Putin Is Winning the War Against Satan Worshipers and New World Order Agents

"Didn't I warn those Satan worshipers that I am their worse nightmare? Why are they surprised that the Pentagon fears me?"
“Didn’t I warn those Satan worshipers that I am their worst nightmare? Why are they surprised that the Pentagon fears me?”

“Rather than engage with Putin’s issues, the Western media has mostly played the man and not the ball.” Bryan MacDonald[1]


…by Jonas E. Alexis


Patrick L. Smith of Salon made some intriguing statements last November. One can easily articulate them in the form of a series of deep questions. If Vladimir Putin is “Beelzebub by our reckoning,” Smith wondered, why did this man get “an approval rating of nearly 90 percent” in Russia?[2] Does this devil have super powers? Has Russia been housing the Anti-Christ, as the Christian Zionist puppets believe?[3]

If Putin is not the devil reincarnate, then how did he end up stabilizing the Russian economy?[4] How is it that Russian intellectuals and politicians cannot see that this man is mad or sad or bad? Did Putin cast a spell on them? Furthermore, how did Putin end up challenging some of the deep forces that post beneath political categories in the West, most specifically, “Republicans” and “Democrats” in America?[5]

And why, Smith asked, do writers in the New York Times and other news outlets quickly dismiss Putin without sober thought? Why did the Wall Street Journal declare that Putin lives in “a fantasy world of international rule”?[6]

I can answer Smith’s last question pretty easily. The political process in America—and here I am talking about the ideological forces behind Zionism and Neoconservatism (Neo-Bolshevism is preferable) in America—does not believe in democracy and Freedom at all. For the Neoconservative regime, freedom can exist outside the moral law and political order. In other words, freedom means allowing the Dreadful Few to do whatever they want. If Putin got elected by a landslide, why would Jewish Neocon Victoria Nuland admit that the U.S. spent at least 5 billion dollars creating conflict in the Ukraine and then Russia? Why couldn’t she see that the Ukraine crisis, as John J. Mearsheimer put it last year, “is the West’s fault”?[7] Why did the same woman end up saying things like “fu$k the E.U.”?[8] Is that really democracy?

Well, perhaps Putin had Neocons like Nuland in mind when he declared that

“The world is full of contradictions today. We need to be frank in asking each other if we have a reliable safety net in place.”[9]

As an alternative to the Zionist and Neoconservative machination, Putin proposed something different. Serious politicians, he said last October, need to “carry out a rational reconstruction and adapt it the new realities in the system of international relations.”[10]

Destabilizing countries for the Israeli regime and the Neocons is certainly not rational. Again, Putin probably had the Neocons in mind when he mentioned the United States, which he said “saw no need” for “rational reconstructions.” “International law,” Putin continued,

“has been forced to retreat over and over by the onslaught of legal nihilism. Objectivity and justice have been sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. Arbitrary interpretations and biased assessments have replaced legal norms. At the same time, total control of the global mass media has made it possible when desired to portray white as black and black as white.”[11]

Putin almost certainly had the New World Order in mind when he said:

“In a situation where you had domination by one country and its allies, or its satellites rather, the search for global solutions often turned into an attempt to impose their own universal recipes. This group’s ambitions grew so big that they started presenting the policies they put together in their corridors of power as the view of the entire international community. But this is not the case.”[12]

Obviously Putin has a keen mind and is certainly a genuine intellectual in politics. As author M. S. King rightly says, Putin “is a man of culture with a grasp of history. As such, he understood the importance of moral underpinnings for a healthy and strong society. Without imposing Russia’s Orthodox Christian heritage on anyone, Putin has nonetheless worked side-by-side with the Church’s Patriarch to bring about a revival of the institution that had been suppressed for so long. Literally 1000’s of the churches have been rebuilt across Russia.”[13]

Putin said:

“Orthodox Christianity has always played a special role in shaping our statehood, our culture, our morals. The Church may be separate from the State. But in the soul and history of our people, it is all together. It always has been and always will be.”[14]

In his speech last October, Putin suggested that some of those ideas can be discussed on a rational ground. He said:

“We will have a free discussion afterwards and I will be happy to answer your questions and would also like to use my right to ask you questions. Let someone try to disprove the arguments that I just set out…”[15]

Presenting arguments and counter-arguments is how things work in the intellectual world. Neither the Zionist regime nor its puppets can hold up to serious argumentation precisely because the system is not based on reason but on manipulation and deceptive operation. I tend to believe that Putin knows this, since he implicitly attacked this very system in his speech. He said:

“The measures taken against those who refuse to submit are well-known and have been tried and tested many times. They include use of force, economic and propaganda pressure, meddling in domestic affairs, and appeals to a kind of ‘supra-legal’ legitimacy when they need to justify illegal intervention in this or that conflict or toppling inconvenient regimes.

