Vladimir Putin: The New World Order Worships Satan

"So, you want to worship Satan? By all means, but leave Russia out of it."
“So, you want to worship Satan? By all means, but leave Russia out of it. Rest assured that I will be your worst nightmare. You can quote me on that.”

…by Jonas E. Alexis


During the Cold War, the United States and much of the West argued that the Soviet Union was a “godless nation.”[1] Last year, Vladimir Putin took that pendulum, swung it on the other direction, and landed it on the Zionist regime. As Patrick Buchanan put it then, “In the new war of beliefs, Putin is saying, it is Russia that is on God’s side. The West is Gomorrah.”[2] Putin said:

“Many Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from their roots, including Christian values. Policies are being pursued that place on the same level a multi-child family and a same-sex partnership, a faith in God and a belief in Satan. This is the path to degradation.”[3]

If you think that Putin is just pulling your leg here, then get this:


The Washington Times reported then:

“In his state of the nation address, Mr. Putin also portrayed Russia as a staunch defender of ‘traditional values’ against what he depicted as the morally bankrupt West. Social and religious conservatism, the former KGB officer insisted, is the only way to prevent the world from slipping into ‘chaotic darkness.’

“As part of this defense of ‘Christian values,’ Russia has adopted a law banning “homosexual propaganda” and another that makes it a criminal offense to ‘insult’ the religious sensibilities of believers…

“Although Mr. Putin has never made a secret of what he says is his deep Christian faith, his first decade in power was largely free of overtly religious rhetoric. Little or no attempt was made to impose a set of values on Russians or lecture to the West on morals.”[4]

Certainly Putin put the moral equation back on the table. Kevin Barrett declared that Putin here was trying to “put the fear of God in the New World Order.” Barrett moved on to make the forceful argument that much of the Zionist establishment in the West is afraid of Putin because the establishment leaves in fear. “Russian President Putin is resisting,” said Barrett. “That is why the Western propaganda machine is calling him names.” Barrett continued to argue cogently:

“It is worth noting that Russia and Iran – the two nations most successfully resisting NWO regime change – are doing so in the name of God…. Putin’s reference to Satanism was a pointed rebuke to the New World Order elites, who – though they push militant secularism on the societies they are trying to undermine – are closet Satanists.

“Anyone who doubts this should run the name ‘Lt. Col. Michael Aquino’ through a search engine. Aquino, an avowed Satanist and credibly-accused mass child abuser, was rewarded for his crimes against children with an appointment as Chief of Psychological Warfare for the US military…

“The shock troops of the NWO’s war against religion and tradition (and Russia and Iran) are the neoconservatives. Operation Gladio terrorist Michael Ledeen explains:

“‘Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace … We must destroy them to advance our historic mission.’

“Putin is stopping New World Order ‘creative destruction’ in Syria and Ukraine. He is part of a growing coalition opposing the NWO – not just religious traditionalists, but also progressive anti-globalization forces, including Hugo Chavez inspired anti-imperialists in Latin America.”

Kudos for Barrett here. The regime proved Putin right by applauding the Pussy Riot,[5] a Trotskyite group that ended up having sex (literal pornography) at the Moscow National Museum. (We have discussed this issue in the past.) As always, Neocons like Seth Mandel of Commentary were on the front line defending their brethren.[6]

But the crucial point here is that Putin, like Emmanuel Kant and even John Adams and others, understands that a nation cannot exist without objective morality, and objective morality cannot exist without Logos,[7] the essence and sustainer of the moral universe.

In that sense, and whether he notices it or not, Putin was implicitly or indirectly attacking the Neo-Darwinian ideology, which states that objective morality is an illusion and has no metaphysical basis. It is here that we find again that Neo-Darwinian metaphysics is intellectually useless and worthless because it denies the very essence of a moral universe.

