The Strange Case of Michael Shrimpton

UK Daily Mail "Hit Piece" Ads to Shrimpton Credibility

Michael Shrimpton

Michael Shrimpton

…by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor


Editor’s note:  In reviewing Able Danger documentation, the following information was ascertained from the investigation notes:

All the original Able Danger investigators were hand picked by President George H.W. Bush.  In 1998, key investigators were removed by the Clinton administration in what was termed a “cover up.”  After 9/11, former President George H.W. Bush hired CIA operative Roland Carnaby to put together a team to continue Able Danger.  Records we have reviewed reveal that Bush (41) was the driving force behind the investigation of nuclear weapon theft, quite possibly the real source of the alleged nuclear devices referred to by Shrimpton and partially confirmed by Able Danger/FBI/IAEA sources.  The team worked out of the former president’s offices in Houston.  Carnaby, protégé of Bush (41) and James Baker III, was murdered in 2008 in a professional “hit.” (highest level sources)



The trial of Michael Shrimpton began today in the United Kingdom.  Shrimpton is charged with two counts of making “hoax” bomb threats.  In actuality, Shrimpton is a scapegoat tied to very real scandals, including nuclear blackmail, or so we are told by proven sources at the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) and US Department of Energy, America’s nuclear weapons design agency.

When seen in the light of today’s reality, the continual deceptions to support the Kiev junta and their war crimes or Turkish and Israeli complicity on behalf of ISIS, Shrimpton’s claims become almost mainstream.  Do remember, America still claims the Taliban ships 500 tons of heroin around the world using aircraft that could only operate from American air facilities.  Does the Taliban have an air force?  And some say Shrimpton is crazy?

Evidence has come to light that substantial portions of Shrimpton’s claims may well be true but that witnesses, some part of the survivors of the ill fated Able Danger investigation in the US, have knowledge that supports Shrimpton.  On 9/11, 35 Able Danger investigators died while awaiting a Pentagon briefing that was running late.  Others, as Able Danger was mult-jurisdictional, are under gag orders after testifying before a secret Houston grand jury empowered to investigate national security threats both prior and subsequent to the 9/11 attacks.

In addition, former Vice President Dick Cheney has repeatedly warned Americans that not only is nuclear terrorism against America a possibility, he considers it inevitable.  Is the basis of these statements, that deeply parallel the “hoaxes” Shrimpton stands accused of, a possible confirmation that Shrimpton’s warning has led to criminal charges not because they were false but rather because they were true?

In June, 2014, I was contacted by someone identifying himself as a former IAEA investigator.  I was sent a copy of his passport, showing travel to the places his story told of, a story of stolen nuclear weapons, Victor Bout, a destroyed nuclear reactor at Dimona and the sale and use of nuclear weapons.  The story included complicity at the top of the Department of Energy, involvement of heads of state, South Africa, Israel, along with several American’s who rose to prominence after 9/11.

His diplomatic passport included signature authorizations from the Secretary General of the United Nations.

161Passport from authoritative source silenced, unable to back Shrimpton

The story also includes gag orders against any capable of backing Shrimpton and a very real threat of prosecution in Britain if anyone were to come forward.  You see, any testimony backing Shrimpton would be considered “obstruction” as we saw in the illegal extradition and attempted prosecution of John Anthony Hill, producer of the film “Ripple Effect,” accusing the British government and Israel of planning the 7/7 attacks.  Hill’s film was so compelling that jury members felt they had the wrong defendant on trial.

Below is an interview with Hill after his release.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

As proof, I was sent a narrative and pages of plans for nuclear weapons of unusual design, energy weapons yet unimagined, plans, designs, formulas, details submitted to scientists and engineers who, to a one, said they were not only genuine, but asked how I could have these and still be alive.

Part of the narrative involved the tale, at least part of it, that Michael Shrimpton is facing prison over.  My source, vetted and proven, says there was a bomb, that it was smuggled by submarine from Germany and that it was used to blackmail Britain.

I was also told that the relationship between the United States and Britain was significantly damaged by this incident and that American NEST (Nuclear Emergency Support Teams) teams from the US secured the weapon from the vicinity of the Olympic stadium.

The rest of the story involves high powered law firms, secret grand jury testimony, dead witnesses, attempts to discredit FBI agents and a Washington DC espionage ring supported by blackmail, human trafficking and worse.  It is all there and has been for a decade or more.  This is only a small percentage of it.  Key portions are published with “proofs” in the form of advanced formulas and designs.

Speaking out in Britain is unusual.  Here, also from the Daily Mail, is an excerpt from an opinion piece submitted by former SAS commander, General Sir Michael Rose.  Michael and I discussed our coinciding views during an “outing” that included top British military and intelligence figures.

“Blair today swans about the world making millions from business contracts and lectures. And, to make matters still more distasteful, much of these earnings are only made possible because of the American and Middle Eastern contacts he made as a result of his unconditional support for Bush during the Iraq war.

In going to war, against the will of the people, Blair has gravely damaged democracy in this country. Is it any surprise that only a minority of the voting public in Britain now turn out for general elections?

That is why I believe that, if justice is to prevail, and faith in democracy is to be restored in this country, Tony Blair and those officials responsible for the disasters of the Iraq war should appear in a court of law which could lead to them being indicted for war crimes.

We owe this much at least to those many brave and courageous people who have died or been injured in Iraq as well as to their families.

As with the shooting of Admiral Byng, putting Blair before a court of law to answer for his actions would surely encourage future prime ministers not to wage costly and unnecessary wars in times to come.”

Few in Britain have the personal gravity to make such statements, not even General Rose, with a series of knighthoods and other honours.

Below, we see the kind of journalism the Daily Mail is capable of when, as it seems, it is directed by others.

 See Daily Mail “Hit Piece” Below:


Barrister made bomb hoax calls to Defence Secretary claiming London 2012 and the Queen were targets, court hears

  • Michael Shrimpton, 57, denies making two bomb hoaxes about the Olympics
  • Southwark Crown Court heard he telephoned MP Philip Hammond 
  • He claimed bomb from a Russian submarine had been smuggled into Britain
  • Shrimpton said he had  ‘credible’ information it could be used to blow up the opening ceremony of the 2012 Olympics and kill the Queen, the court heard

By Amanda Williams for MailOnline

A barrister made a hoax call to the former Defence Secretary claiming to have intelligence about terrorist bomb attacks on the London Olympics and the assassination of the Queen, a court heard.