“Of late, we have increasing evidence too that outright blackmail has been used with regard to a number of leaders. It is not for nothing that ‘big brother’ is spending billions of dollars on keeping the whole world, including its own closest allies, under surveillance.

“Let’s ask ourselves, how comfortable are we with this, how safe are we, how happy living in this world, and how fair and rational has it become?”[16]

I am willing to speculate that Putin had the Israeli regime in mind when he mentioned “big brothers.” After all, we know too well that Israel used the NSA to spy on its so-called allies, most specifically the United States.[17]

Putin moved on to take the next step. The New World Order is supporting questionable groups

“because they decide to use them as instruments along the way in achieving their goals but then burn their fingers and recoil…

“First there was the military operation in Iraq, then in Libya, which got pushed to the brink of falling apart. Why was Libya pushed into this situation? Today it is a country in danger of breaking apart and has become a training ground for terrorists…

“In Iraq, after Saddam Hussein was toppled, the state’s institutions, including the army, were left in ruins.”[18]

With respect to nuclear weapons, Putin obviously terrorized the Israeli regime by saying:

“We insist on continuing talks; we are not only in favour of talks, but insist on continuing talks to reduce nuclear arsenals. The less nuclear weapons we have in the world, the better. And we are ready for the most serious, concrete discussions on nuclear disarmament – but only serious discussions without any double standards.”[19]

Putin, during the question-and-answer session, argued that “We are not demanding a place under the sun.”[20] What Russia is asking, argued Putin, is that all parties ought to abide by international law and practical reason. Double standard, as we all know, is not part of practical reason and therefore must be abandoned.

Masha Gessen
Masha Gessen

It seems that New World Order agents knew that Putin’s logical rebuke was coming. In fact, Satan worshipers had previously started to light the revolutionary fire against Putin months before he delivered his speech. For example, in March of 2014, the Economist declared that in the New World Order, Vladimir Putin “is a force for instability and strife.”[21]

In the same month, John O’Sullivan of The Spectator declared that “Europe’s ‘new world order’ is letting Vladimir Putin run riot.”[22] The Economist went on to say that Putin’s move “poses a broader threat to countries everywhere because Mr Putin has driven a tank over the existing world order.”[23]

Is this true? Does Putin pose “a broader threat to countries everywhere,” or is he really cutting Satan worshipers and New World Order agents to pieces? Well, let us see.

Author M. S. King argues that “Between 2000 and 2004, the cunning Putin sucked the Oligarchs into his orbit by reaching a ‘grand-bargain’ with them. The deal allowed the Oligarchs to maintain most of their power, in exchange for their support and alignment with the new government…Putin continued to ‘play ball’ with the mighty Oligarchs, patiently counting the days until he would be strong enough to crush them.”[24]

Once Putin got stronger, he confronted the Oligarchs who were strangling the economy and who were involved in covert activity.

”[Mikhail] Khodorkovsky was arrested in October 2003 and charged with fraud and tax evasion. Khodorkovsky was also suspected of having ordered several murders, but there was not enough direct evidence to try him for those cases. Khodorkovsky’s partner in crime, Leonid Nevzlin, later fled to Israel.