As we have noted in the past, serious Darwinists agree that objective morality is an illusion. The noted biology philosopher Michael Ruse once again said that “there are no grounds whatsoever for being good…. Morality is flimflam.”[8] Yet like his intellectual antecedent Charles Darwin, Ruse ends up contradicting himself in the very next sentence by saying,

“Does this mean that you can just go out and rape and pillage, behave like an ancient Roman grabbing Sabine women? Not at all. I said that there are no grounds for being good. It doesn’t follow that you should be bad.”[9]

Well, duh! If there are no grounds for objective morality, then good and bad are also illusion. There is not such a thing as rape or bad behavior. What is good for you may not be good for me, and there is no way of adjudicating competing explanations. In that kind of world, might makes right. Ruse does not really have a problem with this argument here. In fact, he moves on to say that morality

“is something forged in the struggle for existence and reproduction, something fashioned by natural selection. It is as much a natural human adaptation as our ears or noses or teeth or penises or vaginas. It works and it has no meaning over and above this. If all future food were Pablum, we would probably be better off without teeth.

“Morality is just a matter of emotions, like liking ice cream and sex and hating toothache and marking student papers. But it is, and has to be, a funny kind of emotion. It has to pretend that it is not that at all! If we thought that morality was no more than liking or not liking spinach, then pretty quickly it would break down.

“Before long, we would find ourselves saying something like: ‘Well, morality is a jolly good thing from a personal point of view. When I am hungry or sick, I can rely on my fellow humans to help me. But really it is all bullshit, so when they need help I can and should avoid putting myself out. There is nothing there for me.’ The trouble is that everyone would start saying this, and so very quickly there would be no morality and society would collapse and each and every one of us would suffer

“So morality has to come across as something that is more than emotion. It has to appear to be objective, even though really it is subjective.”[10]

Ruse, like some genetic theorists, really believes that “morality is an illusion put in place by your genes to make you a social cooperator…”[11]

This, by the way, is logically congruent with Darwin’s survival of the fittest. And survival of the fittest is logically congruent with Zionism. If evolutionary theory “explains how warfare contributed to fitness in the course of the evolution of Homo sapiens,” as scholar Bradley A. Thayer maintains,[12] then how can a serious Darwinist say that social Darwinism or even Zionism is really bad on a consistent and logical basis?

Thayer, of course, struggles mightily to rationally defend the thesis that “Warfare contributes to fitness”[13] and that “people wage war to gain and defend resources”[14] while maintaining that social Darwinists were wrong in taking social Darwinism to its logical conclusion. He says that “social Darwinists perverted Charles Darwin’s argument” and

“distorted evolutionary explanations because they misunderstood Darwin’s ideas and were ignorant of or consciously chose to ignore the naturalistic fallacy. Those who use evolutionary theory to explain aspects of human behavior must recall the social Darwinists’ errors. Doing so makes it possible not only to avoid repeating errors but also to advance scientific understanding.”[15]

But Thayer moves on to make this argument:

“The ultimate causation for warfare is anchored in Darwinian natural selection and inclusive fitness….warfare can increase both the absolute and relative fitness of humans…From the classical Darwinian perspective, warfare contributes to fitness because individuals who wage war successfully are better able to survive and reproduce.”[16]

Thayer repeats this thesis over and over in the course of the book:

“An ultimate causal explanation for warfare based in evolutionary theory begins with the recognition that warfare contributes to fitness in certain circumstances because successful warfare lets the winner acquire resources.

“For evolutionary biology, a resource is any material substance that has the potential to increase the individual’s ability to survive or reproduce. As such it may be food, shelter, or territory, especially high-quality soil or wild foods; abundant firewood; or territory free of dangerous animals, such as lions, or  insect infestations, or disease; and also status coalition allies, and members of the opposite sex.”[17]

And then this: “Warfare might be necessary then for offensive purposes, to plunder resources from others. In these circumstances, an individual becomes fitter if he can successfully attack to take the resources of others.”[18]

Thayer cites evolutionary theorist William Durham saying that

“War is one means by which individuals ‘may improve the material conditions of their lives and thereby increae their ability to survive and reproduce…Thus successful warfare would help the tribe gain resources, and for a swidden agricultural economy land is critically important.”[19]

So, is Thayer really against social Darwinism? Ideologically, yes. Consistently and logically? No. I honestly don’t blame him, for his intellectual grandfather could not solve that problem either and had to live in contradiction until his dying day. Darwin declared at the end of his Origin of Species:

“Thus, from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of the higher animals, directly follows.”[20]

Correct me if I am wrong here: isn’t he saying that war and famine and death are things that will get the higher animals ahead?

