A Tale Of Two Kingdoms – Israel and Judea

“he will raise the people and confirm that his word and law are standing”

…by  Katherine Frisk

Map_12_tribes_division-of-promised-land-to-ancient-israelI am going to ask you the reader to stick with me here and follow my train of thought. This has less to do with “sky daddy” and more to do with land rights and title deeds. So please bear with me. But… we need to take a number of steps to get to the 21st century. So here is a basic overview.

We have a nation founded by one Joshua/Yeshua. This nation consists of 12 tribes each designated their own territory based on the twelve sons of Jacob/Israel. Joshua inherits the title of leader through his grandfather Ephraim who was blessed by Jacob/Israel as the firstborn.

Israel is united by a common bond, the Covenant. According to the Covenant they should have no king but God. So a monarchy is not part of the political system because a king is regarded as a form of an idol.

They were to be ruled by a Judiciary and as I repeatedly point out, one of the first judges of Israel was a woman. Deborah. In poetic and symbolic language she becomes Wisdom, Sophia, Proverbs 8. The bride of the law.

Included in this Covenant are three important commandments. Thou shalt not steal. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours possessions. Thou shalt not kill. These are the foundation stones of Israel.

The three commandments also apply to other nations. Where they should not covert the territory of other nations, steal from them or kill them. The only time killing is permissible is in self-defense. And obviously they should not worship foreign gods, that would include kings of other nations who even up until the 20th century regarded themselves as “gods”with a divine right to rule.

But… Israel broke the Covenant. (Read 1 Samuel 8.) They demanded a king. This is why all the prophets in their writings accuse them of being harlots. The population as a whole in analogy is seen as the bride of the law. The Covenant. By demanding a king they commit adultery and abandon their husband the Lord.

The result is that the nation is split in two. The Kingdom of Judea, with the tribes Judah designated as king and Levi the priesthood; and the Kingdom of Israel, the ten tribes with a descendant of Joshua, of the tribe of Ephraim designated as king and a descendant of Manasseh the priesthood.

Map_Israel_Judah_kingdoms-of-ancient-israel-and-judah

Both kingdoms committed idolatry simply by instituting a monarchy. Both in effect worshiped idols. The population in both kingdoms became harlots and idolaters.

However, the kings of Judea wanted to have hegemonic control over all of Israel and Jerusalem as the centre of control. The northern tribes on the other hand, saw Mount Gerizim as the centre where Joshua had dedicated them to the Covenant and where there was no temple.

The temple was the heavens, hence the celebration of the feast of booths, Sukkot, where they were to live in these open air booths on the mountain for seven days in order to observe the heavens. The true temple.

Now here comes the rub. Due to the laws, thou shalt not covert thy neighbours’ possessions, thou shalt not steal and thou shalt not kill, the Judeans could not overtly attack the Northern Kingdom and subjugate their brothers to their will. So they took the next best option.

The covert option. Get somebody else to do it for them. A proxy army. They cut a deal with the Assyrians that they would not help to protect the north, and in their misguided perception, believed that they could in time take over the whole of Israel with the Assyrian’s aid.

When the Hebrews from the north fled south for safety, the Judeans treated them like slaves, a slavery from which the Hebrews escaped and fled to Egypt along with the prophet Jeremiah where tradition has him visiting the old city of Cairo.

Judea had in effect become a fascist state. They broke the Covenant on almost every single level. Their objective was Judaic dominance where all other tribes would be subjected to their will, deprived of their land, denied due process and subjected to slavery.

This was completely contrary to Yeshuas/Joshua’s federated democracy of 12 tribes ruled by a judiciary comprised not only of women, but of representatives of all twelve tribes.

We know the results. Judea was eventually invaded and the Judeans were taken to Babylon in captivity. The Hebrews on the other hand were scattered both in the west in Egypt and in the east in Iran and Kashmir. Here are some quotes:

Isaiah 11:13 And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.The envy also of Ephraim shall depart, and the adversaries of Judah shall be cut off: Ephraim shall not envy Judah, and Judah shall not vex Ephraim.

