Is ISIL really Sunni?



 By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor, for Press TV


eeee-1The Western media describes ISIL – the ultra-extremist terrorists destabilizing Iraq and Syria – as “Sunni militants.”

Headlines read: “Sunni Islamist Militants Seize Mosul.” “Sunni militants capture northern Iraqi town.” “Iraq Army Tries to Roll Back Sunni Militants’ Advance.”

The corporate media casts the fighting in Iraq as a Sunni vs. Shia conflict. The Sunni side, according to these reports, is led by ISIL – a group that was expelled from al-Qaeda for being too extreme.

But is ISIL really Sunni?

Many experts say “no.” Some question whether ISIL has a right to call itself an Islamic group at all.

In an interview with Truth Jihad Radio, Islamic scholar Dr. John Andrew Morrow (Ilyas Abd al-‘Alim Islam) questioned ISIL’s Islamic credentials: “A lot of so-called jihad (such as ISIL’s) is not rooted in Islam. Especially if you look at who’s funding it, who’s supporting it, who’s behind it. Western powers have a long history of using jihadists and Islamists to further their own imperial ambitions. In terms of the foot-soldiers, they may think they are fighting for Islam. But if you look closer, you find they’re furthering the cause of the enemy.”

Dr. Morrow pointed out that much of ISIL’s behavior is patently un-Islamic. He said that the ISIL terrorists love to film themselves committing war crimes that are forbidden by Islam: “They are very proud to commit atrocities. They film it. They upload it to the internet. They have their own websites.”

Dr. Morrow commented on the notorious video showing a Takfiri terrorist eating a dead soldier’s liver: “This is what Hind (an enemy of the Muslims) did. You’re not following the sahaba, you’re not following the Prophet. You’re following the polytheists who were fighting the Prophet when you start cannibalizing corpses. And there was another video of a poor Muslim sister who was strangled to death. I mean, who goes around strangling women to cries of Allahu akbar?”

Continuing the habit of vaunting their un-Islamic atrocities, ISIL terrorists recently posted internet videos showing themselves murdering 1,700 captured Iraqi army soldiers. They have also reportedly killed dozens of Sunni imams who refuse to swear allegiance to ISIL. And they are killing Shia Muslims indiscriminately.

If these terrorists are Sunni Muslims, why are they systematically violating the tenets of Sunni Islam?

In fact, ISIL appears to be far outside of Sunni Islam. The kind of “Islam” espoused by the ISIL Takfiris is an extreme version of the Salafi-Wahhabi school of thought. These people reject the five major Islamic madhhabs (schools of thought) including the four Sunni ones. If you reject all four Sunni madhhabs, how can you call yourself Sunni?

In fact, the extreme Salafi-Wahhabis, including the ultra-extreme ISIL, have broken with mainstream Islam as it has existed for fourteen centuries. By jettisoning the established Islamic madhhabs, and stepping outside of Islam as it has always been understood, they have entered a very dangerous territory in which they feel they can just make up the rules as they go along. So they make up such rules as: “It is okay to rape Christian and Shia women. It is okay to eat the internal organs of dead enemies. It is okay to marry ‘jihad brides’ for sex and divorce them after 30 minutes. It is okay to crucify Christian holy men. It is okay to strangle women to death. It is okay to mass-murder civilians. It is okay to mass-execute prisoners of war.”

No Sunni in history would recognize this as Sunni Islam.

Zaid Hamid, a Sunni Muslim defense analyst from Pakistan, says ISIS and related terrorist groups are not Sunnis, but Kharajite heretics serving an imperial anti-Islamic agenda. (The Kharajites were an ultra-radical group that rejected early versions of both Sunni and Shia Islam and stepped outside of the Islamic community – hence their name, which means “those who step outside.”) Hamid argues that the ultra-radical groups destabilizing Pakistan, Syria and Iraq have indeed stepped outside of Islam, and are making war on Islam and Muslims on behalf of Zionism and imperialism.

But isn’t it true that many Sunni Muslims in Iraq support ISIL?

Yes and no. It is true that some ordinary Iraqis from Sunni backgrounds have joined ISIL’s insurrection in Iraq. But these are mainly pro-Saddam revanchists, not religiously-oriented Sunni Muslims. Saddam Hussein, of course, was a radical secularist whose idols were Stalin and Hitler. Saddam’s Ba’ath party was anti-religious and pro-secularist; Saddam’s hatred of the Islamic Awakening was so extreme that he launched a war on the Ayatollah Khomeini’s new Islamic Republic in hopes of preventing the rebirth of Islam. So to call the Saddam Hussein supporters who are joining with ISIL “Sunnis” is misleading. Saddam’s forces, like ISIL, are opposed to Islam in both its traditional Sunni and Shia forms.

The full name of Sunnism is “the people of the Tradition of the Prophet and the consensus of the community” (ahl as-sunnah wa l-jamaʻah). Eating the livers of dead enemies is not part of the Tradition of the Prophet – it is the tradition of the enemies of the Prophet. And such behavior is obviously not approved by the consensus of the Muslim community.

The Tradition of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is one of inclusion, tolerance, mutual respect, and the forging of alliances between people of different tribes and religions. The original Muslim community, whose founding document is the Constitution of Medina, consisted of Christians, Jews and Muslims living together and sharing power and obligations on an equitable basis.