Scholars of all stripes agree that this is Darwin at his best. Yet when social Darwinists took his thesis and spread it across the political spectrum, Darwin disagreed![21]

If the Dreadful Few are in the struggle for survival, then the Goyim must swiftly be eliminated. That is certainly consistent with Darwin’s grand scheme. If people cannot see this and try to avoid this vital contradiction, then you can be sure that they are not to be taken seriously or they do not understand logic.

So, when people are trying to maintain an objective morality by either appealing to the so-called “evolutionary theory” or even DNA, then you can be sure that those people either are out of touch with the scholarly literature, are not well equipped to understand or articulate their own position, or are just deliberately lying.

Furthermore, to appeal to reciprocal altruism to prove objective morality, a central protocol in Darwin’s grand scheme,[22] is also a dead end because the life of Mother Theresa and countless other examples prove that this idea will not work. I was hoping that modern Darwinists would make some good improvement on this warfare theory, but so far virtually everyone has failed.

I am certainly not asking people to drop their cherished belief. In fact, there are many people who believe in the tooth fairy. But so long that this neo-Darwinian ideology remains intellectually stupid and morally indefensible, they can leave me out of it.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Alexander Solzhenitsyn

 Going back to Putin, he said in 2013:

“People in many European countries are ashamed, and are afraid of talking about their religious convictions. [Religious] holidays are being taken away or called something else, shamefully hiding the essence of the holiday.”[23]

The Zionist regime, of course, made the false accusation that Putin was persecuting homosexuals. But Putin moved on to diffuse the regime’s silly argument this way: “We need to respect the rights of minorities to be different, but the rights of the majority should not be in question.”[24]

So, yes, Patrick Buchanan. Putin is one of us. Any serious politician who stands against the Mephistophelian establishment is one of us. As Friedrich Hansen of Asia Times put it,

“Make no mistake, Putin is not targeting homosexuals, as he made clear with his welcoming them to the Sotchi Olympics. It also seems only fair to remind Western readers that ever since the 1980s, Sotchi has been the center of Russia with a vibrant homosexual subculture. Rather, Putin is addressing the whole gamut of post-modern incarnations of the ‘sex and drugs’ revolution: binge drinking of both genders until the doctors move in, elite illicit drug use, unmanageable crime rates, surging divorce numbers, Hook-Up sex on campus, out of wedlock births, fathers and mothers in puberty, abortion on demand, public nudism and human copulation in parks, gay promiscuity with a good conscience, swinger clubs and darkrooms, ruthless Internet dating and pornography and what have you.”[25]

How does the regime respond? Well, you know the drill. Owen Matthews, a useful idiot, declared in the Spectator that Putin has a “new plan for world domination”![26] In order to slander Putin, Matthews indirectly linked him with Willi Munzenberg, a revolutionary Jew who wanted to take the Western world to perdition at any cost. Munzenberg was so passionate about his revolutionary goal that he wrote:

We must organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western Civilization stink! Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.”

When Putin said that Russia will “defend traditional values that have made up the spiritual and moral foundation of civilisation in every nation for thousands of years,” Matthews declared that Putin “is on to something.” What is it? Matthews told us:

“Putin’s new mission goes deeper than political opportunism. Like the old Communist International, or Comintern, in its day, Moscow is again building an international ideological alliance.”[27]

He again emphasized this point so that readers could get it: “And again, like the Comintern, Putin appears convinced that he is embarking on a world-historical mission.”[28] He moved on to talking about “Putin’s conservative Comintern.”

At the other end of the political spectrum, David Cameron likened Putin to Hitler.[29] John McCain, Lindsey Graham, among other usual suspects, have all placed Putin and Hitler on equal footing.[30]

Historian Paul Johnson (sad to say) even went so far as to say that Putin and Hitler are basically two sides of the same coin. Johnson said that Putin

“believes in a strong Stalinist state. His goal is to reverse the events of 1989–the end of the Soviet state and dissolution of its enormous empire. He seeks to do this by using what remains of Russia’s Stalinist heritage: the military, a huge stockpile of nuclear weapons and immense resources of natural gas and other forms of energy.”[31]

Johnson is sad because “there is no Churchillian voice to sound the alarm and call the democratic world to action.”[32]

Johnson has got to be kidding. What he ends up saying is that someone like Churchill needs to step up and start lying to the West about Putin. It is so sad to read silly comments such as this by a good historian like Johnson.