Jeremiah 50:4-5 – In those days, and in that time, saith the LORD, the children of Israel shall come, they and the children of Judah together, going and weeping: they shall go, and seek the LORD their God.They shall ask the way to Zion with their faces thitherward, saying, Come, and let us join ourselves to the LORD in a perpetual covenant that shall not be forgotten.

Ezekiel 37:16-25- I will take the stick of Joseph, which is in the hand of Ephraim, and the tribes of Israel his fellows, and will put them with him, even with the stick of Judah, and make them one stick, and they shall be one in mine hand.And the sticks whereon thou writest shall be in thine hand before their eyes.And say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will take the children of Israel from among the heathen, whither they be gone, and will gather them on every side, and bring them into their own land

As far as the prophets were concerned, when Israel, all twelve tribes were to be restored in the future, the law should no longer be dictated to them by hegemonic kings or high priests, in a top down hierarchical system, but was to be integrated within the hearts and the minds of Israel in order that no fascist dictatorship should ever arise again resulting in the destruction of the nation. The New Covenant was that the law should be internalized.

The bride, the people were to have a wedding feast with the law in their hearts. From a religious perspective, direct knowledge of God, not indirect through a priest. A contemporary example of this would be a Constitution and a Bill of Rights. Jeremiah:

“Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah—  not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, though I was a husband to them, says the Lord. But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put My law in their minds, and write it on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people.”

Palestine_1_AD_palestineFast forward to the 1st century A.D. The Judeans had resettled in Judea, built a Temple, installed kings of the Herodian Edomite / Levite line and elicited the help of a proxy Roman army to maintain control over the whole of Israel, now known as Palestine.

All of the Herodian kings grew up in Rome, were educated in Rome and had close relationships including marriage with the nobility of the Roman Empire.

Again, Judea had in effect become a fascist state. They broke the Covenant on almost every single level. Their objective was Judaic dominance where all other tribes would be subjected to their will, deprived of their land, denied due process and subjected to Temple Babylonian usury slavery through the help of the Roman proxy army.

Again this was completely contrary to Yeshuas/Joshua’s federated democracy of 12 tribes ruled by a judiciary comprised not only of women, but of representatives of all twelve tribes where usury was denounced.

A civil war ensued. The Hebrews had also returned to what was once known as the Northern Kingdom, had no temple, refused to pay homage to the Herodian Kings and saw the Roman Legion as evil invaders of their country. The tax collectors and the money lenders at the temple were a scourge on their lives. These people are referred to by the Judaens as “gentiles,” they were the Samaritans, Galileans and the Essenes.

They extended from the Jordan, Bethal, Samaria, Galilee and north into what is now Syria including Damascus. These Hebrews had more in common with the Greeks and their concept of democracy than they had with the Romans and their emperors who regarded themselves as Gods. As a result, early Christianity was more accepted in the east than it was in the west and Damascus became one of the centres of the earliest Christian churches.

Central to the gospels are the differing religious views between the Judeans and the Hebrews. The four most important are:

  1. God can raise up children unto Abraham even from these stones. Whereas the Jews believed that only the tribe of Judah and their bloodline could be regarded as children of God.

  2. The accused is entitled to a just and fair trial with witnesses to speak on their behalf. The Sanhedrin only allowed accusational witnesses, a trial by ordeal.

  3. Israel should be re-instated as Joshua had done centuries before and re-dedicate all of Israel to the Covenant. That means all 12 tribes. Not hegemony under the tribe of Judah. The twelve Apostles are representative of all twelve tribes.

Now we come to the trial of one Jesus. This trial was a mistrial. He had committed no crime. He was held in detention, falsely accused and put before both Herod and the Roman proxy war Legion Pontius Pilate. The Sanhedrin could not condemn him to death simply because they had no evidence and he had not broken any laws. So, back to the covert means, get somebody else to do it for them. Pilate.

But what was the real threat that the High Priests of the Temple and the Herod Kings were afraid of? It was simply that Jesus/Joshua, would convince the Romans of the Hebrews, being the ten tribes, right to the titles deeds of the Northern Kingdom. And what is more, that he would get a substantial following amongst the people themselves.

