NEO – Ukraine, Fighting the Spin

7
1408
Are many in the Separatist Republics looking through rose colored glasses - joining Russia like Crimea?

World-refugee-day___
___…  by  Gordon Duff, VT Sr. Editor,  … with New Eastern Outlook, Moscow_

__
“Say what you mean and mean what you say” — General George S. Patton

–  First published  …  March 3, 2015  –

 

Psychological warfare patch
Psychological warfare patch

There was no coup or revolution in the Ukraine. It was an invasion and it is still going on. You have an opponent “on the run” when you get them to accept your narrative.

The term, roughly translated as Revolution of Dignity, was cooked up at the Jamestown Foundation in Washington, well in advance of Victoria Nuland’s assumption of the throne as de facto “Queen of the Ukraine,” lording over her subjects, playing the role of “donut dollie.”

The roots of the conflict in the Ukraine with thousands dead and the threat of, minimally, a wider regional conflict, are attributable to extremist elements in the United States — those faces and voices seen and heard promoting the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, the supporters of ISIS/Al Qaeda in Syria — and the cheerleaders of the continued genocide against the Palestinian people.

Half of any war is the war of words — words kill more, in the end, than any weapon.

The current battle in the Ukraine, coup within coup, counter-coup or civil war, all words, got out of hand long ago. Over the past days, the “narrative” used by the West has failed; the Kiev “government” is no government, only warring factions, “toadies” of a broader and clearly quite international conspiracy.

__________________________

A Classic -- Israelis pull up their chairs and watch the Gaza slaughter
A Classic — Israelis pull up their chairs and watch the Gaza slaughter

Let’s examine where it went wrong. In February 2014, ultra-nationalists including NATO security services, Polish special forces, Israeli commandos and extremist elements within Ukraine moved against the elected pro-Russian government, one that had obtained huge subsidies to help keep the Ukrainian economy afloat.

Enough documents have been released — citing coup-backed snipers killing dozens of protesters, US embassy officials planning false flag attacks, extremists downing a passenger airliner and NATO peddling falsified intelligence — to make it very clear that the “coup” is more of an invasion than anything else.

The issue of “containing” or surrounding Russia has been at the head of Western policy since the announcement of the Truman Doctrine in 1947. Expansionist moves by NATO are only a continuation of those policies. That they are visibly coordinated with “Islamist” wars in the Middle East and Africa is more than anecdotal.

NATO simply moved into the Ukraine under the cover of a political upheaval — one NATO itself orchestrated and one backed by broad criminal elements, many of which are also involved in backing Al Qaeda and ISIS.


Among these are think tanks, public relations agencies, financial institutions, oil and armaments interests, which by current definition can be referred to as “the usual suspects”.

Donetsk airport destroyed by Western oligarchs -- but the fight goes on
Donetsk airport destroyed by the weaponry of Western oligarchs — but the fight goes on

Documenting this last statement is relatively easy: tracing shiploads of specially modified trucks, some bought by Saudi Royals, armed in Israel, shipped by train through Jordan, funded by stolen Syrian antiquities and stolen oil — even entire factories stolen from Syria and trucked into Turkey, run there with profits shared by ISIS.

This is what General Wesley Clark, former NATO commander was talking about when he cited NATO’s role in creating ISIS, in a TV interview last week.

What is the real situation on the ground? Is the conflict in the Ukraine an invasion or a coup? First we must consider international law. As the “takeover” never consolidated power, it must be considered, coup or invasion, an ongoing operation.

The idea that a “coup” that fails to gain political control of merely one region of a nation and then holds an election — in that one region only, within one ethnic group, possibly a minority group, as the language using of Ukrainians has long been a subject of debate — is absurd.

The idea that a junta in Kiev could hold an election there without participation in Eastern Ukraine, and claim to be a “republic” is not only a violation of the Geneva Convention, but third-rate political spin as well.