But the real question is this: why do the regime and their puppets hate Putin so much? Well, Putin suggested back in 2013 the Soviet government was guided by a dark force whose “ideological goggles and faulty ideological perceptions collapsed.”[33]

“The first Soviet government,” Putin added, “was 80-85 percent Jewish.”[34] Sounds like Putin has read Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together. If so, then it seems clear that he will continue to challenge the Zionist regime. Perhaps Putin has been encouraged by Solzhenitsyn’s bravery. It was Solzhenitsyn who said:

“And thus, overcoming our temerity, let each man choose: will he remain a witting servant of the lies, or has the time come for him to stand straight as an honest man, worthy of the respect of his children and contemporaries?”[35]

Perhaps Putin is saying enough is enough. And this maybe one reason why nearly all the major news outlets have been relentlessly slandering him. Kevin Barrett ended up his excellent article saying, “God bless President Putin, who is putting the fear of God into the New World Order.” Let us hope that he will never be weary in well doing, for in due season he shall reap, if he faints not.

[1] Actually it was a Marxist/Leninist state.

[2] Patrick J. Buchanan, “Vladimir Putin, Christian Crusader?,” American Conservative, April 4, 2014.

[3] Marc Bennetts, “Who’s ‘godless’ now? Russia says it’s U.S.,” Washington Times, January 28, 2014.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Peter Pomerantsev, “For God and Putin,” Newsweek, September 10, 2012.

[6] Seth Mandel, Contentions: Putin Vs. the Punk Rockers,” Commentary, August 17, 2012.

[7] E. Michael Jones has made this very point in his article “Ethnos Needs Logos: or Why I spent Three Days in Guadalajara Trying to Convince David Duke to Become a Catholic,” Culture Wars, June 2015.

[8] Michael Ruse, “God is dead. Long live morality,” Guardian, March 15, 2010.

[9] Ibid.

[10] Ibid.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Bradley A. Thayer, Darwin and International Relations: On the Evolutionary Origins of War and Ethnic Conflict (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2004), 96.

[13] Ibid., 99, 100, 107, 114.

[14] Ibid., 99.

[15] Ibid., 102.

[16] Ibid., 103, 104.

[17] Ibid., 108.

[18] Ibid., 109.

[19] Ibid. 110, 111.

[20] Darwin, Origin of Species, 459.

[21] For a decent historical study on this, see for example Gertrude Himmelfarb, Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1962). Darwin was not as open-minded as people thought he was. “Former Darwin enthusiast St. George Mivart published anonymous articles critiquing Darwin’s theory. A gifted zoologist, Mivart would eventually publish a volume titled The Genesis of Species, an influential book that raised serious questions about the limits of natural selection, especially in its application to man. Far from rejecting Darwin wholesale, Mivart continued to embrace evolution and believe that the physical capacities of human beings had developed from the lower animals. But he continued to insist—like [Alfred] Wallace—that man was radically unique from the rest of creation and had a soul. Egged on by Thomas Huxley, Darwin became increasingly bitter over his former disciple’s criticisms, despite Mivart’s attempts to be personable in private correspondence and his public praise of the ‘invaluable labours and active brains of Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace.” John G. West, Darwin Day in America: How Our Politics and Culture Have Been Dehumanized in the Name of Science (Wilmington: ISI Books, 2007).

[22] See Denis L. Krebs, The Origins of Morality (New York: Oxford University, 2011), 41-42.

[23] Neil Buckley, “Putin urges Russians to return to values of religion,” Financial Times, September 19, 2013.

[24] Ibid.

[25] Friedrich Hansen, “Putin Stands Up to Western Decadence,” Asia Times, February 28, 2014.

[26] Owen Matthews, “Vladimir Putin’s new plan for world domination,” Spectator, February 22, 2014.

[27] Ibid.

[28] Ibid.