“Berezovsky and Gusinsky went into exile, facing prosecution if they ever return to Russia. Putin regained control of stolen enterprises, natural resources, Oligarch media, and the associated tax revenues. Many of the criminal Oligarchs ended up in jail. Those who escaped Sheriff Putin’s justice fled to America, Britain, or Israel. A few other big shots were allowed to hold onto most of their assets; provided that they behave themselves.”[25]

When Putin was reelected in March of 2004 “with a whopping 71% of the vote,” he “cleaned out most of the hated Oligarchs, but his pro-market economic reforms were yielding very positive results. Slowly but surely, Mother Russia was crawling out of the much and mire which the Western Globalists had skillfully pushed her into.”[26]

Once the Oligarchs have been stripped from their decadent lives, “Russian Domestic Product (GDP) increased 6 times, climbing up from the 22nd to the 10th largest in the world. Average wages had increased almost tenfold. The percentage of people living below the poverty line was cut in half. Once totaling 150% of GDP, nearly all foreign debt was paid off. Moscow became home to the fastest growing group of millionaires. Industry grew substantially, as did production, construction, real incomes, credit, and the middle class.”[27]

In the process, “After regaining control from the criminal Oligarchs, a fund for oil revenue allowed Russia to pay off all of its old debts. Putin’s government remains almost debt free. Under Putin, Russia has strengthened its position as the key oil and gas supplier to Europe.”[28]

King writes that by 2012,

“Putin’s Russia had reversed its suicidal 25 year depopulation trend and can today boast of what no Western nation can…Abortions after the 3rd month of pregnancy have been outlawed; a restriction that even many ‘pro-choicers’ in America would probably agree with. In the West, most nations actually allow babies to be aborted anytime during the 9th month of pregnancy.”[29]

In short, Putin indeed deconstructed the New World Order. In fact, it was pretty obvious to him that the New World Order presents “no moral foundations for modern civilization.”[30] Putin continued, “Any person who receives money from abroad for his or her political activity and by doing so serves alien national interests, cannot be a politician in Russia.”[31]

King writes that “one would think that the ‘free market’ Republican Party would love Vladimir Putin. Instead, they deride him as ‘ex KGB,’ or ‘a commie,’ or a ‘thug.’”[32]

Vladimir Tismaneanu
Vladimir Tismaneanu

The New World Order hates Putin even more because he has made “Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s classic Gulag Archipelago mandatory reading for Russian High School students. How ironic that most students in ‘anti-Communist’ America will never hear of Stalin’s atrocities while Russian kids will!”[33]

The fact that Putin has made Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago a mandatory reading in high school seems to suggest that Putin is familiar with Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together, in which he meticulously documents that Jewish revolutionaries were largely responsible for the Bolshevik Revolution. This point has been meticulously documented by E. Michael Jones in his magnum opus The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History.[34] So, when Putin said that the first Soviet government was largely Jewish,[35] he must have gotten that idea from Solzhenitsyn, who said unapologetically:

There are many Jewish authors who to this very day either deny the support of Jews for Bolshevism, or even reject it angrily, or else—the most common case—only speak defensively about it. The matter is well-attested, however: these Jewish renegades were for several years leaders at the center of the Bolshevik Party, at the head of the Red Army (Trotsky), of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee (Sverdlov), of the two capitals (Zinoviev and Kamenev), of the Comintern (Zinoviev), of the Profintern (Dridzo-Lozovsky), and of the Komsomol (Oskar Ryvkin, then Lazar Shatskin).

“In 1918 Trotsky, with the aid of Sklianski and Yakov Sverdlov, created the Red Army. Jewish soldiers were numerous in its ranks. Several units of the Red Army were composed entirely of Jews, as, e.g., the brigade commanded by Joseph Forman. Among the officers of the Red Army, the share of Jews grew in number and importance for many years after the Civil War.”

To return to our earlier point: why did the Economist and the Spectator attack Putin? Why do the Neoconservative caste system and their Republican puppets continue to call Putin “the new Hitler”? Why does the New York Times to this very day continue to slander Putin with dumb phrases like “Stalin’s current heir”?[36] Why has Gen. Joseph Votel, who knows pretty well that the US has slaughtered “numerous civilians in a wedding party” in December of 2013,[37] recently said that “Russia could pose an existential threat to the United States”?[38]

Why do people like Russian-American Masha Gessen keep saying that Putin was a member of “subversive groups” which had ties to the NKVD but never addressed the fact that Putin is no longer a KGB?[39] Why doesn’t she address the fact that Putin is implicitly challenging Stalinism and Leninism, the actual ideologies of the old regime?

More importantly, why doesn’t Gessen do the same thing for people like the late Irving Kristol, who bragged about being a Trotskyite in college[40] and whose son, Bill Kristol, continues to pursue Trotsky’s ideology all over the Middle East?[41] Why does Gessen propound the silly idea that Putin “wins by lying”?[42] Is that fair? Who is this woman working for anyway?

