Netanyahu: Napoleon of Global War on Terror


Benjamin Netanyahu is the Napoleon of the Global War on Terror. He pretty much invented the concept of the Global War on Terror back in the late 1970s. Will the Iran nuclear deal prove to be his Waterloo?

After the factionalism unleashed in the French Revolution created the basis for a reign of terror,  Napoleon Bonaparte took charge and transformed the chaotic conditions in his own country into a military juggernaut aimed at imperial expansion throughout Europe and deep into Eurasia. Similarly, Netanyahu was instrumental in organizing the chaos on the right after the failures of capitalism’s military-industrial complex in Indochina in the 1970s. Like Napoleon, Netanyahu seized control of the emergency and transformed the crisis into a movement for the imperial expansion of his Israeli home country on many fronts, including the expansion of its eastern frontiers and the expansion of its influence in the US Congress, NATO, and the world’s neoconservative propaganda mills.

The Israeli Emperor of Global Neoconservatism

Father and son
Father and son


Netanyahu’s rise as the Israeli Emperor of Global Neoneoconservatism can be said to have started in 1979 when he had his father, Ben-Zion Netanyahu, chaired the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism in 1979. The elder Netanyahu had been personal secretary in the 1930s to Ze’ev Jabotinsky, the founder of the extreme right-wing of Zionism. The ideological originators of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Likud Party, the militants of Revisionist Zionists fought underground for the sovereignty of the Jewish sate in the British Mandate of Palestine though tactics like extrajudicial assassinations and the blowing up the King David Hotel in 1946. This experience has given the Likudnik wing of Israeli imperialism special expertise in the media deployment of the imagery of terrorism.

Screen Shot 2015-07-18 at 12.50.00 PM Revisionist Zionists and their Likudnik descendants have opposed Labor Zionists by advocating outright genocide rather than negotiating ploys with the indigenous Arab population in Palestine. The more radical stance of the most extreme wing of Israeli empire builders was aimed at bringing about the aggrandizement of “Greater Israel” to span the expanse from the Nile River to the Euphrates River and the Persian Gulf.

Richard Perle’s “New Break” document delivered to Netanyahu in 1996 proved in retrospect to be pretty much the road map for international neoconservatism leading to the kind of outgrowths we are currently seeing in the bankers’ tyranny in Greece, the goon show in Libya, and NATO’s alliances with the residues of Nazi governance in the Ukraine.

Perle teamed up with the Canadian neocon spin doctor David Frum to co-author in 2003 An End to Evil: How to Win the War on Terror. Where the Israeli-American neocon directorate of the US Republican Party called in 2000 for a “New Pearle Harbor” to create the necessary shift in public opinion to realize Netayahu’s imperial plan, An End to Evil provided the instructional manual for what do next after “Mission Accomplished” on 9/11. The premier directive of the neocon think tank was to “support the overthrow of the terrorist mullahs of Iran.”

The goal of eliminating the Islamic-based government of Iran has been Netanyahu’s dominant preoccupation since he began his rise as Emperor of the Global War on Terror.  The early stages of his rise came about largely through Netanyahu’s skilful exploitation of the death of his brother Jonathan as an Israeli war hero in the Entebbe Raid of 1976.

The ambivalent success of the negotiators of the 5 + 1-Iran nuclear deal are helping to draw the world’s attention to the reality that the Islamic Republic in the heart of Eurasia is nothing like the country has been depicted by the propaganda mills of Netanyahu’s neocon media empire. The news is getting out that, from Netanyahu’s perspective, the real crime of the people and government of Iran is to have created in spite of the sanctions a fairly stable, viable and somewhat democratic Islamic society on the firm foundation of Persian civilization. In comparison to Iran, Saudi Arabia, Israel’s primary puppet regime in the Middle East, is quite obviously reflective of the real evil empire’s more diabolical attributes.

Screen Shot 2015-07-18 at 10.36.17 AM







All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. I must agree with Ann on this one, the Rothschild capture of the bank of England used the propaganda of Napoleon’s victory ,which they new through their agents was false. The French revolution was nothing but a color revolution,controlled opposition. This zioright wing likudnik appears to be a 100 year planned project. So here is the DC take over by the City of London subsidiary federal reserve and the zio aipac ,adl,southern poverty law center,Shelly Adelson and on and on. War,disease,crime, and poverty thanks to this ancient duality and hatefulness. The propaganda and false flags and isil are mercifully wearing thin on the masses.