[29] Owen Jones, “David Cameron and the cynicism of comparing Putin to Hitler,” Guardian, September 3, 2014.

[30] Michael Kelley, “11 Prominent People Who Compared Putin To Hitler,” Business Insider, May 23, 2014.

[31] Paul Johnson, “Is Vladimir Putin Another Adolf Hitler?,” Forbes, April 16, 2014.

[32] Ibid.

[33] “Putin: First Soviet government was mostly Jewish,” Jerusalem Post, June 20, 2013.

[34] Ibid.

[35] Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Solzhenitsyn Reader (Wilmington: ISI Books, 2007), 558.


All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. …i guess you’re a little confused… There’s good & evil people everywhere, generalizations are easy ways to obtain intelectual security, but “puting everything in the bag” hardly let you come to any kind of truth. The masses are easyly driven to any kind of horrors “in the name of god”, but not all the sheeperds are satanists. The thoughts of Mahoma, Jesus, or Krishna, hardly are well followed by many of us, but, of course, you are not me, i’m not you, & so on. Your thoughts are not entirely wrong, or right, but you may realize that the kind of inner illumination that you propose is not accesible – FOR NOW – to our “child” human culture; we’re still animal babys, most of us need to be governed by sane rules, the hell you’re referring is the result of a few human-demons carrying the sheeple to the absolute anihillation through all kind of lies.

    • I’m sorry, my comment was a reply for the comment of “AreWeProgrammed” (August 12, 2015 at 8:25 am
      Organized religion (all of them) = Satan). I don’t know why it’s located out of thread… For Alexis my whole respect & admiration.

  2. Always suspected Putin is part of a carefully staged plot to fool the world into believing conflicts between two powerful groups of nations really exist in today’s world. Don’t believe in miracles.

  3. Another astoundingly excellent article by Jonas Alexis who seems to never fail in giving us only the best. His research is impeccable, always well documented and referenced and his conclusions about the pernicious damages of the Babylonian Talmudic driven and controlled Tribe are well justified.

    Certainly President Putin’s willingness to call a spade a spade by attributing Satanism as the driving force behind the Western NWO Axis of Evil (the UK, Israel and America), is completely justified and marks a major turning point in World History.

    Stay tuned and watch the pernicious RKM Tribalists completely dis-empowered in the weeks and months ahead. Judgement is now on the way to the RKM and its Cutouts because the whole World is now turning against them. An no one deserve judgement more than the incredibly evil, parasitical, anti-human RKM and its Cutouts. They have been working hard to produce Hell on Earth and now its their turn to reap the judgement for it. See if Lucifer can save them from this coming judgement!

  4. People are weird. That lady pretending to care about other peoples feelings with regard to that statue was even more weird. Detroit is heading to the cesspool. The whole city will be a red light district in two months.

  5. Organized religion (all of them) = Satan

    It was Christians that slaughtered tens of millions of Native Americans. It was Christians that transported Africans to America and enslaved them. It was religious beliefs that have caused pretty much every war, execution, and sacrifice on Earth. It was Christians that created Communism. It was the Jesuits, the Society of Jesus, that took the concept of Communism right out of the book of Acts and tested it first in Paraguay long before Marx put his spin on it. It’s Christians the Jews in Israel kneel before, just as they did when they sold out to Rome two thousand years ago. It’s Christians that oppress and carry huge prejudices towards anyone not a Christian – just as Jews and Muslims do. It’s Protestant Christians that kneel to Rome every Sunday. Learn more by reading (Re)Vision at universal-rights dot com. You’ll need a U.S. based IP address though.

    Organized Religion = death and oppression = Satan (the adversary to good).

    • If people do the opposite of what a religion says, it must be the religion’s fault… -_-

      “We have now, it Seems a National Bible Society, to propagate King James’s Bible, through all Nations. Would it not be better to apply these pious Subscriptions, to purify Christendom from the Corruptions of Christianity; than to propagate those Corruptions in Europe Asia, Africa and America! … Conclude not from all this, that I have renounced the Christian religion, or that I agree with [Charles Francois] Dupuis in all his Sentiments. Far from it. I see in every Page, Something to recommend Christianity in its Purity and Something to discredit its Corruptions. … The Ten Commandments and the Sermon on the Mount contain my Religion.”
      ~ President John Adams, 1816

  6. Even an Atheist can appreciate the benefits of the Christian faith. It protects the family, promotes the community, celebrates births, marriage, deaths. The Neo-Con/ Zionists have done nothing to improve society. Quite the contrary, in the twentieth century alone, over 66 million, mostly Christians, died in the Gulag system. If the Neo-Con Zionists are Satanist or not, it matters little. Their behavior is unacceptable. We are rapidly being developed into a interlocking Corporate controlled Neo-Con Zionist slave planet. Any resistance to the destruction of the human condition is welcome.