Michael Shrimpton, 57, telephoned MP Philip Hammond to tell him that a bomb stolen from a sunken Russian submarine had been smuggled into the country and could be used to blow up the opening ceremony of the London Olympics and kill the Queen, a jury was told.

Southwark Crown Court heard how Shrimpton had said he had picked up information from ‘credible European sources’ that intelligence was being blocked by official channels about the terror threat and left a message for Mr Hammond, in which he dropped the names of several MPs.


Barrister Michael Shrimpton is accused of making a hoax call to the former Defence Secretary claiming to have intelligence about terrorist bomb attacks on the London Olympics and the assassination of the Queen

He told police who arrested him the following day that hauling him in for questioning was ‘a colossal c**k-up worthy of an apology, damages and lunch on the MI5.’

Shrimpton, of Wendover, Buckinghamshire, who is representing himself, denies two counts of making bomb hoaxes relating to the London 2012 Games.

Opening the case prosecutor Alan Blake said: ‘This is a 57-year-old barrister with a fascination for politics the military and intelligence.

‘In April 2012, he passed on information about a threat of nuclear attack. That information was extraordinary and dramatic.’


Shrimpton called Mr Hammond’s office on April 19, 2012, and left a message warning that the nuclear weapon had been stolen from the sunken Russian submarine, the Kursk.

He said it had been smuggled into the UK and stored near a London hospital in preparation for the attack.

Mr Blake said: ‘You will remember the degree of tension about potential terrorists and it would have been brave and foolish to ignore threats, especially from a professional man.’

The court heard that Shrimpton, a self proclaimed intelligence expert on national security, also telephoned Sarah Sproat, of the Conservation Association in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, the following day and told her about the bomb threats.

Barry Burton, who was Parliamentary Private Secretary to the Defence Secretary at the time, told the court he spoke to Shrimpton on the telephone on April 19, 2012.


Shrimpton, 57, telephoned MP Philip Hammond to tell him that a bomb stolen from a sunken Russian submarine had been smuggled into the country, Southwark Crown Court was told

‘He said he had concerns about threats to the London Games and to the Queen,’ said Mr Burton.

‘He said a mass nuclear weapon had entered the UK. He said four other weapons were removed from the submarine Kursk when it sank and he explained one had been obtained by the German terrorist organisation DVD.

‘He said one of the weapons caused the tsunami disaster in Japan.’

Mr Burton said Shrimpton spoke in a calm manner and told him he knew William Hague and former Defence Secretary, Liam Fox, but Mr Burton said he had not heard Mr Fox mention Shrimpton.

He told the court: ‘He said he was a lawyer with an involvement in national security and he was a Conservative.’

Mr Burton believed he was a hoax caller but told the Olympic Security Authority and the cabinet office.

Under cross-examination, Shrimpton told Mr Burton, who has worked for the Ministry of Defence for 36 years, that he had said there was a possibility a nuclear warhead had been smuggled into London.

Mr Burton replied: ‘What I heard from the caller was that a weapon had been moved to the UK.’

Shrimpton asked Mr Burton if an E3 plane is capable of carrying detectors which can pick up nuclear warheads but Mr Burton replied: ‘I don’t know.’

Shrimpton said: ‘Someone at the Cabinet Office grounded the E3’s’.’

Mr Burton replied: I don’t know.’

When Shrimpton asked Mr Burton if he accepted that a number of nuclear weapons had gone missing over recent years, Mr Burton replied: ‘I have no knowledge of that’ – prompting Judge McCreath to sharply reprimand him.

The judge said: ‘I have no idea where this is going. You have been a barrister for a number of years and you cannot use witnesses as part of your speeches. They are here to answer questions.

‘I will not have conspiracy theories bandied around the court unless they are genuinely real.

Shrimpton said he had picked up information from ‘credible European sources’ that intelligence was being blocked by official channels about the terror threat and left a message for Mr Hammond, it is claimed

‘You must control yourself.

‘The guillotine is very close to your neck.’

Shrimpton was arrested on April 20, 2012 and told police he was an intelligence and national security specialist with hundreds of contacts.

He said the German Defence Service, DVD, was responsible for sabotaging the Kursk and stated the service now controls Al Qaeda and has penetrated MI5 and MI6.

Shrimpton refused to reveal his sources but said they included ‘someone in Munch who lunches with the Pope.’

He called his arrest a colossal c**k-up worthy of an apology, damages and lunch on the MI5, and claimed the weapon had been taken back out of the UK while he had been in custody by the Royal Navy, which moved it to Germany, and it could be used against New York.

Mr Blake said: ‘Mr Shrimpton communicated the threat using vocabulary and the persona of an intelligence insider at a time of national heightened tension. Despite his protestations, he knew or believed the information had no real foundations and was false and misleading.

‘Michael Shrimpton is an unrelenting networker desperate to associate himself with people with real power and influence.

‘His persona as an intelligence specialist is founded on flimsy foundations. He sought to above all bolster his credibility.’

Shrimpton, of Wendover, Buckinghamshire, denies two counts of making bomb hoaxes relating to the London 2012 Games.

The trial continues.

Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:

All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within this post are the full responsibility of the author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on November 10, 2014, With 10631 Reads Filed under WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

88 Responses to "The Strange Case of Michael Shrimpton"

  1. Forerunner  November 25, 2014 at 9:10 am

    o-oh…. ( http //

    • Forerunner  November 25, 2014 at 9:18 am

      another just in… http //

  2. jake gittes  November 17, 2014 at 7:12 am

    Fulford’s latest

    “On a final note, this writer was offered first class tickets to go to the UK and testify in the Michael Shrimpton trial about nuclear terror threats to the 2012 London Olympics. However, I was warned in a phone call from London that the trial might be trap set by Tony Blair and other Bush minions in the UK.”

