Steven Spielberg and Natalie Portman on Anti-Setimitism…Lovely! (Part I)

“Harvey Weinstein, my brother from another mother, said a few weeks ago that we need to ‘kick the anti-Semites in the ass.’ I think he is right.”

…by Jonas E. Alexis


The Zionist regime has really gone mad over the past few weeks and months. Certainly the movement has received a low blow precisely because several of its representatives have been none other than sluts, whores, liars, hoaxers, and even deceivers.

For months, the regime has been moaning and lamenting that “anti-Semitism” is on the rise and that it has nothing to do with Jewish behavior,[1] a risible thesis which we have refuted over and over. Here is how Steven Spielberg put the issue last January:

“If you are a Jew today, in fact if you are any person who believes in the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom in free expression, you know that like many other groups, we are once again facing the perennial demons of intolerance.”[2]

In his presentation, Spielberg is basically regurgitating two things: 1) “Anti-Semitism” is on the rise and 2) it has nothing to do with Jewish behavior. As Daniel Jonah Goldhagen would have put it, this form of “anti-Semitism” is the Devil that never dies.[3] On the contrary, Spielberg argues, people do not like Jews because they do not like “freedom of speech” and “freedom of expression.”

Although this thesis has been propounded ad nauseam in much of the Western World, most specifically in the Holocaust establishment, it has no moral and intellectual basis whatsoever. If we were to use that thesis as an experiment in a social study, that would be one of the first theses to be considered—and it would be one of the first to be rejected, because it is so inadequate and ultimately worthless. If Spielberg thinks that the thesis is still legitimate, then he has to put his thinking cap on for a while and explain the following phenomena.

Can Spielberg really explain to us why David Irving has been in jail numerous times for questioning key aspects of the “Holocaust”? Can he tell us why Norman Finkelstein was fired from DePaul University?

denis rancourt
If you want to live peacefully and love your career, don’t talk about the Israel Lobby or the killings of Palestinian men, women and children.

Can Spielberg pick up the phone and call Denis Rancourt—a stellar physicist at the University of Ottawa and a scholar who has published more than 100 technical articles in peer reviewed scientific journals—and ask him why he was fired after teaching for more than twenty years? Did that have something to do with what Jewish writer J. J. Goldberg would have called “Jewish Power”[4] at the University of Ottawa? Let us hear from Rancourt himself:

“The Israel Lobby has the role of chief-whip for the US military-economic-finance empire; Empire, for short. That is, the Lobby ensures doctrinal discipline among Western, that is, US-aligned politicians, intellectuals, and the media, regarding the Empire’s Middle East policy. I mean ‘intellectual’ in the broad sense of any professional who has influence, and ‘media’ in the broad sense of anyone who communicates to others.

“The Empire’s main geopolitical focus presently is the Middle East, where the Empire is dedicated to actively and continuously prevent liberation and coalescence of Arab nations, so as to keep control of the territory and the energy resources. To achieve this, the Empire’s main policy in the Middle East is Israel, which is charged with continual war and sabotage against all Middle Eastern entities that would vie for independence from the Empire.

“Thus, the Empire, via Israel, is embarked on a vicious and murderous project without an end in the Middle East, and this unsavory project must be sold to the Empire’s home populations, including both managers and ordinary citizens. That is the role of the Israel Lobby; to sell Israel and the continuous and deliberate carnage as acceptable and unavoidable.

“That is why the Israel Lobby is actively engaged is creating Islamophobia, in exaggerating anti-Semitism, in constructing Nazi-holocaust remembrance, in suppressing academic freedom, in suppressing freedom of the press, in ‘finding’ and pursuing alleged ‘terrorists,’ in developing anti-speech [or] ‘anti-hate’ laws, in promoting cultural ties with Israel, in attacking Muslim associations, and so on.

“As such, the work of the Israel Lobby includes hundreds of ongoing campaigns to intimidate, discipline, fire, and vilify academics who dare to be critical of Israel or of US Middle East policy. The list of shut-out and targeted academics is a long one and includes the well-known cases of Joel Kovel, Ward Churchill, Norman Finkelstein, James Petras, Terri Ginsberg, William Robinson, David F. Noble, Steven Salaita, Iymen Chehade, and many others. The more an academic is threatening to the Lobby, the more aggressively that academic is attacked.

