Problem, more commonly and euphemistically known as the “Jewish Question“, has agitated the minds of political analysts throughout history but has remained unresolved to this day.

For centuries, a ready and makeshift solution to the problem consisted in the mass expulsion of the Jews.

Just get rid of the Jews, it was thought, and the problem would go away. This didn’t work. The Jews simply migrated and created problems elsewhere. And then, after a few years, their descendants came trickling back into the same countries from which their ancestors had been forcibly evicted.

Here is Queen Maria Theresa in a decree dated 1777, during the heyday of the Enlightenment period. The Queen of Austria-Hungary, Croatia, Bohemia, Mantua, Milan, Galicia, Parma and the Austrian Netherlands had grown weary of the Jews and the never-ending problems they had caused in her extensive dominions. Her expulsion order is typical of the many others  issued by other countries before her time, so we shall quote the angry queen in her own words:

“Henceforth no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to remain here without my written permission. I know of no other troublesome plague within the state than this race, which impoverished the people by their fraud, usury and money-lending and commits all deeds which an honorable man despises. Subsequently they have to be removed and excluded from here as much as possible.”  (See here)

Timeline of Jewish expulsions

Though Jews have been expelled from 109 locations from AD 250,
expulsion failed to solve the Jewish Problem.

The next attempted solution to the Jewish problem, primarily advocated by the Jews themselves and their philosemitic supporters, was complete emancipation of the Jews.

It was widely believed that if their crippling disabilities were removed, and if Jews were made equal citizens, that the Jewish problem would just “disappear” — especially with assimilation. The Jew’s antisocial behavior, it was argued, was the natural result of his unfair treatment. Treat him well and he would behave properly.

It was always understood that assimilation was a necessary precondition for Jewish  emancipation. In order to become equal citizens, Jews had to promise to fit in with the society around them and become part of a happy and homogenous whole.

They were told: intermarry with the natives, convert to Christianity, learn the language of the country, dress like other people, adopt the manners and customs of those around you, and, above all, take a back seat and keep out of trouble.

It was a rare Jew who followed all these instructions to the letter. Some refused to follow any. As for the final injunction — take a back seat and keep out of trouble — most Jews found this impossible to keep. It ran against the grain of their nature. It was almost like expecting a cat not to kill birds or a fox not to raid the hen house.

The Jews received their first emancipation in France. This was in 1791 after the French Revolution, a catastrophic event engineered by Masonic secret societies in which the Jews featured predominantly and wielded the most influence. Several other revolutions were to follow in the nineteenth and early twentieth century. All of these, without exception, were masterminded by Jews.

“At the front of every one of these revolutionary movements for the destruction of authority, nationhood and religion,” noted an eminent elder statesman, “you find a Jew.”

These inflammatory words were written by Benjamin Disraeli, Prime Minister of England, himself a Jew who had converted to Christianity.

Emancipation proceeded at a rapid rate in country after country throughout the 19th century. Far from “solving” the Jewish problem, this merely made matters worse. This was because Jewish emancipation inevitably led to Jewish supremacy.

Every single country that emancipated its Jews was soon taken over by Jews.

In Russia, the Jews took their emancipation by force. This was in 1917 after the Bolshevik Revolution: an event carefully planned, financed, and largely administered by Jews from New York. Communism was then ushered in, the Pale of Settlement abolished, and Jews thereafter emigrated in swarms to the United States, Canada, South America, various other European countries, and, finally, to Palestine — where they immediately began to make themselves a thorough nuisance to the Arabs.

Did emancipating the Jews in Russia solve the Jewish problem? No, it did not. It made matters infinitely worse: not only in Russia but in every single country to which these refugees from the Pale of Settlement came with their beaky noses under black hats, their raggedy beards, their wild eyes, and their clackclacking Yiddisher tongues.

The Red Terror was soon to follow. The Russian peasants, who constitued 90 percent of the population at that time, were massacred in their millions, with Jewish commissars in the vanguard giving the orders to kill. Blood ran in rivers through the streets of Moscow and St Petersburg, much to the delight of psychopaths like Leon Trotsky, Lazar Kaganovich, and Ilya Ehrenberg — all of them Jews with lots of blood on their hands.

