Pillars of American “Democracy:” Cloak-and-Dagger Smoking Gun Evidence


Summary: The article you are about to read resolves in principle the cloak-and-dagger controversy.  Since individual cases cannot conclusively prove that the real masters of the USA (=invisible government or bankers) malign, imprison, or murder anyone who poses a threat to their rule, the article takes instead a bird’s eye view of the field of assassination research.  It does so by paying special attention to patterns and statistical comparisons.  This holistic approach leads to three conclusions: 1. The first conclusion is factual, enjoying the same level of confidence as the assertions that elephants trumpet and tobacco kills: the bankers have been murdering America’s best and brightest at least since the days of Abraham Lincoln.  2. Despite overwhelming evidence, not one banker throughout this period was made to suffer for his crimes: The bankers have a license to kill.  3. Their massive assassination program helped the bankers safeguard and bolster their parasitic chokehold on the USA and the world.


“Some of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing . . . know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so  interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”—Woodrow Wilson, 28th president of the United States

“The West has maintained its dominance through murder and robbery on a planetary scale.”—Nikolai Starikov, 2015

The introductory article of this series recalled that the USA is controlled by an Invisible Government (=bankers) and that the bankers’ edifice of exploitation, parasitism, enslavement, perpetual warfare, and ecocide rests on massive, mutually-supporting, pillars.  The second article provided a few examples of the cloak-and-dagger pillar. The present article puts forward statistical and criminological illustrations and arguments which conclusively prove this pillar’s existence.

1DartGun1975. The technology of killing someone and making it look like an accident or a suicide reached a state of high art at least 40 years ago. Here is one illustration.

The nearby photograph shows the late US Senator Frank Church displaying a Central Institute of Assassinations’ (CIA) dart gun that, depending on the poison used, either causes an immediate heart attack or a belated cancer. According to Congressional 1975 testimony, the gun fires a frozen poison-tipped dart.  The tiny dart can penetrate clothing and leaves a barely-visible pin-sized red mark where it enters the victim’s body. In the heart attack version, once in the body, the poison melts, gets absorbed into the bloodstream, and causes cardiac arrest.  The poison then denatures quickly, so that a routine autopsy is likely to ascribe the heart attack to natural causes.

In passing: Church probably paid for his courage–and for his progressive record–with his life. By 1984, at the early age of 59, he died of . . . cancer.

2. Leaked internal memos clearly show that the bankers have given themselves a license to kill. Here is a quote from the death squad’s (CIA’s) 1954 Assassination Manual:

“The contrived accident is the most effective technique. When successfully executed, it causes little excitement and is only casually investigated.”

And here is a letter from a CIA consultant to a CIA officer:

You will recall that I mentioned that the local circumstances under which a given means might be used might suggest the technique to be used in that case. I think the gross divisions in presenting this subject might be:

  1. bodies left with no hope of the cause of death being determined by the most complete autopsy and chemical examinations
  2. bodies left in such circumstances as to simulate accidental death
  3. bodies left in such circumstances as to simulate suicidal death
  4. bodies left with residue that simulate those caused by natural diseases.”

3. We know that the CIA and its allies routinely murder non-compliant foreigners. For instance, few researchers dispute the culpability of Henry Kissinger and Richard Nixon in the assassination of the democratically-elected president of Chile, Salvador Allende. There is likewise no dispute that the American government attempted to kill Cuban leader Fidel Castro, over and over and over again. We know that the bankers played a role in the killing of Che Guevara, Saddam Hussein, and Muammar Gaddafi. We know they imprisoned a Panamanian head of state after invading his country and killing hundreds of innocents.

Are we supposed to believe that these are exceptions?

4. Historically, oligarchs used the cloak-and-dagger approach successfully and often. Saudi and Colombian compradors routinely murder their imaginary or real political opponents, as did the CIA-installed Brazilian and Argentine oligarchs a few decades ago. One of the greatest historical accounts ever written—Thucydides’ History of the Pelopennesian War—is replete with tales of oligarchic murderousness and treachery.  Another typical episode (involving the Gracchi Brothers of Rome) can be accessed here.

Are we supposed to believe that the oligarchs controlling the US/UK are an exception to this historical rule?

