Wesley Clark, Disloyal Americans should be put in prison camps



from  Sputnik News,  Moscow

Mochida family heads to internment - guilty of being Japanese Americans
Mochida family heads to internment – guilty of being Japanese Americans

[ Editors Note:  You just can’t make this stuff up. Wesley Clark is a smart guy and is supposed to know that putting your foot in your mouth is not a dignified way of getting attention, but he did it anyway. I could make a senior joke here but I won’t.

He knew what he was doing and the effect it would have. So now we are left wondering who is he working for here,  spending down his reputation capital on what is really a rare terrorist event for US, and inconsequential compared to the pile of terror victims the US government has piled up just in Syria alone, on the watch of our Nobel Peace Prize guy.

I wonder if he would want these camps for all of those involved in 9-11, and those in the coverup, including all the military people, and then all the disloyal Congressional blow up dolls working for Israel and AIPAC, the elephant in the living room that Clark and virtually the entire brass don’t seem to see when the classified Intel files on Israeli attacks on America are voluminous.

I am all for equal opportunity application when it comes to herding up the disloyals. We could have segregated camps, for ex-president, maybe a private one for the Bush family, then Congress, the media, the military, etc. We could lock them all away for less than the cost of one aircraft carrier, or put them on an old one and sink it.

All that said, this is certainly out of character for Clark. Maybe he was having a bad day, or, someone put the squeeze on him somehow. Maybe I missed something because I don’t watch TV much anymore. Did the “ugly American” come back in style while I was on my honeymoon? The Nisei Japanese were not supporting Japan and they got their internment tickets punched anywayJim W. Dean ]


–  First published  …  July 20,  2015  –

Wesley Clark, Army General (ret.) and former Supreme Allied Commander, NATO; Senior Fellow, UCLA Burkle Center for International Relations takes part in the panel discussion "Global Risk" at the 2011 The Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California, May 3, 2011.  REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson (UNITED STATES - Tags: BUSINESS) - RTR2LYGO
Wesley Clark, Army General (ret.)

The United States should revive World War II-style internment camps for “disloyal Americans,” retired general and former Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark said on Friday.

In an interview with Thomas Roberts of MSNBC, Clark said that during WWII, “if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didn’t say that was freedom of speech, we put him in a camp, they were prisoners of war.”

Clark, speaking in the wake of the mass shooting in Chattanooga, Tennessee, called for a revival of internment camps to help combat Islamist extremism.

“If these people are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they are disloyal to the United States as a matter of principle, fine. It’s their right and it’s our right and obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the duration of the conflict,” he said.

During WWII, the United States forced the imprisonment of as many as 120,000 Americans of Japanese descent, more than half of whom were US citizens.

Moreover, Clark’s proposal appears to call for the targeting of people who are not yet “radicalized,” but who the government thinks may become radicalized in the future.

“We have got to identify the people who are most likely to be radicalized. We’ve got to cut this off at the beginning,” Clark said. “I do think on a national policy level we need to look at what self-radicalization means because we are at war with this group of terrorists.”

He added that “not only the United States but our allied nations like Britain, Germany and France are going to have to look at their domestic law procedures.”

Murtaza Hussain, of the Intercept, pointed out: “The comments were shockingly out of character for Clark, who after serving as supreme allied commander of NATO made a name for himself in progressive political circles.”

In 2004, Clark’s campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination was highly critical of the Bush administration’s excessive response to the 9/11 terror attacks, Hussain noted. Two years later, Clark said that policies such as torture violate “the very values that [we] espouse.”

All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. I do feel that any person or group that arrives in say the US, Europe or the UK as an immigrant or asylum seeker – who refuses to integrate or obey the laws of the land – and who then openly makes clear that they HATE the country and people with whom they have decided to live – should be quickly invited to return from whence they came. No nation should be required to put up with this kind of arrogant nonsense. Such ingrates are usually devotees of supremacist religions or sects – for whom there is no helping.

  2. Jim – there is no doubt that this is the thin end of this particular wedge. The moment a society begins to round up those holding dissident views – you can be sure that the next in line for ‘re-settlement’ will be those people who openly object to government policy. Of course ‘government policy’ today in the west is what the banksters and lobbyists say it is – so therefore we will end up with the arrest of anyone who becomes an inconvenience or an obstacle to them on their way to total control of the populace.

    It is rather interesting that the Confederate States were the first group to take the American Constitution seriously – in that this document not only encourages armed intervention against a corrupt or tyrannical government – but it actually DEMANDS IT as a sacred duty of all Citizenry.

    The Confederate States rallied together to oppose the tyranny of the usual suspects – and of course their movement was ultimately slandered, disparaged and utterly misrepresented in its motives. They even want to remove and destroy the flag of the Confederacy as they re-write history – trying to make it a badge of disgrace – lest it stand as an emblem of righteous rebellion and defiance against those who want to control everyone and everything for their own ends.

  3. I heard that Clark made millions at his NATO stint, payoff for the drug shipments into Serbia destined for Europe. Don’t know if it’s true, but he seems ‘sophisticated’ enough.
    On the other hand, I am all for FEMA receiving the owners of the Feral Reserve for extended vacation – or simple termination.

  4. Former general Clark´s discovery of about 21 Sep 2001 may have been more or less repeated recently. This time, he discovered the MOSSAD operation called FEMA camps. Being from a 4 generation rabbi family, he obviously wanted to show support for Israel, and re-declared his 1st allegiance.
    Is the current NATO commanding general a relative of Clark ?

  5. Something about this gave me the Manchurian Candidate creeps.

    Cognitive dissonance, and the mind blurring confusion of the about face comments from prominent talking heads…the nonstop psyops is becoming just as much of a worn out rerun as… well…invading 7 sovereign nations in 5 years.
    I’m with you Jim, load up that Ship of Fools and be done with em.

