Schools in France Want Muslim Students to Dress Like Sluts and Whores



Two Muslim students at the Birmingham Metropolitan College campus in Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands. The college have banned Muslim girls from wearing a veil. Picture by Damien McFadden/Daily Mail : 07968 308252.
Two Muslim students at the Birmingham Metropolitan College campus in Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands. The college has banned Muslim girls from wearing a veil.
Picture by Damien McFadden/Daily Mail : 07968 308252.

…by Jonas E. Alexis


Long before the birth of Western Civilization, a Greek dramatist by the name of Euripides discovered a metaphysical and universal principle, and it has been used by ideologues in almost every century. Euripides argued in The Bacchae that you can destroy a culture and indeed an entire society through sexual subversion and destruction of the moral order.

If you think that Euripides is wrong, then pick up the writings and biographies of people like Aleister Crowley, Sigmund Freud, Wilhelm Reich and Alfred Kinsey. You will soon discover that those people harnessed that sexual corruption and unleashed it upon much of the West, most specifically England and America.[1] Jewish writer Elizabeth Wurtzel calls this sexual corruption “pussy power.”

The question, then, is simply this: How does this “pussy power” work?


When women take off their skirts and get naked and start “dancing on the mountainside,” as Euripides would have put it, or start twerking on stage (like Lady Gaga, Miley Cyrus, Beyonce, Rihanna, etc.), then you can be sure that the moral law, which is ingrained in the human heart, is being subdued by a powerful force. The supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei knew about this power. He said that

“If they [the Zionist regime in America] arouse sexual desires in any given country, if they spread unrestrained mixing of men and women, and if they lead youth to behavior to which they are naturally inclined by instincts, there will no longer be any need for artillery and guns against that nation.”

If you think that the supreme leader is out of touch with reality, let us bring in Benjamin Netanyahu himself. He said:

“If you want to advance regime change in Iran, you don’t have to go through the C.I.A. cloak-and-dagger stuff — what you want to do is take very large, very strong transponders and just beam ‘Melrose Place’ and ‘Beverly Hills 2050’ and all that into Tehran and into Iran, because that is subversive stuff. They watch it — the young kids watch it, the young people. They want to have the same nice clothes and the same houses and swimming pools and so on.”[2]

You see, Netanyahu is not that stupid here. He knows that this “subversive stuff” can destroy lives—and he has enough evidence to justify the theory. He knows that Samson, one of Israel’s undefeatable heroes, was eventually defeated through this “subversive stuff.”

“Samson and Delilah is a good place to start. Israel was invincible military…so the Philistines decided to get the Israelite leader by other than military means. They seduced him sexually. Once Samson succumbed to Delilah’s wiles, he lost his power, and Israel lost its leader. He was no longer on the field of battle, but rather, to use Milton’s phrase, ‘eyeless in Gaza, grinding at the mill with slaves.’”[3]

In 2002, the Israeli military forces did something very similar in Gaza. When they took over Palestinian TV stations in Ramallah in the West Bank, they immediately shut down all other TV stations and started broadcasting pornography. E. Michael Jones writes,

“The story of the Palestinian TV stations has a curiously Biblical ring. The Israelis turned the tables. They knew a blind opponent is no opponent. They knew, as did the ancient Greeks, that lust makes a man blind. St. Thomas Aquinas said lust ‘darkens the mind.’ Suddenly, Israel’s use of pornography against the Palestinians isn’t so obscure.

“Pornography is a weapon ‘Jews with an atavistic fear of Christian authority’ [he is quoting Nathan Abrams here] have used to weaken the dominant culture and, therefore, assure that Jews, always a minority, are unmolested by their ‘Christian’ neighbors. They are well-versed in the military use of pornography.

“The corrosive effects of Wilhelm Reich’s philosophy of control through sexual demoralization are still with us, promoted by Jews as a form of political control to weaken the power of the non-Jewish majority. The Israelis broadcast pornography over Palestinian TV stations, says one report, ‘to keep Palestinian youths away from joining the resistance against Israeli occupation and apartheid.’