  7. “We must obey the laws of God, not men.”
    ~ Acts 5:29

    How is it the religion’s fault if people do not actually follow it? Besides, wasn’t Butler a Christian? Do you think he spoke truth to power because it was good for his health? Dying about a year before Pearl Harbor was probably not a coincidence.

  8. absolutely luciferian, correct! sold their souls for power/wealth and ARE at war against all God’s creation at every level possible, GMO, chemtrails, wars, DU, Psyops..
    all for profits and if someone speaks out, “kill prophets for profits”. Stan Meyer (water powered car) was killed for “big oil” and “big energy”, cant have a home getting free power with a little engine spinning away or a boat that can travel the world for free.. oh hell no!

    Berlusconi has made many trips to Putin-land and the former KGB/FSB chief has reciprocated, visiting Berlusconi’s huge luxury estate in the exclusive Porto Cervo enclave on the island of Sardinia’s Emerald Coast. Putin has even sent his teenage daughters to vacation at Berlusconi’s villa, a move that certainly calls into question Putin’s parental wisdom, considering the 75-year-old Berlusconi’s notoriety for bacchanalian orgies with young women, known as his “Bunga-Bunga Parties.”

    And, as we reported last year, the Putin-Berlusconi plot thickened when Putin bought a neighboring luxury villa (albeit much smaller than Berlusconi’s) at Porto Cervo for 10 million euros. Where did Putin acquire the resources to buy a vacation domicile on one of the toniest pieces of real estate on the planet? He surely couldn’t have swung such a deal on his official KGB pay alone, or his salary as president or prime minister. The fact that that question was not even an issue in the Russian elections speaks volumes about the business-as-usual attitude toward institutionalized political corruption in Russia. Putin is, after all, the chief don or godfather in the Mafia State known as Russia, and it is more or less expected that he will partake of the same benefits that he and his Kremlin cronies

  10. Does Mr. Alexis consider the work of various philosophers who have developed systems for moral behavior that are not based on arbitrary rules provided by a sky god through a prophet? The is much middle ground between Abrahamic religion and social Darwinism.

    • Are you denying the Judeo and Christian God of all creation, whom you dismiss as a “sky god,” on a priori or empirical grounds, and is the presumably non-theistic system of morals you allude to, is that based on a priori or empirical grounds? We know more or less what Jews and Christians believe on ultimate questions, but what do you believe accounts for Being, what system of morals do you subscribe to, and why? You comment here all the time so it’d be worth knowing a bit about you.

    • Natural Law – codified in the “Old Testament” – established “common law.” It is the reason people can expect to be punished for violating others in all of the ways described. I’m not talking about the Levitical Priesthood code either – as that was abolished – because it was never the Creator’s full intention – only for a time to establish introspection within mankind.

      Psalm 50:7-23; Hebrews 10:4-6

    • “Are you denying the Judeo and Christian God of all creation, whom you dismiss as a ‘sky god,’…”

      I find the existence of YHWH and the FSM to be equally probable.

    • A law that is not enforced is just a suggestion, so unless one believes the FSM rewards following natural law and punishes the breaking of it, that faith has no affect on morality. Big Brother, the Almighty Dollar, and similar man-gods definitely enforce their laws, so why should anyone defy them?

      Read our Declaration of Independence: People “are endowed BY THEIR CREATOR with certain unalienable Rights.” The enforcement to respect those Rights, that morality must come from an authority higher than man.

