NEO – Argentine Debt Default is Risky US Power Poker

 

argentina-debt-default-grafitti

Argentine Debt Default is Risky US Power Poker

…  by  F. William Engdahl,       … with  New Eastern Outlook, Moscow

 

Cristina Fernandez "womans" the ramparts against the vulture funds

Cristina Fernandez “womans” the ramparts against the vulture funds

[ Editor’s note:  This is a classic “You just can’t make this stuff up” story.  It appears that vulture funds can demand full payment and interest on old bond debt by holding everyone else up who has settled, by country shopping for the right judicial district to file their case.

The result is total chaos in international relations where “settled” debt default resolutions can be “unsettled” by a talented white collar hustler. If there were felony provision for practicing financial terrorism, and there should be, this would certainly qualify.

Despite this having gone on for years I have seen no movement toward an international treaty of some sort that would put the demon back into the bottle. Suspicious me, I smell a dark hand in the background who wants to keep this vulture fund torment in play…but who and why?

Debt resettlement has been part of the international financial system for a long time. Even the US has had Treasury officials drop the bomb when pressed how we could ever pay our huge debt off, by giving up the ghost that “we can just kill the dollar”, to pay of the debt for pennies on the dollar…ahhh, a substantial resettlement.

With the world’s attention on so many crises being juggled at the same time, dealing with this one seems to have slipped through the cracks, maybe even some greased cracks. Countries have always stepped in to limit financial speculation when the economic health of the country was threatened by it, so no reinventing the wheel is needed here. The State’s power to protect itself exists. We even have drones for situations like this now.

It brings in to question the ability of current world leaders, when cheap hustlers like this cannot be dealt with effectively, but the US can support the regime change in Syrian where 180,000 have died so far while calling itself the protector of freedom in the world. No, you really can’t make this stuff up… Jim W. Dean ]

________________________________

First published  …  August 29, 2014

 

Pesos and dollars

Pesos and dollars

Most are unaware of the drama unfolding behind the imminent threat of (yet another) Argentina debt default. Far from another tale of a corrupt developing country not able to meet its foreign debt obligations, as the world saw during the 1980’s and late 1990’s, the real drama behind Argentina’s sovereign debt default is a risky, in fact, dangerous power play by Washington and Wall Street.

It is  aimed at terrorizing, not just Argentina but, all emerging nations into playing by rules uniquely written on Wall Street to the unique benefit of Wall Street banks and hedge funds.

On August 1, the Wall Street credit rating agency, Standard & Poors, the same agency accused of politically intervening to turn the Greek debt crisis into a Euro crisis in 2011, acted to declare Argentina in “Selective Default.”

The declaration came when negotiations between the Argentine Government and Wall Street hedge funds failed to resolve a dispute over payment of €400 million in debt. But this is more interesting that it appears. It was Argentina which refused to agree to pay the amount, not the funds who refused.

Background

The critical bit of intelligence is that the dispute is not about Argentina being able to service its foreign debts, as was the case in more than a decade ago. In 2001, Argentina defaulted on almost US$ 82 billion of its sovereign debt.

It was a bitter time for the country, as Wall Street and City of London banks had pushed the government against the wall. Its government negotiated debt restructuring terms in 2005 and 2010, with around 92% of the holders of defaulted debt accepting “haircuts” or significant reduction on the value of their bonds.

Then, about 8% of bondholders did not accept the terms of the restructuring, so-called “holdouts” which were mostly speculative hedge funds. The hedge funds, led by NML Capital, part of Paul Singer’s Elliott Capital Management, refused the terms of the haircut offered by Argentina. They demanded repayment in full of the bonds by Argentina, plus interest.

__________________________

Vulture capitalism rules

 

Should vulture funds be treated as financial terrorists, and the judges that support them?

Should vulture funds be treated as financial terrorists, and the judges that support them?

There is an ugly little wrinkle however. Singer’s NML Capital is not even an ordinary hedge fund. He runs what is called a “vulture fund,” a special kind of speculation fund.

As the name implies, like a vulture, it scavenges debt “corpses” for potential profits as high as 1700% on investment. It is the most cynical expression of the pure free market logic of Gordon Gekko from Oliver Stone’s 1987 film Wall Street.

They buy the debt of poor countries or countries in financial recovery for pennies on the dollar and then sue in known courts, often recovering up to ten times the purchase price, usually by suing in “market friendly” US or European courts.

Vulture funds are very secretive and are often based in offshore tax havens like the Cayman Islands. Singer’s potential profits come by his suing in a US District Court and winning.