“My own case is also an example. I was a tenured Full Professor of physics at the University of Ottawa in Canada’s capital city. I am an internationally recognized researcher and I taught in both the Faculty of Science and the Faculty of Arts. I was publicly critical of the university president’s paid trip to Israel.

“I invited Palestinian speakers into my classrooms to talk about Gaza, and geopolitical analysts who were critical of Israel. These moves led to condemnation of me in the Zionist mainstream media, and to discipline, which was overturned.

“In 2008, a new university president – Allan Rock – who is a staunch and unconditional supporter of Israel and who had been Canada’s Zionist ambassador to the UN, became immediately motivated to fire me, tenure or not, and irrespective of my popular courses and my large science research funding.

“With the help of an entire team using specially-hired union-busting lawyers, after contriving for years including intensive covert surveillance of me using a hired-student spy to monitor my every spoken and written word and my every activity on campus and at other university campuses, the university finally settled on the false pretext for dismissal of alleging that I had improperly assigned high grades to all 23 students in an advanced physics course.

“They needed a ‘clean’ pretext that they hoped would be supported by public opinion and that would not bring out all of their dirt. When public opinion and some mainstream media sided with me instead, a high-profile Zionist columnist at the New York Times suddenly wrote not-one but two articles to discredit me, and was invited to Canada to falsely defame me, regarding my teaching, on a trend-setting Canadian TV talk show whose producers are Zionists.”

This “high-profile Zionist columnist at the New York Times” was none other than Stanley Fish,[5] a professor of English literature at the University of Illinois. Fish has been a thought police since time immemorial. E. Michael Jones for example took one of Fish’s courses as a graduate student during the 1970s and things did not go well at all.

Let us just say in passing that Fish pretends to promote free speech in his writings and public appearances, but you are not allowed to criticize or demolish Fish’s arguments in his classroom, particularly when you logically show that those arguments are firmly planted in mid-air. Jones writes:

“After one class in which I tried to explain the similarities between Fish’s theories and those critics we had just demolished, a change came over the classroom. Not only wasn’t I brilliant anymore [Fish previously told Jones that he was ‘brilliant’], but I found that I could not get recognized to ask questions anymore. The discussion, what little there was, had to get along without me. One day after holding my arm up in the air for what seemed like hours, Fish finally called me, but prefaced his remarks by saying, ‘Mr. Jones, you’ve wasted enough of this class’ time; now, what is it?’

“I found myself remembering this incident while reading an article in a recent issue of Newsweek on ‘Thought Police on Campus.’ there right in the middle of the discussion was a picture of a now-wizened Stanley Fish telling the Newsweek reporter that ‘Disagreement can be fun.’ That’s not the way I remember it. It was not fun to disagree with Stanley Fish, at least not when you were a student in his class.”[6]

In any event, will Spielberg protect Rancourt’s free speech? Will he help Rancourt get his job back? Rancourt told me a few months ago that he was “struggling with this essential funding campaign for my appeal in the defamation case that was funded by the university.”[7] Will Steven Spielberg, whose “personal net worth is estimated to be $3.6 billion,” send a check to Rancourt and help his cause?

To pursue this study further, can Spielberg explain to us why Ernst Zundel’s house was burned down by members of the Dreadful Few? Can he come up with a rational explanation as to why Nicholas Kollerstrom, a noted historian of science who has written several entries for the Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers, was fired from the University College of London?

If Spielberg did not know any of those facts, then he needs to take a long vacation from Hollywood and visit his local library, talk to people who have been stigmatized by organized Jewry (most specifically Jewish people like Norman Finkelstein), and provide a reasoned response to some of their concerns. That would help him a great deal and would almost certainly move the debate forward.

Spielberg is confronted with multiple difficulties here. In order for him to balance his Zionist equation, he has to exclude the actual facts and other interesting phenomena, such as the concentration camp in Gaza.[8] He has to specifically dismiss the fact that “Bedouin families east of Jerusalem face forced evacuation.”[9] The Associated Press has recently declared,

“It was a large house with three floors and freshly painted pale blue shutters that had just been built for a family of 17. But within a few hours of work by a pair of Israeli bulldozers, all that was left was a mountain of rubble and twisted metal.”

In addition, Spielberg has to ignore the testimonies of at least 60 Israeli soldiers who said that they were indiscriminately killing civilians.[10] Listen to an Israeli official after Hamas won the Palestinian elections: The idea is to put the Palestinians on a diet, but not to make them die of hunger.