This would be a threat to Judaic hegemony over all of Palestine. If the proxy army of the Romans changed sides and were convinced of their laws, their Covenant and the right to the land, they would switch sides in which case, this statement by Caiaphas is accurate:

The chief priests therefore and the Pharisees gathered a council, and said, “What are we to do? For this man is doing many signs. If we let him alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans will come and take away both our place and our nation” (John 11:47-48).

As happened in the past, the very same proxy army that the Judeans had used to achieve their aims, were the same proxy army that finally brought down the destruction of the Temple and the Judeans once again, returned to Babylon. History repeats.

In the following centuries two different commentaries on the Torah were written. The one we are all familiar with, the Babylonian Talmud. This Talmud takes a decidedly Judaic bias and not surprisingly has Jesus boiling in faeces for all eternity.

But there is another one, little spoken about and mostly unknown. It is the Palestinian Talmud, written by Palestinian Rabbis in Galilee and is the older of the two. It is called the Jerusalem Talmud even though it did not originate in Jerusalem and the Rabbis who wrote it did not live there. Parts of it are “missing” which is not surprising, and from approximately 400 A.D it became largely unknown with the latter Babylonian Talmud taking precedence in Jewish communities.

Whenever it has re-emerged throughout history, those with a Judean bias have always taken the word of the Babylonian Talmud over and above the Palestinian Talmud. At the time of its writing +-200 A.D – 400 A.D. there was much disagreement between the two schools. As there is today between the Torah Jews and the Zionist Jews. Go back and we see the same acrimony between the Kingdom of Judea and the Northern kingdom of Israel

I have never read either of them, however in the last week after discovering the existence of the latter, which is older and dates from earlier than the Babylonian Talmud I hit the internet looking for references to one Yeshua/Joshua/Jesus.

Yeshua is briefly mentioned in both Talmuds. What appears to be the case in both, is that the story of his trial is an attempt by the authors to justify an unjust trial and death sentence. In other words, to clear the High Priest and the Sanhedrin of breaking their own laws. The main accusations against him are sorcery and that he was leading  Israel astray.

The Theraputea, the Essenes and Jesus were well-known for their medical knowledge and their ability to heal others which from an uneducated point of view, would be regarded a magic, or sorcery. Centuries later during the Middle Ages, herbalists with the same knowledge were burnt to death at the stake for being witches by the Inquisition and people like Galileo were damned to purgatory for their knowledge of astronomy. Not surprisingly as with the trial of Jesus by the Sanhedrin, “The judge, or inquisitor, could bring suit against anyone.

The accused had to testify against himself/herself and not have the right to face and question his/her accuser, ” even though these judges professed to be Christians. In the 21st Century we have the same scourge in the world with CIA black sites where people are held in detention without trial, accused, tortured and often “suicided.” Windows in the top floors of buildings seem to be fashionable.

As for the latter accusation, legally speaking and in accordance with the Torah, the Covenant and Samuel 1 :8, inciting Israel not to support the teachings of the Pharisees and the Sadducees, in fact being told to beware of them, rejecting the Herodian monarchy and the proxy Roman army, was not a crime or even against the Torah. It was certainly not heresy or apostasy.

Nor was it politically incorrect. Inciting Israel to return, inciting the bride, the people to abandon harlotry and a monarchy, reinstating the Covenant, is totally in keeping with restoring Israel as Yeshua/Joshua intended it. The very foundation of the nation itself. A new covenant that would be written in their hearts and minds and where they would love one another, all the twelve tribes of Israel as Jeremiah had predicted. Direct knowledge of God, through the Holy Spirit, not indirect knowledge through a priest

I strongly suspect that the Palestinian Talmud, should it be made public in its entirety, could very well clear up a lot of unanswered questions and a lot of acrimony that exists in the world today. The Hebrews, the Northern tribe, Israel, are not only to be found in Palestine and Syria, but have spread throughout the world and are in all nations, all races and all religions. The twelve have become as numerous as the stars in the sky.

In the 21st Century we find history repeating again. The Zionist state (Judea) has supported proxy armies like Daesh on the Golan Heights and in Syria, in order to overthrow Assad and take over complete control of Syria and create greater Israel from the Sinai to the Euphrates River.