Well, it turns out that Gessen is a Jewish lesbian who helped founded the Pink Triangle Campaign and who has been described as “Russia’s leading LGB rights activist.” Gessen, who “holds both Russian and US citizenship,” has been covertly supporting subversive groups such as the Pussy Riot, which happened to follow Leon Trotsky in its ideology. In her book Words Will Break Cement: The Passion of Pussy Riot, Gessen admits that “five couples had sex in the Biology of Museum and videotaped it. The action was called Fuck for the Heir Puppy Bear, a play on Dmitry Medvedev’s last name…”[43] The actual scene was literal pornography.

But how does the West respond to Gessen’s book, which highly praises the Pussy Riot?

Wall Street Journal: “In a country where journalists critical of the government have a way of meeting untimely deaths, Ms. Gessen has shown remarkable courage in researching and writing this unflinching indictment of the most powerful man in Russia.”

San Francisco Chronicle: “Powerful and gracefully written.”

Foreign Affairs: “[Gessen] shines a piercing light into every dark corner of Putin’s story…Fascinating, hard-hitting reading.”

The New York Review of Books: “Although Gessen is enough of an outsider to write beautifully clear and eloquent English, she is enough of an insider to convey, accurately, the wild swings of emotions, the atmosphere of mad speculation, the paranoia, and, yes, the hysteria that pervade all political discussion and debate in Moscow today.”

The Washington Post: “What Gessen sees in Putin is a troubled childhood brawler who became a paper-pushing KGB man and, by improbable twists and turns, rose to the top in Russia…[She] does not attempt to weigh up Putin’s record but rather examines his biography, mind-set, and methods…as a thug loyal to the KGB and the empire it served who never had a clue about the earth-shattering events that blew the Soviet Union apart.”

The Daily Beast: “Masha Gessen steps into the fray with a perspective account of the new czar.”

Bloomberg: “Engrossing and insightful.”

The list is almost endless. Yet even John O’Sullivan admits that Gessen has been promoting “sexual liberation (with illustrations) rather than ‘political’ aspects of human rights.”[44]


Gessen left Russia and settled in America, where she continues to propound her subversive ideology in the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the New Republic, New Statesman, Slate, Vanity Fair, and U.S. News & World Report.[45] In the introduction to Gessen’s article “The Wrath of Putin,” Vanity Fair vainly said that

“Mikhail Khodorkovsky was the richest man in Russia when he dared confront then president Vladimir Putin, criticizing state corruption at a meeting with Putin in February 2003. Arrested that fall, then convicted in two Kafka-esque trials, Khodorkovsky has been imprisoned ever since, the once powerful oligarch now an invisible hero for the growing opposition to Putin’s tyranny.”[46]

As we have already seen, this is complete claptrap. Khodorkovsky, who “launched the Open Russia Foundation in Somerset House in London, owned by the Rothschild’s Family Trust,” was arrested because he was involved in covert activities.

So, people like Gessen have to stand for their brethren. It gets worse. Jewish scholar Vladimir Tismaneanu—whose father was an activist of the Romanian Communist Party and who later became “chair of the Marxism-Leninism department of the University of Bucharest,” and whose mother was “a physician and one-time Communist Party activist”—deliberately writes that

“Putinism is an ideological conglomerate bringing together Great Russian nationalism, imperial authoritarianism, and a drive to restore the lost grandeur of the Stalin era”?[47]

Tismaneanu, with no respect for history and truth, writes in the same paragraph that Putin “has abandoned the Yeltsin era’s adamant anti-Leninism and has become, especially in 2006, the proponent of an increasingly aggressive version of neo-Stalinist and neo-imperialist restoration.”[48]

Neo-Stalinist and neo-imperialist restoration? Did Putin invade Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan? Did he supply weapons to terrorist cells such as the Syrian rebels, who later signed a sort of pact with other terrorists such as ISIS? Did terrorist cells such as Nusra Front receive treatment in Russian hospitals? The Wall Street Journal itself wrote last March:

“Nusra Front hasn’t bothered Israel since seizing the border area last summer—and some of its severely wounded fighters are regularly taken across the frontier fence to receive treatment in Israeli hospitals.”[49]

