Part 1 : On Domination Games
A new article by Kevin MacDonald on China is well worth reading. The article begins with these words: “Tablet [magazine] has an article reflecting Jewish angst over the possibility that the Chinese might think that Jews run America: The Chinese Believe That the Jews Control America: Is That a Good Thing?“
MacDonald then goes on to give an extensive quote by the author of the Tablet magazine article, Clarissa Sebag-Montefiore (pictured), in which the young Jewish writer does her best to pooh-pooh the whole idea that Jews control America.
When someone with the name “Sebag-Montefiore” pens an article, the world has to sit up and pay attention. This is because the Montefiores belong to one of the most venerated Jewish families in England—the crème de la crème of British Jewry—the other great Jewish families in England being the Rothschilds, the Sassoons, the Freuds, the Joels, the Neubergers, and the Harts.
Ms Sebag-Montefiore is clearly at pains to convince the Chinese—who she knows will be reading her article with avid interest—that any such idea of Jewish power in America is a malicious anti-Semitic canard.
The Jews, she would like to persuade the Chinese, have at best a marginal influence on American affairs. True, it’s often alleged by people who ought to know better that Jews own the media and Hollywood, but these silly assertions have to be taken with a pinch of salt. The Chinese, with their high intelligence, will see through these specious claims—or, in Ms Sebag-Montefiore’s predictable parlance, “entrenched stereotypes.”
Henry Ford would of course have another view on all this. Writing almost 100 years ago, he said: “Controlling the world’s sources of news, Jews can always prepare the minds of people for their next move.
Here is Ms Sebag-Montefiore doing her valiant best to persuade the Chinese into viewing the Jews through rose-tinted Jewish spectacles:
“Do the Jews Really Control America?” asked one Chinese newsweekly headline in 2009. The factoids [note the dismissive word “factoids”] doled out in such articles and in books about Jews in China—for example: “The world’s wealth is in Americans’ pockets; Americans are in Jews’ pockets”—would rightly be seen to be alarming in other contexts. But in China, where Jews are widely perceived as clever and accomplished, they are meant as compliments.
Scan the shelves in any bookstore in China and you are likely to find best-selling self-help books based on Jewish knowledge. Most focus on how to make cash. Titles range from 101 Money Earning Secrets From Jews’ Notebooks to Learn To Make Money With the Jews.”
And now for the flattery: the attempt to prove that Jews and Chinese are kindred spirits under the flesh, united by common ideals and noble aspirations:
“The Chinese recognize, and embrace, common characteristics between their culture and Jewish culture. Both races have a large diaspora spread across the globe. Both place emphasis on family, tradition, and education. Both boast civilizations that date back thousands of years. In Shanghai, I am often told with nods of approval that I must be intelligent, savvy, and quick-witted, simply because of my ethnicity.”
Without waiting to finish the article—I was to race through it later that day—I posted this comment on my website:
“Though it is obvious to all of us that the Jews control America, it astonishes me that they still keep pretending they don’t! They appear to be concerned right now that the Chinese might get the “wrong idea” that they control America! They would obviously like to dupe the Chinese into thinking they are pretty harmless.”
To this comment I received a thought-provoking response from writer Franklin Ryckaert, a veteran commenter on Kevin MacDonald’s The Occidental Observer: “It wouldn’t astonish you if you knew about what is called ‘aggressive mimicry’, which is defined thusly : ‘Aggressive mimicry is a form of mimicry in which predators, parasites or parasitoids share similar signals with a harmless model, allowing them to avoid being correctly identified by their prey or host.’” (See here)
“Jews are parasites who want to exploit, control and eventually destroy their host,” Ryckaert went on to explain, “but because they are everywhere a small minority they must resort to certain strategies so as not to be identified and expelled.
First of all they do that by hiding their identity (assuming non-Jewish names, “converting” to another religion etc.) and by staying as much as possible in the background (as “adviser” of a leading figure but not as the leader himself). Secondly they project the image of themselves as harmless, powerless or even as oppressed and persecuted. Hence the stress on the Holocaust story.
