Iran deal: Bad news for ISIS & JSOP?



By Kevin BarrettVeterans Today Editor


They’re calling it a “win-win.” But the Iran nuclear deal could be a “lose-lose” for two leading Middle Eastern terrorist organizations: Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and Jewish State in Occupied Palestine (JSOP).

Will terrorist leaders “Bibi” Netanyahu and “Caliph” al-Baghdadi call a joint press conference to denounce the deal?

The Iran nuclear deal represents an existential threat to these two terror organizations because it signals a possible change in Western policy away from the destabilization doctrine. Instead of pushing Balkanization and chaos, the West may now decide it can live with a reasonably stable Middle East. That would mean a long, slow recovery for the region from the wave of death and destruction that ensued from the Zionist genocide beginning in 1948, and the accelerated genocide provoked by the neocon coup d’état on September 11th, 2001.

Corollary: If the Middle East ever achieves peace and prosperity, JSOP, like ISIS, is doomed. The people of the region have never accepted JSOP aka “Israel” as a legitimate state; as the region becomes empowered and autonomous, JSOP will be “erased from the pages of time.”

Already we are seeing signs that the West may stop supporting ISIS, and instead support those fighting it (starting with the Islamic Republic of Iran and its ally Iraq). On the eve of the Iran nuclear deal, the US finally delivered long-promised F-16 fighter jets to Iraq. (Had those jets been delivered on time, ISIS never would have captured Iraqi territory.)

Will the West also stop its multi-billion dollar weapons deliveries to ISIS? If it decides to arm Iraq and not ISIS, instead of the other way around, the head-chopping bogeymen will soon vanish.

And will the West also stop supporting JSOP, and instead start delivering advanced weapons to Hamas and Hezbollah? One can only hope and pray.

Below is my interview with Press TV commenting on the belated delivery of F-16s to Iraq.


US more interested in helping ISIL than Iraq: Analyst

Watch the video at Press TV

Press TV has conducted an interview with Kevin Barrett, an editor at Veterans Today in Madison, about the Iraqi government announcing that it has received the first batch of F-16 fighter jets from the United States.

The following is a rough transcription of the interview.

Press TV: The Iraqi government has received these F-16 fighter jets from the US. Why do you think this has been shipped to them at this time?

Barrett: Well it is interesting timing, isn’t it because those jets are years overdue. Apparently the US government has been much more interested in training and equipping groups like ISIL than in helping their supposed ally in Baghdad fighting against ISIL.

We have got all sorts of smoking guns that have come out in the last year and especially the last couple of months proving that indeed the US cautiously created ISIL. It was the smoking gun memo that Judicial Watch uncovered last May which said this was from 2012 and the US talked about then that they desired to “establish” a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in eastern Syria. And this is exactly what these supporting powers want – supporting powers being the US and its allies in the region.

So we now know as people like Rand Paul have publicly stated that ISIS is essentially the creation of the US and its regional allies and I think that perhaps at this point ISIS has worn out its usefulness. We are on the cusp of a nuclear agreement between Iran and the P5+1 and it may be that western powers are ready to admit that their strategy of destabilizing the region by funding these extremist Salafist and Wahhabist groups against the various regional governments especially Syria, Iraq and ultimately Iran may have run its course. And one would hope so. This policy is the policy of the big lie which the West creates the very extremists that pretends to be fighting but it is also policy of complete destabilization designed to break up the countries of the region. This is in nobody’s interest except with the interest of the extremists in Tel Aviv and I hope the West has decided that that particular path is no longer viable.

All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. The deal with Iran so far so good! but If I was leading Iran I would double down and massively increase the military, I would not take anything the American scum said or did at face value Yanks simply cannot be trusted to honor agreements and treaties!

    • We are not the problem – the Zionist/bankster criminals that have co-opted the government are the problem. Don’t be smug – your country is infested with them too.

  2. If one could talk, a fly on the wall where ever Bibi was when the sighing was done, has a great story to tell. More up coming cartoons and rhetoric we must endure. Though still, would he do something stupid of mythical proportions. OR will his bankster gangster handlers make him do some other dirty deeds else where.

  3. Good news for now, but what about when we get a proxy government of Shelly the Hutt or Haim Saban in January 2017?

  4. Is this how ISIS were possibly made ?

    American Mind Control in Baghdad.

    Spooks use technology “proved” on one-million dead Africans.
    Copyright Joe Vialls, 29 May 2003

    “Across the Atlantic in America, and in Australia, things are really no better. As I write, the American dollar is heading straight for basement levels, which in turn will lead to a depression and increased anger on the part of all Americans, aimed largely at corrupt politicians on Capitol Hill. Naturally the politicians will try to put the people down as usual, but what if this time it is a step too far. What if a few hundred or few thousand of the 260 million private weapons in American hands are brought into play, what then?

    The chances are that in all affected western countries, politicians and their real masters will try to invoke the use of highly unconventional weapons in order to try and save their own worthless hides. How successful they might be when that day comes, as it surely will, is largely up to you.”

Comments are closed.