Is Putin responsible for the current strikes in northern Syria, which killed eight civilians, “including two women and five children”?[50]

Why, then, did people like Tismaneanu have to summon lies and complete fabrications? Why does Jewish historian Walter Laqueur write books saying that Putin is a former KGB[51] but does not write a single line saying that Irving Kristol and his disciples, including his son Bill, are the political grandchildren of Stalinism and Leninism?[52]


Tismaneanu in particular has been influenced by people and movements like Leon Trotsky, Herbert Marcuse, Georg Lukacs, Antonio Gramsci, the Frankfurt School, etc. Now Tismaneanu is at the University of Michigan, corrupting young and impressionable students with his subversive (or shall we say Talmudic) ideology.

The conclusion of the whole matter? Tismaneanu and his brethren obviously realize that Putin was on the brink of attacking the “existing world order,” which Putin said is essentially Satanic in its ideology.

This existing world order, as Putin would have put it, elevates the worship of Satan above the moral order and above God. It has no respect for the moral law and political order and has always been interested in establishing what Friedrich Nietzsche would have called the transvaluation of all values and replacing it with essentially Talmudic mores.

Last October, Putin probably had this in mind when he said that “this system has become seriously weakened, fragmented and deformed.”[53] The Pentagon has recently confirmed that opinion. The Daily Beast tells us that

“The U.S. military has run the numbers on a sustained fight with Moscow, and they do not look good for the American side.”

The statement came from an article entitled, “Pentagon Fears It’s Not Ready for a War With Putin.”[54]

If the Pentagon can say that, then Putin is actually winning—and Satan worshipers and New World Order agents are losing their strengths. Two cheers for Putin. Keep fighting the good fight, brother.

[1] Bryan MacDonald, “Time for a ‘new world order?’ No, it’s already here,” Russia Today, November 2, 2014.

[2] Patrick L. Smith, “The New York Times doesn’t want you to understand this Vladimir Putin speech,” Salon, November 7, 2014.

[3] Matthew Avery Sutton, “Could Vladimir Putin battle the Antichrist? How some evangelicals debate the end times,” Washington Post, April 22, 2015. See also Gary Demar, Last Days Madness: Obsession of the Modern Church (Atlanta: American Vision, 1999).

[4] This is even acknowledged by Zionist magazines such as Foreign Affairs. Anton Barbashin and Hannah Thoburn, “Putin’s Brain: Alexander Dugin and the Philosophy Behind Putin’s Invasion of Crimea,” Foreign Affairs, March 31, 2014.

[5] Keep in mind that both parties ended up saying that Putin is “the new Hitler.”

[6] Josef Joffe, “Welcome Back to the 19th Century,” Wall Street Journal, August 12, 2008.

[7] John J. Mearsheimer, “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault,” Foreign Affairs, September/October 2014.

[8] “Ukraine crisis: Transcript of leaked Nuland-Pyatt call,” BBC, February 7, 2014; Josh Rogin, “State Dept Official Caught on Tape: ‘Fuck the EU,’” Daily Beast, February 6, 2014; ‘Fuck the EU’: US diplomat Victoria Nuland’s phonecall leaked – video,” Guardian, February 7, 2014; “F*** the EU: Senior US diplomat Victoria Nuland makes her position clear in bugged conversation with Ukraine envoy,” The Independent, February 6, 2014.

[9] Vladimir Putin, “New Rules or a Game Without Rules?,” Counter Punch, October 27, 2014.

[10] Ibid.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Ibid.

[13] M. S. King, The War Against Putin: What the Government-Media Complex Isn’t Telling You About Russia (Create Space, 2014), 53.

[14] Quoted in ibid.

[15] Putin, “New Rules or a Game Without Rules?,” Counter Punch, October 27, 2014.

[16] Ibid.

[17] See for example Glenn Greenwald, No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2014). We have written extensively on this issue in the past as well.

[18] Vladimir Putin, “New Rules or a Game Without Rules?,” Counter Punch, October 27, 2014.

[19] Ibid.

[20] Ibid.

[21] “The New World Order,” Economist, March 22, 2014.

[22] John O’Sullivan, “Europe’s ‘new world order’ is letting Vladimir Putin run riot,” Spectator, March 8, 2014.

[23] “The New World Order,” Economist, March 22, 2014.

[24] King, War Against Putin, 46.

