Revised and expanded, Feb. 2, 2015. Lethbridge Alberta Canada.
Rev. Stephen Sizer, the Church of England Vicar of Christ Church, Virginia Water in the Diocese of Guilford is once again in professional peril for standing up to the forces of Zionist-induced, Zionist-promoted Islamophobia.
This time Reverend Sizer is charged with mirroring on his Facebook page a small sample of the large and growing body of evidence demonstrating that Israeli-American neocons were lead protagonists in the 9/11 crimes. They directed the complex of US and Israeli agencies that cooperated in the commission of the 9/11 debacle itself and in the coordination of the many subversions entailed in the continuing and increasingly desperate 9/11 cover-up.
Rev. Sizer’s Chief Inquisitor is Jonathan Arkush, Vice-Present of the Board of Deputies of British Jews. The Board of Deputies of British Jews has been bullying the Church of England in a thuggish fashion ever since a meeting in 2012 at Lambeth Place, the official residence of the Archbishop of Canterbury.
The General Synod, the Church of England’s highest legislative body met at Lambeth Place to consider strengthening ties with the Ecumenical Accompaniment Program in Palestine and Israel (EAPPI).
Rev. Sizer and the Church of England’s Shift Towards Christian Zionism
as an Active Agent of the Board of Deputies of British Jews
This ecumenical body, the EAPPI, is a proponent of the Durban Strategy of applying Boycotts, Divestments, and Sanctions (BDS) to the political economy of Israel. Underlying the BDS campaign is the allegation that Israel is an apartheid state. The Durban strategy emerged from the UN’s World Conference on Racism in Durban South Africa just days before the 9/11 debacle burst onto world history.
The new Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Webly, voted for the BDS-supporting EAPPI, a move he subsequently announced while on a trip to Israel in 2013 that he “regrets.”
Archbishop Webly was an oil company executive in Paris and London during the 1980s. During this period he came under the evangelical spell of Rev. Nicky Gumbel, the Tony Robbins-style Vicar of the new evangelical jewel of the Church of England, Holy Trinity Brompton in mid-town London. Citizen Webly was rejected in his first bid at ordination but he subsequently was accepted to join the Anglican clergy
Some have observed that the Vicar of Holy Trinity Brompton is in fact more influential these days than his convert, now theoretically second in command of the Anglican Church after Queen Elizabeth. Where the membership of the old-style Church of England Churches is fast
diminishing, Holy Trinity Brompton along with its slickly-packaged Alpha courses and its smooth-talking Vicar are drawing in droves of recruits for the more aggressive and expansionary armies of Jesus the entrepreneurial fundamentalist.
Both Archbishop Webly and Vicar Gumbel have recently discovered significant Jewish roots in their family tree. Rev. Gumbel referred to his Jewish heritage, including ancestors killed in the Holocaust, in a TV interview with the Israeli Ambassador to the UK, Daniel Taub. This recent turn to the Office of the Archbishop of Canterbury under the influence of Holy Trinity Brompton’s Anglican superstar is suggestive of an Anglican embrace of Christian Zionism whose most learned and devoted critic in the UK is Rev. Sizer himself.
Reverend Sizer’s subjugation to yet another Anglican Inquisition was prompted by his posting of the Wikispooks article on his Facebook page, now removed. The Wikispook item is entitled “9/11: Israel Did It.” In the removed post Rev. Sizer asks the rhetorical question, “Is this Anti-Semitic? If so I’ll be asked to remove it. It raises so many questions.” Indeed, the very well documented Wikispooks item does raise many questions, the primary one being how come the primary suspects have not yet been taken in for police questioning with so much evidence pointing to the Israeli-American neocon cabal whose lead members called for a new Pearl Harbor a year before 9/11.
Jewish News Online, which advertises itself itself as Britain’s biggest Jewish news outlet, conducted an E-Mail exchange with Rev. Sizer reporting
Sizer seemed to defend his actions in an email to the Jewish News, saying: “I would welcome articles you can recommend refuting the allegations.” Noting that many Americans feel 9/11 was “an inside job,” Sizer added: “It is essential the public become convinced of what happened before and after 9/11. Inevitably the truth will upset many people if it is shown by further investigation that the official explanations are shown to be deficient.”