5. Now that the bankers’ conquest of the Western World is almost complete, they are more inclined to occasionally come out of the shadows. Here, a former top CIA functionary publicly issues a veiled death threat against the popular leader of a nuclearly-armed country:

“Thugs like Putin  . . . keep going until someone takes them out — permanently — with a knockout punch. . . .  If the only way to get him out of the Kremlin is feet-first, with a bullet hole in the back of his head — that would also be okay with us.  Nor would we object . . . if . . .  his airplane gets blasted out of the sky by some murky para-military group that somehow, inexplicably, got its hands on a surface-to-air missile.”

While we’re on the topic:  It seems to me only a matter of time before the bankers successfully carry out that threat.

6. A sixth line of evidence for the ubiquity of assassinations originates from accounts of former hatchet men and their would-be victims.

Consider the taped deathbed confession of notorious CIA hit man, E. Howard Hunt.  In that recording, Hunt alleges that it was the American government and its CIA darling that murdered President Kennedy.  This confession is especially significant, Larry Chin correctly observes, because it corroborates “work of key John F. Kennedy assassination researchers and historians.”

The second example involves comments of Catherine Austin-Fitts (Assistant Secretary of Housing in the George H. W. Bush’s Administration):

“The result of saying no is physical violence directed at them or their family.  .  .  . I was targeted, I was poisoned, I had dead animals left on my doorstep, and my home had been broken into and people trying to run me off the road. You know it was very, very violent and it went on for years. So people who try to run the government clean or run Wall Street clean are targeted, and literally have to fear for their lives.”

7. The historical record reveals an undeniable pattern: At least since the days of Lincoln, almost all influential enemies of the international bankers—but hardly ever the bankers or their flunkeys—suffer or die prematurely.

This pattern is so undeniable, so strikingly consistent, so ubiquitous, that it in turn raises another question:  How could this pattern escape the notice of almost all mainstream criminologists and historians?

At the moment, let me just say that, after years of studying the short or tragic lives of influential friends of the American people, I can only come up with five possible exceptions to this pattern: Upton Sinclair (died at age 90), Pete Seeger (died at 94), Albert Einstein (died at 76), Ed Asner (85, alive, and a 9/11 doubter), and Oliver Stone (still alive at 68).

8. The next corroboration is closely-linked to the above, this time involving longevity statistics of the bankers’ whores and foes.

The methodology in such cases is straightforward.  At times, scientists might examine two groups of people who are comparable in every way except one.  Let’s say the difference is that members of one group smoke tobacco while members of the other group do not.  If non-smokers live considerably longer, and if the longevity gap is so consistent and large that it could not be reasonably attributed to pure chance, scientists deduce that tobacco kills.

To support the assassination hypothesis, we can carry out precisely such an analysis, replacing tobacco with bankers’ enmity as the critical variable.

The grandfather and namesake of this bludgeoned toddler was, from 1907 to 1917, Bankers’ Enemy #1. In 1917, for instance, Congressman Lindbergh had the temerity to try to impeach members of the Federal Reserve Board, including the all-powerful Paul Warburg

Our first group consists of late influential Congressmen who consistently defied the bankers.  In the past 100 years or so, memory brings to mind the following: Louis McFadden (died at age 60, having survived two earlier probable assassination attempts), Charles Lindbergh Sr. (65; having endured the burning of his book, government shadowing, bribery attempts, shots fired on his car during a political campaign, and the probable revenge-and-warning killing of his 20-month-old grandson and namesake), Huey Long (42; the most defiant, progressive, and dangerous of them all!), John Kennedy (46), Robert Kennedy (42), Ted Kennedy (dead at age 76, after miraculously surviving two probable assassination attempts), Paul Wellstone (58), John Heinz (52; “staunch critic of the Fed”), John Tower (65; “staunch critic of the Fed”), Larry McDonald (48; courageously accused the Rockefellers and their allies of a “plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent”), and Frank Church (59).  Mean age at death for this small sample:  56.

We need to compare these victims of conscience to congressmen who were faithful servants of the Rockefellers. In his 1906 “The Treason of the Senate,” David Graham Phillips conveniently lists 21 such traitors.The average age at death of these 21 senators is 73.  So: 73 vs. 56:  Even if you choose to forget all other lines of evidence presented in this article and in numerous studies, this one disparity should convince you that assassinations are as American as apple pie.

