US Military Outclasses Russia in Corruption


U.S Air Force aircraft at Sheik Isa, Bahrain, file photo.

In spite of prevailing clichés about corruption in Russia being out of control, the scale of the scourge is of an incomparably larger scale in the United States, according to independent journalist Einar Schlereth. In the journalist’s view, nowhere is this more obvious than in the case of the US military industrial complex.

In his article, published in popular Austrian news blog Neopresse, Schlereth suggested that if in Russia, corruption and bribery generally have a ‘bottom-up’ nature, in the US, it is a phenomenon which is inherent to the highest levels of political power.

Schlereth begins his analysis by recalling a recent articleby respected American historian F. William Engdahl, in which Engdahl suggested that in many areas, Russian military capabilities have proven to be ‘at least equal’ to those of the US, despite having a tenth of the Pentagon’s budget. Some estimates, the Schlereth notes, “suggest that the United States is less corrupt than Russia.”

But in reality, the journalist suggests, Washington is just able to hide its own corruption better than the Russians. The fundamental difference, the journalist suggests, is that “in the US, corruption is more concentrated at the top, whereas in Russia, it comes from below.”

Furthermore, “with regard to corruption in expenditures for the military,” the journalist argues, “the scale of corruption in the US is simply gigantic, and certainly far worse than it is in Russia.” A May 2014 headline by official US DOD organ Stars and Stripes is telling, Schlereth says, with its suggestion that ‘Decades later, military still unable to account for its spending’.

“Nearly three decades after US taxpayers gasped over $640 toilet seats and other Cold War military waste, the Department of Defense remains the last federal department still unable to conduct a financial audit despite laws passed in the 1990s that require the accounting,” Stars and Stripes then commented.

“In other words,” Schlereth notes, “the US military has turned into a black hole, into which billions of taxpayer dollars have disappeared, without any clear evidence on how, when, and to whom the money went.”

“The fact is that the US government now subcontracts almost everything out to private companies (who collectively spend billions lobbying Congress and funding political campaigns), and this is particularly true when it comes to the Pentagon.”Many of these companies, the journalist warned, have concentrated so much power that they have access to the White House, able to influence the president on how much military aid to give country x, or when and when not to go to war. And the Supreme Court’s recent decision, via Citizens United, allowing unlimited campaign contributions from corporations and organizations, “has only greased the process further along.”

“Russia’s system of military spending,” Schlereth suggests, “is the diametric opposite of America’s. While the United States has privatized their military industry, in Russia it is in state hands. All profits from arms sales go to the Russian government, not to the makers or the multinationals. The arms manufacturers are [effectively] part of the government.”

“Just like in the US, there are is no financial accounting of their operations, but there are financial reports reviewed each year by the defense minister and, moreover, by the president and the prime minister –i.e. by people who are responsible to the electorate, and not only to the aristocracy of large shareholders.”

“In the US,” Schlereth notes, “there is no financial accounting. Instead (as per aristocratic preference) dollars flow to American politicians’ election campaigns.” Effectively, the journalist suggests, “war profits are private and the buying of politicians becomes just another business expense.”

Ultimately, Schlereth says, “Russia receives much more for its military rubles –that’s for sure. And as the White House increasingly attempts to strangle Russia, not only economically but militarily as well, this overlooked component of America’s huge corruption comes more and more into the spotlight, unlike the financial operations behind it.


DISCLOSURES: All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy
[the_ad id="510264"]


  1. On Sept. 10, 2001 Donald Rumsfeld announced that $2.3 trillion was missing from Pentagon accounts, then under the stewardship of Rabbi Dov Zakheim. On Sept. 11, 2001 the records of the investigation, and most of the personnel involved, were destroyed when the Pentagon was struck by…something highly explosive. Since that time, an additional $6 trillion or so has apparently gone missing, and again Rabbi Dov Zakheim’s name was mentioned in connection with the disappearance of at least some of those funds.

    It seems more than a little odd that with a US “defense” budget that never (publicly) reached one trillion per year, and with ongoing annual expenditures of many hundreds of billions, somehow several trillion dollars had accumulated in the “bank.” Babylonian money magic, as practiced by a tribal expert such as Rabbi Dov Zakheim, seems to be the only explanation. How the money went missing under Zakheim’s leadership should be easier to explain, but no further investigations have been conducted, possibly because finding out who stole it and who got it might prove to be “anti-Semitic.”

    Russia’s entire annual GDP is less than half the amount Rumsfeld said was missing in 2001- before a bunch more went missing – which should put the discussion of which nation’s elite class is more corrupt in the proper perspective.

  2. The Nightwatcher State, this minimal state that is advocated by many capitalists, is the very necessity of the survival of the Illuminati, a state where costs are socialized (payed with taxes) while profits are privatized.

    The armed forces is the best example of all Nightwatcher State institutions since it is (wars are) the most profitable for them. Investments that private defence contractors make are heavily supported by our taxes, and thus the liberal/capitalist notion of the separation between the Private and the Public is non existent.

    Of course, this socialization of costs continues, as an example, we Swedes were forced to purchase 60 Gripen E/F planes so to subventionize the price for the Swiss that were considering buying ~24.


    Taxpayers are told that this is a “Swedish plane” [in this case but it’s the same story everywhere] and that we all must chip in for the sake of “jobs and prosperity”.

    But where is the national team spirit among capitalists when it comes to sharing the dividends?

Comments are closed.