Lost in Translation or What BBC Cut From Their Yanukovych Interview

Viktor Yanukovych during his interview with BBC

Here is what its English speaking readers and viewers will never learn from the story on its English language website.

Out of over eight minutes of conversation between the former president and the interviewer about Crimea, the editors cut the responses down to several sentences, concluding with a dry “Crimea is a tragedy for the Ukrainian state.”Here is what the former leader had to say on the issue, according to the full version of the interview posted on the BBC’s own Russian language website.

Viktor Yanukovych said that he was in Crimea when he decided to leave the country. At that time he was already ousted and faced two options whether to start bringing together those loyal to him and begin a war or leave the country.

While that was a very hard decision, he opted to leave the country.

“If I hadn’t done it then, quite likely we would have had in Crimea something very similar to what we now have in Donbass,” he said. “Probably, in some other regions as well; we would have had a full scale civil war.”

“What is better for the population of Crimea? War or Peace?” he questioned.

“In any country, in any part of the world population would choose peace. That is why when Crimea was holding a referendum, people were scared for their future, for the future of their children. And Crimea did not want to take up the rightwing radical ideology Maidan was bringing onto them.”

“Maidan scared Crimea and Donbass and the southeast of Ukraine with their rightwing radical outlook. That was the main issue which forced the population of Crimea to build up the units of self-defense and defend themselves. And the Supreme Council of the republic made a decision to hold a referendum.”

“90 percent of the population voted for the exit [from Ukraine].”

“We knew only too well what the mood was in the southeast of Ukraine. We understood perfectly well what the mood was in Crimea. The question of exit [from Ukraine] was not on the agenda when I was the president, there was no talk of separatism,” he said.

Genocide in Donbass

Asked about what he thinks is going on in his native region of Donbass, the ex-president said that it pains him to watch the unfolding events, and can do so only in short bursts. However infrequently he watches what is being shown on the situation in the region, his heart always sores as he is always looking at the familiar faces, familiar homes and familiar cities.“Here are the graves of my ancestors, my parents, my relatives, my close ones, my friends,” he said, “It is a terrible tragedy.”

“What is going on now in Donbass is a genocide. Genocide of the population of Donbass. And it is being committed by those who brought in tanks and guns to shoot at the peaceful civilians,” he said.

“Even during the truce over 500 civilians have died. That is the disaster.”

Like any other ordinary man, the ex-president wants to return to his motherland. And sincerely does not understand why he had been deprived of the one.

Read more: http://sputniknews.com/europe/20150623/1023739814.html#ixzz3e4wRGTXs


All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. I know that Mr Putin has exiled or jailed the people who had been raping and pillaging Russia and its economy for decades – in particular the descendants of the murderous jewish bolsheviks who had somehow ‘inherited’ the power usurped by their forefathers in their 1917 coup d’etat. Strange that they were able to ‘inherit’ power and authority in a communist country where everyone was supposed to be ‘equal’. It says a lot about what the Soviet state really was under the facade. I’m not sure how much weight should be given to the words and accusations of those who have had to flee and evade the authorities in their own country. I seem to recall an Iraqi ‘asylum seeker’ telling us how dangerous Saddam Hussein was just before the Iraq war. He would say that – wouldn’t he?

    One thing that I am sure of is this – Vladimir Putin is concerned entirely with the best interests of his nation – Russia – and that of the Russian population. This is a very unusual stance for a modern politician – most of whom today are simply paid stooges. Putin’s obsession with properly looking after his own people – does not go down well with the usual bunch of crooks that like to spin the world for their own ends.

Comments are closed.