Over 66 million Russian Christians, according to Solzhenitsyn, were genocided by an essentially Jewish regime in the Soviet Union between 1917 and 1953. In comparison, the French Revolution had been a nun’s picnic.

emancipation of jews, timeline

Here is the psychopathic Leon Trotsky (pictured),  shortly after the violent emancipation of Jews in Russia that followed in the wake of the Bolshevik Revolution (1917):

“We must turn Russia into a desert populated by white negroes upon whom we shall impose a tyranny such as the most terrible Eastern despots never dreamt of…. We shall shed such floods of blood as will make all the human losses suffered in the capitalist wars pale by comparison…. By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence.”  (Full quote here)

— From the ‘Memoirs of Aron Simanovich’, quoted in The Nature of Zionism by Vladimir Stepin, Moscow, 1993, and translated from Russian into English by Clive Lindhurst.

2.  Zionism promoted as a solution to the Jewish Problem

A new “cure” for the Jewish problem was offered by Theodor Herzl in the late 1890s: Zionism. “Give us a country of our own,” the Zionists said in so many words, “and this will solve the Jewish problem.”

Quite simply, the idea was this: if Jews were given their own country, they would all go and live there and get out of everyone’s way. It was thought that the removal of their presence from every country, as they proceeded to settle in their new homeland, Israel, would solve the Jewish problem once and for all.

The formula was axiomatic and self-evident: No Jews, no Jewish Problem.

Is it anti-Semitic to say this? No, it is not, given that the pioneers of Zionism put forward exactly the same idea in different words. They demanded a separate Jewish homeland for Jews on the grounds that Jews were a headstrong and highly-strung race incapable of living in other people’s countries without creating problems sooner or later. The Talmudic mentality insisted: we Jews will not take orders from our inferiors.

Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizmann, wrote in his memoirs:

“Whenever the quantity of Jews in any country reaches the saturation point, that country reacts against them. [This] reaction…cannot be looked upon as anti-Semitism in the ordinary or vulgar sense of that word; it is a universal social and economic concomitant of Jewish immigration, and we cannot shake it off. —  Chaim Weizmann, Trial and Error (1949). Quoted in Albert S. Lindemann’s The Jew Accused, 1991 (p. 277).

Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, had himself made the same point much earlier. “Anti-Semitism,” he wrote, is “an understandable reaction to Jewish defects.” And in his diary he added: “I find the anti-Semites are fully within their rights.” (See here)

It has long been recognized by intelligent Jews that mutual antagonism between Jew and gentile is only to be expected, and that any attempt to achieve lasting peace and harmony between the two groups is doomed to failure. “I do not believe that the primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable,” Jewish author Maurice Samuel points out in his book You Gentiles. “You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact.”  (See here)

3.  Why Zionism failed to solve the Jewish problem

Zionism seemed a neat solution to the Jewish problem initially. This was because, on the one hand, it meant that the Jews got their own country; and, on the other, it meant that non-Jews got rid of Jews and no longer had to put up with their pesky presence — which, as both Herzl and Weizmann had already conceded, was the root cause of anti-Semitism.

And so it came about that Zionism was widely seen in these early days as an original and workable solution to the Jewish problem, even though Zionism meant stealing Arab land on which to park this recalcitrant race of rootless cosmopolitans.

The awkward question nevertheless needs to be asked: did Zionism actually succeed in solving the Jewish problem, as it was widely expected to do? No, unfortunately it did not. Like all other solutions hitherto tried, Zionism was to prove an abysmal failure.

This was because Jewish leaders reneged on their implicit promise, or rather on the tacit understanding, that those who are given a homeland are under obligation to go and live there. The Jews were expected to emigrate to Israel en masse, thereby solving the Jewish Problem by removing the root cause of the problem, i.e., themselves: meaning, their presence in other people’s countries as undesirable maladapts.

The Jews’ reluctance to emigrate to Israel en masse after 1948 defeated the whole purpose of giving them their own country in the first place. It made a mockery of Zionism and its rationale.

There are almost as many Jews in North America today (5.8 million) as there are in Israel (5.9 million). An enormous  40 percent of world Jewry now choose to live in the United States. Vast numbers of Jews moreover  continue to live in other people’s countries where they continue to excite anti-Semitism by their domineering presence, their over-representation in key professions, their tendency to network, and their constant involvement in fraud and financial scams.

This was not as it was meant to be. Why give the Jews a homeland if they refuse to live there? Why buy a man a horse, you might similarly ask,  if he refuses to ride it?

So here we are now: at this awkward impasse.