We may note in passing that, true to form, the Rockefellers managed to have Phillips himself assassinated (aged 43)—and get away with this murder too. As well, the biographies of these 21 Rockefelleritos show that Rockefellerism in this  upside-down world of ours pays—not only in longevity but also in honors and riches.

9. Wikipedia provides a government-approved list of assassinated American politicians.  Despite its numerous oversights, this list is instructive.For the sake of consistency and brevity, let us focus on just one sub-group on that list: the six congressmen and ex-congressmen murdered since 1915.The first four are discussed elsewhere in this article: Presidents John F. Kennedy and William McKinley and presidential candidates Robert F. Kennedy and Huey Long.To my surprise however, the list contained two additional individuals.  I immediately asked myself: Were they enemies of the bankers too?

Alard Lewonstein was a progressive, anti-war, one-time congressman elected in 1968.  By 1970, he was gerrymandered out of office. Lewonstein crossed the bankers’ red line in 1975:

“Lowenstein was one of the most vocal critics of the unwillingness of Los Angeles and Federal authorities to reopen the investigation into the June 6, 1968 assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy. Lowenstein’s one hour appearance on the PBS television show Firing Line in 1975 . . . was one of the first times the American public were shown that many elements of ballistic and forensic evidence were radically at odds with eyewitness testimony and the assumption that Sirhan Sirhan alone had shot Senator Kennedy.”

He was murdered in 1980, age 51, allegedly by a madman.

Leo Ryan was also a man of conscience:

“After the Watts Riots of 1965, Assemblyman Ryan went to the area and took a job as a substitute school teacher to investigate and document conditions in the area. In 1970, using a pseudonym, Ryan had himself arrested, detained, and strip searched to investigate conditions in the California prison system. He stayed as an inmate for ten days in the Folsom Prison, while presiding as chairman on the Assembly committee that oversaw prison reform.”

Ryan crossed the line in 1974:

“Leo Ryan’s murder is seen by many as being much more sinister than the hysterical behavior of a madman. Leo Ryan had been a strong critic of the CIA and was the author of the Hughes-Ryan Amendment, which, if passed, would have required that the CIA report to Congress on all of its covert operations before they commenced. Soon after Ryan’s death, the Hughes-Ryan Amendment was quashed in Congress. The question conspiracy theorists ask is whether Ryan was killed in order to reach this objective and the massacre at ‘Jonestown’ merely a smoke screen to distract attention away from Ryan’s murder?”

Ryan was murdered in 1978, age 53, in a coordinated, highly professional, attack.

So here we go again:  All 6 victims were thorns on the side of the Invisible Government.  By contrast, not one congressional bootlicker of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers appears on that list—even though such bootlickers far outnumber their decent colleagues.

10. According to Karl Popper, the power and appeal of any real scientific theory is derived in part from its ability to bring forward falsifiable predictions. The assassination hypothesis passes this criterion with flying colors.

Indeed, assassination researchers can often answer the question “who is next?” They have learned that when anyone crosses a red line, accidentally or by design, it is just a matter of time before the bankers spring into action.

Speaking for myself, every time I run across a historical account of an influential challenger to the bankers’ rule and schemes, I immediately try to find out whether that person died prematurely or was made to suffer for her courage.  In the majority of cases, my dire guesses meet with “a success unexpected in common hours.”

Likewise, every time an influential person suffers or dies prematurely (e.g., Lewonstein and Ryan, above), my first question is: Was s/he an enemy of the bankers?

Cloak-and-dagger researchers can likewise predict future events.  I knew that Charlie Sheen would get into trouble after he publicly expressed doubts, on September 8, 2009, about the official version of 9/11. Sure enough, three and a half months later he was temporarily arrested, 5 months later his car was stolen and fell off a cliff, 9 months later he was sentenced to 17 days in jail, 12 months later his ex-wife was arrested, 18 months later he was fired from his popular TV show and allegedly suffered an emotional breakdown.

Similarly, as the British Petroleum 2010 Gulf catastrophe unfolded, I didn’t know enough to predict the many associated mysterious deaths and disappearances. However, I was convinced that the most prominent critic of the criminal handling of that catastrophe, high-level oil industry insider Matt Simmons, would pay for his courage.  In 2010, Simmons died of a “heart attack in the bathtub.”