In other words, a repeat of the covert proxy army maneuvers during the Assyrian invasion and the proxy Roman army occupation during the 1st century A.D. Therefore, according to their law, their hands are clean and they have not committed a crime. Somebody else has yet again done the dirty work for them as the Assyrians and the Romans did in the past.

And again as I have pointed out in numerous articles, the Palestinians and the Syrians, Samaritans, Torah Jews, Orthodox Christians and Muslims are the descendants of the Hebrews of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, the 10 tribes of Israel, of the Joseph tribes, of Ephraim, Joshua and Yeshua.

Palestine_jews_stealing_palestine

Judea (the Zionist State) has no right or title-deed to this land. Not during the Assyrian invasion, the Roman occupation or the current holocaust that has been conducted in northern Iraq and Syria in the 21st century. Or the occupied territories of the West Bank and the Golan Heights.

In order to attack the Palestinians on the West Bank and the Gaza strip they have to prove that THEY are being attacked. So for the last 70 years they have used covert means to prove that they are not the aggressor and are therefore defending themselves.

I heard a story, cannot remember where exactly about a Palestinian taxi driver who had been employed to pick up a passenger at a certain point, given a cell phone and told to call a certain number when he got there so that the passenger knew that he was there to pick him up.

When he got there he could not get a signal so he moved to the corner of the street, when he dialed the number the taxi blew up. That is but one example of “Palestinian terrorism.” This covert operation in turn then gives the Zionist State the excuse they need to arrest, torture and kill Palestinains.

But the real issue is that the land on the West Bank and the Golan Heights, and the land stretching to the Euphrates is not their promised land, the whole of Israel was not promised to the Jews/Judah. Israel was promised to 12 tribes of which Judah is only one. And these 12 tribes live on in the blood lines of the families who now live in Palestine and Syria.

This is the third time in history that the same play book is being carried out. This is the third time that Judea (Zionist State) has used covert means and proxy armies to achieve a hegemonic kingdom and where they believe that a Messiah David will come to rule not only over them, but the whole world.

I still believe, rightly or wrongly, time will tell, that Jesus, Yeshua, was not from the tribe of Judah and was not descended from David. I believe that any and all references in the New Testament have been later insertions for political reasons and in order to maintain the concept of a monarchy as a ruling political system as opposed to a federated democracy.

A Republic with a multi-polar judiciary. Yeshua was not the king of the Jews. A accusation he denies. He was the “son of God,” in so much as he was a direct descendant of Ephraim, blessed as the firstborn of the Lord in Jeremiah 31. As such his father was called Joseph. He calls himself the son of Man and the son of God, as we are all children of God. No more and no less.

In the Gospels, Yeshua himself is tempted by the Devil with all the kingdoms of the world and rejects the offer. To believe that in a second coming, should such an event occur, that he would change his mind or forsake the Covenant is doubtful to say the least.

I end with a cryptic note left by Rabbi Yitzhak Kaduri. Within the note he has embedded the name Yeshua. I am willing to bet he was a fan of the Palestinian Talmud. But that like many things, remains to be revealed at some point in the future.

ירים העם ויוכיח שדברו ותורתו עומדים” (translated as “he will raise the people and confirm that his word and law are standing”), which by acronym, suggested the name “Yehoshua”


Katherine Frisk is a freelance writer, political commentator and author of Jesus Was A Palestinian.


Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:



All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within this post are the full responsibility of the author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on December 6, 2015, With 7271 Reads Filed under Investigations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

25 Responses to "A Tale Of Two Kingdoms – Israel and Judea"

  1. rockwool  December 11, 2015 at 2:15 pm

    Fantastic article and analysis in seeing how the establishment of Judea and Neo-judea use proxie armies to subdue the other ten tribes – which consequentially equals humanity.

    Also, that the zionists (infact all occult elites) play by the same rules today as exemplified through that the zios have to proove that they are “attacked” to justify their Goliathan violence – “big” in form, but more importantly, unrighteous in essence.

    On Yeshua’s genealogy and rearing the author must read this:
    https://ia700401.us.archive.org/10/items/TheRevelationsOfAnEliteFamilyInsider2005/TheRevelationsOfAnEliteFamilyInsider2005.pdf

    ….Yehoshua is not unsimilar to Yahweh and I wonder about their etymological affiliation.