By giving the Jews Israel, the Brits and the Americans possibly made history’s most costly mistake. No decision they could have made is likely to have more catastrophic consequences. The Jews now have nuclear weapons. More than once, they have threatened the world with their Samson Option, i.e., world annihilation if ever Israel is existentially threatened. And needless to say, they are currently engaged in the ongoing genocide of the Palestinians, a people whose only crime is that they happen to own the land the Jews covet.

Adolf Hitler once described America as the Jews’ “new hunting grounds”. I apologize for quoting the most hated man in history, but it seems there were times when Hitler actually hit the nail on the head. With remarkable prescience, he saw that the state of Israel would one day develop into organized Jewry’s international crime base from which it would plunder other countries, including America, with impunity:

“It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.”  — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter 11


In 1946 the Jews owned 6 percent of Palestine.
Today they occupy (illegally) roughly 90 percent.

ISRAEL TODAY ” . . . a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.” — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

” . . . a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.”
— Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

In his final years, Stalin appears to have developed a negative attitude toward Israel, seeing it as a giant military base run by a Jew-controlled America that would one day threaten the vital interests of the Soviet Union. Before he could do anything about it, Stalin was assassinated.

The one man who could have stopped international Jewry in its tracks, as it ran its  rollercoaster ride to world domination with the United States as its battering ram, had been secretly poisoned to death — either by Beria, thought by many to be Jewish, or by another Jew in Stalin’s entourage.

The date of Stalin’s death, March 1, 1953, happened by a strange coincidence to fall on the Jewish feast of Purim.

International Jewry today continues its triumphant march in North America, Europe and elsewhere.

Continued in Part 2: Seven Drastic Remedies for the Jewish Problem

Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:

All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Some content may be satirical in nature. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within are full responsibility of author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on June 18, 2014, With 10098 Reads Filed under Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

64 Responses to "The Jewish Question: A Problem without a Solution (Part 1)"

  1. IsItSomethingISaid  July 28, 2016 at 12:41 pm

    “Emancipation” as related to the Jews.

    When I first became “Jew”/Khazarian-wise “emancipation,” as it relates to the Khazarians, meant “freeing of.”

    As I studied he Khazarians and their history, the image of them in my psyche began to shift from that of people to that of parasites–a tapeworm to be exact. This happened quite unconsciously. Then as I became even more enlightened as to the true nature of the Khazarians, the image, word, idea of them began to shift again, to that of a virus. A virus, like the Khazarians, is never really alive unless it has infected a organism’s cells and is then destroying both.

    With this further shift, I came then to view “emancipation,” as it applies to the Khazarians, as the “losing of.” The losing of a virus upon mankind.

  2. John Kirby  June 21, 2014 at 10:37 pm

    Hi Lindsay, I did not know that Ezra Pound had come out against the Jews. I had only vaguely heard of him as a poet. I had a science education.

    • ani  June 21, 2014 at 10:52 pm

      You see how we get locked into our spheres of expertise, and then wonder why we do not understand what is going on in the wider world?

      It has taken me a long time also, but a few years ago I learned a great deal about Ezra Pound and Eustice Mullins. Do look them up. Their stories alone will show you how successful are the ‘elite’ in vaporising/destroying/discrediting dissenters. Not only has no one actually succeeded in their stand against them, ‘they’ have in recent decades destroyed the best parts of the Middle East.
      Only North Korea, Cuba and Iran left.

  3. Snoopy  June 21, 2014 at 4:13 pm

    A pet theory of mine is the Elders game theoried their way to the conclusion that for the Goyim there is only one permanant and lasting solution to the Jewish problem – extermination – and so to preclude such a event they have screamed, schemed, and falsely accused their opponents of such an activity as part of a psychological warfare strategy.

    • Snoopy  June 21, 2014 at 4:16 pm

      Personally I don’t subscribe to such a remedy. However I am for deZionificiation of the world in EXACTLY the same manner and method they employed deNAZIfication at the end of WWII, complete with gallows filled with the ringleaders

  4. ani  June 21, 2014 at 3:29 pm

    Looney Tunes get Loonier
    http //

  5. John Kirby  June 21, 2014 at 3:21 pm

    The US media will not discuss anything critical of Jews/ Israel. This is a big factor in resentment of Jewish power. They control the media, the money and the Congress, but nobody dare say it. The greatest crimes of the 20th century, those of the Bolsheviks against the Russian people were conducted by Jews, but nobody dare say it. The Jews used terrorism to steal a country, Palestine, but nobody dare say it. Israel has nuclear weapons, but nobody dare say it.