This is why the Jews don’t want to be seen by the Chinese as in total control of America. China is their next host and they need to be seen as harmless.”
Ms Sebag-Montefiore’s entire article founders on that one withering sentence:“CHINA IS THEIR NEXT HOST AND THEY NEED TO BE SEEN AS HARMLESS.” A penetrating comment, without a doubt, though not exactly flattering to our Jewish cousins.
“Well, let’s hope the Chinese are smart enough to avoid the fate of the Americans. America is now little more than a slave colony dominated by Jews. That the Americans were unable to learn from history—from the complete takeover of Germany and Russia by the Bolshevik brigade—is a sad reflection on the American character.
Didn’t they see it coming? If they did, it seems they weren’t too bothered: like the English who threw in the towel long ago and were quite happy to accept serfdom under the Jews: (a) provided it was dressed up as “democracy”, and (b) provided the loot was divided up in such a way that the gentile aristocracy were not excluded from a place at the pig’s trough.
The Brits and the Americans, you could say, were willing to make a Faustian pact with the Jews: that as long as the Jews made a certain percentage of them rich, letting them be part and parcel of the predator elite, there would be no complaints. Hollywood is a case in point, and wherever celebrities like Madonna are manufactured. Fabulous wealth is showered upon these non-Jewish degenerates as long as they serve their elite masters faithfully.
I’m not sure the Chinese will be any more successful than our Western countries in resisting the wiles of the Jews. Bribery and blackmail may well do the trick. The important thing is to keep the masses sedated. As long as the slaves are allowed to think they are in control and are made to enjoy their slavery, life will go on.
This quote by Aldous Huxley says it all: “A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.”
Franklin Ryckaert agreed. He expressed the hope that the Chinese, for their own sakes, would be a bit smarter than the dopey Americans who had allowed themselves to be sold down the river.
“We can only hope that the Chinese will be able to avoid being corrupted by the Jews. Their high intelligence, realism and traditional values might be of help, but we must also keep in mind that they already have been once victims of the destructive ideology of Communism, which is Jewish after all. Under Communism the Chinese repudiated their traditional values, condemned Confucianism as “feudal” and during Mao’s Cultural Revolution even destroyed centuries old art treasures. If one Jewish ideology could subvert them once, another one could do it for a second time.”
Kevin MacDonald goes on to quote Ms Sebag-Montefiore again, this time about media control. She seems inordinately anxious to persuade the Chinese that the whole concept of Jewish control over the media is an anti-Semitic canard to which even the Chinese (sigh sigh) appear to have succumbed.
“Just before my visit to Nanjing,” she points out plaintively, “the Chinese tycoon Chen Guangbiao made international headlines by publicly announcing his ambitions to buy the New York Times and later the Wall Street Journal. In a TV interview he explained that he would be an ideal newspaper magnate because “I am very good at working with Jews”—who, he said, controlled the media.”
“Who, he said, controlled the media.”
Note the cunning way that’s put. Poor Chen, it seems to suggest, has somehow gotten the silly idea that Jews control the American media! Where on earth did he get such a bizarre idea from? Oy veh, do grow up already Mr Chen, you silly-billy Chinese billionaire!
The flamboyantly generous Chen Guangbiao (pictured), one of China’s 400 richest men, flew into America a year ago and announced to everyone’s surprise his wish to buy up the New York Times. Apparently the Jewish shareholders refused even to meet him to discuss the proposition and his bid was scorned (cartoon pic).
He then said he wanted to buy up the Wall Street Journal, another Jewish-owned newspaper. With engaging chutzpah, he had said he would like to give these Zionist papers “more balance”— a comment which doubtless caused considerable alarm in cosmopolitan circles.
Failing to make any headway in acquiring unbalanced American newspapers, Cheng finally consoled himself with throwing a slap-up lunch in Central Park for 250 homeless New Yorkers
A pity the Chinese billionaire was not allowed to give “more balance” to the Jew-owned mass media by smashing through their monopoly—something that has led to the complete zionization of America in an Israelified police state and the crippling psychological jewification of the American people.