  2. rockwool  December 11, 2015 at 1:19 pm

    QUOTE:
    ‘The accused had to testify against himself/herself and not have the right to face and question his/her accuser’.

    This is how it functions under Liberal law as well, as soon as you open your mouth (and that’s why You must never EVER speak to the police because they practiacally start an investigation immediatelly).

    The function of the prosecutor is literally as that of the biblical accuser – Satan (Diablolos = the one who smears Dias; the most high).

  3. rockwool  December 11, 2015 at 12:30 pm

    QUOTE:
    ‘The New Covenant was that the law should be internalized [in their hearts and minds]’.

    This is exactly what the New Age movement does for there can be no new worldly order without a New Age Order, the two have ruled together forever with the help of the Army – the Trinity also Marx pointed out through his dialectic historical materialism.

    The New Age Order tells its followers not to think but only to feel, with the consequence that any “rainy” subject gets waived off by them – they have only sunshine in heart and mind while humanity is dying.

    Michel Foucault showed that there has been two major (and one smaller) semantical “hijackings” were words had their meaning (satanically) turned up-side-down:
    1. The small one was noticeable with the start of the monastery practice.
    2. The first big one was with the introduction of the Mercantilist ideas in the 1500’s.
    3. The second big one was by the Ordo Liberals of the Freiburg School in the 1920’s and continued by the Chicago School in the 50’s.

    (BTW, the Neocon ideology is literally Neoliberal, it’s from the same school)

    The NWO and New Age Order are now well into this 3rd semantical change of the ontology but they have taken it to a new dimension where they subdue all future enemies not only semantically but through biopolitics – internalization.

    • rockwool  December 11, 2015 at 1:45 pm

      QUOTE:
      ‘Direct knowledge of God, through the Holy Spirit, not indirect knowledge through a priest’.

      This is exactly what the New Age Order hooks its followers with, and December 21, 2012 was the new years “eve” of the old equinox (25920 years, of which the latter half has negative energy) and when the energies were the strongest due to planetary allignment.

      The reason the establishment down-played 12-21-12 was so that as few as possible would be aware of this and thus not be able to “ride the beam” of positive energy.

      “He (Satan) only has a short time” probably partially because of this energy shift, and the Neocons call it The Long War (also known as The Seventy Year War) where humanity is to be wiped out and tops 500 million left. Tops, according to the Georgia Guidstones.

      Knowledge through the Holy Spirit = being able to visualize through ones Pineal Gland (Third Eye); being able to “tap into” the Cosmic Truth (that’s why Truth is objective and not subjective).

      As an analogy it can be understood as the difference between the Lacanean Real compared to reality, as a (secular) similar.

  4. Katherine Frisk  December 8, 2015 at 1:47 am

    Tell me Thomas, do you have a brain? DO you actually have ANY thoughts of your own? Or are you just a copy and paste artist? The Bible is not written by one person, neither the Old Testament nor the New. And each author has their own view and bias I might add.It is up to you to actually use your own brain and think for yourself. Knock yourself out with all your copy and paste. I am going outside to enjoy the planet that God gave us.

  5. Katherine Frisk  December 7, 2015 at 6:05 pm

    You are very foolish.

  6. jonnbrown  December 7, 2015 at 11:44 am

    Katherine: to get to the bottom of this “land rights and title deeds” – you must stop looking at the middle east for the Tribes of Israel. Although there are M.E. nations, as I believe you’ve pointed out, that have more Israelite blood (Palestine, Syria) than those Khazar / Edomite impostors, the bulk of the tribes left that region a long, long time ago.

    As in the story of the Two Sticks – BOTH HOUSES of Israel and Judah must be together in order that ALL of the tribes SHARE the birthright commonly. When the Northern Kingdom of Israel was taken in the Assyrian captivity, the “birthright” tribe under Joseph’s sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, were no longer in the “promised land,” and gradually things fell apart.

    But this all happened because God had promised a multitude of seed to all three patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac, and paring it down to Jacob, eliminating Esau’s descendants. So in the master plan, the Tribes could not stay in a country the size of Rhode Island and fulfill any resemblance of that destiny.