  6. John Kirby  June 21, 2014 at 2:10 am

    I get the impression that there is a turning against Jewish Power. For me it was in the 1990s when I began to realize just how great Jewish power was. Since then we have had the wars against Islam, blatantly fomented by Jewish neocons in the heart of government. Twenty years ago you could not even mention Jewish Power, but now, especially since the bailout of the banks in 2008, you can, and people will agree.

    The Holocaust has been at the heart of Jewish victimhood, but it is now becoming clear that it has been greatly exaggerated and sanctified by the media, and that the role of Jews in the mass murder of tens of millions of Russians before WW2 is more than enough to wipe out Jewish holier-than-thou arrogance.

    • John Kirby  June 21, 2014 at 2:31 am

      I would add that organized religion seems to be declining as more people see that the Jews invented a religion to place themselves above the rest of humanity, to carry out genocidal conquest.

      I now do not believe a word of the Old Testament, and have my doubts about most of the New Testament. I think the prophets were probably hallucinating, due to drugs or schizophrenia.

    • Lindsay Newton  June 21, 2014 at 4:39 am

      And I quote…
      “No Rothschild is English… No Baruch, Morgenthau, Cohen, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Kahn, Schiff, Sieff or Solomon was ever born Anglo-Saxon. And it is for this filth that you fight. It is for this filth that you murdered your Empire. It is this filth that elects, selects, your politicians.”
      – Ezra Pound, March 15, 1942 radio broadcast

    • John Kirby  June 21, 2014 at 10:38 pm

      Hi Lindsay, I did not know that Ezra Pound had come out against the Jews. I had only vaguely heard of him as a poet. I had a science education.

    • John Kirby  June 21, 2014 at 10:50 pm

      Regarding the battle going on above on Facebook “Wait until you see what I’m going to do to yer onomy

    • J.M.  June 21, 2014 at 10:24 am

      Thank you for the comment. My take on the “question” (what a euphemism) in relation to the West’s attempts to deal with it

      What the West intended was one thing, what the zionists intended and have unswervingly worked to realize is another. Attempts to deal with the problem have mattered little in the face of the tribe’s warlike nature and its deeply internalized prophecies/tribal orders and commitments which serve that nature, promising Supremacy and Treasure over all others. Gentiles who have wanted to solve the problem have consistently failed to see through Deception and correctly estimate the basic features and extent of it — thereby unable to do what was needed.

      “By way of deception thou shalt do war.”

    • J.M.  June 21, 2014 at 10:20 am

      Well said – thanks!

    • J.M.  June 24, 2014 at 11:52 am

      Opinion What the West intended was one thing, what the zionists intended and have unswervingly worked to realize is another. Attempts to deal with the problem have mattered little in the face of the tribe’s warring nature and its deeply internalized prophecies/tribal orders and commitments which serve that nature, promising Supremacy and Treasure over all others. Gentiles who have wanted to solve the problem have consistently failed to see through Deception and correctly estimate the basic features and extent of it — thereby unable to do what was needed.

      “By way of deception thou shalt do war.”

      The Jews seem to be dramatizing, over and over, their expulsion from Egypt (or Khazar land – same story) … making themselves (wherever they are in large enough numbers) unbearable, being driven out, only to reincarnate elsewhere and continue as before.

      This is not all Jews, but those who identify with the group understandably have a difficult time distancing themselves from its core agenda. Benjamin Freedman genuinely renounced that identification and one can hear it in his speech below. Many others, critical of Israeli’s policies, nevertheless serve as its gatekeepers, some perhaps unconsciously. They are not change-makers, however pleasing their rhetoric.

      https //

  7. Mike Kay  June 20, 2014 at 7:37 pm

    Duality arose within human consciousness approximately 8,000 years ago. Perhaps the seminal event marking this change in consciousness was the rise of Zoroaster, and the teachings of this prophet of dualism, Zoroastrianism.
    Zoroaster induced the split in the Magi between the true mystics and the servants of nascent civilization. Ever since, humanity has been plagued by the strange idea that knowledge must somehow serve the temporal structure. This upside down oppressive ideology is at the heart of every major religion today.
    Human history is largely a sad repetition of utter stupidity and failed potential. I find it amazing that so many squareheads find reason to defend that which has robbed them of everything, including sense.
    For further research, you could look into Greek rationalism, as perhaps the most extant literary record of the brain split you write about…The advent of the “I” as a unique and independent entity was a phenomenon of Appolonian logic, and with it came the cult of Narcissus, which we are still plagued with at this late hour.