He added: “Encouraging research and debate on all aspects of [9/11] is not anti- Semitic… Suppressing discussion on such grounds will fuel suspicion, not remove it.”
Rev. Sizer’s main Inquisitor, Jonathan Arkush, said of Rev. Sizer’s comments, “Posting, and giving approval to, an article which in effect accuses Jews of responsibility for the 9/11 atrocity is unquestionably anti-Semitic, just as it is beyond absurd.” Arkush added, “I am extremely concerned that a Church of England minister could possibly have considered it appropriate or becoming to his position to advertise such racist nonsense… his language is “very, very strongly offensive to Jews” and regarded as “anti-Semitic” by the community…. ““The church should be taking action. He is one of their ministers. It should not be left to the Jewish community to have to protest and be forced to take action from outside.”
Arkush’s comment is not measured and reasonable. Pressing allegations on some in Mossad, some in the the CIA, some Israeli-American neocons as well as some in several agencies of the US government and media is a proposition very different than blaming all Jews generically for the lies and crimes of 9/11. Moreover, Arkush’s unrestrained charge begs the question why so many Zionist supporters of Israel treat it as an self-justifying imperative to blame Muslims generically for 9/11 and for many other murky events often wrongly depicted as the independent acts of Islamic jihadists.
As Nafeez Ahmed and many others have well chronicled and documented, the requirement of pumping up the psychology of Islamophobia to create public opinion in the West conducive to support for the primary protagonists in the so-called Global War on Terror have often involved Gladio-style operations including Western handlers, funders, crisis actors, propagandists and agents provocateurs. In this psychological warfare troubled and unstable Muslim individuals are sometimes played and exploited as patsies or worse in a cynical con game whose lethal outcomes are often very real.
and World World Trade Centre Building 7.
The way the events of 9/11 were immediately interpreted without any objective investigation completely transformed the world’s geopolitical landscape. From the first hours of the debacle it was reported by the Zionist-controlled media that 9/11 was not as a crime to be investigated and solved but rather an act of war committed by Islamic jihadists. It was an aggression to be met by invasions of foreign countries in complete contravention of all established principles of international law.
Just as the BBC miraculously announced the demolition of World Trade Centre 7 before it actually plunged to the ground, the BBC was quick off the mark to publish a smear article against Rev. Sizer. The BBC’s report mirrored the allegations of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a favoured agency in the formulation of BBC’s very slanted pro-Zionist coverage of public affairs. On Sept. 11, 2001 the BBC notoriously reported the collapse of World Trade Centre 7 twenty minutes before the event actually occurred at 5:21 pm.
WTC 7 was a 47 story steel-frame skyscraper that housed many of New York’s most secretive intelligence and security agencies. It was not hit by any airplane but nevertheless plunged symmetrically into its own footprint at near free fall speed. The WTC 7 event is sometimes referred to as the smoking gun of 9/11.
An expert in the history and politics of the Christian Zionist movement and an outspoken advocate of the need to recognize and respect the human rights of the Palestinian people, Rev. Sizer has become the primary sacrificial lamb in the Church of England’s efforts to appease the Islamophobic blood lust being generated by Crusader Jonathan Arkush and the Board of Deputies of British Jews.
I participated with Rev. Sizer in the New Horizon Second International Conference of Independent Thinkers and Film Makers in Tehran last autumn. The conference was met with a smear job bounced along an echo chamber of Zionist media. The multitude of sources all repeated the same simple message initiated by a press release from the infamous Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League, a well-known instrument of Israeli foreign policy.
The echo chamber was made to resonate with four magic-laden terms and their derivatives, CONSPIRACY THEORIST, ANTI-SEMITISM, HOLOCAUST DENIAL, and 9/11 TRUTHER. To be accused of any one of these categories of thought and attitude is basically to be accused of all four. The connotations that have come to be attached in popular culture to these four terms is propagandistic in intent. The aim of this propaganda is to head off evidence-based discussions of the real geopolitics of changing relationships of power.