  3. JS  November 16, 2014 at 6:48 am

    Mr Shrimpton has another defense, which I assume he will use. He had NO choice but to report what he heard. Failure to report a treason plot (this had to involve treason) is itself a crime in the UK, punishable by life in prison, and possibly asset forfeiture. It’s called Misprision of Treason. As an officer of the court, there are probably additional crimes for failure to report. But the crime he is charged with, bomb hoax, gets you ‘only’ 7 years jail, much better than life.

    • JS  November 16, 2014 at 7:18 am

      Also, officials who refuse to prosecute treason, are themselves guilty of Compounding Treason. “Compounding treason is an offence under the common law of England. It is committed by anyone who agrees for consideration to abstain from prosecuting the offender who has committed treason.” I assure you, there is ALWAYS a consideration involved.

    • Excalibur  November 16, 2014 at 5:01 pm

      JS is absolutely right. Failure to report Treason or an attempt at Treason (which the attempted assassination of the Monarch would always be) is itself an offence Misprision of Treason. The English Constitution Group (headed by a retired police officer) has been trying to report Blair and others to the authorities for High Treason for some years – facing problems getting the legal system and senior police officers to take notice of its OWN ancient laws. The judaic cabal simply IGNORES laws that it does not like of course.

  4. jake gittes  November 15, 2014 at 6:18 am

    What’s going on in this trial? One article dated Nov. 12, a few others Nov. 10 and 11.. nothing since. All Daily Mail, Bucks Herald, Mirror, Telegraph, etc. Anyone from VT going to cover it?

    • Robbie the Pict  November 15, 2014 at 3:43 pm

      Hi Jake/LS,
      This story may have been subjected to a DA-Notice, in other words blacked out by the Ministry of Defence. Technically it is a ‘volountary’ cease and desist after a phone call from the chairman of the DA-Notice Committee, but since he is the Permanent Under-Secretary to the Minister of Defence, a civil servant of great power and influence who watches Ministers come and go through the revolving door of party politics, his word is akin to that of G*D. An editor with stones could go ahead and publish but he is immediately shit-listed for future favour. Unfortunately this is not a guide to the merits of Shrimpers’ arguments or even content. It just means that they don’t like a shot-gun blast in all directions, with Her Majesty’s name in the mix, going off in a public Court of Law. Shrimpers’ defence was strengthened by the rumour of an attack on Mrs Battenburg at the cenotaph last Remembrance Day, which cause security to be stepped up. ‘Why was the fellow who came up with that warning not prosecuted M’Lud?! Or will he be joining me in the dock later?!’ VT needs a local asset on the tube to Southwark every day. Incidentally Shrimpers may also be able to answer some UFO questions. In a previous case a Judge once suggested that he was ‘from a different planet and speaking a different language’. That would have made Michael’s day!

    • jake gittes  November 15, 2014 at 6:05 pm

      Thanks, Robbie. Hopefully VT has someone there who will report on it as soon as the DA-Notice is lifted. I’m very curious what Shrimpy and Fulford are saying in there.

    • JS  November 16, 2014 at 6:23 am

      Robbie, I don’t suppose you could pop in on the trial for us? Just one day or half a day?

  5. LightSaber  November 14, 2014 at 3:16 pm

    Why the censorship…?

  6. Excalibur  November 13, 2014 at 10:15 am

    Odd as it might seem – I think that Shrimpton was right about the current batch of sex/paedophile accusations against high profile figures/minor celebrities in Britain following the Jimmy Saville exposures – being mainly bogus and brought largely as a DISTRACTION away from the real problem and the real perpetrators. The real problem could set Westminster in a terrible light if true.

    Hundreds of ‘files’ have apparently gone missing that are said to detail politicians historically involved in this. This information also dovetails in with information I recall seeing distributed by the British National Party many years ago. It was on the BNP website – that was subsequently destroyed and closed down by ‘someone’. There was also talk of ‘the security services’ filming some of the goings on! (Whose security services I don’t know). I remember seeing it – and thinking that there would be an outcry and hell to pay for this – but of course absolutely nothing happened and nothing was announced on the MSM about it whatsoever. The BNP pointed out that a defence Minister resigned suddenly and was given a fat cat salary job in the EU. Then nothing! I do not know where they got their information – but they have been right about a lot of other things as outraged civil servants used to pass them info.

  7. Gordon Duff  November 13, 2014 at 6:38 am

    That this was nuclear blackmail and not a real planned terror attack, allowing Britain to remain to total dupe nation, a corrupt handpuppet of xxxxxx should have been allowed.

    Cheney says what he says because he has been told there are 25 nuclear EMP weapons planted around the US. Is it true? I can say with certainty that it is very possible that some weapons are here and in place. I have so many confirmations on this that everyone in Washington must know. Cheney certainly says it often enough. Nobody listens to him. Why is that?

  8. Bravo  November 12, 2014 at 8:04 am

    Is it crass of me to believe that this could all have been a publicity stunt to promote his new book that subsequently went horribly wrong?

    If I suspend belief concerning the validity of the original intel, and only look at the means used to report the nuke then I can see how the threat of a looming public trial promoted by the Daily Mail amongst others is a far better promotional channel than a anonymous call to certain people.

    After all the DVD is now in the public eye in a limited fashion, along with Michael Shrimpton and his new book…notoriety does indeed shift books from shelves.

    • jake gittes  November 12, 2014 at 3:11 pm

      Publicity stunt or possibly a controlled opposition attempt to discredit VT?

      from one trial account — “Mr Blake told the jury that Shrimpton “is not being prosecuted for being a conspiracy theorist”, but added “There may be a temptation to dismiss the defendant as a harmless eccentric or even to some as mentally unbalanced.

      “The defendant will be the first to assure you that he is sane and, he would say, highly intelligent.”

      from another at — http //

      “Shrimpton refused to reveal his sources to police but said they included “someone in Munich who lunches with the Pope.”

      Judge Alistair McCreath warned Shrimpton about his behaviour while representing himself in court earlier in the case. “I will not have conspiracy theories bandied around the court,” he said, following Shrimpton’s assertions that nuclear warheads had previously ‘gone missing’ in the UK.”