    As Josephus stated,
    “…there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while the ten tribes are beyond Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers.” Antiquities: 11:5:2

    Go to an old map of Assyria, and it’s not hard to see where this is. But then, they left and most never returned to the region, migrating westward – an IMMENSE MULTITUDE.

    • jonnbrown  December 7, 2015 at 12:12 pm

      I’ll only add one more thought – not meaning to question what you are trying to do here, but, it’s kinda intellectually dishonest to ignore what Jacob also says to his son Judah regarding his role as “lawgiver” holding the scepter among the tribes. Genesis 49:8-12.

      And I think it’s obvious you are doing this because you wish to remove any association of “Messiah” / Yahshua with “Judah” because of the impostors. So I understand. Correct me if I am wrong.

      But there is no need to go down that “Jesus-was-of Joseph-not-David-Judah” trail. I have read those assertions for about 30 years and perceive everyone who claims this has done so for the same reasons as what I think you are, even stretching it to the point of using Edgar Cayce’s readings on the subject to prove it. (which is simply a misunderstanding of what Cayce was saying in allegorical terms).

      Find out where the dna / blood is – en masse – and you’ll find where the birthright and blessings are, and note that they are surely the most stiffnecked people on the face of the earth. And it is certainly not those related to modern day Jews greater than the 5% mark. That’s why the 95% wish to enslave or destroy the actual bloodlines of the “endeared” children of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. (i.e the TEKNON [Gr]).

    • Katherine Frisk  December 7, 2015 at 5:55 pm

      The Torah Jews, Orthodox Christians and the Samaritans who live live in Israel, Palestine, Syria and I might add Iran, would disagree with you. There is a very strong Jewish presence in Iran and has been since the Assyrian invasion. And one no less than Isaiah saw the Persian (Iranian) Cyrus the Great as THE Messiah because it was Cyrus who enabled them to return. They are still there today and have been for the last 2,000 years. Many Christians (Hebrews) in Syria, Palestine and Egypt in the last 1,000 years converted to Islam. To both Shiite and Sunni Islam. Israel has been scattered to the four corners of the earth, remember in those days they had 10 – 12 children each. Not like today. So keep that in mind. As many who were scattered had returned by 300 B.C. We hear about the “Jews” and they are all clumped into one basket, where the “Hebrews” are conveniently forgotten. Even today they are all called Jews, a word derived from Judah. So in the very word Jew for all 12 tribes what we have is a lingustic cover up of the existence of the 10 tribes which the “Jews”to this day declare are “lost.” They are not lost and never were. And that needs to be made very clear. They are alive and well in the ME and around the world. THAT is the point. Look at this for instance, even though these people can be traced to Ephraim they are referred to as “Jews.” I have a problem with that. They are not Jews, ie Judah, they are Hebrews. http://www.freemaninstitute.com/Gallery/lemba.htm

    • Katherine Frisk  December 7, 2015 at 6:02 pm

      And I am not being intellectually dishonest. Go back to Genesis. Firstly Jacob overlooks his 12 sons and blesses his Grandson Ephraim as his firstborn. Secondly Judah is only given the scepter until Shiloh comes. When did Shiloh come? Shiloh came when Joshua led the 12 tribes into the promised land and founded a new nation. Shiloh was the first capital and where the Ark was kept. Job done. mission accomplished. Then compare the blessing of Jacob on Judah to his blessings on Joseph. Joseph is the corner stone, he wears the crown, he is the branch, he is the vine. All symbols associated with Yeshua. But the focus is always but on Judah and his scepter, never on Joseph. If you want to call that dishonest, then you need to have a chat with the author of Genesis.

    • Katherine Frisk  December 7, 2015 at 6:31 pm

      And then lastly, there are the Ashkenazi Jews, of European descent very few of whom have any blood ties to any of the 12 tribes. They are converts and comprise a large majority of the “Jews”today in the Zionist State. And they sure were not promised the land from the Nile to the Euphrates river by God. And they have displaced the legal title owners on the land in the West bank and on the Golan Heights who have more right by inheritance than they do. So this is basically land theft. And as I said this is the third time in history that the same game plan is being carried out. For comparative studies look at Isaiah 17 the Dead Sea Scrolls version and Jeremiah, the end result is not pretty. The very proxy armies they used in the past, twice, were the same proxy armies that turned around and destroyed them.