Widespread and large-scale armed resistance by a substantial percentage of the population of the Ukraine now long subjected to indiscriminate attack by heavy artillery, with thousands dead, more than negates any claim of political legitimacy.

It could and perhaps should be asserted that the Eastern regions are “loyalist” and are resisting an ongoing coup attempt. All is semantics. Then again, NATO’s discussions of arming the Kiev junta, in order to aid a “coup” in consolidating power, steps well over the line.

_____________________________________

Geneva Convention – What does it mean?

Geneva convention

Even such a suggestion by NATO constitutes a violation of the Geneva Conventions and is, by definition, clearly “aggressive war” through implication alone.

The presence of mercenary troops, “military contractors,” though an issue not considered when the Geneva Conventions were penned, would under any reasonable standard be considered an invading force. From the Webster Dictionary:

Full Definition of COUP D’ÉTAT:  a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics; especially :  the violent overthrow or alteration of an existing government by a small group

Let’s now look at the definition of a “revolution,” according to Webster:

Full Definition of REVOLUTION

a :  a sudden, radical, or complete change

b :  a fundamental change in political organization; especially :  the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler and the substitution of another by the governed

WarWe flunk on the “a” definition as there is no “complete change.” A stalled or failing “or incomplete “change” leads us to an applicable definition under international law that, with that “other definition” also implies mandatory prosecution.

Let’s now look at a definition of “aggressive war.” This is a place we get a lot of “weaseling around.” This is the applicable language from the Geneva Convention:

“Provision of support to armed bands formed in its territory which have invaded the territory of another State, or refusal, notwithstanding the request of the invaded State, to take, in its own territory, all the measures in its power to deprive those bands of all assistance or protection.”

This would mean that any support from outside the Ukraine for the Kiev junta from the outset in February 2014 through the present day is support of an “armed band.” That the “armed band” may be a militia or claim to be the Ukrainian Army is not germane. Let’s see if we can get closer to something understandable. We will take a look at the Nuremberg Principles from 1945.

In 1950, the Nuremberg Tribunal defined Crimes against Peace, in Principle VI, specifically Principle VI(a), submitted to the United Nations General Assembly, as:

(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;

(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

_____________________________________

Applications from Nuremberg

 

By this standard, if one could establish evidence of a conspiracy beforehand, perhaps on the part of NATO or the United States unilaterally, or even Poland — let’s say training camps set up there to prepare for a coup or revolution of invasion, you choose what you wish to call it — any evidence, even one instance, is all that is needed to meet the burden of proof as established at Nuremberg.

I don’t think anyone would have much difficulty in finding proof for (ii), a “common plan or conspiracy.” This one is pretty much a “slam dunk.”

From the standpoint of international law, prior to the conventions cited above, the adage of “might makes right” was all that was required. Thus, were one nation able to invade and incorporate another and then successfully defend such acts, there was no redress other than more of the same in converse.

If anything, the conflict in the Ukraine presents legal challenges because it is ongoing and the supposed victors – be they coup plotters or surrogates for NATO aggression – seem to be losing.

The semantics of psychological warfare are vital, if ascribing blame or controlling narrative can influence an outcome. What is certain is this: the “spin” prevents any application of statute or treaty, and thus turns the clock back to the era of “might makes right”. Even the most doltish are taking note of this.___

Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War who has worked on veterans and POW issues for decades and consulted with governments challenged by security issues. He’s a senior editor and chairman of the board of Veterans Today, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

7 COMMENTS

  1. Not looking good. Can’t disagree with that. But let’s take a sunnier take: Poroshenko is overthrown after Mother Russia takes half of Ukraine ( which is Russia-friendly ) + the sanctions come off Iran + Bashar Al Assad retains power while more Western-backed ISIS-type rats are exterminated + Bush and friends are indicted for war crimes in Germany + Poroshenko is put on trial for treason. Plus: More Americans realize that WE CANNOT give aid to a nuclear-armed country that refuses to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty ( Talmudia ).