    • Gordon Duff  November 13, 2014 at 6:34 am

      Then again, the source of the story about the missing nuclear warheads was Lady Manningham Buller, former head of MI 5 and Michael Blatchford, the owner of the company that builds the equipment to ship nuclear weapons. Blatchford says he witnessed it.
      Then again, this story began in 2005 with an article in the Guardian by Tim Shipman, claiming 3 nuclear weapons Thatcher had purchased from South Africa were missing. This is all a total fabrication, this is why Britain set up the Chilcott Commission to investigate it. When I publish a piece of a passport, that evidence, to a trained eye, is “slam dunk.” It proves I have the whole thing.

    • Gordon Duff  November 13, 2014 at 6:30 am

      I would hope he is not that crazy. I would say it is unlikely.

    • JS  November 13, 2014 at 3:15 pm

      Bravo, I think this trial IS a publicity stunt, but NOT one that was devised by Mr Shrimpton. I think it is elements of the UK gov’t that want this info to get out. Both Telegraph and Mirror discussed DVD! Ben Fulford’s new article has interesting info about the trial. The FULL article is below.

  9. jake gittes  November 12, 2014 at 7:49 am

    My guess would be Poppy was trying to steer the investigation in the wrong direction.

  10. Charles Anderson  November 11, 2014 at 9:47 pm


    MICHAEL SHRIMPTON is the Sorcha Faal of Veterans Today. His ridiculous columns which supported discredited theories and historical accounts were sprinkled with a little chickenfeed. And it was old, outdated chickenfeed at that.
    All who believe in the DVD tooth fairy are not to be trusted.
    SHRIMPTON may be like HAL TURNER. Turner was allowed to stay on the air with a ridiculous racist act that would embarass a Nazi, yet there was never any govt action nor media outcry toward him. Yet he was ridiculous and most people saw him, like Shrimpton, as an obvious plant. HAL TURNER was sent to prison for threatening a federal judge. Turner explained it was all an act as he was a high level govt agent. He still was convicted. Shrimpton, too, is a failed operative. If he is convicted by that cockup of a legal system, it really means nothing. Maybe they are trying to strengthen his credibility or maybe they are punishing him for being such a disappointment. Who knows?

    • Gordon Duff  November 13, 2014 at 6:38 am

      Prove there is no DVD.

  11. neodsa  November 11, 2014 at 5:50 pm

    The article says that people who could help Mr. Shrimptons defense are the subject of gagging orders. Is it likely that Mr. Shrimpton would have been aware , before he contacted the authorities regarding the bomb threat , that these people would have been prohibited from giving evidence . If no, then I think he will be safe , if yes then I think he has a problem.

    • Gordon Duff  November 11, 2014 at 8:13 pm

      Michael was a total idiot to call MI6. As far as I am concerned, you don’t report crimes to criminals.

    • neodsa  November 12, 2014 at 9:09 am

      Mr. Shrimptons stories I’ve read here at VT are beyond my comprehension , they may be bunkum or I might be too far down the food chain to understand them . The jury will be greatly swayed by whether or not he seems credible to them , in that he truly believed that his sources would/could back him up and therefor was acting in good faith and happy for his story to be tested . As you say though he should , given his understanding of things , known who he was dealing with.

    • Gordon Duff  November 13, 2014 at 6:40 am

      we were saving space…monitor room is expensive

  12. Bartered  November 11, 2014 at 3:32 pm

    Despite Shrimtons odd personality and sometimes absurd methodologies he is still willing to serve the public in a manner that suits him. The information world is riddled with propaganda intended to hide the truth through deception and blatant lies for the sole purpose of changing the subject, so any attention to a real event even if its twisted is a positive affirmation that the event in question is revealed. I hope he gets back to a normal dysfunctional life and uses the trial to air some serious dirty laundry.

    • Gordon Duff  November 11, 2014 at 8:14 pm

      Shrimpton is a decent and honorable person albeit that he is an Israeli worshipping moron from time to time.

  13. Robbie the Pict  November 11, 2014 at 2:48 pm

    As usual, Shrimpers is providing entertainment at a lot of levels, including just being himself. However this is a criminal prosecution wherein the Crown has to prove that the accused knew perfectly well that the story was a hoax, and knew it beyond reasonable doubt. His defence is relatively simple, namely that he had reason to believe. The quality of his reason indeed will be tested and much depends on his defence witnesses, but it is actually a big plus for him if he is being denied attendance of certain would-be defence witnesses. As our Editor says, it not for Shrimpy to prove it, only report it as a good citizen. The elaborateness of the plot must not be allowed to deter the suspicious citizen. What if Shrimpy had phoned the US Defence Secretary on 9/10 and said ‘I’ve just heard from an intoxicated spook close to the Bush family that jets are going to fly into the Pentagon and the Twin Towers in NY tomorrow morning, and they’re setting up something called the War of Terror worldwide and blaming Muslims forever’?
    If Shrimpy’s closing speech to the jury includes a line like ‘What was I supposed to do? Let them kill our Queen?’ his chronic name-dropping may just work out for him on this occasion. The burden of proof that Shrimpy knew, beyond reasonable doubt, that it was a hoax is on the Crown. Hilarious either way!

    • Gordon Duff  November 11, 2014 at 8:15 pm

      As Robbie is so damned smart, why doesn’t he do more work around here? He is getting more active but he has waited 6 years to get around to it.

    • Wayne Jett  November 12, 2014 at 7:54 pm

      Is it within the realm of possibility that prosecution of the case is going forward for the purpose of providing a forum for presentation of evidence that Fukushima’s tsunami was, in fact, an “attack,” not merely an earthquake followed by catastrophic effects? If MI6 black hats were in control, it seems likely they would not want this prosecution to meet the public eye.

    • JS  November 14, 2014 at 8:06 pm

      I was thinking the same thing. And Benjamin Fulford seems to think so. In his Nov 11 article, he says the trial will expose Fukushima, as well as more of the high-level pedophilia network that is being investigated in the UK.