    • Mike Kay  June 21, 2014 at 5:22 pm

      Well, today the word MYTH is a synonym for LIE.
      Few question this abuse of language, yet it seems to have arisen with the myth of the unliving, mechanical universe, a mode of thought cultivated by the church and embraced by the current monotheism of today-science.
      In reality the polarity presented of a religious world view and a scientific one is no polarity at all. Both are monotheistic, both claim absolute dominance, both demand that you accept their world view without question.
      The OT is a condensation of a distilled tradition common across the Levant. It is not, strictly speaking jewish, in that it originated outside the jewish experience, was codified without jewish participation, and was only later embraced and expounded upon by jewish thought.
      Similarly, the NT was an a cultural amalgam of a variety of proto-christian contributors, from the Johannites to the Romans, who upon codifying their separation from judaism, detested it.
      I have to disagree that a political solution is possible with the jewish question. History is laden with political attempts toward solution, and in each case, the parasitic nature of the destroyer class was marked, noted, and defined, without resolution.
      Western civilization has attempted to remove itself from its jewishness, and lately, attempted to embrace it, yet it is in the very structure of western civilization where the weakness lies, and the problem cannot be solved without solving for a much wider paradigm.

  8. Worker Bee  June 19, 2014 at 5:51 pm

    “Here is Queen Maria Theresa in a decree dated 1787…”

    1744 perhaps, since she died in 1780?

    • Lasha Darkmoon  June 20, 2014 at 4:44 am

      @ Worker Bee

      Many thanks for this correction! I gave the wrong date. I should have written 1777, not 1787. Maybe it was a typo…? I’ve now corrected the mistake.

      http //

  9. Mike Kay  June 19, 2014 at 3:53 pm

    Ms. Darkmoon,
    A factual and comprehensive piece.
    Unfortunately, no product of western civilization can see that the jew merely exploits the weaknesses of that civilization. Western civ. is founded on principles of dominion and control, and the jew, like any good parasite, has crafted a method for feeding on the sap of these principles.
    It is no coincidence that the bloody genocide which destroyed pre-christian Europe, exterminated the warrior ethic-and replaced it with that of the soldier, suddenly found itself at the mercy of the jew.
    Jews never penetrated into Europe until invited by the sweet spoils of christian society.
    Thus, the approach to the jewish problem has always been one to seek to remove the parasite, but never one to inoculate the host. The inability of the christian mind to comprehend polyvalence builds a simplistic and infantile manner of approaching reality-exactly that type of approach which is lamb to the slaughter for the parasite.
    The christian mind arose from jewish roots. Thus the jew has quite a leg up in understanding how to manipulate and destroy it. Thus we observe Blankfein proclaiming on national tv that he is doing gods’ work, and watch the ranks of insouciant christians get all warm and fuzzy inside.

  10. dalethorn  June 19, 2014 at 3:30 pm

    When I was little, we read from Joshua a lot in Church and especially Sunday School. The instructions from God to the Israelis were very explicit and unambiguous Go into each city of Canaan and 1) Create a ruse to draw the fighting men out of the city. 2) Ambush the fighting men and kill them. 3) Go into the city and kill everyone within. 4) Loot the city of its valuables. 5) Burn the city to the ground to destroy the evidence of what happened. Today we call that genocide, unless of course we’re Christian Zionists who believe whole-heartedly in nuking the infidels, i.e. the enemies of Zionism. In Gulf War I, Ted Koppel interviewed Bibi Netanyahu and asked him “What do you tell your children about the war”? Bibi answered “I read to them from the book of Joshua”. So while more rational people may say that “Joshua is just a story”, in reality the man with hundreds of nuclear bombs believes it. (Or rather, believes “in” it.)

  11. darrelld  June 19, 2014 at 2:44 pm

    The problem with the jews is encapsulated in the moral and philosophical maxim, “The corruption of what is best becomes the worst.” The jewish problem is ultimately a theological one. By rejecting, and even hating Christ, they have consequently become subverters of the moral order as well, and the “synagogue of Satan”. And the only effective solution to the jewish problem in history has been the policy enacted by Pope Gregory IX in his “Sicut Judeis non”. Look it up or see E Michael Jones’s book on the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. Also Jonas Alexis’s articles here.