[25] Ibid., 49.

[26] Ibid.

[27] Ibid.51.

[28] Ibid.

[29] Ibid., 54.

[30] Quoted in ibid., 53.

[31] Ibid.

[32] Ibid.

[33] Ibid., 54.

[34] No praise can be too high for that book.

[35] “Putin: First Soviet government was mostly Jewish,” Jerusalem Post, June 20, 2013.

[36] “What the West Gets Wrong About Russia,” NY Times, August 12, 2015.

[37] Dan Lamothe, “The swift, quiet rise of Lt. Gen. Joseph Votel, Special Operations commander,” Washington Post, June 25, 2014; Christine Hauser, “The Aftermath of Drone Strikes on a Wedding Convoy in Yemen,” NY Times, December 19, 2013; Robert F. Worth, “Drone Strike in Yemen Hits Wedding Convoy, Killing 11,” NY Times, December 12, 2013.

[38] “General: Russia Is ‘Existential Threat,’” Daily Beast, July 24, 2015.

[39] Masha Gessen, The Man Without a Face: The Unlikely Rise of Vladimir Putin (New York: Riverhead Books, 2012), 53-54.

[40] See for example Stephen Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: the Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 43.

[41] Trotsky could not send a six-trillion dollar bill to the American people, but the Iraq War, which the Neoconservatives spearheaded, did exactly that.

[42] Masha Gessen, “The Putin Military Doctrine,” Slate, August 15, 2014.

[43] Masha Gessen, Words Will Break Cement: The Passion of Pussy Riot (New York: Riverhead Books, 2014), 40.

[44] John O’Sullivan, “Turmoil Over America’s Radio Voice in Russia,” Wall Street Journal, December 30, 2012.

[45] See for example Masha Gessen, “Russia is remaking itself as the leader of the anti-Western world,” Washington Post, March 30, 2014; “The Wrath of Putin,” Vanity Fair, April 2012.

[46] Masha Gessen, “The Wrath of Putin,” Vanity Fair, April 2012.

[47] Vladimir Tismaneanu, The Devil in History: Communism, Fascism, and Some Lessons of the Twentieth Century (Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2012), 218.

[48] Ibid.

[49] Yaroslav Trofimov, “Al Qaeda a Lesser Evil? Syria War Pulls U.S., Israel Apart,” Wall Street Journal, March 12, 2015.

[50] Ben Hubbard and Karam Shoumali, “U.S.-Led Air Campaign Is Linked to Civilian Deaths in Syria,” NY Times, August 14, 2015.

[51] Walter Laqueur, Putinism: Russia and Its Future in the West (New York: Thomas Dunne Books, 2015).

[52] See for example Francis Fukuyama, “After Neoconservatism,” NY Times, February 19, 2006.

[53] Vladimir Putin, “New Rules or a Game Without Rules?,” Counter Punch, October 27, 2014.

[54] Nancy A. Yousef, “Pentagon Fears It’s Not Ready for a War With Putin,” Daily Beast, August 14, 2015.


All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. Lucifer or the all seeing eye is inside your head. The Vedas call it the pineal gland and it opens the crown chakra via tantric sex. Constantine who wrote the bible and then killed the Vedic priests studied in India to form some idea of how to twist the eternal truths.

    Yes there was a secret initiation for the disciples as Thomas lined out. How do you be wise as the serpent? Serpents coil together and lay motionless. How does ones eye become single? Via transmuting the sexual energy up the spine and into the pineal gland. How is one born again? By re-entering the birth canal from whence you came. The words of Jesus have been distorted for so long by backwoods preachers it is almost criminal.

  2. Yes and judaism was the only religion Mao outlawed. It just so happens that jewish nazis from Germany migrated to Manchuria and fought with the japanese to form what they hoped was the new world order. Omert’s father is buried in Harbin. Did Mao fool them by keeping his enemies close at hand?

  3. In fact this is the skinny on Stalin. You would be wise to remember they are not kidding when they say all roads lead to Rome. And yes the jews took it over long ago.