    • That’s it, Worker Bee, you accept both as at least probable, and equally so at that? But, you probably meant to say something else. Of course you feel no need to justify hateful slurs against the majority of Americans, since if there’s apparently one thing sacred in WB’s world, it’s his right to express strong opinions and rather than defend them disappear up his own arse with an attempt at cleverness–like something right out of the hasbara troll’s playbook. Incidentally, are you an American vet or just trolling this site?

  11. Ironic that so many “Christians” support Zionism and hate Muslims when one considers that Islam respects Christianity as a “prior revealed religion” and reveres Jesus* as a true prophet of God born to a virgin (one of two persons who Muslims follow with PBUH after their names), while Talmudic Judaism considers the teachings of Jesus a heresy, and had him executed by the Sanhedrin court for blasphemy, followed by eternity in a boiling pot of excrement in Hell.

    *And the Shia believe when the Imam Mahdi returns to bring peace to the world, Jesus will be with him.

  12. Historian Paul Johnson (sad to say) even went so far as to say that Putin and Hitler are basically two sides of the same coin…. Johnson is sad because “there is no Churchillian voice to sound the alarm and call the democratic world to action.”

    Out of Churchill, FDR, Hitler, and Stalin, Hitler was the only true patriot instead of being a tool of the international banksters, and certainly the most moral of the four (if you look at real history, and not the Zionist caricature of Hitler as “Satan for secularists”).

  13. “This, by the way, is logically congruent with Darwin’s survival of the fittest. And survival of the fittest is logically congruent with Zionism.”

    Most self-alleged social Darwinists are persons from privileged classes, born on third base but pretending they hit a triple. Find me a promoter of “social Darwinism” in the media or academia whose parent(s) worked at near minimum wage so they grew up in poverty.

    Zionists are generally in the same category – they get well paying jobs with little real work through their 13th Tribe connections, while the real work is done by a European descent goy at half the pay (of course, lower class “white” goyim have no social connections, fancy private school education background, or trust fund advantages; but are also denied the affirmative action benefits the a racial minority from an upper middle-class or even upper class background would have).

  14. …yes there are Christian zionist who have been deceived (and in the case of television evangelist, sold their soul to the devil) into the satanic dreadful few, but that is not true of all Christians, only the ones under the zionist’s spell.

  15. Jonas , Dr. Barrett, and Vlad Putin all correct. There is a huge difference between certain atheistic tribes and others, and theistic people. Humans and their languages and cultures from all throughout Africa and Asia are semitic.

  16. Calling all men of good will: Satan’s days are numbered. He will be defeated, but, will try to harm as many of you soldiers as he can, and take you to hell for all eternity. He has a deep hatred for the True Catholic God, and for all men. The Most Holy Virgin Mary, helped by the blessed Archangel Michael, will defeat him in the coming days; the 2 witnesses will do their part for his destruction, as well. And then, The Lord Jesus Christ will come and reign forever in the New Heavenly Jerusalem. All evil men who do not convert, repent and abjure, will be slain. Do not say to me, that you have not been warned! You condemn your own self, when you do not live the law on all men’s hearts, to seek to come to know, love and serve the Blessed Lord God and Savior, Jesus Christ, Second Person of The Most Holy Trinity. If you did, you would listen and do what God calls you to do. There is only one place in the world, that I know of that teaches all of God’s holy truths: JohnTheBaptist.us We are in the end stages of the great apostasy. The antichrist will be defeated forever. All his followers, will be cast into hell for all eternity, except the few who may repent.

    • There is no such thing as Catholic God or, God of Israel or, God of Islam.
      There is though, ONE God of all humanity.

      There is no Trinity but ONE God, known by different names.

      Satan does not fight physically, but makes fools to deviate from the right path. He (Satan) misguides into believing that which is not true, for example the ‘Trinity worship’ for which the Crusaders killed thousands upon thousands of innocent people.

      Jesus (pbuh) will come back and follow the law of Muhammad (pbuh) as before he followed the law of Moses (pbuh) and defeat the rebellious and misguided.

  17. @ Allesandro

    “We need a hero.”

    Waiting for a knight in shining armor to ride in on his great white steed is an excuse for not taking action in the here and now. In short, it is cowardice.

    We do not need a hero; rather, we need to summon the courage to become heroes ourselves.

    “Waiting for Godot” is absurd, because Godot never arrives.