  12. captain obvious  June 19, 2014 at 11:09 am

    that belief of superiority combined with the OK to exploit-harm their “lessers” leaves them worse than being simply racist, and the harm they have caused to TRUE semites is even crazier. the 66+ million killed in Russia wasnt a HOLOCAUST? screw it, they’re ANTI-CHRIST-ANIC, can only mean luciferian, lying, thieving, murdering psychopaths claiming racial religious superiority aka “God’s Chosen”, toss em out of airplanes maybe GOD will let them float back to the ground intact? they wouldnt HAVE this kind of power if not for promoting thin air printed paper notes as being valuable, and denouncing THAT would itself be a viable solution. if you grow food and they cant buy it what happens? same thing they are doing to US!

  13. ptwang  June 19, 2014 at 1:42 am

    I find it interesting that Jews rarely get involved in debating these topics – surely at least the anti-Zionist Jews would want to chime in to try distance themselves from the nasty elements of their religion as Muslims often do when duped into believing extremist Muslims are behind so much terrorism.

    • Worker Bee  June 19, 2014 at 5:32 pm

      “…surely at least the anti-Zionist Jews would want to chime in to try distance themselves from the nasty elements of their religion…”

      Read your Atzmon.

      I suspect that most Jews that get sick of the behavior just leave the 13th Tribe and join the goyim.

  14. John Kirby  June 18, 2014 at 10:12 pm

    Jews control the media, the money and the Congress, but nobody dare say it. The greatest crimes of the 20th century, those of the Bolsheviks against the Russian people were conducted by Jews, but nobody dare say it. The Jews stole a country, Palestine, and by association have made America the enemy of muslims, but nobody dare say it.

    The power and arrogance of the Jewish Lobby may bring a great calamity onto America, and the Jews

  15. Bartered  June 18, 2014 at 9:25 pm

    “The Red Terror was soon to follow. The Russian peasants, who constitued 90 percent of the population at that time, were massacred in their millions, with Jewish commissars in the vanguard giving the orders to kill. Blood ran in rivers through the streets of Moscow and St Petersburg, much to the delight of psychopaths like Leon Trotsky, Lazar Kaganovich, and Ilya Ehrenberg — all of them Jews with lots of blood on their hands.”

    This should be a warning if Alex Jones and his ilk pick up too many followers.

  16. Bartered  June 18, 2014 at 9:14 pm

    Anonymous is very very envious.

    • Anne Beckett  June 20, 2014 at 8:45 am

      I find it humorous that you use an anonymous nom, “bartered”. yet call out someone else for doing same? Does this mean you are envious of the writer?

    • Bartered  June 21, 2014 at 6:12 pm

      I don’t recall dissing anyone for using a, whats that word, pseudonym. If I did it was a mistake. In reference to Anonymous an organization that isn’t an organization, but a voluntary group consisting of individuals that don’t know each other. Zionism works the same way. At least to my shallow understanding.

  17. Lindsay Newton  June 18, 2014 at 7:50 pm

    To Quote Jim Stone………….
    The Jewish community hates America more than they hate any other nation. They ARE NOT our friends. They have succeeded in infiltrating the government and military to the highest levels. Americans are NOT running the country.
    It is the goal of the Jewish community to, through demoralization of the population, exportation of industry, destruction of education, destruction of the mind via tainted vaccines and antidepressants, and total taxation with no legitimate representation for those who pay the taxes, to permanently and irrevocably destroy America and draw America into the New World Order. That is what we are dealing with here.

    • Anne Beckett  June 20, 2014 at 8:57 am

      Well, as the Jewish-lobbies, such as AIPAC (Ape-Pac) and the ADL, etc.., run the show behind, “our government”, and our country is in such trouble and only worsening over the recent decades, yes. I would agree they hate America. And once they have succeeded in destroying the economy and all natural resources throughout the land, they can and will leave for the nation they have stolen Palestine. We should have had no hand in assisting them murder Palestinian Muslims and Christians, and even more swarthy (honestly born as) Jews of the land. That we have continued, since the forties (or before- with the Stern Gang), through today, really bothers me.
      And who sends munitions and men and women there to help the poor put-upon Jews? OUR(??) Congress and OUR(???) White-house. Is this good for US/USA? Of course not. All people in the Mid-East believe Americans hate them and wish to kill them. With American-made bombs and mortars killing their children and other family members and friends, what else are they to think?
      I cannot tell you how many Middle-Eastern people I’ve spoken with who were shocked that I am American and I do NOT hate them.