  2. “Half of any war is the war of words — words kill more, in the end, than any weapon”….truth is backed with a force unfathomable, words can also breathe new life…why do they spend every waking moment conjuring up new plays to cover , squash , silence, divert and deflect it…truth dismantles their matrix of lies disintegrating before their eyes…releasing the shackles and freeing the minds of the slaves they can no longer hold captive….invisible walls to divide and conquer now clearly in view..…free to build a better world based on love and mutual respect for a whole global family …minus evildoers

  3. A Message to Our Millions & Millions Vets, Armed Forces, Young Americans (age 18+), Mature & Senior Voters, who ‘LOVE USA’ Netanyahu Showed us to “Clean-up Congress.” Please Vote for USA Not your Party.

     Obama, H.W. Bush & Ronald Reagan has something in common __ the ”Apartheid-Evil- Empire-Israel”
     1981, (35 years ago), another Shameless Israeli PM Menachem Begin, has done almost exactly the same thing to Our President Reagan. ____ The Shameless Begin called Our President Reagan ANTI-SEMITE ___ Note: President Reagan WON! ____
     President H.W. Bush Refused to give Israel (Our 3 Million Tax $) during a Middle East Peace Talk unless they stop the Settlement & when he lost his 2nd Term ____ Netanyahu said, “IT’S the ECONOMY Stupid.” Well, Netanyahu now we know, “It was NOT the ECONOMY, It was ISRAEL.”
     Friday, the EU Head said, Netanyahu’s USA Speech has NO effect on 5+1 & Iran Diplomatic Negotiations.
     One Of The Most Honest World Leader, President Carter Quoting Israeli Scientist’s Leaked Details In The 1980’s (Almost 35-Years Ago) Said, Israel Has At Least 150 Atomic Weapons In Its Arsenal.
     Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, who died in 2013, said
    NON-JEWS are DONKEYS, CREATED TO SERVE JEWS!

    The other Shameless Israel Ex-PM Begin called Our President Reagan ANTI-SEMITE
    http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/Backchannels/2015/0303/Echoes-of-Obama-Netanyahu-
    tussle-in-Reagan-Begin-showdown-of-1981

  4. Uncle Gordie:
    http://orangecounty.craigslist.org/gov/4915002251.html

    Ukrainian/Russian Men Needed $19/Hr (Oceanside, CA)
    © craigslist – Map data © OpenStreetMap
    1833 Oceanside Blvd, Suite A
    compensation: $19.19/Hr

    GTS (Glacier Technology Solutions LLC) – We are military contractors working directly with the US Marine Corps assisting them with their immersive simulation training program.

    Currently, we are looking for role players of Ukrainian and/or Russian ethnicity and language skills. Need MEN ranging 18-65 years of age.

    This is temporary, part time, on-call work based on need and availability.

    At the moment, we are staffing for an upcoming training to take place on:
    March 29-31, 2015.
    Enough said? These are popping up all over Craigslist.

  5. I saw this and posted it to my Facebook wall when it was put up on New Eastern Outlook a few days ago, what i said then still holds true, this is the best piece from a purely clinical analysis that as been written to date on the Ukraine. But what else is to be expected from Gordon Duff? I’ve got just the film to go with it but Youtube is not kidding by censoring it for adults only. Make sure you have a strong stomach before you watch this one. I am reminded of a line from an anti “NAZI” propaganda movie; “everyone knows what we bring…”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-Y-OfjF938

  6. America hasn’t survived, CC.
    What you miss is that the condition of Ukranians forced to fight for their lives against the genocide machine is exactly what we are facing here, in a softer version-for the moment.
    Americans haven’t had anything to do with any of the matters you write about, and have spent much useless effort in attempting to steer a deranged death cult elite away from their appointment with suicide.
    Do not make the mistake of assuming that the elite are somehow associated with Americans. True Americans are powerless, hopelessly indoctrinated playthings of the genocide machine, who are very soon going to be reduced to the status of fighting like hell, just like our brothers and sisters elsewhere- with something other than words.

Comments are closed.