THE JEWISH OWNED MEDIA
Here is a famous quote from the Protocols of the Elders of Zion on Jewish media control, a book which acclaimed Norwegian Professor Johan Galtung, author of 100 books and more than 1000 scholarly papers, heartily recommends to readers in spite of its bad reputation as a “forgery”. (See here). Galtung was particularly impressed by this quote on the media from Protocol 12:
“Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies …. These agencies will then be entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them. If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the goy communities to such an extent that they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the coloured glasses of those spectacles we are putting astride their nose.”
Kevin MacDonald concludes his essay on China with a veiled warning to the Chinese not to pay too much attention to Jewish doubletalk, as represented by the honeyed phrases dripping from the pen of Ms Sebag-Montefiore:
“Honest discussions of Jewish power and influence—whether it’s the Israel Lobby, Hollywood and the media, Wall Street, or immigration and multiculturalism—are to be made off limits, not only in the U.S., where there is an elaborate, lavishly funded infrastructure to ensure it, but also in China where Jewish money is already having a major effect on the boundaries of legitimate discussion.
China as a rising power would do well to view Jews through the lens of realism and empirically based discussion. As elsewhere, however, there are already forces that are pushing in the opposite direction.”
We have so far devoted this essay to the prospect of a Jewish takeover of China. The entire idea, admittedly, seems ridiculous on the surface. Ms Sebag-Montefiore would turn up her nose and dismiss it all as a “wild-eyed conspiracy theory.” She has been at great pains, as we have pointed out, to persuade the Chinese that if Jews should ever come to China in ever-increasing quantities in the foreseeable future they will be doing so as friendly and altruistic do-gooders.
Never mind that every single country to which the Jews came in the past was beset with innumerable problems soon after their arrival.. Never mind that they have been expelled from 109 locations from the year AD 250. Never mind that they have been perceived and stigmatized throughout history as unmitigated pests. Never mind that over 60 millions Russian Christians were put to death by them in the Soviet Union under Lenin and Stalin in the gulags and cheka dungeons. Never mind that they have now taken over America. This time it will be different. Totally different.
But wait—hold on!—perhaps we need not worry too much about the Chinese being taken over. It seems they are already aware of the Jewish bid for world domination. Far from being unduly concerned about being taken over, some of them have already begun to talk about modeling Chinese behavior on Jewish strategies for attaining wealth and power.
They want to study the Talmud, incredibly, to see if the wise rabbis of ancient times have any hot tips on how to make them as stinking rich as the Jews! And while they are about it, why not make a close study of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion to see what ingenious ideas these clever Jews have to offer on World Domination?
It sounds almost like a Swiftian satire. Enough to give the genteel Ms Sebag-Montefiore a fainting fit. Heck, if the Jews can take over America, why can’t we Chinese have a bash at it too!
Here is Professor Xu Xin addressing an American audience. Listen to him carefully. Is he serious or is he pulling our legs?
“I think it is obvious that Jews control the Western world. They run your media, universities, and much of your government. They tell you who to wage war on, who to fight, who to support and how to spend your money. This is what we Chinese want to understand when we study Jewish dominance and hegemony of the West.
There are literally so many instances of how you have fallen for Jewish tricks. Hitler was the last person to openly contest Jewish rule and look how he is viewed. He is hated because of what Jews taught you with their films and books.
We Chinese are amused at how gullible white men are. We want to find the same way to shape your thoughts. This is why we study them, the Jews.”
Fun times ahead! What with the Jews chatting up China, like the Big Bad Wolf playing nice with Goldilocks … and with the Chinese half-jokingly planning to study the Talmud and the Protocols with a view to taking over America from the Jews.