“According to the Palestinian intelligence officer, the CIA discussed the issue with the Israelis repeatedly, but ‘the idea first came from the Israeli side who suggested that only these things could take Palestinian youths away from their hostile fixation on Israel…

“Pornography weakens the majority culture by moral subversion. Jews often lead in the application of new technology. That meant using high resolution photography, the VCR, and the Internet to deliver pornography just as it meant dynamite, forgery, and smuggling to bring down the Czar in Russia.

“English professor Jay Gertzman, whose father and uncle were arrested on obscenity charges in Philadelphia in the ‘50s, writes about the influence of Jews in the sex book trade in Bookleggers and Smuthounds: The Trade in Erotica 1920-1940:

“‘While few Jews are radical, many radicals (and pornographers) are Jews. Writes non-Jew Ernest van den Haag in The Jewish Mystique, ‘Out of one hundred Jews, five may be radicals, but out of then radicals, five are likely to be Jewish.’”[4]

The central issue here is that Netanyahu’s “subversive stuff” is powerful, and the current regime knows it. This is one reason why they start producing this “subversive stuff” in places like Germany even to first-graders! Listen to the German newspaper Spiegel:

“When it comes to sex, Germans are not known for being squeamish. Yet a sex-education book that has been circulating in Berlin elementary schools has some parents up in arms.

The book, ‘Where Do You Come From?’ (‘Wo kommst du her?’), which is recommended for ages 5 and up, shows a couple, Lisa and Lars, in various stages of arousal. In one illustration, Lisa puts a condom on Lars’ erect penis. Another shows them having intercourse. The text also veers toward the explicit.

“‘When it’s so good that it can’t get any better, Lisa and Lars have an orgasm,’ it reads. And, finally: ‘The vagina and penis feel nice and tingly and warm.’

“The book was shown to first-graders at an elementary school in the Berlin neighborhood of Kreuzberg. Parents began to complain about the racy content, but the school did nothing — until it was reported in the local press and the Berlin Senate, the city-state’s administrative body, began receiving complaints.

“It’s not the first bout of controversy over sex education in Berlin. Two years ago, the Berlin Senate provoked uproar from church groups and other organizations when it presented local primary-school educators with a media kit about ‘sexual diversity.’ The material discussed homo- and transsexuality — and, particularly controversially, suggested that teachers ask seventh-graders to do pantomime role-playing on themes such as ‘orgasm,’ ‘porno’ and ‘sadomasochism.’”[5]

Many of the pictures are very graphic, and you can check them out both in Spiegel and other news outlets such as the Atlantic.[6] I contacted my German friend, Dr. Fredrick Toben, to get his take on this. He wrote back and said:

“Parents are protesting against such stuff being taught compulsorily in schools – and those who refuse to have their children exposed to it are fined – if the fine is not paid, then it’s off to prison. It reminds me of how in Australian government and private schools there is now compulsory Holocaust education!

“It’s the secular state trying to cope with the vacuum left by eliminating moral education that was covered through religious education. This is where philosophy comes in – the atheist doesn’t seem to understand that we need to have a transcendental/metaphysical belief system, that questions about God/Nature need to be addressed, etc.”

So, the sex industry basically controls much of the West. In fact, one can reasonably say that students in much of the Western World have fallen into what one might called immodest apparel. Schools in France want Muslims to do the same. Recently,

“A 15-year-old French Muslim girl has been banned from her classroom for wearing a long black skirt, seen as going against France’s law guaranteeing secularism. She missed two days this month in a dispute over her skirt, French education officials said Wednesday, and the issue remains unresolved…

“The student, identified as Sarah, was among a group of at least five girls who arrived at the Leo Lagrange school in recent weeks with long skirts — and Islamic headscarves which they removed before entering school…

“The students were asked to change into ‘neutral clothing’ before coming to class. Sarah complied, then stopped coming to class, the Academy Services said.”[7]

In the Zionist scheme of things, “neutral clothing” means sex appeal. “Neutral clothing” means following pop stars and celebrities wearing virtually nothing. “Neutral clothing,” as Madonna would have put it, means drawing men to their death.