Spielberg has to deny that U.S. troops, which are under the auspices of the Neo-Bolsheviks, have and are still “operating openly in Ukraine.”[11] He has to deny that the Ukraine crisis, as John J. Mearsheimer of the University Chicago put it last year, is “the West’s fault.”[12] (From our perspective, it is the Neo-Bolsheviks’ fault.)

Spielberg has to deny that at least 25,962 innocent civilians have lost their lives from 2008 to 2013 in the Middle East.[13] Spielberg has to deny that “an estimated 26,000 rapes and sexual assaults took place in the military in 2012” alone.[14]


As it turns out, people like Spielberg have indirectly ruined the Zionist project. We have already argued that Mila Kunis, Pamela Geller, and Michael Douglas did not help the Zionist cause by pulling out the anti-Semitism card out of the Zionist hat. Now Natalie Portman’s turn.

“Israeli-born actress Natalie Portman says she feels nervous as a Jew living in France, where she moved last year, two months before the Charlie Hebdo attacks.”

Once again, has that woman visited Gaza? Why doesn’t she take a vacation there and see what it looks like?[15] Doesn’t Portman have a psychology degree from Harvard? Doesn’t she have to look at the actual evidence before she can make a conclusion?

Oh, my apologies. Portman rapped that she cheated on every test while at Harvard. (Whether she is being serious I cannot tell. But there could be some truth in this. She was still working as an actress while studying psychology. She was also Alan Dershowitz’s research assistant, the guy who got caught plagiarizing.[16]):

As we saw in a previous article, as an actress Portman could not give credit where credit was due. In short, her fruit does not allow us to take her seriously at all.

[1] For a recent development, see for example “Anti-Semitism rising again, Jewish leader warns 70 years after death camp’s liberation,” Jerusalem Post, April 26, 2015; “Spielberg says Jews still face anti-Semitism 70 years after Holocaust,”Jerusalem Post, January 27, 2015.

[2] “Spielberg says Jews still face anti-Semitism 70 years after Holocaust,” Jerusalem Post, January 27, 2015.

[3] Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, The Devil That Never Dies: The Rise and Threat of Global Anti-Semitism (New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2013).

[4] J. J. Goldberg, Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment (New York: Perseus Books, 1996).

[5] Stanley Fish, “Are Academic Different?,” NY Times, February 15, 2009. In that particular article, Fish evaded the real issue and concentrated on non-essential matters.

[6] E. Michael Jones, Degenerate Moderns: Modernity as Rationalized Sexual Misbehavior (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2012), 76.

[7] If you can help, please do so here: You can contact Professor Rancourt personally at [email protected]

[8] See for example “Israel forced to release study on Gaza blockade,” BBC, October 17, 2012; Jonathan Cook, “The starvation diet for Gaza shows the blockade will fall,” The National, October 24, 2012; “Israel used ‘calorie count’ to limit Gaza food during blockade, critics claim,” Guardian, October 17, 2012; Conal Urquhart, “Gaza on brink of implosion as aid cut-off starts to bite,” Guardian, April 16, 2006; for similar studies, see Neve Gordon, Israel’s Occupation (Berkley: University of California Press, 2008).

[9] “Bedouin families east of Jerusalem face forced evacuation,” Ma’an News Agency, May 9, 2015.

[10] “Israeli soldier testimonies reveal ‘shoot to kill’ policy in Gaza war,” Ma’an News Agency, May 4, 2015.

[11] Patrick L. Smith, “The New York Times does its government’s bidding: Here’s what you’re not being told about U.S. troops in Ukraine,” Salon, May 7, 2015.

[12] John J. Mearsheimer, “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault,” Foreign Affairs, September/October 2014.

[13] Dan Murphy, “Iraq Violence More Than Doubles in 2013: Is Country Headed Off the Cliff?,” Christian Science Monitor, December 20, 2013.

[14] Mary F. Calvert, “Photos: Women Who Risked Everything to Expose Sexual Assault in the Military,” Mother Jones, September 8, 2014; for similar reports, see also Adam Sewer, “Sexual Assaults in Military Keep Rising—And Nearly 90 Percent Never Report It,” Mother Jones, May 8, 2013.

[15] In 2002, Portman wrote a sophomoric letter to the Harvard Crimson pretending to be sympathize for the Palestinians. Natalie Portman, “Israeli Diversity Shown Even Among Leaders,” Harvard Crimson, April 17, 2002. I will not attempt to respond to the letter here, since I have other fish to fry.