The intensity of the Zionist media spin deployed to discredit the New Horizon conference in Tehran was especially unrelenting during these times when the Global War on Terror is being rebranded. This transformation involves the replacement of the CIA’s creation, al-Qaeda, with the Zionist-engineered DAESH or ISIL (ISIS) as it is referred to in North America. Recent manifestations of this rebranding have unfolded in the series of Mossad-style false flag terrorist events that took place in Ottawa Canada, Sydney Australia, and in mid-January in Paris France where Benjamin Netanyahu himself was present on the ground to oversee and direct Israeli operations.
The barrage of Western media loathing aimed at the participants in the New Horizon conference confirmed for me the linguistic importance of the Zionist hexes CONSPIRACY THEORIST, ANTI-SEMITISM, and HOLOCAUST DENIAL. Along with loaded terms like “radicalization” and “extremism,” the term 9/11 TRUTHER is the new addition to the terminology of Zionist demonology and semantic obfuscation.
The first three of these expressions, the traditional terms authorizing from on high societal shunning, have been so twisted and exploited for their propaganda value that they have been stripped of their original power. The deeper meaning of the fourth term, “9/11 Truther,” is yet to be decided.
The quest for the truth of what did or didn’t happen on 9/11 presents a way out of the quagmire of lies and deception empowering the protagonists of the 9/11 Wars. These 9/11 Wars involve simultaneously aggressive invasions of foreign territories as well as internalized domestic wars– cynically instigated civil wars– involving attacks on civil liberties, human rights, genuine self-determination, journalistic and academic integrity as well as the viability of positive interaction in multi-cultural, multi-religious and pluralistic societies.
Those who give legitimacy to the semantic travesty embodied in the four linguistic horsemen of Zionist demonology without self-conscious care and evidentiary substantiation expose themselves to justifiable charges that they are either intellectually impoverished or actively corrupt and complicit in terrible crimes against humanity.
Holocaust revisionism is not Holocaust denial. No chapter of history is ever fully explained and analyzed for all time and no interpretation is beyond being refined, improved and brought into conformity with new evidence. Criticizing the Jewish state of Israel for war crimes and crimes against humanity is not anti-Semitic, a problematic and Hitlerian racial category that should be transcended in any case.
Theorizing about possible conspiracies, in other words about two or more individuals getting together to commit illegal or otherwise unsavoury acts, is not an act of lunacy but rather a necessary facet of living in decent democratic societies.
Those controlling disproportionate concentrations of wealth and power have more means with which to conspire and it is therefore absolutely necessary to scrutinize especially carefully their decisions and actions because of their more-far-reaching consequences for everyone.
Finally, we have had more than enough of 9/11 lies and very little of 9/11 truth in our main centres of government and mass communications. Those once-somewhat respectable agencies of mass communications like the BBC are rightfully being abandoned by millions in favour of venues like this VT news web site.
Decent folks prefer lies over truth, especially when it comes to the interpretation of events of enormous consequence like 9/11. Decent folks would rather be perceived as truth tellers, not con job liars like so many of the talking heads we see on TV.
Naturally Stephen Sizers defence of the human rights of the besieged Palestinians led him to the conclusion that the intent of the 9/11 false flag terrorist episode has been, and remains, the pumping up of Islamophobia to create the psychological conditions necessary for the continuation of the 9/11 Wars. The originating episode of the ongoing 9/11 Wars was meant to advance Israel’s expansionary designs by transforming its regional enemies into the global enemies of an elaborately engineered conception of “the West.”Islam is not an aberration in the West or a new infusion but rather and old and integral part of Western Civilization.
Benjamin Netanyahu has been the first to acknowledge the outcome of the false interpretation of 9/11 was actually good for Israel. His Likudnik cabal networked throughout Israel, the USA and the NATO countries, however, was not the only beneficiary. The 9/11 false flag trigger event was made to serve the primary beneficiaries of the permanent war economy of the United States and its NATO allies by replacing the defunct Soviet enemy with a new global enemy of largely-manufactured and manipulated Islamic jihadism.
Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, Visiting Holocaust Museum in Israel, 2013
“The Most Reverend Justin Welby, who recently revealed he regretted not voting against a General Synod motion backing a group which places Christian human rights observers in the Occupied Territories, is due to visit both Israel and the West Bank.”
24 May, 2014