But don’t take my word for it.  One documented prediction of the assassination hypothesis is available here.

Is the Cloak-and-Dagger Strategy Effective in Sustaining and Strengthening the American Oligarchy?

To see how assassinations or attempted assassinations can alter the course of history, take the example of American presidents since the days of Andrew Jackson.  Jackson himself miraculously survived the bankers’ plot to kill him–and delayed their program of world conquest by decades. They have learned their lessons well since then.  Zachary Taylor died in office, and he too was perhaps insufficiently compliant. Lincoln and Kennedy really annoyed the bankers–and were assassinated. Garfield and McKinley might have been thorns in their side too–and were assassinated. Franklin Delano Roosevelt was sufficiently troublesome to try to remove from office through a failed Nazi putsch, and he too died in office. Wilson was their yes-man to begin with, but towards the end became an outspoken critic–and he had been incapacitated in office.

But the effectiveness of assassinations goes far beyond presidents.  Might not history have unfolded in a radically different way had the bankers:

  • Abstained from routinely and openly framing, jailing, and murdering union members and leaders?
  • Let influential artists like Ernest Hemingway, Richard Wright, John Lennon, Jim Morrison, Bob Marley, and Phil Ochs live?
  • Not assassinated Martin Luther King, Mohandas Gandhi, and at least 5 members of the Kennedy clan?
  • Let Aldo Moro, Salvador Allende, Omar Torrijos, and Hugo Chavez live?

Parting Words

Like organized crime, organized finance parasitizes planet Earth in part through a program of vilifications, smears, incarcerations, and murders.

Our discussion raises a fundamental question:  Can we remove the murderous bankers from power peacefully, or must we give them a bit of their own cloak-and-dagger medicine?

Dr. Preston James, for instance, believes that:

“Fire must be fought with fire, and the day is soon coming when We The People must take the gloves off and truly go after these oppressors of humanity with a closed fist and make war against them at every level by every means we can muster. This will actually be a repeat of the American Revolution and the War of 1812, and the British banksters will have to be driven out and eradicated from America once again.”

Cloak and dagger is one of the pillars undergirding the unjust, chained, militaristic, and unsustainable contemporary world edifice.  That pillar could perhaps support that edifice on its own, but the bankers like to play it safe.  As we shall soon see, over the centuries they have constructed and solidified many other powerful pillars.

Author Details
Dr. Moti Nissani is a jack of most academic trades and professor emeritus, Wayne State University.

DISCLOSURES: All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. I believe Congressman Hale Boggs was assassinated when his plane “crashed” in Alaska and was NEVER FOUND. Hale and two other members of the Warren Commission did not agree with the conclusions. If Hale had lived, he would have been highly influential and powerful enough to resurrect a proper investigation of the JFK assassination…

    “It is a myth that the Warren Commission was united in its conclusion that a lone assassin killed President John F. Kennedy. On the seven member Warren Commission, there were three dissenters: Senator Sherman Cooper, Senator Richard Russell, and Congressman Hale Boggs. As Dallas journalist Jim Marrs pointed out, “The most vocal critic among Commission members [was Hale Boggs]. Boggs became frustrated with the panel’s total reliance on the FBI for information. Speaking of the ‘single-bullet theory,’ Boggs once commented, ‘I had strong doubts about it.’ On April 1, 1971, House Majority Leader Boggs delivered a blistering attack on [FBI Director] J. Edgar Hoover, charging that under his directorship the FBI had adopted ‘the tactics of the Soviet Union and Hitler’s Gestapo.’ Boggs, who undoubtedly would have become Speaker of the House and a powerful ally in any reopening of the JFK assassination investigation, vanished on October 16, 1972, while on a military junket flight in Alaska. Despite a massive search, no trace of the airplane or of Boggs has ever been found.”


    • Thanks! I’ll add Boggs to my draft Cloak-and-Dagger Encyclopedia and will look him up when I get a chance. The information you provide, incidentally, jives with the piece I plan to post today (April 23, 2015). That piece talks in passing about Ford snitching to the FBI on fellow recalcitrant commissioners. The courageous Hale Boggs must have been one of them!