  2. 1. I hope you know the prize netanyahu got for his ACTING during the so called deal with Iran,
    2. Did you notice netanyahu’s body language during his press conference along with British foreign secretary.
    I think it is all a set up because they could not change the regime and are now going to try the old tested method of corrupting the young in Iran ( who happen to be in majority) to change the regime, which they can only do if they live and work and are free to contact people in Iran.

  3. Bibi AMIN, is a terrorist and supporter of terrorism, with a LOT more blood on his hands than his brother Idi ever had. did Idi threaten the world with a “Sampson Option”? was Idi trying to genocide a true Semite race while screaming “anti-semite” about anyone not approving AND the whole time not having ONE DROP of true Semite blood in his veins?
    they sure went after Idi, but where is the outcry about his crazier cousin Bibi?

  4. If he and his likes could get that the problem is not the packaging, it is the merchandise. Enough with furniture sales, lies, manipulation, coverups and false flags… Do some DEEP soul searching….

  5. Why are these imposters who now are known as the nation of Israel… continually being referred to as the “chosen people”…they may practice Judaism but they are not the peoples referred to in Scripture….honest DNA evidence supports this conclusion….they have and will morph into any persona needed to gain a foothold in their targeted objective (e.g. changing their original name is one tactic)….just one reference (of many) that will reveal their deceit is Alice C. Linsley book Abraham’s Kushite Ancestors…

  6. Of course in the United States Napoleon tends to have a good name as Pres. Thomas Jefferson’s ally and the other side of the Louisiana Purchase. US fought Canada, my country, in the War of 1812 as Napoleon’s ally. Jefferson and Napoleon hated the Revolution in the French slave/sugar colony that became Haiti. Napoleon jailed the great revolutionary General, Toussaint L-Overture, and let him die in a freezing Alps jail. To me Napoleon was a dictator who exploited the ideals of the French Revolution acting in a fashion opposite to its real meaning L’Overture was the true child of the European Enlightenment and French Revolution. Jefferson’s was a similar fraud doing pretty much the opposite of what he tried to be perceived as doing. I think one can tell quite about about where one stands ideologically from where one stands in relationship to Napoleon’s contemporary reputation.

    • I can’t believe you still believe that myth about the French Revolution and lofty ideals. It was a massive gain for the NWO and the start of organized genocide. The ideals were only Siren Songs —beautiful, vicious lies to lure hapless idealists, which quickly morphed into chaos that controlled France through terror and bloodshed.

      The French Revolution was not French, it was planned and pulled of by the Rothschilds, their allies, and disgusting Freemasons. Even the smarmy psychopath Robespierre figured out he was being played like a piano and alluded to it in a speech before the Assembly of revolutionary guttersnipes during what became known as The Last Speech. His masters realized that they might lose control because their treacherous little pimp was getting uppity, so he was attacked that night by operatives, then quickly tried, and guillotined. Face up.

  7. Seen how he happens to be where a flag is due to happen so often ?
    In the US during 9/11, in the UK during 7/7, etc.
    Like he were invited.

  8. It’s strange to invoke comparison between Napoleon and Netanyahu. Napoleon spent the majority of his years fighting for France, leading rather than pointing. He enjoyed his down time as any general would, and yet he always had the integrity of France foremost on his mind. The following quotes would suggest that Napoleon would be * rolling in his grave* at the comparison; “The Jews provided troops for my campaign in Poland, but they ought to reimburse me: I soon found that they are no good for anything but selling old clothes…”
    “Legislating must be put in effect everywhere that the general well-being is in danger. The government cannot look with indifference on the way a despicable nation takes possession of all the provinces of France. The Jews are the master robbers of the modern age; they are the carrion birds of humanity… “They must be treated with political justice, not with civil justice. They are surely not real citizens.”
    “The Jews have practiced usury since the time of Moses, and oppressed the other peoples. Meanwhile, the Christians were only rarely usurers, falling into disgrace when they did so. We ought to ban the Jews from commerce because they abuse it… The evils of the Jews do not stem from individuals but from the fundamental nature of this people.” (From Napoleon’s Reflections, and from speeches before the Council of State on April 30 and May 7, 1806.) (Presented as an historical quote, not as anti-Semitism.)

Comments are closed.