University wimps buckle under Zionist pressure to kill ground-breaking conference


University of Southampton

by Stuart Littlewood


In an earlier article, “Don’t argue, don’t engage, just ignore”, I said the University was a case in point. And a very sad case it turns out to be.

The organisers – the Southampton Law School – say they’ve been told the health and safety risk posed by likely demonstrations is too great. “The University claims that it does not have enough resources to mitigate the risks despite a clear statement from the Police confirming that they are able to deal with the protest and ensure the security of the event. As the law stands, the University is legally obliged to uphold freedom of speech…. the requirement of minimising risk should also fall onto the Police as the agency that is entrusted with the enforcement of the law (freedom of speech) and the provision of security…. It is very clear from the Police’s report that they are more than capable of policing the conference and ensuring the safety of university staff, speakers, delegates, students and property.”

So the advice, “Don’t argue, don’t engage, just ignore” didn’t sink in. The fools let the whiners in the door and handed them an important victory in the Zionists’ desperate campaign to silence any serious debate on Israel. The organisers say they are seeking legal emergency measures to prevent the University from cancelling and persuade it to properly collaborate with the police so that the anticipated demonstrations can be managed.

The Guardian reported that among those who condemned the conference were the Jewish Board of Deputies and MPs including Eric Pickles, the communities secretary, and Caroline Noakes, MP for Romsey and Southampton. The Zionist Federation UK arranged a petition with more than 6,400 signatures opposing the event. A counter-petition signed by more than 800 academics urged Southampton to resist the pressure.

The Board of Deputies complained that the conference lacked balance and focused on “delegitimising the State of Israel”. Their president Vivian Wineman claimed: “It is formulated in extremist terms, has attracted toxic speakers and is likely to result in an increase in antisemitism and tension on campus.”

Jewish News said the conference was being organised by Israeli-born Prof. Oren Ben-Dor, who had previously called Israel an “arrogant self-righteous Zionist entity”. Among the listed speakers was Princeton professor Richard Falk, former UN special rapporteur, who has faced condemnation over his comments on the Middle East, including his suggestion in 2013 that Israel had “genocidal” intentions” towards the Palestinians.

Well-known British journalist Ben White has started another petition urging the university to allow the conference to proceed as planned.

“There is ample time for any concerns regarding the safety and security of university staff, students, and conference participants to be met. The university must fulfill its legal obligation to protect free speech and academic discussion.” The conference was scheduled for 17-19 April.

Under the spotlight is the Vice-Chancellor, Prof Don Nutbeam, who has announced he’ll soon retire. Nutbeam is an academic fat-cat with a package of £333,000 a year. The organisers complain that they’ve been unable to meet with him to consult on the organisation of the conference, and to invite him to open it. “On the other hand, the Vice Chancellor has met with pro-Israel representatives without ever calling us to attend meetings and we, as Professors in the University, feel disempowered and marginalised by this disrespectful behaviour.”

All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. Stuart, like others who have commented, my immediate reaction was why am i not surprised? it is simply one more little tentacle of the obscenity that we call “zionism”, which is a name of convenience for the chief evil evil incarnate in the current global conjuncture

  2. This is not surprising . Since the 9-11 event , the ZWO ruling cabal has instructed all western world universities to discontinue being a venue for free and open debate or enquiry . There has been sheepish obedience to that implicit//explicit instruction here in the USA .

    Israel would be nothing without the sponsorship of the ZWO Rothschild empire which has its world headquarters in the City of London .

    Could also be that Israeli born Prof Oren Ben-Dor is a controlled opposition agent whom wittingly//unwittingly executed part of an ILLuminati modus operandi for undermining dissent — at a law school of all places .

  3. RT really must start to screen its guest speakers a bit more carefully. They are continually shooting themselves in the foot by inviting on shills. Shills are of course expert at camouflage but always manage to spread the poison at key points. Today they reported the cancellation of this discussion in the news (not a surprise to any readers here of course) and invited a noisy ‘student’ to talk about how disappointed he was. The ‘student’ complained that he would have loved to have debated the issue but it was “the Pro Palestinian side” that shut down the debate and cancelled the event. Now call me an old cynic – but I suspect that this young creature was another israeli shill – and that this is NOT quite the way the event was cancelled!

  4. So, after Nutbeam grovels before supporters of Israeli thugs killing Palestinians, he cancels because Jewish thugs might attack his students, and then hides like the coward he is from those of his own he just betrayed. What a man. He’d feel right at home in the US Congress. Mr. Wiseman says criticism of Israel will lead to anti-Semitism–that supposedly always baseless, undefinable and irrational hatred of Jews–and so tacitly implies Israeli behavior is always irrelevant, which in turn implies they have never and can never do anything wrong. I’d ask Nutbeam if this is the case, that Israel has never done anything wrong, and if not, how he justifies allowing its agents to determine who is and who is not allowed to discuss that behavior.

Comments are closed.