Why Russia Could Win the Fight Against ISIL in Syria

6
275

Russian military air group at Khmeimim airbase in Syria

Since the beginning of the air campaign Russian air forces have carried out about 140 strikes against terrorist positions in Syria.

The targets of the airstrikes included command centers, training camps and ammunition depots, with Russian warships in the Caspian Sea having fired 26 cruise missiles on ISIL positions.

The Russian Defense Ministry said that the airstrikes have considerably damaged Islamic State’s command and logistics networks, as well as infrastructure used to equip suicide bombers.According to some analysts the Russian airstrikes in Syria may be more effective than the US-led air campaign for one simple reason: Moscow is in close cooperation with the Syrian ground forces.

“The Western campaign against ISIL has failed because there is no human intelligence there,” Royal United Services Institute analyst Kamal Alam said, speaking at an event held at the Center for the National Interest, “The Russians are going to be more embedded with the Syrians.”

While the US military has a lot of ways to gather intelligence in Iraq and Syria, specific targeting in densely populated areas with civilians present often poses huge challenges for analysts trying to distinguish between friend and foe.

“With no ground units available, Air Force analysts typically depend on the local US embassy in a targeted country. However, in Syria, there is no US diplomatic presence to speak of, while the US embassy in Iraq is located in Baghdad—far away from ISIS-occupied territory. ‘You could have a dialogue with them to get context,” 480th ISR Wing Commander Col. Tim Haugh said. “There is no [Army or Marine] captain on the ground to talk to,” American magazine The National Interest wrote.

Talking about Russian Forces, Paul Saunders, executive director of the Center for the National Interest, said that there is no evidence that Russian special operations forces are on the ground providing targeting data, instead the Russian air force is relying on Syrian troops for intelligence.

He also said, “What they are saying is that they are unique because they have been invited by the Syrian government,” Saunders said. Hence the airstrikes are going to be more effective because they are coordinating with Syrian forces on the ground.

“Overall, the Russians appear to be positioning themselves to influence a negotiated end to the Syrian conflict once they are assured their interests are taken into account,” The National Interest concluded.

Read more: http://sputniknews.com/politics/20151009/1028286146/russia-syria-isil-effective-air-campaign.html#ixzz3o66YzgyQ

About VT Editors
VT Editors is a General Posting account managed by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff. All content herein is owned and copyrighted by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff
DISCLOSURES: All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

6 COMMENTS

  1. I stopped reading after.
    “The Russian air strikes in Syria may be more effective than the US-led air campaign”

  2. Dr. / Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) _____ NO-FLY ZONE IN SYRIA ‘COULD LEAD TO WORLD WAR 3’

     Madam Benghazi / Hillary Clinton & John Kerry raises SYRIA NO-FLY ZONE despite Obama’s skepticism, as if Clinton’s DISASTER in LIBYA that is still in Turmoil was not enough
     Even as Secretary of State, Clinton advocated for ARMING SYRIAN REBELS, that Cost $500M, that TRAINED (4-Rebles), long before anyone else, including VP Joe Biden & Obama AGREED to do so.
     Paul, said the idea floated by several Republican presidential candidates and by Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton, is a “TERRIBLE IDEA” that could “LEAD TO WORLD WAR 3″
    IF ANYONE WAS STUPID ENOUGH TO FOLLOW THROUGH.
     We went 70- YEARS having open channels of communication with the Russians, trying to avoid having one side shoot down the opposite side’s plane.
     I think the people who call for a NO-FLY ZONE ARE NAIVE. Right now, RUSSIA IS actually being INVITED by (2) of the neighboring countries, by IRAQ & SYRIA. We’re going to STOP RUSSIA FROM FLYING IN THE AREA. This gets back to whether we want to diplomatically ISOLATE OURSELVES, or whether we want to diplomatically engage.”

  3. Simple explanation: Russia forces are invited and welcomed by the Syrian government. US, Israel, Saudi, UK, etc forces are invaders for corporate interests, pipelines, oil and greater Israel.

Comments are closed.