  2. Thanks Emma for clarifying the key point about statistical aggregates. Conceptually, that is the hardest point to grasp,–that I’m not talking about Frank Church or FDR. They might or might not have been murdered. But there is no way under heaven that the PATTERN of assassinations and incarcerations can be explained without assuming foul play. In the land of the bankers, friends of the people are routinely assassinated.

  3. I always assumed terms like “Invisible Government” etc., were coined by websites like VT (if you don’t mind me saying). But was I surprised to read in a book I currently going through…
    “I have tried, in these chapters, to explain the place of propaganda in modern American life and something of the methods by which it operates – to tell the why, the what, the who and the how of the invisible government which dictates our thoughts, directs our feelings and controls our actions.”
    Propaganda, by Edward L. Bernays – 1928
    and the book available in pdf format if you enter the above information in to your favourite search engine. Read the words of wisdom from the man who brought us Women’s Liberation… and America’s participation in WW1. He might have had training at the Tavistock Institute as a bonus.

    • An even better book explaining how the propaganda system works–and far more intelligent and far-reaching than Bernays–is Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World Revisited.

  4. I wear a tin hat too, wearily but with no regrets. Incidentally, the CIA invented the very idiotic, ahistorical, term “conspiracy theory.” And what is even more depressing is that most people cannot see through such an obvious oxymoron.

  5. Thanks for a very thoughtful comment. I am glad you made it, giving me a chance to explain one key point of the article.

    One point of the article is not that they killed Church or Lewonstein. I can’t be sure about any single person. The point rather is that we have a pattern, just as in the case of tobacco, or asbestos, or roundup. Now, if Jenny, a smoker, dies of lung cancer at age 42, I can’t be sure that smoking killed her. But I can be positive that smoking killed, or will kill, many smokers. The same logic applies here: Standing up to the bankers is far more hazardous to one’s health than smoking cigarettes. Maybe Church died of natural causes, but that is not the point. The point is that the bankers murder almost anyone who stands in their way. This conclusion is incontestable: Hyenas prey on antelopes and the bankers prey on us!

  6. Yes, of course Wilson was their man. He dragged us to war to serve the bankers, signed the Fed into existence, did not veto the needless and oppressive income tax, burned Lindbergh’s book, arrested Eugene Debs, killed union members, was an awful racist–and I’m just getting started. But towards the end, after the bankers deliberately planted the seeds of the next war, he must have had a change of heart, and said so. And he could be a most dangerous enemy, for unlike, say, our last two white house fools, he had a brain. Kennedy also started as a playboy (that’s why they elected him), but woke up while in office. The bankers had every reason to kill both.

    I certainly agree with your pessimism. We cannot possibly wait for the majority to wake up. If anything gets done, it will be done by the comparatively few of us who are aware and who care.

  7. Excellent article! While I appreciate Dr. James suggestion of a vigorous approach, I question whether it would really root out the problem. The problem is that some people simply love money; and that love of money draws them swiftly to banks and finance. While we might eliminate one generation of bankers, the next generation would produce more. Whatever rules and laws were put in place would be worked around by attorneys; so next we would need to eliminate attorneys who are supported by business men and so on and on. My suggestion would be to start by picking out one powerful and almost secret bank. The Bank Of International Settlements (BIS) and study its membership–central bankers. We would give these persons plenty of attention and find out what makes them tick. And exactly what they do. By shinning a bright light on these money lovers much would be learned; and because they thrive in darkness we might interfere with their activities. Worth a try.

    • “Between 1933 and 1945 the BIS board of directors included Walther Funk, a prominent Nazi official, and Emil Puhl, as well as Hermann Schmitz, the director of IG Farben and Baron von Schroeder, the owner of the J.H. Stein Bank.” I am sure the bank has found other suitable men for membership in the years since. We need to read Nazi not as something peculiarly German but rather as a term well suited to describe many individuals of whom we hear daily and whom are regularly lauded for their public service. etc.

    • Nice idea and thanks for a thoughtful comment. But I’m with Preston. Nothing, will work now, I’m convinced, except a revolution. It’s no longer merely a question of freedom, but also justice, peace, and our very survival. These psychopaths are unaware, or simply do not care, that they are destroying the planet.
      Elsewhere I outlined what I feel is the only political framework that can bypass the problems you mention: http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/07/seven-billion-cheers-for-direct-democracy/

      And also, the only way to unseat the bankers: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06/17/the-al-sabbah-brigade/

    • To LC: Wonderful comment, thanks. I entirely agree. I haven’t voted for over 20 years. The only thing voting does is legitimizing the system. Voting, I say, at present, is not only misinformed, but counterproductive. My next installments would have a great deal more to say about this.

