Numerous reports continue to say that there has been a massive gang rape in Sweden, Finland, Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. The Daily Mail has recently declared:
“Security authorities are growing increasingly concerned by the rising number of sex attacks by gangs of migrants which appear to be spreading across Europe.
“Finland and Sweden today became the latest European countries to issue warnings to women to be wary of the threat of sex attacks following fresh reports of sexual assaults in the last week, while the Viennese police chief adviced women not to go outside alone in Vienna.
“The warnings come as reports emerged that Austrian and German police tried to cover-up the issue over fears of reprisal attacks on asylum seekers and damage to the countries’ tourist trade.
“Dozens of arrests have been made today in connection with the wave of recent sex attacks across Europe. Finnish police said today that they had been tipped off about plans by groups of asylum seekers to sexually harass women following an unusually high level of sexual harassment cases in Helsinki.
“’There hasn’t been this kind of harassment on previous New Year’s Eves or other occasions for that matter… This is a completely new phenomenon in Helsinki,’ said deputy police chief Ilkka Koskimaki.
“Police in Germany are investigating more than 150 cases across five German cities where women have been attacked by the ‘organised Arab or North African gangs, police said.
“Cologne has been at the centre of the problem with around 106 reported cases of assault by migrant gangs since New Year’s Eve.
“A chilling police report about the attacks in Cologne describes women being forced to run through a ‘gauntlet’ of drunken men while officers themselves were mobbed by victims claiming they had been sexually assaulted.
“Two more victims from the night have spoken out today on German TV, after they were sexually assaulted and attacked with fireworks during the city’s New Year’s Eve celebrations.
“One woman, known only as Jenny, suffered serious burns when a firework was shoved into the hood she was wearing.
“’I heard a sizzling sound in my hood,’ said Jenny. ‘I somehow tried to get the firecracker out of the hood. Then it fell into my jacket and burned everything.’
“She added: ‘The scars will be permanent. I was lucky that it didn’t explode.’ One German gun-shop owner Katja Triebel revealed that sales in pepper spray had shot up since the vile attacks in Cologne.
Concerns remain that many of the men involved in the sickening assaults are still at large despite the best efforts by the police.”
I again am working with the premise that those reports are true. But what continues to anger me about this whole issue is that the masses and even so-called thinking people do not want to sit down and start asking some fundamental questions.
Where are those so-called migrants from? Are they from China? Japan? North Korea? Indonesia? Maybe Cuba? Kazakhstan? Why can’t news reporters start asking those metaphysical questions and follow them to their logical conclusions?
If the so-called migrants are from Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and Libya, can we even entertain the thought that the West has created its own monster? And could it be that the Khazarian gangs have been working day and night to bludgeon much of Europe, using those so-called migrants?
Rachel Marsden, “a columnist, political strategist and former Fox News host based in Paris,” has recently written in the Chicago Tribune:
“Western Europe’s mindless and zombie-like prioritizing of humanitarianism over self-preservation is beginning to have alarming consequences….
“How do you even begin to integrate people who have a different cultural perspective on women? Never mind that integration services teaching the new arrivals basic language skills and civics are completely overwhelmed. It’s an immense challenge to change the mindset of a person whose established values are disruptive to society in his new country.”
Marsden does not seem to lack the sophistication or vocabulary to ask deeper questions, but deeper questions may get her into trouble. How do you perpetuate wars in the Middle East without serious repercussions? How can you put your hand into a burning bush and expect that it will be undamaged?
Moreover, how can the West allow the Israeli regime to plunder and literally devastate one country after another in the same region and expect to have a bright future? Could it be that Marsden is a Zionist shill and is therefore part of the problem? Let’s see:
“In 2004, Marsden pled guilty to harassment of her boyfriend, a Vancouver radio show host, following a breakup; she was given a conditional discharge with one year of probation…
“In September 2007, a relationship between Marsden and an Ontario Provincial Police officer ended. She posted his photo and identified him on her blog as an anti-terrorism officer and claimed he had leaked secret anti-terrorism documents to her. The officer filed a complaint of harassment against Marsden, but this was later dropped.
“Marsden contacted Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales in 2006, claiming that her Wikipedia biography was libelous. Wales stated his involvement with her article was handled through the normal channels, and was ‘routine.’ He also says he ‘recused [himself] from any further official action,’ after their relationship became personal.
“On February 29, 2008, the technology gossip blog Valleywag claimed Wales and Marsden had entered into a relationship, and published instant messaging chats they allegedly exchanged. On the following day Wales announced on his Wikipedia user page that he was no longer involved with her.