Parents, who obvioulsy have been living on a steady-diet of pop culture, are also getting in to the act, though somewhat indirectly:

“Haven Middle School administrators notified parents that female students are no longer allowed to wear shorts, leggings, or yoga pants because those articles of clothing might be ‘too distracting’ for their male peers. That’s sparked a protest among parents and students in the Evanston, Illinois area, who are arguing it’s not girls’ responsibility to accommodate the boys in their classes.

“More than 500 students have signed onto a petition protesting the new dress code policy, which they say is sexist because it’s only targeting girls’ clothing. Some female students have chosen to defy the ban and are wearing leggings and yoga pants to school in protest. A poster plastered in Haven Middle School reads, ‘Are my pants lowering your test scores?’

“Two parents, Juliet and Kevin Bond, sent a letter to the school principal arguing that this approach toward the dress code is furthering unhealthy attitudes about sexuality.” 

“Mad Max director George Miller enlisted the help of activist, feminist icon, and Vagina Monologues author Eve Ensler in order to ensure that Fury Road wasn’t just another story about helpless female victims; it’s a story about empowered survivors.”[10]

Actress Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, who plays in the movie, acknowledged,

“We were so lucky that George arranged for Eve Ensler, who wrote the Vagina Monologues, to fly in and work with us girls for about a week. We did extensive research with her…

“We were able to pick her brain for a week. She told us the most tragic stories I’ve ever heard in my life, which gave us so much background to our characters. We really wanted to kind of showcase that. It was a privilege to have her around to make these characters something more then just five beautiful girls.”[11]

Keep in mind that Eve Ensler is the Jewish revolutionary who has corrupted Catholic institutions like University of Notre Dame and countries like India with her feminist ideology and her Vagina Monologues.[12]

Michael Jones wrote back in 2003:

The Vagina Monologues is not something that students study; it is something that is done to students to produce behavioral and psychic effects. Its main purpose is to break down their modesty and corrupt their morals. The students were being acted upon (even if by other students) in a way that was calculated to modify their behavior, not clarify their thought. If anything, the play was an attempt to short-circuit the thinking process. It was a deliberate attempt to subvert reason by shock and arousal of passion.

“The Vagina Monologues, in other words, is not academic discourse. It is social engineering. It is the orchestration of obscenity for political purposes. As social engineering, The Vagina Monologues has more in common with the Tuskeegee Syphilis experiments than the performance of a play by Shakespeare. As such, it has no place in any public forum, much less at a university, much less at a Catholic university.”[13]

Steven Klein studio
Steven Klein studio

The biggest question is this: who is implicitly pushing the removal of dress codes in schools in America? The ACLU, a largely Jewish organization. If you think this is inconceivable, then perhaps you should read Murray Friedman’s The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and Public Policy, in which it is argued that Jewish organizations completely subvert the largely Protestant mores in America.

One of the key figures during that time was none other than Leo Pfeffer, “the son of an immigrant Orthodox rabbi,” who, at the age of 15, “was deeply troubled by the daily Bible reading by Miss Knox, ‘probably a Protestant lady.’”[14] Jewish organizations, Friedman writes, “have successfully challenged Bible reading in the public schools and any form of state aid to parochial schools.”[15]

What we are progressively seeing is that the public school system in America has largely been subverted by Jewish ideology, and we all know the consequences of that. Things have gotten so bad over the years that basically no one wants to enforce the law when it comes to dress codes. In fact, Ruthann Robson, a professor at CYNY, writes in the LA Times that having dress codes where saggy pants should not be allowed in schools is based on “anti-democratic principles.”[16]

The same thing seems to be happening in France, where decent Muslims have been stigmatized just because they happen to wear long skirts.

“Critics of France’s secularist laws in schools say they often thinly conceal a widespread bias against Muslims and immigrants in French society. Studies have revealed how Muslims face systematic discrimination on the basis of their race, creed and culture.

“Speaking to local newspaper L’Ardennais, Sarah said that her skirt was ‘nothing special, it’s very simple, there’s nothing conspicuous. There is no religious sign whatsoever.’”[17]

What does that tell us? Well, the regime is telling Sarah that she needs to learn from America, where things like “tossing salad,” “rimming,” and “eating booty” have become the norm. In fact, people on twitter recommended that Sarah, the Muslim girl, should follow the United States’ motto.[18] The regime is telling Sarah that she needs to adopt America’s model, where the masses are more captivated by Kim Kardashian’s buttocks than knowing what is happening in the real world.