      I used to believe in peaceful revolution, but no more. Why? Simple: When anything like that happens, the bankers kill the leaders and destroy the movement. They were talking about killing the Occupy leaders, and these leaders were, comparatively, small change. They destroyed real unions, the Black Panthers, often through murders. And look at what happened to Eugene Debs, MLK, Gandhi (I studied Gandhi’s touching case carefully, and he posed the greatest imaginable threat to them–so the Rothschilds, through their stooges in the UK government–almost certainly had him killed). No, civil disobedience and pacifism do not work with psychopaths. These conscience-less men understand one, and only one, language: direct threats to their own lives and well-being.

  8. Moti, the “deathbed confession” of CIA officer who claimed to have killed Marilyn Monroe, is a FAKE news story. (She was murdered, but that’s not the issue. The issue is this specific article and the source, which is a “satire” site, although they aren’t funny.) The website’s disclaimer page says this: “WNDR assumes however all responsibility for the satirical nature of its articles and for the fictional nature of their content. All characters appearing in the articles in this website – even those based on real people – are entirely fictional and any resemblance between them and any persons, living, dead, or undead is purely a miracle.”

  9. Another outstanding article. And yes any foreign Khazarian Mafia Banker evil enough to defraud Americans by charging them pernicious usury to use the money that should have been their in the first place is evil beyond words. These subhumans steal the food out of babies’ mouths and blow them to bits with their engineered wars and aerial attacks using hijacked the USG and military. And yet none have been dealt with in like form. The global financial reset is coming and you can bet that all these big shots will become hunted game and disposable because there will be a new Worldwide populism that will want them destroyed for what they have done to us all.

    • I wish I could share that optimism Preston. They are organized, they have constructed numerous pillars (more soon), they can print money at will, and they have a plan. They have been winning for centuries. I hope and pray that you are right, but personally I’m inclined to pessimism. Unless we organize, forget our minor differences which the bankers capitalize on and foster (Muslim, Jew, atheist, gay, Russian, American, Mexican), choose a viable strategy, and risk our lives again for freedom and survival, they will win, I’m afraid.

  10. Great stuff. Not sure that Morrison and Marley were actually murdered, but really, who cares, your
    overall thesis is correct. Speaking of musicians, why did Seeger live undisturbed while Phil
    Ochs received “the treatment.” Seeger wrote “If I Had A Hammer.” Ochs wrote “I Ain’t Marching
    Anymore” and “Draft Dodger Rag.” There is a difference.

    As far as Lennon goes, I have heard that he was quietly funding JFK research. Might have had something to do with things.

    As far as induced cancers: Oswald’s girlfriend was working on developing more virulent cancers for
    the CIA, at least according to her (pretty sure she said it was for the CIA). So she was helping the CIA
    etc. covertly assassinate leaders; meanwhile her boyfriend (or ex-bf) was used as a patsy in the
    assassination of a President. Interesting sometimes how these things intertwine.

    • Morrison was murdered in a Mafia-run joint, and then his body was moved. I don’t know about Marley. Jimi Hendrix drowned in red wine. How does that happen? Waterboarding torture with red wine? Or somebody pushed his head into a sink full of wine and held it there?

    • Thanks! I am not sure either about any one person like Morrison or Marley or Wilson. I read about both, and there is strong evidence that they were murdered. But the point, as you mentioned, is not these 3 particular cases. The point is the pattern. And this is undeniable. So whenever any troublesome person (to the bankers) dies, they are the prime suspects. More: the pattern doesn’t prove individual cases, but it does prove that most of these persons were murdered. No other explanation is rationally possible.

      Wonderful point about Ochs/Seeger. For me the litmus test of a contemporary dissident involves the question: What does that person have to say about 9/11 and the JFK assassination?