Thus, the issue between Argentina and Singer is whether its voluntary agreement with the other 92% debt holders, which Argentina has paid into an escrow account that the US Court judge froze pending resolution of Singer’s demands, can be sabotaged by a crass speculator gambling on friendly judges to give him obscene profit at the expense of the stability of an entire nation.

The freedom of unregulated vulture funds buying up defaulted sovereign debt and suing for recovery would be as if, in 1991 at the dissolution of the Soviet state, Wall Street hedge funds sued the Russian Federation to recover in full – plus accrued interest – defaulted 1916 Czarist Russia bonds that it had bought in a rummage sale for pennies. The point is not the madness of the vulture funds, but the madness of the US Federal District Court in New York, and even the Supreme Court in allowing such madness exist.

Judge Griesa

Federal District Court Judge Thomas Griesa

This past June, the US Supreme Court, one of the most bizarre courts in US history, ruled in favor of the NML Capital Vulture Fund, holding that it would not review Argentina’s appeal of the Federal District Court Judge Thomas Griesa.

Leaving aside the fact that Judge Griesa is 84 years old and his rulings suggest possible senility, the situation is more than bizarre, so much so that even the Obama Government and the IMF oppose the Judge’s ruling.

Judge Griesa has issued contradictory rulings in the Argentine case, yet the Supreme Court refuses to examine the case. Griesa, using a legal argument of parity or para passu, blocked Argentina from making any payments to the 92%, the holders of its restructured debt, if it does not make payments to the holdouts suing the country. As he stated, his rulings all were intended to force Argentina to live up to what he repeatedly called its “obligations.”

Griesa ruled that Argentina must pay the old bonds in full at the same time it made the next semiannual interest payment to holders of the new bonds. And if it did not do so, any bank that helped Argentina pay interest on the new bonds would be violating the order. That ruling was upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and in June, the Supreme Court refused to hear Argentina’s final appeal.

Judge Griesa is in effect seeking to control actions by a sovereign government and issuing orders that are supposed to be binding on those who would ordinarily never be within the jurisdiction of an American court. It’s a bit mad were it not for the fact that the US Supreme Court, whose knowledge of vulture funds and complex financial deals is perhaps limited, refused to challenge the determined Griesa.

Argentinian president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner with Obama

Argentinian president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner with Obama

Argentine President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner called the court orders “extortion.” But she said her country will continue making payments to holders of its restructured debt. The payments however have been frozen by US Judge Griesa.

For Argentina, it is a nuclear “Catch 22.” If she pays the $1.33 billion to the vulture fund as the judge demands, the other hedge fund “holdouts will in part or all sue as well to demand full 100% repayment.

Argentina estimates that would cost as much as $28 billion, exhausting the country’s foreign exchange reserves. But, by blocking the payment to the 92%, Judge Griesa is forcing an unwilling default by Argentina.

The savagery of Singer’s vulture fund knows no bounds. In October 2013, in an attempt to collect its Argentine debt, NML Capital asked a Ghanaian court to seize one of Argentina’s ships, the ADA Libertad, parked off the coast of Ghana. NML Capital won the case and Ghana seized the ship. Later, the ruling was overturned by the United Nations Tribunal on the Laws of the Sea and the ship was returned to Argentina.

On June 21, 2013, Ghana’s Supreme Court condemned the Argentine ship seizure. But it indicates the Barbary Pirate nature of these vulture funds, funds which are not recognized in many countries, including Germany.

Joe Stiglitz, Nobel Prize economist, noted of the Argentina US court rulings, “We’ve had a lot of bombs being thrown around the world, and this is America throwing a bomb into the global economic system. We don’t know how big the explosion will be — and it’s not just about Argentina.”

________________


YouTube - Veterans Today -

________________

F. William Engdahl, a strategic risk consultant and lecturer, holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

 

Editing:  Jim W. Dean  and  Erica P. Wissinger

640x260_NEO_Moscow5

________________________________

Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:



All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Some content may be satirical in nature. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within are full responsibility of author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on September 9, 2014, With 1776 Reads Filed under Economy & Business. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

11 Responses to "NEO – Argentine Debt Default is Risky US Power Poker"

  1. Simpsons Donkey  September 13, 2014 at 6:02 am

    It’s simple. Singer and Griesa should be killed.

    • moneytalks  September 13, 2014 at 4:18 pm

      Affairs are heading in that direction .

  2. Bartered  September 10, 2014 at 11:11 pm

    “It is aimed at terrorizing, not just Argentina but, all emerging nations into playing by rules uniquely written on Wall Street to the unique benefit of Wall Street banks and hedge funds.”