  14. captain obvious  November 11, 2014 at 12:33 pm

    yeah mister “GERMANY DID IT!!” is a (very) strange case, and as much as I really dislike his articles and BS (aka Barrister Shrimpy), if he felt there were a real and credible threat then did everything he thought he possibly could to try to avert a pending disaster (even if it were only in his mind!), I DO NOT feel he should be punished for it. I do find it boggling he writes here, continually holding up fully discredited “official stories”, which is a completely different issue.

    the GAG ORDERS on people who may be able to help him in this case is just as disgusting as the gag orders to the people who demolished SHES, that supposedly got a bomb threat AFTER being flattened?

    • jake gittes  November 11, 2014 at 12:56 pm

      The bomb threat (if one really existed) was allegedly at he “new” SHES (that miraculously became available mere days later after “the event.”)

    • jake gittes  November 11, 2014 at 1:11 pm

      I echo the sentiments that I don’t often find myself agreeing with Shrimpy’s articles here, but I hate to see someone railroaded for reporting something deemed important. And in this day and age, one has to consider that the reason he is being drug into court to be discredited is because it’s TRUE.

      It would be fantastically ironic if this case were what caused the house of cards to topple, opening the window for the public to peer into what the deep state/shadow government/illuminati have been up to. Shrimpy’s ego will be impossible to live with, but it would be well worth it, and maybe even worth a “cracking” new spy movie.

    • jake gittes  November 11, 2014 at 1:12 pm

      clarification — discredited because what he reported is true

    • Gordon Duff  November 11, 2014 at 8:17 pm

      between terror lists, no fly lists and gag orders, about a third of VT has some kind of chain around their necks.

    • captain obvious  November 11, 2014 at 10:48 pm

      I wouldnt doubt that, and the shame of it is they cite “national security” meaning the 10 square mile independant nation “District of Criminals”, not the people of all the states they deliberately harm! (IMHO).

  15. OrdinarySerf  November 11, 2014 at 12:16 pm

    First time I am aware of that the history and existence of the DVD has been brought up in a British court and also reported widely in court reports of the national press publications, such as the Daily Mail, Daily Telegraph, Daily Mirror. That in itself is an amazing development, although significantly not all news outlets here in UK are choosing to pick up on it. Haven’t heard anything on BBC radio yet for example (I don’t have a TV).

    Much will depend on who Michael can call as witnesses to back up his research and how much is going to be struck out as inadmissable by the presiding judge. A warning shot came in the judge’s comment to Michael regarding ‘conspiracy theory’ although what the judge is reported to have said is nonsensical actually, as in…..

    “I will not have conspiracy theories bandied around the court unless they are genuinely real”.

    That one made me smile !

    The prosecution are clearly trying to discredit his credentials in the intelligence field but he is an extremely canny operator and it has become increasingly apparent in the last two or three years that the public is much more aware (via the alternative media) of the lies that they are being fed daily by government and government agencies.

    We must hope that the awareness is there in the makeup of that jury. He has incredible courage but I do have serious concerns as to how his rather eccentric persona will play out with a jury. That could go either way.

    • Robbie the Pict  November 11, 2014 at 3:43 pm

      Meritorious comments Mr Ord, to which may I add that the Judge has already threatened his neck with physical violence in the form of a guillotine, for merely straying from the path of proper procedure. Shrimpy has never been on that path in his life! Trusting that the threat is not too literal, what practical sanction might any Judge hope to apply to Shrimpy when he is determined to run his mouth and has lots of track for so doing. Condemned to the cells for contempt while trying to conduct your own defence? Asking him to purge his contempt after a couple of hours and carry on? Compounded hilarity. Wish it was within commuting distance!

    • OrdinarySerf  November 11, 2014 at 4:09 pm

      Up in the middle of England now Robbie, but if I was still living in London I would have been in the public gallery every day to see how he navigates the minefield (no pun intended) – sitting right next to you there and enjoying a wee dram or eight in a local hostelry afterwards !

      Any citizen has a duty to pass on information of this nature and it is for the authorities to act on it. I mean, he didn’t exactly ring up anonymously as a real hoaxer would now did he ? So if he sticks to the simple truth in his summing up and asks what anyone would do in the same circumstances, if they were in possession of information relating to a potentially catastrophic threat, then I cannot see how any jury could find against him.

      Of course, that is the rational perspective…..

  16. jake gittes  November 11, 2014 at 11:34 am

    Two guys who take a lot of heat – Shrimpton and Fulford – together at the trial?

    http //

    “The defendant has lined up multiple witnesses to bolster his claim that the nuclear terror threat was real and that Japan had already experienced a nuclear terror attack. This writer is scheduled to be one of the witnesses at the trial.

    The trial is important because it will bring lots of information that has appeared online under the forensic scrutiny of a criminal court. If the evidence is good, it will then lead to criminal charges eventually being filed against the perpetrators of 311. The Japanese and North Koreans involved in the attack have been offered, and have accepted, amnesty in exchange for providing information about 311.”

    • jake gittes  November 11, 2014 at 12:54 pm

      Ask Fulford. He wrote it, not me.

    • jake gittes  November 11, 2014 at 1:00 pm

      (but I would venture to guess that every country has among its citizens, traitors. that is certainly evident in the USA)

    • Gordon Duff  November 11, 2014 at 8:18 pm

      after the rest of us are forgotten, shrimpy and fulford may well be all that are left

    • Gordon Duff  November 13, 2014 at 6:43 am

      are they liars and fraudsters? what if they aren’t? you can’t prove them to be such. They, on the other hand, could prove that you continually receive information from proven liars, were educated by proven liars and, in fact own both a computer and television, keeping you continually connected to legions of proven liars.

    • JS  November 13, 2014 at 3:25 pm

      Way to go, Duff!

  17. Klaatu Aquinus  November 11, 2014 at 11:26 am

    “…who and why wants to destroy Germany political standing in the world?”

    My conjecture ..

    Germania has been a front for the Holy Roman Empire for how long? Certainly long before Trent. At some point, even the best of “useful” fronts has an expiration date. The DVD is not Shrimpton’s invention. He just discovered it, although he may misinterpret its complete function. When we tie the thread of Himmler’s uncle, being that right hand of Ledochowski, then things begin to come into focus.