    4. Of publishing a false statement for the purpose of concealment of status: (1900 to present day) That the Catholic Church, more specifically the Jesuit Order has maintained countless false statements and documents pertaining to the status of Joseph Stalin. That Fr. Joseph Stalin S.J. was a trained, dedicated and fully ordained Catholic priest of the Jesuit order, who was recruited for a historic mission in his final year at the seminary in 1899. That in addition to failing to recognize Fr Joseph Stalin S. J. Furthermore, that the Jesuit Order did permit Fr Stalin to marry not once but twice, while remaining a fully ordained priest. That for his entire life until his death, there is no indication that Fr Joseph Stalin S. J. was ever defrocked as a priest.

  4. That is an outstanding bit of research Mr. Alexis. I am going to repost it if you don’t mind.

    Let us not forget also that Stalin was A Jesuit priest. He and Hitler played chess together in a masonic house near the Tavistock institute where they were being trained for the great war to have their respective countries bombed into the stone age. Hitler received gold from his mentor Pacelli to form the nazi party and Pacelli later became pope. The nazi SS was trained by jewish jesuits. The average westerner will never realize what happened to them until they get past this Hitler fought the commies, built some roads, put a chicken in every pot and made way for the volkswagon.

    Hitler was a Rothschild, he had 4 body doubles and escaped to Argentina disguised as a catholic priest. Magda Zeitfeld indicates her surgeon father was murdered after performing facial reconstruction on the fuhrer and then his clinic was burned down by the nazis. Yes Hitler made it to Argentina and Merkel is his daughter. (Merkel means mars by the way. She was turned over to the catholic church, who later gave her to a lutheran minister and his jewish wife. They decided they liked it better behind the iron curtain and moved to Germany, but mind you could travel freely and had a car. Then Merkel out of nowhere suddenly becomes the new German Fuhrer doing what daddy could never do, united Europe under Germany and bleed them dry financially.

  5. When I told my 85 year old Father a few weeks ago, that I supported Putin and that I wished that we here in the US could have such a strong and ethical leader, he called me a Communist. I think that my whole family, and all my friends suffers from the same brain washed, delusional state of mind.
    Thank you VT for speaking the truth. As a recovering liberal Democrat, it’s nice to know that I a not completely alone. I come daily to this site for news, I’m not a Veteran and I don’t always agree with everything you write, but I have learned a lot from you VT, Thanks

  6. Americans should note that Solzhenitsyn’s “200 Years Together” mentioned in this article is unavailble in translation only to them. It’s been translated into every other language except English. As regards Masha Geffen’s alleged dual Russian American citizenship, me-thinks there was a slip-up here; more likely it is Israeli-American dual citizenship as under American immigration law only israeli Jews are elligble to simultaneously hold US citizenship.

  7. As regards Masha Geffen’s alleged dual Russian American citizenship, me-thinks there was a slip-up here; more likely it is Israeli-American dual citizenship as under American immigration law only israeli Jews are elligble to simultaneously hold US citizenship.

  8. John, you did not read what I said. The apostates and heretics who occupy the current Vatican, are known freemasons, and known Talmudic Jews, wearing costumes. They are pedophiles, womanizers and sodomites, many of them. They have done this for a thousand years.

  9. It stands to reason that if Cuckservative Inc seeks war with Putin for his Christian nationalism and with Iran for its Islamic nationalism, then cuckservatism (Fox, WSJ, and the GOP) is the enemy of both Christianity and nationalism here and in Western Europe as well. The only difference between them and the Bolsheviks of old is that predatory capitalism has proved far more effective in transferring the means of production into neo-Bolshevik hands and enslavement of labor than their grandparents’ first go at it with communism. Mass murder, cultural and religious genocide, sexual depravity, and other nearly unspeakable crimes against humanity remain their stock in trade, making it hardly surprising that in a country of over 300 million they could only come up with literal scum like Hillary and the cuckservative dwarves to run for president in what are now widely recognized as elections every bit as rigged as under Stalin.

  10. Jonas – great article – but u know that. :-). I’ve learned even more about the current turmoils thru it. Not who’s responsible – knew that for long time now… But other resources to review or read for first time. Thanks mucho! Putin has ranked #1 with me – for some time.

  11. Vladimir Putin is a true statesman who sees right through the NWO and all of their machinations. He offers humanity a better way forward.

    • True, with the values he espouses no decent person in the world can deny it whereas the rest of the leaders in the West are mistaking vices for values and sophistication and hence misleading entire generations astray in their moral blindness.