The real Sunna (Tradition) holds to reason and persuasion, and uses violence only as a last resort. The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and his Family and Companions preached peacefully for 12 years, despite atrocious persecution, before God finally authorized them to fight back in self-defense.

The real Tradition of the Prophet respects knowledge so much that “the ink of the scholar is more precious than the blood of the martyr.” And the consensus of the Islamic community is that the work of 14 centuries worth of Islamic scholarship – the five major Islamic madhhabs, both the four Sunni madhhabs and the Shia Ja’fari madhhab – collectively represents mainstream Islam. All Sunni Muslims have tremendous respect for Imam Ja’far al-Sadiq, who founded the main Shia madhhab. The terrorists who reject this tremendous scholarly achievement, and want to kill everyone who disagrees with them, are far outside of normative Sunni Islam.

So why does the Western mainstream media insist on calling anti-Sunni, anti-Shia groups like ISIL “Sunni”?

Perhaps the problem is laziness. Since ISIL has a special hatred for Shia Muslims, the simplest way to portray them is to paint the situation as an alleged Sunni vs. Shia conflict. By defaulting to this lowest-common-denominator description, the media absolves itself from the duty of explaining, in detail, what is actually going on.

But it is also possible that the corporate media is intentionally misreporting the situation. The extreme-Zionist neoconservatives launched the US invasion of Iraq in order to break up that country, and the Middle East as a whole, by inciting ethnic and sectarian strife. The “Sunni vs. Shia” meme was created and spread by the Occupiers through a wave of false-flag terrorism. Perhaps the media is trumpeting that meme in order to propagate it.

In any case, the world’s Sunni Muslims are being slandered every time the media calls ISIL “Sunni.” It is time for Sunnis to reject this mischaracterization of their religion. Perhaps Sunni Muslims should file a class action lawsuit against the media outlets that are spreading this calumny.


  1. Correction I think this is not quite true about ISIS financed by Saudi Arabia
    it is run by Saudi Arabia and is under direct personal control of Dick Cheney.


  2. Activist post has an interesting article on ISIL by Brandon Turbeville. He quotes an interview of a captured ISIL fighter in Syria who said that orders came from Abu Faisal, Sordid royal prince. He points out that purported ISIL head al-Baghdadi may be fiction.
    And do see Jonas Alexis’ article here on VT about their being trained in Jordan.

  3. I always thought they were paid mercenaries with Mossad and CIA trainers. Who always benefits from there actions. They act like zionists or talmud jews. Everything they do is a scripted show for propaganda agenda. No self respecting Muslim would do such things.

    • Geo-politics and its tools have one Purpose – To secure the perpetuation of the Drug Trade.

      Or if you prefer you can also say – “The prime Geo-Politic is the Drug Trade.”

      Both these statements would be true.


  4. Dr. Barrett, I sincerely appreciate your clarifications here.This is a very dark time for intense divisiveness amongst Muslims that seems, as you so well pointed out, to be a tragic & compelling “set-up” by outside forces as well as those who grossly misrepresent true Islam. Your information here is helpful to those of us who do not always have access to the truth. May Allah bless all sincere Muslims who are suffering throughout the Middle East…

  5. Come on, every well-informed man (and woman) and his/her well-informed dog know that ISIS is backed by Sordid Arabia, the Muslim Brother Erdogan, and the constellation of Zionist helpers — and the whole horrorshow is directed from Amerika. And Amerika is directed from Tel Aviv!

  6. Come on, this Zaid Hamid must have gotten it completelly backwards

    A tree is known by its fruits.

    If ‘..ISIS and related terrorist groups are not Sunnis but Kharajite
    heretics’ then how come Oman, a country where the majority are Ibadhis,
    a group that stems from Kharijites, happens to be the most peaceful nation
    with Zero sectarian tensions in the Middle East and including Pakistan ?

    Sunni’s, Shia, Christians, Hindus and what have you all co-exist in
    brotherly and respectful peaceful way, unlike in many Sunni, Shia
    or Christian societies.

    “The Ibadis, a group who stemmed from the same mother group as the Kharijites,
    have survived into the present day, though they do not directly descend from
    the Kharijites. They form a significant part of the population of Oman
    (where they first settled in 686),[7] and there are smaller concentrations
    of them in the M’zab of Algeria, Jerba in Tunisia, Jebel Nafusa in Libya,
    and Zanzibar.”
    http //

  7. why is that articles follow comments section and with less credibility? sorry, but i am glad i jump to comments sections first prior to teading article. i already knew isis is not sunny and comments sections reinforced my views… but vt was parrotiing isis as sunni militants just like msms and when it coundlt do it anymore and changed tactics. winder how much of vt is aligned to msm -/

    • Adil
      VT is not absolute and they use information they can get at their best. They do make mistakes but these mistakes are honest ones. More information gets out more correct VT articles will be. This is how it is.

  8. “…ISIL – a group that was expelled from al-Qaeda for being too extreme.”

    I thought al Qaeda took their orders from Langley, Virginia?

    • Well, this latest crop of bad asses Worker Bee, is financed by Saudi Arabia
      King Duff was on Mike Harris’ show yesterday (6/19) at Revolution Radio,
      and that is what he told us. That show is a must listen to, not archived yet,
      Revolution Radio probably does that today, but here is the link to the archives

      https //


Comments are closed.