[16] See for example Norman Finkelstein, Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History (Berkley: University of California Press, 2008).

All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. Spielberg is being completely dishonest when he talks about freedom of speech and expression as he never mentions holocaust revisionists being imprisoned in Europe. In fact I would call him a pathological liar. Look here – After watching these documentaries a child can tell the Hollywood version of the holocaust is full of holes.

  2. “We must fill our psychiatric hospitals with anti-semitic crazy people and our prisons with anti-semitic criminals. We must hunt anti-semitics and all the way to the limits of the law and after that destroy them. We must humiliate our anti-semitics and torture them until they become our fellow travelers…” (Rabbi Leon Spitz, American Hebrew, 01.03.1946)

  3. They hate us for our freedom of speech, of expression. Sounds like what we were repeatedly told after 9-11-01 .This is tantamount to an admission of their involvement. Since it’s only their speech and expression is all they want protected as ours is anti semitic. Yet as you Jonas come to us with irrefutable proof that the dreadful few should be the ones kicked in the ass and often.

  4. thank you for another truth-filled article..what you write is so obvious to so many, I am so thank full such truthful articles still can be published. 3.4 billion, ..that is their reward for ignoring the truth and never acknowledging Gaza, and all the other atrocities done to humanity..well, mr.spielberg, maybe your billions and the other money-infested fools in the industry can buy yourselves new souls, for the day will be here where all your money will not help you, unless of course aligning yourselves with evil is what you consider your final award..

    The Blogs > Josh Bornstein
    Understanding the Idea of Israeli Land Under Talmudic Law
    The only use that “Palestinians” could possibly serve would be as test material for medical experiments. Normally, we wouldn’t be able to conduct medical tests on humans if those tests cause significant pain. But, since “Palestinians” aren’t humans, we can cause as much pain as we want to them. We can inject “Palestinian” children with unstable chemicals, we can chop open pregnant “Palestinian” women, we can strip the flesh off of “Palestinian” babies – we can do whatever we want to these worthless subhuman vermin. And, by conducting medical experiments on “Palestinians,” we can obtain medical knowledge that will ultimately be useful in providing medical assistance for Jews. Not only that, but it would also be a lot of fun to do. Could there be anything more satisfying than the helpless screams of a “Palestinian” child as it’s torn apart by Jewish doctors? I certainly can’t imagine anything more enjoyable. The Talmud (in Yebamoth 98a) clearly says: “All gentile children are animals.” Under Talmudic law, “Palestinian” children are not human. They are subhuman beasts and we are thus free to rape them, torture them, and kill them as we please.

    • ughh…
      this article left me (almost) without words, this bornstein. if he is really not joking, reading the article i was hoping, then… …he left no uncertainity at the end.

      after reading it could seem that my wife is human and i am just one of the cattle. although people do tend to love their animals…
      (ok this was a joke or tried to be sarcastic at least. it is always fun to explain one, hahaha)

      thanks for the link Amarka, useful one

      p.s.: Jonas! great work! keep it up! God bless you!

  6. “…Will Steven Spielberg, whose “personal net worth is estimated to be $3.6 billion,” send a check to Rancourt and help his cause?”

    Spielberg once stated that, if war were to break out between the US and Israel, then he would move to Israel and fight on the Israeli side.

    Never mind that it was in the US that he had the opportunity to ply his trade, and to become fabulously wealthy doing so. Loyalty to The Tribe trumps everything else.

    I mention that incident only because I am a dirty evil anti-Semite, right?

    • Spielberg would not have to move to anywhere since the USA is a de facto territory of the duopoly composed of the zionist sovereignty of the City of London and Israel .

  7. Mr. Alexis,
     1st of all it’s sad to read what you have to go thru with Israeli-American Zionists in Your Own Country
     We hope you have “Peace & Happiness & following Your Dreams” in South Korea.
     Israel Self-Destructive Bomb is Ticking Faster now than ever before, with their “New Government”!
     My Korean Neighbors are very nice to me, since they know that I have lost 2 uncles in the “Korean War”
     The Operative Words are ( fact if you are Any Person..) Translation it includes You Too (Cockroaches)
     That is why the Zionists Silence the freedom of speech & freedom of expression of the World Historians
    and Scientists when they “Investigate about the Holocaust,” or the Zionists Ethnic Cleansing of
     “Anti-Semitism”? Which SEMITES is Spielberg talking about? The Zionists’ Propaganda Goes, On & On
     Who are the Semites (lighter Skin, but Not-White) or Hemites (Darker-Skin)?
    People with SEMITES ETHNICITY ___ Originated from the Arabian Peninsula, North Africa & The Horn
    of Africa __ Ethiopians (Flashans), including the Arabs, Hebrews, Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians,
    Arameans, Babylonians, Carthaginians, Southeastern, Southwestern Asia, & Beyond.
     SEMITIC LANGUAGE? Arabic, Hebrew, Akkadians, Canaanites, Mandaeans, Syriacs-Arameans,
    Samaritans and Assyrians.