Part 2 : Opium, Sex and Death
It is a sad and sobering fact that the Jews are already deeply entrenched in China and have been been so for centuries. As an erudite China watcher on my site was quick to point out recently, the sinofication of Jewish names was already underway during the time of the Ming Emperors several centuries ago:
“During the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644), a Ming emperor conferred seven surnames upon the Jews, by which they are identifiable today: Ai (艾), Shi (石), Gao (高), Jin (金), Li (李), Zhang (張), and Zhao (趙); sinofications of the original seven Jewish clans’ family names: Ezra, Shimon, Cohen, Gilbert, Levy, Joshua, and Jonathan, respectively. Interestingly, two of these, Jin and Shi, are the equivalent of common Jewish names in the west: Gold and Stone.” (See here)
Jews had in fact arrived in India via the Silk Road almost 1000 years ago, well before Marco Polo made his way to the Court of the Grand Cam (Khan) in distant Cathay (China) in the late 13th century. Waves of Jews were to follow them in subsequent centuries until China finally acquired its own thoroughly assimilated Jews, the Kaifeng Jews, indistinguishable from the Chinese. Iraqi Jews, Jews taking flight from Russia, Jews fleeing the Nazis in their tens of thousands, all these came flooding into great melting pot of Shanghai.
There were even high-profile Jews in the Chinese Communist Party, including the American Jew Sidney Rittenberg and the journalist Israel Epstein. (See here)
The shameful opium trade in China, into which the easily corrupted Brits were drawn by Rothschild money, was in fact the brainchild of a British sephardic Jew, Elias David Sassoon. He was joined in this ignoble enterprise by another British Jew, Silas Aaron Hardoon, his partner in the firm E.D. Sassoon & Co.
The origin of the conflict between China and the Rothschild-backed East India Company—i.e., the Jew-ridden nucleus of the British Empire—can be found in this bland statement about the First Opium War:
“In the 17th and 18th centuries, the demand for Chinese goods (particularly silk, porcelain, and tea) in the European market created a trade imbalance because the market for Western goods in China was virtually non-existent; China was largely self-sufficient and Europeans were not allowed access to China’s interior….
The British East India Company had a matching monopoly of British trade. [It] began to auction opium grown on its plantations in India to independent foreign traders in exchange for silver.
The opium was then transported to the China coast and sold to Chinese middlemen who retailed the drug inside China. This reverse flow of silver and the increasing numbers of opium addicts alarmed Chinese officials.”
To deconstruct and simplify:
Europe wanted tea, silk and porcelain from China, but China was self-sufficient and needed nothing in exchange from Europe. The result was a trade deficit in which Britain (via its East India Company) owed China an enormous and increasing amount of silver.
How did Britain try to solve this tricky problem? It left it to the Jews who formed the nucleus of the East India Company to come up with a neat solution.
The East India Company began to grow opium on its Indian plantations. It then transported the processed opium to Bombay and Calcutta where the crop was sold by auction to “independent foreign traders.” This innocuous phrase—“independent foreign traders”—needs translation. It is of course a euphemism for Jewish merchants.
There were not only swarms of British and European Jews in India at this time, concentrated mostly in the port cities of Bombay and Calcutta, but an entire community of Indian Jews: namely, the Cochin or Malabar Jews (see this picture) who had made their home at the southernmost tip of India from earliest antiquity.
The Jewish merchants who had bought the opium in India then shipped it to China on their opium clippers where it was exchanged for silver from “Chinese middlemen”—most of whom were Kaifeng (Chinese) Jews—another fact that has been carefully concealed by our politically correct court historians. These Chinese Jews thereupon proceeded to distribute the opium all over China, causing an epidemic of opium addiction among Chinese of all classes, ranging from the elite landowners and mandarins to the lowest coolies and rickshaw pullers.
As for the silver received from the sale of the opium, this not only helped to narrow the British trade deficit with China but enriched the East India Company’s vast army of officials, many of them Jews.
This, then, is how the British Empire became so powerful: by winning two Opium Wars with the help of Rothschild money. (The First Opium War: 1839-1842; the Second Opium War: 1856-1860). The Brits grew rich on Chinese tea, Chinese silk, Chinese porcelain, and acquired Hong Kong on a 99-year lease. And on this they built their Empire, with the help of the mercantile Jews.
What did China get in exchange? — Millions of opium addicts. By 1905, it has been calculated, 27 percent of Chinese males had become addicted to opium, with “13.5 million people consuming 39,000 tons of opium yearly.”
When we look back at the British Empire, and the part played by Jews in bringing it to the pinnacles of wealth and power, we cannot but help reflecting on Balzac’s famous epigram: “Behind every great fortune lies a great crime.”