“In return, Marsden, who claimed to have learned about the breakup by reading about it on Wikipedia, turned to eBay and put up for auction a T-shirt and sweater with white stains that she claimed belonged to Wales.”
So, Marsden is basically a slut pimping the Zionist system, presumably for money and fame. She is a female clown looking for attention. What a pity that she didn’t have the gut to tell her readers at the Chicago Tribune what she has been up to. Those readers would have almost certainly dropped here in a second. She writes like Pamela Geller. The only difference is that Geller is Jewish.
So, you’ve got people like Marsden who are politically stripping on Fox News for the Zionist machine, and then you’ve got so-called alternative media like Infowars saying perverse things such as the “Left” is responsible for the so-called migrant crisis. “Soros funds far left media operations including NPR and Media Matters.”
Sure. But who sent Soros? Who is he working for? What is his real ideology? “Mr. [George] Soros,” the Wall Street Journal tells us, “is a strong advocate for Europe to open its doors to the migrants.”
Soros is the Jewish mogul who gave at least $33 million to groups that supported the Black Live Matter movement in Ferguson. Putin was smart enough to kick him out of Russia. In 2012, Soros wrote an article in the Guardian entitled, “Helping Greek migrants would show European solidarity.” He wrote then:
“As soon as possible, I will dispatch an OSIFE needs-assessment team to Greece to contact the authorities – and the people and organisations already helping the needy – to work out a plan for which we can generate public support. My goal is to revive the idea of the EU as an instrument of solidarity, not only of discipline.”
Why doesn’t Soros dispatch “an OSIFE needs-assessment team” to Israel and urge the mad man in Tel Aviv to accept some migrants as well? Why does this political equation only works in Europe? After seeing that this double standard was too obvious, the Daily Mail wrote an article last September entitled:
“Benjamin Netanyahu says Israel has treated 1,000 wounded Syrians – but refuses to take in refugees because the country is ‘too small.’”
So, Syrian rebels/terrorists are welcome, but so-called Syrian migrants are not. Is Angela Merkel paying attention here? Is Alex Jones listening at all? Will he ask the Israeli officials why they sparked and fabricated the war in Syria in the first place? When will this man start to work for a living? Doesn’t alternative media deserve a better class of reporters?
“‘From 1979, he [Soros] distributed $3 million a year to dissidents including Poland’s solidarity movement, Charter 77 in Czechoslovakia and Andrei Sakharov in the Soviet Union,’ writes Neil Clark. ‘In 1984, he founded his first Open Society Institute in Hungary and pumped millions of dollars into opposition movements and independent media.
“‘Ostensibly aimed at building up a ‘civil society,’ these initiatives were designed to weaken the existing political structures and pave the way for Eastern Europe’s eventual exploitation by global capital. Soros now claims with characteristic immodesty, that he was responsible for the ‘Americanization’ of Eastern Europe.”
These are all true. But Infowars needs to go beyond stage one tell its listeners the whole truth. A little bit of truth here and there isn’t good enough. I’m told that rat poison is 99% good food. It is the 1% that is deadly.
I am convinced that what Jones isn’t telling his readers is more deadly than what he is reporting. And this is not a matter of ignorance. He knows what is actually going on, but he has chosen to remain silent, obviously because he is afraid that Infowars will lose its huge financial support.
People like Alex Jones would say, “Well, Soros is a Leftist. Bam!” All right. Fine. But again what about Daniel Pipes or Barbara Spectre? Can Jones look Pipes in the eye and call him a “Leftist”? How about Bill Kristol? Or Jonathan S. Tobin? Or Max Boot? Can we seriously go after Soros and leave the actual people who started the war in Syria in peace?
The other interesting puzzle is simple this: if the question is not about the “Left” or the “Right,” what is it really about?
E. Michael Jones would argue it is about the Jewish revolutionary spirit, which never rested on a particular ideology but always moved from one diabolical movement to the next.
In other words, you don’t like George Soros because he is a “Leftist”? Welcome to Daniel Pipes. You don’t like Daniel Pipes because he is a flaming Neoconservative and is too wild? Welcome to his puppets—Sarah Palin, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Ann Coulter, Michelle Bachmann, etc.
In short, if you are going to lock yourself in the “Left” and “Right” matrix, then you are going to be confused. For example, Jewish Neocon Ben Shapiro condemns celebrities like Lindsey Lohan for selling sex to young and naïve teenagers. Shapiro writes in Porn Generation:
“It’s impossible to overestimate the amount of oversexed content coming out of Hollywood over the past decade. But it’s not just the explosion of nudity among stars or the weakening of standards that have had an impact on the porn generation….
