…by Jonas E. Alexis
One of the most interesting things about Zionist ideology and history is that there is so much nonsense and claptrap that it will take a historian or serious scholar the rest of his natural life to expose them all.
Kevin Myers of the Irish Independent declared back in 2012 that “Everything people believed about Hitler’s intentions toward Britain was a myth created by Churchill.” For example, Churchill perpetuated that Hitler desired to invade Britain in 1940, but it was a total fabrication.
On the contrary, Myers declared, Hitler “admired the British Empire,” and that he “offered terms that did not involve German control of Britain. Churchill refused to allow these terms to be read to the cabinet, and they remain prudently concealed under the 100-year rule.”
“Instead, Churchill’s determination to keep Britain at war turned what had been merely a continental defeat of its army into the enduring myth that in 1940, Britain faced a war for national survival.
“But the German naval leader, Raeder, had repeatedly forbidden his staff from planning an invasion of Britain. And far from wanting to continue the war, in June 1940, Hitler ordered 20pc of his army to be demobilised, in order to get the German economy going again.”
“The ‘invasion fleet’ that the Nazis began to assemble that summer was no more capable of invading Britain than it was Hawaii. It was war by illusion: its purpose was to get the British to the negotiating table.”
“Just about everything that people believed about Hitler’s intentions towards Britain in 1940 — and still believe today — was a myth created by Churchill, which he probably came to believe himself. Consider all the facts above, and then consider how that myth has endured, despite them. Makes you wonder, no?”
Yeah, it should make us all wonder. What is so pathetic is that Myers got paid to say things like that, but Holocaust revisionists have been saying the same thing for the past thirty years or so and have been persecuted all across the globe! David Irving has been writing about these things since the past thirty years or so, but he always gets into trouble because he does say some uncomfortable but true things about Churchill and Hitler.
Perhaps the bigger issue is that Churchill concocted lies about Hitler because he was working for the Dreadful Few. In fact, right after his father’s death, Churchill became Ernest “Cassel’s creature,” one of the most “influential Jewish moneylenders” then. Once that happened, Churchill began to hate the Germans. In the process, he starved the German civilians to death and bragged about. This is Churchill at his best:
“Starve the whole population—men, women and children, old and young, wounded and sound—into submission.”
Churchill got his wish:
“In December 1918 the German Board of Public Health claimed that 763,000 Germans had died because of the blockade. In April 1919 Dr. Marx Rubner claimed that another 100,000 Germans who died between April and the signing of the Treaty of Versailles in July, so the number of Germans who died from Winston Churchill’s starvation blockade most probably approximates the number of Irish who died during the Great Famine.”
Churchill was obviously used by the Zionists to starve the Germans. But by 1920, he seemed to have realized there was something mendacious and pernicious about the ideology known as Zionism. He said:
“There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others.
“With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd) or of Krassin or Radek — all Jews.
“In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.”
Yet Churchill’s real actions defeated all this great insight. In fact, he ended up joining the greatest mass murderer (Stalin) in the twentieth century in order to defeat Hitler.
In 2013, popular historian Max Hastings wrote in the Daily Mail that Churchill did summon bold lies, but those lies were good because “Churchill did it to save Britain…”
You be the judge: did this man really save Britain? Britain was still paying its World War II loans in 2006—and keep in mind that the war was over in 1945.
Now, what if the debt is six trillion dollars (the Iraq War)? How long will it take to pay that?
You do the math and see how generational children will have a huge burden on their shoulders. What is equally worse is that the mad man in Tel Aviv is telling us all to wage a frontal war against a decent country such as Iran.
Perhaps the Obama administration should upgrade the “chickenshit” thing.
 Kevin Myers, “Everything people believed about Hitler’s intentions toward Britain was a myth created by Churchill,” Irish Independent, June 19, 2012.
 E. Michael Jones, Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict Between Labor and Usury (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2014), 1201-1202.
 Ibid., 1211.
 Winston Churchill, “Zionism Versus Bolshevism: The Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People,” Sunday Illustrated Herald, February 1920.
 Max Hastings “Yes, they both used lies to wage war. But Churchill did it to save Britain – Blair did it to save himself,” Daily Mail, July 2, 2013.
 “What’s a little debt between friends?,” BBC, May 10, 2006; see also “Britain to repay £2bn First World War debt,” The Independent, October 31, 2014.