Hot off the Press – Netanyahu is a History Revisionist




By Gilad Atzmon

Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has attracted criticism for an incendiary speech in which he accused the Palestinian grand mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, of “inspiring the Holocaust”. Critics accuse Netanyahu of trivialising the Holocaust by attributing the impetus for Hitler’s plan to exterminate the Jews of Europe to the grand mufti.

In his speech Netanyahu described a meeting between Haj Amin al-Husseini and Hitler in November 1941. “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews. And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said: ‘If you expel them, they’ll all come here [to Palestine].’” According to Netanyahu, Hitler then asked: “What should I do with them?” and the mufti replied: “Burn them.” Netanyahu chose not to reveal how he had uncovered the transcript of the conversation.

This shift in Israeli historical perspective, illuminated by Netanyahu, is timely and welcome. In recent days it has become clear that Palestine is not willing to accept the Zionist presence on its land any longer and this feeling is more than understandable. Time is overdue for the Jews to move on and invent a new phantasmic promised land.  Germany is obviously the ideal candidate. Angela Merkel loves immigration and she is probably willing to take a few million Israeli humus eaters to balance the victims of Ziocon wars who are fleeing into her Germanic haven.

Berlin has recently become the new Jerusalem for the Israelis. Thousand of young Israelis have moved to Berlin in recent years in a migration wave that in Hebrew is called, ‘Olim le-Berlin’ (Ascending to Berlin). Yesterday PM Netanyahu joined the call of the Israeli youth, and he has finally vindicated Hitler and the Germans. It seems that actually it is the Palestinians who should be blamed for the Shoah. In the Hebraic sphere they like to keep the equation simple – the eternal victim (the Jew) is the constant factor, the anti-Semite is the variable element. The anti Semite keeps changing, it never stops changing.

Some boring Israeli historians are not yet willing to follow Netanyahu’s revisionist shift. They still insist that maintaining German guilt is essential. Professor Dan Michman, head of the Institute of Holocaust Research at Bar-Ilan University said, “while Hitler did indeed meet the mufti this happened after the Final Solution began.” I am always confused by Jewish scholarship and the way Jewish scholars fiddle with facts to make them fit ever-changing Jewish interests. According to the Zionist Holocaust religion, the “Final solution” was first established in the Wannsee Conference in January 1942. But Hitler met the Mufti in November 1941.

Alternatively, try to follow to the depth of Israeli scholarship. Professor Dina Porat, told the Israeli news website Ynet, that Netanyahu’s claims were “incorrect”.  Her profound argument:  “You cannot say that it was the mufti who gave Hitler the idea to kill or burn Jews. It’s not true. Their meeting occurred after a series of events that point to this.” As I pointed out in ‘The Wandering Who?’, there is no such a thing as Jewish history. Instead its history is the institutional concealment of Jewish shame that results in an unabashed, inconsistent, kosher zigzag.

MK Itzik Shmuli called on Netanyahu to apologise to Holocaust victims.  “This is a great shame, a prime minister of the Jewish state at the service of Holocaust deniers.” Thankfully we now possess a very effective litmus tests for Holocaust deniers. If Netanyahu is the Holocaust denier that MK Shmuli suggests, he will soon express his support for Jeremy Corbyn and our revolutionary Labour party. I am not actually holding my breath.


Comments Closed


  1. And so it was, that I, as a strong swimming sperm, convinced my contact at my fathers central nervous system, to send the message to my fathers brain that he must convince my mother to have a child.
    This testi-mony proves that it was my idea, and not my fathers, as has been widely suggested.

  2. The reason is most likely because the whole thing is a concoction. Otherwise the story would remain the same, yet it changes akin to the direction of the wind. It’s sickening to say the very least. People die in wars, especially those fought before a rapid source of broadcast, like twitter, or the web etc. This idea that people were herded up, rounded up in large groups and burned, or gassed, or other……has no real foundation to stand on. It was war, and as things unfold, it looks to be a case of manipulated events that have been accepted as actual history. I thought this was solid, like concrete, obviously it has cracks large enough to drive a truck thru.


  3. Let me take a shot at the liar of Tel Aviv
    Let us grant Lyin-yahoo, for the sake of argument, that the mufti wanted I final solution to rid him of Palestine’s Jewish Question. We all know that it was the Khazari Bolshevic Zionists Jews that invaded Palestine. But we also know that the Sephardic Jews lived with the Arabs in Palestine for centuries without any major issue. We also know that the majority of Jews exterminated were the Sephardic Jews. So why would the mufti want to exterminate the Sephardic Jews who were his good neighbors while the the real plague was the Khazari Bolshevic Zionists Jews who are the real force behind the holocaust.

Comments are closed.