  8. It is enjoyable to watch the video here where you can see Finkelstein take Dershowitz apart for Dershowitz’s plagiarism.

  9. Excellent article.
    Norman Finkelstein is Brooklyn, NY native and his mother had been in a concentration camp in WW2. She could tell that so many phonies were out to get compensation and sympathy for being supposed Holocaust victims. Many were never in concentration camps.
    Finkelstein was first ousted from Hunter University in NY City where he had taught for many years. He was then picked up by DePaul University who knew about how the Zionist power structure dismissed Finkelstein for speaking out about the Holocaust industry. I do not know what it was that gave DePaul cold feet and thus let Finkelstein go.

  10. Denis Rancourt suggests Israel and the Jewish Lobby are mere instrumentalities of the (military-economic-financial) Empire, which is absurd considering that Jews control the US gov without a trace of meaningful opposition; control the economy through WS and their tribal fiefdom at the Fed; control virtually all public discourse through their ownership of the media; control the Pentagon through their neocon think tanks, etc, etc. Also, and considering US backing of Israel during the Yom Kippur War in ’73 caused the price of oil to quadruple within months, the idea that today our oil needs can best be secured for the long term by making continuous war on our suppliers in the ME–and that’s why we need Israel as our vassal state–is nonsense. As for the likes of Spielberg, these people are never dealing in good faith, they’re the greatest mass murderers in all of human history, and answering them is simply playing into their hands–unless of course, you think they’ll give you a voice and fair hearing in the MSM, or in the halls of gov they control to an extent a zoo keeper could only dream of.

  11. It doesn’t matter who’s getting slammed there’s always a Zionist to throw him OR herself in front of the bullet to cry anti-semitism. Lying about history to be a martyr. The last ones to cry before the curtain gets pulled will take the heat for all. Including Steven, Saving Private Zion, Spielberg, on of the biggest liars for Zion.
    Natalie is an obvious ‘Hollywood Tools for Zion’ union member and we can expect no different from her.

  12. Thank you very much Alexis, for this precise description – including the systematic outing and social destroying of Denis Rancourt’s career – they “never” forget.

    You described his case precisely aand while reading, my own past came back to life before my own eyes. The same tactics, the same at maximum average intelligent persons, put in higher places of education to tell people and collegs, what to do and what is to be teached.

    At the deep heart, they are jellous about anyone who might be much more intelligent, much more productive and well minded to the pupils. They can’t stand it, if you easily outperform them and then they try to set you up in one way or another. My whole career is full of such intrigues, including accusations of lawers …. and tries against me in court. They didn’t succeeed. These cases I always won, what I couldn’t fight in the end was the total de-solidarization of most, not all, collegues which turned their backs on me (and others), because they were frightened or had simply career dreams. This is the way, the education is corrupted fom the top by placing dump people, willing to fight for their position in front of others. The do everything, especially the long time dumbling down of the young people.

    This article talks about a very central part of that “mind war” and how it is done. May be this is at the heart of the “Peter principle.”

  13. Addenda,

    Spielberg is famous for making a film about white sharks called “Jaws!”

    Rumour has it that he has just made a film about loan sharks and he will call it “Jews.”

  14. Spielberg is the guy who tatoos Christian symbols on his Russian Jewish Mafia figures just to keep the goy boys confused about who the bad guy really are.

    He recently appeared in TV saying he put his hands in the water at Aushwitz, on the advice of a rabbi, and they came up covered in bone dust , from the ovens 75 years ago. If true, you can be sure the water was first seeded with a bag of bone meal fertilizer and a DNA test would should you if it was a Hereford or a Holstein.

    Funny thing. Yesterday I saw a TV interview with a nice old Jew who met Dr Mengele at Auswitz when he was a boy and when the interviewer asked him what Mengele did to him he said, “he gave me a candy.”

Comments are closed.