As Toben has recently put it in his recent newsletter, there seems to be a “butt worship” going on here. This “butt worship” seems to have a symbiotic and sometimes indirect relationship with sex magic.[19] Even the Huffington Post did not hesitate to say that Kardashian’s “biggest asset” is…well, you know the drill.[20]

In order to show her “biggest asset,” Kardashian, of course, had to work with “Steven Klein Studio.” Steven Klein is a Jewish photographer who has frequently worked with people like Madonna, Brad Pitt, Britney Spears, etc.

The conclusion of the whole matter is that the sex industry, which is largely controlled by the Dreadful Few, is assault just about every moral and orderly principle. For example, in the Catholic sense (Muslims seem to have the same principle), modest apparel

“protects the intimate center of the person. It means refusing to unveil what should remain hidden. It is ordered to chastity to whose sensitivity it bears witness. It guides how one looks at others and behaves towards them, in conformity with the dignity of persons and their solidarity.”[21]

The sex industry, however, says the opposite. Children and students ought to be used as sex toys, and those who oppose this weltanschauung will be castigated as bigots and fools. This is why they have demonized decent Muslims in much of the Western world. 

[1] For a cultural history on this, see E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control (South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press, 2000).

[2] Quoted in Robert Mackey, “Kerry Reminds Congress Netanyahu Advised U.S. to Invade Iraq,” NY Times, February 25, 2015.

[3] E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008), 1055.

[4] Ibid., 1055, 1056

[5] “Oversexed Education: First-Graders Shown Explicit Sex-Ed Book,” Spiegel International, April 25, 2013.

[6] Lindsay Abrams, “How a German Elementary School Taught Sex Ed,” Atlantic, April 30, 2013.

[7] Elaine Ganley, “French School Bans Muslim Girl From Wearing Long Skirt, Prompting Twitter Backlash,” Huffington Post, April 29, 2015.

[8] Andres Jauregui, “Sex Doll Portraits Evoke A Future Where Humans Love Robots, Artist Says,” Huffington Post, May 20, 2015.

[9] Cavan Sieczkowski, “Charlize Theron On Why ‘Mad Max’ Is An ‘Incredible Feminist Movie,’” Huffington Post, May 15, 2015.

[10] Joanna Robinson, “How Mad Max: Fury Road Could Become the Most Surprising Feminist Triumph of the Year,” Vanity Fair, May 3, 2015.

[11] Ibid.

[12] E. Michael Jones, “The Vagina Monologues at Notre Dame: Who Has the Most Famous Vagina in History?,” Culture Wars, April 2003.

[13] Ibid.

[14] Murray Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 23.

[15] Ibid., 43.

[16] Ruthann Robson, “School Dress Codes: Miniskirt Madness,” LA Times, September 5, 2013.

[17] Tharoor, “A French Muslim girl was kicked out of class because her skirt was too long,” Washington Post, April 29, 2015.

[18] Ishaan Tharoor, “A French Muslim girl was kicked out of class because her skirt was too long,” Washington Post, April 29, 2015.

[19] For a scholarly study on this, see for example Hugh B. Urban, Magia Sexualis: Sex, Magic, and Liberation in Modern Esotericism (Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2006).

[20] “Kim Kardashian Bares Her Butt Again In Leaked Love Magazine Photo,” Huffington Post, February 3, 2015.

[21] Cited in Jones, “The Vagina Monologues at Notre Dame: Who Has the Most Famous Vagina in History?,” Culture Wars, April 2003.


All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. A couple points, Paul. First off, anyone that thinks bread-and-circus-based economies [with prostitution falling under the “circus’] are a good idea need only to look at what happened to the Romans. There are “many women that are out of work due to not having skills” because our Orwellian overlords require, as “1984” put it, “poverty and ignorance.”

    Second, you don’t seem to fully grasp the military applications of sexual immorality. As Sun Tzu said in “The Art of War,” “The consummate leader cultivates the moral law, and strictly adheres to method and discipline.” By destroying discipline to follow sexual norms, the discipline to follow all norms goes with it.