  18. Preston James, Ph.D  June 18, 2014 at 7:30 pm

    A most outstanding article typically the highest quality work imaginable, from Lasha Darkmoon, who always distills these matters down to their very essence. I can’t wait for part two. Highest commendations for this kind of work.

  19. Worker Bee  June 18, 2014 at 6:57 pm

    The tone of this article (e.g. …their beaky noses under black hats, their raggedy beards, their wild eyes, and their clackclacking Yiddisher tongues.”) as well as linking to Metapedia (this is a link in the linked article ****http // will provide cause to those who call VT “antisemitic”.

    Thankfully, the same tone is not present in most of the other articles on VT that justly criticize Zionism, Jewish culture, tribalism, and/or religion.

    • Anne Beckett  June 20, 2014 at 9:01 am

      This was not the tone of the article. And that quote came from a Jew; Theodore Hertzl. If one cannot use a Jew’s words in an article about Jews, just how sensitive has this nation/world become? It is time to throw out that inane term. “anti-Semite”, and for many reasons. Number one, Semites are Palestinians. Most Jews are not Palestinian (though some are). Those who are actually get harassed nearly as much as other Palestinians within Palestine.

    • Worker Bee  June 20, 2014 at 8:55 pm

      The description was not presented as a quote by Herzl (which would certainly alter the tone). There is also too much generalization of Jews as if they had homogeneous behavior and thoughts. Truth is, most Jews are used and abused almost as much as the goyim by there self-appointed “leadership” – the practice is not new either ****http //

      Gilad Atzmon defines antisemite as a person the Jews do not like, which fits the modern usage.

  20. ani  June 18, 2014 at 6:24 pm

    Wow Simpleton You have really hit Your stride with recent comments. Fantastic!
    Well said and Thank You.

  21. Yehuda_Abraham  June 18, 2014 at 3:19 pm

    I know that hyperlinks often fall victim to VT’s auto filters, but the link below is to Hitler’s last political writing,

    If anything about what he stated is wrong, 70 years later, I’d sure like to hear about it.

    ***http //***

    • Bartered  June 18, 2014 at 9:11 pm

      His speeches with subtitles on you tube are amazing, especially the one where he complains about the West being friendly when they offer money, and angry when he refuses.

    • Tiu  June 18, 2014 at 10:36 pm

      The amazing thing is that the west paid huge amounts of money to Adolph, especially the Americans, British and French, either in cold hard cash or in commodities. The American’s lent him the money to make Germany’s WW1 reparations, which were handled by setting up the BIS (Bank for International Settlement)… but which were never full paid and the BIS is now the Central Bank for Central Banks e.g. they control the worlds economy. I’m not aware of any information that indicates that America received any repayment for its loans either.
      The tax payer has been subsidizing the problem and paying for the solution (in blood and money) for quite a few generations now. When will they wake up?

    • Bartered  June 21, 2014 at 6:15 pm

      In the 1930’s the guy was a hero. The French girl that bore his son would be a very very proud mother IF the banks did not turn on him. The media machine.

    • Bartered  June 21, 2014 at 7:13 pm

      The banks were upset because he refused their usury. If any money was transferred it was on Hitlers terms, not the banks.

  22. Yehuda_Abraham  June 18, 2014 at 3:05 pm

    I see I was beaten to the punch by ptwang, but s/he is right. You have nothing to apologize for when examining Hitler’s words in the context of the time, and how prophetic he was proven to be today.

    Search Daily Mail, JFK secretly admired Hitler, or Kennedy’s own work, Profiles In Courage.

  23. sysyphus  June 18, 2014 at 10:43 am

    Emotional logic is what got us into this mess. Rational logic, albeit ruthless, is what will get us out. Remember that Joe Stalin was somebody’s baby once, and he loved children… we are not responsible for the reputation of the Zeeps. They are, and if they don’t like it, THEY can change the way they treat the Palestinians.
    They are not “victims” of a blame game. They are deserving of blame and hiding behind childish rhetoric will not spare them the consequences of what THEY do, whether or not “Kings and Queens loved Jews when they borrowed money from them…”
    Remember the Bible? Perhaps you should read what was said about them 2000 years ago… they haven’t changed.