  7. Katherine Frisk  December 6, 2015 at 10:55 pm

    Historical record. See my response to damhippie above.:)

  8. Katherine Frisk  December 6, 2015 at 10:48 pm

    I believe Yeshua said bless those who curse you. You should be very careful when you curse someone. Curses are like lies. They are bent, not straight. And being bent they are in the shape of a boomerang. And being in the shape of a boomerang they return to sender. It is not wise to curse anyone.

  9. Serenity  December 6, 2015 at 10:47 pm

    Katherine, I continue to learn so much from your erudite writing & just finished reading your fascinating book “Jesus Was A Palestinian”. I hope you will grace us with another, especially about the “Story of the Teachers of Righteousness” in the Dead Sea Scrolls. I often wondered about the intrigue behind the long delay in revealing the contents of the Scrolls to the public…

    • Katherine Frisk  December 6, 2015 at 11:11 pm

      One day maybe lol. Right now I am too busy ! We got oil thieves to track down right? Thank you for supporting me and “Jesus Was A Palestinian.” Much appreciated.

  10. Well Aware  December 6, 2015 at 10:34 pm

    Douglas Reed’s book “the Controversy of Zion” explains it all-it’s one long nightmare.

  11. Katherine Frisk  December 6, 2015 at 10:08 pm

    As I have pointed out in other articles and many researchers have done copious amounts of work in this area, the OT is a compilation of many different views, it was never a book. Hence the differing opinions and contradictions. Stories and texts like the 10 commandments, proverbs psalms etc were taken from Egyptian material, other material was adapted from Babylon and put into a Hebrew context. Even battles that were historically fought by other tribes have been attributed to David and the current concensus is that the first temple was never built. They cannot find any evidence for it and that he was not a “king”but a tribal minor chief. The same goes for the NT only compiled in 300 A.D with much cherry picking as to which texts stayed and which did not. Bethlehem was deserted in 1 A.D. but Bethlehem in the north near Nazareth was a thriving city. The reason for the change in location should be obvious. But that all gets too complicated, so for this purposes of this article I have restricted it to basic property with maps.

  12. ayelyahbenjamin  December 6, 2015 at 7:57 pm

    “Israel was promised to 12 tribes of which Judah is only one”…Israel as a people, descendents of Jacob, who gave written specific instructions for the division of land into separate parcels for each tribe….Jerusalem was included in the land parcel inheritance for Benjamin, the youngest son of Rachel and only full blood brother of Joseph, Jacobs great love he was tricked by Rachels father Laban into servitude for 14 years just for her hand in marriage … Jerusalem has always been key and they took it through Saul, who was plucked from the crowd of Benjaminites, for his stature, he ran and hid, reluctantly being appointed and “anointed” by the “priestly”…. well they gave him 2 years before they pounce… in walks gay boy David with the star of Remphan in hand… the seal of Solomon…the star of David, the “Israeli” flag …. This is behind it, where and how it entered into the camp, through Laban who made a covenant with a thoroughly deceived Jacob…Laban was not the half brother of Abraham, Book of Jasher – Chapter 30: 40-44 ( for the naysayers 2 Samuel 1:18, Joshua 10:13)
    we are all children of God, not all grow into Sons…that is what we’re here for

    • Katherine Frisk  December 6, 2015 at 11:07 pm

      I think there is more to the story of Benjamin than we have been told. Perhaps this is a real key. Where Jerusalem belongs to him, not Judah. I do not believe for one minute the Benjamites “disappeared.” It was Judah who sold Joseph into slavery in Egypt, it was more profitable than his first intention which was to kill him. And it was Judah who took Joseph’s brother Benjamin’s property. Stolen basically. Some researchers have concluded that David poisoned Saul and killed Johnathan. Then installed himself as king. Then he had Bathsheba’s husband killed in battle. Something I picked up which very few researchers mention, is that in the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Habbukuk text, where Righteousness is key to the whole belief system as it is in the Wisdom of Solomon, and a list of the Righteous going back in history is given, David is excluded, emphatically. These texts were written 1B.C – 1A.D. The implications are to say the least, quite earth shattering.