    Further exploration of this contention will require no less than a semester of post-grad study and discussion. When we tie in the “smoke of Satan” from Fr. Martin together with the pre-production research by id Software in developing “Return to Castle Wolfenstein,” believe me, the two are most related. It would appear, that Heinrich the Fowler, may well have been a gibborim. (what RTCW portrays) What more to explain an unusual fascination (dare say — obsession) Himmler had with the founder of Germania. What better founder and leader of a nation/people, than a literal giant?

    Again, my conjecture ..

    Understand, I’m a German through and through. Both sides of the family. Membership in both the Hildebrandt and Junker clans ..

  18. Jack Heart  November 11, 2014 at 10:59 am

    Why didn’t he just tell you and leave it at that? Their probably going to remove him from the Bar or whatever it is the Brits do when they take away your license to practice law. Much as I disagree with just about everything he says, or at least his conclusions, I feel bad for the man. I feel bad for his friends too, sounds to me like their going to use this trail to try and embarrass people, it should have been plead out. Don’t worry Mr. Duff every dog has its day…

  19. FauxScienceSlayer  November 11, 2014 at 10:23 am

    Freedom has Few Friends in this Fight. VT often praises Putin, without balanced history. Per “Comrade J” by Pete Earley, on KGB agent Sergi Tretyakov, Putin was a low level, East European operative elevated under crooked Yeltsin. At the time of the Fall of the Berlin Wall there were few millionaires and scant multi-millionaires in Russia. Within a year of Yeltsin, mafia and robber barons had looted all the national assets and there were 30 billionaires. Putin has had 50 reporters snuffed, as well as other ‘witnesses’ world wide. If useful in exposing and deposing the western Demonic Warlords, fine. His use need to be limited, for Russia and for Universal Freedom.

  20. Ann  November 11, 2014 at 9:11 am

    The UK big shots are going psycho. After all this time of Shrimpton’s writing they decide all of a sudden that he’s a threat? No way. He’s British to the bone, and would never knowingly put his compatriots in danger. He poked a parasite nest, or maybe he got too close to the truth. He wouldn’t be the first and he ain’t the last.

    So this is all about him reporting a threat? Isn’t that what our overlords tell us to do? If you see something say something? So he did and they crack down on him like a ton of bricks? What was his other option? Say nothing? But isn’t that what they don’t want? If he didn’t and something happened would they crack down on him for that, too? I’m confused. But nowhere near as confused as the UK big shots.

    Don’t they have a police force in the UK? Aren’t they taught to do things like follow and investigate leads, then verify or eliminate? What’s the point in reporting if they shoot the messenger? Don’t they know that many leads turn out to be nothing? Isn’t that their job–to determine veracity? Are they so stupid after all this time that they don’t see a set up when it’s slapping them?

    One thing is for sure–six and four legged vermin operate in the dark, and lash back when the nest is disturbed. Then they disperse. The only difference is that the six/four-legged kind eventually set up shop somewhere else whereas the two-legged kind additionally lie in wait and even the score at a later date. Shrimpton probably upset a nasty rats’ nest.

  21. Bravo  November 11, 2014 at 8:58 am

    At the end of the day he is going to need evidence and supporting facts rather than just hearsay from European sources.

    To all intents and purposes it appears as if the ability to produce evidence and supporting facts are being blocked.

    His trial is concerning a Bomb Hoax and he needs to prove it was not a hoax – to overcome this hurdle it needs to be demonstrated what his intent was; whether malicious, in ignorance or in genuine concern.

    Circumstantial evidence such as E3’s being stood down are of course circumstantial at best.

    I don’t see any way around this unless he can call upon his prior European sources – at best he turn this into a conspiracy against him, or maybe he is being played himself.

    In any case, as prior poster noted, being your own defense has as many dangers as being your own psychologist.


    • Gordon Duff  November 11, 2014 at 9:05 am

      The sources that support Shrimpton are IAEA and FBI investigators under gag order. None are European.

    • Gustavo  November 11, 2014 at 9:59 am

      It says more than once in the text that Shrimpton picked his information from ‘credible European sources’.
      I believe that is what Bravo was talking about.

    • Gordon Duff  November 11, 2014 at 10:02 am

      a point several have made Shrimpton’s job was to pass on what he heard, not prove it. MI 6 is paid to prove things.

    • Gustavo  November 11, 2014 at 11:00 am

      After this trial, nobody will ever again report anything they find suspicious.
      I wouldn’t say anything even if I saw the bomb and the plans to detonate it, if this is what happens to people trying to alert the authorities.
      This is beyond absurdity.

  22. Curmudgeon  November 11, 2014 at 8:40 am

    I could care less if Shrimpton is gay. My issue with his columns is not what, but who. His assertions of plots are not outside the realm of possibility, and often provide plausible background context. The real issue is the continual insistence that the DVD is behind every ill known to mankind.

    Given – the German Government is a NATO (US) occupied government; NATO governments themselves are Zionist occupied governments; and Zionists have infiltrated every intelligence operation or movement , it would be impossible for the DVD, if it actually exists, to be anything other than an another creation of the Zionists. For starters, where would they get their funding? Occupied Germany has no ability to hide money.

    Mr, Shrimpton’s suggestion that the Queen could be a target are entirely plausible. After all, she has, for decades, spoken about dark forces at work about whom we know little about. The dark forces are not German, they are Zionist.

    • JS  November 13, 2014 at 3:29 pm

      The newspapers on Nov 11, reported that there was extra security at the Cenotaph due to threats to the Queen. This was reported at the same time that the same papers, with a straight face, were saying that the Olympics threat to the Queen is a hoax. Everything the media and gov’t do is absurd.

