Intellectual Satanists in Politics

4
920

k

…by Jonas E. Alexis

 

If you think that Satanism is only composed of weird and nihilistic groups of people who drink blood or cast spells on perceived enemies, as in the case of Aleister Crowley and Anton Lavey,[1] then Jewish Neocons Bill Kristol and Jonathan S. Tobin are about to change your worldview.

A little bit about Kristol. His father is none other than the late Irving Kristol, one of the fathers of the Neoconservative movement, which politically and ideologically is Leninism and Stalinism in sheep’s clothing.[2] Irving proudly admitted that the “honor I most prized was the fact that I was a member in good standing of the [Trotskyist] Young People’s Socialist League (Fourth International).”[3]

Keep in mind that Trotskyism and Stalinism were at one point two sides of the same coin. Though the Neoconservatives never quoted Trotsky as “a guiding intellectual influence,” Trotsky directly and indirectly left an indelible mark on them, and this

“helped to shape [the Neoconservative’s] intellectual style as aggressive debaters in a highly politicized environment where sympathy for communism and even Stalin himself was common.

“It was from discussing the finer points of Marxism in the 1930s among formidable intellectual colleagues that they learned to use the sophisticated application of theory as a form of political combat and the conception of politics as something that should be instructed by theory. Ideas were the stock in trade.”[4]

Even after the birth of the Neoconservative movement, many of its members such as Stephen Schwartz of the Weekly Standard and Joan Wohlstetter of the RAND Corporation still had a burning thirst for Lev Davidovich Bronstein, known as Leon Trotsky.[5]

When Trotskyism traveled to the United States under a new banner named Neoconservatism, it didn’t change its metaphysical source, which was and still is the Talmud. As Jewish writer Sidney Blumenthal has shown, the Neoconservative movement has its political and intellectual ideology “in the disputatious heritage of the Talmud.”[6] Irving Kristol added that people like himself

“did not forsake their Jewish heritage to replace it with another form of cultural identity or ethnic belonging. What they sought can best be described as an abstract and futuristic idealism of assimilation qua emancipation in the denationalized and secularized democratic society, ideally of universal scope. Leaving the world of their childhood did not necessarily imply its total abandonment in one act of irreversible forgetfulness.”[7]

So, when you see Bill Kristol on Fox News talking about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, you can safely say that he did not forsake his subversive heritage, which is rooted and grounded in the Talmud, which is a book that teaches that the Goyim are beasts.[8]


"We Neocons have never done anything wrong. We are freedom fighters. Can' you see what we have done in Iraq?"
“We Neocons have never done anything wrong. We are freedom fighters. Can’ you see what we have done in Iraq? As David Horowitz says, we have liberated the country. Can get we an applause?”

What has Kristol been up to lately? Well, he’s been running around like a squirrel saying that Hillary Clinton lied about Gennifer Flowers.[9] That man is really a nutcase living in a nuthouse. Kristol lied about the Iraq war, which will cost us all at least six-trillion dollars, and now he cannot sleep at night because Clinton lied in 1992. How stupid can we be? If I were Bill or Hillary Clinton, I would ask Kristol to get in the political ring and say:

“All right, Kristol. Are you sure you want to cast the first stone, my man? I did have an affair with that woman. I am completely responsible for this sexual impulse and misbehavior. But what about you, Mr. Kristol? Will you ever apologize to the American people for sending a six-trillion dollar bill to them? Will you tell them that you lied about Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and now Syria?

“Will you tell them on Fox News that your father was a Trotskyite when he was in college? Will you tell them that Trotskyism and Leninism and Stalinism, as Francis Fukuyama himself argues, are concentric circles? Will you tell people like Daniel Pipes to stop pursuing Neo-Bolshevik ideology in Syria?

“By the way, didn’t you and your brethren sign an open letter to President Obama saying that the United States needs to bomb Syria? Didn’t you and your brethren lie when they said that Assad used chemical weapons and that those weapons ‘threaten America’?[10]

“And how imbeciles like Jonathan S. Tobin have the audacity to write articles like ‘Global Chaos is Hillary’s Problem’?[11] Does he mean to say that Hillary is responsible for Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Syria? This guy is not mentally stable and therefore needs tranquilizers. Really.

“So, you are abiding by an immoral principle in politics. I admit that I am operating under an immoral principle in sexuality. But you find your principle ‘logical’ and mine ‘immoral.’ I think you are a Satanist in disguise, and you have no moral right in condemning me. When you decide to play by the rules, then give me a call. Now if you excuse me, I’ll have more ladies to talk to.”


[1] For scholarly studies on some of those movements, see Hugh B. Urban, Magia Sexualis: Sex, Magic, and Liberation in Modern Western Esotericism (Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2006); Evelyn Lord, The Hellfire Clubs: Sex, Satanism and Secret Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010); Henrik Bogdan and Martin P. Starr, eds., Aleister Crowley and Western Esotericism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012); Nevill Drury, Stealing Fire from Heaven: The Rise of Modern Western Magic (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).

[2] For a short introduction, see for example Francis Fukuyama, “After Neoconservatism,” NY Times, February 19, 2006.

[3] Stephen Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 43.

[4] Ibid., 45.

[5] Craig Unger, The Fall of the House of Bush (New York: Scribner, 2007), 40-43.

[6] Sidney Blumenthal, The Rise of the Counter-Establishment: From Conservative Ideology to Political Power (New York: HarperCollins, 1998), 124.

[7] Quoted in E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008), 1033-1034.

[8] For a scholarly study on similar issue, see for example Peter Schafer, Jesus in the Talmud (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007); to see how this has played out in history, see for example Israel Jacob Yuval, Two Nations in Your Womb: Perceptions of Jews and Christians in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages (Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2006); Elliott Horowitz, Reckless Rites: Purim and the Legacy of Jewish Violence (Jews, Christians, and Muslims from the Ancient to the Modern (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006); Ruth Langer, Cursing the Christians?: A History of the Birkat HaMinim (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).

[9] “Kristol: ‘Clinton Lied in 1992 About Gennifer Flowers…’,” Weekly Standard, January 7, 2016.

[10] Daniel Halper, “Experts to Obama: Here Is What to Do in Syria,” Weekly Standard, August 27, 2013.

[11] Jonathan S. Tobin, “Global Chaos is Hillary’s Problem,” Commentary, January 8, 2016.

Biography
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, history of Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He is currently working on a book tentatively titled, Kevin MacDonald’s Abject Failure: A Philosophical and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and White Identity. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

Comments are closed.