    • Katherine Frisk  December 6, 2015 at 11:20 pm

      I like this comment : “we are all children of God, not all grow into Sons…that is what we’re here for”
      In psychology terms, many people have what you would call “arrested development,” in other words they grow intellectually and spiritually to a certain point and stay there for the rest of their lives. Their physical age for example might be 50, but their mental and spiritual IQ is only capable of developing to age 15. Yo see a lot of this in the comments section. 🙂

  13. SterlingJ  December 6, 2015 at 3:03 pm

    DaveE, The comments on Katherine’s prior article, Who Moved The Stone, provide Scriptural evidence of how to dismantle the Zionist “chosenite” myth, as well as Biblical reasons why the false “jews” are not promised the “land”, nor have any claim to supremacy.

    The Biblical and Historical record WILL unseat these usurpers!

  14. SterlingJ  December 6, 2015 at 2:13 pm

    Katherine I noticed you updated this article. You are still not reporting the Biblical narrative accurately. Isn’t anyone fact checking what you’re publishing here?
    Where’s Jonas Alexis when we need him?

    You have no Scriptural legs to stand on when you ignore the testimony of the New Testament, because the Old Testament prophesied and expected the New. By ignoring the New Testament fulfillment of the Old, you are begging the question by presenting only the evidence to support your fanciful, superficial narrative.
    Whether you believe the Biblical narrative or not, misrepresenting it is not a strong position from which to impact the millions of Evangelical/”christian”Zionists who have been mesmerized into supporting the false, distorted Zionist agenda.

    You still have not gotten a hold of the Scriptural understanding that opposes Zionism. The modern state of “Israel” is NOT Biblical Israel! Unbelieving Biblical Israel went up in flames in the AD 70 holocaust of Jerusalem, NEVER to rise again!
    The only thing that made Old Covenant Israel a “nation” was her Covenant with God. The Old Covenant passed away in AD 70. No Covenant = No nation.

    • SterlingJ  December 6, 2015 at 2:30 pm

      The ME state that calls itself “Israel” is an imposter! There are no jews today: “Those who call themselves jews, but are not are the synagogue of satan”, Revelation 2:9, 3:9. Without genealogical records, which were destroyed in the Ad 70 destruction of the Temple, no one can prove they are a jew. To be Israel they must have 12 Tribes. No one can trace their lineage to any of the Tribes. So the impersonators today are tribeless tribes masquerading as “jews” and “Israel”.

      The “land” promised is not physical, literal real estate! Romans 4:13, Hebrews 11:10,16.

      The “land” promised to the heirs of Abraham is inherited only by those who are In Christ, because the OT promise was made exclusively and solely to the “SEED”, who is Christ, Galatians 3.

      Maybe you should understand the comments on your prior article (The Stone) regarding the Biblical definitions of “Two Israels” and “Two Jerusalems”.

    • SterlingJ  December 6, 2015 at 2:54 pm

      Katherine, why are you supporting the Futurist/Zionist doctrine that Jesus’ Return, His promised Parousia is still in the future? Zionists have worked for centuries trying to hide what really happened in the holocaust of AD 70 when the judaic/Old Covenant system was destroyed. The New Testament record indisputably points to Jesus’ Return in AD 70. The evidence of His Return in AD 70 is woven tighter than a drum through the Biblical narrative from Genesis to Revelation!

      Futurism is THE Zionist perversion and hijacking of the Biblical narrative which has intoxicated the world and positioned them to enslave the world.

      Restoring the Biblical Truth about how AD 70 changed everything, is the Scriptural strategy that stands in direct opposition to Zionism, and has both Biblical AND Historical evidence to strip Zionism of any legitimacy!

      Your article has given us no traction in the Theological battle against Zionism…

    • SterlingJ  December 6, 2015 at 5:04 pm

      Hey T Mitchell! Nice to see you again! I agree with you, it would be nice to be challenged with real exegetical analysis.

      The word’s out though, more people are combing through their Bibles to “see if this be so.” So many that I run into are so hungry for the Truth, tired of the pablum and Zionist distortions.

      I appreciate your comments, that you care enough to get involved!

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network