    Well the same usury got Lincoln assaniated days after the Civil war. He told the British banks that loaned the North all the money, (Morgan House) for their war to shove it, and they did. It seems the only way to get out of that debt is to take the bankers to court for predatory lending, or declare bankruptcy in a manner that the debtors are unable to take anything, but how many countries have ever even tried?

    • wiggins  September 12, 2014 at 11:58 am

      Absolutely…..this is ‘terrorism’ on any Country who would have the temerity to join the BRICS……..are the Rothshite ‘Empire”..bricking it? Let us hope so…

  3. Proudly_CattleGoy  September 10, 2014 at 4:46 am

    The zios have used every trick in the book to burden the region and make sure that Latinoamérica remains divided, oppressed and looted economic hitmen, bribery, blackmail, assassination (latest Chavez & Kirchner), odious-debt contracts, zioinfil-traitors (the richest “Argentinians” are all zios!!!), masonic lapdogs running the Provinces, total control of the mass media, bio-weapons disguised as food (GMOs), territory theft (before Malvinas. Now Patagonia theft through the Andinia Plan and theft of Antarctic territories by declaring them as “British” lands), and so on and so on.
    Virtually all the external debts were signed under diverse forms of pressure and criminal behaviors & undue procedures, so why do we have to pay for something illegally signed? Besides, those resources will go to feed the beast that is also choking the rest of the world, including the general population of the United Stasi (GMOs, depleted uranium, aspartame, debt, presstitute, rigged s-elections, masonic & satanic infestation, ziocontrol, phony drug war, perpetual invasions, phony dollars, etc.)

    • moneytalks  September 13, 2014 at 4:35 pm

      “” so why do we have to pay for something illegally signed? “”

      How do you prove it was illegal ? They built the courts with swindled money . They financed the politicians who appointed the judges or financed their own campaigns for appointment to the courts with swindled money . They pay-off politicians to push buttons for the judges with swindled money . They pay-off lawyers to throw cases in their favor with swindled money . All the while , the clueless sheeple masses [ hear no evil , see no evil , speak no evil ] so that they can be { saved } from the swindlers . The sheeple are brilliant , yes ?

  4. Proudly_CattleGoy  September 10, 2014 at 4:40 am

    My country Latinoamérica has been a prime target by the zios for the last 350 years, specially the Hispanic region. First, it was dismembered into weaker territories by the errand boys of the zios the masonic traitors, which were here presented as “independence” fighters. Later, their masonic counterparts in office in North America complemented the attack by stealing huge portions of territory. Argentina still remains as one of the most important regions of our country, so it’s perfectly understandable that the zios maintain an iron grip on the territory.
    Before Chavez, the last nationalistic President was Peron, who knew perfectly the face of the enemy that’s why he supported the Nazi guys (when the fact that Hitler was a Rothschild was unknown to the general public) and that’s why the territory had no external debt, so Argentina was the 8th top economy (later, the zios desecrated Peron’s tomb, confirming who’s behind the Argentinian debacle). Sadly, the zios had already consolidated their power base into the modern axis of evil New York, London & Tel Aviv, so they organized a coup, and decided to choke the economy with crippling debt.

    • wiggins  September 12, 2014 at 12:04 pm

      Yep ..RAF and the Protocols are a forgery…..sure they are. But, not quite true …because the appeal held up that it was a corrupt trial ……in Switzerland of all places, dear dog, is nothing sacred?

  5. cynthiamaccioli  September 9, 2014 at 4:32 pm

    I was in Argentina 4 years after the last crash they had in 2002. My God, how these people struggled just to keep their homes. There was not one single sight of affluence, women even sold their wedding bands, not one piece of jewelry, no nice duds, ubiquitous child begging, 1 lb filet mignon dinners for 5 bucks, in one of the most beautiful cities I ever set sight upon. At the turn of the century Argentina was the 3rd largest economy in the world.
    No wonder why they’re picking on Argentina. Could it be the Zionists are pissed at the Argentine intelligen cia verifying that the Jewish bombing a few years back actually came from the inside of the building, totally debunking the anti-semitism canard Jewland has accused them of? I think, maybe, yes.

  6. Grampah  September 9, 2014 at 11:09 am

    “argentina should look to join brics” and quickly.

    • Charlotte NC Bill  September 9, 2014 at 7:42 pm

      They need to-and fast. Venezuela, Peru should too…Iran, Pakistan, Japan(?)….anyone being dragged behind the limo of the IMF/Wall St. Anglo-American-Talmudia NWO as it chugs along needs to wake up..

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network