  23. Cold Wind  November 11, 2014 at 8:09 am

    I follow with rapt attention the whole Shrimpton imbroglio, but I admit considerable scepticism regarding Shrimpton’s self avowed (and possibly embellished) curriculum vitae. I do vaguely remember, however, a brief and negative allusion to Mr. Shrimpton by Roberton Coen and Eric Nadler in their work “The Anthrax War” , whereby Michael Shrimpton was cited as having tried to disrupt a key interview with a person of interest regarding the mysterious death of Dr. David Kelly, a known bio-warfare expert. Coen/Nadler describe Shrimpton as a low level government agent (MI5?). Of course, the author is right, the case against Shrimpton is strange and suggests several underlying agendas. Who knows what will come out of it? For now, my impression that Michael Shrimpton is nothing more or less than an Israeli apologist still holds.

  24. guitargirl  November 11, 2014 at 7:55 am

    The last thing the Brits wanted to know from
    Mr. Shrimpton, that their plot to bomb the
    Olympics 2012 in coordination with the usual
    bad asses, was discovered.

    I wish Mr. Shrimpton my best!


  25. Gordon Duff  November 11, 2014 at 7:48 am

    He does do that.

  26. Gordon Duff  November 11, 2014 at 6:09 am

    Funny thing, was told how easy it was by EU naval intelligence guys. It was described to me exactly how it was done at Bremerhaven, how the sub went under in the harbor and past a frigate, sitting there helpless.

    • adeUK  November 11, 2014 at 9:19 am

      Uboat Type XX1 (21) is a museum exihibit at Bremerhaven

      William Bauer, Donitz’s Steath Submarine

      https //

    • LightSaber  November 14, 2014 at 2:09 pm

      “All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.”

      “Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment — that which they cannot anticipate.”

      “He who is prudent and lies in wait for an enemy who is not, will be victorious.”

      “Thus the expert in battle moves the enemy, and is not moved by him.”

      “Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance.”

      “Rouse him, and learn the principle of his activity or inactivity. Force him to reveal himself, so as to find out his vulnerable spots.”

      “Wheels of justice gind slow but grind fine”

      ― Sun Tzu

  27. Gordon Duff  November 11, 2014 at 6:06 am

    this is not shrimpy’s passport but rather a source supporting shrimpy but NOT allowed to testify on his behalf

  28. Tiu  November 11, 2014 at 4:34 am

    The plot to assassinate reminded me of a book I read, called Fenian Fire by Chirstie Campbell, about a plot initiated by members of the “ruling class” led by Lord Salisbury, aka Robert Cecil (the Uncle of Arthur Balfour for whom the phrase “Bob’s Your Uncle” was coined) to assassinate Queen Victoria at her 75th Jubilee celebration using unwitting Irish American’s to do the job. In order to carry out the creation of radical Irish Republican’s (later to become the IRA) it was necessary to establish MI5. Their first task was the creation of a radical movement to discredit the very popular Irish Home Rule movement led by Charles Parnell – an issue which gripped Britain for the century right up to the outbreak of WW1.
    As a side note I suspect my great-great-grandfather might have been on of the thousands of civil war veteran Irish Americans who were encouraged to return to the UK during that time.
    It’s a very readable and seems a very well research book, I’d recommend it and suggest the modus operandi has been used over and over again since then.

  29. potai  November 11, 2014 at 4:33 am

    Shrimpton saved the queen?
    Oh man, say it ain’t so!

  30. adeUK  November 11, 2014 at 1:00 am

    The document you refer to is entitled “Scenarios for The Future of Technology and International Development” published by The Rockerfeller Foundation.May 2010.

    A scenario on page 34 refers to an “Olympic Bombing killing 13000 people.

    http //

  31. ProtectUSA1st  November 10, 2014 at 10:43 pm

     As they say you are innocent, until you found guilty.
     Reading Shrimpton’s VT articles, almost all of them sounded “Strange”

    • Gordon Duff  November 11, 2014 at 6:12 am

      I tend to agree.

    • adil  November 11, 2014 at 10:43 am

      Not only strange but it defies physics.! 2004 tsunami with one nuclear bomb? Did he ever did basic math to see energy differences?

    • moneytalks  November 12, 2014 at 9:28 pm

      Nuke tsunami sounds reasonable to me . I was within 15 miles of a USAF carpet bombing operation and my chair was rumbling as I sat in it . A single nuke has millions of more tons of TNT than the B-52 bombing squadrun that did the op . Ask Duff , he could probably verify this . Have you done the math ?

  32. Simpleton  November 10, 2014 at 10:24 pm

    Gays and Jews have a symbiotic relationship, each needs the other. Bibi may yet buy bi-swinger Shrimpy some time before a final bye-bye swinging from Tower Bridge instead. The real question is, has he been employed by the alien reptilians to introduce the once unthinkable premise of a nuclear pre-emptive strike into the mainstream psyche, in preparation for a strike on Natanz? A la Sheldon Adelson, who seems to have been muzzled by Obola’s Justice Dept on money-laundering charges.

    • Gordon Duff  November 10, 2014 at 10:50 pm

      Shelly just bought the Senate.

    • Simpleton  November 10, 2014 at 10:53 pm

      The timing is in sync with Wendy Shermans final instructions (a la nudelman/pyatt), to scupper the P5+1 Oman talks with a “stadium changer” missile limitation demand at this late stag , the earlier attempts at merely moving the goalposts having failed? Obola’s secret letter to Khamenei may have been designed to be just as deceptive as his Cairo speech to the muzzies (with a phone call to Mitt asking a favor to add spin and bolster its dubious sincerity), before he rolls out a pre-planned B2 strike?

    • Simpleton  November 10, 2014 at 11:21 pm

      With the khamanei letter “leak” engineered just as cunningly as that mic deliberately left on to broadcast the “netanyahu is a liar” conversation with sarkozy to the whole world, only to seamlessly lead to the Libyan bombing that followed. We are talking extreme satan here, spin to nuclear bomb for!

    • Gordon Duff  November 11, 2014 at 9:36 am

      the Khamanei “leak” is a fabrication by Christy “Rubin” Amanpour and her handlers.