OPIUM WAREHOUSE IN INDIA (1850)
This iconic image of an opium warehouse is a lithograph produced by Bengal Commissioner Lt. Col. Walter S. Sherwill. The production and distribution center was located in Patna, India. Here 13 million pounds of opium juice were processed in giant vats and compacted into sticky, grapefruit-sized balls (see picture above), the workmen being expected to roll 100 balls a day. These were then placed in chests and sent to Bombay and Calcutta, from where they were shipped out to Canton in China. (For more details, see here)
Here is a map showing the route from the opium warehouses in Bombay and Calcutta to Canton in China. And here is a chart showing the huge growth of British opium exports to China between 1729 and 1832. Thereafter, trade was to improve spectacularly as the number of Chinese addicts soared to over 10 million.
Did the British care? Apparently not. Growing rich on the sufferings of others, as all predator nations know, is the iron rule of life. It’s known as the Survival of the Fittest. The Jews were indisputably the driving force behind this evil trade, as today they are behind the evil pandemic of porn addiction. Then it was opium, now it is pornography. New addictions for new ages.
Curiously enough, opium dens often doubled as brothels.
Among other things—painkiller, anesthetic, stupefacient, hypnosis inducer, euphoria giver—opium was also a powerful aphrodisiac and had been associated with sexual performance since the 16th century. According to Chinese physician Li Slizhen, writing in his Compendium of Materia Medica (1578), opium had the ability to confer extra stamina and staying power during intercourse, since it had the ability to “arrest seminal emission.”
Gorgeous young Russian girls and slant-eyed Asiatic Jewesses were available for sex in the opium dens of Shanghai. These sordid dens of vice where emaciated men poured their semen into the voracious vaginas of opium-addicted girls—for whom sex was a way of paying for their next opium fix—spread to the great Western cities: to Paris, London, Berlin, New York, and San Francisco. By the late 19th century, there were 200,000 opium addicts in the United States, three-quarters of them women.
Here (see the Punch cartoon below) is how the jingoistic Brits, under their Jewish mentors, treated the Chinese in the heyday of the British Empire. The Chinese would do well to remember these past humiliations and do their utmost to keep the old colonialists raptors out of their country.
We have now learned a valuable history lesson. The Chinese intelligentsia today are doubtless acquainted with these basic facts. They too must know who their historical enemies are.
If they have any doubts, let them open their history books and a litany of Jewish names will spring from those musty pages, the names of all the Jews who helped to plunder their ancestors via the British Empire: Elias David Sassoon and Silas Aaron Hardoon, partners in E.D. Sassoon & Co, as already mentioned above, in addition to Edward Ezra, Morris Cohen—described by the South African Sunday Express in 1945 as “the guiding genius behind the War Lords of China”—Jacob Borodin (aka Grusenberg),Trebitsch Lincoln (British MP), BK Galen (aka Chesin), Skidelski, Gekker, Koslowsky, Snamensky, MD Lashewitz, WN Levitscher, A Joffe, R. Haas, JB Rajchman, Ben Kizer.
All these names will be found in an essay written by Arnold Leese, a notorious anti-Semite, so maybe he shouldn’t be taken too seriously when he concludes his exposé, The Jewish Rotting of China, with these shocking words:
“Every key position in the process of the Bolshevik destruction of China has been Jewish.”
The prospects for the world do not look good. We are not talking here any longer about the “takeover” of China by the Jews. As Franklin Ryckaert, with his astute observation on aggressive mimicry might say: “The parasites have already taken control of the host’s body.”
When the time is right, I predict, the Jews will jump ship en masse and make China their next cash cow and kleptocracy—but not before they have destroyed America, leaving behind a Third World country in ruins.
Here, in this multicultural hell pit of existential despair, the remnants of the white race will have to put up with rape and murder on an unprecedented scale, like the Russians and Germans in the first half of the 20th century at the hands of the same Bolshevik Jews.
The sun is setting on the American Empire and night is about to fall, like the blade of an axe on the neck of the bleating lamb.