  11. The bankers or Jews to be clear would be nothing without their talmudic ideology which many Jews support not only in thought but in action. I get so tired of ppl copping a pleas on this not to name the source. Not only does that ideology in compass massive Jewish support but it would be nothing in a country where Jews make up 5% of the population without major bought off or black mailed goyim support. Now ask your self, if the bankers aren’t massively Jewish, why does Israel get special treatment? Why did the bolsheviks outlaw anti-semitism and the bolsheviks were enabled by Jewish bankers. Why did they leave synagogues alone and trash churches-why the Jewish exception always and everywhere if TPTB aren’t Jewish? Why do Masons come knocking on John deNugent’s door when he is running for mayor and say “Lay off the Jews!”
    The fact that 95% of the population is scared to name our Jewish tyrants is why we have Jewish tyrants, [email protected]

  12. Maybe I am naive, extra sensitive, whatever…but I can’t imagine how a person willingly becomes a “hit-man”. You could offer me $10 million dollars to kill a person I’ve never met and I wouldn’t do it, would not even be tempted a bit. So, it baffles me how easy it seems to be to find men who will kill an innocent person at the drop of a hat. How could someone be able to do that for a living? Even if they told the hit-man the person was a threat to the USA, you’d think they would be smart enough to realize, for example, that Marilyn Monroe doesn’t deserve to be murdered. I don’t care what she knew, her public image was that of a “ditzy blonde” so the public wouldn’t have taken her ramblings seriously, anyway. Sad commentary on the human race indeed.

    • @wjabbe:Draft!!!Also,if they didn’t listen to us viet nam vets ,what can be said?They’re on their own. ( google.com/search?q=vietnam+veterans+against+war+1990%27s&biw=1280&bih=559&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=p0gxVYjEEoPnoATPt4GgBg&ved=0CDAQsAQ )

    • Thanks Mary. You are not naive, you are a normal, decent human being. It’s hard for us to imagine that there are monsters walking among us. It took me a very long time to accept that awful conclusion. History shows that they exist: Read for instance about Caligula, or about the guy in Wisconsin who allegedly killed his victims and then ate them. Something like that. Think of the men who lied their way to Iraq, and then proceeded, deliberately, with a genocide. Read David Stannard, American Holocaust. So, we must not look at the person in the mirror and think that a Cheney, or a Netanyahu, or a Rockefeller are like us. They are not. And, psychological research shows, they are a very small minority, something like 5%. Most soldiers, for instance, don’t even shoot others at war. Once we realize that, the question becomes: How do we remove these psychopaths from power and achieve our potential?

    • Excellent point “wjabbe.” If I manage to complete this series, that will be one of the topics I’ll try to look at: Why do people act against their best interests and convictions?

  13. “We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past centuries.”
    David Rockefeller, speech to Trilateral Commission – which he founded – June 1991.
    The “Pillars of American Democracy” hate democracy with unrivaled passion.

  14. Another great piece by Moti Nissani … the devastating truth we wish more people knew and understood. But one can see the blatant Google & search engine censorship sometimes, pushing Veterans Today off search page 1 and quite down the list for some topics … despite the huge amount of ultra-relevant, unique material on VT.

    One small correction to the above … US President Woodrow Wilson was indeed ‘hit’ while in office, suffering a cerebral haemorrhage on 25 September 1919, but Wilson finished his term as a half-functional invalid and did not die until a few years after leaving office, in 1924.

    • I agree about VT. Most “alternative” sites have been co-opted long ago, as have been most prominent, semi-official, “dissidents.” For me, as I’ve said, there are several criteria I use to distinguish truthful sites from co-opted one. Do they laugh out of court the gradual deterioration of the biosphere? 9/11 truth seekers? JFK truth seekers?

      I can’t thank you enough for the Wilson correction! You are absolutely right, and I’ll try to correct it as soon as I can!

  15. This is a very interesting analysis, and well worth pursing further, but alot of seemingly lower level bankers have committed suicide in the last two years maybe to ensure the safety of their families and to protect those at the top.

    I look on the intelligence services of nations like Israel, France and the United States, who target and kill people, as the hit men for what are essentially street gangs with huge budgets. The have always used disposable people from organized crime to do their dirty work. That is what ISIS is.

    The OSS, later to become the CIA, went off the rails the moment it was born by hooking up with Italian organized crime to undermine Benito Mussolini who had quashed the Mafia and nothing has changed since then.

Comments are closed.