  33. Mike Kay  November 10, 2014 at 9:51 pm

    Mr. Duff,
    There is a fine line between being well informed, and insanity.
    The well informed cannot help but connect the dots, and sometimes those connections lead to very nonordinary conclusions.
    Things shift and change, and its sometimes impossible to find any solid ground.
    Mr. Shrimpton is certainly well informed. I don’t know if he’s insane, but I tend to think he will certainly appear this way as his trial winds along. I do wish he had secured legal counsel for himself. Acting as one’s own lawyer is similar to acting as one’s own psychologist, and can lead to similar complications.
    Certainly the spectre of a contiguous German organization employing refurbished subs from WW2 has all the stench of yet another Israeli fantasy designed to keep the goy divided. It also is the stuff the public will, most likely, be fed in copious portions, with bells and whistles, to destroy Mr. Shrimpton’s credibility.
    If it is not too late, Mr. Duff, you might suggest he find himself some competent legal aid.

    • Simpleton  November 10, 2014 at 11:09 pm

      Oh bugger! You dont even know who pushed through all this gay marriage legislation then, lover boy?! Now go and apologise for the zios over their love-filled recent Gaza massacre, whilst you are at it add a few bad words about Hamas too and before you know it, they will push through a National Gay Pride holiday for you too, they control the legislatures. Or are you yet another devilishly cunning yiddish troll with this trained patter like old jewles?

    • Gordon Duff  November 11, 2014 at 6:17 am

      The US Navy, until recently, was using refurbished German Type 21 subs. These subs were used for covert operations. After the Shrimpton arrest, the Wikipedia describing how many were refurbished and how long they were used was altered.
      This is not entirely unlike the cleansing of facts about Russian built aircraft and their ability to shoot down MH17, where all internet sights were altered, all of them, cutting the operational ceiling of the SU attack planes in half in order to protect the Kiev junta from an investigation.

    • stevengaylord  November 11, 2014 at 12:51 pm

      April 30 1945, the situation at sea was nearly hopeless for most U-boat captains. But for KK (Korvettan Kapitan) Adalbert Schnee, his situation was different. Of the two new operational Type XXIs, he was in command of one of them – U-2511. Schnee was under orders to sail from Bergen, Norway, and to make his way to the Carribbean. His orders were not to attack any ships on his outbound journey, but the boat was detected by an anti-submarine patrol group. Traveling faster underwater than the escorts could on the surface, he easily outran the escorts. He was in command of a new boat, one which would make hunting as easy as it had been during the “Happy Time”. Then on May 3 1945, the unthinkable, but inevitable happened. A message from BdU Germany had surrendered. All U-boats were ordered to cease hostilities and were to sail to the nearest allied port under a black flag. Nevertheless, U-2511 had the British cruiser HMS Suffolk in its sights. Schnee carefully evaded the heavy escort screen, closed in to 600 meters of the cruiser, and raised the periscope. The torpedoes were primed, and he ordered the tube doors opened. As the British cruiser crossed the targeting crosshair on his periscope – instead of giving the order to fire, he simply cursed, lowered the scope, dived under the target and made off for Norway, unknown to those sailing above him.

      http //

    • Mike Kay  November 11, 2014 at 3:01 pm

      Understood, sir. Still, the navy in question is our own, not German, or perhaps they are currently one in same…
      Either way, I fail to find that a landless group of terrorists could continue to exist without significant material support from some entity or entities, thus while it is possible that some semblance of the DVD continues its operations, it cannot possibly do so in a vacuum. We have plenty of modern examples of this.If anything, the most likely (rogue) nation offering support and a home base would be Israel. With its extensive network of organized crime, including human trafficking, not to mention its love for terrorism, it would be a natural.
      Further, its just twisted enough that the narrative of the undying nazi threat would serve organized jewry handsomely.
      I can’t help the feeling that Mr. Shrimpton was set up by the same ones who fed him this narrative.

    • dirtus napus  November 11, 2014 at 11:21 am

      He choosing to defend himself, even though he’s a barrister, concludes what I’ve always seen in him.

    • Mike Kay  November 11, 2014 at 2:45 pm

      Personally, I don’t care the least bit if you prefer your own gender, just don’t expect me to humor you, especially when you post responses to other people’s posts on my thread.

    • moneytalks  November 12, 2014 at 10:33 pm

      It cannot be stressed enough that altho [ individualism ] is a useful and valid ideology it is also the quintessential non-manipulative dividing method for the tried , true and trusted { divide and conquer } tactic . Many of the goy cultures//populations currently at risk from ziojew destruction are already divided to the individual unit by virtue of their own individualism ideology . In other words , the ziojew divide-and-conquer tactic is halfway accomplished from the start by [ individualism ] and the conquer part is all that remains for the ziojews to do . Fortunately , goy individualism cultures do not need the same [ collectivism ] expertise and sophistication that ziojews have from thousands of years of practice because the goy vastly outnumber the ziojews ; so that the goy do not need the same high degree of collectivists skills to compete against ziojews .

    • moneytalks  November 12, 2014 at 10:43 pm

      Keep in mind that a cooperative group — a collective — can usually , when all relevancies are about equal , defeat ANY number of individuals one at a time ( if not more at a time ) . It will take a collective of allied nonjews to defeat the self-proclaimed { divinely chosen ones } . Nonjews generally have access to most of the same technologies that ziojews have access to . Unfortunately , jews control most of those technologies that nonjews only have access to under nonconflict circumstances . Failure to defeat the satanic ziojews will ultimately mean extinction for nonjews . Here is a link to further important details on this matter —

      http //

      ……… you must insert a colon to link at [[ http ]] to make it work …………

      The apparant inability of nonjews to perceive a ziojew existential threat is their greatest problem .

    • jake gittes  November 13, 2014 at 4:30 am

      “The apparant inability of nonjews to perceive a ziojew existential threat is their greatest problem .”

      i.e., “the greatest trick the devil ever played was convincing the world he didn’t exist.”

    • moneytalks  November 13, 2014 at 5:19 pm

      10 – 4

  34. zen master  November 10, 2014 at 8:30 pm

    Israel is good at inventing fictional enemies, Al Qaeda, now DVD maybe. I wonder if they got the idea of Bout being DVD from Siegfried off Get Smart? … if DVD exists they’re at least more discreet than Mossad, who seem to be bumblers always rubbing your face in their crime.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network