    • Simpsons Donkey  June 19, 2014 at 6:57 pm

      These are the words of the Roman judge asked by the Pharisees to punish twelve-year-old Jesus of Nazaeth, after he confounded them in theological debate
      “He shall take the salvation from you Jews, and give it to us heathen, and you
      shall be trodden under our heavy heels even in this His time, and dust and ashes shall
      we throw upon this place where you allow yourselves to be praised, yea formerly
      even adored as gods by the infatuated people.”
      from ‘Three Days in the Temple’ transcribed by the servant of God Jacob Lorber. first edition 1932

  24. caribbeancritic  June 18, 2014 at 10:08 am

    Mass expulsion of these dirty lying animals has never been the solution I speak as a member of the Goyim Guardsmen mass extermination is the only way!

    • DaveE  June 18, 2014 at 1:41 pm

      Since the Jews declared war on the US on 9/11/2001, we certainly have every right to treat them as the enemy within our gates.

    • Paul V. Sheridan  June 21, 2014 at 9:52 pm

      We must NEVER forget these five names Oded Ellner, Paul Kurzberg, Sivan Kurzberg, Omer Marmari and Yaron Shmuel !

      Recent piece by Anthony Lawson here (above five mentioned about half way)
      youtube Xs1L4nVRWXM

      Recent A&E piece intro to Sept 2104 release here youtube 4f-O-RnCPtE

  25. davor  June 18, 2014 at 9:16 am

    It is incredible for example how cities like Riyadh or Las Vegas were created, there is nothing merely sane about it. As for the Jews and their country it is a question I would say not a problem, but not more as for the Kurds or Gypsies. They are not predominantly antisocial or anti other religiuos groups, i have known a few, it’s all the same as with any other religions there are sane people and insane. The fact is that widespread banker usury gives them a competitive advantage for getting a country of their own much faster than some other nationalities engaged in war for independence. But that usury is a part of Jewish problem, (and for the past few hundred years also adopted Christian problem) which is found in the Old Testament equivalent to books of Torah. It is number one problem that caused persecution of Jews for centuries, not their noses and their hair as those mein kampf racists were mimicking. Banking industry as it is derived from the Bible should also research more from Bible and find out that there are other more providable solutions to problems than usury. For example the system of tens. It is sad that Jews are destroying the land that belongs to Palestinians on the wave of scavenging on Holocaust, but look at Kurds, what should they do, their country (or teritory) lies on the oil triangle

  26. stephanaugust  June 18, 2014 at 9:12 am

    There is a total Google blackout for this article. I searched several sentences as a string, and Google finds nothing.

    • Martin Maloney  June 18, 2014 at 9:04 pm

      @ stephanaugust

      “There is a total Google blackout for this article. I searched several sentences as a string, and Google finds nothing.”

      I live in the US. If you live outside the US, then your mikeage might vary

      Google gave two returns — hebrewvisionnews/ and Enclosing the title in quotes gave two additional returns — and

      DuckDuckGo, at first gave no returns. When I enclosed the title in quotes, it gave only VT as a return.

      Yahoo also gave only VT as a return. Enclosing the title in quotes gave no additional returns.

      This would suggest that Google is blacklisiting VT as a site. To test this, I went back to another article, “Is Your Boss Pocketing Your State Income Taxes?” and fed the title to Google. It returned the link to VT, to many additional sites and to a YouTube video of the same name.

      In other words, who knows what criteria Google uses?

  27. stephanaugust  June 18, 2014 at 8:54 am

    As for the Jewish emancipation, Benjamin H. Freedman wrote —

    — “In view of the Emancipation Edict in Germany in 1822, Germans regarded the London Agreement as a double-cross by Talmudists in Germany. Quota systems then existed in all other countries in Europe. There was no quota system in Germany after the Emancipation Edict of 1822 for Talmudists.”

    Are the history books of today censored so much that I can not find the Emancipation Edict of 1822?

    • etominusipi  June 18, 2014 at 11:27 am

      Stephen, i think Benjamin Freedman sometimes has minor errors. there may be confusion between 1822 and 1812. i think it was in 1812 that the Prussian Edict of Emancipation was codified. (NB, however, i am not knowledgeable in these matters). if you have spent time searching you may find this article useful, or at least sympathetic

      http //

    • etominusipi  June 18, 2014 at 11:37 am

      as per previous comment, the 1812 text (in Gothic Fraktur) can be viewed on googlebooks at

      http //

    • stephanaugust  June 18, 2014 at 12:13 pm

      Wow. If a researcher has problems finding a document the powers seem to hide something. I think I have to type the edict from Fraktur to modern searchable text and blog-post it.

      Thank you for the googlebooks link.

  28. ptwang  June 18, 2014 at 8:40 am

    No need to apologise for a Hitler quote, when your audience knows the truth about the world wars..

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network