  12. Why did the Wall Street Journal declare Putin lives in “a fantasy world of international rule”? ..…. through this NWO mouthpiece they reveal their threat…a highly respected Vladimir Putin held in high esteem and seen as more than the President of Russia in an international arena.. None better positioned at the helm in globally moving towards REAL peace in our REAL world….with a backing that would fry their brains…. there are no isolated incidents, the same enemy. “Protected entities” scoff at International Law even as their protective waters are drying up ….. nothing good has ever come from them, reflecting the hideousness of the evil they invoke and then foist upon our planet in continual blood sacrifice …blood on the ground cries out, truth is being heard and has reverberated throughout the universe… all have had enough, the gloves are off

  13. You guys should actually read the book they preach from and do a little research. For example:

    Isaiah 14:12 “How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! [how] art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!”

    In the untranslated Hebrew text, the word used for Lucifer is heylel, and Strong’s Hebrew and Greek Lexicon gives the translation/definition of heylel (H1966 as “the morning-star: lucifer” from H1984 (in the sense of brightness);). Now let’s read a verse from the book of Revelation:

    Revelation 22:16 “I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, [and] the bright and morning star.”

    Instead of using the name Lucifer, that verse gives the definition of Lucifer and Lucifer is none other than the Biblical Jesus. I guess that’s why it’s called Revelation. The Greek words used are orthrinos, (G3720 from G3722; relating to the dawn, i.e. matutinal, as an epithet of Venus, especially brilliant in the early day), and aster, (G792 probably from the base of G4766; a star as strown over the sky, literally or figuratively). Matutinal means as occurring early in the morning.

    All organized religions serve the same dark spirit or they wouldn’t be killing each other. Christians murdered 100 million or so Native Americans, Christians enslaved Africans in the United States, etc. Want to learn more, read (Re)Vision at universal-rights dot com

    • Listen – if you are going to smush Satan / Lucifer / Jesus together as if they are one unit – you need a little deeper understanding. First of all, the use of “Lucifer” to describe the same character as “Satan” in the Bible is a mistake by so-called scholars. “Lucifer” in Isaiah 14:12 is a transliterated word from the Latin Vulgate – not the original Hebrew text – and inserted in the King James translation and many others in a very unscholarly way. The story being recounted by Isaiah is an allegory of the King of Babylon, the “shining one” (who was a legend in his own mind). There are no scriptural connections between Isaiah’s passage and any other so-called “Satan” text or the passage in Revelation 22:16 referring to Jesus. You should study a little more before spewing bile, and your point might be more effective (i.e. rah rah ree ree, evil Christians can’t you see).

    • President Putin has done some good things, for example: Additions to Miscellaneous articles: “Russia Appropriately Jailed Members of Blasphemous Feminist Punk Rock Band,” and the RT piece here: “France ‘double standards’: Prison for Mosque offence, fines for Femen church affront,” by RT [Russian] News

    • John, or whatever your real name is, why don’t you quote from the Talmud’s psychopathological verses, the ones you learned at yeshiva, that match your own blind hatred of Christians? Are you a Sabbatean, by the way?

  14. Russia is back, and with snow on their boots. He makes Western leaders shake in ‘their’ boots. We saw PM Abbott back down when Putin was in Australia after claiming he would ‘shirt front’ the Russian leader.

    While I admire Putin, Russia has now made holohaux denial illegal.
    Why would they do this?
    Especially when it is obvious that it was the jewish Bolsheviks who murdered over 40 million Russians in the 30’s.and brutally murdered the whole royal family, even though they abdicated 3 months before.
    Please explain.

  15. Numerous Granit cruise missiles were pilfered from the sunken Kursk submarine on Putin’s watch.
    One missile was supposedly used on 911 but did not detonate due to a faulty detonator otherwise an entire city would have been incinerated. Whether this fault was an in-built safety feature against the almost zero chance of the missiles falling into hostile hands is immaterial because the fault may have been repaired by now and ready for outrageous.

    That there is a whole chapter that ties Putin, the Kursk submarine, Victor Bout and Khaledov has been hardly mentioned in the net and among the 911 investigators. Of course they may have not played a direct part in the outrage but they were involved in it to a degree according to some credible documents found on the net. Also the sinking of the Kursk itself is questionable and not much other than white-wash explanations exist on the net.

Comments are closed.