    • I agree, it is our inherent desire for the proverbial hero to save the day, absolving us of our responsibilities; that it is our very desire that creates monsters, who tell us what we want to hear, allaying all our fear, and to ultimately crush us with our ignorance. We are responsible to allowing men, groups, corporations, what have you, too much power, We cannot allow any of them too much power over us. It is much like the ring of Power from Tolkien, for power is an evil thing for men; and although he may desire to do good; evil will always come of it. Power, distributed amongst as many as possble is always the best. Ultimately, we must always retain the ability to cast those with the desire to become like the Most High, into the fires of Mt Doom, for if we don’t Doom will cast us there instead

  18. “Warfare might be necessary then for offensive purposes, to plunder resources from others. In these circumstances, an individual becomes fitter if he can successfully attack to take the resources of others.”

    If such a statement defines progress on the evolutionary ladder how does one define primitive behaviour then ?

  19. If the Darwinian theory of evolution is all inclusivelly correct then a question such as ‘when did the bees and ants become civilized ?
    is pertinent.

    We learn from the behaviour of these successful insects an orderly society based on their concious need to behave ethically and morally.
    Every class such as a worker or a drone is innatelly aware of its proper duties and functions without having to be taught.

    As in any society there are prodigals among them and offenders are punished, penalized or killed outright.

    Their entire existence is based on a rigid moral existence pertinent to that specie yet they also recognize that other species may not adhere to such moral behaviour and hence the need for elaborate means of self-defence. Some are physical defenses such as big claws and pungent chemicals yet others are sublime like behavioral threats and intricate ruses and tricks.

    We can not imagine a time when these insects were not ‘civilized’ simply because they have always been so as part of their intrinsic existence on this planet.

    Morality, as are other metaphysical concepts, is part of the intelligence of physicallity of which we are a part.
    The physical parts like atoms that makes ‘us’ are far older than we are and we just dont have any idea what they are and whether sentience and conciousness is within us or is part of plane we inhabit.

    We reckon to have discovered morality whereas the truth may be that morality is and always has been part of us.

    • “Go to the ant, you sluggard! Consider her ways and be wise” (Prov 6:6) – The Holy Bible.

      The Holy Quraan has an entire chapter of the Ant and another for the Bee, Surat An-Naml and Surat An-Nahl.

  20. Many Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from their roots, including Christian values. Policies are being pursued that place on the same level a multi-child family and a same-sex partnership, a faith in God and a belief in Satan. This is the path to degradation.”

    Not only a path to degradation but also a path to perdition.

  21. Dear jonas,

    People living in countries like Germany where there is no freedom of speech cannot see all the videos you post. Brother Nathaniel at real jews News has found a way around this. Just for your information.

  22. I believe in the recent decades morality of the progressive western world has been bought off. The blessings of moral and worthy life have been replaced by stories of projected economic growth, credit rating companies downgrades and upgrades, the years are observed as “fiscal” not as much as historic temporal, and all nations must obey their finance ministers in reaching fiscal blessing, everyone is set to pursue some kind of economic development scheme regardless of its actual talents or objective contribution. People hardly notice importance of values, sets of rules, outside the “fiscal” world and are unaware of reality. With this controlled emission of money the Ponzi scheme points out those that oppose it, may it be Putin, Chinese governemnt or Iran’s or even islamic banking for that matter.

    • I agree and would go further in saying that, domestically, the Zio-directed US gov is moving inexorably toward a final obliteration of Christian faith, morals, and dogma; or, the annihilation of the very order of being itself, in which humanity’s spiritual aspirations are treated, as a practical matter, as contemptuously in Washington as by Darwinists, both of which monstrosities are being consigned to the dustbin of history as affronts to the right order of being under God.

  23. As if we don’t already have enough examples of the Dreadful Few’s inhumanity toward Christians and goyim, we now see what Planned Parenthood has been doing to our unborn children, even to the point of keeping fetuses alive for experimentation, a form of torture. Of course NO other group is more involved than the Dreadful Few.

    Extremely disgusting, and to profit while doing it,… reminds me of Larry “Pull It” Silverfish and his WTC’s double insurance scam.

    We need a hero.

Comments are closed.