    “A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue then will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader.”
    ~ Samuel Adams, 1779

  2. I’m an actor who played Cadmus in “The Bacchae” many years ago in New York. Cadmus was a voice of reason, along with his friend, the blind seer, Tiresias. I see your interpretation of the play as lopsided. There were other points Euripides was making, and there’s as much poetry as revelry to the Dionysian legend. I’m also someone who lived in Riyadh for two years and rarely saw a woman’s face, never her body. This wasn’t modesty, it was neutering, just as is done to nuns, to make them asexual. I’m not reading any more of your writings, Mr. Alexis, for although I find the violence-and-sex mix of American movies despicable, I find your approach to sex equally perverted and disturbing, largely based as it is on religion, easily the biggest bullshit story ever told, regardless of its particular brand.

    • That old saying still stands: There are no atheists in foxholes, literal or figurative. And if you wish to keep discussing the truth without Big Brother’s permission, you are probably going to end up in a foxhole.

      “… we have no government, armed with power, capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
      ~ Founder and President John Adams, 1798

  3. A really mature society would have nothing to fear. If people would be schooled to know the meanings and implications of the intimate and the public, it would simply not be tolerated to show off publicly, because it is a barbaric offense. Public ALWAYS signifies the social body and it’s organs (the people and functions) and ALWAYS is a space of COMMON and therefore defined by rules. The intimate signifies the sacred, the very specific governed by direct close inter human relationship and relationship to god and is absolutely UNIQUE.
    All human societies ALWAYS regulate sexual behaviour, it has to because it is very directly coupled with aggression and the rule of force. The same is true for all other natural ‘instincts’ (according to Bateson there are no instincts, but interaction schemes genetically determined) each must be moderated for the sake of COMMONS. The blond Beauty must hide her pride in being a Beauty (and will later learn the humiliation of becoming not so beautiful plentiwise), the ugly looking will be relieved some of it’s pains in that not becomes obvious what is humiliating. There is a reason god tells us that self must die in order to find the right path towards him, because for the son of man what is his self must die and replaced with common while his sacred unique must become common. That’s the journey, that’s social evolution.

  4. the videos trash the substance of woman … young girls aspire to this, they see young boys and their fathers fixated at the screen…. a deliberate destruction , inner beauty, the substance of woman held to insignificance….see the fresh young smiles of the muslim women who preserve for women of the west what has been stolen from them…trained out with evil malevolence …. the substance of woman lost, do disillusioned men to turn to men? as promoted and planned …..then send all good strong young men to war …. a destruction of humanity we can no longer tolerate…. they killed the word Lady

  5. In their own country, wearing this garb is perfectly appropriate. But out here in the real world a lot can be hidden beneath those draperies that could be threatening to a lot of uncovered people. There is nothing wrong with the female body. Frankly it is beautiful. At least it is honest. Many make it a taboo, and sinful. The vast majority (except government war-fiends,) would rather look a nice set of legs than a baby blown to bits by one of our drone missiles after a Bush/Clinton/Bush/Oblunder lie. Many times beneath all this drapery garb there is a beautiful women owned and operated by a belligerent, and totally-dominating and controlling male passing himself off as a man. Sad. Many women are beautiful inside and out. But, outside of their country, where this attire is accepted as normal, it can hide mechanisms that pose an enormous threat life and limb. Want to wear your drapes around stay at home where it is all appropriate. Out here we have enough trouble with our domestic suit and tie bunch in Washington, D.C.

    • I agree. This is displaced aggression letting the instigators off the hook. All of this has been willfully created and managed by the same vermin who analyze each society for maximum conflict value.

      The girls in question know very well that France is a secular country, hostile to all religions. Yet they would be the first to agree that the French Revolution was about freedom. They are idiots. They are allowing themselves to be pawns in a disgusting fight with no cost benefit for them. They should either attend a Moslem school, or some school that allows for their garb instead of creating a ruse for more government control. Or maybe inquire into a prosperous Moslem country about scholarships and continue their educations elsewhere. They can always return later.