  6. I think lot of people remember how after WW 2 it was decided who was disloyal (communist) and this time Clark wants to include the people who might become disloyal. Who wants to be the one to decide ?

  7. Unless Clark can remember that loyalty is to our “Constitution” and NOT to a band of corrupt globalist-friendly politicians, perhaps he should volunteer to get on the bus to the interment camp before we throw his ass on it. Until he understands that distinction, he is part of the problem.

  8. Not so fast on negative assessment of General Clark’s statements !! Any position taken in relation to ‘disloyalty’ depends on definition of that specific term. Not knowing General Clark personally, but being aware of his loyalty to his oath of service, one can only assume that ‘disloyalty’ refers to any person who has profited from their disloyalty to the US Constitution. Hence, I might suggest he is not referring to ‘common folk’ but to those who by their past actions should be concerned.

    • Agree, not so fast. Plz read again, and this time remember that he is from a family of four generations of rabbis.
      That fact alone provides the answer sheet. His family simply reminded him of his 1st allegiance.

  9. I happen to agree with Clark. In fact I’ll go him one better; summarily shot! Now, lets define exactly who is “disloyal to the United States as a matter of principle.”

  10. There has been a marked increase in ‘groupthink’ rhetoric coming from the elites and media lately, at the expense of supposed-constitutionally protected rights of the ‘individual’. They are shape-shifting the dialogue to fall in line with World Order ideology of ‘us against them’.

  11. He is one of the highest ranking signatories for a new investigation on 9/11 on the patriotsquestion9/11 site. This statement is bizarre. Another relate is he was affiliated with NY rep Eric Massa, another very bizarre series of events. Massa ended up being the swing vote on Obamacare, and later forced out by a bizarre sex scandal. The Massa campaign was quite weird. Democracy Now was spreading around at the time. I went with a couple to a rally for him to check it out. We were the only ones there and he just disappeared. For now, I’m thinking Clarke is firing a shot across the bow of those involved in the 9/11 coverup.

  12. West Pointless egomaniac loser Clark thinks disloyal Americans should be locked up. Is that so. Well why doesn’t the smartie West Pointless general lead the charge by example and boot himself into the slammer.

  13. Clarks elaborations hide more then they reveal and this with a clear purpose. I’m not a freemason, but the beginning “slaughter of the now unuseful patsies” strongly reminds me of the deep and truthful statements of Carl Radeck in his sowet interrogations “Red Terror”.

    It always needs the right time to bring such a person in front of the media and let him “slip away” some at the time strange words.

    The new formation of the Middle East is in full swing and most of us might be astonished at the results. The methods on the other hand, seem to be always the same. It’s just a matter of political conveniance after some serious negotiations between people in high up places.

  14. yup, as everyone else has about said, start with the false leaders who have radicalized this whole nation from the top down. the economic and legislative saboteurs, all those signing oath to the racist apartheid genocidal nuclear terrorist “state” of izrahell. those who made militarily occupation of Afganistan to protect DOPE production. those who support terrorists in Syria, Libya, Iraq, and more.. CAMPS are too good for these kinds of traitors!

  15. “If these people are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they are disloyal to the United States ….” …he’s talking about the McCain crew…those still desiring war with Iran…israeli firsters

  16. The wording of the NDAA makes everyone in the current Federal Government a traitor to the USA, who are providing comfort and arms and money to ISIS and ISIL. If I am wrong, forgive me, but this is my understanding. So WTF is keeping our military leaders from bringing out the handcuffs and frog marching these guys in to prison as I type? It makes no sense to have laws that are not enforced. It makes no sense to have leaders who violate the rules that THEY themselves write. Unless we, as citizens, stand up to them and make this point a pivotal one, we lose our right to do so in the future. Or isn’t that the way it works? Peace y’all!

  17. He,GEN. Clark, could have come under fire , but detention camps; If you are a naturalized citizen who runs afoul of the law you can be deported. If you are a natural born citizen you are within your rights to dissent. This detention camp business is illegal and who gets to determine who is put in them and for what offenses. Reads like Alex Jones’ summer camp of fear.

    • Speaking of naturalized Talmudic Jews and the undermining of America, WW II’s GI Bill created a demand for several tens of thousands of college professors largely filled by Talmudic/communist new immigrants falsely “credentialed” with fake and phony PhD’s by the New School for Soc Research in NYC, Univ of Chicago, and the Ivy League. To indoctrinate the public in general to accept the diktats of the Marxists, professors of all types were portrayed in film by Askhanism types with thick accents, possessed of benevolent genius, to whom the bewildered goy roles always turned for higher-level thinking. My point is that today we’ve got the third-generation version of these Talmudic and viciously anti-white-European Marxists, credentialed in their turn with bogus PhD’s, who now as “neo-cons” direct our foreign policy and before whom the Pentagon and congress genuflect as if they were playing goy roles in some grade B movie from the WW II era.

    • “…Talmudic/communist new immigrants falsely “credentialed” with fake and phony PhD’s…”

      Shoah Business™ charlatan Elie Wiesel (if that is his real name) was made a full professor without any academic credentials at all.

  18. Wow that was fast. One minute I read it on Sputnik the next it was on VT…. I agree with Jim Dean ….on….”We could lock them all away for less than the cost of one aircraft carrier, or put them on an old one and sink it”.

  19. I agree with General Clark about persons who are radicalized or potentially so – we need to round up all the dual Israeli-US citizens and put them in detention camps, unless they renounce Israeli citizenship and take a loyalty oath to the US that includes a promise to never lobby for Israel.

Comments are closed.