“Hollywood has embraced the graphic elements of pornography, [and] the moral relativism behind these themes has become an implicit message in nearly every major mass-market films. For films targeted at youth, these messages are often explicit.”
But Shapiro supported the Pussy Riot in Russia, a Trotskyite group which literally produced pornography at a public museum. Shapiro even had the audacity to call it freedom.
Now, if you are on either side of the two political categories in America, Shapiro’s action is inscrutable. But if you understand that there are ideological forces behind the so-called “Left” and “Right,” and if you have the insight to see that those forces have been manipulating the social order for centuries, then perhaps you will get a chance to see things as they really are.
If you doubt this point, then ask Benjamin Disraeli, who articulated in 1844 that no subversive movement in Europe was possible without Jewish radicals. Why? Is it because they possess bad DNA? Is it because there is an inscription on their vein which basically says, “thou shalt corrupt the Goyim and create chaos on earth”?
None of the above.
They are dangerous because they have categorically and metaphysically reject the moral, social, political, and intellectual order. That rejection has been codified in a theological text, which is the Talmud.
If you doubt this, then ask Jewish writer Elizabeth Wurtzel, who wrote a few years ago that “As a people, we are hopeless Talmudists,” which is to say that Wurtzel and others have consciously or unconsciously embraced Talmudic disputations, which are the bedrock upon which subversive ideologies over the centuries have rested.
Netanyahu once again proves this point when he announced in 2014 that Israel’s legal system would be based on the Talmud. If you are still skeptical, Jewish writer Sidney Blumenthal has argued that the Neoconservative movement has its political and intellectual ideology “in the disputatious heritage of the Talmud.”
If that is still not convincing, then the Jewish Encyclopedia would like to remind you that the Talmud is “the supreme authority in religion…for the majority of [Jews].” Even Heinrich Graetz, one of the fathers of Jewish historiography, did not hesitate to say that the “the spiritual life of the Jews” is “ultimately bound up with the Talmud.”
This is not a blanket statement condemning people of good will, but it does put a different spin on the ridiculous ideology that Jewish behavior is genetic, which is the classic definition of anti-Semitism and which has been repudiated by the Church since the beginning of time.
To summarize: if people of Europe are seeking to understand the big picture, then they need to understand the powerful forces behind the political scene. They need to start from the roots and move to the branches later. If your house if filled with spider web, wouldn’t it be reasonable to find out who or what caused the problem first?
You can clean the house, and it probably will look good for a while. But it is highly probable that the insy winsy spider will climb up the waterspout and screw things up again.
If people refuse to find the spider, then maybe this “centrifugal multiplicity,” as one writer has recently put it, is “a self-inflicted wound” which “has resulted in a fifth column inside the citadel.”
 “Migrant rape fears spread across Europe: Women told not to go out at night alone after assaults carried out in Sweden, Finland, Germany, Austria and Switzerland amid warnings gangs are co-ordinating attacks,” Daily Mail, January 8, 2016.
 Rachel Marsden, “Germany dealing with pains of failed integration,” Chicago Tribune, January 12, 2016.
 Emre Peker, “George Soros Calls for Cooperation in Europe on Migrant Crisis,” Wall Street Journal, November 8, 2015.
 Kelly Riddell, “George Soros funds Ferguson protests, hopes to spur civil action,” Washington Times, January 14, 2015.
 George Soros, “Helping Greek migrants would show European solidarity,” Guardian, October 30, 2012.
 “Benjamin Netanyahu says Israel has treated 1,000 wounded Syrians – but refuses to take in refugees because the country is ‘too small,’” Daily Mail, September 6, 2015.
 Ben Shapiro, Primetime Propaganda: The True Hollywood Story of How the Left Took Over Your TV (New York: Broadside Books, 2011), 328.
 Ben Shapiro, Porn Generation: How Social Liberalism Is Corrupting Our Future (Washington: Regnery Publishing, 2005), kindle edition.
 Benjamin Disraeli, Coningsby (Boston: Adamant Media Corporation, 2005), 299.
 See for example Peter Schafer, Jesus in the Talmud (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).
 Elizabeth Wurtzel, “Standing Against a Tide of Hatred,” Guardian, January 16, 2009.
 Marissa Newman, “Netanyahu reported to say legal system based on Talmud,” Times of Israel, May 8, 2014.
 Sidney Blumenthal, The Rise of the Counter-Establishment: From Conservative Ideology to Political Power (New York: HarperCollins, 1998), 124.
 Quoted in E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008), 1065.
 Heinrich Graetz, History of the Jews, Vols. III (Philadelphia: Jewish Publications, 1893), 575.
 Blaise Thompson, “The Rape of Europa,” Culture Wars, January 2016.