      Observant Moslem women in Moslem countries wear garb that would be acceptable in this school. The girls are being obdurate for nothing and they will lose. As will everyone else when control is tightened. They are stupid little tools. More importantly, who is goading them into this quarrel? They might think they have allies supporting them but they don’t. They are puppets of controlled opposition.

  6. @brubank-guy

    Not even Kama Sutra can ever come close to the stenchful Talmud in sexual pervesity and moral misdirection.

  7. They who wish the world compromise do not. We instead should be as spiritual as they would have us not, leave them to themselves. Each to socialize. Unto yourself be true. Be better be smarter be as strong as they would have you weakened. Think for yourself as much as they will think for you and be responsible as they will mold you. Participate with the world’s future as much as they would have you victims of it.

  8. Great article. It is ironic that the 70’s feminists complained about women being objectified by porn and fashion. Boy, that sure took a turn-around. It is a horrible situation for a woman to feel compelled to dress skimpily to show off a stylized body type that few woman can (or should) attain. True sexuality belongs to all ages and all shapes. We know about the surveys that show boys and men who frequent pornography not being able to ‘get it up’ with real women– nature’s punishment.

    The saddest part is the removal of love from a sexual relationship. Because it is just that caring bond that increases sexual satisfaction to a degree that no porn episode can achieve as its perversion escalates to only achieve some physical release at best. Porn and Sex, the inverse relationship. Use it, you lose it.

    • Pornography is always reduction, first, by the ones who create it, and then again by those who watch it and follow it’s trajectory. Pornography IS the CORE of Western civilization because it is the process of objectivation in being and consumable at once, it is at the Nexus of the Kantian process of practical reason -> pure reason. It is a regression towards a coercive automatism. As Sade remarked the Sex machine LITERALLY !
      I still remember when I asked my first girlfriend, what sex meant for her. She answered oh it’s like eating or drinking, one has to do it. One can see what devastation the conditioning or rather negligence creates. That is like asking what music is. They would answer, oh this are particle vibrations in some harmonic relationship. EVERYTHING that might be unique is eliminated. Western Civilization has used the scientific empirical(statistical) principles and also placed center stage into the social body REPLACING god. By doing so they embarked on a ride to death, because IT IS THE VERY EMBODYMENT of becoming dead ! Absolute objectivation only leaves dead body parts behind and exclaims THERE IS NOTHING ELSE THERE !!!! Therefore thorough embarkment into pornography leads you directly towards the question of death, life and meaning and can become a source of reversal. Many an old whore finds out that simple truth.

  9. notes about satanyahoo.
    one: they deprive people in Gaza everything that might allow them to live like human beings then call them subhuman animals worth slaughtering.. same goes for dumbing us down in the schools then expressing contempt for the stupidity.. is very psychopathic!
    two: bombing the airwaves with porn then complaining about people breeding like roaches?

    people in distress (war, poverty, etc) -do- comfort each other in the bedrooms. these so called elite using war and poverty as devices for population control is sure telling about how STUPID and psychopathic they really are, undeserving of ANY “power” over others.

    in poverty it can be cheap entertainment, as well as basic instinctual “can’t get us all” reproduction, Mexico might be the classic example of that, as well as Gaza. those who engineered the situations are SICK.

  10. Bill: I’m very reachable. And you’re right; it wasn’t written for me. Sexuality is a good thing, and people like you want to suppress it. Don’t confuse this with feminism support, as I don’t support that.

    Popadop: Sex is of incredible value, and easy access to it by millions of awkward young men would only increase their sense of self-worth and productivity. There are many women that are out of work due to not having skills. You belittling a potential procession as “little of value” is shortsighted and unfair.

    I feel like this VT story is from some non-secular Christian / Muslim / Zionist blog.


  11. “… prostitution should have never been outlawed. It should be recognized as a valid profession and taxed and unionized.”

    Yeah, our economy is already built on producing little of value. Why not stay on the path to our “Brave New World”?

  12. If a woman “sleeps around ” then she’s a slut. If a man does it he’s a gigolo. Celebrate it or criticize it but it is what it is. Also, ” don’t hang the meat in the window if it’s not for sale.” Don’t dress like a slut ( which most Christian “ladies” do-even in Lebanon ) and don’t be one either. It’s not OK to dress like a slut, ” just don’t be one..” We’ve gone from modesty as the norm to banning long dresses. Incredible. Read what St. john Chrysostom had to say about modesty. This wasn’t written for you Paul, you’re unreachable.

  13. Jonas, key item you miss is the role of massive free p-rn on global websites such as XVideos, a site which at moments has 2% of all global internet traffic! For Muslims, there is endless free material of girls with hijab veils but otherwise nude etc. In Europe you see young Muslim males obsessed with p-rn huddled in groups over their smartphones and iPads. And who do you think sponsors and pays for all that p-rn bandwidth, that is enervating & de-revolutionising young males across the world?

    Jonas, have you noticed that atheist / communist regimes are as eager to prohibit p-rnography as you are?…You should consider as well, that the way Abrahamic religions alienate sexuality from spirituality, is the core of how p-orn is able to subvert spiritual ideals in the West…Ancient India was much wiser with the Kama Sutra and the temple of Khajuraho … sexu-l devotion is one more pathway to God.

    • brubank-guy,

      First of all, I’d like to know the “atheist/communist regimes” that are “as eager to prohibit pornography” as I am. Second, even if they do, that would be in contradiction to what the substratum of atheism actually is. On atheism, there is no objective truth upon which to base morality. If you think there is, then you are probably not familiar with what atheist writers have been saying from time immemorial. You can check out the writings of Jean Paul Sartre and even Richard Dawkins. Listen to Dawkins in River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life: “The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.”
      In 2000, a number of scholars have written A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion. Perhaps you should check this book out. It is published by MIT.

    • “sexu-l devotion is one more pathway to God”.
      This would be new knowledge to those who have dedicated their lives to celibacy and solitary lives such as the humble monks as a devotional dedication to God.

      Apparently the Abrahamic religions were wise enough to recognize early on that sex was a distraction from genuine religious inquiry and on the contrary it recorded the perfidious, treacherous and betrayal Biblical events as having sex and seduction at the centre of these affairs.

      If ancient India was much wiser with the Kama Sutra and the temple of Kharujaho how come then the Indian societies are the most sexually conservative and their Bollywood movies would not even allow kissing on their movies up until recently and such movies are recognized as being ‘Family Safe’ ? Have they never heard of Kama Sutra which apparently originated from its own provinces ?

      How come ALL Saddhus and Indian religious pilgrims abstain from sex ?

      How come the sexual reprobates are not satisfied to do what they please but must also lower the existing modesty yardstick to legalize their perveted actions and pull down to their level those that do not wish to ?

      Of course you have lingam (phallic) worshippers in India and you have whole Temples dedicated to sexual activities but you never have these aggrandized whore-houses preaching their righteousness down everyone’s throat.

    • @Jonas Alexis: “There is no objective truth upon which to base morality”
      If that were true, then god is wrong. Because he tells us that nothing should be hidden from us AND that he is truth and the light. And of course he is right and your sentence is wrong.
      Dawkins is a very dirty lier, less then a piece of dirt on the floor by his own assertion !
      Has anyone of you ever heard of the concept of ‘Time’ ? Yes ? Fine ! Now what is necessary in order for time being noticeable, discernible ? Right ! A universe which is different AND equal AND directed. And we have living things, which are small space regions with extremly high(er) (in the order of > 10 pow 11) local dynamics in inter relations of molecules and energy, and this things evolve. 1000 Million years ago there where no forests, no land animals but only water life. Life has a direction in time it evolves to increased density in forms and complexity. That’s PRECISELY WHAT a tiny stupid brain like Dawkins NEVER EVER COULD FIGURE OUT NOT IN TRILLION YEARS with all the computers he is able to construct ! In the human society ‘morality’ is to be a set of rules, procedures which furnish the process of further evolution of it’s kind and of course co-evolution of it’s sustenance base ! And this rules are as hard as the heaviest black hole in the universe given to us by god, because if we can think the super-entitiy certainly does as well ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN !!

    • Danshee,

      Read the sentence again. I said in plain English: “ON ATHEISM, there is no objective truth upon which to base morality.” You skipped the crucial part of the sentence in order to make your point. If we knock this complete misrepresentation out, then there is not much left to respond to.

Comments are closed.